Archive for March, 2021

New Vaccine Developed By Massachusetts Doctor To Prevent Lyme Disease in Humans

https://www.fieldandstream.com/story/hunting/lyme-disease-vaccine/

New Vaccine Developed By Massachusetts Doctor to Prevent Lyme Disease in Humans

Clinical Studies have begun for making your enjoyment of the outdoors a lot easier.

By Tom Keer

March 1, 2021

A Massachusetts doctor may have discovered a shot that will prevent Lyme disease in humans.  the drug received federal approval from the Food and Drug Administration to be tested on people at the end of 2020.  The Phase 1 clinical trial on 66 human subjects began last week.  If effective, the shot will be available in Spring 2023.

Dr. Mark Klempner of Massachusetts Biologics at the UMASS Medical School has been working on a cure for Lyme disease for a decade.  (See link for article)

__________________

**Comment**

You may recognize the name of Klempner.  That’s because his  flawed study is still being used to keep chronically sick Lyme/MSIDS patients from extended treatment.  ILADS points out that the Klempner trial relied on average treatment effects, employed small samples (ranging from 37-129), and excluded over 89% of patients who sought to enroll.

Dr. Klempner has been in this game a long, long time.  

He was also the director the BU Biodefense Laboratory.

Excerpt:  

In February 2003, Boston University (BU) submitted a proposal to the NIH to construct a facility with the highest-risk level bioweapons research laboratory (called a BSL-4 laboratory) that would be sited within the BU Medical Center. The medical center is located in a dense, urban neighborhood with a majority of low-income and minority residents nearby. The process of proposal development, site selection and subsequent approval for funding took place in secret, without informing and consulting the local community. The site selected for the laboratory was pre-determined prior to BU undertaking a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) mandated environmental impact review and without involving the surrounding residential and working community – all in violation of federal policy. Nonetheless, NIH approved BU Medical Center’s proposal for $128 million.

But I’m sure this is all purely coincidental.

We are told his ‘pre-exposure prophylaxis’ (PrEP) delivers anti-Lyme antibodies, and they are “unlike vaccines” which trigger the immune system to produce antibodies. PrEP supplies the antibodies directly and kills the bacteria before a person becomes infected.  You would need the jab every single year as it only lasts 9 months.

Before you believe everything they say, you might want to read this.

As you can clearly see, this injection contains OspA, the same outer surface protein found to cause severe adverse reactions in the first Lyme vaccine called Lymerix.  (Please read about the bitter history of how our public ‘authorities’ eliminated from the Western blot two Bb proteins, outer surface protein A (OspA), from which LYMErix was made, and outer surface protein B (OspB), the intended component of next-generation vaccines. This has kept the sickest from being diagnosed.)

For more: 

These people notoriously repackage their ideas and hope we won’t notice. We may be sick but we aren’t dumb.

Category:

Activism, Lyme, vaccines

WI Public Hearing Tomorrow: Consumer Access to Complementary and Alternative Health Practitioners Bill – Submit Testimony Now

Great News Wisconsin!

Public Hearing Tomorrow for Consumer Access to Complementary
and Alternative Health Practitioners bill!

Take Action and Submit Testimony Now!
A public hearing has just been scheduled for March 3rd at 10 am for the Complementary and Alternative Health Care Practitioners Exemption bill (SB 98/AB 86) in the Senate Insurance, Licensing and Forestry Committee!  Please click here to write to your own legislators asking them to support the bill.  Then, please prepare and submit testimony in support of the bill too (details below).

When passed, Wisconsin will join eleven other states in protecting the thousands of wonderful complementary and alternative practitioners who are providing great services to health seekers in Wisconsin.  To refresh your memory:This bill was introduced last session (2019 AB 546/SB 492). It passed the Assembly Health Committee, the Assembly floor and the Senate Committee on Health before stalling in the Senate due to COVID-19. Unfortunately, this legislation was moved aside and was not addressed before the end of the legislative session.

What the Bill Does:
SB 98/AB 86 is a bill to protect your access to services provided by practitioners of complementary and alternative health in Wisconsin such as herbalists, traditional naturopaths, nutritional consultants, homeopaths, Reiki practitioners and many more.  This exemption bill will make it possible for practitioners to provide their services without fear of being charged with practice of medicine without a license as long as they avoid a list of prohibited acts in the bill such as the use of prescription drugs, or puncture of the skin, and as long as they give out proper disclosures.

What you can do:

1. Take Action here to send a message of support for SB 98/AB 86 to your personal legislators.  Please take the time to write a personal note on your letter as this will have a greater impact with the legislator or send the letter we have provided. Start building a relationship with your personal Senate and Assembly Representatives.

2. Call your legislators to leave a message reiterating your support of SB 98/AB 86.  Identify who your legislators are here by entering you address in the box under “Who are my legislators?” and click “Find your Legislator”.  Use their contact info to leave a message with each office letting them know why you support SB 98/AB 86.

Note: if your legislator is a sponsor of the bill, say Thank You!  Current sponsor and cosponsors of the bill include 14 Representatives (Dittrich, Horlacher, Kitchens, Murphy, Mursau, Schraa, Skowronski, Wichgers, Zimmerman, Callahan, Edming, Sortwell, Moses and Rozar) and 3 Senators (Felzkowski, Kooyenga and Bernier).
The message for your personal legislators: “As a constituent of [Senator/Assemblymember] [Insert Legislator’s Last Name] I want [him/her] to know that I support SB 98/AB 86, a bill Protecting Consumer Access to Complementary and Alternative Health Care Practitioners.  SB 98 has been scheduled for a hearing on March 3 in the Senate Insurance, Licensing and Forestry Committee.  Please tell the [Senator/Assemblymember] that I want [him/her] to please vote yes on the bill when it is heard on the floor of the [Senate/Assembly].

[Insert your own brief reason why you support access to complementary and alternative health care (i.e., I depend on complementary and alternative health care for myself and my family and I want Wisconsin law to protect my rights as a consumer to a free and educated choice in health care providers.)] Thank you.”

3. Prepare Your Testimony for the Committee. It’s so important for legislators to hear from the public on a bill.  Your story could be just what a legislator needs to hear in order to vote in favor of the bill.  Written testimony should be given to the Committee in person but we can collect your written testimony and deliver it the day of the hearing.  Please send it to rosanne.lindsay@gmail.com and Nathan.Halbach@huschblackwell.com and we’ll deliver it to the committee for you. 

Note: Due to COVID restrictions and the size of the hearing room, the committee is requesting written testimony over in-person testimony.  They are not allowing virtual testimony at this time.  Therefore, your written testimony is that much more important.  A few sentences about why you support SB 98/AB 86 is all that’s needed.  Please draft and submit it asap.

4. Spread the word about SB 98/AB 86.  Please forward this email to your friends and family so they can Take Action to support SB 98/AB 86 too.

THANK YOU for your commitment to Health Freedom!  If you have questions, contact us at info@nationalhealthfreedomaction.org

Category:

Activism, Treatment

Attention Wisconsinites: Your Action is Needed (Time Sensitive)

SUPPORT AB 23 and AB 25 Prohibiting COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates by State and Local Health and Employers

Dear Wisconsin NVIC Advocacy Team Members, 

Your action is needed to support two good bills that are scheduled for a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Constitution and Ethics on Wednesday, March 3, at 10:00 AM. 

AB 23 would prohibit the Department of Health and local health officials from mandating COVID-19 vaccines and AB 25 would prohibit employers from mandating COVID-19 vaccines as a condition of employment.  These are companion bills to SB 4 and SB 5 that passed the Senate Committee on Human Resources on 1/21/2021.  We need these bills to pass on the Assembly side too.

ACTION NEEDED:

  1. Attend the hearing on 3/3/2021 beginning at 10:00 AM in North Hearing Room (2nd Floor North) and offer testimony in support of AB 23 and AB 25. Social distancing guidelines may limit seating available in the North Hearing Room. Individuals who testify in-person may be asked to leave the room following their testimony, allowing other people to enter the room for testimony. Time limits may be imposed to allow all registrants an opportunity to testify. Additional public access may be provided through an overflow room and the State Capitol Rotunda. Members of the public may submit testimony and hearing slip information to the chairman at rep.wichgers@legis.wi.gov See agenda and  Information on how to testify at a public hearing.  There is no virtual option for individuals who wish to speak but are unable to attend.
  2. If you are unable to attend in person, you can submit written testimony to William Neville, Clerk for the Assembly Committee on Constitution and Ethics at William.Neville@legis.wisconsin.gov.  Copies of your written testimony will be distributed to committee members.  
  3. Contact members of the Assembly Committee on Constitution and Ethics and ask them to support AB 23 and AB 25.  See contact information and talking points below. 
  4. Contact your own Wisconsin State Assembly Representative and them to support AB 23 and AB 25.  If you do not know who your State Representative is, register/login to the NVIC Advocacy Portal at http://NVICAdvocacy.org.  Click on the STATE TEAMS tab and select your state. Their name is displayed on the right side of the page and you can click on their name for contact information. You can also search here. Talking points are posted below.
  5. Sign up to get NVIC’s Wisconsin “Heads Up” text alerts by texting “Wisconsin” to 202-618-5488.
  6. Login to the NVIC Advocacy Portal OFTEN to check for updates and forward this email to family and friends.  Please ask them to register and share their concerns with their legislators as well. 

Assembly Committee on Constitution and Ethics

Representative Wichgers (Chair) – (608) 266-3363 or (888) 534-0083

Representative Thiesfeldt (Vice-Chair) – (608) 266-3156 or (888) 529-0052

Representative Allen – (608) 266-8580 or (888) 534-0097

Representative Ramthun – (608) 266-9175 or (888) 534-0059

Representative Magnafici – (608) 267-2365 or (888) 534-0028

Representative Murphy – (608) 266-7500 or (888) 534-0056

Representative Hebl – (608) 266-7678

Representative Pope – (608) 266-3520 or (888) 534-0080

Representative Cabrera – (608) 266-1707 or (888) 534-0009

Emails

Rep.Wichgers@legis.wisconsin.gov, Rep.Thiesfeldt@legis.wisconsin.gov, Rep.Allen@legis.wisconsin.gov, Rep.Ramthun@legis.wisconsin.gov, Rep.Magnafici@legis.wisconsin.gov, Rep.Murphy@legis.wisconsin.gov, Rep.Hebl@legis.wisconsin.gov, Rep.Pope@legis.wisconsin.gov, Rep.Cabrera@legis.wisconsin.gov

TALKING POINTS (personalize these to explain why passing these bills is important to you and your family) 

  1. AB 23 and AB 25 need to be passed to prevent COVID-19 vaccine mandates from denying law abiding healthy citizens the ability to work or participate in society.
  2. COVID-19 vaccine mandates are already happening. Atria Senior Living is requiring all 14,000 of its employees across 26 states, to receive 2 COVID-19 vaccines by May 1, 2021 as a condition of employment. A Wisconsin nursing home has already started laying off employees for refusing COVID-19 vaccines. The mayor of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania signed an executive order  requiring all city employees to be vaccinated for COVID-19. The Los Angeles Unified School District is requiring COVID-19 vaccines before students can return to the classroom.
  3. Recent surveys of hospital staff, healthcare workers, essential workers, nursing home staff, long term care employees, and firefighters report responses in range from 20-60% saying they would not take a COVID-19 vaccine.  AB 23 and AB 25 are needed to protect critical public safety and care infrastructures in Wisconsin which would otherwise be severely compromised as those who don’t want the vaccine will leave these areas of the workforce.
  4. As of 2/18/21, there have already been 19,907 COVID-19 Vaccine adverse events and 1,095 COVID-19 Vaccine deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. Some short-term and all long-term risks of new COVID-19 vaccines are still unknown. When there is risk, there has to be informed consent and the right to refuse a vaccine without penalty.
  5. In the absence of protective state laws like AB 23 and AB 25, there are no state or federal employee protection exceptions to employee vaccine mandates for all vaccines for reasons of conscience objections to all the vaccines being given to adults.
  6. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission affirms the legal right of an employer to exclude the employee from the workplace even if an employee cannot get vaccinated for COVID-19 because of a disability or sincerely held religious belief and there is no reasonable accommodation possible. The state will have to step in and protect employees’ right to delay or refuse vaccines.
  7. While the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) allows employees to decline Hepatitis B Vaccines, and OSHA and many labor unions have expressed opposition to annual influenza vaccination policies that do not include religious and/or personal objection exemptions, there are far too many gaps in protection for employees to refuse vaccines for work.
  8. People injured by a COVID-19 vaccine have little recourse. Vaccine manufactures and providers are shielded from liability through the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or PREP Act. This federal law establishes that the only option for compensation for COVID-19 vaccine victims is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). Only eight percent of all petitioners since 2010 have been awarded compensation through the CICP. No legal or medical expert fees are covered, no pain and suffering is awarded, lost wages are capped at $50,000, and there is no judicial appeal. Vaccination must be voluntary.  

Sincerely,

NVIC Advocacy Team
National Vaccine Information Center
http://NVIC.org and http://NVICAdvocacy.org
https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Members/ContactUs.aspx

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) works diligently to prepare and disseminate our legislative advocacy action alerts and supporting materials.  We request that organizations and members of the public forward our alerts in their original form to assure consistent and accurate messaging and effective action. Please acknowledge NVIC as originators of this work when forwarding to members of the public and like-minded organizations. To receive alerts immediately, register  at http://NVICAdvocacy.org, a website dedicated to this sole purpose and provided as a free public service by NVIC. 

Category:

Activism, vaccines

60 Minutes: 1979 Swine Flu Investigation Has Uncanny Resemblance to COVID-19

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/02/26/60-minutes-1979-swine-flu-investigation-has-uncanny-resemblances-to-covid-2020-21/  Video Here (Approx 15 Min)

60 Minutes: 1979 Swine Flu investigation has uncanny resemblances to COVID 2020-21

TheCOVIDBlog.com
February 26, 2020

NEW YORK — “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” Those powerful words were first written in the 1905 George Santayana book “Reason in Common Sense.” Winston Churchill changed it a bit in a 1948 House of Commons speech: “those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Unfortunately neither version resonated with most Americans and others around the globe.

Once upon a time in the United States of America, a noble profession called “journalism” existed. Edward R. Murrow and Walter Cronkite inspired a generation of young, ambitious journalists in the 1970s. Mike Wallace was one of their contemporaries. He was a 21-time Emmy Award winner for his work on the long-running CBS new magazine show 60 Minutes.

Millions of Americans watched the 60 Minutes broadcast on Sunday, November 4, 1979. Only about 20% of U.S. households had cable television at the time. Thus most only had five or six channels to choose from. Despite the large audience and powerful reporting, this episode was forgotten and buried. That is until now.  (See link for video and article)

_________________

**Comment**

Please watch this “must see” 60 Minutes episode about the Swine Flu ‘epidemic’ that wasn’t.  The events are uncannily similar to the COVID ‘pandemic’ that isn’t.  Brazen scare-tactics have been used in both cases with a push to get the “vaccine,” at all costs.  If you are unfamiliar with the Swine Flu hoax, start by reading this:   https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/22/the-2009-swine-flu-scam-murderous-anthony-fauci-betrays-public-trust-again/

In 2009 the CDC claimed there were thousands of Swine Flu cases in the US., but secretly, they had stopped counting.

CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, discovered through the Freedom of Information Act (FOI) that hardly any of the Swine Flu cases was Swine Flu, or any flu at all.  After her  findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC doubled down by stating 22 million came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].

In truth, one month before the H1N1 “pandemic,” the WHO declared H1N1 a Level-6 “pandemic” based on 20 cases.  It also changed the definition of “Level-6 Pandemic” so that severe destruction and widespread human death were no longer required. The origins of H1N1 were found in an industrial pig farm in Mexico where there was pig feces all over the property.  When workers became ill, unknown chemicals were sprayed causing more workers to become ill. People were diagnosed similarly to how people are being diagnosed with COVID – by either “eyeballing sick people with ‘flu symptoms’” and automatically claiming Swine Flu was the cause, OR by PCR.  Recently, COVID is down 62% due to lowering the cycles used for the PCR test. The CDC has also stopped counting seasonal flu.  Now, everything is labeled COVID. Hospitals were given money to label deaths as caused by COVID. CDC death statistics are not reliable in making public health decisions.

The experimental, fast-tracked mRNA injections, which aren’t vaccines are being given the credit, yet are causing thousands of adverse reactions and deaths.  Those damaged, often within hours or days, are nearly all told it can not be due to the injection. Many are also testing positive and becoming sick after the injection.  

For more: 

The CDC’s been lying about flu statistics for decades as well:  https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/annual-flu-deaths-scam-unwittingly-exposed-and-replaced-by-the-covid-deaths-scam/

Excerpts:

Only about 15-20 per cent of people who come down with flu-like symptoms have the influenza virus — the other 80-85 per cent actually caught rhinovirus or other germs that are indistinguishable from the true flu without laboratory tests, which are rarely done.

In 2001, a year in which death certificates listed 257 Americans as having died of flu, only 18 were positively identified as true flus. The other 239 were simply assumed to be flus and most likely had few true flus among them.

How does the CDC overestimate the number of flu deaths?  The CDC accomplishes this by reporting a combined pneumonia and influenza death rate.  Every time I try to analyze this data, I know I will have to spend at least an hour searching for the true number who died from influenza because the CDC tries to hide that data.

Why does the CDC do this?  The answer is easy:  The more people that receive the flu vaccine, the more money the CDC makes.  You see, the CDC holds patents on many vaccines including the flu vaccine. (1)

Perhaps I could tolerate the CDC combining pneumonia with flu deaths IF the flu vaccine prevented both.  However, the flu vaccine has never been shown to have any impact on the number of deaths from pneumonia.

In fact, for the vast majority who receive it, the flu vaccine has little impact on preventing the flu, but I digress. –  Dr. David Brownstein

For more: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/03/why-is-cdc-scaring-us-to-death/

Category:

Testing, vaccines, Viruses

Another Woman’s Brain Lining Punctured by COVID Test

https://foxsanantonio.com/news/local/san-antonio-woman-leaks-spinal-fluid-after-receiving-covid-nasal-swab  News Video Here

SAN ANTONIO (WOAI/KABB) — A San Antonio woman is still in shock after she says a Covid nasal swab test went horribly wrong.

“It hurt, it was an immediate instant migraine,” says Chari Timm. “I’ve never had a migraine ever in my life.”

 
Chari Timm says the swab was inserted in her nose and she instantly felt pain.  (See link for article and video)

____________________

**Comment**

Excerpt:

Pneumocephalus is when there has been a rupture in the dural membrane, or the lining that’s around the brain, which allows air to enter the space that’s normally occupied by the head.

Experts say it’s rare, but they aren’t surprised it happened.

“Patients are asked to tilt their head back and the trajectory is more parallel to the nostril, the bridge of the nose and that’s what can bring the that swab further up and put you in a range of potentially having that Covid swab then rupture the dural membranes,” says ENT specialist Spencer Payne.

To read more frightening experiences with this test:  https://www.facebook.com/foxsanantonio/posts/10159319560986738

First, it’s a head scratcher why anyone is STILL getting COVID tests as they are horribly inaccurate and comparable to Lyme tests.

In December, it was reported that saliva tests for COVID are as accurate as nasal swabs – which again, isn’t accurate but safer than these brain-puncturing swabs!
 
 
 
 
 
 

Category:

Activism, Testing, Viruses