Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

The Real Shot in the Dark: New Strain COVID Shot is Already DOA

https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/what-did-pfizer-know-a-shot-in-the-dark  Video Interview Here (Approx. 1 Hour)

What did Pfizer know? A shot in the dark

Thursday, 6th July 2023

Joining Debi Evans is an old friend of UK Column, Cheryl Grainger, a self-employed training consultant to the pharmaceutical industry. Grainger observed from very early on during the pandemic that everything she had been trained to teach others within the industry was now apparently non-applicable. Inspired by the success of a team in the USA that obtained withheld documents on the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid–19 injection, Grainger set out on a one-woman mission to follow the same model in order to obtain the AstraZeneca primary data. Her efforts haven’t stopped there.

Finding herself on the spot to ask a question at a board meeting of the British medicines regulator, the MHRA, in March 2023, she asked the Board about the agency’s Yellow Card serious adverse reaction reports. She was sharply shut down. This led her to wonder: has anyone criticised the MHRA or challenged its funding stream? How independent is the MHRA? Grainger has written two articles for UK Column: Taking on the MHRA—Part 1 and Taking on the MHRA—Part 2. In this interview, Cheryl Grainger walks us through what Pfizer knew before its Covid injection was authorised.

Debi Evans was recently joined by Dr Naomi Wolf to discuss the Pfizer papers. Dr Wolf is co-founder and CEO of the Daily Clout. Her team has published the bestseller The Pfizer Documents Analysis Volunteers’ Reports—Find out what Pfizer, FDA tried to conceal.

What did Pfizer know? In January 2023, with the help of Steve Bannon at the War Room, the Daily Clout and a team of expert volunteers from all around the world began analysing the hundreds of thousands of pages of primary Pfizer documents that had been earmarked to be hidden from public view for 75 years but that were released through successful legal action taken by US lawyer Aaron Siri.

The Pfizer papers can be found here. With 74 reports now in from experts around the world, Cheryl Grainger explains in this interview what their findings mean. What did Pfizer know about the effects on children, pregnant mothers and fertility? What did they know about the dangers to babies? Is shedding real, and if so, how does it happen? The interview covers the meaning of P1 and P2, how the clinical trials were conducted, and why the Pfizer Covid injection has been called a bait-and-switch in the USA.  (See link for article and video)

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/fda-vrbpac-hopelessly-chasing-outgoing?

FDA VRBPAC Hopelessly Chasing Outgoing XBB.1.5 as Fall Target

Strain is 27% and Shrinking Fast–New Vaccine will be Obsolete on Arrival

PETER MCCULLOUGH, MD
JUL 14, 2023

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

From Rita Rubin, Science Reporter for JAMA: “On June 15, members of the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) voted unanimously to recommend updating the COVID-19 vaccine composition to a monovalent XBB lineage.

On June 16, the FDA announced that it had advised manufacturers planning to update their COVID-19 vaccines that they should specifically target XBB.1.5. Scientists from Moderna, Novavax, and Pfizer had told the FDA and its advisory committee that their XBB.1.5 monovalent vaccines could be ready to inject into arms by late July or early fall.

Although the FDA decides what antigens the COVID-19 vaccines should include, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is responsible for deciding who should get them and when. As soon as the FDA greenlights an XBB.1.5 vaccine, “I’m sure the ACIP will have a specially called meeting” to decide how it should be used, William Schaffner, MD, chair of the department of preventive medicine at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, said in an interview.

ACIP stands for the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, on which Schaffner serves as the liaison representing the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, where he is medical director. At the ACIP meeting on an XBB.1.5 vaccine, “I think there will be a rather elaborate discussion on who will receive this vaccine,” Schaffner predicted.”  (See link for article)

__________________

For more:

Category:

Activism, Heart Issues, vaccines, Viruses

The Eye of the Storm: COVID Shots & the Eye

http://  Approx. 13 Min.

Exposing Hidden COVID Injection Injury – The Retina of the Eye Does Not Lie

Dr. Philip McMillan

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40123-021-00415-5

The Eye of the Storm: COVID Injections & the Eye

Xin Le Ng, Bjorn Kaijun Betzler, Rupesh Agrawal12/21

Open Access

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has galvanized the global response towards the development of new vaccines based on novel technologies at an unprecedented pace. Since the widespread implementation of vaccination campaigns, case reports on vaccines’ systemic side effects, including ocular manifestations, have emerged. Since administered vaccines are generally not able to cause the disease in the recipient, or induce an immune response against the pathogen, we hypothesize that the development of ocular phenomena post-COVID-19 vaccination may occur via an immune response elicited by the vaccine. Of many, the most common ocular adverse events include facial nerve palsy, central venous sinus thrombosis and acute anterior uveitis. These COVID-19 vaccine-induced ocular (CVIO) adverse events could resemble the ocular findings in some of the COVID-19 patients. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of published ocular side effects potentially associated with COVID-19 vaccination and serve as a springboard for further research into CVIO adverse events.

For more:

Category:

Eye Issues, vaccines, Viruses

COVID Shots: Pretty Much Bad News All Around: Definitive Proof They Are Causing Death

**UPDATE**

Please watch this insightful and informative 10 minute interview with Dr. Peter McCullough, cardiologist and author of the study below in which he delineates the data from autopsies performed on those who got the COVID shot showing definitive proof the shots are causing death.

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2023/07/meta-review-of-autopsies-finds-link-between-covid-shots-and-death/

Meta Review of Autopsies Finds Link Between COVID Shots and Death

by Barbara Cáceres

Published July 9, 2023

autopsy

An independent meta review of autopsies on people who died after COVID-19 vaccination, published as a preprint in The Lancet online on July 5, 2023, found that 74 percent of the deaths were causally related to the shots. The review included 44 published papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. According to one of the study’s co-authors, cardiologist Peter McCullough, MD, MPH of the Wellness Company, the review is the “final retort” to, “you cannot prove the vaccine caused the death.”1

Other co-authors of the study include doctors from Alberta (Canada) Health Services, the University of Michigan School of Public Health, Yale University School of Public Health and the Wellness Company, as well as a former senior COVID pandemic advisor to the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS).1

The most implicated organ system in COVID vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53 percent), followed by the hematological (blood) system (17 percent), the respiratory system (8 percent) and multiple organ systems (7 percent). The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days, with most deaths occurring within a week from last administration of a shot.1

Most of the deaths occurred among individuals who received Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty COVID shot (41 percent), followed by Sinovac Biotech’s CoronaVac (37 percent), AstraZeneca/Oxford University’s Vaxzevria (13 percent), Moderna/NIAID’s Spikevax (7 percent), Johnson & Johnson/Janssen’s Ad26.COV2.S (1 percent) and Sinopharm’s BBIBP-CorV (1 percent).1

Call for Research to Explain Mechanisms of Deaths Occurring After COVID Shots

The study’s authors suggest there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID shots and the deaths that occurred soon afterward in most cases and that “further urgent investigation is required aimed at confirming our results and further elucidating the mechanisms underlying the described fatal outcomes with the goal of risk mitigation for the large numbers of individuals who have taken one or more COVID-19 vaccines.”1

More than 70 percent of the population of United States is considered to have been “fully vaccinated” for COVID. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends the shots for anyone over six months old. The agency also recommends COVID shots for pregnant women.2 3

Dr. McCullough stated:

Going forward in response to sudden unexplained deaths reported in the press, it is reasonable to conclude the cause of death is a fatal covid-19 vaccine injury until proven otherwise. Proof the decedent is unvaccinated or an alternative diagnosis is now required for the vaccine to be exonerated. In the absence of this information, medical examiners, coroners, physicians, and government officials should attribute the death to COVID-19 vaccination.4

Sudden Removal of Study by The Lancet ‘Smacks of Raw Censorship’

The preprint of the study was removed from The Lancet less than 24 hours after it was published—prior to the initiation of an anticipated peer review. It was removed with the sole explanation that “the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.” Dr. McCullough said that the study was removed “after large volume download” from The Lancet’s preprint server.4

Will Jones of The Daily Sceptic wrote:

Without further detail from the Preprints with the Lancet staff who removed the paper it is hard to know what substance the claim that the conclusions are not supported by the methodology really has. A number of the authors of the paper are at the top of their fields so it is hard to imagine that the methodology of their review was really so poor that it warranted removal at initial screening rather than being subject to full critical appraisal. It smacks instead of raw censorship of a paper that failed to toe the official line.5 

Study Methodology is ‘Sound’

Clare Craig, BM, BCh, FRCPath, a diagnostic pathologist and co-chair of the HART (Health Advisory & Recovery Team) pandemic advisory group in the United Kingdom, noted:

It is important that attempts are made to quantify the risk of harm and censorship of these attempts, rather than open scientific critique, does nothing to help reassure people.

The VAERS system [of vaccine adverse event reporting] is designed to alert to potential harms without necessarily being the best way of measuring the extent of those harms. Quantifying the impact of deaths can be done by looking at overall mortality rates in a country, but that is an imperfect system with dubious accuracy.

The alternative approach of auditing deaths through autopsy is sound.5

References

1 Hulscher N, Alexander P et.al. A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After Covid-19 Vaccination. (available at SSRN) July 5, 2023
2 What’s the nation’s progress on vaccinations? USAFacts.org May 10, 2023.
3 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID-19 Vaccines for People Who Would Like to Have a Baby July 14, 2022.
4 McCullough P. COVID-19 Vaccine is the Culprit in Majority Found Dead after Injection. Substack July 5, 2023.
5 Jones W. Lancet Study on Covid Vaccine Autopsies Finds 74% Were Caused by Vaccine—Journal Removes Study Within 24 Hours. The Daily Sceptic July 6, 2023.

______________

**Comment**

The above article only corroborates the current VAERS tally, but ‘the powers that be’ simply don’t care.  Vaers only has about a 1% capture rate so the numbers are horrifically low:

Between Dec. 14, 2020 and June 30, 2023 the following were reported to VAERS:
  • 1,537,131 adverse events
  • 202,684 hospitalizations
  • 66,476 permanent disabilities
  • 37,592 life threatening reactions
  • 35,267 deaths
  • 1,264 birth defects
  • 4,739 fetal deaths
Adverse reactions and deaths after the COVID shots continue to mount.

Fauci, aka Dr. Evil, told the government to tell people not to do autopsies.  Now, finally, a pre-print is attempting to answer the question of why the “vaccinated” are dying within 15 days of COVID infection.  According to Dr. Denis Rancourt, the clot shots have caused the death of 13 million people globally which equates to 1 death for every 2,000 injections.  They are also producing “cancer without tumors,” due to the Spike Protein inducing the Warburg Effect in cells, causing them to overproduce proteins, “clogging” the cell, which in turn causes cancer.

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2023/07/one-in-three-pfizer-vaccine-shots-may-have-been-a-placebo/  Go Here for Video

One In Three Pfizer Vaccine Shots May Have Been A Placebo

by Kim Iversen

Published July 11, 2023

There’s new evidence that many of the batches of the Pfizer [COVID-19] vaccine administered to the public, up to the 30 percent, were placebos. And even worse, the evidence points to regulators knowing about it and willingly administering them. Now, either they were actively experimenting on the public or they were covering up for the fact that the vaccines came with numerous side effects.

Study Here:  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13998

The study shows that a small percentage of injection batches are responsible for nearly 71% of adverse events.

Lead researcher Dr. Vibeke Manniche states,

“4.2% of the batches are associated with almost 71% of the reported side effects. You would usually expect that if the batches were the same quality…You would expect more or less the same amount of side effects…This is a huge difference between the batches…Why did something change along the way?”

The data only shows results from the Danish vaccine roll out but similar shifts in protocol occurred globally. Why was the vaccine required to be kept at extreme cold temperatures initially and then not? Then there’s the other nasty flies in the ointment of Green Monkey DNA, graphene, and many, many other toxic substances and contaminants, as well as known mRNA instability, which as it turns out probably saved lives.

This article by John Leake, who has vast experience as a crime investigator, details the evil logic of corrupting the process of quality-control by corrupting those at the Paul Ehrlich Institute in Germany since they are responsible for all testing of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID “vaccine.” The German BioNTech company appears to have a cozy, fraudulent relationship with the German government since Germany is a founding member of the EU.  In evidence of fraud, the institute knew in advance that it wasn’t necessary to perform quality-control tests on the 32.1% of the batches associated with nearly zero side effects.

_______________

As you read the following article, please remember that there are now nearly 100 studies proving the effectiveness of ivermectin for COVID, but ‘the powers that be’ continue to censor this information despite remarkable recoveries of the sickest patients.

The FDA makes sure to post a picture of a horse to push their idea that the drug is a only a “horse de-wormer,” when it is used regularly and safely for decades in humans in Africa for river blindness. Predictably, the parts of Africa using the drug regularly haven’t seen COVID cases, but all sanity and logic have disappeared in the COVID era.  The narrative of a magic-bullet COVID injection must be pushed at all costs despite being controlled by the DOD and described as “counter measures,” and ordered as “prototypes,” clearly proving this is NOT a vaccine.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/may/05/ivermectin-ban-ended-by-australian-regulator-amid-warning-it-should-not-be-used-as-covid-treatment

Ivermectin ban ended by Australian regulator amid warning it should not be used as Covid treatment

The TGA banned off-label prescriptions when floods of people sought out the drug in the mistaken belief it would treat Covid-19.

The Therapeutic Goods Administration has ended a ban on off-label prescriptions of anti-parasitic drug ivermectin, nearly two years after floods of people attempted to procure the drug in the mistaken belief it would treat Covid-19.

The TGA announced on Wednesday it would remove the ban for off-label prescriptions of the drug from 1 June. Off-label prescriptions had been limited to specialists such as dermatologists, gastroenterologists and infectious disease specialists since September 2021.

The decision was made due to what the TGA said was “sufficient evidence that the safety risks to individuals and public health is low” in the “current health climate”.

The high rates of vaccination against Covid-19 in Australia and high hybrid immunity meant that use of the drug by people was “unlikely to now compromise public health” including the risk of potential shortages of the drug for its stated use for treating river blindness, threadworm of the intestines, and scabies.  (See link for article)

Category:

Activism, research, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Pandemic Leaders Were Biodefense Puppets and Profiteers

https://brownstone.org/articles/pandemic-leaders-were-biodefense-puppets-and-profiteers/

Pandemic Leaders Were Biodefense Puppets and Profiteers

BY    JUNE 26, 2023 

Scandalous incompetence. Profound stupidity. Astounding errors. This is how many analysts – including Dr. Vinay Prasad, Dr. Scott Atlas, and popular Substack commentator eugyppius – explain how leading public health experts could prescribe so many terrible pandemic response policies.

And it’s true: the so-called experts certainly have made themselves look foolish over the last three years: Public health leaders like Rochelle Walensky and Anthony Fauci make false claims, or contradict themselves repeatedly, on subjects related to the pandemic response, while leading scientists, like Peter Hotez in the US and Christian Drosten in Germany, are equally susceptible to such flip-flops and lies. Then there are the internationally renowned medical researchers, like Eric Topol, who repeatedly commit obvious errors in interpreting Covid-related research studies. [ref]

All of these figures publicly and aggressively promoted anti-public health policies, including universal masking, social distancing, mass testing and quarantining of healthy people, lockdowns and vaccine mandates.

It seems like an open-and-shut case: Dumb policies, dumb people in charge of those policies.

This might be true in a few individual cases of public health or medical leaders who really are incapable of understanding even high school level science. However, if we look at leading pandemic public health and medical experts as a group – a group consisting of the most powerful, widely published, and well-paid researchers and scientists in the world – that simple explanation sounds much less convincing.

Even if you believe that most medical researchers are shills for pharmaceutical companies and that scientists rarely break new ground anymore, I think you’d be hard-pressed to claim that they lack basic analytical skills or a solid educational background in the areas they’ve studied. Most doctors and scientists with advanced degrees know how to analyze simple scientific documents and understand basic data.

Additionally, those doctors and public health professionals who were deemed experts during the pandemic were also clever enough to have climbed the academic, scientific, and/or government ladders to the highest levels.

They might be unscrupulous, sycophantic, greedy, or power-mongering. You might think they make bad moral or ethical decisions. But it defies logic to say that every single one of them understands simple scientific data less than, say, someone like me or you. In fact, I find that to be a facile, superficial judgment that does not get to the root cause of their seemingly stupid, incompetent behavior.

Returning to some specific examples, I would argue that it is irrational to conclude, as Dr. Prasad did, that someone like Dr. Topol, Founder and Director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute, who has published over 1,300 peer-reviewed articles and is one of the top 10 most cited researchers in medicine [ref] cannot read research papers “at a high level.” And it is equally unlikely that Anthony Fauci, who managed to ascend and remain atop the highest scientific perch in the federal government for many decades, controlling billions of dollars in research grants [ref], was too dumb to know that masks don’t stop viruses.

There must, therefore, be a different reason why all the top pro-lockdown scientists and public health experts – in perfect lockstep – suddenly started (and continue to this day) to misread studies and advocate policies that they had claimed in the past were unnecessary, making themselves look like fools.

Public health experts were messengers for the biodefense response

The most crucial single fact to know and remember when trying to understand the craziness of Covid times is this:

The public health experts were not responsible for pandemic response policy. The military-intelligence-biodefense leadership was in charge.

In previous articles, I examined in great detail the government documents that show how standard tenets of public health pandemic management were abruptly and secretly thrown out during Covid. The most startling switch was the replacement of the public health agencies by the National Security Council and Department of Homeland Security at the helm of pandemic policy and planning.

As part of the secret switch, all communications – defined in every previous pandemic planning document as the responsibility of the CDC – were taken over by the National Security Council under the auspices of the White House Task Force. The CDC was not even allowed to hold its own press conferences!  (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Yet more proof that COVID madness was NOT a “mistake,” nor were those in leadership roles stupid (although admittedly they looked and sounded very stupid).  Promoting these ideas reinforces that the madness was part of a public health plan.  “Trusted leaders” were puppets for a much deeper and darker agenda run by none other than a national/international cartel which includes the National Security Council under the auspices of the White House Task Force. And now it appears that an Energy & Commerce Investigation shows that key NIH officials including Fauci and 14 others likely served unlawfully as they were not properly reappointed to their positions as required by law.  This raises questions about the legality of billions in federal grants doled out over the past year, including taxpayer funded grants to EcoHealth Alliance and COVID related guidance by Fauci to the White House.

The “public-private partnership” of bioterrorism experts, governments, and “vaccine” developers must end.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

New Report Accuses China of Engineering Mutant Coronaviruses for Malicious Purpose

https://www.theblaze.com/news/wuhan-lab-leak-chinese-military-covid?

Wuhan lab engineered dangerous mutant coronaviruses, worked with Chinese military to develop bioweapons and pre-pandemic COVID vaccines, according to eye-opening report

June 11, 2023
PAUL SACCA

Scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China were intentionally merging dangerous coronaviruses to create new mutant viruses just before the COVID-19 pandemic began, according to a new report. At the same time, the Chinese military was pursuing biological weapons while also funding researchers at the Wuhan lab, investigators reportedly said.

The Sunday Times published an eye-opening report that accuses China of engineering mutant coronaviruses for malicious purposes, including using the new virus as a bioweapon while developing a vaccine to protect their citizens.

“As the world emerged from lockdown, U.S. State Department investigators were given access to secret intelligence on what had been happening in China in the months and years before COVID emerged,” the report read. “More than a dozen investigators were given unparalleled access to ‘metadata, phone information and internet information’ from intercepts collected by the U.S. intelligence services.”

The Sunday Times spoke with three members of the investigative team, which determined: “Wuhan scientists were conducting experiments on RaTG13 from the Moijang mine, and that covert military research, including laboratory animal experiments, was being done at the institute before the pandemic.”

The source claimed that scientists at the Wuhan lab were working on nine different COVID variants.

In 2012, six men clearing an abandoned copper mine in the Mojiang region of south China were infected with a mystery illness, that had symptoms of fever, coughs, and pneumonia. Three of the men required treatment at a hospital and later died. The men did not test positive for any known illnesses, but did have antibodies for an unknown coronavirus.  (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

In a similar script, albeit slightly different, Lyme/MSIDS patients typically do not test positive and to date there is no effective test for tick-borne illness.  While ‘the powers that be’ counted everything a COVID case and death, Lyme/MSIDS cases and deaths continue to be low-balled unless a vaccine is in the pipeline and they need to drum up massive fear so people will take the shots.

Gain of function research is also a common thread, with our own government’s participation – as well as no published information due to it being top-secret.

Cartels containing powerful people and groups are behind both COVID and Lyme/MSIDS

And there’s been plenty of mysterious deaths as well as persecution of doctors by corrupt and bought out medical organizations and the government.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses