https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/how-google-manipulating-covid-related-search-results?
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/herd-immunity-may-only-need-a-10-per-cent-infection-rate
____________________
**Comment**
Important quote:
If herd immunity really is achieved at between 10 to 20 per cent it could mean that many parts of the world are approaching it – or are there already.
It would also make a vaccine completely and utterly unwarranted yet we are being held hostage until this supposed “magic button” that’s been fast-tracked bypassing important safety studies.
https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/21/inovio-covid-19-vaccine-uses-electricity-to-drive-dna-into-body-cells/ DNA (and RNA) vaccines have been available and approved for veterinary medicine, but none have yet been approved for human use.
The World Health Organization (WHO) acknowledges there are gaps in scientific knowledge about DNA vaccines and states:22
Many aspects of the immune response generated by DNA vaccines are not understood.However, this has not impeded significant progress towards the use of this type of vaccine in humans, and clinical trials have begun.
Some of the outstanding questions about DNA vaccine safety include:23
https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/04/covid-19-is-a-vaccine-the-answer/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118220301274
Co-infection has been reported in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome, but there is limited knowledge on co-infection among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The prevalence of co-infection was variable among COVID-19 patients in different studies, however, it could be up to 50% among non-survivors. Co-pathogens included bacteria, such as
Influenza A was one of the most common co-infective viruses, which may have caused initial false-negative results of real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Laboratory and imaging findings alone cannot help distinguish co-infection from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Newly developed syndromic multiplex panels that incorporate SARS-CoV-2 may facilitate the early detection of co-infection among COVID-19 patients. By contrast, clinicians cannot rule out SARS-CoV-2 infection by ruling in other respiratory pathogens through old syndromic multiplex panels at this stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, clinicians must have a high index of suspicion for coinfection among COVID-19 patients. Clinicians can neither rule out other co-infections caused by respiratory pathogens by diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection nor rule out COVID-19 by detection of non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory pathogens.
_____________________
**Comment**
This would explain why COVID-19 does not resemble a simple virus, just as Lyme disease doesn’t present identically from individual to individual. Lyme/MSIDS is also best treated with combination therapy; however, most regular practitioners follow the antiquated and unscientific CDC treatment guidelines which haven’t worked for over 40 years (which in a nutshell is 21 days of doxycycline for all despite body weight and coinfections).
With each day there seems to be more and more similarities to Lyme/MSIDS in that cases are complex and individual. Medicine needs to acknowledge and embrace this complexity: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/26/cdc-playbook-learning-from-lyme/
This also explains why things like antibiotics and anti-parasitics work. The pathogen list did not include tick-borne pathogens but should, as undoubtedly many of these people could very well have undiagnosed infections that COVID-19, much like vaccines, can reactivate latent infections: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/12/02/scottish-doctor-gives-insight-on-lyme-msids/
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (https://aapsonline.org) filed a lawsuit against Department of Health and Human Services and the FDA for “irrational interference” by the FDA with timely access to hydroxychloroquine.
Never in history have we seen such a determined effort by the scientific community and pharmaceutical industry to downplay and lie about the use of a successful drug to treat a deadly disease.
Hydroxychloroquine is the first choice in a study of 6,000 doctors treating the coronavirus. In the field and in independent testing hydroxychloroquine displayed amazing results in treating the COVID-19 virus.
But there was great pushback against hydroxychloroquine for two reasons. The first reason was because it was safe and very inexpensive. The second reason is because Donald Trump promoted its use. (See link for article)
___________________
**Comment**
Just today, the FDA just doesn’t care what works in the clinical setting and gives a big fat NO to HCQ: https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/87066?xid=NL_breakingnewsalert_2020-06-
The purpose of recent HCQ paper in the Lancet was to create uncertainty and skepticism in the drug’s ability to treat COVID-19 because the authors have financial ties to big Pharma. https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/06/fraudulent-hcq-covid-19-study-in-lancet-exposed/
They, along with authorities who also have financial conflicts, want to promote more expensive pharmaceutical options – including Remdesivir. HCQ has shown success in studies around the world, is cheap, has been used safely for decades, and has clinical benefit to certain patients early in the disease process: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/01/rebuttal-on-huge-hcq-study-in-lancet/
Science has been hijacked as well: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/06/fraudulent-hcq-covid-19-study-in-lancet-exposed/
Excerpt:
The Lancet’s boss, Horton, said:
“Now we are not going to be able to, basically, if this continues, publish any more clinical research data, because the pharmaceutical companies are so financially powerful today and are able to use such methodologies, as to have us accept papers which are apparently methodologically perfect but which, in reality, manage to conclude what they want to conclude…
Until the Bayh-Dole Act is repealed, our own government, which is entrusted with public health, is allowed to own patents competing with the private sector. They then are entrusted to set public policy including treatment guidelines despite this conflict of interest. https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/20/cdc-crimes-possible-sherman-provisions-clayton-acts-violated/ This link shows that our own government, regarding COVID-19, violated the Sherman Act by taking U.S. tax dollars to China to do coronavirus research as well as violated the Clayton Act by entering into trade among states.
Here’s the successful HCQ studies the FDA must not be looking at: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/09/hcq-breakthrough-icmr-finds-its-effective-in-preventing-coronavirus-expands-its-use/
Regarding effective COVID treatments, the CDC has stonewalled another one as well: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/02/successful-covid-19-critical-care-stonewalled-by-cdc/
According to Kory, the FLCCCs MATH+ protocol has been delivered to the White House on four occasions, yet no interest has been shown. Worse, he says they continue to be stonewalled by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute for Health. Why?
Isn’t saving lives, right now, and by any means possible, more important than pushing for a vaccine? If the MATH+ protocol works with near-100% effectiveness, a vaccine may not even be necessary. The MATH+ protocol gets its name from:
|
A lone star tick. Courtesy of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
GREENSBORO — Have you heard about the Bourbon virus? No, it’s not related to the coronavirus, but scientists are concerned about this potentially deadly tick-borne disease.
And there’s evidence that ticks in North Carolina are carrying it.
Blood samples taken from deer in New Hanover and Stanly counties in 2014 show antibodies to the virus, indicating ticks here are carrying the disease, according to a letter published recently in the North Carolina Medical Journal. (See link for article)
___________________
**Comment**
This article is well written and has many great pointers.
Important quote:
“And that includes not only when you go hiking in a park or in the woods, but even in your backyard,” he said. “I live in Raleigh, and I can pick up lone star ticks in my backyard.”
https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/07/10/bourbon-virus-linked-to-death-of-park-official/
https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/05/23/cdc-warns-about-7-new-tick-viruses/
https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/04/12/tick-prevention-2019/
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 