Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

2 Minutes of Truth on COVID Shots – Dr. Zelenko & Steve Kirsch

https://rumble.com/vy8swt-premeditated-mass-murder-evidence-suggests-the-fda-and-pfizer-were-aware-of  Video Here (Approx. 2  Min)

“Premeditated Mass Murder” Evidence Suggests FDA & Pfizer Completely Aware of What Would Happen

Dr. Zelenko presents leaked FDA information on mRNA shots.

The FDA had a leaked internal presentation detailing severe side effects two months prior to “vaccine” rollout and Pfizer’s data correlates with the FDA’s.

“There’s a term for this: when there’s 100% correlation. What, the FDA has prophetic powers? So let me tell you what it is: it’s first-degree premeditated mass murder, crimes against humanity, and genocide.” ~ Dr. Zelenko

COVID shots are linked to:

https://mobile.twitter.com/lakovosjustice/status/1507554765106028550  Video Here (Approx. 2 Min)

Steve Kirsch Speaks at U.S. Senate Hearing

U.S. Senate expert witness testimony states that there are 410,000 unexplained deaths in Americans. Insurance company data shows 40% increase in deaths of people under 64. This is the greatest killer of mankind. This is the worse coverup in human history.

For more:

The correlation to the COVID-19 shots now is irrefutable, just from using the U.S. Government’s own data from the CDC, and also from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Naltrexone for Long COVID

https://www.theepochtimes.com/how-a-drug-for-opioid-and-alcohol-addiction-is-helping-treat-long-covid

How a Drug for Opioid and Alcohol Addiction Is Helping Treat Long COVID

By Meiling Lee
March 26, 2022 Updated: March 26, 2022

A drug that’s helping millions of people with opioid or alcohol dependence is also being used to treat those suffering symptoms of long COVID.

Naltrexone has been around since 1984 to treat opioid or alcohol addiction. Given in high doses of 50-milligram tablets or a 380-milligram intramuscular injection, the drug works by binding to opioid receptors in the brain to block the effects—especially the urges and cravings to use—of opioids and alcohol.

Naltrexone has also been found to treat other disorders when administered in low doses. It is used off-label to treat obesity, nerve pain, anxiety, and autoimmune disorders.

“I found it very effective in my patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with Crohn’s disease, with other autoimmune processes, and chronic fatigue syndrome,” Dr. Keith Berkowitz, an internist, told The Epoch Times.

Naltrexone is given at doses of 0.5 to 4.5 milligram for patients with long COVID, along with other repurposed medications like prednisone, ivermectin, and vitamin D, according to Berkowitz. At low doses, naltrexone has a potent anti-inflammatory effect, as well as an endorphin effect. (See link for article)

___________________

SUMMARY:
  • The addition of naltrexone to FLCCC’s treatment protocol has been a “game-changer” for patients struggling with long COVID-19
  • One doctor states patients with long COVID aren’t believed by other doctors for it.
  • WHO published a clinical case definition of long COVID as symptoms that occur 3 months from onset of COVID-19 with symptoms and that last for at least 2 months and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis.
  • The CDC defines long COVID as a “wide range of new, returning, or ongoing health problems people can experience four or more weeks after first being infected” with SARS-CoV-2.
  • FLCCC and other experts recognize long COVID can happen not only after infection but after a COVID shot.
  • It is believed prolonged exposure to spike proteins and lipid nanoparticles produces chronic inflammation causing long COVID. Circulation Research demonstrated the spike protein was able to damage the cells of the vascular system, and that COVID-19 is a vascular disease rather than a respiratory illness.
  • Another study (pdf)—waiting to be peer-reviewed found that people who received “two doses of COVID-19 shots had higher odds of developing Long COVID.”
  • Another study found that the spike protein from the shots persis in the body & remains in lymph node germinal centers for 60 days after the second dose of an mRNA shot.
  • On expert states the more exposure an individual has to the spike protein, the more symptoms they will likely experience.
  • Brain fog is a long COVID symptom that can be so debilitating patients aren’t able to work.
  • Cognitive dysfunction, another long COVID symptom is one of the most frequent persistent symptoms reported, & occurs in 70 percent of long COVID patients. Brain fog, memory issues, and speech and language problems occurred more often at eight weeks or later than during initial infection, and about 86% of participants reported being unable to work due to cognitive dysfunction and/or memory loss, according to a study.
  • Interleukin 6 (IL-6) causes damage … and low dose naltrexone helps modulate it and nuclear factor kappa B protein, or the inflammatory pathway, Dr. Mobeen Syed said in a video presentation on naltrexone.
Naltrexone is often used with Lyme/MSIDS patients as well.  For more:

Category:

Treatment, Viruses

Are There Hidden Genes in DNA/RNA Vaccines?

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.801915/full

Are There Hidden Genes in DNA/RNA Vaccines?

Christopher A. Beaudoin1, Martin Bartas2, Adriana Volná3, Petr Pečinka2 and Tom L. Blundell1*
  • 1Department of Biochemistry, Sanger Building, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia
  • 3Department of Physics, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia

Due to the fast global spreading of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus – 2 (SARS-CoV-2), prevention and treatment options are direly needed in order to control infection-related morbidity, mortality, and economic losses. Although drug and inactivated and attenuated virus vaccine development can require significant amounts of time and resources, DNA and RNA vaccines offer a quick, simple, and cheap treatment alternative, even when produced on a large scale. The spike protein, which has been shown as the most antigenic SARS-CoV-2 protein, has been widely selected as the target of choice for DNA/RNA vaccines. Vaccination campaigns have reported high vaccination rates and protection, but numerous unintended effects, ranging from muscle pain to death, have led to concerns about the safety of RNA/DNA vaccines. In parallel to these studies, several open reading frames (ORFs) have been found to be overlapping SARS-CoV-2 accessory genes, two of which, ORF2b and ORF-Sh, overlap the spike protein sequence. Thus, the presence of these, and potentially other ORFs on SARS-CoV-2 DNA/RNA vaccines, could lead to the translation of undesired proteins during vaccination. Herein, we discuss the translation of overlapping genes in connection with DNA/RNA vaccines. Two mRNA vaccine spike protein sequences, which have been made publicly-available, were compared to the wild-type sequence in order to uncover possible differences in putative overlapping ORFs. Notably, the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine sequence is predicted to contain no frameshifted ORFs on the positive sense strand, which highlights the utility of codon optimization in DNA/RNA vaccine design to remove undesired overlapping ORFs. Since little information is available on ORF2b or ORF-Sh, we use structural bioinformatics techniques to investigate the structure-function relationship of these proteins. The presence of putative ORFs on DNA/RNA vaccine candidates implies that overlapping genes may contribute to the translation of smaller peptides, potentially leading to unintended clinical outcomes, and that the protein-coding potential of DNA/RNA vaccines should be rigorously examined prior to administration.

_____________________

**Comment**

**UPDATE March 25, 2022**

Despite very real safety concerns, lack of efficacy, no data or data manipulation, and the appearance they accelerate death,  Biden is seeking yet another $22.5 BILLION for ‘Boosters for All.’

Here’s some important comments on the paper from James Lyons Weiler, PhD:

“They presume there is not issue with the ORFs on the negative sense strand, apparently unaware of the studies that show the mRNA is, in fact, incorporated into the tissue of fast-dividing cells.

Proteins not found in the human genome expressed by human cells will lead to cytotoxic t-cells attacking them and initiating cell death. Therefore, cellular damage and organ damage will occur due to these unintended, preventable proteins translated by the protein-producing machinery of our cells.

Read the paper’s conclusions. Clearly, these steps should have been done before unleashing this biologic on the human population

It is utterly unacceptable that Moderna and Pfizer did not catch this, and it is similarly unacceptable that FDA and CDC organizations such a VRBPAC and ACIP did not catch this.

There is no plan to update the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines to disrupt these open reading frames – or to remove the unsafe epitopes that can lead to autoimmunity against proteins, including many of those in our immune systems.

It’s time we take the bad news that the public knows and understands – how the rush to vaccines was not even close to “science”, but instead was mayhem.”

For more:

For VAERS data and a mounting list of adverse reactions & deaths reported after COVID shots:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/21/warning-3150-injuries-in-1st-week-of-covid-vaccines-among-american-healthcare-workers-pregnant-women-included/

Category:

vaccines, Viruses

5 Ways DOD’s Recalibrated Health Surveillance Data Looks Like a Fraudulent Attempt to Cover COVID Shot Injuries

https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-5-ways-dods-recalibrated-health-surveillance-data-looks-like-a-fraudulent-attempt-to-cover-vaccine-injury?

Horowitz: 5 ways DOD’s recalibrated health surveillance data looks like a fraudulent attempt to cover vaccine injury

Op-ed

Daniel Horowitz

March 24, 2022

For the past two months, and possibly even earlier, the Defense Health Agency’s Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division has been systematically changing the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) health surveillance data for active-duty soldiers without any transparency. Where are the congressional inquiries?

On Jan. 24, attorney Thomas Renz brought three named military doctors as whistleblowers to Sen. Ron Johnson, and many more who submitted private affidavits, attesting to the fact that DMED showed a massive increase in numerous diagnosis codes ranging from cancers, blood disorders, and heart ailments to strokes, nervous system disorders, and reproductive issues. They attested in sworn statements that the increase in the data reflected their clinical experience in the military over the past year and is, in their professional opinion, the result primarily of mass vaccine injury from the COVID shots.

In a bizarre twist, the military went on to change the data in the ensuing days without ever conducting a formal investigation into what went wrong or releasing a statement to the public. Rather, a week later, in a terse statement to PolitiFact, of all places, officials claimed the high numbers for 2021 were indeed correct, but that there was a glitch in the data for 2016-2020 used by the whistleblowers to establish a baseline, rendering those years way too low.

A four-page document the DOD submitted in Navy SEAL 1 vs. Austin to Florida federal Judge Douglas Merryday provided more information. In that document, officials make it clear that the 2021 numbers were accurate, that the glitch for 2016-2020 only presented itself from September 2021 through the end of January 2022, following a “server migration” last August, that the new data was corrected on Jan. 29, 2022, that DMED was restored the following day, and that by Feb. 2, they had recreated the proper data. That document is extremely terse, alleges no formal investigation, contains no letterhead, and is completely unsigned.

Yet numerous data points suggest that the government is lying about this narrative. Indeed, data was changed numerous times, 2021 data in some instances was slid backwards, and other data points demonstrate that the current data is corrupt. (See link for article)

__________________

**Comment**

Yet another instance of data being manipulated in an under-handed way to fit an accepted narrative.

Yet, Biden is seeking $22.5 BILLION for ‘Boosters for All’ despite lack of efficacy, safety concerns, data manipulation, and other serious issues.

The article is thorough and utilizes graphs showing DMED “fixes” before and after for the following conditions:

  1. Pericarditis – the “fixed” data are implausible because baseline is far too high as well as that there was absolutely zero increase either from COVID or the shots, which has already been proven.  Further, a whistleblower pulled data prior to 2016 and found the data matches the baseline found by whistleblowers and makes the “fixed” version out of sync with history.
  2. Myocarditis – again, rewinding to the previous 10-year baseline shows the “unfixed” version is closer to the original untampered-with data.  Interestingly the “glitches” only shadow the points the whistleblowers make at the time they make it.  Further, number slid backwards and they changed the numbers multiple times during the same month which contradicts four assertions in the court document that they didn’t know about the glitch until Renz’s testimony and that changes were ALL fixed at once in Jan.
  3. Infertility – Renz presented data that was pulled earlier in January by the military doctors showing a 472% increase in female infertility diagnoses in 2021.  When the DHA “fixed” the data, they massively increased the numbers for the previous five years, but they changed it at least three times! Whistleblowers found when they pulled the data before the Johnson hearing, that it had been tampered with several times.  The congressional report is from a year prior to their glitch data, so that data, according to their own narrative, should be correct and would corroborate the numbers from the whistleblowers.
  4. 38% increase in strokes – even after DHA changed most of the data, this STILL shows a 38% increase over the five-year average. Again, government workers changed the data numerous times before they allegedly knew about the glitch.  Whistleblowers, on condition of anonymity, attested to dealing with an unusual number of young, healthy stroke victims who suffered recent strokes, aneurysms, and other neurological damage.  The military has not investigated this.
  5. Exponential increase in “vaccine” injury diagnoses codes –  even after all the DHA data changes, three ICD codes for various types of “vaccine” injury still show anywhere from a 6-17 fold increase in 2021 over the previous 5 years, which harmonizes very well with the VAERS data that show a 10-fold increase in reported deaths and hospitalizations from the shots, except the DMED data are actually from military doctors who identified vaccines as a possible cause of melody.

It is clear that the government’s current data appears to be fraudulent and based on what we already know from VAERS, excess mortality rates, and insurance data around the world, there clearly is a degree of vaccine injury that is not being reported. The totality of the DMED data still shows these concerns in many categories. At the same time, the data is now completely sabotaged. The concern of vaccine injury and a damaged health surveillance system are vital to national security and are equally as problematic. Yet, our government wants us to believe that the first problem doesn’t exist and the second problem was instantly fixed. Clearly, there is more to the story.

For more: 

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

The “No Virus” Theory Based on HIV

**UPDATE**

This article by Dr. Yeadon recently came out and he states he’s learned enough to say that viroLIEgy is wholly fraudulent and that global ‘pandemics’ of severe illnesses are impossible. He states the underlying illnesses are real which is why the lies are so effective. Now, former Pharmaceutical research and development executive Dr. Sasha Latypova is on record also concluding that virology and vaccinology are completely fake sciences invented to prop up billion-dollar pharmaceutical industries that cater to diseases like autism and cancer.

I highly, highly recommend the following article for those of you who have been following the viral theory issue.  While admittedly confusing, it’s important to glean information to be able to make informed decisions. There is disagreement even among experts on the topic. The following article does a fantastic job explaining the nuances between experts.

https://www.activistpost.com/2022/03/the-no-virus-theory-is-based-on-hiv.html

The “No Virus” Theory Is Based on HIV

March 23, 2022Op-Ed by Julie Beal

When Stefan Lanka came up with the no-virus theory, it seems he based it all on HIV and AIDS. It’s like he tried to generalize from one virus to all viruses, using other people’s theories. Tom Cowan and Andrew Kaufman have popularized Lanka’s ideas and have recently suggested that criticisms about the isolation of HIV can be applied to all viruses, including SARS-CoV-2. This is highly misleading, because if anyone decides to look up some of these criticisms, they’ll sound like the stuff the no-virus theorists say, as if it’s some kind of validation, or proof that viruses don’t exist at all. But the scientists who criticised the discovery of HIV were making very specific points about one virus only – they didn’t suggest it applied to other viruses, and none of them said viruses aren’t real. Only Stefan Lanka said that. The whole thing started in 1998 when he revealed his idea:

“I realized that the whole group of viruses to which HIV is said to belong, the retroviruses — as well as other viruses which are claimed to be very dangerous — in fact do not exist at all.”

Generalizing from the one to the many is entirely illogical, and it’s highly misleading to make unverified claims, especially now.[i] As the following table shows, twisting the words and meanings of the original theorists is a crass misrepresentation of their work.  (See link for article)

___________________

SUMMARY:

  • Using a nifty table, the author delineates the differences between the HIV-AIDS critics vs Stefan Lanka. (and there are numerous differences)
  • While Lanka agrees with the Perth Group that HIV had never been isolated and purified correctly and that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS, the Perth group believes AIDS is real, but theorize it’s caused by cellular redox (an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants can cause disease like cancer and/or AIDS).  They also highlight the toxic effects of AZT.
  • In the late 1990’s, there was a row between Peter Duesberg, considered the most famous AIDS dissident, who stated that HIV is a real, albeit harmless harmless vs the Perth Group that denies the existence of HIV  Duesberg states the Perth Group were “claiming way above what the standards are for identification of a virus or microbe, as the cause of a disease.”
  • Far ahead of his time Duesberg stated:  “… vast numbers of harmless microbes exist in the world … even potentially pathogenic bacteria only cause life-threatening disease in those whose immune systems are temporarily or chronically impaired. … We coexist with a sea of microbes and benefit from many, including those that naturally reside in the human body.”
  • Kary Mullis, PCR inventor, also disputed HIV as the cause of AIDS and states there is no document proving it does.  He also states, “anyone can test positive for practically anything with a PCR test, if you run it long enough….with PCR if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody….it doesn’t tell you that you’re sick.” He also emphasized that PCR should never be used to diagnose disease because it can not identify whole (infectious) viruses.
  • Both Etienne de Harven (influential scientist in the AIDS dissident movement) and Duesberg emphasized the role Big Pharma plays in science, and described virologists as “fanatical virus hunters,” and that the study of HIV/AIDS is an “impure science.”
  • AIDS dissidents warned and prepared us for the series of spurious outbreaks that have occurred in the last 20 years.  They, and investigative journalists like Jon Rappoport repeatedly warn that viruses can be used for political theatre and Big Pharma profits, with a complicit media doing their bidding.
  • The author states that the “lure of the no-virus theory is that it seems to explain not only the ronascam, but also the other over-hyped outbreaks, such as SARS, MERS and swine flu. It provides a quick and easy way to criticize both vaccines and virology, and empowers people to ‘prove it for themselves.’” 
  • She further states, “The no-virus theory is a lazy, badly-researched idea that’s full of misunderstandings, and it stymies the anti-covidian movement by closing down debate, preventing research, and giving us a bad name.”
  • Mutant viruses are nothing new. First discovered in the early 1900s, scientists have been mutating them by passaging them through animals and humans, creating unnatural altered versions which might mess with our microbes when used in “vaccines”, thereby damaging our immunity. These mutants can then escape from a lab anytime.

For more:

Category:

vaccines, Viruses