Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

U.S. Military Uses AI to Accelerate Viral Outbreak Modeling & Funds Intranasal Spray Self-Replicating sa-mRNA H5N1 Bird Flu Vax

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/darpa-uses-ai-to-push-viral-pandemic?p

DARPA Uses AI to Push Viral Pandemic Outbreak Modeling From Weeks to Days

Speed is being prioritized over scrutiny, with AI-generated models designed to justify interventions before they can be meaningfully challenged.

Jon Fleetwood
Jan 09, 2026

The U.S. military is funding artificial intelligence (AI) systems designed to drastically accelerate viral outbreak modeling—compressing a process that typically takes weeks into something that can be produced in days, then used to steer real-world interventions.

In other words, the faster the model, the less time there is to question whether the response is justified at all.

This acceleration follows DARPA’s already-documented pre-COVID pandemic infrastructure  designed to turn digital genetic sequences into synthesized viruses and mass-produced mRNA countermeasures on a fixed timeline. (See link for article)

_______________

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/us-military-funds-intranasal-spray?

U.S. Military Funds Intranasal Spray Self-Replicating sa-mRNA H5N1 Bird Flu Vaccine Built From Chimeric Viral Constructs: Journal ‘Nature Communications’

U.S. government is not slowing its push toward intranasal self-replicating RNA vaccine technology.

Jon Fleetwood
Jan 15, 2026

A U.S. military–funded research program has developed an intranasal, self-replicating RNA (sa-mRNA) vaccine targeting H5N1 avian influenza, built using chimeric viral constructs assembled through reverse genetics.

The work was disclosed in a 2026 Nature Communications paper and explicitly funded through a U.S. Army–administered biodefense contracting mechanism.

The vaccine is said to force cells to produce H5N1 bird flu antigen while simultaneously producing viral replication enzymes that copy the self-amplifying RNA inside the cell.

The U.S. government is funding the creation of next-generation bird flu vaccines while funding the creation of purported chimeric “Frankenstein” bird flu viruses.

Congress, the White House, the Department of Energy, the FBI, the CIA, and Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) have confirmed that the COVID-19 pandemic was likely the result of lab-engineered pathogen manipulation.

Why is the government making the bird flu pandemic problem and solution at the same time, just like it was doing with coronaviruses before the COVID-19 outbreak?  (See link for article)

____________

What could possibly go wrong?

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

U.S. Intelligence Classified & Redacted COVID PCR Test Findings & The Replacement for PCR Has Arrived

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/us-intelligence-classified-and-redacted?

U.S. Intelligence Classified and Redacted Findings on COVID-19 PCR Tests: New FOIA Documents

New records show top U.S. nuclear, national security laboratories scrutinized primers used to define the pandemic—but hid the results.

Jon Fleetwood
Jan 14, 2026

Newly released Department of Energy (DOE) records obtained by U.S. Right to Know through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request show that U.S. federal intelligence agencies classified and redacted the results of an internal review of COVID-19 PCR test primers, even as those tests were used to define “cases,” drive emergency policy, and justify unprecedented social and economic controls.

The documents reveal that during the pandemic, the U.S. government quietly subjected PCR test primer sets—the molecular components that determine what PCR tests detect—to classified scrutiny by top national security laboratories, while withholding the findings from the public under national-security and intelligence exemptions.

At the center of the release is a classified internal communication titled “DRAFT memo on Primer Sets,” circulated through the DOE’s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence and reviewed by assay experts at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

The memo itself remains classified.

Its conclusions were redacted.

No public explanation was ever provided.

PCR Testing Was Treated as a Classified Intelligence Issue

PCR tests do not detect an intact virus and do not prove infection.

They work by using short genetic sequences—primers—to bind to matching genetic material and amplify it until a signal is detected.

What a PCR test detects depends entirely on what its primers bind to. (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

What this means is while the public was repeatedly told COVID testing was reliable, specific, and settled science, the test was never handled in a public scientific manner but as a classified intelligence issue.

This should tell you everything you need to know, but it’s actually far worse.

In 2020 we were warned about the CDC’s monopolized COVID testing – something those in Lymeland have had to live with for over 40 years.

Experts have now shown repeatedly that the genetic sequences used in PCRs to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 as well as the flu, and to diagnose cases of illness and death attributed to Covid-19 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes. And that includes the initiators or primers, the most extensive fragments taken at random from their supposed “genome” and even the so-called “target genes” allegedly specific to the “new coronavirus”.

The test is worthless and all “positive” results obtained so far should be scientifically invalidated and communicated to those affected; and if they are deceased, to their relatives. Stephen Bustin, one of the world’s leading experts on PCR, in fact says that under certain conditions anyone can test positive.

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/the-replacement-for-pcr-tests-has?  Go here for article & video interview

The Replacement for PCR Tests Has Arrived

Dr. Roger Hodkinson breaks down how MultiSeq could replace PCR and fix infectious disease testing with multi-target panels and confirmatory Sanger sequencing.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Jan 13, 2026

The COVID era exposed a diagnostic failure that can no longer be ignored: PCR-based testing is not a true “gold standard” for clinical infection diagnosis. PCR is widely treated as definitive, but mechanistically it is not an identification method—it is an amplification step that simply makes more copies of genetic material. The real weakness comes from what many systems use after amplification: probe-based fluorescence detection, which generates a “signal” without actually confirming what is present. That is how medicine ends up with false positives, misclassification, and policy decisions built on unstable data.

In my interview with Dr. Roger Hodkinson—a highly respected pathologist and Chairman of MultiSeq—he explains why the PCR problem is structural: probe-based testing functions like a “lock-and-key,” where partial matches can still trigger a positive signal. Even worse, infectious syndromes (cough/cold, diarrhea, suspected STI) are rarely caused by only one organism—yet most PCR workflows are narrow, slow, and often treated as confirmatory when they’re not. In practice, clinicians are forced into an “educated guess” model because results frequently come back days later and only cover a limited scope.

MultiSeq is attempting to replace this entire model with something fundamentally different: sequence-confirmed diagnosis. Instead of relying on probe fluorescence to “suggest” identity, it uses modified Sanger sequencing to directly read the nucleotide sequence and confirm which pathogen is actually present.  (See link for article & video)

Category:

Activism, Testing, Viruses

PCR Madness Continues

Reliance upon PCR testing is patently insane and/or evil

Faulty PCR testing has been and continues to be used to justify government response to ‘pandemics,’ despite the fact that it’s been shown again and again to be worthless.

  • Creator of the PCR, Kary Mullis, states the test played a central role in the HIV war that lasted 22 years but represented a “laboratory artifact, a set of lab-tortured antigens around which a ‘test’ was built.”  Please see this excellent commentary on Montagnier’s claims by Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al.

    Nothing was proven before it was asserted. This became the norm, paving the way for the situation we are in now.    Global viral communism. 

  • This study showed that 86% of PCR-positive COVID cases were not real infections.
  • This study showed that when PCR is run at 35 cycles or higher, the false positive rate is 97%.
  • This study found patients with PCR tests at a CT above 33-34 are not contagious and can be discharged from the hospital.
  • Cycle threshold (CT) is not reported on PCR tests, making all results meaningless.
  • PCR can’t distinguish virus from harmless, dead viral fragments.
  • PCR tests are detecting host DNA, whether from birds, cows, or humans.
  • FDA package inserts from some ‘vaccines’ confirm live viruses can be shed from bodily fluids for at least 28 days after ‘vaccination’ confirmed by PCR, raising the question of what the test is detecting – vaccine virus RNA or wild virus RNA.
  • According to the PCR inventor and reality, you can get PCR to show virtually anything you want
  • A Portuguese court ruled PCR to be unreliable and unlawful to quarantine people.

Yet, here we are…..

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/who-demands-90000-influenza-and-covid?

WHO Demands 90,000 Influenza and COVID PCR Tests Per Month Worldwide, Spanning 153 Labs in 131 Countries, Including U.S. CDC

Unelected foreign group dictates how sovereign nations must commit to “enhancing influenza pandemic response.”

Jon Fleetwood

The World Health Organization (WHO) has released its overview of “pandemic influenza preparedness and response activities,” in which it reasserts its expectation that labs all over the world provide the unelected foreign body with 90,000 influenza and coronavirus PCR tests per month.

The unprecedented scale of continuous PCR testing on tens of thousands of human respiratory specimens raises serious privacy concerns and questions why the WHO is expanding reliance on a testing method whose reliability has long been contested.

A 2020 Clinical Infectious Diseases publication confirms that cultures from 97% of PCR-positive specimens are unable to grow live virus in cell culture, meaning the vast majority of PCR ‘positives’ do not correspond to detectable, infectious virus.

Moreover, BLAST genetic analysis confirms that the CDC’s influenza PCR primers and probe share widespread partial sequence homology with the human genome, raising questions about how reliably the assay distinguishes influenza virus from background human genetic material in respiratory samples.

Will the WHO again declare a pandemic based on PCR results instead of confirmed infections?

(See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

The new FDA ‘vaccine’ chief, Dr. Vinay Prasad, said it best:

“Do Not test, do Not report cases, do Not wear face masks, do Not take the shots.”

Boom.

Category:

Activism, Testing, Viruses

Good News Just in Time for Christmas: mRNA Truth Bombs & Corruption

http://  Approx. 22 min

Truth Exposed: mRNA Truth Bombs & Corruption

Dr. Drew

Dec. 24, 2025

Naomi Wolf breaks down hidden Pfizer trial data, sudden deaths buried in footnotes, and why regulators and media refused to investigate.

Del Bigtree shares how mainstream media is a bought out, dying monolith and that people are turning to independent news for the truth.  Please see:   https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2025/11/03/the-pfizer-job/

From FDA capture systems to the silencing of key witnesses, this conversation explores how vaccine safety questions were sidelined—and why they’re resurfacing now.

_______________

**Comment**

Another silver lining from the era of COVID tyranny is that people are finally waking up to discover that legacy media, medicine and its professional organizations, science journals, hospitals, public health and it’s monopolized, centralized faulty testing are not to be trusted due to severe conflicts of interest.

Also, the “vaccine religion” is finally getting some much needed air-time with the admission that there were 10 certified child deaths  from the COVID shots – but that the real number is higher. The FDA never required manufacturers to demonstrate—through randomized controlled trials—that vaccinating children reduced hospitalization or death. Available data are deeply limited, rely on methods with notorious biases, and fail to establish whether the vaccine saved more children than it harmed. Source

And more good news: there were 80 lawsuits against hospitals to administer ivermectin to COVID patients. The courts granted the request in 40 of those lawsuits.

  • In 38 of the cases where ivermectin was given, the patients survived.
  • In 38 cases where ivermectin was refused, the patients DIED.  Helloooooo?

“The level of statistical significance on that accidental study is absolutely astronomical.” ~ Dr. Brett Weinstein

Sadly, the majority of the medical “experts” continue to pretend that lifesaving compounds like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine do not work against seasonal flus, common colds and gain-of-function viral lab releases. These same drugs are being used by real doctors for ‘vaccine’-induced adverse events (VAIDS).

The truth eventually outs.
Believing it is an entirely different matter.

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Measles Confusion: Vaccine or Virus?

**UPDATE**

Doubling down, ‘health’ officials are calling for unvaxxed children to be barred from schools as a measles outbreak sparks fear, yet measles is highly treatable, and ‘outbreaks’ are often shaped by missing data points, not to mention the fact that the vaccine is behind most outbreaks.

You won’t hear this on the evening news…..

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/95-of-infants-develop-fever-after?

95% of Infants Develop Fever After Measles Vaccination, 16% Develop More Serious Measles-Like Symptoms: Journal ‘BMC Infectious Diseases’

In 7 out of 10 vaccinated children with measles-like illness, health officials could not tell if the vaccine pathogen or a wild measles virus caused it.

Jon Fleetwood
Dec 15, 2025

A 2025 Shandong province CDC-authored study confirms that vaccinated infants, not unvaccinated, frequently develop clinically measles-like illness caused by live attenuated vaccine virus, and that these post-vaccination illnesses are often indistinguishable from wild measles in surveillance systems, contaminating official measles case data.

The study showed 95.24% of vaccinated infants developed fever, 16.40% developed measles-defining symptoms, ~70% of cases could not be genetically classified, and when classification succeeded, 90.91% matched the vaccine strain—establishing vaccine-derived illness as a measurable contributor to reported measles cases.

That means many measles cases routinely cited by the mainstream media could be caused by the measles vaccine itself, not a “wild” virus.

The study, “Molecular and epidemiological analysis of measles vaccine-associated rash illnesses in Shandong province, China, 2014–2021,” was published last week in BMC Infectious Diseases. (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

It’s important to note that the CDC obfuscates vaccine data is by classifying 95% of measles cases as ‘unvaccinated or unknown’– two fundamentally different categories.

The agency purposely merges unknown cases with unvaccinated ones maximizing the association between measles cases and non-vaccination while obscuring uncertainty in the data.  It purposely does not apply the same logic in reverse – merging ‘unknown cases with vaccinated cases maximizing the association between measles cases and vaccination, which very well could be true.

This allows them to smugly reinforce a predetermined narrative.

The MMR vaccine contains a live measles virus that was created through a laboratory process U.S. military biodefense experts state “could be considered, by current definitions, gain-of-function research.”  Peer-reviewed studies further document vaccine-strain replication and shedding, measles-like illness following vaccination, and frequent inability to distinguish vaccine-strain illness from wild measles in symptomatic cases.

For more:

Download the Measles Fact Sheet

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses