Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

COVID Variants: ‘Much Ado About Nothing’

Despite the continued fear-mongering of conflict riddled public health ‘officials’ on the dire aspect of COVID variants, many experts state state these variants are nothing to worry about.

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/07/health/coronavirus-mutations-analysis/index.html

COVID Mutations: ‘Much Ado About Nothing’

iu-113

Source

Updated March 7, 2020

Excerpts:

Mutation is a mundane aspect of existence for many viruses, and the novel coronavirus is no exception.

“A recent scientific article suggested that the novel coronavirus responsible for the Covid-19 epidemic has mutated into a more ‘aggressive’ form. Is this something we need to worry about? No, and here’s why

The effects of mutation in real life are nuanced and generally innocuous. Using the idea of mutation to incite fear is harmful, especially in the midst of an epidemic like COVID-19 …

The genetic material of the virus is RNA, not DNA like in humans. Unlike with human DNA, when viruses copy their genetic material, it does not proofread its work. Because RNA viruses essentially operate without a spell-check, they often make mistakes.

These ‘mistakes’ are mutations, and viruses mutate rapidly compared to other organisms. While this might sound frightening, mistakes during replication usually produce changes that are neutral or even harmful to the newly generated virus. Neutral mutations, which neither improve nor hinder viruses’ survival, may continue to circulate without any noticeable change in the people they infect.

Mutations that are harmful to the viruses are less likely to survive and are eliminated through natural selection. Fortunately, when mutations occur that help a virus spread or survive better, they are unlikely to make a difference in the course of an outbreak.

Viral traits such as infectiousness and disease severity are controlled by multiple genes, and each of those genes may affect the virus’ ability to spread in multiple ways. For example, a virus that causes severe symptoms may be less likely to be transmitted if infected people are sick enough to stay in bed.

As such, these traits are like blocks in a Rubik’s cube; a change in one characteristic will change another. The chances of a virus navigating these complex series of trade-offs to become more severe during the short timescale of an outbreak are extremely low.”  Source

For a primer on viruses.

Meanwhile, the goalpost for public safety continues to change like the direction of the wind, defying everything known about viruses.

  1. Erroneous models predicted millions of deaths but never came true and had to be downplayed.
  2. Mortality for COVID isn’t much different than the seasonal flu, yet has been hyped like never before.
  3. Hospitals were given money to label cases as COVID, and the CDC stopped counting the flumaking  everything COVID – purposely inflating cases.  Public health ‘officials’ changed the methodology for determining a “virus-caused” death.
  4. PCR testing has given completely unreliable results but was used to create panic using such high cycle thresholds that healthy, uninfected people tested positive.
  5. This was then used to create the myth of asymptomatic infection causing further panic – making everyone an unknown threat.
  6. The solution: wear a mask, or two, or three at all times – even though the virus is smaller than the holes on most masks and doesn’t work. Even with 100% compliance in the military – masks don’t work. Further, mask usage has caused greater risk of infection, impairment, and causes the wearer to have a lack of oxygen.  One expert states masks are doing nothing but “virtue signaling.”  More experts have recently come forth with the latest data stating lockdowns and masks don’t work.
  7. Everything was shut down to prevent hospital overload which never happened in most states. In fact hospital workers in many states have been laid-off.  
  8. Despite these lockdowns, which didn’t do anything except depress us, keep people from obtaining medical help, and single-handedly gave the greatest chance of creating new variants, public health ‘authorities’ tell us this is the ‘new normal,’ and our only hope is a vaccine.  The vaccine will save us.
  9. Yet, despite a $250M Propaganda campaign by the HHS, the ‘vaccine’ hasn’t saved us and doesn’t appear to lessen transmission or keep you from becoming ill. Instead, it has caused a 6,000% increase in reported vaccine deaths in the 1st quarter of 2021 than in the 1st quarter of 2020.
  10. Further, this injection, which doesn’t meet the legal definition of a vaccine, has been described by the manufacturers as “operating systems” called the “soft-ware of life” and prior to COVID, have never been approved to be used on human populations.  It’s been called the perfect “binary weapon.”
  11. Experts are also challenging health ‘officials’ on vaccinating people who were already infected with COVID stating science supporting this doesn’t exist and there’s a potential risk of harm, including death. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), published a blog post stating that people who’ve had COVID still needed the vaccine, while referencing a study that suggested they didn’t. In fact, numerous studies have shown lasting immunity.
  12. Further, the CDC has thwarted efforts to track adverse events and states that anaphylaxis is “rare,” when a recent study showed it occurred 50-120 times more than what the CDC is reporting.
  13. Despite proven, successful treatments for COVID, and the fact there is a 99.991% recovery rate by doing nothing –  the push for this experimental injection continues unabated.  
  14. None of these public ‘officials’ discuss natural immunity.  History is being rewritten – making vaccines the only answer. Funny how these public ‘officials’ own patents and have severe conflicts of interest regarding vaccines.  It is widely known that the CDC is a captured agency and that the CDC foundation serves as a “tax-free slush fund,” receiving billions in tax dollars and millions through private funds yearly. The agency’s 2019 IRS Form 990 says the CDC Foundation received $252 million privately. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has given $2.3 million so far to the CDC in 2021. You can see all Gates to CDC contributions here, and only the United States government gives more to the World Health Organization than the Gates Foundation. The CDC can no longer exist under the guise of a neutral government agency. 
  15. There has been vast censorship of the doctors treating patients who dare to speak out (similarly with Lyme disease). 
  16. Meanwhile, mainstream media, continues to spin the ‘official’ narrative without question.

BTW: the flu virus mutates freely and vaccines haven’t eradicated it – nor will they, ever.

The flu vaccine does not prevent the spread of the flu, doesn’t reduce flu deaths, doesn’t benefit susceptible patients when healthcare workers are vaccinated, and actually INCREASES THE RISK OF CONTRACTING A NON-FLU RESPIRATORY ILLNESS BY 65%. Source

Censored: Dr. Peter McCullough Testifies How Successful Home Treatments for COVID Make Experimental Vaccines Unnecessary (Home Treatment Protocol by AAPS Included)

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/censored-dr-peter-mccullough-md-testifies-how-successful-home-treatments-for-covid-makes-experimental-vaccines-unnecessary/

CENSORED: Dr. Peter McCullough, MD testifies How Successful Home Treatments for COVID Make Experimental Vaccines Unnecessary

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Dr. Peter McCullough is a consultant cardiologist and Vice Chief of Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, TX. He is a Principal Faculty in internal medicine for the Texas A & M University Health Sciences Center.

Dr. McCullough is an internationally recognized authority on the role of chronic kidney disease as a cardiovascular risk state with over 1000 publications and over 500 citations in the National Library of Medicine.

He is the most published scientist in the history of his field.

When the COVID crisis hit, Dr. McCullough began studying the medical literature to find treatments, and began to treat his patients with current drugs “off label,” because his patients who were testing positive for COVID were sent home from the hospitals and told to wait two weeks, with no treatment options.

Dr. McCullough was then the lead author in a study published in the American Journal of Medicine that summarized existing drugs already approved and in the market that had success in treating COVID-19 patients.

At that time, according to Dr. McCullough, there were over 50,000 papers on COVID in the peer-reviewed literature, and none of them dealt with how doctors are supposed to treat COVID.

After publication, it became the most cited study dealing with COVID, and people were contacting Dr. McCullough from all over the world seeking help in treating COVID patients.

He took a few slides from his presentation and decided to publish a YouTube video on it, to help spread the word that there were effective treatments for COVID.

It soon went viral, as could be expected when one of the most respected doctors in the world was presenting effective treatments of COVID, and within about a week YouTube took it down, stating that it violated the terms of their community.

Senator Johnson from Wisconsin then got involved, and arranged for Dr. McCullough and others to give expert testimony in Senate hearings in November of 2020, explaining that people did not have to die from COVID because effective treatments existed.

This life-saving information was being censored in the corporate media, and was being removed by Big Tech in social media.
Dr. McCullough himself is a COVID survivor, and used these treatments personally, and for his family members.

All of this information was explained by Dr. McCullough recently in a Texas Health and Human Services Senate hearing (go to top link for videos).

Obviously choking back tears and trying to keep his composure, Dr. McCullough explained:

You get handed a diagnostic test. It says, here, you’re COVID positive, go home.

Is there any treatment?

No.

Is there any resources I can call?

No.

Any referral lines, hotlines?

No.

Any research hotlines?

No.

That’s the standard of care in the United States. And if we go to any one of our testing centers today in Texas, I bet that’s the standard of care.

No wonder we have had 45,000 deaths in Texas. The average person in Texas thinks there’s no treatment!

Dr. McCullough goes on to urge HHS in Texas to start listing treatments and treatment centers in Texas where patients can get help, and focus on those sick right now, rather than spend so much time on the vaccines.

I have to tell you, what has gone on has been beyond belief!

How many of you have turned on a local news station, or a national cable news station, and ever gotten an update on treatment at home?

How many of you have ever gotten a single word about what to do when you get handed the diagnosis of COVID-19?

That is a complete and total failure AT EVERY LEVEL!

Let’s take the White House.

How come we didn’t have a panel of doctors assigned to put all their efforts to stop these hospitalizations?

Why don’t we have doctors who actually treated patients get together in a group and every week give us an update?

Why didn’t we have that?

Why didn’t we have that at the state level? ZERO!

Why don’t we have any reports about how many patients were treated, and spared hospitalizations?

We have a complete and total blank spot on treatment. It is a blanking phenomenon.

This is a complete and total travesty to have a fatal disease, and not treat it.

Dr. McCullough then tells legislators in Texas what can be done RIGHT NOW to reverse this (but will they do it??).

So what can be done right here, right now?

There’s going to be more people that die in Texas, and it’s an absolute tragedy.

How about tomorrow, let’s have a law that says there’s not a single result given out without a treatment guide, and without a hotline of how to get into research.

Let’s put a staffer on this and find out all the research available in Texas, and let’s not have a single person go home with a test result with their fatal diagnosis, sitting at home going into two weeks of despair before the succumb to hospitalization and death.

It is UNIMAGINABLE in America that we can have such a complete and total blind spot.

Dr. McCullough then has some tough words for medical doctors.

I blame the doctors for not stepping up. Where was the medical society stepping up and effort on this?

How about from the federal and state agencies? There never was a single bit of group collaborative effort to stop the hospitalizations.

Nobody even kind of thought about it!

There’s only one doctor whose face is on TV now. One. Not a panel.

Doctors, we always work in groups. We always have different opinions.

There’s NOT A SINGLE MEDIA DOCTOR ON TV WHO HAS EVER TREATED A COVID PATIENT!

Not a single one!

There’s not a single person in the White House Task Force who has ever treated a patient.

Why don’t we do something bold. Why don’t we put together a panel of doctors that have actually treated outpatients of COVID-19, and get them together for a meeting. And why don’t we exchange ideas, and why don’t we say how we can finish the pandemic strongly.

Isn’t it amazing! Think about this. Think about the complete and total blind spot (regarding home treatments).

A lot of doctors have checked out, and when patients call them, they say “I don’t treat COVID.”

And when I asked those doctors, I said “You don’t treat them, how come?”

They say “Well, there’s no treatment.”

I said, “But do you call them two days later to see how they’re doing?”

No. So what’s that?

That’s not “I don’t treat COVID.”

That’s “I don’t care anymore.”

That’s a loss of compassion. So we have a crisis of compassion in our country in the medical field.

That’s in our house right now.

For every doctor that’s ever told a patient that they don’t treat COVID, okay, but then did they call them two days later and help them get oxygen or see how they’re doing?

If the answer is “no,” that’s the Hippocratic Oath going out. And that’s on us. And I’m telling you we have a real self-check to do in the house of medicine.

Dr. McMcCullough then goes on to explain to this Texas Senate committee why this has happened, which readers of Health Impact News will know all too well already, and perhaps know even better than Dr. McCullough, since we can trace the “Plandemic” all the way back to 2019 and Event 201, and even earlier than that as the U.S. Government has had patents on Coronaviruses since the late 1990s.

I can tell you what happened.

What happened at around May, it became known that the virus was going to be amenable to a vaccine.

All efforts on treatment were dropped.

The National Institutes of Health actually had a multi-drug program.

They dropped it after 20 patients. They said “we can’t find the patients.”

The most disingenuous announcement of all time!

And then Warp Speed went full tilt for vaccine development, and there was a silencing of any information on treatment.

Any. Silencing. Scrubbed from Twitter, YouTube.

You can’t get papers published on this. We can’t even get information out in our own medical literature on this!

There’s been a complete scrubbing.

Watch the full testimony of Dr. Peter McCullough. What he covers in less than 20 minutes is truly amazing, and horrifying. We have it on our Bitchute channel, as well as on our Rumble channel.

And while the pharma-funded corporate media and medical bureaucrats who have a conflict of interest on this topic due to their financial investments in the new experimental “vaccines” will vilify and call Dr. McCullough a “quack,” be assured that he represents thousands and probably tens of thousands of medical doctors worldwide who have also been censored.

Here are two more videos of doctors who echo exactly what Dr. McCullough is testifying to in regards to existing treatments that are effective in treating COVID patients.

  1. https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/09/i-cant-keep-doing-this-pleads-wisconsin-medical-director/  Available on Bitchute and Rumble.
  2. “Nobody Needs to Die” – Frontline Doctors Storm D.C. Claiming “Thousands of Doctors” are Being Silenced on Facts and Treatments for COVID  Available on Bitchute and Rumble.

There is a home treatment protocol mentioned by Dr. McCullough that was published by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons that you can download for free here.

For more COVID-19 treatments:

Coming Soon – Vaccine Passports Will Determine Where You Can Go & What You Can Do

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/coming-soon-vaccine-passports/

Coming Soon — Vaccine Passports Will Determine Where You Can Go and What You Can Do

The Biden administration is partnering with private companies to develop a vaccine passport system, claiming it’s the only path to normalcy, but critics warn passports will steal people’s liberty and data.

The Biden administration and private companies are working to develop vaccine passports that would allow Americans to prove they’ve been vaccinated against COVID as the country opens, The Washington Post reported Sunday.

The initiative, driven largely by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, has gained momentum as a growing number of companies and venues — from movie theaters, restaurants and music venues to cruise lines and sports teams — have said they will require proof of vaccination before opening their doors.

The passports are expected to be free and available through smartphone apps, which would display a scannable code similar to an airline boarding pass. Americans without smartphone access would be able to print out the passports, developers have said.

The White House declined to answer questions about the passport initiative, instead pointing to public statements made by Jeffrey Zients, the White House coronavirus response coordinator during a March 12 press briefing:

“As we increase the number of people vaccinated, we know some people may have a need to demonstrate that they are vaccinated … our role is to help ensure that any solutions in this area should be simple, free, open source, accessible to people both digitally and on paper, and designed from the start to protect people’s privacy.”

According to CNN, multiple government agencies are engaged in conversations and planning, coordinated by the White House, as this kind of system will play a role in many aspects of life, including potentially the workforce.

One of the most significant hurdles facing federal officials is the number of passport initiatives already underway. The Biden administration this month identified at least 17, according to slides obtained by The Washington Post.

One initiative  — a global effort led by the World Health Organization and a digital pass devised by IBM — is being tested in New York state and is rapidly moving forward as the White House deliberates how best to track shots and avoid the perception of a government mandate to be vaccinated.

On Friday, New York was the first to launch a digital vaccine passport system known as Excelsior Pass that residents can use to prove they’ve been vaccinated or recently tested negative for infection, reported USA TODAY.

The New York system, built on IBM’s digital health pass platform, is the first-in-the-nation certification and will be used at dozens of events, including arts and entertainment venues. A venue will scan the QR code, which will generate either a green check or a red X.

The new pass is part of a growing but disjointed effort to provide vaccine “passports” or  certifications, so people won’t have to hang onto a dog-eared piece of paper, worry about privacy issues or forgeries, or pay money to prove they’re not contagious.

According to NPR, New York described the pass this way:

“Businesses and venues can scan and validate your pass to ensure you meet any COVID-19 vaccination or testing requirements for entry. Along with your pass, you’ll be asked to show a photo ID that shows your name and birth date to verify that the Pass belongs to you. Adults may hold passes for accompanying minors.

“Once you and your party enter an establishment, you will still be asked to follow state and CDC guidance regarding social distancing, face coverings and hand hygiene.”

Participation in Excelsior Pass is voluntary, but New Yorkers will have to show alternate proof of vaccination or testing, such as another mobile application or paper form, directly at a business or venue.

Both Madison Square Garden, which is part of the pilot’s program phase, and Times Union Center will begin using the passes by early April with other businesses and venues expected to follow.

The state hopes to eventually link tickets to the Excelsior Pass, so people going to an event at Madison Square Garden, for example, will be able to link their admission and health passes.

But, according to Dr. Naomi Wolf, founder and CEO of Daily Clout, the passport violates people’s liberty.

Last night on “The Next Revolution” with Steve Hilton on Fox News, Wolf said:

“I am not overstating this. I can’t say it forcefully enough. This is literally the end of human liberty in the west if this plan unfolds as planned. Vaccine passports sound like a fine thing if you don’t understand what these platforms can do …

“It’s not about the vaccine. It’s not about the virus. It’s about your data. And once this rolls out you don’t have a choice about being part of the system. What people have to understand is that any other functionality can be loaded onto that platform with no problem at all. What that means is that it can be merged with your Paypal account, with your digital currency, Microsoft is already talking about merging it with payment plans. Your networks can be sucked up. It geolocates you wherever you go. Your credit history can be included. All of your medical history can be included.”

Wolf isn’t the only one slamming vaccine passports. Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas) said in a statement to Fox News:

Vaccine credentials would be a complete government overstep. Individuals in America have a personal responsibility for their health,” said Sessions. “Implementing a ‘vaccine passport’ runs the risk of undermining public trust and substantially limiting normal day-to-day essential activities.

“As a leader, I have chosen to be vaccinated – that was my own decision.”

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) also blasted the idea on Twitter, declaring the measure “unconstitutional.”

Other countries are racing ahead with their own passport plans, with the European Union pledging to release digital certificates that would allow for summer travel, according to the Washington Post.

On March 23, The Defender reported that the European Union was set to vote on a vaccination travel digital certificate, “Green Passport,” which would provide proof of vaccination and negative COVID test.

The pass would include information on the brand of the vaccine, date and place of inoculation and the number of doses administered, as well as information from a lab or hospital confirming negative test results. Holders of the certificate (a QR code on a phone app or on paper) would be exempt from quarantine and other restrictions. The document would be common to all EU citizens and would allow bilateral deals between EU countries and non-member states.

On March 25, members of the European Parliament (MEPs) agreed to fast-track voting on the European Commission’s plan to create a bloc-wide travel pass that confirms COVID vaccination, immunity or testing status in an effort to push the rollout of certificates by June.

According to Politico, to achieve the ambitious timeline, MEPs voted to use an urgent procedure — bypassing relevant parliamentary committees, individual MEPS, debate and the need for a report.

Green group co-president Philippe Lamberts said in Wednesday’s plenary meeting that speeding up the process could sow “considerable distrust” among citizens.

Sophie in ‘t Veld, member of the European Parliament, wrote on Twitter that bypassing parliamentary scrutiny was an “abuse of an emergency situation” and amounted to “blackmail.”

But MEPs still voted in favor of the fast-track option by a wide margin — 468 to 203. Sixteen parliamentarians abstained.

Some in the UK are raising concerns with vaccination passports. According to an opinion piece in The Guardian, Israel, Estonia, Sweden and Denmark are all countries that have introduced, or plan to introduce, vaccine passports for domestic use — but they already have a national ID card system in place.

“If we are to follow their example, we would first need an evidence-based explanation as to how vaccine passports will help to stop the spread of the virus,” Stephanie Hare, an independent researcher and broadcaster, wrote.

Days ago in the UK it was reported that the vaccine passport was simply a “nudge” to push supposedly vaccine-hesitant young people to get the jab, but it is really a scheme that is nothing less than a national ID card by stealth, Hare wrote.

Data on vaccine passports could be used by the police, just as Singapore’s authorities admitted in January to using contact-tracing data.

Hare said “we don’t even know if vaccine passports would help stop the spread of the virus, how long immunity lasts, to what extent vaccines reduce transmission, or by how much, or whether this varies depending on which vaccine we’ve had.”

We don’t know how much such a system would cost, how we would know if it represented good value for the money or whether our resources would be better invested in other solutions. Hare said answers are needed to these questions, as well as an explanation from the government as to why it has done a U-turn on vaccine passports.

“We cannot abandon our civil liberties for such trickery,” Hare said. “Far better to address any problem of vaccine hesitancy directly. Consent implies choice. Excluding people from society unless they get vaccinated is not a real choice.”

SUGGEST A CORRECTION

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.

© [3/29/21] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

__________________________

**Comment**

In case you think this is a far off entity:

http://  Approx. 25 min

‘A Shot Across the Bow’ From Israel

Ilana Rachel Daniel came with an emotional outcry for international help from Jerusalem, the capital of Israel. At record speed, the government is vaccinating the entire population – including pregnant women and children – against the coronavirus.

“Civil rights are put aside and people are not allowed participation in multiple places in society unless they’ve been vaccinated or in some places of work, after repeated PCR testing every 2-3 days,” told Ilana to Flavio Pasquino in the BLCKBX studio via a live stream connection, who tracked down Ilana after an – even – more emotional audio clip on Telegram. Ilana talks about the Green Pass, the Freedom Bracelet, the mRNA vaccine and human rights violations.

“Reminiscent of Fascism,” said Ilana Rachel who emigrated from the US to Jerusalem some 25 years ago. Ilana Rachel is active in Jerusalem as a health advisor, activist and information officer for a new political human rights party (Rappeh) that is heavily opposed by the regime. Censored ruthlessly in both mainstream and social media and with members of the party thwarted in their daily lives.

To hear more from Ilana Rachel Daniel please join her Telegram Channel https://t.me/joinchat/UfvFcFg3ath4IqUe.  This is an official platform to find more info about Rappeh: https://peakd.com/@rappeh The facebook group has been removed and the site can no longer be found, but through this newspaper article you can find some information about the activities of her and the party; https://www.jewishpress.com/multimedi…

BLCKBX is a Dutch YouTube platform including a website https://blckbx.tv with a sharp focus on society matters. We are critical and seeking for truth in a investigative way but we don’t want to polarise the debates. If you want to support our work please donate what ever you can so we can maintain the important work.

For more:

Human Trials Begin for Shot Against Lyme Disease

http://  Approx. 3 Min.

Human Trials Begin For Shot Against Lyme Diease

March 23, 2021

Lyme PrEP still uses OspA, the outer surface protein connected to Lyme-like symptoms caused by the previous Lymerix vaccine.

Excerpts:

Safety concerns began to emerge soon after people began getting LYMErix. Some recipients began to report joint pain and other effects that they attributed to the vaccine. Within a year of the vaccine’s approval, a class action lawsuit was filed against SmithKline Beecham on behalf of 121 people. Although the suit was eventually settled it provided no compensation to the plaintiffs — publicity about it dampened interest in the vaccine.

Meanwhile, growing distrust of vaccines may have compounded LYMErix’s struggles.

But there is another possible point of contention: VLA15 and Lyme PrEP both target the same protein on Borrelia bacteria that LYMErix did — outer surface protein A (OspA).

The approach used to target OspA in LYMErix was linked to concerns that arose about potential side effects. While studies have not confirmed the connection, VLA15 uses a slightly modified vaccine approach and Lyme PrEP delivers a single antibody directly — both of which could circumvent the purported issue. But Telford said some people might still take issue with a vaccine that targets OspA.

“I anticipate Valneva is going to have a problem with activists,” he said, noting that he had informally spoken with some community groups. “The broad statement was ‘No OspA vaccine, no how.’

Klempner, similar to other Lyme Cabal players has a history with biological weapons as both Director and investigator of a bioweapons lab.  He’s been accused of research fraud, and single-handedly has convinced mainstream medicine that extended treatment doesn’t help Lyme/MSIDS patients. The “Klempner” Report has ruled Lyme-land for over 20 years.

Further, I’m with Lyme advocate Carl Tuttle in that we don’t want a vaccine until the issue of chronic/persistent infection is acknowledged. As you can see from this article, there are those who still believe what we are suffering from is a “scam that should be condemned”.

Excerpt:

The Lyme disease controversy keeps on getting bigger, with an hypothetical presentation of “chronic Lyme disease” that some believe to be responsible for late subjective symptoms experienced by patients who are supposedly victims of this chronic infection despite negative examination results and unrelated clinical signs.

This irrational diatribe has been picked up by the media and orchestrated by sectarian supporters of such syndrome – i.e., off-the-rails physicians, associations proclaiming to “defend” the patient’s interests, and even political figures – and has grown into an absurd and troubling polemic. Untruths told by Lyme pseudo-specialists (i.e., the Lyme doctors) and assertions made by people convinced to have chronic Lyme disease are indeed picked up by the media – too eager to disseminate fake news and happy to see the medical authorities flouted – and work to the disadvantage of patients. Patients are fooled, taken advantage of, betrayed, and even encouraged to physically threaten physicians contesting the existence of such syndrome!

Tick-borne illness has been ruled by a Cabal doing pseudoscience, just as COVID has.

In fact, for those paying attention, there are many similarities between how Lyme/MSIDS & COVID have been handled.

For more:

12 Prominent Scientists & Doctors to EU Regulators: Address ‘Urgent’ Safety Concerns Or Halt COVID Vaccines

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/scientists-doctors-halt-covid-vaccines/?

12 Prominent Scientists and Doctors to EU Regulators: Address ‘Urgent’ Safety Concerns or Halt COVID Vaccines

In an open letter published this week, a group of 12 prominent scientists and doctors questioned “whether cardinal issues regarding the safety of the vaccines were adequately addressed prior to their approval” by the European Medicines Agency.

A group of prominent scientists and doctors want the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to answer “urgent” safety questions about the three COVID-19 vaccines authorised for use in the EU, or withdraw the vaccines’ authorisation.

In an open letter published this week, the group questioned “whether cardinal issues regarding the safety of the vaccines were adequately addressed prior to their approval” by the EMA.

The EMA, which is the EU equivalent of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,  approved three vaccines for emergency use in the EU: the Pfizer-BioNtech, Moderna and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines.

In their letter, 12 scientists and doctors noted a “wide range of side effects” is reported following vaccination of previously healthy younger individuals with the gene-based COVID-19 vaccines.

They wrote:

“Moreover, there have been numerous media reports from around the world of care homes being struck by COVID-19 within days of vaccination of residents. While we recognise that these occurrences might, every one of them, have been unfortunate coincidences, we are concerned that there has been and there continues to be inadequate scrutiny of the possible causes of illness or death under these circumstances, and especially so in the absence of post-mortems examinations.”

In their original letter, sent Feb. 28 via email to the EMA, the group asked the EMA to provide responses to seven safety-related issues within ”seven days and address all our concerns substantively. Should you choose not to comply with this reasonable request, we will make this letter public.”

Several of the safety related concerns included in the letter, such as thrombocytopenia, endothelial injury, microthrombi and stroke, have been reported in The Defender.

The authors, led by Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, professor emeritus of medical microbiology and immunology, and former chair, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, have not yet received a response from the EMA.

In a written statement Wednesday, the group said:

“Therefore, as a starting point, we believe it is important to enumerate and evaluate all deaths which have occurred within 28 days of vaccination, and to compare the clinical pictures with those who have not been vaccinated.

“More broadly, with respect to the development of COVID-19 vaccines, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe has stated in their Resolution 2361, on 27th January 2021, that member states must ensure all COVID-19 vaccines are supported by high quality trials that are sound and conducted in an ethical manner. EMA officials, and other regulatory bodies in EU countries, are bound by these criteria. They should be made aware that they may be violating Resolution 2361 by applying medical products still in phase 3 studies. 

“Under Resolution 2361, member states must also inform citizens that vaccination is NOT mandatory and ensure that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to become vaccinated. States are further required to ensure that no one is discriminated against for not receiving the vaccine.”

Bhakdi also issued this video statement, in which he says, “The time for governments to act, the time for everyone to act, is now:” (See top link for video)

These are the seven “urgent” safety issues the group wants the EMA to address:
  1. Following intramuscular injection, it must be expected that the gene-based vaccines will reach the bloodstream and disseminate throughout the body. We request evidence that this possibility was excluded in preclinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
  2. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that the vaccines will remain entrapped in the circulation and be taken up by endothelial cells. There is reason to assume that this will happen particularly at sites of slow blood flow, i.e. in small vessels and capillaries. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in preclinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
  3. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that during expression of the vaccines’ nucleic acids, peptides derived from the spike protein will be presented via the MHC I — pathway at the luminal surface of the cells. Many healthy individuals have CD8-lymphocytes that recognize such peptides, which may be due to prior COVID infection, but also to cross-reactions with other types of Coronavirus. We must assume that these lymphocytes will mount an attack on the respective cells. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in preclinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA. 
  4. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that endothelial damage with subsequent triggering of blood coagulation via platelet activation will ensue at countless sites throughout the body. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in preclinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
  5. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that this will lead to a drop in platelet counts, appearance of D-dimers in the blood, and to myriad ischaemic lesions throughout the body including in the brain, spinal cord and heart. Bleeding disorders might occur in the wake of this novel type of DIC-syndrome including, amongst other possibilities, profuse bleedings and haemorrhagic stroke. We request evidence that all these possibilities were excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
  6. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor on platelets, which results in their activation. Thrombocytopenia has been reported in severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thrombocytopenia has also been reported in vaccinated individuals [8]. We request evidence that the potential danger of platelet activation that would also lead to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was excluded with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
  7. The sweeping across the globe of SARS-CoV-2 created a pandemic of illness associated with many deaths. However, by the time of consideration for approval of the vaccines, the health systems of most countries were no longer under imminent threat of being overwhelmed because a growing proportion of the world had already been infected and the worst of the pandemic had already abated. Consequently, we demand conclusive evidence that an actual emergency existed at the time of the EMA granting Conditional Marketing Authorisation to the manufacturers of all three vaccines, to justify their approval for use in humans by the EMA, purportedly because of such an emergency.

© [3/11/21] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

______________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/21/warning-3150-injuries-in-1st-week-of-covid-vaccines-among-american-healthcare-workers-pregnant-women-included/