Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Notices of Liability for COVID-19 Vaccine Harms and Deaths Served on All Members of the European Parliament & Evidence-Based Position Paper to Ensure Ethical Conduct

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/notices-of-liability-for-covid-19-vaccine-harms-and-deaths-served-on-all-members-of-the-european-parliament/

Notices of Liability for COVID-19 Vaccine Harms and Deaths Served on All Members of the European Parliament

April 23, 2021

Two of the doctors included in the “Doctors for COVID Ethics” group.

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

“Doctors for COVID Ethics” issued a press release today stating that they had issued “Notices of Liability” for vaccine harms and deaths were served on all Members of the European Parliament ahead of the April 28 vote on EU vaccine passports.

Notices of Liability for COVID-19 Vaccine Harms and Deaths Served on All Members of the European Parliament

by Doctors for COVID Ethics

On April 20, 2021, ahead of the April 28 vote on EU vaccine passports (the ‘Digital Green Certificate’), notices of liability for vacccine harms and deaths were served on all Members of the European Parliament.

The full list of recipients can be viewed here.

NOTICE OF LIABILITY (“NOL”)

Source.

_____________________

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/covid-19-restoring-public-trust-during-global-health-crisis

COVID-19: Restoring Public Trust During A Global Health Crisis

May 4th 2021 

GMI Reporter

An Evidence-Based Position Paper to Ensure Ethical Conduct

Executive Summary

(access the entire 444 page document here)

During our investigation into the variety of topics this manuscript covers, a theme began to stand out as a consistent concern. Safe and effective treatments for COVID-19 are inexplicably being withheld. As you read the full position paper, you will encounter many similar examples of what appears to be willful misconduct across several topics. These areas, and pertinent takeaways, are outlined below.

Topic area 1 – Asymptomatic transmission is the basis for public health policies regarding masking and social distancing.

  • Wuhan Participant Study – 9,898,828 enrolled participants were tested using qualitative COVID RT-qPCR testing. Only 300 possible asymptomatic carrier candidates were identified. Of the 300 possible asymptomatic carriers, all were tested using live cell culture to determine if their PCR samples could produce replication-competent virus. All 300 live cell cultures were negative for being able to produce replication-competent virus, indicating that none of the 300 people identified as potential asymptomatic carriers from the 9,898,828 people tested were infectious. Therefore 0.00% of COVID transmissions were asymptomatic.
  • Asymptomatic transmission is widely assumed globally but has never been definitively proven based upon the five medical gold-standards of empirical evidence for the evaluation of infectious disease discussed in the position paper.

Topic area 2 – PCR testing is the major basis for the diagnosis of COVID.

  • RT-qPCR tests are quantitative tests. However, it appears that PCR testing is intentionally being used qualitatively, and cycle threshold values are being manipulated to increase or decrease case counts.
  • Qualitative COVID RT-PCR tests are being used to do exactly what they are not calibrated to do, while confirmatory serologic viral load and antibody testing has been deemphasized.
  • Qualitative COVID RT-PCR cannot determine whether a person is infectious and therefore should not be used to establish a diagnosis without the assistance of additional confirmatory lab testing.

Topic area 3 – Effective treatments for COVID exist and are inexplicably being withheld by the FDA and CDC.

  • Comprehensive nutritional study – Used vitamin A (100,000 IU/day), vitamin C (1,000mg/hour during waking), vitamin D (50,000 IU/day), and Lugol’s Iodine (25mg). One hundred seven out of 107 patients fully recovered within seven days of treatment.
  • Vitamin D study – 191,779 participants across all “latitudes, races/ethnicities, both sexes, and age ranges” demonstrated that participants with deficient serologic vitamin D (<20 ng/mL) were more than twice as likely to be infected by the SARS-COV-2 virus (12.5% vs 5.9%) when compared against participants with a healthy amount of serologic vitamin D (≥ 55 ng/mL).
  • Ivermectin study – “Viral clearance was treatment dose- and duration-dependent. In six randomized trials of moderate or severe infection, there was a 75% reduction in mortality (Relative Risk=0.25 [95%CI 0.12-0.52]; p=0.0002); 14/650 (2.1%) deaths on ivermectin; 57/597 (9.5%) deaths in controls) with favorable clinical recovery and reduced hospitalization.”
  • Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) study – A meta-analysis of 192 studies concluded that HCQ is effective when used early. Early treatment is most successful, with 100% of studies reporting a positive effect and an estimated reduction of 67% in the effect measured (e.g., death, hospitalization, etc.) using a random effects meta-analysis (RR 0.33 [0.25-0.43]).
  • National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey studies – The CDC has known for at least two decades that Americans are deficient in the following key immunological nutrients: Vitamin A (35-45% of the population is deficient), Vitamin C (37-46%), Vitamin D (65-95%), Vitamin E (60-84%), and Zinc (11-15%).

Topic area 4 – Violations of federal law appear to have been perpetuated by the CDC with respect to death certificates, irrevocably altering COVID-19 mortality metrics and causing unnecessary harm to the American public.

  • Data quality was irreparably compromised by the CDC’s implementation of the NVSS COVID Alert No. 2 document on March 24, 2020, which significantly altered death certificate reporting, as well as the CDC’s adoption of the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists’ position paper on April 15, 2020 that defined the criteria for COVID cases without safeguards in place to ensure that the same person could not be counted multiple times. Both practices have significantly affected data aggregation and interpretation, and both adoptions appear to be in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act, the Paperwork Reduction Act, and the Information Quality Act at minimum.
  • For the previous 17 years, pre-existing/comorbid conditions were reported in Part I, not Part II, of death certificates–without incident. By reporting in Part II rather than Part I, the role of comorbidities as cause of death has been deemphasized. This change significantly impacts statistical aggregation, according to Certified Death Reporting Clerks we interviewed. A point of contention with the 2020 change is that it was made without official notification in the Federal Register to initiate federal oversight and invite mandatory public comment.

Topic area 5 – Inaccurate projection models have been widely used to justify public health policies.

  • All computer projection models make assumptions and require inputs. Unfortunately, vast uncertainty surrounds most inputs, especially at the start of a public health crisis.
  • Many models assume everyone is equally susceptible to infection. However, susceptibility depends upon variables such as available nutrient status, pre-existing conditions, age, genetic predispositions, socioeconomics, individual mental outlook, stress exposure, restorative sleep, bioaccumulation of chemical pollution, environmental exposure, place of residence, and multiple other factors unique to the individual.
  • Many COVID-19 projection models presume the frequency of asymptomatic transmission. The underlying assumption is that such infection is possible. However, a 2018 modeling study noted, “In practice, incorporating asymptomatic carriers into models is challenging due to the sparsity of direct evidence.”

Topic area 6 – Violations of medical ethics appear to have been perpetuated by the CDC and FDA.

  • Withholding evidence-based treatment from 399 American men during the Tuskegee Experiment was evidence of willful misconduct and the impetus for our current medical ethics laws. From 1943 to 1972, evidence-based treatment for syphilis was willfully withheld from 399 participants enrolled in the Tuskegee Experiment. With this understanding, would the withholding of evidence-based treatments from 332
  • MILLION Americans during COVID-19 also be considered willful misconduct?
  • Since the Moderna/NIH clinical trial does not end until October 27, 2022, and the Pfizer/BioNTech clinical trial does not end until January 31, 2023, the experimental COVID biologics (vaccines) are considered to be under investigation for safety and efficacy until the trials conclude.
  • With this in mind, every person has the legal right to decline the use of an experimental product still in clinical trial. On this point, we must stand resolute in protecting the individual civil rights each person has over their own bodily sovereignty that are protected by existing informed consent laws. This is especially important since very limited short-term safety data exists, and no long-term safety data exists.

Topic area 7 – Clinical trials continue while adverse events are increasing each week that experimental COVID biologics are distributed.

  • According to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), 1,739 people have died and 38,444 people have experienced adverse events after receiving experimental COVID biologics for records reported from December 13, 2020, to March 12, 2021.
  • The Pfizer/BioNTech clinical trial design measured serologic antibody production post-vaccine administration in Phase 1 only and in fewer than 25 enrolled participants total. Establishing serologic antibody production is the key to determining the efficacy of the experimental COVID biologic. Considering this was not done in Phase 2/3 constitutes a major design flaw of the clinical trial because the trials cannot demonstrate that the biologic actually provides immunity.
  • Only 40,137 of 43,998 enrolled participants were included in final efficacy analysis. A reason for 3,861 enrolled participants not being included in final efficacy analysis was unable to be located within the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) peer-reviewed publication.
  • Only 37,706 of 43,998 enrolled participants were included in final safety analysis. A reason for 6,292 enrolled participants not being included in final safety analyses was unable to be located within the New NEJM publication.

Conclusion:

The collection of this growing body of evidence demonstrates that an independent grand jury investigation and congressional investigation into the research discussed in our position paper is a reasonable and necessary action on behalf of all Americans.

Two Easy Ways You Can Take Action:

1) Help Stand For Health Freedom, a nonprofit advocacy organization, convene a formal grand jury to investigate allegations of willful misconduct by federal agencies during COVID-19; add your signature to this petition now: https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/cdc-grand-jury-investigation

2) Send a pre-drafted, customizable letter through Stand For Health Freedom urging Congress to thoroughly investigate alleged violations of federal law by the CDC that compromised COVID-19 data: https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/investigate-the-cdc

Thank you for taking action and making your voice heard. Together, we can hold the CDC and other agencies accountable for their actions during COVID-19

For questions or inquires, please email COVIDResearchTeam@protonmail.com.

Interested in reading more? Click here to read the entirety of COVID-19: Restoring Public Trust During A Global Health Crisis

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.
______________________
For more on the CDC:

For more on COVID injections:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Informed Consent Disclosure to Vaccine Trial Subjects of Risk of COVID-19 Vaccines Worsening Clinical Disease

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/

Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease

Timothy Cardozo 1, Ronald Veazey 2

Free PMC article

Abstract

Aims of the study: Patient comprehension is a critical part of meeting medical ethics standards of informed consent in study designs. The aim of the study was to determine if sufficient literature exists to require clinicians to disclose the specific risk that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus.

Methods used to conduct the study: Published literature was reviewed to identify preclinical and clinical evidence that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus. Clinical trial protocols for COVID-19 vaccines were reviewed to determine if risks were properly disclosed.

Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

______________________

**Comment**

Another warning shot over the bow that public health ‘authorities’ and the mainstream media are not alerting the public, and particularly vaccine trial participants of the very real issue of ADE.  

According to our public health ‘authorities’ and bought out mainstream media, the mantra “vaccines are safe and effective” is just repeated over and over until it is believed, despite all the evidence to the contrary.  People questioning this narrative are simply bullied through name-calling and below the belt hits. They are further then used to set an example to others to effectively keep the opposition at bay.  Rule by fear.

Recently, Notices of Liability for COVID-19 Vaccine Harms and Deaths were served to all members of the European Parliament, and the group Stand For Health Freedom has developed an Evidence-Based Position Paper to Ensure Ethical Conduct.  This latter group states that a

“theme began to stand out as a consistent concern. Safe and effective treatments for COVID-19 are inexplicably being withheld. As you read the full position paper, you will encounter many similar examples of what appears to be willful misconduct.”

Go here for a summary of the paper.

Further, even authors in a medical journal call for Ivermectin to be ‘globally and systemically deployed,” as well as 120 doctors ask JAMA to retract a flawed study downplaying the efficacy of ivermectin.

Those who dare to treat tick-borne illness appropriately have faced this persecution for 40 years – and it continues to this day.

For more:

Category:

vaccines, Viruses

Federal Gov’t Telling Facebook to Silence Those With Vaccine Safety Concerns Says Lawsuit & Center For Food Safety Sues NIH

https://www.activistpost.com/2021/05/federal-govt-telling-facebook-to-silence-those-with-vaccine-safety-concerns-says-lawsuit.html

Federal Gov’t Telling Facebook to Silence Those With Vaccine Safety Concerns Says Lawsuit

MAY 6, 2021

By Matt Agorist

It is no longer a random act — Facebook censorship has become so blatant and massive that they have indefinitely silenced the former president of the United States. Many pro-censorship advocates cheer this on because they dislike the voices silenced by Facebook. They attempt to justify the censorship with the claims that Facebook is a private company and can do what they want, a lawsuit filed against the social media giant says that is not the case.

A lawsuit filed by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — the chairman of the non-profit group Children’s Health Defense (CHD) — claims Facebook conspires with the federal government to squelch speech which advocates for vaccine safety.

(See link for article)

______________________

**Comment**

Facebook attempted to have the case dismissed but so far the judge “took it under submission.”

While many have attempted to sue FB for censorship, their rebuttal has always been that FB is a private company and can do as it pleases.  What’s new about this lawsuit is the documented collusion between FB, the federal government, the FBI, the Atlantic Council or Digital Forensic Research Lab (government funded) and the CDC and “it’s proxy,” the WHO.

But that’s not all.

From government-funded censorship arms to the revolving door of high-level bureaucrats who fill the ranks of the oligopolies, the “private company” Facebook concept comes crashing down when taking a closer look. Private-sector firms do not need to be explicitly nationalized to further the establishment’s interests; it’s enough to install their alumni in top regulatory positions. Through these methods, Facebook can put on the façade of privatization while actually acting as deputies for the state but alleviating any constitutional checks in the process.

The author of the article states that the answer for this censorship lies not in regulation but in boycott and that it’s imperative to get off these spying, banning platforms who sell your personal information for profit, and whom are tearing society apart.

He further gives alternatives platforms.  You can check them out here.

Source: The Free Thought Project

Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Minds.

______________________

https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/press-releases/6350/center-for-food-safety-sues-nih-over-unlawfully-keeping-secret-federal-funding-of-research-creating-new-more-virulent-pandemic-viruses

Center for Food Safety Sues NIH Over Unlawfully Keeping Secret Federal Funding of Research Creating New More Virulent Pandemic Viruses

NIH Failed to Promptly Release Documents Concerning “Gain of Function/Gain of Threat” Research on Influenza, MERS, SARS, and COVID

MAY 04, 2021

SAN FRANCISCO–Last week, Center for Food Safety (CFS) filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the National Institutes of Health (NIH), an agency with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). CFS is suing the agency over its failure to release government documents related to the approval and issuance of NIH contracts and grants that fund research projects involving controversial gain of function/gain of threat studies with dangerous, so-called “enhanced potential pandemic pathogens.”

“The NIH’s refusal to make public the research it is funding to enhance the transmissibility, infectiousness, and lethality of potential pandemic viruses is grossly irresponsible,” said Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of Center for Food Safety. “We are litigating to get that information because transparency and public knowledge about these highly hazardous experiments could be an important step in avoiding the next pandemic.“

(See link for article)

Important excerpt:

NIH’s unlawful withholding of public records undermines FOIA’s basic purpose of government transparency. CFS has a history of suing the federal government to compel agencies to be compliant with FOIA. CFS’s FOIA program is committed to upholding the principles embodied in FOIA, such as maintaining an open and transparent government.

_____________________

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Bill Gates, China, 23andMe, And Your DNA

The purpose of this post is 3-fold:

  • Everyone should understand this for privacy reasons.  Medical care should be personal, confidential, and protected.
  • Lyme/MSIDS patients in particular often get DNA testing to discover if they have the MTHFR gene or other genes that may inhibit proper detoxification as well as information on their ability to handle certain medications.
  • To reveal, yet again, the importance of understanding the many conflicts of interest and the tangled web of connections that best exemplify the expression, “Things are not as they seem.”  These conflicts of interest/connections drive public health decisions which in turn affect all of us.

https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/bill-gates-china-23me-and-your-dna/

Gates

Bill Gates, China, 23andMe, And Your DNA

Posted on Author
Derrick Broze
Is there a connection between China, Bill Gates, YouTube, and DNA collection?

Recent reports reveal that a Chinese company with connections to the Gates Foundation is involved in COVID-19 testing and poses a potential threat to American privacy, particularly the medical and health data of those who have been tested for COVID-19.

In late January, CBS’ 60 Minutes reported:

“60 Minutes has learned Chinese company BGI Group, the largest biotech firm in the world, offered to build COVID labs in at least six states, and U.S. intelligence officials issued warnings not to share health data with BGI. 

The largest biotech firm in the world wasted no time in offering to build and run COVID testing labs in Washington, contacting its governor right after the first major COVID outbreak in the U.S. occurred there. The Chinese company, the BGI Group, made the same offer to at least five other states, including New York and California, 60 Minutes has learned. This, along with other COVID testing offers by BGI, so worried Bill Evanina, then the country’s top counterintelligence officer, that he authorized a rare public warning.”

“Foreign powers can collect, store and exploit biometric information from COVID tests” declared the notice. Evanina believes the Chinese are trying to collect Americans’ DNA to win a race to control the world’s biodata.”  (See link for article)

________________________

**Comment**

  • This information could be used to monopolize drugs and treatments.
  • Reuters reported in January that more than 40 publicly available documents and research papers show BGI’s regular partnering with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). They share a dozen patents for DNA tests.  A 2015 patent is for a “low-cost kit to detect respiratory pathogens, including SARS (Sever Respiratory Syndrome) and coronaviruses.  
  • BGI’s chief infectious disease expert is listed as an inventor on the patent while also being one of the 1st scientists to have sequenced COVID-19 samples from a Wuhan military hospital. Please remember; however, that China’s chief epidemiologist states the virus was NOT isolated.
  • Natalie Winter of National Pulse uncovered documentation of a relationship between the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and BGI going back nearly a decade, with the Gates Foundation funding BGI projects relating to genome sequencing alongside Chinese Communist Party bodies such as the Ministry of Science and Technology and Academy of Agricultural Sciences.  Dr. Tadataka Yamada, former president of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s global health program, serves as the Chairman of BGI’s Scientific Advisory Board.
  • BGI, worth a market value of around $9 million and known for creating a cloned pig, has sold millions of their COVID-19 test kits around the world.

The article then switches to dangers posed by genealogy companies and that millions have voluntarily submitted their DNA for ancestry and health information.

A former counterintelligence officer told 60 Minutes that Chinese companies are investing in U.S. biotech companies which gives them access to health data. This officer ominously states that this genetic material represents “your past and your future as well as your children’s future.”

China is far from alone and most governments will seek to mine DNA information, which includes the U.S. government, military, as well as private companies.

The article then states 23andMe was discussed on 60 Minutes and that its CEO states the company plans to use DNA information to develop drugs.  The company announced in February it would become a publicly traded company with help from billionaire Richard Branson.

The article connects a spider-web which includes Branson, Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Gates and the BGI Group.  Another little known web includes the CEO of 23andMe, her sister who is CEO of Youtube, and her former husband – one of the founders of Google (which owns Youtube) and president of Alphabet Inc. until 2019.

These webs must be understood due to severe conflicts of interest to understand the wide censorship by Youtube labeling anything that doesn’t fit the COVID-19 narrative as “misinformation.” 

___________________

For more:

Category:

Activism, Testing, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Uncensored Truth Tour

https://www.aflds.org/tour

609349f2cbbe7073600d0faa_Logo Website@2x-p-500

Big Tech, Big Media, and Big Government love to play doctor, but only your chosen physician should be involved in your private healthcare decisions, and no one should be silencing front line first responders.

America’s Frontline Doctors takes the truth directly to the people, with a cross-country road tour headlined by AFLDS.org founder Dr. Simone Gold delivering a profound diagnosis of 2020’s viral propaganda, combatting “The Religion of Public Health”, and also featuring practicing AFLDS physicians and attorneys bringing the unbiased and uncensored facts related to science, medicine, and civil liberties.

At every turn, AFLDS has been a consistent and credible voice for transparency, evidence-based science, ethical practice, and common sense. The Uncensored Truth Tour is a relentless pursuit of the real facts that every person needs to make informed decisions. Each tour stop will engage local communities in a critical conversation about healthcare, the law, and how all Americans can protect both their health and their freedom.

Register now to reserve your spot: AFLDS.org/tour

Tour Dates:

  • May 10, Phoenix, AZ
  • May 11, Albuquerque, NM
  • May 12, Lubbock, TX
  • May 13, Dallas, TX
  • May 14, Austin, TX
  • May 15, San Antonia, TX
  • May 16, Houston, TX
  • May 17, New Orleans, LA
  • May 18, Tallahassee, FL

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses