Online premiere of new Lyme film Wednesday, October 20
October 17 update: The premiere originally scheduled for October 20 has been postponed. According to Rhisa Marie Perera, she did not anticipate so much attention, both locally, and worldwide. She has been advised to push back the date to pursue further options for distribution. When the new date is chosen, we’ll let you know about it.
From Rhisa Marie Parera, Lyme patient and filmmaker:
At 17, I collapsed on my senior trip in high school and spent months in and out of doctors’ offices. After a brief period of respite, I was 19 years old when the intense migraines and constant dizzy spells began. Then, in my early to mid-twenties, constant joint and muscle pain.
Add all of this to a part-time job and full college workload, and I felt like I was running on fumes. I couldn’t believe this was my life. By the time I was 29, I could barely function. After seeing dozens of doctors in my twenties, I was finally diagnosed with Lyme disease.
There were absolutely no answers or help from medical professionals. I had to figure it out on my own to start healing. As a kid, all I ever wanted to do was write stories. I dreamed of writing for a television show, movies, Broadway, anything! I ended up thinking, Why not write down my own story? Six months into the COVID-19 quarantine, I started writing and knocked out a few drafts….
******
Those drafts turned into a film called YOUR LABS ARE NORMAL. Its online premiere will be October 20. Viewing it will be freely available to anybody. The link to the film will be posted on Rhisa’s Facebook page on Wednesday.
As a way of slowing COVID-19 transmission, many countries and U.S. states implemented shelter-in-place (SIP) policies. However, the effects of SIP policies on public health are a priori ambiguous as they might have unintended adverse effects on health. The effect of SIP policies on COVID-19 transmission and physical mobility is mixed. To understand the net effects of SIP policies, we measure the change in excess deaths following the implementation of SIP policies in 43 countries and all U.S. states. We use an event study framework to quantify changes in the number of excess deaths after the implementation of a SIP policy.
We find that following the implementation of SIP policies, excess mortality increases.
The increase in excess mortality is statistically significant in the immediate weeks following SIP implementation for the international comparison only and occurs despite the fact that there was a decline in the number of excess deaths prior to the implementation of the policy.
At the U.S. state-level, excess mortality increases in the immediate weeks following SIP introduction and then trends below zero following 20 weeks of SIP implementation.
We failed to find that countries or U.S. states that implemented SIP policies earlier, and in which SIP policies had longer to operate, had lower excess deaths than countries/U.S. states that were slower to implement SIP policies. We also failed to observe differences in excess death trends before and after the implementation of SIP policies based on pre-SIP COVID-19 death rates.
__________________
**Comment**
All we have to do is look at Sweden who took a very different approach to the ‘plandemic.’
We need to learn from history or we are doomed to repeat it. There will be many more ‘plandemics’ to come. Are we going to allow them to force us to do things that have only damaged people or are we going to say, “enough is enough.” The approach didn’t work before and it won’t in the future.
The latest data out of Vermont shows that a whopping 76 percent of all new Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) deaths are occurring in the “fully vaccinated.”
So-called “breakthrough” cases, which we were told are “rare,” actually account for the vast majority of Chinese Virus deaths in the highly “progressive” state, which is one of the most vaccinated in the nation.
Important excerpts:
The Chinese Virus vaccination rate in Vermont is currently 88 percent among people aged 12 and older. This means that the state should be fully protected against the disease with no more deaths.
So much for a “pandemic of the unvaccinated”
The accepted narrative is maintained despite mounting evidence. The script reads that all of this somehow proves the jabs are working by protecting people against worse outcomes, despite death pretty much being the worst outcome possible. Blind guides continue to state we are in a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” therefore everyone must continue to get the clot shots.
Don’t ask questions, don’t hesitate, just roll up your sleeve already and get the jabs despite what you hear, observe, and feel.
The article points out two very very crucial facts:
“The experts keep spouting mortality statistics based on the 500K+ people who died before vaccines were available,” wrote one commenter at Citizen Free Press.
“If you die within 14 days of being jabbed, you are designated as ‘unvaccinated,’so how do they even know that the eight unvaccinated were really unvaccinated?” asked another.
Tom is no ordinary doctor. He is the former Director of the Center for Disease Control under President Barack Obama. He is also propagating dangerous misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccines. It will cause people to misunderstand the real world results which can cause more people to die, and exacerbate the pandemic.
Dr. Tom is wrong. About as wrong you can get. The real world data has shown that the death rate among the vaccinated, if infected with COVID, can be 3 to 5.7 times higher1 than the death rate of the unvaccinated.
The former Director of the CDC is making what I call an Acceptable Catastrophic Error. This is the kind of error one is allowed to make when they are perceived to have the correct opinion.
After YouTube’s sweeping announcement to censor conversation and open discussion around ANY vaccine, the Ron Paul Institute’s YouTube channel was removed. Though shortly after their channel was restored, countless other videos and channels have been removed without warning, or reason.
This is important to know, understand, and share. This means that Youtube could and possibly has already censored information about Lyme/MSIDS that doesn’t fit the CDC/IDSA narrative. It’s probably just a matter of time.
We should all work together to upload important videos onto a safe platform for future generations.
On September 29th, YouTube announced a new “vaccine misinformation policy” on a blog post titled “Managing harmful vaccine content on YouTube,” which was immediately followed by hundreds of mainstream news articles declaring this a major victory against so-called “anti-vaccine content.”
The news cycle included further amplification of defamatory statements made by the foreign dark money group the Center for Countering Digital Hate against the so-called “disinformation dozen” — a now fully debunked campaign of attack against 12 prominent health freedom advocates; an attack that Facebook itself described as based on a “faulty narrative” with “zero evidence,” according to an August 18 statement made by Monika Bickert, Facebook’s vice president of content policy.
YouTube’s blog post opened up with the following revealing paragraph:
“YouTube doesn’t allow content that poses a serious risk of egregious harm by spreading medical misinformation about currently administered vaccines that are approved and confirmed to be safe and effective by local health authorities and by the World Health Organization (WHO). This is limited to content that contradicts local health authorities’ or the WHO’s guidance on vaccine safety, efficacy, and ingredients.”
Next, YouTube explained, “What this policy means for you [content creators]”:
If you’re posting content
Don’t post content on YouTube if it includes harmful misinformation about currently approved and administered vaccines on any of the following:
Vaccine safety: content alleging that vaccines cause chronic side effects, outside of rare side effects that are recognized by health authorities
Efficacy of vaccines: content claiming that vaccines do not reduce transmission or contraction of disease
Ingredients in vaccines: content misrepresenting the substances contained in vaccines
Examples
Here are some examples of content that’s not allowed on YouTube:
Claims that vaccines cause chronic side effects such as:
Cancer
Diabetes
Other chronic side effects
Claims that vaccines do not reduce risk of contracting illness
Claims that vaccines contain substances that are not on the vaccine ingredient list, such as biological matter from fetuses (e.g. fetal tissue, fetal cell lines) or animal byproducts
Claims that vaccines contain substances or devices meant to track or identify those who’ve received them
Claims that vaccines alter a person’s genetic makeup
Claims that the MMR vaccine causes autism
Claims that vaccines are part of a depopulation agenda
Claims that the flu vaccine causes chronic side effects such as infertility
Claims that the HPV vaccine causes chronic side effects such as paralysis
YouTube’s Orwellian statements above represent highly concerning forms of state-sponsored misinformation and disinformation that claim to protect its users from the very acts they are imposing upon the public.
For example, if the only content allowed on its platform is that which reiterates or reifies the WHO’s or CDC’s claims that the COVID-19 vaccines are unequivocally and a priori “safe and effective,” yet the U.S. government’s own post-marketing surveillance system for vaccine harms — the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, which is notorious for not representing up to 99% of the actual adverse events the public is experiencing1 — shows there have been over 15,000 deaths as a result of the vaccines thus far, then YouTube’s policies and actions themselves constitute a form of “egregious harm” by actively participating in, along with the health authorities it references (e.g. WHO), the minimization and/or coverup of the true side effects of these experimental vaccines.
In essence, by witholding or suppressing information on, or discussion about, the vaccines’ true risks, they are interfering with the mandatory medical ethical principle of informed consent, resulting in untold, but likely immense, harm to public health, civil liberties and human rights.
If the vaccines were, in fact, “effective,” then why is there already a push for boosters? And why are the vaccinated getting “breakthrough” cases if the vaccines are truly “effective”? According to YouTube’s new policies, simply asking these questions will get you deplatformed, and you and your content labeled as “dangerous” and harmful to the public.
YouTube’s official position that the exercise of free speech and open discussion on topics of grave importance to human health, such as the nature, origin, or risks and benefits of treating COVID-19 with vaccines, are causing “egregious harm by spreading medical misinformation” is a boldface assault on the truth. And considering that YouTube is owned by Google’s parent company Alphabet, Inc., which funds the WHOand the CDC, owns pharmaceutical and biomedical companies, and itself receives hundreds of millions of dollars from vaccine manufacturers like GlaxoSmithKline, their actions go beyond conflict of interest to collusion.
Perhaps even more concerning is what YouTube’s new policy will do to hundreds of millions of users who face either censoring themselves or being entirely de-platformed. Millions who previously would have spoken up and out will now remain in silent complicity with an agenda deadset on covering up the harms being done by the COVID-19 vaccines, or covering up safer, natural alternatives. I cannot tell which is more egregious when it is all said and done: overt censorship or covert self-censorship?
Fundamentally, YouTube’s latest decision is a declaration of war against the truth and the public’s right to informed consent. But it will require the tacit consent and/or complicity of millions of users for them to be successful.
Will you remain or become part of the solution?
Sign up to be the first to know when our FREE SPEECH platform BE SOVEREIGN goes live soon HERE!
Coming from a journalism background, I can not believe how horrific mainstream media has become. You truly can’t trust it at all. It has become just like Lyme/MSIDS from the standpoint of having two standards: 1) mainstream, which is woefully inaccurate and truly hurting people 2) alternative, which is giving correct information and saving lives, but is mercilessly attacked by #1.
I keep hoping that perhaps the COVID debacle will open up more eyes to the corruption that’s being going on for over 40 years in Lymeland.
The people responsible for weaponizing and releasing the COVID19 bio-weapon against humanity are facing a criminal complaint on “crimes against humanity” at the International Criminal Court, says Dr. Richard Fleming, a medical doctor and attorney who is working in the case. Already, people from around the world have signed on, including a number of Holocaust survivors. Dr. Fleming urged viewers to get involved and ensure that those who sought to kill, steal, destroy and enslave with this diabolical tool known as SARS-CoV2. In the interview, Dr. Fleming also talks about his new book, already a best seller, exposing the true nature of COVID and what is really going on.
REALITY CHECK: Nurses Are Leaving Hospitals Due to “Unsafe Work Conditions” (USA Today)
By James Lyons Weiler
CLAIM: Nurses are leaving hospitals due to “unsafe work conditions”
A story has been circulating on social media started by a series of tweets by an organization known as “USA Today” that claimed that nurses were leaving hospitals across the United States due to “Unsafe Work Conditions”.
They cite a nurse, Bonnie Castillo, as having a simple “solution”:
USA Today also then claims that “Long before the pandemic, hospitals staffed at bare-bone levels to maximum profit, rather than at the level need to safely care for patients and the severity of their conditions”.
Second source reality check: According to Becker Hospital Reviews, hundreds of “healthcare workers” are leaving individual major hospital systems over vaccine mandates:
“The departures — announced one week after New York state’s mandate took effect requiring healthcare workers get at least one shot by Sept. 27 — included about two dozen leaders at the management level, or above, and represent under 2 percent of Northwell’s employees. With the departures, Northwell is reporting a 100 percent vaccinated workforce”
Third Source Reality Check:FierceHealthcare.com published a list started on Sept 24, 2021, last updated on October 8, 2021 that reports the number of employees that have left 31 hospitals over vaccine mandates.
“USA Today” has a history of spreading incorrect information on social media, especially about issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, in February, 2021, USA Today incorrectly reported that the US CDC was not inflating COVID-19 deaths. They also incorrectly reported that I spread misinformation in a speech I gave in Harrisburg, PA. In reality, USA Today had cited another source of misinformation that had failed to note the date of my speech and who updated their “fact check” after I pointed out to them that they had misunderstood the context of my correct claim on the 21%. The study to which I was referring did, in fact, report a 21% increase in serious adverse events in recipients of the Moderna vaccine. USA Today cited a source that misapplied that rate to another, later study.
Reality: Nurses and other ethical medical professionals are leaving unethical medical facilities due to vaccine requirements. Staffing shortages are, in fact, the direct result of vaccine requirements. If conditions in hospitals have now become “unsafe” due to staffing shortages, as has been alleged, the vaccine mandates are the root cause.
POPULAR RATIONALISM RULING: MOSTLY FALSE.
WHAT IS FALSE: USA Today is misleading its readership and the public on the important role of vaccine mandates are having in driving ethical physicians and medical professionals from unethical hospitals who have implemented vaccine requirements as a condition of employment. Also, USA Today failed to report that OSHA has yet to file a final ruling that protects employees from lawsuits over dismissals. To date, OSHA has only published an guidance and an exploratory analysis in the Federal Register.
WHAT IS TRUE: USA Today correctly reported that hospitals put profits before staff safety and patient wellness. The claim “Long before the pandemic, hospitals staffed at bare-bone levels to maximum profit, rather than at the level need to safely care for patients and the severity of their conditions” is true. After the Ebola outbreak of 2014, hospitals were funded to create readiness programs for the eventuality of a major pandemic coming to the United States. They implemented conditional workflows, including patient in/patient out pattern.
The public was asked by the US Government to give healthcare two weeks to get ready for the patients. Early on, we knew which co-morbid conditions meant that a case of COVID-19 was likely to be severe COVID-19. Hospitals have received trillions of dollars in Federal funds. Instead of working on a readiness program for COVID-19, patients who test positive have been sent home to serve as incubators of new variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.These patients have not been informed of readily available, effective protocols for in-home ambulatory care that reduce patient mortality risk.
_________________
**Comment**
A few more reality checks:
The real reason for canceled flights has been met with all kinds of excuses from bad weather to air traffic control problems. What isn’t being discussed are airline employees walking off the job due to “vaccine” mandates and severe adverse reactions and even deaths of pilots and flight attendants.
“It’s much bigger than people think,” the co-pilot allegedly said.
Not only that, flights are being diverted due to:
pilots with chest pains
passengers with chest pains forced an emergency landing too
a Seattle-based pilot was found dead on his floor from an embolism
flight attendants are not returning to active duty in “droves” following their shots; two were found dead after their shots
seven Atlanta-based flight attendants have already had breakthrough infections
a vaccinated pilot got a breakthrough infection and died of kidney failure
reports just keep coming in, with the airlines keeping their communications sealed Source
US Freedom Fighters is fighting back. This group of transportation industry employees has been fired for refusing the COVID jab, but have come together to fight mandates which strip citizens of their right to medical freedom. They invite anyone who cherishes freedom to move about the country and the world freely. Go here for video.
