Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

Bioweapons Official Accuses Fauci and Collins of ‘Denial & Deception’ on COVID Origins, The New Biosecurity State & Fauci’s Poor Memory

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/bioweapons-official-fauci-denial-deception-covid-origins

Key Bioweapons Official Publicly Accuses Fauci of ‘Denial and Deception’ on COVID Origins

In an interview with investigative journalist Paul D. Thacker, biodefense official Dr. Robert Kadlec alleged that key officials like Dr. Anthony Fauci and virologists who wrote the “Proximal Origin” paper knew COVID-19 likely originated in a lab but used classic “information operations” tactics to protect their careers and funding.

Key article excerpts:
  • Kadlec claims Fauci and Collins have been engaged in “denial and deception” about the virus’ origins.
  • Documents released in December by U.S. Right to Know prove Fauci and Collins are lying.
  • The interium U.S. Senate report was released under his watch in October and became the controversial exclusive by ProPublica/Vanity Fair.
  • As early as Feb. 2020, key virologists were privately acknowledging in emails that “this could have been a laboratory incident,” and the now infamous “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” paper in Nature Medicine was used to “downplay the lab-leak hypothesis,” and label anyone as a conspiracy theorist who suggested the virus may have come from a lab.
  • “I think what was driven here was reputational risk to NIH and to the two people that both advocated — Fauci and Collins — for unfettered, scientific research, meaning gain-of-function research,” he said.  Kadlec states that reputational risk between these two men and NIH is inseparable.
  • This important video shows that US Right to Know found an early draft of a 2018 Ecohealth DARPA proposal  which omits key points about their dangerous gain of function coronavirus research.  
  • Fauci is scheduled to appear before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic on Jan. 8 and Jan. 9 for a two-day transcribed interview regarding “the numerous controversies that have arisen during and after the pandemic.”  He will testify publicly before the subcommittee later this year.
  • Kadlec believes Collins played an even more prominent role than Fauci.
  • Kadlec has evidence from George Gao, the guy who was the director of the Chinese CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention], who published serially that this virus was not from the market.
  • The continued promotion of the “wet market” theory and zoonotic transmission is a red herring promoting misdirection, denial, and deception that even the Chinese have relented from.
  • The Senate committee investigation which yielded the HELP report made little mention of the NIH and no mention of Fauci or gain-of-function research but laid a lot of blame on China.
  • The deception is wide and deep, and includes Science Magazine’s editor-in-chief H. Holden Thorpe (once chancellor of UNC overseeing the University’s research including Ralph Barics, who resigned after UNC was caught in wide-spread academic fraud) who misled the entire scientific community by claiming that DEFUSE research “hardly posed a threat.”
  • But then there’s the science writers who amplified lies to the public which led to widespread censorship on social media, mainstream media, and in research which is still occurring, allowing for years of deception.  Now, many of these writers are fleeing Twitter due to be humiliated.
  • These writers and authorities don’t want to admit they got it wrong because it isn’t the only thing they got wrong.  Once the broken seam is pulled the entire story unravels.
  • The best way to avoid this in the future is to figure out how this all started through close inspection.  (See link for article)

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-new-biosecurity-state/

The New Biosecurity State

Former UN Top Official Ramesh Thakur on How Science Became Dogma

Transcript of Ramesh Thakur interview with Jan Jekielek, American Thought Leaders, Epoch TV, 14 December 2023

Jan Jekielek: Ramesh Thakur, such a pleasure to have you on American Thought Leaders.

Ramesh Thakur: It’s a pleasure to be here.

Mr. Jekielek: You wrote the book, Our Enemy, the Government, provocatively titled. You said if 10 percent of medical professionals rejected seemingly wrong directives coming from on high, that the whole structure of compliance would have collapsed. Please explain why you believe that.

Mr. Thakur: Sure. One of the features of current society is the rise of the professional associations and the regulatory colleges that regulate the people practicing in their professions; accountants, lawyers, and doctors. During the Covid era, these regulatory bodies were very useful for the state and were instrumentalized to ensure compliance. Any doctor who publicly questioned what was being demanded by the public health authorities and the colleges could be disciplined. (See link for article)

And Fauci is up to his old tricks of using selective amnesia when the questions get tough.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/fauci-said-he-didnt-recall-many-details-house-panel-chairman

Fauci Said He Didn’t Recall Many Details: House Panel Chairman

1/8/24

Dr. Anthony Fauci appeared in Washington on Jan. 8

Dr. Anthony Fauci said a surprising number of times that he could not recall when he was asked questions about the COVID-19 pandemic in a close-door session with a Congressional committee, top lawmakers said on Jan. 8.

There may be over 100 or so, so far, ‘I don’t recall’, ‘I don’t remember’ answers,” Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) told reporters on Capitol Hill after Dr. Fauci answered questions for seven hours.

Dr. Fauci, the longtime head of the U.S. National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) until around the end of 2022, was testifying to the U.S. House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. He was speaking in the private session under oath for the first time since he left office. The last time he spoke under oath, he also said he didn’t recall in response to a number of questions. Dr. Fauci was accompanied by two personal lawyers and two government lawyers.  (See link for article)

______________
Unbelievable until you understand their egos and their tactics.

For more:

It must also be mentioned that the denial and vilification of effective, safe, cheap treatments were available from the beginning, demonstrating that this was not a mistakeMany good doctors were not only censored for attempting to get this information to the public, but actively pursued and persecuted.

Fraudulent research was purposely designed to make these treatments appear dangerous or ineffective.  “Authorities” and their payed off minions wanted ONLY the dangerous, ineffective, gene therapies to be available and they continue to push these, even covering up damage, and vilifying anyone who questions the narrative.

This course of action killed untold numbers of people, and has been called democide, or death by government.

For more:

Woman Battling Lyme Disease Seeks Medical Assistance in Dying

https://www.brighteon.com/283acc80-e3c9-413b-98a8-4a61c1aa452b  Video Here (Approx. 11 Min)

 Woman battling Lyme disease seeks Medical Assistance in Dying

Alexa Lavoie: Stephanie Lavoie

Dec. 2023

Unable to work, Lavoie has sought out alternative treatments when the health-care system failed her.  She needs round the clock care but is unable to afford it anymore.

Last year a 22 year old Montreal woman died by suicide when her Lyme/MSIDS became unbearable.  The parents state she was a victim of a failed health-care system.  Quebec’s chief coroner ordered a public inquiry into her death.  She suffered from sleep disorders, auditory hallucinations, and personality changes.

Former Nurse: 90% of Hospital Deaths Attributed to COVID Treatment Protocols

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-single-most-important-interview

The single most important interview I’ve ever done: former Kaiser nurse Gail Macrae

90% of the COVID deaths in hospitals were attributed to COVID treatment protocols. ICU doc estimated up to an 80% increase in mortality due to the COVID vaccine.

Executive summary

My interview with former Kaiser Permanente Santa Rosa nurse Gail Macrae is the single most devastating interview I’ve done since I first started speaking out against the COVID vaccine in May 2021.

Key points of the interview include:

  • Hospitals were actually empty when the press told us they were full.
  • 90% or more of the COVID deaths were actually caused by the treatment protocols dictated from above, not the virus. There were both early treatments as well as inpatient treatments available that reduced the COVID death rate by over 90%.
  • The COVID vaccines increased all-cause mortality in hospitals by up to 80% according to one ICU doctor I spoke to who worked in the same hospital as Gail and made meticulous notes on patient outcomes.
  • One of the potential reasons people believed that there was a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” is that the EMR systems were programmed to default all COVID cases to unvaccinated and nurses weren’t told how to change it.
  • After the vaccines rolled out for an age group is when the hospitals started seeing very unusual things they’ve never seen or rarely seen before for that age group.
  • Doctors are still afraid to speak out.

Bottom line: it wasn’t the virus that caused the pandemic. It was our response to the virus (top-down dictated treatment protocols and vaccination directives) that caused nearly all the morbidity and mortality. It was all preventable had we listened to the people that our government wanted to silence.

Today, there is still a total lack of transparency of what happened in hospitals in 2021 after the shots rolled out. If the protocols and vaccinations were a huge success, why aren’t we seeing any hospital publish their numbers?

(See link for interview and article)

____________

**Comment**

Kirsch states his doctor, nurse, and paramedic friends corroborate what is said in the video.  I must report that I’ve seen and heard the same.

This will continue to happen unless we educate ourselves and others and refuse to comply.

For more:

Aluminum Revisited: No Enhanced Seroprotection & Raises Risk of Infection

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/systematic-review-finds-no-evidence?

Systematic Review Finds No Evidence of Enhanced Seroprotection from Aluminum Adjuvants in Vaccines

With no evidence of benefit, it is medical malfeasance and misinformation to claim they help vaccines induce an immune response in humans.

 

A systematic review of 102 studies on the biological effects of aluminum adjuvants compared to placebos in humans found aluminum-containing vaccines (ACVs) failed to provide superior seroprotection and, according to the authors, leaving recipients at increased potential risk of adverse events known to exist with aluminum exposure and zero benefit.

After noting that post-study vaccination of clinical trial participants makes it impossible to assess them long-term health consequences of ACVs (“aluminium adjuvant has been administered to both the experimental and control groups in the vast majority of randomised clinical trials on HPV vaccines, thus masking aluminium adjuvant’s potentially harmful effect” and that a previous study had found worse seroprotection following aluminum-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccines, the study authors wanted to know: what, generally speaking, are the effects of ACVs vs. placebo?  (See link for article)

Study here:  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226993/

Simply put: aluminum adjuvants don’t work.

Yet another example of ZERO benefits but increased risks.

_____________

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635311/

Adjuvant-dependent effects on the safety and efficacy of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines during heterologous infection by a SARS-related coronavirus

Abstract

Inactivated whole virus SARS-CoV-2 vaccines adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide (Alum) are among the most widely used COVID-19 vaccines globally and have been critical to the COVID-19 pandemic response. Although these vaccines are protective against homologous virus infection in healthy recipients, the emergence of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants and the presence of large zoonotic reservoirs provide significant opportunities for vaccine breakthrough, which raises the risk of adverse outcomes including vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD). To evaluate this possibility, we tested the performance of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (iCoV2) in combination with Alum against either homologous or heterologous coronavirus challenge in a mouse model of coronavirus-induced pulmonary disease. Consistent with human results, iCoV2 + Alum protected against homologous challenge. However, challenge with a heterologous SARS-related coronavirus, Rs-SHC014-CoV (SHC014), up to at least 10 months post-vaccination, resulted in VAERD in iCoV2 + Alum-vaccinated animals, characterized by pulmonary eosinophilic infiltrates, enhanced pulmonary pathology, delayed viral clearance, and decreased pulmonary function. In contrast, vaccination with iCoV2 in combination with an alternative adjuvant (RIBI) did not induce VAERD and promoted enhanced SHC014 clearance. Further characterization of iCoV2 + Alum-induced immunity suggested that CD4+ T cells were a major driver of VAERD, and these responses were partially reversed by re-boosting with recombinant Spike protein + RIBI adjuvant. These results highlight potential risks associated with vaccine breakthrough in recipients of Alum-adjuvanted inactivated vaccines and provide important insights into factors affecting both the safety and efficacy of coronavirus vaccines in the face of heterologous virus infections.

_______________

**Comment**

According to this:

Ribi adjuvants are emulsions of salt water, a detergent, two bacterial products and the approved adjuvant squalene. Ribi interacts with immune cells to enhance the release of cytokines (immune molecules) and antigen processing.

The article gives three examples of VAERD known about since the 1960s:

  • large numbers of breakthrough pediatric measles cases occurred years after vaccination that were “atypical” in that the children had all measles symptoms, including rash, but the measles virus could not be isolated from them.

  • infants who received the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine were later infected by RSV and developed VAERD.

  • severe dengue disease outbreaks in dengue-vaccinated children who had previously taken a dengue vaccine.

COVID-19 vaccination-induced VAEDS was already recognized as a complication by the summer of 2020, while the “vaccines” were still under evaluation.

Aluminum, the main ingredient in alum, is associated with many ill effects including injection site inflammation, endocrine disruption, and damage to the digested, cardiovascular and pulmonary systems.  Clinical and immunologic similarities between vaccine-induced illness in mice and VAERD in people both involve type 2 inflammation and the infiltration of immune system cells into the lungs.

A 2021 study on the aluminum content of 13 common childhood vaccines  found that only three contained quantities of alum indicated by the manufacturer. Six had (statistically) significantly more alum and four had less.

A 2019 investigative report detailed how the U.S. government concealed expert witness testimony that vaccines can and do indeed cause autism in some children.

The CDC website currently makes no mention of the expert testimony, published findings or similar studies, or numerous cases in which the government has paid damages in vaccine court to children who — according to the vaccine court and medical experts — got autism as a result of their vaccine injuries. The CDC states unequivocally that “vaccines do not cause autism.”

Another version of “safe and effective,” and “persistent Lyme doesn’t exist.”

For more:

Overview of WHO Negotiations

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/an-overview-of-the-who-negotiations?

An Overview of the WHO Negotiations

After nearly two years of reporting on the WHO, many people have requested that I provide an overview of what is going on with the WHO negotiations. Please share this information far and wide.

 

IMPORTANT POINTS:

The best way to understand this issue is to watch the videos below.

Many people have confused the different documents that are involved.

  1. The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (2022 and 2024)

  2. The proposed “Pandemic Agreement,” which most people refer to as the “Pandemic Treaty,” but is really a Framework Convention (which is a really, really bad idea).

THE 2022 AMENDMENTS TO THE IHR

The WHO has fraudulently claimed that it adopted amendments to the International Health Regulations on May 28, 2022, but it never bothered to actually conduct a vote.

This should be a worldwide scandal, but nearly everyone is ignoring this blatant fraud. CLICK HERE FOR DETAILS


THE 2024 AMENDMENTS TO THE IHR

Over 300 amendments to the International Health Regulations are currently being negotiated. These negotiations have been conducted in secret for over one year. The originally proposed amendments are available HERENo updated or revised versions have ever been made public.

The deadline for the WHO to present the final package of targeted amendments is January 27, 2024. They have announced publicly that they are NOT going to meet their deadline. This should be all over the news, but practically no one is talking about it.

NO final version of the amendments has been provided. To learn more about the fast approaching deadline, CLICK HERE.

The next meeting of the Working Group for amendments to the International Health Regulations (WGIHR) is scheduled for February 5-9, 2024LINK

Go to link for details.

For more: