Congress’ Lip Service Against ‘Pandemic’ Treaty & WHO Focused on Profitable Disease X
4/2/23
Senate Resolution 81 and ‘No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act’ Rots in Committee
Congress is simply doing lip-service in protecting the public from global tyrants while the Biden Administration is all in to have our rights taken away.
Without intervention, we hand over our rights to the WHO to do the following:
- Define the next pandemic
- Determine lockdowns
- Surveillance power
- Determine treatments
- Vaccine Mandates
- Vaccine distribution
- Vaccine IP and profits
- Redistribution of …..everything – all resources.
The Louisiana Senate has passed legislation (SB 133) to make the state independent from directives and mandates that originate from international institutions including the WHO, UN, and WEF. It states that the WHO, UN, and WEF shall have no jurisdiction or power within the state of Louisiana. No rule, regulation, fee, tax, policy, or mandate of any kind of the WHO, UN, and the WEF shall be enforced or implemented by the state of Louisiana or any agency, department, board, commission, political subdivision, governmental entity of the state, parish, municipality, or any other political entity. It now needs to be passed by the House of Representatives and signed into law by the governor.
The anti-commandeering doctrine, under the U.S. Constitution’s Tenth Amendment, holds that the federal government cannot commandeer state and local resources for its own purposes, it follows that international bodies would not be able to either.
“We have watched a horror story unfold in front of us as time has shown that the ‘recommendations’ and coercive regulations from outside organizations such as the WHO have harmed hundreds of thousands of Americans who took a vaccine that they were told was safe and effective. Now, we are witnessing severe, long-term side effects and countless deaths because the ‘experts’ were wrong.” ~ Louisiana State Senator Valarie Hodges
The video also reviews history of how internal documents show the corrupt WHO paid sexual abuse victims in the Congo $250 each to cover up their crimes.
https://brownstone.org/articles/pandemics-a-business-opportunity/
Pandemics: A Business Opportunity
Relax for a few minutes, sit back, and pretend morals and business ethics are redundant. Then imagine an infallible, risk-free business scheme in which you get to create the market, decide the product, manage its regulation, then have the power to confine people to their homes or remove their income until they submit to buying it. And no one can sue you or take you to court if it all goes wrong.
No legitimate government would allow that within its borders (except perhaps a few family-run or completely totalitarian ones), so aim higher and make this international, as it then ceases to be fantasy. All this is being negotiated within the WHO pandemic documents to be agreed by your government in two months’ time.
So, imagine:
- Your organization will be a public-private partnership, so using taxpayer money but guided by the private sector.
- You spin a story that a series of plagues are about to engulf humanity, exponentially increasing in frequency and severity (your partners own the media, so don’t be troubled by reality).
- Then use public money to set up a surveillance network guaranteed to find virus variants (i.e. go and find nature, you can’t miss it).
- Governments have agreed ahead of time to give you power to control healthcare policy when you decide these variants pose a threat (not harm, just a threat). They have agreed that this includes border closures, restrictions on daily life of their citizens, and of course mandated vaccination (in return for them ‘getting freedom back’).
- Then transfer these virus variants to laboratories and pharmaceutical companies of your choice (your friends and supporters, who will in return give your organization some money).
- The pharmaceutical companies are ready: They have been receiving free billions from taxpayers annually under the same scheme, to keep their production lines ready to profit from the market you are about to create.
- Your Pharma-investor sponsors also sponsor disease modelers willing to produce the most fantastic death figures to shore up public compliance. They do this.
- You then use your powers to impose these lockdowns and insist that a 100-day vaccine must be rushed out to save hapless humanity and allow a return to an “inter-pandemic” period.
- Once your chosen companies rush out the vaccine, you get to control the regulatory bit (more money changes hands), bypassing pesky safety trials and those interminable ethics reviews.
- All the while, you can note any dissenting opinions that may reduce your market size; your governmental partners having already agreed to deal with them.
- Once you have the profit flowing, you get to decide when the profiteering can stop (think “respiratory virus vaccine” and more sponsored modeling – rapid waning of efficacy so lots of boosters to keep humanity safe).
- All the while, you have ensured freedom from liability for your pharma partners and your own regulatory process.
- You, of course, have no liability either – you are above any national jurisdiction. You don’t even have to pay tax to anyone!
(See link for article)
________________
**Comment**
I highly recommend reading, “For Some, There is Not Enough Infectious Disease in the World – So They Want to Pay You to Be Infected.”
Within this article you will learn of the egregious violations of human rights that have occurred historically in medical research. Many state Lyme disease falls into this category as well.
COVID is a perfect example of how these experiments have shaped current ethic standards – or lack there of.
“They serve as a grim reminder of what can occur when ethical considerations are sidelined for the sake of scientific inquiry or under the guise of political and racial ideologies…..these best practices appear to have all but been forgotten by Vaccine Manufacturers and Public Health.” ~ James Lyons Weiler
In short, a recent Guardian article spotlights Australia’s the Doherty Clinical Trials (DCT), a new facility dedicated to human challenge trials designed to expedite the understanding of diseases and the development of vaccines and treatments by intentionally exposing consenting participants to infectious agents or pathogens in a controlled environment.
The trials, which focus on a variety of diseases, from influenza to malaria and gonorrhea, involve compensating volunteers, typically young adults and travelers, for their participation – demonstrating enticement to consent and potential long-term health impacts.
The article points out glaring problems:
- lab leaks
- generation of more virulent or resistant strains of pathogens
- the rapid deployment and approval of dangerous gene therapy injections falsely labeled as ‘vaccines’
- the deliberate exploitation of socioeconomic vulnerabilities through financial enticement on populations already marginalized by the healthcare system
- risk of long-term chronic illnesses due to the long-term impacts of pathogen exposure – known as pathogenic priming
- repeated exposures to infection and then injection will likely cause autoimmunity as history has shown
Weiler calls for a ban on human challenge trials which is rooted in the principle of “first, do no harm,” a cornerstone of medical ethics that appears to be all but forgotten.
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 