I preface the following information with an important topic that many are unaware of: manufacturers often use other vaccines as “placebos” in vaccine trials. This happened recently according to NVIC when a Brazilian physician died in the COVID-19 vaccine trial: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/10/brazilian-doctor-dies-participating-in-astrazenecas-covid-19-vaccine-clinical-trial/
While many were quick to point out that according to unnamed sources, he died of COVID-19, the following was discovered:
It has since been reported that the man did receive the meningococcal vaccine used as a placebo in the trial instead of the experimental coronavirus vaccine, although no official confirmation has been released by AstraZeneca, which has cited privacy concerns for not making more information available to the public.1
Hopefully it is quite clear that using another vaccine as a placebo muddies the waters when determining vaccine safety.
The following details how ICAN is trying to change this important issue by demanding the FDA mandate that all clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines use a placebo control, not another vaccine.
|The generals will tell you that wars are often won long before the battle actually begins or any shot is fired through planning, preparation, and foresight. ICAN’s tireless work over the last three years with regard to all vaccines has had a significant impact on the ongoing clinical trials and potential approval process for COVID-19 vaccines. This update provides a bit of that history and describes some of ICAN’s legal efforts with regard to a COVID-19 vaccine.|
Companies assure their products are safe because they do not want to be sued for damages or get fined by regulators. When it comes to vaccines, however, neither of these checks exist. Unlike other consumer products, the companies earning billions of dollars from vaccines cannot be sued for harms caused by their vaccines; and the federal department responsible for assuring vaccine safety — the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) — does not fulfill this duty because it would conflict with its duty to promote vaccines and defend against any claim that a vaccine causes harm in vaccine court.
In short, there is nobody guarding the henhouse. It is in this vacuum that ICAN began its work in 2017. The logical place to begin was reviewing the clinical trials relied upon by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to license childhood vaccines. After conducting this review, ICAN sent a legal demand to HHS — the parent department of FDA — on October 12, 2017 asking it to “[p]lease explain how HHS justifies licensing any pediatric vaccine without first conducting a long-term clinical trial in which the rate of adverse reactions is compared between the subject group and a control group receiving an inert placebo?”
HHS responded on January 18, 2018, in a letter reviewed and approved by the FDA, claiming that “[c]ontrary to statements made on page two of your letter, many pediatric vaccines have been investigated in clinical trials that included a placebo.” HHS’s response also claimed that safety in these trials was reviewed for a significant duration, without specifying any duration. HHS and the FDA were about to have egg on their face.
ICAN responded on December 31, 2018 with a detailed chart containing every pediatric vaccine, citing to FDA documents, which indisputably proves that it was categorically false for HHS and the FDA to claim that “many pediatric vaccines have been investigated in clinical trials that included a placebo.” The reality is that none – save one – of the pediatric vaccines was licensed based on a placebo controlled clinical trial! ICAN’s response also pointed out the short safety review periods in these trials. ICAN even graciously provided HHS and the FDA an additional opportunity to provide proof that these clinical trials did include a placebo control. No proof has ever been provided.
This exchange between ICAN and HHS also covered a wide range of vaccine safety topics beyond the clinical trials used to justify licensure of pediatric vaccines. HHS could not, for any of these topics, provide proof or assurance that vaccines are safe or that they have been properly safety tested.
To assure that every single scientist within the CDC, FDA, and NIH who has any involvement with vaccines knows about the information in these letters, ICAN sent every single one of those scientists their own package containing a copy of ICAN’s letter exchange with HHS.
ICAN has also continued to relentlessly pursue the FDA about the inadequacy of the clinical trials it relied upon to license the pediatric vaccines currently injected into millions of children. For example, in a prior update, we explained our efforts concerning the only two Hepatitis B vaccines given to babies in America on their first day of life, including the petition we filed with the FDA demanding it withdraw the licenses for these vaccines until it conducts long-term placebo control trials of these products to assure their safety. ICAN also sued the FDA numerous times to force it to release clinical trial reports for other vaccines, including, for example, the chicken pox vaccine, which we explained in another recent legal update.
The FDA is acutely aware that ICAN will not hesitate to sue if its reasonable demands regarding vaccine safety are ignored. In that regard, when the Phase III trial for AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford’s COVID-19 vaccine was underway in England using another vaccine (Menveo) as a control (instead of a placebo), we filed a forceful petition demanding that the FDA mandate that all clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines use a placebo control as well as track safety long-term in a properly sized trial.
Nine days after ICAN filed its petition, on June 30, 2020, the FDA changed course and issued emergency guidance to industry that all COVID-19 clinical trials must use a placebo control.
ICAN, however, was not done fighting to assure that these clinical trials are properly conducted. On July 17, 2020, ICAN sued the FDA in federal court demanding the entire clinical trial report for Menveo, just in case the agency was considering permitting this vaccine as a control in the AstraZeneca trial to be conducted in the United States. On July 20, 2020, ICAN also filed a forceful amended petition with the FDA thanking it for requiring a placebo control group but demanding, among other things, that it also require that these clinical trials track all adverse events during the entire duration of the trial – not just for a limited time period.
Not long thereafter, in mid-September, in a highly unusual move, the full clinical trial protocols for the COVID-19 vaccines for which ICAN filed its petitions were released to the public. See copies for each of the manufacturer’s vaccines: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson. Those protocols revealed that some of ICAN’s demands regarding the duration for tracking vaccine safety had been met.
Not fully satisfied, ICAN filed superseding petitions for the four COVID-19 vaccines currently undergoing Phase III clinical trials in the United States on October 16, 2020. A link to each petition is available here: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson. Therein, ICAN repeats the vaccine safety demands that have still not been fulfilled. If these additional demands are not met, ICAN has reserved the right to take the FDA to court to enforce these demands.
ICAN’s legal team, headed by Aaron Siri, in addition to the above, has also taken various other steps with regard to COVID-19 vaccines. For example, the legal team filed a formal demand for the removal of the head of the purported “independent” board overseeing the clinical trials of the leading COVID-19 vaccines because of his incestuous conflicts with pharmaceutical companies.
ICAN has also served dozens of Freedom of Information Act requests on the CDC, FDA, and NIH seeking information regarding COVID-19 vaccines, including, for example, requests that resulted in obtaining documents which substantiated that officials within NIH stand to earn millions of dollars from the sales of a COVID-19 vaccine. As another example, ICAN has also received over 1,000 pages of emails sent by Dr. Fauci and is in the process of obtaining thousands more. ICAN has also released a “Should I Receive a COVID-19 Vaccine?” flyer and has added a “Report a COVID-19 Vaccine Injury” link to its website and is launching a broad public campaign around this issue.
There are numerous other legal and non-legal efforts ICAN is engaged in with regard to COVID-19 vaccines that are not yet ready to be discussed here but will be featured in future updates.
Just as the pharmaceutical companies will never rest when it comes to promoting and selling their vaccine products, we will never rest in exposing the truth regarding these products or in demanding full transparency and full informed consent for any and all vaccines.
If you would like to provide the FDA a comment in support or against any of the petitions we have filed with the FDA regarding COVID-19 vaccines, you can do so here: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson
|Stand for vaccine truth and help us keep winning with your tax-deductible gift of $20, $30, $50, or $100 or more today!|
Not only will pharmaceutical companies developing and marketing COVID-19 vaccines be shielded from what should be their liability in the civil court system, but federal compensation will likely be difficult to obtain, as it is in the existing vaccine court created under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986
The establishment of a preemptive COVID vaccine court could be a sign that the government foresees many lawsuits related to this fast-tracked vaccine in the near future
The expansion of a federal vaccine court to include makers of experimental COVID-19 vaccines allows the irresponsible sale and marketing of vaccines that have been poorly tested and formulated because the manufacturers have no liability and “nothing to lose”