The only reason this treatment is ‘controversial’ is because our ‘public authorities’ have purposely promoted biased and flawed research. They have beat this drum on that flawed and biased research so hard that the results of this study, many others, and the success of doctors globally probably won’t make a bit of difference as the word is out: HCQ is controversial so you best not use it or else!  They want everyone to use their lucrative, expensive, but ineffective anti-viral Remdesivir from Gilead Science.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/study-finds-84-fewer-hospitalizations-for-patients-treated-with-controversial-drug-hydroxychloroquine

Study finds 84% fewer hospitalizations for patients treated with controversial drug hydroxychloroquine

by Andrew Mark Miller, | November 25, 2020

A peer-reviewed study measuring the effectiveness of a controversial drug cocktail that includes hydroxychloroquine concluded that the treatment lowered hospitalizations and mortality rates of coronavirus patients. 

The study, set to be published in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents in December, determined that “Low-dose hydroxychloroquine combined with zinc and azithromycin was an effective therapeutic approach against COVID-19.” (See link for article)

________________________

**Comment**

Particulars of the study:

  • 141 diagnosed patients were treated with low-dose HCQ, zinc, and azithromycin
  • 377 diagnosed patients were in the control group – not given the treatment
  • odds of hospitalization of the treated group was 84% less than the control group
  • 1 patient in the treated group died compared to 13 in the control group

The findings of the study are in complete alignment of what doctors globally have been trying to say for months but have been effectively censored by mainstream media, which is completely bought out:

The reason for this misinformation campaign against a safe, effective, and cheap treatment is due to the severe conflicts of interests of our public ‘authorities’.  

I written about this maligning treatment phenomenon before with Lyme/MSIDS:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/26/cdc-playbook-learning-from-lyme/

What they’ve done with the HCQ treatment is quite similar to their maligning of IV antibiotics for Lyme disease – to the point nearly all doctors are scared witless of using it anymore.  Doctors are also afraid to use HCQ now for the same reasons.

They’ve also pumped out biased, flawed research (just like they do with Lyme/MSIDS) that is done to cast a bad light on HCQ:

 
Excerpt:
Dr. Meryl Nass has uncovered a hornet’s nest of government sponsored Hydroxychloroquine experiments that were designed to kill severely ill, Covid-19 hospitalized patients.
 
On June 14th Dr. Nass first identified two Covid-19 experiments in which massive, high toxic doses – four times higher than safe of hydroxychloroquine were being given to severely ill hospitalized patients in intensive care units.

Numerous doctors have given explicit instructions on using HCQ, which should be used early on with COVID, as well as combined with zinc and azithromycin.  The flawed studies used high doses of HCQ on the severest of patients without zinc and azithromycin and later on in the disease.  

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/24/dr-oz-interviews-dr-didier-raoult-on-hydroxychloroquine-study-for-covid-19/

Then there’s Dr. Zelenko, a New York doctor, who’s successfully treated 1,450 COVID-19 patients with a 99% success rate using a cocktail of hydroxychloroquine, Zinc Sulfate and Azithromycin:  https://techstartups.com/2020/04/21/dr-vladimir-zelenko-now-treated-1450-coronavirus-patients-2-deaths-using-hydroxychloroquine-99-99-success-rate-latest-video-interview/  Video with Zelenko in link.

%d bloggers like this: