Why is CDC Scaring Us To Death?

November 3, 2020

https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2020/10/30/why-is-cdc-scaring-us-to-death/

Why is CDC Scaring Us To Death?

by jameslyonsweiler

10/30/2020

The “Surge” being seen in countries that use flu vaccines can reasonably be attributed to mismanagement of our public health statistics on respiratory viruses – and due to immune damage from the influenza vaccine.

TOMORROW IS HALLOWEEN – All Hallow’s Eve – a religious traditional where ghouls and goblins roam the streets in search of something… tricks, or treats.

CDC’s latest trick is diagnostic substitution of “Influenza” for “COVID19” and it’s scaring people literally to death.

Let’s line up some facts:

Fact 1. CDC Uses False Numbers for Influenza to Scare People. CDC used to track deaths from “Influenza” separately – until 2014, the year in which they came up with the “Pneumonia+Influenza” or “Influenza Disease” hat-trick. By combining deaths from pneumonia untested into “Influenza Disease” they have been successfully scaring Americans over “the Flu” to push the flu vaccine. [Read a full article on this here – the article that was Censored by LinkedIN.]

In 2014, 11% of cases of “Influenza Disease” were bona fide influenza cases.

In this graph, I show the estimated number of bona fide influenza cases per year after 2014 combined with the reported number of influenza cases.

Influenza and Pneumonia Cases 2010-2017 season.
The next time someone says “55,000” or “80,000” deaths from infleunza per year, share this article with them.

Fact 2. In 2020, Influenza is Missing. The next fact to consider is that CDC appears to have abandoned tracking influenza in 2020. How convenient. Look at this series of Influenza Cases by type per year. Look at the small insert number of positive tests reported per week – they represent the onset of the flu season for the next season coming one. We’ll be comparing those insert figures to the data available as of Oct 30, 2020 (Week 44 of 52).

See the Insert Fall Weeks with Positive Tests Reported Each Year

Now look at the same figure for the 2019-2020 season (data available up to October 17, 2020, this year).

Influenza Positive Cases Reported 2019-2020

Fact 3. Studies have shown that the influenza vaccine appears to make people more susceptible to coronavirus infection and infection by other non-influenza viral infections. There’s the Wolf study that supposes the mechanism by which coronavirus infection is more likely following infleuza vaccine is “Viral Interference”

Wolff GG. Influenza Vaccination and Respiratory Virus Interference Among Department of Defense Personnel During the 2017-2018 Influenza Season. Vaccine 2020;38 (2):350-354.

I suspect it’s thimerosal, which inhibits the protein ERAP1, necessary for our immune systems to fold proteins properly in response to new pathogens. (Source: “Screening Identifies Thimerosal as a Selective Inhibitor of Endoplasmic Reticulum Aminopeptidase 1“).

See also Ben Cowling’s study “Increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infections associated with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine”

Denialists will say “there’s no evidence this is true for COVID19”. Fact: there is no evidence that it is NOT true for COVID19, either, and COVID19 is a coronavirus responsible for respiratory illness. Fact-checker, check yourself.

I’ve shown in previous posts that diseases of unknown origin got their start in 1976 with the onset of national whole-population influenza vaccine efforts, and also that the uptake in infleunza vaccines in a given year increases the likelihood of influenza for the next two years. So there is evidence – detectable at the population level – of harm to the immune system from influenza vaccination program.

We also know from animal studies in past attempts to develop coronavirus vaccines that coronavirus vaccines tend to cause disease enhancement – i.e., they make infection from coronaviruses worse. Yet Fauci and Moderna and FDA and all vaccine manufacturers decided to skip this essential step in their rush to get a COVID19 vaccine developed, making guinea pigs out of the human beings.

So let’s put it all together:

There is no way that CDC is getting COVID19 numbers right

They are likely conflating COVID19 “presumed” cases with non-tested cases of “influenza disease” (remember, that influenza + non-tested pneumonia from bacteria, RSV, and SV and other Coronaviruses).

The “Surge” being seen in countries that use flu vaccines can reasonably be attributed to mismanagement of our public health statistics on respiratory viruses and due to immune damage from the influenza vaccine.

To me, it seems CDC is the largest threat to public health in the United States.

Trick or treat?

You can watch a video on Facebook where Dr. Jack discusses the CDC data.

____________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/07/16/huge-covid-case-counting-deception-at-the-cdc/

FYI: The CDC has done this before and got away with it:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/22/the-2009-swine-flu-scam-murderous-anthony-fauci-betrays-public-trust-again/  

In short, our public ‘authorities’ created a fake swine flu pandemic so people would take a dangerous vaccine that they created, but because the number of infected was so low they secretly stopped counting cases of Swine Flu.

Excerpt:

Attkisson wrote an article about this scandal, and it was published on the CBS News website. However, the next, bigger step—putting out the story on CBS television news—was waylaid. No deal. And CBS shut down any future investigation on the subject. Attkisson’s article died on the vine. No other major news outlet in the world picked up her article and ran with it deeper into the rabbit hole.

To this day the public still believes there was an actual swine flu pandemic.  

According to this article, WHO estimated by May 2006 it had killed only 100 people.  Dr. Fauci also falsely stated serious adverse events for the fast-tracked swine flu vaccine was “very, very, very rare,” yet cases of narcolepsy came pouring in.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/30/anthony-fauci-40-years-of-lies-from-azt-to-remdesivir/

As to the question: “Why is the CDC scaring us to death?” :

Category:

Activism, Viruses

Comments Off on Why is CDC Scaring Us To Death?

Success of Prescription & Alternative Medicine Lyme Treatments

https://www.treatlyme.net/guide/antibiotic-alternative-medicines-for-lyme

what_works_to_treat_Lyme_feature

Success of Prescription & Alternative Medicine Lyme Treatments

By Dr. Mary Ross

In my Lyme Q&A webinars and my clinical practice at Marty Ross MD Healing Arts, I answer questions about which treatments work best to recover from chronic Lyme.

Which prescription or herbal antibiotics really work for chronic Lyme disease and how long do they take? What about alternative medicine Lyme disease treatments like:

  • Rife machines,
  • stem cell therapy,
  • ozone,
  • hyperbaric oxygen,
  • hyperthermia,
  • supportive oligonucleotide therapy (SOT),
  • low dose immunotherapy (LDI), or
  • IV hydrogen peroxide?

(Go to link for article)

______________________

**Comment**

Dr. Ross states that in the past he would have had to rely solely upon his clinical experience to address the issue of what works in treating Lyme/MSIDS as the NIH stopped funding clinical research on Lyme disease treatments over 15 years ago and only had studies looking at short term antibiotic use of three months or less.

In this article; however, he utilizes not only his clinical experience but that of MyLymeData, a registry of over 12,000 patients who submit information about their experience with treatment.  Learn more or sign up to participate in MyLymeData at lymedisease.org.

In brief:

  • 76% of those that got well used prescription antibiotics but that this took a year or more to accomplish.
  • patients did best when working with an ILADS trained doctor
  • patients found numerous other alternative therapies helpful (see Ross’ article for the breakdown)
  • Dr. Ross states that the results match his clinical experience 
  • Ross also found that hyperthermia benefits lasted only 2-3 months
  • Ross’ review of the science leads him to believe that ozone, hydrogen peroxide and other oxygen therapies do not kill germs due to anti-oxidants in the blood working as killing neutralizers, but that patients often feel better due to helping the mitochondria.  
  • Ross feels stem cell therapy is an expensive disappointment.
  • He finds those using Rife get benefit 35% of the time.
  • He feels CBD from cannabis is not a good germ killer in humans but that it can treat symptoms.
  • He is skeptical of both SOT and LDI.
  • He also lists many other issues Lyme/MSIDS patients experience (please see article)

All in all, a great informative article.  I’m so thankful whenever doctors write about their clinical experience as there is so little out there on what works. The fact that patients and Dr. Ross are stating the same things is also quite helpful and fruitful.  

We may not have NIH funded studies but we have experience on our side.  

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/02/13/lyme-disease-treatment/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/01/new-dapsone-study-breaking-biofilm/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/26/new-treatments-for-lyme-disease-on-the-horizon/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/14/peer-reviewed-study-confirms-what-we-knew-all-along-longer-antibiotic-treatment-duration-is-associated-with-better-treatment-response-for-lyme-disease/

 

 

Category:

Herbs, Lyme, research, Treatment

Comments Off on Success of Prescription & Alternative Medicine Lyme Treatments

Study Finds Two Ways to Improve Lyme Testing

November 2, 2020

https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/9/11/366

The Platelet Fraction Is a Novel Reservoir to Detect Lyme Borrelia in Blood

by Victoria P. Sanderson 1, Iain L. Mainprize 1, Lisette Verzijlenberg 1, Cezar M. Khursigara 2 and Melanie K. B. Wills 1,*
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2020, 9(11), 366; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9110366
Received: 16 September 2020 / Revised: 23 October 2020 / Accepted: 27 October 2020 / Published: 29 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Biology of Leptospira, Borrelia and Other Spirochetes)
Simple Summary
To diagnose Lyme disease, a patient’s blood is tested for antibodies that develop as part of the immune response. This can lead to cases being missed or inadequately treated. An ideal test would directly detect the Lyme disease bacteria, Borrelia, to provide better clinical guidance. In this study, we aimed to improve the methods currently used to find Borrelia in human blood, and identified two opportunities for optimization. We demonstrate that the container most commonly used to collect blood (EDTA) decreases Borrelia’s ability to grow, and we identify a superior alternative (citrate). Additionally, using experimentally infected blood, we show that Borrelia is highly concentrated in the platelet fraction, making it an ideal candidate for direct detection. These results lay the foundation for diagnostic test development, which could improve patient outcomes in Lyme disease.
Abstract
Serological diagnosis of Lyme disease suffers from considerable limitations. Yet, the technique cannot currently be replaced by direct detection methods, such as bacterial culture or molecular analysis, due to their inadequate sensitivity. The low bacterial burden in vasculature and lack of consensus around blood-based isolation of the causative pathogen, Borrelia burgdorferi, are central to this challenge. We therefore addressed methodological optimization of Borrelia recovery from blood, first by analyzing existing protocols, and then by using experimentally infected human blood to identify the processing conditions and fractions that increase Borrelia yield. In this proof-of-concept study, we now report two opportunities to improve recovery and detection of Borrelia from clinical samples. To enhance pathogen viability and cultivability during whole blood collection,
  • citrate anticoagulant is superior to more commonly used EDTA.
  • Despite the widespread reliance on serum and plasma as analytes, we found that the platelet fraction of blood concentrates Borrelia, providing an enriched resource for direct pathogen detection by microscopy, laboratory culture, Western blot, and PCR. The potential for platelets to serve as a reservoir for Borrelia and its diagnostic targets may transform direct clinical detection of this pathogen. View Full-Text

_____________________

For more:

The CDC deliberately avoids direct detection methods and has suppressed efforts for a direct test for decades.

Around 2003 the WHO encouraged research into microscopy as a direct test for the Borrelia spirochete, the pathogen causing Lyme disease. When a promising new and simple technique was discovered in 2013, it was however violently attacked. Not on the science itself, which is the normal procedure in science, but personally. Now retired professor microbiology Morten Laane was fired after he gave a lecture at a scientific conference in 2014. Moreover, his laboratory was closed down, the website of the scientific journal was hacked and the article disappeared. An exclusive interview (in link).

Lyme advocate and patient Carl Tuttle continues to ask WHY direct detection methods are not used for tick-borne illness.  The CDC continues to give him the run-around:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/27/letter-to-cdc-dr-beard-why-isnt-direct-detection-of-lyme-disease-a-priority/

Within this link you will learn of a current lawsuit over this issue by Sin Hang Lee, alleging that employees of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) unilaterally terminated a contractual agreement under which the CDC agreed to evaluate a “no false-positive” DNA based Lyme disease test, a currently available test that vastly improves the speed and accuracy of Lyme disease diagnosis for sufferers, and one that is capable of diagnosing all tick-borne borrelial infections.

The CDC’s stranglehold over Lyme testing is also evident with COVID-19 testing.  

I question whether an accurate test for COVID-19 is even possible. It appears it has NOT been singularly isolated and purified and without this important foundation, an accurate test AND vaccine will never be possible:

Category:

Lyme, research, Testing

Comments Off on Study Finds Two Ways to Improve Lyme Testing

Managing Risk of Ticks

https://www.lookingatlyme.ca/2020/10/managing-risk-in-the-outdoors-with-steve-smith/

S1 E15: Managing risk in the outdoors, with Steve Smith

EPISODES / BY
looking-at-lyme-s1-e15-v1.0
Listen to Podcast:  https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/7662b08f-4966-458a-bc65-0d9d7c7413de/15-lal-steve-smith.mp3

In this podcast, Sarah speaks with Steve Smith, an expert in outdoor risk management. Steve has worked for many years teaching, leading, planning, and consulting about ways to manage risk in the outdoors. Steve recently presented at the 2020 NOLS Wilderness Risk Management Conference.

Steve begins by explaining the difference between safety and risk management, and why this distinction is necessary when it comes to taking people into the wilderness. Every day we take risks and some degree of risk is not only unavoidable, it’s a necessary part of being human. Sarah and Steve discuss many of the benefits of how outdoor education and recreation translate to life skills, personal and social growth. Steve speaks about the history of Outward Bound and founder Kurt Hahn who taught about the importance of educating the whole student and encouraging them to explore beyond their comfort zones. It is an important component of developing and managing outdoor education programs, looking at the beneficial risks and identifying and mitigating the undesirable risks.

Sarah raises the topic of duty of care when taking care of young people in the outdoors. Steve points out that a robust risk management program is even more important when working with children. He points out that because Lyme disease is a very serious illness, accurate risk assessment and robust risk management strategies are needed. An important part of these strategies include having a plan in place to respond when events do happen.

Find out more about our forthcoming educator resource!

Steve sees risk management programs in terms of layers which start long before the adventure begins. He describes a risk management model introduced to thim by one of his mentors, Charles Reb Gregg, called “analyze – manage – inform”. This model involves analyzing hazards, managing them and informing people about potential hazards. He touches on the importance of informing participants in advance to avoid legal action. He describes some ways to analyze risk in relation to Lyme disease such as knowing the local tick activity. Managing the risk could include wearing bug repellant, avoiding tick habitats, and doing tick checks. Another important aspect of the strategy is knowing what to do if a participant finds an embedded tick, and knowing the symptoms of Lyme disease. Steve reiterates the importance of informing participants and/or parents about the risks involved.

It’s not about eliminating the risk altogether, it’s about managing that risk.
Steve Smith, Experiential Consulting, LLC

Steve explores some of the legal aspects involved when planning outdoor activities, and refers to a lawsuit relating to tick-borne encephalitis. He talks about the importance of hiring qualified staff, providing adequate and ongoing training, having written policies and procedures, and reporting and learning from incidents when they do occur. He emphasizes the value of reporting and analyzing “near misses” in order to learn from them and prevent similar incidents. Similarly, Steve finds that reflecting back on a trip with those who are running it is a great way to learn and make improvements for future programs.

Emphasizing the overwhelmingly positive aspects of outdoor education, Steve reminds us of how a solid risk management strategy (and corresponding policies and procedures) enable these programs to continue. He urges us to keep learning from our adventures and highly  recommends the NOLS Wilderness Risk Management Conference for those running outdoor programs. Thank you Steve for sharing and helping us manage risk in the outdoors!

______________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/04/12/tick-prevention-2019/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/07/18/frequent-prescribed-fires-can-reduce-risk-of-tick-borne-diseases/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/05/27/study-conforms-permethrin-causes-ticks-to-drop-off-clothing/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/05/31/fry-and-die/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/05/08/upstate-ny-disease-expert-prevention-really-works-do-it/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/11/nootkatone-registered-by-epa-insect-repellent-products-could-be-available-by-2022/

Category:

Lyme, Prevention, Ticks

Comments Off on Managing Risk of Ticks

What SAGE Has Got Wrong

**Note**

SAGE stands for Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies and is based in the UK. Similarly to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), it provides scientific and technical advice to support government decision makers during emergencies.

https://lockdownsceptics.org/what-sage-got-wrong/

What SAGE Has Got Wrong

16 October 2020. Updated 21 October 2020.

by Mike Yeadon

Chief Medical Officer, Professor Chris Whitty, and Chief Scientific Adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, give a Coronavirus Data Briefing in 10 Downing Street. Picture by Pippa Fowles/No 10 Downing Street.

“It’s Easier to Fool People Than It Is to Convince Them That They Have Been Fooled.” – Mark Twain

Dr Mike Yeadon has a degree in biochemistry and toxicology and a research-based PhD in respiratory pharmacology. He has spent over 30 years leading new medicines research in some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies, leaving Pfizer in 2011 as Vice President & Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory. That was the most senior research position in this field in Pfizer. Since leaving Pfizer, Dr Yeadon has founded his own biotech company, Ziarco, which was sold to the worlds biggest drug company, Novartis, in 2017.

Abstract

SAGE made – and continues to make – two fatal errors in its assessment of the SAR-CoV-2 pandemic, rendering its predictions wildly inaccurate, with disastrous results. These errors led SAGE to conclude that the pandemic is still in its early stages, with the vast majority (93%) of the UK population remaining susceptible to infection and that, in the absence of more action, a very high number of deaths will occur.

  • Error 1: Assuming that 100% of the population was susceptible to the virus and that no pre-existing immunity existed.
  • Error 2: The belief that the percentage of the population that has been infected can be determined by surveying what fraction of the population has antibodies.

Both of these points run entirely counter to known science regarding viruses and to a significant amount of evidence, as I will demonstrate. The more likely situation is that the susceptible population is now sufficiently depleted (now <40%, perhaps <30%) and the immune population sufficiently large that there will not be another large, national scale outbreak of COVID-19. Limited, regional outbreaks will be self-limiting and the pandemic is effectively over. This matches current evidence, with COVID-19 deaths remaining a fraction of what they were in spring, despite numerous questionable practices, all designed to artificially increase the number of apparent COVID-19 deaths. (See link for article)

_____________________

**Comment**

A few key quotes from Yeadon:

There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines.

SAGE has nothing useful to tell us. As currently constituted, they have an inappropriate over-weighting in modellers and are fatally deficient in pragmatic, empirical, evidence-led experienced scientists, especially the medical, immunological and expert generalist variety. It is my opinion that they should be disbanded immediately and reconstituted.

I believe the exact same thing could be said about the CDC

For more on CDC corruption:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/11/29/spider-attacks-cdc/  The corruption is vast and deep.  

Yeadon’s message is being repeated by thousands of qualified doctors who are being mercilessly censored by mainstream media which is completely bought out.

I posted this back in MARCH. Dr. Wodarg was right then and hasn’t changed his tune because it’s based on science:

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/17/stunning-insights-into-the-corona-panic-by-dr-wolfgang-wodarg/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/07/10/coronavirus-why-everyone-was-wrong/  Beda M Stadler is the former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, a biologist and professor emeritus. 

Excerpt:

  1. Firstly, it was wrong to claim that this virus was novel.
  2. Secondly, It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus.
  3. Thirdly, it was the crowning of stupidity to claim that someone could have Covid-19 without any symptoms at all or even to pass the disease along without showing any symptoms whatsoever.

Category:

Activism, Viruses

Comments Off on What SAGE Has Got Wrong