https://imahealth.substack.com/p/hospital-covid-protocols-the-grace?

Hospital COVID Protocols: The Grace Schara Case

IMA Co-Founders Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Joseph Varon are joined by Scott Schara and his attorney Warner Mendenhall to discuss medical advocacy, advance directives, and hospital accountability.

When Grace Schara died in a Wisconsin hospital during the COVID pandemic, her family began asking difficult questions about consent, protocol, and patient rights. This week, IMA Co-Founders Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Joseph Varon are joined by Grace’s father, Scott Schara, and his attorney, Warner Mendenhall of Freedom Counsel, to revisit the case and discuss the broader implications for medical advocacy, advance directives, and hospital accountability.

We’ll explore the concerns raised around medication protocols, Do Not Intubate orders, and access to records—alongside the lessons learned about legal barriers, family involvement, and the importance of independent medical advocates. The conversation is shaped by IMA’s longstanding commitment to restoring the doctor-patient relationship and building safeguards that empower patients and families.

Whether you’re entering the hospital yourself or bringing a loved one for care, the assumption is that medical staff will do everything possible to help. But the tragic story of 19-year-old Grace reveals just how wrong things can go when trust breaks down, protocols fail, and communication vanishes.

Grace Schara entered St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Wisconsin with low oxygen saturation during the COVID pandemic in October 2021. Her father, Scott Schara, believed she would simply receive oxygen therapy and come home safely. Instead, Grace passed away just days later under circumstances that sparked outrage and questions nationwide.

In the years following, Scott’s grief turned to advocacy, ultimately leading to Schara v. Ascension Health, the first COVID-era hospital negligence case in America to reach a jury trial. The landmark lawsuit, concluded on June 19, 2025, lasted three weeks and was passionately argued by a dedicated legal team led by Warner Mendenhall and Freedom Counsel.

Despite compelling expert testimony and a deeply sympathetic case, the jury ruled in favor of the hospital. Still, Scott and Warner remain undeterred. Their fight for justice continues—and so does the urgent conversation their case has sparked. In this powerful webinar, they reflect on what went wrong, what patients and families need to know, and how all of us, providers included, can help prevent tragedies like this from happening again.

Misunderstandings: “Do Not Intubate” (DNI) and “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR)

Regardless of the jury’s verdict, the case has opened the door to vital lessons every patient, family, and provider needs to understand.

IMA co-founders, doctors Joseph Varon and Paul Marik, both experienced critical care physicians at Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), weighed in addressing the shocking failures in Grace’s care. They highlighted systemic misunderstandings around crucial terms like “Do Not Intubate” (DNI) and “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR).

Dr. Marik explained:

“DNR means when a person is dead… not to resuscitate them. That’s what it means. It doesn’t mean do not treat, do not manage. It’s only when a patient is actually dead, heart has stopped beating and they’re clinically dead, that you do cardiopulmonary resuscitation… the DNI part complicates the issue.”

Dr. Varon emphasized the critical role of open, honest communication:

“I’m sure that if somebody told you ‘do not intubate’ means ‘do not resuscitate,’ you would have said ‘go ahead and intubate right now.’”

Under any circumstances, it’s unreasonable to expect patients and families to decode complex medical terminology in moments of crisis. But COVID has made one thing painfully clear: we must be prepared to ask questions, advocate for ourselves and our loved ones, and demand clarity.  (See link for article and video)

______________

For more:

The hospital COVID scam via The CARES Act:

Hospital protocols killed people:

The concerted strategy to ban effective COVID treatment, allowing the clot shots to be deployed:

CDC monopolizes fraudulent COVID testing:

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/interview-with-clayton-morris?

Interview with Clayton Morris

The DEADLINE for nations to REJECT the the amendments to the International Health Regulations is fast approaching n(July 19, 2025). NOW is the time to speak up, take action and spread the word.

For complete details, visit:

https://RejectTheAmendments.com

TO ALL WORLD LEADERS:

I strongly encourage you to formally exercise your authority under Article 61 of the International Health Regulations and IMMEDIATELY notify the World Health Organization that you have decided to REJECT the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations on behalf of the people of your nation.

July 19, 2025 is the deadline for heads of state of the 192 of the 196 nations that are parties to the International Health Regulation to reject the 2024 amendments.

Because 4 nations (The Islamic Republic of Iran, Netherlands, New Zealand and Slovakia) rejected the 2022 amendments to the IHR (which shortened the time period to reject future amendments from 18 to 10 months), the deadline for these 4 nations to reject the 2024 amendments is March 19, 2026.

Click on the following link for the top 10 reasons to reject the IHR Amendments Top_Ten_Reasons_To_Reject_The_Amendments_To_The_Ihr

A special note to President Donald J. Trump of the United States of America:

Dear President Trump,

On the very first day of your Presidency (January 20, 2025) you signed Executive Order 14155 which began the 1-year process of having the United States terminate its membership in the World Health Organization.

Sec. 4. Global System Negotiations. While withdrawal is in progress, the Secretary of State will cease negotiations on the WHO Pandemic Agreement and the amendments to the International Health Regulations, and actions taken to effectuate such agreement and amendments will have no binding force on the United States.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/withdrawing-the-united-states-from-the-worldhealth-organization/

HOWEVER, YOU HAVE NOT YET OFFICIALLY NOTIFIED THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION THAT YOU WISH TO REJECT THE 2024 AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS.

PLEASE TAKE OFFICIAL ACTION TO FORMALLY AND PUBLICLY REJECT THE 2024 AMENDMENTS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BEFORE THE JULY 19, 2025 DEADLINE AND ENCOURAGE OUR ALLIES TO JOIN YOU IN THIS ACTION.

Also, on February 4, 2025 you signed Executive Order #14199 which directed the State Department to conduct a review of “all conventions and treaties to which the United States is a party.”

(b) Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary, in consultation with the UN Ambassador, shall conduct a review of all international intergovernmental organizations of which the United States is a member and provides any type of funding or other support, and all conventions and treaties to which the United States is a party, to determine which organizations, conventions, and treaties are contrary to the interests of the United States and whether such organizations, conventions, or treaties can be reformed. Upon the conclusion of that review, the Secretary shall report the findings to the President, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, and provide recommendations as to whether the United States should withdraw from any such organizations, conventions, or treaties.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/withdrawing-the-united-states-from-and-ending-funding-to-certain-united-nations-organizations-and-reviewing-united-states-support-to-all-international-organizations/

The deadline for the above review is August 3, 2025 (180 days after February 4, 2025). Unfortunately the deadline to reject the 2024 amendments to the IHR (July 19, 2025) will pass before the State Department is obligated to deliver their report to you.

I humbly request that you direct the State Department to prioritize their review of the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations in order to prepare an official letter notifying the World Health Organization of your decision to REJECT the 2024 amendments AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, but definitely before the July 19, 2025 deadline.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

James Roguski

James.Roguski@gmail.com

310-619-3055

 

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/modified-mrna-slow-kill-bioweaponvaccines

by Mathilde Debord

Article Excerpts:

Is mass vaccination against COVID causing an explosion in cancer cases, as many scientists claim, some of whom had it prophesied from May 2021 ? A collective of French oncologists published two years ago a platform in which they categorically refute this hypothesis: ” To date, no alert link has been published between an increased incidence or risk of rapid progression of cancer after COVID-19 vaccination or after another vaccination.” Today they claim to be confronted with a tsunami of dazzling cancers, particularly among young people, to which they say they find no rational explanation:

We have a rapid increase in pancreatic cancer without us having the slightest idea of the reason. Something happened? We do not know. The whole world, all of world oncology is asking itself the question. […] The system that allows us to understand cancer is faulty.

Professor Khayat, co-founder of InCA

If Professor Khayat is consistent, he cannot theoretically exclude that vaccination could be at the origin of this explosion of cancer cases since it is (1) extremely recent if we refer to his previous interventions, (2) it affects the entire planet –in particular populations who have been forced to inject to maintain a social life or who have aggressively promoted vaccination (influencers in particular) –, and (3) it seems to respond to an unprecedented logic. As would a substance used for the first time in humans, of which only part of the composition is known and whose impact on cancer has not been assessed before its massive deployment[1].

Epidemiologist Nicolas Huscher listed last March 10 Ways Anti-COVID Messenger RNA Injections Can Cause Cancer. This list, resulting from a study[2] published in December 2023 in the journal Cureus can in our opinion be extended today to 17 items based (non-exhaustive) on more than 100 studies(See link for article)

________________

The 17 Ways are as follows:

  1. Genome instability
  2. Immune evasion
  3. Mechanism of repair of altered DNA
  4. Chronic inflammation
  5. Dysregulation of the immune system
  6. RNA disruption
  7. Activation of oncogenic pathways
  8. Tumor microenvironment
  9. Awakening of dormant cancers
  10. Impaired immune monitoring
  11. Frame offset (frameshift)
  12. Multiple injections
  13. DNA contamination of the Pfizer & Moderna shots
  14. DNA sequences of oncogenic SV40 in Pfizer shot
  15. Deregulation of the renin-angiotensin system
  16. Destruction of the microbiota
  17. Increased resistance to treatments

The articles gives the Joe Tippens Protocol for cancer.

For more:

‘Vaccine’ Exemptions

With Mary Holland

Date: July 22, 2025

Time:  8pm ET

Join us as we discuss vaccine exemptions and what you need to know about your legal rights as you navigate the educational school system, at all levels. For this UpClose, I will be joined by Kim Mack Rosenberg, General Counsel for Children’s Health Defense, and Kevin Barry, Esq., who has been advocating and supporting families as they navigate New York vaccine exemptions, which are among some of the most restrictive in the nation. 

As always, we will leave ample time for our experts to answer your questions. However, this month you will have the opportunity to submit questions prior to the event. A link to submit your questions will be provided after you register, with submissions accepted until Friday, July 18th. We hope this format will allow our experts to address more specific questions and concerns. Please note that not all submitted questions will be answered, and any information shared should not be considered legal advice but general guidance. 

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/support/about-chd-upclose3  Register Here

CHD hosts monthly UpClose virtual events and various UpClose InPerson events throughout the year for supporters who donate $10 or more within one year of the event date, or are current recurring donors.

For more:

https://ehtrust.org/hawaii-county-passes-law-keeping-cell-towers-away-from-homes-and-schools/?

Hawai’i County, commonly known as the Big Island, has passed an ordinance limiting how close cell towers may be constructed to homes and schools. The ordinance is the first of its kind in the island state, and Debra Greene, founder of Safe Tech Hawaii, said this “paves the way for other local jurisdictions in Hawaii to follow suit and implement similar ordinances.”

The legal team at EHT has been working with Big Island residents and Safe Tech Hawaii for months to help push this new regulation over the finish line. “The passage of Bill 24 is a notable victory because, to my knowledge, Hawai’i County, with a population of over 200,000, is the largest community in the U.S. with 600-foot installation setbacks,” said Environmental Health Trust legal fellow, Zoe Berg.

The unanimous passing of the bill on June 19, 2025 marks a clear victory for residents, many of whom don’t feel that more wireless coverage on the island is needed, and who have fought hard to keep new cell towers at a safe distance from homes and schools. It’s notable that Hawai’i County passed a resolution in 2020 calling for a halt to 5G deployments until independent testing can determine the safety of RF radiation emissions generated by such infrastructure. And earlier this year, Hawaiian Telcom unveiled an ambitious plan to make Hawaii the first fully fiber-enabled state by 2026, which would allow all Hawaiians to rely on fiber-optic cables rather than wireless networks for internet connectivity.

“The passage of Bill 24 in Hawai’i County acknowledges that buffers between powerful, wireless radiation-emitting technology and sensitive environments like homes and schools are important to protect public safety and public health,” Zoe Berg said. “We thank Debra Greene and all of the residents of Hawai’i County for their hard work in getting Bill 24 passed. We also thank the honorable members of the Hawai’i County Council for supporting more responsible, thoughtful wireless telecommunications infrastructure siting throughout the county.”

Both Verizon and AT&T submitted letters to the council expressing concerns about the setback requirement and requesting waivers, which ultimately were not granted. The final bill nonetheless represents a compromise; the process for telecom companies to get their towers permitted has been simplified, but those towers must be verified to survive winds of 100 mph or more, and in many of the county’s zones placed more than 600 feet from homes and schools (with exceptions for emergency communications facilities) and at a minimum distance of 120% of the height of the tower from all property lines. This is notably safer than the requirements on Oahu, where towers can be at a distance of only one fifth the tower’s height—putting private property at risk from falling towers.

With this new law, Hawai’i County joins dozens of communities across the United States which have passed ordinances regulating size and placement of cell towers with consideration to public safety, including cities and counties in New Hampshire, New York, California, and Massachusetts. Internationally, dozens of countries in the EU and beyond have implemented policies aimed at reducing children’s exposure to cell phones and wireless radiation.

If you would like to take action in your community to promote safer siting of cell towers, protecting vulnerable populations as well as property values, read Environmental Health Trust’s Action Steps on Cell Towers near Homes. This page includes links to scientific evidence, legal precedents, resources for organizing, and more to help win a local campaign for safer cell tower placement.

For more:

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/lyme-treatment-explained-co-infections

Lyme Treatment Explained: Co-infections and Complex Cases

IMA Senior Fellow Dr. Yusuf (JP) Saleeby hosts Part 3 in a series of Weekly Webinars on diagnosing and treating Lyme Disease.

Speakers: Dr. Yusuf (JP) Saleeby, Dr. Tom Moorcroft, Chris Jackman, FNP

Lyme disease is notoriously difficult to treat, but it’s even more complex than most realize. That’s because Lyme doesn’t always travel alone. Associated tick-borne co-infections like Bartonella and Babesia can mimic or mask Lyme symptoms, requiring different treatments to resolve. This reality turns Lyme treatment into a winding, uncertain road for patients and providers alike.

Luckily, we’ve enlisted some of the world’s top experts in Lyme and chronic disease to help demystify this debilitating condition. Join IMA Senior Fellow Dr. JP Saleeby as he hosts a practical conversation with Lyme specialist Dr. Tom Moorcroft and integrative nurse practitioner Chris Jackman. Together, they’ll break down what makes Lyme so persistent, how co-infections complicate recovery, and what successful treatment protocols can look like in the real world.

This is the third installment in IMA’s Lyme Disease series—an essential session for patients, practitioners, and anyone trying to make sense of this often-misunderstood chronic condition. Catch up with the previous episodes here:  (See link for article and video seminars)

More from IMA on Lyme:

Check out our ever-expanding Lyme Library for more:

_________________

For more:

One things for sure: a multi-drug combination is required for this.  Doctors who still prescribe ONE drug for this are hopelessly in the dark.  I would even add that ONE drug for an acute case isn’t enough and that tinidazole should be pulsed along with daily doxycycyline or minocycline until symptoms are completely gone.  I would also recommend blood ozone – the stronger the betterEBOO preferably.  If other coinfection symptoms arise – then the drugs that are effective for them should be layered in.  This is no joke, and the days of treating this passively are long gone.  Wake up doctors and do the right thing!