https://f.hubspotusercontent00.net/hubfs/6034706/GLA_whitePaper_PersisterBateriaAndLD_Vol2_F.pdf Paper Here

___________________

**Comment**

I have numerous problems with this paper – including the utilization of the PTLDS moniker and the faulty 10-20% that go on to suffer with persistent symptoms, as both are misleading and have dire consequences.

While they state persister bacteria have been documented after antibiotics in vitro, they state work in humans is inconclusive, when reality has shown a far different picture as well as the fact viable spirochetes have been found in these patients.

They state that much more work remains yet due to them downplaying the problem with faulty, low percentages – that work will never happen.  This tactic has been used for over 40 years.

It continues to amuse me that while they insist upon direct isolation of persisters in well-controlled animal experiments, the COVID-19 debacle continues to date without having this!  Once again this proves the double standard regarding Lyme/MSIDS.

And very sadly, they state that “clinical evidence does not support its efficacy” regarding prolonged treatment.  Your’s truly would not be writing this post today without this very maligned way of treating.  They also state that there is no sustained benefit in reducing chronic symptoms after initial treatment – yet here I am defying that very statement, and I’m far from alone.

Please understand, I’m not advocating a willy-nilly, indiscriminate treatment regimen.  Treating this is probably one of the most difficult things to treat.  For an example of what effective treatment looks like go here.

https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/06/you-are-a-pathetic-liar-cdc-senior-scientist-to-cdcs-head-of-immunization/

“You are a pathetic liar”: CDC senior scientist to CDC’s head of immunization (DOCUMENT)

A CDC internal email released through a Freedom of Information Act request reveals just how nasty things got behind closed doors after a CDC senior scientist confessed to covering up a link between vaccines and autism, and implicated his CDC colleagues.

The email, dated Sept. 2, 2018, was written by CDC’s Dr. Willam (Bill) Thompson to Dr. Frank DeStefano, CDC’s head of immunization safety.

In the email, Thompson responds to an interview DeStefano gave me in 2014. It was after Thompson stunned the scientific community by saying that he, DeStefano, and other CDC scientists committed fraud in a major vaccine-autism study. It was information that upended a decade-and-a-half of government and vaccine industry narratives on the controversy, and stood to impact some of the millions of families in the U.S. who have autistic children.

According to Thompson, he and his fellow CDC scientists covered up a link between MMR vaccine and autism in African-American boys.

“The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism,” Thompson later testified.

From: Vaxxed

CDC officials disposed of study documents “in a huge garbage can”

As part of the alleged fraud and coverup, Thompson said he and the other CDC scientists who conducted the research got together and literally trashed study data.

Thompson first revealed his role in the fraud during a series of phone conversations with the parent of an autistic child. The parent surreptitiously recorded the calls, in which Thompson confessed and said he lived with tremendous guilt. 

When the parent made the recordings public, Thompson admitted to scientific fraud and issued a statement issued through his attorney.

“I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information,” read the statement, in part. He also described how he says he and his CDC colleagues had a meeting and literally threw documents from the research into a garbage can.

The coauthors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four coauthors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can. However, because I assumed it was illegal and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hard copies of all documents in my office, and I retained all associated computer files.

Dr. William “Bill” Thompson, CDC Senior Scientist

CDC would not permit Thompson to do media interviews after he blew the whistle.

(See link for article)

________________________

**Comment**

This horrific crime was posted about here, has never been dealt with properly and U.S. attorneys actually withheld evidence in an autism-omnibus proceeding.

According to Thompson, head of CDC immunization safety Dr. Frank DeStefano made out they were friends when there was dissension within the ranks. The CDC also gave DeStefano the opportunity to be interviewed by CNN but not Thompson.  

At the same time, another of the government’s top pro-vaccine medical experts signed a sworn statement also alleging a government coverup of links between vaccines and autism.  He also states the government covered up his finding, fired him as an expert witness, misrepresented his opinion in court, and the DOJ secretly settled a major vaccine-autism court case that Zimmerman had consulted on, where the government admitted liability but made sure the records were sealed.  Out of the other side of their mouths they told parents of vaccine-injured children that links to autism were debunked conspiracy theories.

Congressman Bill Posey (R-Florida), Posey says he was unable to convince colleagues to investigate or schedule hearings on Thompson’s bombshell allegations, but after his claims began to gain traction, the ‘powers that be’ got busy smearing Thompson and anyone reporting his allegations.

The journal that published the study disregarded Thompson’s statements, and decided not to retract the study.

Please see original article for more information and links to sworn affidavits and allegations.  

For more on CDC corruption:

We continue to be told by our corrupt public health ‘authorities’ that vaccines are ‘safe and effective,’ despite our government paying out millions for vaccine adverse reactions & deaths.

Despite the rhetoric, it is quite clear that vaccines are not safe for some people.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/kajabi-storefronts-production/sites/53102/downloads/0Fl6sg7RNqmqBNZlUwsw_COVID_HIV.pdf  PDF here

Is HIV to AIDS what SARS-CoV-2 is to COVID?

by Torsten Engelbrecht, Kelly Brogan MD, Andrew Kaufman MD, Magdalene Taylor

“The idea that certain microbes – above all fungi, bacteria and viruses – are our great opponents in battle, causing certain diseases that must be fought with special chemical bombs, has buried itself deep into the collective conscience. But a dig through history reveals that the Western world has only been dominated by the medial dogma of ‘one disease, one cause, one miracle pill’ since the end of the 19th century with the emergence of the pharmaceutical industry. Prior to that, we had a very different mindset, and even today, there are still traces everywhere of this different consciousness.” – excerpt from the book “Virus Mania” by Engelbrecht et al.

We assert that the notion of the SARS-CoV-2 virus causing “COVID” is a recapitulation of the international infectious disease coup that took hold in the 1980s, namely, that HIV causes AIDS. The aim here is to present ourfindings to propose that AIDS was a dress rehearsal for the present entrapment of citizens worldwide using the dominant COVID narrative.

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/why-you-can-039-t-catch-a-virus_yaIkEBSS5wFSpw3.html  Video here

COVID-19 Virology Fraud Explained in 19 Minutes

______________________

**Comment**

I fully realize that the information presented here will rock your world if you are unfamiliar with our fraudulent public health ‘authorities’ who have controlled the narrative for decades, telling the public one thing, while the truth remains sequestered with experts who either remain silent out of fear or speak up and are vilified. These whistle-blowers are highly censored and maligned with ad hominem attacks. (Doctors who treat tick-borne illness appropriately are called “quacks” by their own colleagues who myopically follow the IDSA, despite evidence to the contrary.  They are also hunted down and persecuted).

Traveling the Lyme/MSIDS journey taught me a lot; however, the book “Virus Mania, How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics Making Million-Dollar Profits At Our Expense:  https://www.davidrasnick.com/aids/virus-mania.html, really opened my eyes to the virus fraud being foisted on an unsuspecting public.

Here’s a good explanation of the book.  Go here for an excellent article highlighting the issues.

One of the foundations of this fraud is the fact they have not singularly isolated/purified these so-called viruses and proven their infectivity on an animal model.  This ‘slight of hand’ is similar to the propaganda that these COVID injections are ‘safe and effective,” due to the fact millions are experiencing adverse reactions/death as well as the fact they omitted ‘absolute risk’ in their efficacy assessment.  When ‘absolute risk’ is taken into account these experimental, fast-tracked injections are less than 1% effective!  They also unblinded the trail (giving everyone the active vaccine) making it virtually impossible to estimate efficacy.

It is common in vaccine studies to NOT use an inert placebo but rather another vaccine as a comparison, as well as the fact they are utilizing faulty PCR testing in these efficacy studies.

Further, utilizing fraudulent testing is an old, old trick perpetrated by our corrupt public health ‘authorities.’ Many are unaware that there are thousands of scientists contesting the very premise of numerous viral ‘pandemics’ that weren’t.

Most are unaware of these tricks but these tricks are commonly used to obtain a pre-determined outcome.

I encourage you to start on the journey for truth.  This will take an open mind, patience, and a willingness to think for yourself always keeping in mind that “things are often not what they seem.”  Also, it’s important to always ask yourself what an expert or author stands to gain.  If the expert only stands to be ridiculed, vilified, threatened  and lose their job – they are either delusional, factually wrong, OR they should be considered and listened to.  Per usual, also: follow the money.

https://biocidin.zoom.us/webinar/register

14f4cb29-3626-4ca4-8db7-3c7bf41f8a08

Microsoft (Outlook)
Topic

Encouraging Resilience in the Immune System
Description

If immune health had been for sale in the U.S. last year, shelves would have been stripped. It was the hot topic for patients and practitioners.But what did we learn about strengthening immunity and building immune-system resilience?

• How did we expand our understanding of the science of the immune system?
• What did we learn about long-haulers?
• Did we achieve greater clarity about assessing immune- health status?
• And considering all factors influencing immunity, what can we say now about the role of botanicals?

We’re going to answer these questions (and more!) in a timely conversation.

Jocelyn Strand, ND, Biocidin’s Director of Clinical Research, and Ann Shippy, MD, will engage in a thorough discussion of what we’ve learned recently about immune health and the vital role botanicals can play for you and your patients.
Register now. You don’t want to miss this one!
Tim: Jul 23, 2021 11:00 AM in Pacific Time (US and Canada)

https://danielcameronmd.com/tick-bite-prevention-methods-failing-children/

PREVENTING TICK BITES ON A CHILD PROVES CHALLENGING

tick-bites-on-child

Children account for 25% of all Lyme disease cases in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Unfortunately, tick bite prevention methods are failing our children, as 5-to 9-year-olds continue to be at the highest risk for developing Lyme disease.

A study published in April 2021 looked at the frequency of emergency room visits due to tick bites. The authors examined “ED tick bite visits during January 2017-December 2019 by sex, age group, U.S. region, and seasonality,” writes Marx et al. [2] Their findings revealed that tick bites on a child under the age of 9 accounted for the highest number of ED tick bite visits.

During a 36-month period, there were 149,364 ED tick bite visits. The incidence was highest in the Northeast with the larger peak occurring during the spring and early summer, the authors write.

The findings support previous studies which explored the incidence of tick bites among various age groups and the associated risk of exposure to tick-borne diseases.

In 2016, more than 3,000 ticks (n=3551) were submitted to the University of Massachusetts Laboratory of Medical Zoology, as part of a passive surveillance study. The vast majority of ticks provided over a 7–year period were Ixodes scapularis ticks (or blacklegged ticks) from Massachusetts (N ≡ 2088). [3]

Tick bites on a young child pose dangers

Investigators found that children under age 9 had the largest proportion of tick bites. According to Xu and colleagues, 39.7% were identified as nymphs, while 34.6% were adult ticks.

Nearly 200 ticks were collected from children under age 5. Another 200 ticks were collected from children ages 5 to 9. Nearly 90 ticks were collected from adolescents.

Deer ticks were the most common ticks attached to a child. Out of the 3,551 tick bites, 89% were due to deer ticks.

Additionally, 98% of the 1700 adult ticks submitted were female.

The overall infection rate for Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasmosis phagocytophilum, and Babesia microti in human-biting ticks were 29.6%, 4.6%, and 1.8%, respectively, writes Xu. Tick bites on a child may lead to more than Lyme disease.

The authors reported ticks harboring multiple infectious agents:

  • 1.8% were co-infected by B. burgdorferi and A. phagocytophilum;
  • 1.0% were co-infected by B. burgdorferi and B. microti;
  • 0.4% were co-infected by A. phagocytophilum and B. microti.

Triple co-infections were found in 0.3% of the ticks.

Note: The investigators did not check for other infections, such as Bartonella henselae or Borrelia miyamotoi.

When do tick bites on children occur?

Tick bites on a child occurred most frequently in the Spring and Fall when children are participating in school activities and sports, explains Xu.

According to the authors, 1700 adult ticks displayed two discrete peaks:

  • April – June peak (representing questing activity of the overwintering population)
  • October – December peak (representing large autumnal populations)

Between April and October, 360 nymphs were received, with a clear peak in June.

How effective are tick bite prevention methods?

According to several studies, prevention methods are failing our children. One of the most effective ways of measuring whether tick bite prevention methods are working is to monitor the number of tick bites that involve an engorged tick. [4] This is because ticks typically do not become engorged for at least 24 hours.

READ MORE: The dangers in being bitten by a partially fed tick (not fully engorged), where infection is postulated to occur in less than 6 hours. Have you been bitten by a partially fed tick? 

Unfortunately, Xu and colleagues found that 35.6% of ticks attached to children younger than 9-years-old were engorged.

This is particularly concerning given that an engorged tick increases your chances of developing Lyme disease by 20 times. [5]

Only 12% of children reported performing regular tick checks.

A school-based intervention program, offered to 1,562 elementary students, explored why children are more likely to get a tick bite. [6] The responses indicate a need for ongoing educational efforts on tick bite prevention measures.

Following are the responses to several of the questions:

How often do you check yourself for ticks?

  • 56.8% = sometimes
  • 12.0%  = always
  • 25.8% = usually

Who helps you check for ticks most of the time?

  • 77.8% = grown-up at home
  • 14.6% = themselves
  • 2.0% = grown-up at school checked for ticks
  • 4.4% = did not check at all

“As long as there are no effective measures for controlling tick populations and there is no vaccine available, we rely solely on health education and communication efforts to prevent tick bites and Lyme Borreliosis (LB)” writes Beaujean. [7]

“We call on researchers and funders to prioritize research in the field of public health interventions for tick bites and LB,” he writes, “because, in the words of Benjamin Franklin, ‘an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.’”

UPDATED: June 21, 2021

References:
  1. Bacon RM, Kugeler KJ, Mead PS. Surveillance for Lyme disease–United States, 1992-2006. MMWR Surveill Summ, 57(10), 1-9 (2008).
  2. Marx GE, Spillane M, Beck A, Stein Z, Powell AK, Hinckley AF. Emergency Department Visits for Tick Bites – United States, January 2017-December 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Apr 30;70(17):612-616. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7017a2. PMID: 33914718; PMCID: PMC8084121.
  3. Xu G, Mather TN, Hollingsworth CS, Rich SM. Passive Surveillance of Ixodes scapularis (Say), Their Biting Activity, and Associated Pathogens in Massachusetts. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 16(8), 520-527 (2016).
  4. Falco RC, Fish D, Piesman J. Duration of tick bites in a Lyme disease-endemic area. Am J Epidemiol, 143(2), 187-192 (1996).
  5. Sood SK. Lyme disease in children. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 29(2), 281-294 (2015).
  6. Shadick NA, Zibit MJ, Nardone E, DeMaria A, Jr., Iannaccone CK, Cui J. A School-Based Intervention to Increase Lyme Disease Preventive Measures Among Elementary School-Aged Children. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 16(8), 507-515 (2016).
  7. Beaujean D, Crutzen R, Kengen C, van Steenbergen J, Ruwaard D. Increase in Ticks and Lyme Borreliosis, Yet Research into Its Prevention on the Wane. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 16(5), 349-351 (2016).

____________________

For more: