Don’t miss TONIGHT’s live video premiere of “What is Ivermectin?” Join us at 7pm ET on our YouTube channel to watch the short documentary explaining the medicine’s history and significance. FLCCC President and Co-Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Pierre Kory will introduce the film and then our very own, Betsy Ashton will conduct an interview with the filmmaker, Adrian Urso, after. As a bonus, viewers will be able to interact with our doctors, Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik in real time. Join here
First discovered in 1973, ivermectin won the Nobel Prize in 2015. What makes this drug so extraordinary? Watch the full story during our live premiere on Thursday, Dec. 9 at 7 p.m. ET on our YouTube channel: youtube.com/c/FLCCCAlliance
New Documentary on The PCR Test Deception is Banned on YouTube – Share this Film with Skeptics
by Brian Shilhavy Editor, Health Impact News
Film producer Rai Gbrym reached out to me last week about a new documentary he had just produced that exposes the fraud of the PCR test.
He had just posted it on YouTube and it already had thousands of views. I immediately downloaded the video so that I could view it when I had some time.
When I went to watch it, it was already banned on YouTube, and no longer available.
After viewing it now, I can see why Big Tech doesn’t want you to watch this, and why Google banned it on YouTube. If one can prove that the PCR Test used to detect COVID-19 is a fraud, then the entire “pandemic” is a fraud as well.
Rai does a very good job of exposing the fraud behind the PCR test, and he has excellent interviews with people like Dr. Stephan Lanka from Germany, and Dr. Malcolm Kendrick from the U.K.
We have featured the work of both these men over the years here at Health Impact News, as both of these men have been exposing the corruption in science and medicine for many years now, unlike the many doctors and scientists that have only recently begun to speak out against crimes in Big Pharma due to the COVID-19 scam.
Dr. Lanka made headlines in 2017 when he issued a challenge in Germany where he agreed to pay 100,000 euros to anyone who could prove that the measles “virus” actually existed.
Wanting to categorize him as a “quack” for not following the mainstream dogma, he had some people take him up on his challenge, but in the end, the German Federal Supreme Court confirmed that there was not enough evidence to prove the existence of the measles virus. See:
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick is the author of several books, including The Great Cholesterol Con,A Statin Nation: Damaging Millions in a Brave Post-health World, and Doctoring Data, among others.
Rai Gbrym has done a wonderful job in this documentary, and he is offering it to the public for free, even though it was self-funded, so important does he consider this information.
This completely bogus test has caused irreparable harm. It’s been used to falsely elevate cases and deaths, then used to make the COVID injections appear to be working (by lowering the cycle threshold). PCR has been used to make it appear that fully “vaccinated” people aren’t contracting or dying from COVID (called “break-through” cases) when many are, as well as to quarantine people, keep them from working, and causing unsubstantiated fear in the public. Meanwhile, the ‘powers that be’ are collecting massive amounts of genetic data, raising privacy concerns. The question is why? Perhaps to create the perfectly genetically engineered bioweapon that will cause massive death in the future?
Potential barriers to accepting a Lyme disease vaccine
Welcome to another Inside Lyme Podcast with your host Dr. Daniel Cameron. In this episode, Dr. Cameron discusses the potential barriers to the public’s acceptance and utilization of a Lyme disease vaccine.
It has been two decades since the LYMErix vaccine for Lyme disease was withdrawn from the market by the manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals after poor sales.
Why is it taking so long for another vaccine to become available? Several factors have been mentioned including: complex recommendations for the use of the vaccine; the lack of approval for the use of the vaccine in children, the group at highest risk; unvalidated claims of the vaccine causing Lyme arthritis and the coincident rise of general anti-vaccination sentiment among the public.”
CLICK HERE TO WATCH A VIDEO DISCUSSING POTENTIAL BARRIERS TO A LYME DISEASE VACCINE
The authors conducted 9 online focus groups which included consumers and 30 in-depth interviews among clinician groups.
The LYMErix vaccine was effective at preventing a rash but only 50% effective at preventing chronic manifestations of Lyme disease.
“Individuals who strongly disagreed with the importance of vaccines in general were excluded from the study to minimize skewed opinions that may not reflect the opinions of the general population,” the authors wrote.
They point out that their findings may not be generalizable. Nevertheless, the participants in the survey raised several potential barriers to accepting a Lyme disease vaccine.
Several of the clinicians’ concerns included:
“A quarter of the clinicians argued that a Lyme disease vaccine would be less important than other routine vaccines because Lyme disease can be prevented through other measures, cannot be transmitted person-to-person, is not widespread throughout the United States and has a lower disease burden than other vaccine-preventable diseases.”
“The most commonly presumed barriers to vaccine uptake were patient concerns about cost and safety and anti-vaccine sentiment.”
“Five clinicians expressed concern that a vaccine might promote a false sense of security against Lyme disease and other vector-borne diseases.”
The consumers also raised several potential barriers to accepting a Lyme disease vaccine. Below are a few of the consumers’ concerns:
“Four consumers expressed concerns about side effects, with most others assuming it would have minimal risks. Three consumers suggested that potential side effects may make a vaccine more risky than other preventive behaviors.”
“Four consumers shared that they prefer to avoid vaccines in general. Two consumers also mentioned generally that anti-vaccine sentiment in their communities might be a barrier for vaccine acceptance more broadly.”
“Two consumers mentioned that the vaccine could create a false sense of security among recipients if the vaccine was not completely protective against Lyme disease.”
One in three of the consumers were undecided about getting a Lyme disease vaccine for either themselves or a family member.
Survey Limitations
The participants were not asked to review the safety and efficacy of the LYMErix vaccine or a future vaccine. The LYMErix vaccine was effective at preventing a rash but only 50% effective at preventing chronic manifestations of Lyme disease, according to the LYMErix package insert.
It is not clear from the survey whether the clinician and consumer participants reviewed what they referred to as “unvalidated claims of the vaccine causing Lyme arthritis.” It is also unclear how to generalize their results, as the investigators excluded “Individuals who strongly disagreed with the importance of vaccines in general.” Finally, it is unclear whether the authors informed the participants that a Lyme disease vaccine would not protect a person from a co-infection.
The following questions are addressed in this Podcast episode:
1. What was the LYMErix vaccine based on?
2. What were the benefits and problems with the LYMErix vaccine?
3. What was your experience with the LYMErix vaccine?
4. Why would a Lyme disease vaccine be helpful?
5. What new vaccines have been introduced?
6. Do you agree with the participants concerns with a Lyme disease vaccine?
7. Is there a vaccine for co-infections?
8. How important would it have been to include participants who strongly disagreed with the importance of vaccines?
Thanks for listening to another Inside Lyme Podcast. Please remember that the advice given is general and not intended as specific advice to any particular patient. If you require specific advice, please seek that advice from an experienced professional.
Inside Lyme Podcast Series
This Inside Lyme case series will be discussed on my Facebook page and made available on podcast and YouTube. As always, it is your likes, comments, and shares that help spread the word about this series and our work. If you can, please leave a review on iTunes or wherever else you get your podcasts.
References:
Devchand R, Koehler L, Hook S, et al. Understanding consumer and clinician perceptions of a potential Lyme disease vaccine. Health Educ Res. Sep 16 2021;doi:10.1093/her/cyab032
__________________
**Comment**
The elephant in the room of course is WHY should we trust these people at all when they’ve never come clean over Lymerix or anything else in Lymeland including the faulty testing and Lyme “guidelines” which have ruled like an Iron Curtain. They’ve never admitted to persistent/chronic infection or that people were severely damaged from the first vaccine.
Interesting they left out those with anti-vaccine beliefs. Just erase people. Sure. Makes sense. Nothing to see here.
But that doesn’t stop those who care more about profits than people and more “vaccines” are in the works, but they haven’t dealt with the previous problems or come clean in any way, shape, or form:
Unfortunately, people still get infected. Some are infected congenitally, others aren’t fortunate enough to be diagnosed and treated early. And some researchers state you can become infected via other routes.
None of these “vaccines” deal with coinfections and most of us are infected with numerous pathogens.
Join Dr. Bill Rawls and special guest Jenny Buttaccio during this LIVE WEBINAR + Q&A on Tuesday, December 14th, at 8pm EST as they discuss who’s most at risk for mold-related illness, plus how to recognize the symptoms, test for, and get rid of mold in your home, food, and body.
Topics covered during the webinar will include:
Who’s affected by mold?
What are the symptoms of mold-related illness?
What are mycotoxins, and where are they found?
Are there any reliable tests for mold?
What are the best herbal and natural remedies for mold-related illness?
How can I protect my home from mold?
Numerous insights during the LIVE Q&A
Join us and bring your questions. Dr. Rawls and Jenny Buttaccio will answer as many as possible during the LIVE Q&A.