Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

Japan Ahead of the Curve: mRNA Blood Transfusion Risk

https://expose-news.com/2024/05/27/potential-deadly-risks-of-blood-transfusions/

Researchers Call for Urgent Action to Address Mass Contamination of Blood Supply

By Dr. Joseph Mercola

May 27, 2024

In a recent meta-analysis1,2 posted on preprints.org, Japanese researchers warn of potentially deadly risks to patients who receive blood from people who have taken mRNA covid injections and call for urgent action to ensure the safety of the global blood supply. According to the authors:3

… many countries around the world have reported that so-called genetic vaccines, such as those using modified mRNA encoding the spike protein and lipid nanoparticles as the drug delivery system, have resulted in post-vaccination thrombosis and subsequent cardiovascular damage, as well as a wide variety of diseases involving all organs and systems, including the nervous system …

[B]ased on these circumstances and the volume of evidence that has recently come to light, we call the attention of medical professionals to the various risks associated with blood transfusions using blood products derived from people who have suffered from long covid and from genetic vaccine recipients, including those who have received mRNA vaccines, and we make proposals regarding specific tests, testing methods, and regulations to deal with these risks.

Blood From Injected Donors May Pose Risk to Neurological Health

One particular risk addressed in this paper is the implications of blood tainted with prion-like structures found within the spike protein. Prions are misfolded proteins that can cause neurodegenerative diseases, such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (“CJD”) in humans, by inducing the misfolding of normal proteins in the brain.

Prion diseases are characterised by a long incubation period, followed by rapid progression and high mortality. The suggestion that the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, especially from certain variants, might contain prion-like domains raises concerns for several reasons:

  • Transmission risk – If spike proteins with prion-like structures can be transmitted through blood transfusions, there might be a risk of inducing prion diseases in recipients. Prion diseases are notoriously difficult to diagnose early, have no cure and are fatal, making any potential transmission through blood products a significant safety concern.
  • Detection and removal challenges – Current blood screening processes do not specifically test for prions, partly because prion diseases are rare and partly due to the technical challenges in detecting prions at low concentrations. If spike proteins with prion-like properties are present in the blood of covid injected people, existing blood safety protocols may not be adequate to prevent transmission.
  • Long-term safety concerns – Prion diseases have long latency periods, meaning that symptoms can appear years or even decades after exposure. This delay complicates efforts to trace the source of an infection back to a blood transfusion and assess the safety of blood supplies over time.
  • Impacts on blood supply management – Concerns about the potential risks associated with prion-like structures in spike proteins might lead to changes in donor eligibility criteria or the implementation of additional screening measures. These changes could impact the availability of blood products, which are critical for routine medical procedures.
  • Public confidence – Public awareness of these potential risks, even if they are theoretical or have a very low likelihood of occurring, could affect people’s willingness to donate or receive blood transfusions, thereby lowering blood donation rates and the overall trust in the safety of blood transfusions.

The authors stress the need for comprehensive studies to better understand the implications of these prion-like structures in the spike protein, not only for mRNA jab safety but also for the broader implications for public health measures like blood transfusion practices.

Other Potential Health Hazards of Contaminated Blood

Contaminated blood may also pose other serious health risks, including:

1. Reduced immune function among blood recipients – It’s been shown that the more doses of the covid “vaccine” you’ve received, the more likely you are to suffer future infections, either by SARS-CoV-2 or other viruses, due to antibody-dependent enhancement.

Blood donations from people who have received several doses of mRNA injections may not provide adequate immunity against common infections, resulting in subclinical infections and diseases in recipients.

2. Formation of blood clots and amyloid aggregates – If the immune system of a blood recipient isn’t strong enough to neutralise spike protein, blood clots and amyloid aggregates may also form.

3. Chronic inflammation – Prolonged exposure to the antigens from the covid-19 injections can trigger the generation of IgG4 antibodies, resulting in chronic inflammation and immune dysfunction.

IgG4 antibodies are often associated with chronic exposure to antigens, such as those seen in persistent infections, certain cancers, and prolonged exposure to allergens. IgG4 antibodies are also associated with a unique condition known as IgG4-Related Disease (IgG4-RD), a fibro-inflammatory condition characterised by swellings or masses in affected organs.4

Blood Transfusions and the Risk of Autoimmune Diseases

The authors also raise concerns about the potential of contaminated blood to cause autoimmune diseases in recipients. Recent research found that the RNA pseudouridylation, a process in which uracil is swapped out for synthetic methylpseudouridine, can cause frameshifting, basically a glitch in the decoding, which can trigger the production of off-target aberrant proteins.

The antibodies that develop as a result may, in turn, trigger off-target immune reactions. In addition to that, lipid nanoparticles (“LNPs”), a key component of the covid injections, have been identified as highly inflammatory and possessing more potent adjuvant activity compared to traditional vaccine adjuvants, which further increases the risk of an autoimmune response. As reported in the featured paper:5

Recent studies have shown that RNA pseudouridylation can result in frameshifting. It is not yet clear whether a portion of the pseudouridinated mRNA for the spike protein is translated into another protein of unknown function in vaccine recipients. If these proteins are also pathogenic, additional testing for such frameshift proteins may be needed in the future.

Even if a frameshift protein is not toxic, it must be foreign to the body and could cause autoimmune disease. In addition, LNPs themselves are highly inflammatory substances … LNPs have been found to have stronger adjuvant activity than the adjuvants used in conventional vaccines, and there is also concern about autoimmune diseases resulting from this aspect.

Thus, although it is not clear what the causative agent of autoimmune disease is, the large number of reported cases of autoimmune disease following genetic vaccination is extremely concerning.

The very mechanism of gene vaccines that causes one’s own cells to produce the antigens of pathogens carries the risk of inducing autoimmune diseases, which cannot be completely avoided even if mRNA pseudouridylation technology is used.

In this context, individuals with a positive blood test for spike protein may need to have interviews and additional tests for autoimmune disease indicators, such as antinuclear antibodies.

Alternatively, if the amino acid sequence of the protein resulting from the frameshift is predictable, these candidate proteins could be included in the initial mass spectrometry assay. In any case, it is particularly important to develop tests and establish medical care settings in anticipation of these situations.

Proposals for Managing Blood Collection

The authors outline several specific proposals for managing blood collection and blood products from individuals who have received genetic “vaccines.” Given the variety of blood-related abnormalities observed post-injection, the researchers argue that rigorous and precautionary measures in blood handling and transfusion practices have now become a necessity.

A key part of the proposal involves conducting thorough interviews with potential blood donors. These interviews should cover their vaccination status, number of doses received, their covid-19 infection history, and any symptoms they might be experiencing that could indicate conditions like post-vaccination syndrome (“PVS”), long covid or other complications.

The researchers also recommend deferral periods for blood collected from covid injection recipients – 48 hours for mRNA shots and six weeks for AstraZeneca DNA jab recipients. A series of tests are also proposed to ensure the safety of collected blood, including:

Mass spectrometry to measure spike protein content PCR for detecting the presence of spike protein mRNA and DNA
Testing for markers associated with autoimmune disorders Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Immunophenotyping Liquid biopsies combined with proteomics to detect and quantify spike protein and its mRNA

The authors also note that policies and procedures must be constantly revised as new risks and problems with blood products derived from mRNA and DNA injection recipients are identified.

Ensuring Safety of Current Blood Products

The paper also reviews strategies to ensure the safety of blood products already collected, highlighting the complex challenges that medical institutions, regulatory bodies, and the broader healthcare ecosystem must navigate in the wake of the widespread use of mRNA injections.

The primary concern is the risk posed to patients by the use of blood products from donors who have received gene-based injections without confirming the presence or absence of spike proteins or modified mRNA. To ensure their safety, methods to quantify potential contaminants must be developed and implemented as soon as possible.

Another critical issue that must be addressed is the current lack of reliable methods to remove spike proteins or modified mRNA from blood products. The authors warn that, given the potential persistence, low solubility, heat resistance and radiation resistance of these components, current methodologies are inadequate for the job. The only solution, they say, is to discard all blood products found to contain these contaminants until effective removal techniques are established.

Researchers Call for Widespread Blood Testing

Additionally, the researchers call for widespread testing of both injected and non-injected to assess the potential transmission of spike proteins through exosomes (so-called shedding).

As noted by the authors:

… when exosomes collected from vaccine recipients were administered to mice that had not been vaccinated with the genetic vaccine, the spike protein was transmitted.

Therefore, it cannot be denied that the spike protein and its modified genes can be transmitted through exosomes. For this reason, we suggest that full testing be done initially, regardless of genetic vaccination status, and that a cohort study be conducted to quickly capture the full picture …

In addition … it cannot be ruled out that even those who have not been vaccinated with the genetic vaccine, but have had long covid, may have residual spike proteins or fibrin-derived microthrombi in their bodies, so it would be advisable to conduct the same testing and follow-up as for genetic vaccine recipients.

The presence or absence and amount of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies as well as antibody isotypes may be an indicator(s) in distinguishing whether genetic vaccination or long covid is the cause. In any case, these cohort studies are expected to help establish cutoff values for blood levels of spike protein and other substances to determine the safety of blood products.

Faksova et al. conducted a large cohort study of 99 million people using a multinational Global Vaccine Data NetworkTM (GVDN®) and found a significantly increased risk of myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barre syndrome and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in genetic vaccine recipients.

Ensuring the traceability of blood products and establishing a rigorous legal and regulatory framework to manage the myriad issues arising from the use of blood products derived from covid-injected individuals are also paramount. This includes creating systems for the registration of all potential donors, ensuring the traceability of blood products and conducting recipient outcome studies.

Call to Pause: Evaluating the Risks and Benefits of Genetic Vaccines for a Safer Future

In conclusion, the authors point out that if we continue using mRNA-LPN-based platforms to replace conventional vaccines or create new ones, then the risks to our blood and bone marrow supply will be augmented further.

“The impact of these genetic vaccines on blood products and the actual damage caused by them are unknown at present,” they write.6

Therefore, in order to avoid these risks and prevent further expansion of blood contamination and complication of the situation, we strongly request that the vaccination campaign using genetic vaccines be suspended and that a harm-benefit assessment be carried out as early as possible, as called for by Fraiman et al.7 and Polykretis et al.8

T]he health injuries caused by genetic vaccination are already extremely serious, and it is high time that countries and relevant organisations take concrete steps together to identify the risks and to control and resolve them.

Sources and References

About the Author

Dr. Joseph Mercola is the founder and owner of Mercola.com, a Board-Certified Family Medicine Osteopathic Physician, a Fellow of the American College of Nutrition and a New York Times bestselling author.  He publishes multiple articles a day covering a wide range of topics on his website Mercola.com.

_______________

Japan Ahead of the Curve

Japan appears to be ahead of the curve not only in showing the seriousness of the mRNA injection issues, but politically as well.  Recently, Kazuhiro Haraguichi, former Japanese Minister for Internal Affairs has become the first major politician to apologize to the unvaccinated for the tsunami of deaths occurring among the ‘vaccinated.’  After getting two out of three COVID shots which were from ‘lethal’ batches, he developed a rapidly progressing form of cancer.  Three of his colleagues were also severely affected, but they haven’t spoken out.  He states those that do are censored.  He has urged people to stand united in challenging the government.

Thelibertybeacon.com reports: One of the key points in Haraguchi’s speech was his criticism of the ban on Ivermectin, a drug developed by Dr. Satoshi Omura, which he believed could have played a significant role in combating the pandemic. Haraguchi questioned the motives behind the ban, suggesting that economic interests were prioritized over public health.

Category:

Inflammation, research, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

WHO Adopts IHR Amendments

In this video, James Roguski explains that while the ‘Pandemic Treaty’ as such did not pass, Amendments to the IHR have been adopted and will be legally binding in 12 months unless countries refuse them. He also explains the more subtly devious root issue that those in the WHO are convinced that the only answers to ‘pandemics’ are testing, pharmaceutical drugs, and ‘vaccines.’  More clearly, the WHO has the misguided belief that a diagnostic test can determine if a person is a danger to another person.  The COVID shots have proven to be a catastrophe, as well as many of the drugs they used for COVID.

Just as deviously subtle, the IHR wording states that a communicable disease, in order to be considered a ‘pandemic’ is one that causes or is at risk of causing:

  • wide geographical spread
  • a capacity problem in health care systems
  • substantial social and or economic disruption – yet they blame the disease rather than the government’s response (lockdowns, firing unvaccinated people, etc).
  • whole of government or whole of society approaches

Another glaring problem is the amendments offer no concrete markers that offer actual proof such as hospital data or mortality to define in solid terms a true ‘pandemic’ vs a declaration.

In their definition of ‘equity,’ they want to transfer wealth (steal money from wealthier nations, funnel it through WHO to build out big pharma to have geographically distributed manufacturing of medical products such as gene therapies, vaccines and drugs, but not vitamins, clean water and nutritious food, etc.).  There is a blind and total acceptance of Big Pharma’s products despite the historical reality showing the damage and death they can cause.

Roguski also states that we already lost our sovereignty to Big Pharma which pays the FDA to approve their products that kill people. WHO simply brokered the deal called the International Health Regulation (IHR) amendments, so they can manage the insanity.

“This is a very skillfully crafted scam.” ~ James Roguski

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/the-amendments-to-the-ihr-have-been

The Amendments to the IHR have been adopted

The 77th World Health Assembly HAS adopted a substantial package of amendments to the International Health Regulations. We the People have suffered a stunning defeat. The battle continues.

JAMES ROGUSKI
JUN 01, 2024

The recently adopted amendments will facilitate an enormous global build up of the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex which seeks to trigger ongoing “pandemic emergencies” that will be made even worse by “relevant health products.”

Article 1

“relevant health products” means those health products needed to respond to public health emergencies of international concern, including pandemic emergencies, which may include medicines, vaccines, diagnostics, medical devices, vector control products, personal protective equipment, decontamination products, assistive products, antidotes, cell- and gene-based therapies, and other health technologies.

(See link for article)

Important excerpt:

For those who believe that the adoption of these amendments is somehow a “victory” for health freedom or that the amendments that were adopted “aren’t that bad” or that they “could have been worse,” or that we “dodged a number of bullets,” please realize that over the past year, quite a lot of misinformation has been spread regarding these amendments.

The build-up of the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex that these amendments seek to implement in support of the equitable distribution of “relevant medical products” is certainly NOT a “victory” that should be celebrated.

Stop allowing yourself to be deceived.

________________

**Comment**

This is why I didn’t celebrate too early.  I had a feeling something like this would go down.  

This is proof positive this organization needs to go.  Period.

#ExitTheWHO.com

#ExitTheWHO.org

For more:

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Birx Drops Truth While Pushing a Lie

In yet another example of rats jumping ship, former White House Coronavirus Coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx admits some obvious truths while couching them in lies.

It’s important to remember that Birx and former CDC director Robert Redfield, both Army medical officers, knowingly falsified scientific data published in the New England Journal of Medicine fraudulently claiming that an HIV vaccine they helped develop was effective. They knew the vaccine was worthless, and Redfield confessed that his analyses were faulty and deceptive, but instead of being held accountable, Congress appropriated $20 million to the military to support Redfield and Birx’s research project. Public Citizen complained in a 1994 letter that the money caused the Army to kill the investigation and “whitewash” Redfield’s crimes.

The fraud propelled Birx and Redfield into stellar careers as health officials.

Birx, a life-long protégé to both Redfield and Anthony Fauci, served on the board of Bill Gates’ Global Fund. Redfield, Birx and Fauci, who were interconnected for the HIV debacle, also conveniently led the White House coronavirus task force together.

Birds of a feather flock together.

https://rumble.com/v4uhmo6-dr.-deborah-birx-drops-massive-covid-vaccine-confession-while-still-pushing. Video Here (Approx. 8 Min)

Dr. Deborah Birx Drops Massive COVID ‘Vaccine’ Confession (While Still Pushing Lie)

“Scarf Lady” Dr. Deborah Birx Drops Massive Truth Bomb

First, Birx admitted that she “knew” the COVID shots “were not going to protect against infection.”

Whether she knew or not, millions taking them didn’t, and authorities sure didn’t tell them.

The shots weren’t even tested for reduction in hospitalization, death, or transmission, rather they were tested for reduction in severe symptoms – which is not the proper endpoint for “vaccine” efficacy. 

Now, she’s saying that thousands of Americans could be ‘vaccine’-injured.

The shocking confession came during an interview with former CNN anchor, COVID shot injured, and ivermectin user Chris Cuomo, who recently said, “Joe Rogan was right” about “horse dewormer,” which he once shamed people for taking.

But while Birx is revealing some truth, she’s still pushing a big lie. Watch her tiptoe between truth and fiction and listen to the HIV/AIDS mismanagement history as well as the lie that the COVID shots were ‘very effective for what they were supposed to be used for, which was prevent severe disease, and  hospitalization, and death.’

Covidians continue to attempt to rewrite history and pretend their views changed with ‘the science.’ Tyrants attempting to apologize or squirm out of accountability aren’t willing to truly go all the way with the truth because then they’d have to admit ALL vaccines can cause illness, adverse reactions, and death.

Despite the intended role of public health to protect the public, it is in bed with Big Pharma and the under the table deals the profits are simply too great to admit the truth. On one hand they are desperately trying to appease an ever growing populace that’s not only suffering from these drugs, but is catching on to their cover-ups and lies, while on the other hand it exterminates dissenters and anything deemed competition.

‘Mistakes were not made.  Don’t let them get away with it.’

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

History of Bioweapons, Lyme Disease, and the Question of Virology: Dr. Lee Merritt & Adam Finnegan

https://rumble.com/v4xob0r-dangerous-dames-ep.34-history-of-bio-weaponeering-w-adam-finnegan.html  Video Here (Approx. 1 Hour)

The Dangerous Dames Courtenay Turner & Dr Lee Merritt are joined by dangerous dude Adam Finnegan.

Adam is the author of “The Sleeper Agent”. He shares his personal medical journey that led him down the path of rigorous research and discovery. The conversation spans subjects of Lyme disease, history of bioweapons, the question of virology and what really makes us humans ill.

According to Finnegan, Lyme disease was not invented at the Plum Island lab in 1975, it was weaponized long before, around 1939 in Germany where Eric Traub conducted tests there with his weaponized strains. The actual spirochete, before it was weaponized, had been around for many years, and was a bird strain of Borrelia called Borrelia anserina,[2]  and had several developments, but may have been weaponized once more during Traub’s return to the United States after WWII and conducted tests with it on Plum Island.  

Regarding the findings in the five thousand year old mummy, scientists did NOT find Bb, or Ba, nor Bg – the three species of borrelia responsible for Lyme disease.   They simply found traces of what they thought might be borrelia species but said further testing is needed to confirm this.

Category:

Lyme, research, vaccines, Viruses

The Great FOIA Dodge & White House ‘Scientific Integrity Council’

The rats are jumping ship.  The latest is Dr. Lawrence Tabak, who took over for Francis Collins as principal Deputy Director of the NIH, and who admitted under oath that NIH was funding ‘gain of function’ research, despite Fauci’s repeated denials.

Then, Francis Collins finally admitted what Fauci also admitted: there is no evidence to support social distancing and the origin of COVID is not settled.

Stay tuned as the rats turn on each other and attempt to save themselves.

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-great-foia-dodge/

The Great FOIA Dodge

BY    MAY 28, 2024 

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests are meant to promote government transparency and accountability and give the public access to information about the operations and decisions of federal agencies.

But serious concerns have been raised about the ascertainment of public records and the lack of transparency of federal agencies.

In recent congressional hearings, it was revealed that top US public health officials created ‘secret’ back channels for communications on federal business in order to avoid prying eyes.

David Morens, a former top advisor to Anthony Fauci, allegedly destroyed public documents and boasted to colleagues that he would communicate with Fauci on personal Gmail accounts to circumvent FOIA requests.

“I can either send stuff to Tony [Fauci] on his private Gmail, or hand it to him,” wrote Morens in emails presented by the House Select Subcommittee.

“[Fauci] is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble,” added Morens, suggesting that Fauci himself was involved in dodging FOIAs.

In the subpoenaed emails, Morens wrote that someone in the FOIA office of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) gave him instructions on how to destroy public records, boasting that he could make emails vanish without a trace.

“I learned from our foia lady here how to make emails disappear,” wrote Morens in one email.

(See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

When Morens was questioned about why he was trying to hide emails and destroy federal records, he pulled a Fauci, developed selective amnesia, and simply couldn’t recollect. He also claimed ignorance that emails from his government account constituted federal records.

While HHS has suspended funding to EcoHealth Alliance and commenced formal debarment proceedings against Peter Daszak, Morens is still an employe of NIH, but has been placed on administrative leave.

There are many heads to the hydra in ‘gain of function’ research, government corruption, and FOIA dishonesty, and another head will simply pop up.  

So now, besides deliberately obfuscating and causing lengthy delays in processing FOIA requests, government actors are simply deleting inconvenient truths, or giving hundreds of pages that are redacted.

Evidence also uncovered by the subcommittee indicates that NIAID staff routinely misspelled keywords in order to avoid FOIA requests with specific keyword searches.

If this happened in the real world, people would go to jail, but if you are part of the government engine, you keep your job and simply develop better skills at hiding things and then teach others how to do it.  BTW: every person requesting a FOIA is charged a fee.

http://  Approx. 14 Min

Top Fauci Aid Caught Deleting Emails, Accused of Lying

4/23/24

Right to Know Reporter Emily Kopp weighs in on the latest scandal.

______________

And if it couldn’t get any more unbelievable……it does.

The White House is adopting 1984 ‘newspeak.’

https://www.dossier.today/p/biden-white-house-spins-up-scientific

Biden White House spins up ‘scientific integrity council’ to shield Government Health bureaucrats and DEI agenda

JORDAN SCHACHTEL
MAY 28, 2024

Article Excerpts:

Advertised as a council that upholds scientific rigor and truth before a political agenda, a draft policy document on the NIH website spells out the opposite, and provides information about exactly what the Biden Administration wants to achieve with this new group….

In government speak, these agenda items translate to promoting the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) agenda in “science” and continuing to grow the size and scope of the NIH.

The NIH is an essential component of the government bureaucracy because it acts in part as a massive slush fund grant maker to political and policy allies in the “health” space. Over the years, the NIH has continually weaponized the broad category of “medical research” to award conformity over innovation ingenuity. It hands out $40 billion a year in grants to its public and private partners in the United States.

(See link for article and the main institutions receiving this money, and to learn that ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ do not mean what you think they mean)

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses