Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

FOIA Reveal: FDA Official Privately Backed Ivermectin Trials – Then Publicly Mocked it As ‘Horse Medicine’

https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/top-fda-official-privately-backed

Top FDA official privately backed ivermectin trials—then publicly mocked it as ‘horse medicine’

Newly released FOIA documents reveal the agency’s dramatic U-turn.

Newly released emails obtained under Freedom of Information laws reveal that one of the FDA’s top officials privately supported testing ivermectin for Covid-19—while the agency later publicly dismissed it as “horse medicine.”

At the height of the pandemic in 2020, Dr. Janet Woodcock, then head of the FDA’s drug evaluation division, was appointed therapeutics lead for Operation Warp Speed to help fast-track Covid-19 vaccines and treatments.

At the time, ivermectin had shown significant antiviral potential in lab studies and was being used empirically in countries like Peru and Honduras. It was safe, cheap, already approved for treating parasites—and generating cautious hope as a potential Covid-19 treatment.  (See link for article)

______________

SUMMARY:

  • Woodcock was all in on ivermectin until she became acting commissioner for the FDA, then 7 months into her new role the infamous, ‘You are not a horse, You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it,’  FDA tweet came out, along with a special warning that “you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19.” The FDA’s statement included words and phrases such as “serious harm,” “hospitalized,” “dangerous,” “very dangerous,” “seizures,” “coma and even death” and “highly toxic.” Any reader would think the FDA was warning against poison pills. In fact, ivermectin is FDA-approved as a safe and effective antiparasitic.
  • This tweet suddenly created a culture war on ivermectin. The media piled on, doctors prescribing it were persecuted, and the AMA and other ‘professional’ medical groups banned it by making it impossible to prescribe or fill the prescription at pharmacies. Of course this had its intended affect: Doctors were suddenly afraid of prescribing a drug that a world famous toxicologist could not find a single case of an ivermectin overdose death from a drug which is on the WHO’s essential list of medicines.
  • This fear created the failure of a ‘get sicker’ policy despite ivermectin’s ability to fight 21 viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, the cause of Covid-19. A single dose reduced the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in cells by 99.8% in 24 hours and 99.98% in 48 hours, according to a June 2020 study published in the journal Antiviral Research.
  • The reason for the war?  Just two days after the tweet, the FDA granted approval to the Pfizer clot shot giving the Biden admin the foundation to enforce ‘vaccine’ mandates where people were forced to get the gene therapy shot or lose their jobs.

For a quick flashback of the tyranny, watch this video of a doctor being forcibly removed by police from a hospital board meeting simply for endorsing ivermectin that he used in his own private practice, and for evidently breaking protocol by whispering a “thanks” to a politician who questioned hospital policy. He shared at about 7:00 that doctors on staff at the hospital would come and see him to get ivermectin, but would not speak their mind or prescribe it for fear of retribution from hospitals or their own medical groups. He states that 99% of doctors now have a contract with the hospital and are beholden to it, and that ‘brutal’ COVID treatment protocols, which one nurse blamed for 90% of hospital deaths, were followed to the letter due to government financial incentives.  Hospitals were simply not interested in early treatment which have saved lives and freed up hospital beds.

There is a little good news:

  • In 2024, in an unprecedented court case, the US FDA led by Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, was forced to take down all of its false and misleading claims on ivermectin. The 3-judge panel ruled the law did not authorize the FDA to give medical advice.  (Remember this factoid for the future because the FDA has not admitted to any wrong doing and has not changed its position)
  • There are now 10 states filing bills to make ivermectin available over the counter.
  • The documentary ‘Epidemic of Fraud‘ exposes the orchestrated efforts to discredit this powerful repurposed medicine and uncovers the influential powers behind the attempted takedown.

Similarly to Lyme/MSIDS, you must go outside the system to obtain true help.  Clinics and hospital monopolies are all in bed with Big Pharma as well as the corrupt medical groups that castrate doctors who do not blindly stay in line and follow the accepted narrative.

Never forget what ‘the powers that be’ did by failing to treat COVID patients early with a safe, effective, cheap drug.

According to Dr. Peter McCullough, this suppression of treatment cost 500,000 lives.

How Spike Targets Blood Type A- Patients

https://justusrhope.substack.com/p/how-spike-targets-blood-type-a-patients?

How Spike Targets Blood Type A- Patients

AI Exposes Spike as a Witches’ Brew of Homologous Toxins

You may know that Spike Protein contains a Galectin-3 sequence or homology. We have written about how this sequence vastly increases risks for cancer and heart disease through biological mimicry.

However, Spike contains many other toxic sequences, many of which are not common knowledge, but should be.

Writing this story today shocked me. AI revealed protein sequences within the Spike that mimic snake venom, tetanus, botulism, measles, prions, and amyloid. This biological mimicry in Spike creates similar harmful biological responses in the person exposed to the Spike.

All of this is supported by peer-reviewed PubMed published studies.

Revising the Spike Protein Blocking Protocol

However, perhaps the most startling revelation is that those with Type A negative blood, which comprise some 7% of the US population, are at up to nearly double the risk of cancer. I discuss why and what one can do about this.

Accordingly, armed with this new information, the SpikeLoc™ Protocol is revised at the conclusion to include eight agents led by Ivermectin.

Why Spike Protein is so Deadly

For all my loyal Pre-Substack readers who have stuck with me since 2020 at a time I wrote mainly in the Desert Review, I dedicate this article. Spike Protein unfortunately appears to be a carefully engineered molecule.

Spike Protein contains various sequences that contain deadly similarities – known as homologies – to highly toxic agents. These similarities play out in the deadly consequences of Spike Protein manifesting the effects of the very agents it mimics.  (see article for important graphs & treatments)

______________

For more:

Truth About WHO Treaty – U.S. Must Opt Out of IHR by July 19, 2025

http://  Approx. 24 Min

WHO Pandemic Treaty

‘It’s Worse Than We Thought’

May 28, 2025

Members of Congress gave a letter to Biden in 2022 calling on him to exit the WHO, but only recently has Trump promised to withdraw from the corrupt organization.  Despite this, every country, including the U.S., is still on the hook unless they opt out of the WHO’s International Health Regulations (IHR) by July 19, 2025.

According to this, the agreement centers on something called the PABS system, a global plan to share profits from so-called “pandemic pathogens.”
“They literally talk about pathogens with pandemic potential,” Roguski said. “They don’t need to have an actual outbreak.”
Roguski warns their goal is to build permanent mRNA infrastructure, fast-track approvals, and hand out billions in contracts—before a single case is reported.
If the U.S. doesn’t opt out, the WHO has the power to sniff around for money to be used in this gigantic, global money laundering business deal to make Big Pharma even bigger.
It will allow the fraudulent PCR to be used in “One Health” – so inspectors will show up to test every animal using a test that virtually everything tests positive.
Not only does the U.S. need to opt out of ALL things WHO, the WHO needs to be eliminated.  It’s nothing but a money laundering business plan to use up tax dollars on things that don’t affect health one iota.

For more:

Study: Flu Shot Gives a 27% Higher Chance of Flu But FDA Unveils Universal Flu Shot

https://slaynews.com/news/cleveland-clinic-flu-vaccines-slash-life-expectancy/

Cleveland Clinic: Flu ‘Vaccines’ Slash Life Expectancy

A damning new study from the world-renowned Cleveland Clinic has confirmed that flu “vaccines” slash overall life expectancy by increasing the chance of being infected with influenza.

The study found that people who received the seasonal shots have a 26.9% higher chance of getting the flu compared to the unvaccinated.

The findings of the study were highlighted by esteemed British immunologist  Dr. John Campbell.

In a video shared on his YouTube channel, Dr. Campbell explains:

“A large study at the Cleveland Clinic found out that the flu ‘vaccine’ – the influenza ‘vaccine’ – over the last Winter, wasn’t that effective.

“In fact, it had a negative efficacy of 26.9%.

“In other words, if you took this flu vaccine, you were 26.9% more likely – more likely – to get influenza.

“Now, unfortunately, the paper doesn’t give us details on how much money the pharmaceutical industry made from selling this ‘vaccine’ with negative efficacy.”

Big Pharma makes $6.3 billion annually on this “vaccine.”
(See link for article)
__________________
 
**Comment**
  • A Pentagon study by Wolfe revealed that those vaccinated against the flu were “36% more likely to get coronavirus.
  • Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. warned in March that people who receive flu “vaccines” are “4.4 times more likely” to suffer a non-influenza infection.
  • Originally, the flu vaccine was a measure to protect the elderly, but go here for a blast from the past when four scientists researching the Flu vaccine during the 1960s found it to be ineffective and refused to give it to their own families.  The scientists state they were prevented from publishing their negative findings.
  • Now a recent Japanese study shows NO BENEFIT on hard outcomes: hospitalization and death. Another perfect example of how the massive push to vaccinate people for the flu has been a waste of time and effort.  Do not expect to read about this in the news.
  • The flu vaccine doesn’t prevent the spread of the flu.
  • CDC admits flu vaccine failed 91% of the time against the current flu strain.
  • Cochran’s 2018 review of 52 clinical studies on flu vaccines found only 15% of the studies were well designed and conducted and concluded that recommendations for routine use of influenza vaccine as a routine public health measure was not supported by the published evidence base.  
Yet, despite all evidence, DHHS is unveiling a ‘Universal Flu Vaccine.’

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2025/05/universal-flu-vaccine-unveiled-by-dhhs/

“Universal Flu Vaccine” Unveiled by DHHS

“Universal Flu Vaccine” Unveiled by DHHS

On May 1, 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) announced plans to develop a universal influenza vaccine that would eliminate the need for annual flu shots and offer protection against other pandemic influenza threats, including bird flu and respiratory disease caused by coronaviruses. The initiative, called “Generation Gold Standard,” will cost $500 million and reportedly combine “traditional vaccine technology” with modern tools. The “traditional” vaccine technology, called a beta-propiolactone (BPL)-inactivated, whole-virus platform, involves injecting people with a chemically altered version of the whole virus designed to make it harmless but still capable of stimulating the immune system.1 2 3

The announcement follows a recent study out of the Cleveland Clinic that found this year’s flu shot for the 2024-2025 flu season to be -26.9 percent effective and linked to an increased risk of influenza compared to unvaccinated individuals

“Generation Gold Standard is a paradigm shift,” said U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) director Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD. “It extends vaccine protection beyond strain-specific limits and prepares for flu viral threats—not just today’s, but tomorrow’s as well—using traditional vaccine technology brought into the 21st century.”1

The Generation Gold Standard initiative was made public the day after the DHHS announced that all newly developed vaccines will be required to undergo placebo-controlled clinical trials before receiving licensure. “Our commitment is clear: every innovation in vaccine development must be grounded in gold standard science and transparency, and subjected to the highest standards of safety and efficacy testing,” said DHHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.4

Some researchers questioned the decision to rely on what they consider an outdated and potentially inadequate approach. “This is a head-scratcher to me. This is puzzling,” Gregory Poland, MD, a vaccine expert from the Atria Academy of Science and Medicine in New York, told NPR. “We’re going back to technology that was used 40, 50 years ago or more. So this is a little surprising to me why you would go backwards to this technology? It’s a very old technology,” Poland says. “This is what influenza vaccines in the 40s, 50s and 60s looked like.”2

Dr. Poland suggested that newer technologies, such as the mRNA-based COVID shots, are safer and produce fewer side effects compared to whole inactivated virus vaccines, which he says typically produce high fevers and seizures and potentially scare patients away from getting vaccinated. “We have live attenuated nasal spray influenza vaccines. We have recombinant influenza vaccines. We have an mRNA-based influenza vaccine,” he says. “So why would you put all your eggs in one basket?”2

Researchers Warn of Underreported Injuries, Push for mRNA Vaccine Pause

While some experts criticize this approach as outdated, whole-virus vaccines, compared to mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) biologics technology, have been in use for decades and have well-documented safety profiles.5 Meanwhile, mRNA biologics have been at the center of ongoing controversy and public concern since mRNA COVID shots were approved for distribution by the FDA in December 2020.6

A 2024 study published in The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons suggests that COVID-19 shots should never have been classified as vaccines in the first place. “COVID-19 modRNA vaccines were misclassified as traditional vaccines rather than gene therapy products, bypassing stricter regulatory requirements; and WHO guidelines from 2005 were used for nonclinical assessments, despite being outdated and inapplicable to modRNA vaccines,” epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH said in a Substack post discussing the study findings.7 8  (See link for article)

______________

**Comment**

This ‘universal vaccine’ could enter clinical trials as early as next year and will be available to the public by 2029.  

For more:

WHO Pandemic Agreement Approved by Member States, Ushering in a Dangerous New World Health Order

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-who-pandemic-agreement-approved?

BREAKING — WHO Pandemic Agreement Approved by Member States, Ushering in a Dangerous New World Health Order

U.S. escapes WHO treaty enabling fast-tracked experimental vaccines, censorship of dissent, and global surveillance systems.

On May 19, 2025, the World Health Organization (WHO) took a historic but deeply concerning step: Member States, through Committee A of the World Health Assembly, officially approved the WHO Pandemic Agreement—a sweeping global treaty that is now expected to be formally adopted in plenary session on Tuesday, May 20.

This agreement, hailed by WHO leadership as a landmark tool for “equity,” “solidarity,” and “science-based” pandemic responses, contains alarming provisions that threaten national sovereignty, institutionalize emergency countermeasures, and entrench WHO as the central coordinating authority in future health crises.

Why It Matters That the United States Is Withdrawing from the WHO

On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order initiating the U.S. withdrawal from the WHO, citing its COVID-19 failures, lack of reforms, and disproportionate U.S. funding. The move paused all future U.S. funding, ended negotiations on the Pandemic Agreement, and recalled U.S. personnel. The withdrawal takes full effect on January 22, 2026.  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

According to Hulscher, the agreement is bad because:

  • National governments will be pressured to align their laws with global dictates
  • Experimental products would be rapidly deployed without sufficient safety data
  • Legitimate scientific dissent could be labeled as misinformation
  • Entire populations could be coerced into compliance with no guaranteed recourse for harm

One day after member states reached this deal, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made a surprise video appearance in full support of U.S. withdrawal from the WHO.

“Like many legacy institutions, the WHO has become mired in bureaucratic bloat, entrenched paradigms, conflicts of interest and international power politics. … The WHO often acts like it has forgotten that its members must remain accountable to their own citizens and not to transnational or corporate interests.” ~ Robert F. Kennedy Jr. HHS Secretary

Kennedy said the U.S. is open to international cooperation on public health, but not under the umbrella of the WHO.  He also said the U.S. is pivoting to make the healthcare system more responsive to the chronic disease epidemic.

Reuters reported that 124 countries voted for the agreement. No countries voted against while eleven countries, including Israel, Italy, Poland, Russia, Iran and Slovakia, abstained.

China, Qatar, Switzerland and others pledged over $170 million for the World Health Organization at its assembly on Tuesday, the agency said, and countries also accepted higher fees to help offset the expected loss of the U.S., the top donor.

“In a challenging climate for global health, these funds will help us to preserve and extend our life-saving work,” Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, said in a statement on new donations covering 2025-2028.

If COVID was the dress-rehearsal, I’d hate to see the actual performance of the WHO in any future ‘pandemic.’

For more: