Madison Area Lyme Support Group

Remember this?

Article Excerpts:

“Pfizer’s vaccine is more than 90% effective”.

Headlines repeated around the world and more importantly by the regulators FDA, TGA, EMA and MHRA.

Just to reiterate – this was about COVID infection. No claims on severity, hospitalisation or death were made by Pfizer.

Given that most of the vaccinated population actually “got COVID” – many of them multiple times, that sounds impossible, right?

That’s because it was.

Yet the trial itself showed 95% reduction in the risk of infection and was published in the infamous New England Journal of Medicine (the same journal that published the fraudulent Surgisphere study) on the 10th December 2020.

….we are going to show that the whole study was a sham and that there never was a benefit – at all, never mind “95% reduction in infection.”  (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

I’m eternally grateful that researchers and doctors are now onto the prolific research fraud that has been taking place.  Of course, this fraud has been going on in Lymeland for over 40 years, but now it’s on display for the entire world to see.  Yet another silver lining that came out of COVID mania.

• One of the main Pfizer hustles was mandating all PCR swabs for the trial be sent to their own lab in New York as part of the case definition.  Which means that Pfizer decided whether a swab was positive or negative – the only test that mattered.
• We only know this is due to a FOIA by attorney Aaron Siri.  Pfizer and the FDA tried to withhold this intel for 75 years.
• Another hustle concerns dates.  The cut off for the trial was Nov. 14, 2020.  The VRBPAC meeting was on Dec. 10, 2020, the same day the trial was published.  The VRBPAC assessment document for the Pfizer submission was written on Dec. 7, 2020, just two weeks after the submission – having to assess 44,000 participants.  The approval was made on the basis of 47 days of follow-up for most patients, but was also made in ONE DAY, because of the VRBPAC meeting on Dec. 20, 2020 – with EUA declared on Dec. 11, 2020.  Certainly a miracle.
• The dates demonstrate that all of this was impossible, which implies it was a pre-agreed approval based upon Pfizer showing data that there were less infections in the ‘vaccinated’ group based on a test they controlled – not on clinical symptoms.
• Evidently, Doran Fink of the FDA presented in the VRBPAC meeting despite having no clinical data and no experience in handling large data sets.  Unblinding in the trial was not allowed to happen until after Nov. 14, 2020, yet somehow Pfizer knew what was in which arm before that date.  Interestingly, Fink was then given a job at Moderna and now is at GSK, demonstrating clearly the revolving door between the FDA and Big Pharma.
• Even more miraculously Pfizer, the WEF, and mainstream media already knew by the 9th of November that the ‘vaccine’ had ‘worked’ despite the fact the data cut off was Nov. 14.
• Susan K Wollersheim’s ability to give the statistical presentation for VRBPAC on a 44,000 participant clinical trial is legendary as she has never published a clinical research study7.  
• There is no way Fink and Wollersheim did the analysis as they don’t have the skill set and they didn’t have the time necessary to do it.
• The good doctor who authored this article, Dr Ah Kahn Syed, states that it took him and a handful of people with the skillset required 3 years to sift through over 2 MILLION pages of FDA documents to just write this article.
• Moderna achieved a similar EUA approval only 7 days later due to a similar hustle.
• The third hustle: they stopped accumulating cases (in the “vaccinated group” only) for a specified time period in order to make the cut.
• A tactic they probably used, since they solely controlled testing, was to change the Cycle threshold on the machine recording the tests.  A Ct of over 40 will pick up a bunch of false positives and a low Ct of less than 16 will only pick up real cases with a high viral load.  They didn’t know the ‘sweet spot,’ so they had to change Ct as they went along.  The field that should have recorded the Ct on the machine is conveniently missing.
• Pfizer knew which tests were from the ‘vaccinated’ or the placebo group because they had the blood tests from every person in the study at their lab. Castruita showed in 2023 that even after 4 weeks there was enough circulating RNA (or DNA) from the COVID-19 vaccines to be able to perform genomic sequencing13.  While unlocking the database would create audit flags, they could easily identify who got what without raising audit flags, so they could then adjust the Ct up or down depending upon the number of positive tests they needed.
• The author proves that if you correct for the fact that, if you’re vaccinated, you have 2.3x less chance of showing N-antibody on a test, the infection rate of the ‘vaccinated’ and of the placebo group is identical.  There was no 95% reduction in infection in the ‘vaccinated’ group at all.  It was a scam.
• The author also shows from The FDA’s review that there were over 1100 more fevers and over 2000 more reports of chills in the ‘vaccinated’ group.

Sadly, all of this should have been done before ‘Operation Warp-speed,’ but let this be a solid reminder to not take ANYTHING until you are fully convinced it truly works and is safe.  In short, do not believe anything the medical machine for profit says.  Before you take anything they recommend, wait until independent research has been done.

There are probably many, many people who are now living with a lot of regret.