Madison Area Lyme Support Group

It seems every few years when the peak of the normal cycling of measles cases comes in, those who profit from vaccination and ad revenue from Pharma freak out and go on a rampage against people who decline the MMR vaccine for their children.

The Nirvana Fallacy of a world without measles due to 100% vaccination coverage has been disproven over and over with real-world data on outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations – and breakthrough infections in the vaccinated.

That’s vaccine failure, plain and simple. Let’s not forget about two former Merck employees, both virologists named Stephen A. Krahling and Joan A. Wlochowski.

From Jon Rapport:

“They’re insiders. They’ve leveled devastating charges against the company, which manufactures the MMR vaccine and sells it to the federal government.

In 2010, the whistleblowers filed a suit against Merck. The suit drags on in court (“UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al. v. MERCK & CO.,” Case No. 2:10-cv-04374-CDJ).

The Huffington Post reports on the charges in the suit (See: Merck Has Some Explaining To Do Over Its MMR Vaccine Claims, 9/24/2014, updated: 11/27/2014):

“…former Merck scientists [claim] that Merck ‘fraudulently misled the government and omitted, concealed, and adulterated material information regarding the efficacy of its mumps vaccine in violation of the FCA [False Claims Act].’”

“According to the whistleblowers’ court documents, Merck’s misconduct was far-ranging: It ‘failed to disclose that its mumps vaccine was not as effective as Merck represented, (ii) used improper testing techniques, (iii) manipulated testing methodology, (iv) abandoned undesirable test results, (v) falsified test data, (vi) failed to adequately investigate and report the diminished efficacy of its mumps vaccine, (vii) falsely verified that each manufacturing lot of mumps vaccine would be as effective as identified in the labeling, (viii) falsely certified the accuracy of applications filed with the FDA, (ix) falsely certified compliance with the terms of the CDC purchase [of the MMR vaccine] contract, (x) engaged in the fraud and concealment described herein for the purpose of illegally monopolizing the U.S. market for mumps vaccine, (xi) mislabeled, misbranded, and falsely certified its mumps vaccine, and (xii) engaged in the other acts described herein to conceal the diminished efficacy of the vaccine the government was purchasing.’”

“These fraudulent activities, say the whistleblowers, were designed to produce test results that would meet the FDA’s requirement that the mumps vaccine was 95 percent effective. To the whistleblowers’ delight, the judge dismissed Merck’s objections to the case proceeding, finding the whistleblowers had plausible grounds on all of the claims lodged against Merck.” The whistleblowers’ charges include detailed specifics on how Merck cheated, in order to produce the false conclusion that the mumps component of the MMR vaccine was 95% effective. For example, Merck placed rabbit antibodies into blood samples—pretending these were human antibodies signaling a high level of immune response to the vaccine.”

[From Two More MMR Vaccine Whistleblowers: They’re Suing]

Below is a letter sent by Cindy Bevington Olmstead (LinkedIn) to Margaret Wente at the Globe and Mail, Canada in July of 2013. Wente had published an article attempting to lay the blame for a local measles outbreak on people who choose to not have their children vaccinated with the measles, mumps & rubella (MMR) vaccine.

The problem with blaming so-called “Anti-vaxxers” is that as far as assessing causality goes, Science says it’s not AVers who are responsible. They just help provide evidence that the vaccine efficacy is waning. More on that in a moment. Here’s Cindy’s letter:

“Dear Ms. Wente,

As a journalist, you should do your homework Ms. Wente.

If you had done so, you would know that measles often occurs in fully vaccinated populations (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3821823), that the vaccine often does not work if the vaccinee has exposure to the sun or UVR rays around the time of vaccination (http://www.springerlink.com/content/v545057823230786/)*, that the active form of vitamin D (1,25(OH)2D3), derived from UVR-supported biosynthesis has well-documented immunomodulatory effects, and that there has been concern that increased exposure to UVR due to stratospheric ozone depletion could hamper the effectiveness of vaccines, particularly BCG, measles, and hepatitis (http://www.who.int/globalchange/publications/climatechangechap8.pdf).

You would also know that Harvard University researchers have found that because measles occur in highly vaccinated populations, VACCINATED PERSONS ARE A GREATER RISK TO THE UNVACCINATED than vice versa (See “AN EXPLOSIVE POINT-SOURCE MEASLES OUTBREAK IN A HIGHLY VACCINATED POPULATION: MODES OF TRANSMISSION AND RISK FACTORS FOR DISEASE https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-abstract/129/1/173/58793”) and that based on measles dynamics for industrialized countries, high birth rate regions should experience regular annual epidemics (See http://www.cidd.psu.edu/research/synopses/measles-outbreaks-niger/?searchterm=measles) because measles outbreaks come in waves just like pertussis.

If you bothered to go even a little further in your research, you would know that vaccine researchers have also found that EXPOSURE TO NATURAL MEASLES IS IMPORTANT in maintaining protective antibody levels among vaccinated children (http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/149/4/304.long) and that several studies have shown that measles or rubella-like illnesses in MMR vaccinated children are caused by other viruses.

Then again, most journalists these days don’t bother to do their homework so I can understand why you continue to perpetuate the vaccine sales propaganda, blaming non-vaccinated children on the measles outbreaks, along with the rest of the media, which has grown so lazy they don’t question anything that’s fed to them anymore. So sad that as intelligent as you are you haven’t bothered to look up the data for yourself.

[Globe & Mail article: Measles is back. It had help – The Globe and Mail (archive.org)]

Here are some additional fun facts about measles vaccine failure:

“Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences (R. J. McNall, unpublished data) – 37.6%”

Roy et al., 2017. Rapid Identification of Measles Virus Vaccine Genotype by Real-Time PCR J of Clinical Microbiol 55:735-743.

“Approximately 2% to 7% of children who receive only 1 dose of MMR vaccine fail to respond to it, i.e., they experience primary vaccine failure. MMR vaccine failure can occur because of passive antibodies in the vaccine recipient, immaturity of the immune system, damaged vaccine, or other reasons. “

CDC Pink Book. Measles.

In measles-endemic areas, breakthrough cases represent less than 10% of total infections, while in areas with high vaccination coverage, these are over 10% of the total. Two different vaccination failures have been described: primary vaccination failure, which consists in the complete absence of humoral response and occurs in around 5% of vaccinated individuals; and secondary vaccination failure is due to waning immunity or incomplete immunity and occurs in 2–10% of vaccinees.

Fappani C, Gori M, Canuti M, Terraneo M, Colzani D, Tanzi E, Amendola A, Bianchi S. Breakthrough Infections: A Challenge towards Measles Elimination? Microorganisms. 2022 Aug 4;10(8):1567. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10081567. PMID: 36013985; PMCID: PMC9413104.

“Two Vitamin A megadoses (200,000 international units (IUs) on each day for two days) lowered the number of deaths from measles in hospitalized children under the age of two years. Two doses of vitamin A are not considered to be too expensive and are not likely to produce adverse effects.”

Huiming Y, Chaomin W, Meng M. Vitamin A for treating measles in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD001479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001479.pub3. PMID: 16235283; PMCID: PMC7076287.

We’re going to see measles cases in increasing numbers as vaccine efficacy continues to wane. There’s nothing anyone can do about it. The community of individuals who bother to understand the dynamics involved will not tolerate the restriction of personal and civil liberties over the Nirvana Fallacy of measles eradication.

Twentyfive mainstream studies that demonstrate these products fail, have limited duration, prevent mothers from delivering antibodies to infants, and will in the long-term cause as many problems as they solve – compromising human resistance to measles without remotely eliminating it:

Bolotin et al. What is the evidence to support a correlate of protection for measles? A systematic review. J Infect Dis 2020;221:1576–83

Cherry, J. D., & Zahn, M. (2018). Clinical Characteristics of Measles in Previously Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Patients in California. Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 67(9), 1315–1319. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy286

Fiebelkorn, A. P., Coleman, L. A., Belongia, E. A., Freeman, S. K., York, D., Bi, D., … Beeler, J. (2016). Measles Virus Neutralizing Antibody Response, Cell-Mediated Immunity, and Immunoglobulin G Antibody Avidity Before and After Receipt of a Third Dose of Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccine in Young Adults. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 213(7), 1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiv555

Glass, K., & Grenfell, B. T. (2004). Waning immunity and subclinical measles infections in England. Vaccine, 22(29-30), 4110–4116. ​https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15364464/

Gibney, K. B., Attwood, L. O., Nicholson, S., Tran, T., Druce, J., Healy, J., … Cross, G. B. (2019). Emergence of attenuated measles illness among IgG positive/IgM negative measles cases, Victoria​, Australia 2008-2017. Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz363

Heffernan J.M., & Keeling M.J. (2009). Implications of vaccination and waning immunity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1664), 2071–2080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0057

Kang, H. J., Han, Y. W., Kim, S. J., Kim, Y.-J., Kim, A.-R., Kim, J. A., … Kim, S. S. (2017). An increasing, potentially measles-susceptible population over time after vaccination in Korea. Vaccine, 35(33), 4126–4132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.06.058

Kang, J. H., & Yoo, J.-H. (2019). The Measles Strikes Back. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 34(6), e59. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e59

Kontio, M., Jokinen, S., Paunio, M., Peltola, H., & Davidkin, I. (2012). Waning antibody levels and avidity: implications for MMR vaccine-induced protection. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 206(10), 1542–1548. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jis568

Leuridan, E., Hens, N., Hutse, V., Ieven, M., Aerts, M., & Van Damme, P. (2010). Early waning of maternal measles antibodies in era of measles elimination: longitudinal study. BMJ , 340, c1626. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1626

Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Deng, X., Hu, Y., Wang, Z., Lu, P., … Zhu, F.-C. (2018). Waning immunity of one-dose measles-mumps-rubella vaccine to mumps in children from kindergarten to early school age: a prospective study. Expert Review of Vaccines, 17(5), 445–452.​ ​https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2018.1445529

Markowitz LE, Albrecht P, Rhodes P, Demonteverde R, Swint E, Maes EF, Powell C, Patriarca PA., ‘Changing levels of measles antibody titers in women and children in the United States: impact on response to vaccination. Kaiser Permanente Measles Vaccine Trial Team.’, Pediatrics. 1996 Jan;97(1):53-8.

Melenotte C, Zandotti C, Gautret P, Parola P, Raoult D. Measles: is a new vaccine approach needed? Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18:1060–1.

Mossong, J., & Muller, C. P. (2003). Modelling measles re-emergence as a result of waning of immunity in vaccinated populations. Vaccine, 21(31), 4597–4603.

Mossong, J., Nokes, D. J., Edmunds, W. J., Cox, M. J., Ratnam, S., & Muller, C. P. (1999). Modeling the impact of subclinical measles transmission in vaccinated populations with waning immunity. American Journal of Epidemiology, 150(11), 1238–1249.

Nkowane, B. M., Bart, S. W., Orenstein, W. A., & Baltier, M. (1987). Measles outbreak in a vaccinated school population: epidemiology, chains of transmission and the role of vaccine failures. American Journal of Public Health, 77(4), 434–438. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.77.4.434

Orenstein, W. A., Strebel, P. M., Papania, M., Sutter, R. W., Bellini, W. J., & Cochi, S. L. (2000). Measles eradication: is it in our future? American Journal of Public Health, 90(10), 1521–1525. Retrieved from​ ​https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11029981

Pannuti, C. S., Morello, R. J., Moraes, J. C. de, Curti, S. P., Afonso, A. M. S., Camargo, M. C. C., & Souza, V. A. U. F. de. (2004a). Identification of primary and secondary measles vaccine failures by measurement of immunoglobulin G avidity in measles cases during the 1997 São Paulo epidemic. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 11(1), 119–122.

Paunio et al, ‘Secondary measles vaccine failures identified by measurement of IgG avidity: high occurrence among teenagers vaccinated at a young age’, Epidemiol Infect. 2000 Apr;124(2):263-71.

Stanley A Plotkin, ‘Is There a Correlate of Protection for Measles Vaccine?’, The Journal of Infectious Disease 1 November 2019

Poland, GA and RM. Jacobson, ‘The Re-Emergence of Measles in Developed Countries: Time to Develop the Next-Generation Measles Vaccines?’, Vaccine. 2012 Jan 5; 30(2): 103–104., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905323/

Rosen JB, Rota JS, Hickman CJ, Sowers SB, Mercader S, Rota PA, Bellini WJ, Huang AJ, Doll MK, Zucker JR, Zimmerman CM., ‘Outbreak of measles among persons with prior evidence of immunity, New York City, 2011’, Clin Infect Dis. 2014 May;58(9):1205-10. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu105. Epub 2014 Feb 27

Felicia Roy, Lillian Mendoza, Joanne Hiebert, Rebecca J. McNall, Bettina Bankamp, Sarah Connolly, Amy Lüdde, Nicole Friedrich, Annette Mankertz, Paul A. Rota, Alberto Severini , ‘Rapid Identification of Measles Virus Vaccine Genotype by Real-Time PCR’ https://jcm.asm.org/content/55/3/735″Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences (RJ McNall, unpublished data)”.

Waaijenborg S., Hahné S.J.M., Mollema L., Smits G.P., Berbers G.A.M., van der Klis F.R.M., de Melker H.E., and Wallinga J., ‘Waning of Maternal Antibodies Against Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella in Communities With Contrasting Vaccination Coverage’, J Infect Dis. 2013 Jul 1; 208(1): 10–16

Zhao et al, ‘Low titers of measles antibody in mothers whose infants suffered from measles before eligible age for measles vaccination’ Virol J. 2010; 7: 87., Published online 2010 May 6. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-7-87.

_________________

For more:

• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2022/12/20/article-rightly-predicts-next-battle-will-be-over-measles-vaccine-failure-but-will-be-blamed-on-anti-vaxxers/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/06/03/what-is-going-on-with-measles-the-science-politics-of-eradicating-measles/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/03/21/measles-propaganda-can-have-dire-public-health-ramifications/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/03/15/medical-doctor-of-50-years-current-measles-hysteria-not-based-on-science-but-scientism-a-quasi-religious-faith-in-vaccines/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/03/06/genetic-sequencing-science-breakthrough-just-proved-that-measles-outbreaks-are-caused-by-the-measles-vaccine/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/27/measles-transmitted-by-the-vaccinated-gov-researchers-confirm/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2023/05/26/doctors-can-make-a-nice-100k-or-more-a-year-to-push-vaccines/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2023/05/11/foia-reveals-incestuous-relationship-between-hhs-cdc-american-college-of-obstetricians-gynecologists/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/24/financial-kickbacks-for-vaccinations-abusive-illegal-fraudulent/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/02/11/industry-sponsored-doctors-new-study-shows-depth-of-commercial-influence/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/05/novartis-pays-678-million-settlement-for-giving-kickbacks-to-doctors/

By Francesca Havens, DPan

Graphene oxide, or reduced graphene oxide (GO/rGO) has been the topic of much research, much use and many controversies since it was invented less than two decades ago.

Most people had not, a few years ago, heard of any of the things that are now common parlance, like PEG, lipid nanoparticles and even less of GO. Yet now, men and women in their millions, some would say billions, go to sleep at night with the dark, electric angel of graphene cradling their dreams. How so you may ask, if this is yet new to you?

The most powerful controversies are happening right now in the midst of this paradigm-changing prolonged health crisis that some are calling the ever-giving gift: the pandemic. If we are to believe the evidence from the European Union’s €1 billion Graphene Flagship project, running now since 2013, and the industry go-to website graphene-info.com, GO is in absolutely everything! It is in anything from batteries to sanitary pads, from sensing ink for biomedical applications to nasal vaccines, from water filters to DNA sequencing, from tennis rackets to car parts and electronics. It can self-assemble in response to changes in temperature, and also with changes in ambient electromagnetic frequencies. Discovered in 2004, it is used in larger-scale assemblies all the way down to self-assembling nanotubes.

It is said to be 200 times stronger than steel, as well as being an excellent conductor of heat and electricity, very magnetic and with excellent light absorption qualities, which makes it understandably highly sought after in just about every industry.

THE OBVIOUS QUESTION: IS GRAPHENE SAFE?

Toxicology studies have accompanied the exponential growth of the industry, without fail pointing to the need for more research before it is used ubiquitously in every field and in forms that can evidentially penetrate to any part of the human body, including the brain.

Various academics and researchers have further indicated through RAMAN spectroscopy electron microscope techniques that graphene is present in the Covid-19 injectables, starting in 2021 with chemist Dr Pablo Campra of Almeria University, backed by many others (Zeee Media 2022, Austrian Pathologists 2021, Biscardi 2021, Botha 2021, Burkhardt 2021, Cipelli 2022, Delgado Martin 2022, Deruelle 2022, Exposé News 2023, Gazzeri 2022,  Giovannini 2022, Google Patents 2023, Hugues 2022, Iturriga 2021, Lee 2022, Madej 2021, Milhacea 2023, Monteverdi 2022, Nagase 2022, Nixon 2022, Noack 2021, Reissner 2021, Smith 2022, Van Welbergen 2022, Verkerk 2021, Wagh 2022, Wakeling 2022, Yanowitz 2022, Young 2021, Zalewski 2021).

Further to this, there is evidence that graphene is used in hydrogels (see nasal swabs above) and masks, so whichever way the human animal turns, there is a graphene trap.

GRAPHENE & THE INTERNET OF NANOTHINGS

There has been no public consultation that I know of towards the creation of human-machine interfaces, yet there is ample research that looks into just that:

“Bio-inspired molecular communications (MC), where molecules are used to transfer information, is the most promising technique to realise the Internet of Nano Things (IoNT), thanks to its inherent biocompatibility, energy-efficiency, and reliability in physiologically-relevant environments”.

The main difficulty with such nano communications seems to have been the electrically and magnetically conducive qualities of materials when used in biological systems, and graphene is the perfect solution. Note that in many studies they do not refer to the reality of living men, women and children or any other sentient being due to have technology implanted with or without consent: the language is always oblique and refers to ‘biocompatibility’ or ‘molecular communications’ or ‘physiologically-relevant’, yet we are clearly talking about human bodies. Other studies that focus with more clarity on certain biological functions like drug-delivery for cancer do acknowledge that it is the human body or its cells being targeted.

Naturally, there are many applications for these materials and nanotechnological systems that seem quite laudable, like applying them precisely to drug delivery to improve patient outcomes, or as scaffolding for tissues to enhance healing, nobody can argue with that. The doubt, however, that these rapidly developing technologies can be turned to darker purposes has been examined by numerous researchers, as above.

However, the decided lack of congruency and lack of science underpinning the synchronised transglobal governmental decisions right the way through the pandemic was so flagrant that those researchers and scientists that feared more for the wellbeing of humankind than for their own careers, income or reputations, turned to research to elucidate what could possibly have gone wrong.

Some were doctors who noted the crossover between their electrosensitive patients and those coming in with ‘Covid’ symptoms, where further research noted that the cases all came from an area where a mobile phone mast was erected. Further collaborative research revealed that elderly in 273 Spanish nursing homes curiously have mobile antennas directly outside their residences. Yet others refer to the magnetism shown by people, in thousands upon thousands of social media posts, on the area of their injection site or even on their chests, backs or foreheads. Of course the government, industry and think-tank sponsored ‘fact’ checkers all deny this phenomenon. Doth the industry protest too much? There are full conferences given over to the detection of graphene, and endless industrial suppliers of the same to be able to carry out these comparisons. There are even medical doctor-made documentaries claiming to show the phenomenon of undeclared MAC addresses coming from people, and even dead people (2021 onwards) in graveyards!

THE GRAPHENE ‘CORONA’

Information from Graphene Info explains that the human body treats graphene in the same manner it would a pathogen, calling on the rising suspicion that a graphene-radiation interface would be provoking what seemed to be a respiratory infection, as Dr Sevillano suspected on investigation into the geographical area his patients fell under (see above). This is during a time when the virus underlying the pandemic declared by the WHO remained unobtainable and undetected by any government, health department or institution questioned through freedom of information requests. Is it possible that graphene is magnified by the EMF emitted by mobile phone antennas? What about researchers who stated their research demonstrated no evidence of life or live matter in the coronavirus injectable vials? All graphene research in biotechnology is aimed at introducing it into the body one way or another, for multiple purposes, mostly obscure to ordinary people. However, I would not go from here to deride or underestimate the research done by esteemed virologists like Professor Montagnier, who alerted the public to the presence of HIV virus and other unusual viral sequences in the injectables. This is why I find it so confusing.

Once in the body, graphene attracts a web or crown of inflammatory proteins to deal with it and, in another remarkable coincidence, this bears an uncanny resemblance to the crown of the coronavirus so often depicted by the mainstream media and health authorities. The article linked further describes how “‘stealth’ NPs were developed by coating them with the hydrophilic polymer PEG” to dodge the immune system. The same article refers to the burgeoning number of research articles devoted to the phenomena of nanoparticle-provoked protein coronas and how to engage with them, in one way or another.

GRAPHENE & CHITOSAN, ANOTHER ELECTROMAGNETIC PROBLEM

As if the rest were not confusing enough, and has not created huge divides and inconsistencies even amongst scientists and commentators who are seemingly there for humanity and the Hippocratic oath, and not their wallets, there is yet another mind-boggling connection that is little investigated: the link between the functionality of graphene in all the applications mentioned, and further with chitosan, the carbon-rich insect exoskeleton extract. Again, this highly technical, combined nanomaterial is being hailed as a novel solution for health sciences. However, there are researchers that are questioning the potential uses in this field too, with extensive references.

Due to the number of incredible coincidences, onlookers are beginning to question the relationship between the triangle of injectible/intranasal modified nanoparticle drug delivery, the rapid expansion of the 5G network, and the insect diet being heavily promoted by supranational bodies down to primary schools (see “Insects on the menu” in this Substack). There is a little-elucidated query over the affinity between chitin and graphene, which some studies do suggest have natural affinity. Could it be that an insect-rich diet with non-disclosed graphene delivery from any of the potential fields of technology, including medicine, aviation fuel, and plant growth, would combine with the chitin automatically, enhancing the graphene within the body, thereby the potential as a sensor being used to gather or transmit information?

I consider the amount of research ordinary people have had to do in the last three years to keep abreast of developments and study hitherto-unknown areas of technology and medicine to be worthy of a Doctorate, indeed, why not DPan? Like the rest of my fellow pandemic graduates, I regard this collision and collusion of these different areas of technology, advancing at the speed of light with no consultation from ordinary men and women as to whether they choose this degree of complexity and intrusion into their bodies, families and lives, to be unconscionable. It calls for awareness, further research and consideration. Have you looked at the evidence, and what do you think?

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are Francesca’s own and do not necessarily represent the World Council for Health.