Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

FDA Refuses to Enforce EUA Ad Restriction. ‘Vaccine’Coercion, Lockdowns, & Mask Mandates Need to be Criminalized – Make Manufacturers Liable For Injuries Again

https://rumble.com/v4i1b5x-fda-refuses-to-enforce-eua-advertising-restriction-but-also-insists-it-must.html  Video Here (Approx. 2 Min)

FDA Refuses to Enforce EUA Advertising Restriction — But Also Insists it Must Keep the Provision!

During the pandemic, ICAN witnessed many instances where state and federal public health entities falsely referred to COVID-19 vaccines released under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) as “approved” or “safe and effective” in direct violation of federal law and the conditions of the vaccines’ EUAs. ICAN’s attorneys sent two petitions to the FDA demanding it either enforce the terms of its own EUAs that prohibit advertisements with this illegal language or rescind the advertising restrictions entirely. 

FDA chose to do neither.
Go here to see many other instances where ‘health’ agencies made unsupported claims to the public.

https://hillmd.substack.com/p/lawmakers-need-to-criminalize-vaccine?  Video Here  (Approx. 2 Min)

Criminalize vaccine coercion, lockdowns, and mandates of masks and shots now

Or you’ll be required to stay in your house, lose your livelihood, and take more possibly deadly shots in the next putative “emergency”
 
JAMES HILL, MD
MAR 5, 2024

The Covid bioweapon operation exposed vast lies by government and media about injections, masks, and lockdowns, injuring and killing millions and enriching a few overlords.

Action needed

Tell your congressperson and senator (who will probably ignore you) and your state legislators (who might pay attention) you insist they pass laws banning injection mandates. 

And while you’re at it, tell them no more mask mandates or lockdowns, either.

[Sample letter with references:  Letter to WI reps – Banning lockdowns, masks, shots copy]

If, unlike Covid jabs, future immunizations can confidently be shown to be safe, effective, and necessary in view of a significant threat, based on data and analysis that are fully transparent and verifiable by the public, then many will choose to take the shots.

But to coerce or require such shots must be made illegal.

This goes for schools and airlines too.

Impose mandates, go straight to prison. That must be the message.

Criminal law

Here is a sample draft statute for legislators:

Anyone who deprives a person of any right or privilege on the basis of whether that person has received, ingested, or had administered any medicine, therapy, medical procedure, prophylactic, vaccine, or immunization, or worn any mask or face covering, shall be guilty of a felony subject to imprisonment for not less than five years and a fine of up to $10,000.

Government officials or corporate executives found guilty under this section shall be subject to imprisonment for between 20 years and a life term.

(See link for article and videos)

______________

**Comment**

I highly recommend reviewing the words spoken in the videos in the above article where talking heads didn’t want the unvaccinated to sit next to them, to be able to buy food or to even to be able to receive needed medical help. This history must not be forgotten or downplayed or it will happen again. People should be ashamed of the heartlessly selfish words uttered.

SUMMARY: Just the facts

That would include this lot among many others:

It is 2024 and there is STILL no cure or proven ‘vaccine’ for respiratory disease.

Never again.

______________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chip-roy-liable-act-covid-vaccine-manufacturers

New Law Would Make COVID Vaccine Makers Liable for Injuries, Deaths

Children’s Health Defense is among the organizations that support a bill introduced Tuesday by Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) that would remove the liability shield for manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines and open the door for vaccine-injured Americans to sue companies like Pfizer and Moderna.

Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) on Tuesday introduced a bill that would allow Americans to sue the manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines for vaccine-related adverse events, including deaths by removing the vaccine makers’ liability shield.

The Let Injured Americans Be Legally Empowered Act, or the LIABLE Act, would “allow Americans who took vaccines that were misleadingly promoted and forced onto many Americans via federal mandates to pursue civil litigation for their injuries,” according to a summary of the bill publicized by Fox News.

“These vaccines were given emergency use authorization unilaterally and did not go through the normal FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] approval process,” the summary stated.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Motherload of Research Shows Graphene Oxide is Harmful but New Report Suddenly Says It is Safe

https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/graphene-oxide-nanoparticles-are

Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles are in COVID Vaccines; a new report says they are safe for humans….They are lying!

DR. PETER AND GINGER BREGGIN
MAR 4, 2024

SciTechDaily calls graphene oxide nanoparticles a “wonder material” that is now “verified safe” in humans by new research.1 It further declares graphene oxide is, in bold, “A revolutionary nanomaterial with huge potential to tackle multiple global challenges could be developed further without acute risk to human health, research suggests.”

Imagine that—graphene oxide nanoparticles are “without acute risk to human health.” That would suggest it’s harmless in vaccines, at least in the short run. The medical-industrial-military complex seems bent on proving graphene oxide nanoparticles are safe — perhaps  because critical researchers have discovered them hidden in COVID “vaccines.”2

The defenders of graphene oxide nanoparticles are handicapped in making safety claims because a motherload of research going back many years finds graphene oxide and nanoparticles in general are harmful to multiple body organs, to cells, and even to life itself across a spectrum of species.  (See link for article)

_______________

SUMMARY:

  • The new study dismisses the fact the blood of the volunteers who inhaled graphene nanoparticles consistently clotted when passed through arteries removed from people with pre-existing heart disease.
  • In the first respiratory study of its kind, it only involved 14 healthy volunteers. The fact the clotting problem was found in a statistically significant number should make the report even more alarming.
  • The study authors admit their nanoparticles are far more ‘clean’ or ‘pure’ than those in commercial use – which should cause even greater concern.
  • The authors ignore the vast literature on graphene harm to living things such as a 2016 review with 240 scientific citations which came to ominous conclusions about safety, pointing out toxicity concerns and oxidative stress.
  • Lung injury due to graphene has been studied in several studies but not in other organs.
  • No further humans studies and no commercial use should be allowed until further animal studies investigate this risk.
  • Concerning the COVID genetic injections – they should have been stopped within days of their release.  The fact the J&J shots were withdrawn because of 9 deaths due to thrombosis should be the precedent; however the mRNA shots continue to be promoted despite more than 36,000 reports of death to the VAERS reporting system as of Feb, 2024.
  • The government backed the Moderna and Pfizer deadly injections because they were picked as far back as 2010 by Bill Gates as his favorite “vaccine” investments. 

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Things They Didn’t Say At the ACIP Recap & CDC Releases 148 Pages on Myocarditis After COVID Shots – All Redacted

https://healthfreedominstitute.com/acip-feb-recap/

CDC’S ACIP RECAP: THINGS THEY DIDN’T SAY

March 6, 2024 – Last week the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) gathered for their regularly scheduled February meeting. The ACIP traditionally meets three times per year in February, June, and October. COVID upended that, with 10 meetings in 2020, 17 in 2021, 11 in 2022, and seven in 2023.1 The ACIP started this year with a notable eight vacancies on the panel, so for this meeting, members of the federal government stepped in as voting members. Topics included the expected: shots for COVID, flu, polio, pneumococcal, and meningococcal, alongside discussions revisiting guidance for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, and newly-licensed, fast-tracked chikungunya vaccines.

Four votes were taken; each passed easily. The first added another recommended 2023-2024 version of the COVID shot for those over 65. The committee spent over 30 minutes discussing whether the recommendation language would be more effective at getting shots in arms if the CDC says people “should” get the shot versus “may” get the shot. The difference is, if the CDC says people “may” get a shot, it sounds more like permission and would create discussion with providers about individual patient needs, while “should” more clearly supports their end goal of directing one-size-fits-all medicine. In the end, push came to shove and the crew decided “shared decision making” was too weak and confusing and went with “should.” Is it curious that the ACIP spent a hefty chunk of time debating the subtleties of persuasive language? Were there other topics that that went ignored?

The committee also voted to update Vaccines for Children (VFC) guidelines for combination vaccines containing tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis. This is significant because VFC earmarks taxpayer money to supply free vaccines to poor children only if the vaccine is specifically added to the list. But these combo shots have been given to children since the 1970s. What changed? The stated reason for doing this was because an unnamed maker of the only DT vaccine (who happens to be Sanofi), discontinued manufacturing.2 The DT vaccine was recommended for children who had a reaction to the pertussis component of DTaP, or people who showed up in the ER for potential tetanus exposure. DT will be replaced with Td, also manufactured by Sanofi, and containing less diphtheria toxoid than DT. (For a review of the alphabet soup of this combo shot, check out our article “Shining a light on Pertussis, the vaccine that opened the courthouse doors.”)

Strangely, the group voted to add Td, manufactured by MassBiologics, to the VFC resolution to authorize taxpayer dollars for free vaccines despite acknowledging the company’s very recent decision to discontinue manufacture of the product. There was no discussion about why either product was being discontinued, but Sanofi cited “minimal demand” in a letter to customers,3 and the maker of TdVax revealed the FDA was investigating some of its lots in 2022.4 One member of the committee, Dr. Chan, did not vote because he disclosed an active collaboration with MassBiologics. What does this curious vote mean for Americans? Moving forward, children who have a reaction to DTaP may be able to access Td (with lower doses of diphtheria toxin than DT) as long as there are no supply shortages, however, people going to the ER with a wound will most likely not be able to access a shot that does not include pertussis. Our article “Shining a light on tetanus: The case of the rusty nail and the anti-fertility vaccine” explains why doctors push the Dtap shot when they see open wounds.

Two further votes sailed through for the first-ever chikungunya vaccine to be recommended for lab workers and anyone traveling to a country where there is an increased risk of the mosquito-borne illness. Chikungunya commonly causes fever and joint pain and, according to the WHO, most people fully recover and have lifelong immunity.5 Serious or long-term illness occurs typically only in the very old or very young and those with complications. Unfortunately, the FDA’s press release announcing licensure in November 2023 makes one wonder if the cure is worse than the illness itself for the healthy traveler or lab worker:

The FDA’s announcement further explains that the vaccine was granted “Accelerated Approval,” based on whether a product may be effective. There’s no mention of safety requirements, and the press release admits that adverse reactions did not happen in the placebo group, and that it is unknown whether the vaccine will cause adverse effects in newborns. The FDA is relying on the manufacturer to do postmarket surveillance to gather safety data. In other words, we’ll figure out how safe this is after we sell it and see what happens.

There’s no information on the safety or efficacy for mom or baby, because it’s general practice not to test vaccines on pregnant women. There’s also no “human data” on whether vaccine virus or antibodies are present in breast milk after vaccination. Two pregnant women who were inadvertently included in clinical trials both had miscarriages after the vaccine was administered (none in the placebo group did), and the miscarriages were not attributed to the shot.

Regardless, the ACIP did not exclude or add precautions to their recommendation for pregnant women.

AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE WAS A LOT MISSING FROM THE MEETING DISCUSSION. HERE ARE JUST A FEW OF THE THINGS LEFT UNSAID DURING THE COVID DISCUSSIONS:

  • Data about hospitalization for COVID in children wasn’t given, though there was a full presentation on adult hospitalization.
  • Public attitudes about the shot, and top concerns were presented in the context of addressing why people haven’t gotten all the shots, and notably absent was any discussion of people’s concerns, which included serious or mild side effects, and whether the shot worked at all.
  • COVID vaccine safety presentations still did not address the safety signal from VAERS data and deaths.
  • Efficacy data presented did not include inquiry into “negative efficacy,” meaning questions of whether those vaccinated are more likely to get COVID.
  • Why efficacy data was discontinued after a very short 119 days.
  • Economic analysis also didn’t include the possibility of breakthrough infections in estimating years of life and money saved.
  • “Available data” addressing the acknowledged signal for stroke associated with the shot was “inconsistent,” with the claim “most” results didn’t show an association…which leaves one wondering if there are studies that have shown those results which were not disclosed or discussed.
  • There was no discussion about why they recommend a 2nd 2023-2024 shot for those over 65 at four months rather than the typical 2 month wait between shots.
  • There were references to differences in opinion among Working Group members regarding the 2nd shot recommendation, but full disclosure of those differences was absent.
  • There were comments about returning to strain recommendations at least yearly, but no discussion on why we need new strains every year.

HERE ARE SOME THINGS THEY DID SAY ABOUT THE COVID SHOTS:

  • “I totally acknowledge that lots of people don’t want it…anything we can do to lower the barrier of getting a vaccine in someone’s arm is just wonderful.”
  • “We know efficacy wanes.”
  • “98% of people have natural or vaccine immunity.”
  • [There are] “lots of questions, probably unanswerable.”

REFERENCES

  1. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/slides-archive.html ↩︎
  2. https://www.vaccineshoppe.com/medias/MAT-US-2203681-DT-Discontinuation-Customer-Letter.pdf?context=bWFzdGVyfHJvb3R8MTg4ODY4fGFwcGxpY2F0aW9uL3BkZnxhR1E1TDJnNU5DODVNVEV6TWpJeU9EY3pNVEU0TDAxQlZDMVZVeTB5TWpBek5qZ3hJRVJVSUVScGMyTnZiblJwYm5WaGRHbHZiaUJEZFhOMGIyMWxjaUJNWlhSMFpYSXVjR1JtfGE5Yzc4NGY3ZDdkYzEyNTdiMDE0M2YyMDMwZjIwY2I2YTY3MDUyNjk4M2U4ZDlhNWE4ODc2ZjcyZGVjNDNlMGM#:~:text=The%20decision%20to%20discontinue%20the,expiry%20date%20of%20April%202023. ↩︎
  3. https://www.vaccineshoppe.com/medias/MAT-US-2203681-DT-Discontinuation-Customer-Letter.pdf?context=bWFzdGVyfHJvb3R8MTg4ODY4fGFwcGxpY2F0aW9uL3BkZnxhR1E1TDJnNU5DODVNVEV6TWpJeU9EY3pNVEU0TDAxQlZDMVZVeTB5TWpBek5qZ3hJRVJVSUVScGMyTnZiblJwYm5WaGRHbHZiaUJEZFhOMGIyMWxjaUJNWlhSMFpYSXVjR1JtfGE5Yzc4NGY3ZDdkYzEyNTdiMDE0M2YyMDMwZjIwY2I2YTY3MDUyNjk4M2U4ZDlhNWE4ODc2ZjcyZGVjNDNlMGM ↩︎
  4. https://www.medline.com/media/assets/pdf/vendor-list/Medline-TdVax-Notification.pdf ↩︎
  5. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chikungunya ↩︎

_______________

**Comment**

What an absolute dog and pony show.  Do not trust these people.  At all.

The other little factoid not mentioned at the ACIP meeting was that they proclaimed all COVID gene therapy (40 in total) injections were 100% effective, but ZERO actually work.

In 2024, there is still no cure or proven “vaccine” for any respiratory disease.

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/follow-the-science-blindly?

“Follow the Science”… Blindly

The CDC “released” a 148 page study on myocarditis after COVID-19 “vaccination” and every single page is completely redacted

Does this remind you of the blank information inserts accompanying the Covid injections?

Here is a link to the released document – CDC MOVING FOIA – DocumentCloud

Though this is totally redacted, it shows us 3 things:

1. The CDC has TOTAL contempt for members of the public

2. Its blank BECAUSE the findings show that the vaccine causes myocarditis. If it didn’t cause myocarditis then they would not be hiding the results.

3. When they say “follow the science” they mean follow it blindly.

**UPDATE**

There is now an obvious concern about receiving a blood transfusion using COVID ‘vaccinated’ blood.  This article based on a Twitter post relays an important patient case of a COVID ‘vaxxed’ blood transfusion causing blood clotting and pericarditis.  Another unfortunate example of this is the death of a baby who died of blood clots after the hospital gave him a blood transfusion using “vaccinated” blood against the parents’ wishes. The hospital somehow managed to “lose” the specially donated unvaccinated blood by a family friend, so have an advocate with you if you are in the hospital.

Similarly to the redacted pages and blind refusal to admit the injections are even causing widespread blood and heart problems, researchers are carefully toeing the narrative by stooping so low as to compare the potential for life-altering health issues to a historical example of denying blood based upon race (the old race card).  There is quite a difference between the two when you consider the potential life-altering damage or even death from COVID ‘vaxxed’ blood. It’s simply easier to call it all ‘misinformation.’

You be the judge.
Go here to learn how to obtain mRNA ‘vaccine’-free blood.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

More CDC & Pharma Incest

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/new-cdc-advisers-vaccines-conflict-of-interest-pharma/

9 New ‘Independent’ Advisers to CDC Publicly Promoted Vaccines or Took Money From Pharma — or Both

After struggling for months to fill seats on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine advisory committee, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced nine new appointees. All have financial ties to vaccine makers or have publicly promoted COVID-19, RSV and HPV vaccines — or both.

3/6/24
SUMMARY OF ARTICLE:
  • HHS appointed new members to the ACIP – 9 of which have conflicts of interest
  • ACIP, which is supposed to be an independent, nonfederal expert body has nothing to do with health and everything to do with profit
  • The group includes 14 medical experts and a singular lay member to represent consumers as well as a non-voting body of eight ex officio members from other federal health departments & health-related organizations
  • The group recently lacked enough members to vote, requiring temporary government employees to fill in
  • The group  has also struggled to fill vacancies which will only increase in June
  • The article states that ‘stringent measures and rigorous screening,’ were used yet ALL of the new appointees have received grant funding or consulting fees from major pharmaceutical companies, including vaccine makers like Pfizer, Moderna and Merck, or have worked for HHS or on recent HHS grants developing or testing vaccines or investigating how to improve vaccine uptake.
  • Many were also key public advocates for the COVID, RSV, and HPV vaccines.
  • The article gives specifics on appointees and their conflicts, which is frankly depressing and clearly unethical.

Another perfect example that corrupt government agencies are beyond hope and rehabilitation, and quit caring about health decades ago, if they ever did.

Category:

Activism, vaccines

COVID Wasn’t An Accident – It Was A Crime

https://expose-news.com/2024/03/05/covid-wasnt-an-accident-it-was-a-crime/

Covid wasn’t an accident – it was a crime

BY RHODA WILSON ON 

If SARS-CoV2 was leaked from a laboratory, by accident, then why did totalitarianism spring up all around us?  Why did many countries almost simultaneously impose lockdowns, masking, censorship, political crackdowns, de-platforming and de-banking?

Why were hospitals forced to adopt harmful treatment plans while failing to provide early outpatient treatment? And why coerce populations to take untested gene therapy injections for which legal liability is waived?

There are too many indicators of premeditation and institutional fraud.  Covid wasn’t an accident – it was a crime. 

(See link for article)

_______________

**Comment** 

Wilson’s article also mentions Spartacus’ article which states lab accidents don’t do the following things: (I highly recommend reading the whole article as it’s all there in bright purple crayon):

Yep, premeditated crime.  Period.
Oh, and the CDC just downgraded COVID to the same severity as the flu.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses