Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Deception of ‘Vaccine’ Production: From Clinical Fraud to Bacterial DNA – Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-sucharit-bhakdi-the-deception?

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: The Deception of Vaccine Production: From Clinical Fraud to Bacterial DNA

“The success of clinical approval study is story in itself of large-scale fraud and deception…”

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi:

“The success of clinical approval study is story in itself of large-scale fraud and deception, you have already learned that today. This was the first prank, but the second followed immediately, the biggest scam of all time.”

“Remember, a few billion artificially created DNA recipes to vaccinate only 20,000 people was feasible in the genetic laboratory. But to vaccinate billions of people, no, that wasn’t possible. It was simply too much and far too expensive to make vaccines.”

“To do this, manufacturers had to go back to nature. The trick, the billions and trillions of countless DNA recipes are no longer put together under computer control and machines, they came from bacteria. So two ways to production. First way artificial, computer controlled. Second way, mass production by bacteria, mini chromosomes, plasmids.”

“These mini chromosomes, in this case this DNA is no longer human DNA, but that is now bacteria DNA, mind you. These mini chromosomes are easy to obtain and manipulate. Foreign recipes, for example the gene for corona spike protein or any other gene you want, can be inserted there.”

“The bacteria are then cultivated and simply automatically multiplied en masse through cultivation. The plasmids are the extracted and used as a template for producing the mRNA copies. Now we have them again, but they come from bacteria, this knock-off. This is different from the officially approved procedure.”

“Question from the interested audience. Has the use of bacterial chromosomes for vaccine production ever been reported, tested and approved for safety? The answer is in recently publishing by dr. Jürgen Kirchner, Elias, David Fischer and lawyer Brigitte Röhrig can be read. They have just been published.”

“Answer, no, they have never been tested, neither for content nor for security. The regulatory authorities, including PEI, EMA and FDA, simply waved them through and approved them. They, the authorities, were accomplices and accomplices.”

(See link for article and video)

______________

For more:

Pfizer Trial CFR Shows the Shots Make You 5x More Likely to Die From COVID

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-cfr-from-the-pfizer-trial-show?

The CFR from the Pfizer trial show the vaccines make you 5x more likely to die from COVID

It’s trivial to calculate the CFR if you got a Pfizer shot. But I don’t think anyone has before now. So I’m going to do it for the very first time.

Executive summary

The case fatality rate (CFR) from the Pfizer trial shows you are 10X more likely to die if you get COVID and you are vaccinated.

Pfizer just forgot to point this out.

Same with the CDC and FDA. I’m sure they just forgot.

So I’m going to show you that the CFR is 5X higher for Pfizer and when you combine that with a 40% higher likelihood of being infected (bringing it to 7.7X) we can now estimate that the COVID vaccine makes you over 5X more likely to die from COVID. And that’s not counting your risk of all-cause mortality from the vaccine itself!

The Pfizer Phase 3 study CFR calculation

Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months showed for COVID deaths/cases:

77 v 850 cases from Table 3.

Vaccinated: 1/77=.013
Unvaccinated: 2/850=.0023
Note: the deaths are in Table S4 in the Supplementary material

You were actually 5X more likely to die from COVID if you were vaccinated and you got COVID.

Survey data on risk of COVID infection (vaxxed v. unvaxxed)

We know from our own experiences that the vaccinated are more likely to get COVID.

From a recent survey I did, I found you were 40% more likely to get COVID if you got the shots. See vaxxed vs. unvaxxed survey.  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

So much for safe and effective.

The Risks of Vaccines During Pregnancy

https://autismwarriormom.substack.com/p/the-risks-of-vaccines-during-pregnancy?

The Risks of Vaccines During Pregnancy

What Expecting Mothers Need to Know

Pregnancy is a time of joy, anticipation, and careful decision-making. As an expecting mother, your primary goal is to ensure the health and safety of your baby. However, amidst the abundance of information and recommendations, it’s important to understand the potential risks associated with vaccines during pregnancy. Despite assurances from health authorities, recent evidence and expert testimonies suggest that vaccines given during pregnancy pose a significant risk to both mother and baby.

Lack of Proper Testing for Pregnant Women

One of the most concerning aspects of vaccine recommendations for pregnant women is the lack of rigorous safety testing. During a 2023 FDA meeting, Dr. Meryl Nass highlighted the troubling fact that many vaccines routinely recommended during pregnancy, including the COVID-19 vaccine, were not adequately tested in pregnant populations. The FDA admitted that its recommendations are based on limited or no data from controlled clinical trials involving pregnant women.

This absence of reliable data leaves many unanswered questions about the long-term effects of vaccines on both the developing fetus and the mother’s immune system. The decision to recommend vaccines without sufficient evidence undermines informed consent and raises serious ethical concerns.

Alarming Reports of Adverse Effects

Adverse events following vaccination during pregnancy are increasingly being reported. These include:

  • Miscarriages: Some studies and anecdotal reports have linked vaccines, particularly the COVID-19 vaccine, to an increase in pregnancy losses.
  • Preterm Births: Concerns have been raised about a potential connection between maternal vaccination and preterm deliveries.
  • Developmental Issues: Emerging evidence suggests the possibility of long-term developmental effects on the baby, though more research is urgently needed to confirm these findings.

Dr. James Thorp, a board-certified OB-GYN, has been vocal about the risks of vaccinating pregnant women, stating that the CDC’s recommendations lack robust scientific backing. Dr. Thorp and other experts argue that the precautionary principle should guide decisions regarding vaccines during pregnancy, especially when there are alternative ways to manage risks.

The Role of Adjuvants and Ingredients

Many vaccines contain adjuvants; these are substances added to enhance immune response. Aluminum-based adjuvants, for example, have raised concerns due to their neurotoxic effects. During pregnancy, the developing fetus is particularly vulnerable to toxins, and the accumulation of such substances may interfere with normal development.

The presence of viral DNA fragments and other contaminants in vaccines has also been flagged as a risk factor. These components are not fully studied in the context of pregnancy, further complicating the risk assessment.  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

Due to conflicts of interest, corrupt ‘public health’ agencies completely ignored natural immunity during the COVID debacle. Further, ‘vaccine’ safety and efficacy studies are a methodological mess, including the fact not a single childhood ‘vaccine’ was licensed based on a long-term placebo-controlled trial, that there is ZERO data on the accumulated effects of ‘vaccines,’ and the FDA relies upon the ‘vaccine’ manufacturer to do post-market surveillance to gather safety data.

There are a plethora of things you can do to make yourself a tough target for bacteria and viruses, and there are effective, safe, cheap treatments should you become ill.  ALL of which work better than ‘vaccines’ which are often ineffective, can give you the very disease they are supposed to prevent, are often contaminated, and are immune suppressing, which for Lyme/MSIDS patient can reactivate latent infections.

‘Vaccinating’ pregnant women should be a crime against humanity.

For more:

Part 2: Symptoms After Lyme Disease – What’s Past is Prologue

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/33160256?

Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue (Adriana Marques, M.D.) Part 2

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
Jan 12, 2025

As a follow-up to my previous update regarding my letter-to-the-editor of SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, the editor refuses to publish my eLetter.

Previous update:

Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue (Adriana Marques, M.D.)
https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/33044899

I have sent multiple inquiries to Editor Dr. Orla Smith with evidence of antibiotic resistance that has been suppressed/concealed by those who have colluded to deny chronic Lyme disease and here is just one of those letters for your review…

Photo of Marques was found on the following NIH site:
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/adriana-marques-md

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: Orla Smith <osmith@aaas.org>
Cc: Courtney Malo <cmalo@aaas.org>, “cope_assistant@publicationethics.org” <cope_assistant@publicationethics.org>, Melissa Norton <mnorton@aaas.org>, Catherine Charneski <ccharneski@aaas.org>, Brandon Berry <bberry@aaas.org>, Dorothy Hallberg <dhallberg@aaas.org>, Daniela Neuhofer <dneuhofer@aaas.org>, Molly Ogle <mogle@aaas.org>, “marybethpf@aol.com” <marybethpf@aol.com>, “aaron@sirillp.com” <aaron@sirillp.com>
Date: 01/12/2025 8:58 AM EST
Subject: Re: Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue

Dr Smith,

For additional evidence of antibiotic resistance, please see the following letter addressed to Dr. Raymond Dattwyler who owns 24 patents for Lyme disease that include diagnostic testing and vaccines both live bacteria and oral.

Guideline signatory Raymond Dattwyler endorses the categorical assertion that chronic Lyme disease does not exist yet his patent for novel chimeric nucleic acids and protein antigens which could serve as a basis for a vaccine or for improved immunodiagnostic reagents for Lyme disease, issuing almost contemporaneously with the 2006 IDSA Lyme Disease Guidelines seems to say exactly the opposite:

“Currently, Lyme Disease is treated with a range of antibiotics, e.g. tetracycline, penicillin and cephalosporins. However, such treatment is not always successful in clearing the infection. Treatment is often delayed due to improper diagnosis with the deleterious effect that the infection proceeds to a chronic condition, where treatment with antibiotics is often not useful. One of the factors contributing to delayed treatment is the lack of effective diagnostic tools.” (Dattwyler, et.al. United States Patent 7,179,448)

Letter to Dattwyler: (It should be noted there was no response)

Important Note!: My letter to Dattwylwyler includes a 1995 study from Stony Brook Lyme clinic. I understand the patient received thirteen spinal taps, multiple courses of IV and oral meds, and relapsed after each one, proven by CSF antigens and/or PCR. The only way this patient (said to be a physician) remained in remission was to keep her on open ended clarithromycin which she was taking for 22 months by the time of publication.

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “Raymond_Dattwyler@nymc.edu” <Raymond_Dattwyler@nymc.edu>
Cc: “npjvaccines@nature.com” <npjvaccines@nature.com>, “abarrett@utmb.edu” <abarrett@utmb.edu>, “R.W.Titball@exeter.ac.uk” <R.W.Titball@exeter.ac.uk>, “mgomesso@uthsc.edu” <mgomesso@uthsc.edu>
Date: 01/06/2023 2:46 PM EST
Subject: The year that shaped the outcome of the OspA vaccine for human Lyme disease

npj Vaccines Jan 2022

The year that shaped the outcome of the OspA vaccine for human Lyme disease
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-022-00429-5
Raymond J. Dattwyler & Maria Gomes-Solecki

Department of Microbiology and Immunology

New York Medical College

Valhalla, NY

Raymond J. Dattwyler, Corresponding Author

Dear Dr. Dattwyler,

I read your manuscript with great interest as you call attention to a treatment-resistant Lyme arthritis with “no evidence of DNA” found in the joints of patients after antibiotic treatment.

For some strange reason however, I could not find the following 1995 publication within your paper identifying treatment-resistant neuroborreliosis:

European Neurology 1995

Seronegative Chronic Relapsing Neuroborreliosis
https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/117104

Lawrence C., Lipton R.B., Lowy F.D., Coyle P.K.d

Abstract

We report an unusual patient with evidence of Borrelia burgdorferi infection who experienced repeated neurologic relapses despite aggressive antibiotic therapy. Each course of therapy was associated with a Jarisch-Herxheimer-like reaction. Although the patient never had detectable free antibodies to B. burgdorferi in serum or spinal fluid, the CSF was positive on multiple occasions for complexed anti-B. burgdorferi antibodies, B. burgdorferi nucleic acids and free antigen.

In fact, Dr. Dattwyler there seems to be a great deal of “treatment-resistant” evidence published in multiple journals over the past three decades:

Peer Reviewed Evidence of Persistence of Lyme Disease Spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi and Tick-Borne Diseases (700 References)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/n09sk90eo6xz7ua/700%20articles%20LYME%20EvidenceofPersistence-V2.pdf?dl=0

So that brings me to the reason for this email…

Question:

Does a chronic relapsing seronegative disease fit the vaccine model? If not, would that, in and of itself, be the hidden reason for denying chronic (treatment-resistant) Lyme disease for almost three decades?  In other words, patent royalties and pharmaceutical profits over lifesaving care?

A response to this inquiry is requested.

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH

Cc: Alan D.T. Barrett, PhD Editor-in-Chief

Rick Titball, PhD, DSc, Deputy Editor

Letter to the Editor of the BMJ published June 2020
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1041/rr-1

_______________

**Comment**

BOOM!  Another mic drop from Tuttle.

Seriously, the lunacy is breath-taking.

First Reported U.S. H5N1 Death, COVID Shot Brain Damage & Hundreds of Operational Biolabs

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/first-reported-us-h5n1-bird-flu-death?

First Reported U.S. H5N1 Bird Flu Death, COVID-19 ‘Vaccine’ Brain Damage, and Hundreds of Operational Biolabs

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher on Brannon Howse Live

Please enjoy my interview on Worldview Tube with Brannon Howse, where we discuss breaking public health developments:

  1. The first H5N1 bird flu death ever reported in the United States: The Louisiana Department of Health should release more details — This patient was over 65 years old with multiple underlying health conditions. It’s entirely possible that these pre-existing conditions were the primary cause of death, rather than H5N1 itself. A few weeks ago, Labcorp launched an H5N1 bird flu PCR test in the U.S., now available for order through physicians. As a result, we can expect the Biopharmaceutical Complex to soon use falsely inflated PCR ‘case counts’ and the first reported death as tools to increase public fear of bird flu, driving higher demand for bird flu vaccinations.

  2. Catastrophic Neurological and Psychiatric Damage from COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’Increased risks of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack, myelitis, myasthenia gravis, Alzheimer’s disease, cognitive impairment, depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders.

  3. Biolabs: We need a clean sweep of the hundreds of operational BSL3/BSL4 biolabs that possess modified pathogens with pandemic potential, most of which are located in dense population centers. Since 2001, there have been ~300 confirmed biolab pathogen leaks globally, with the vast majority (78.6%) occurring in the United States. State-sponsored bio-terrorism must be SHUT DOWN to prevent another man-made pandemic.

_______________

For More: