Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

The Risks of Vaccines During Pregnancy

https://autismwarriormom.substack.com/p/the-risks-of-vaccines-during-pregnancy?

The Risks of Vaccines During Pregnancy

What Expecting Mothers Need to Know

Pregnancy is a time of joy, anticipation, and careful decision-making. As an expecting mother, your primary goal is to ensure the health and safety of your baby. However, amidst the abundance of information and recommendations, it’s important to understand the potential risks associated with vaccines during pregnancy. Despite assurances from health authorities, recent evidence and expert testimonies suggest that vaccines given during pregnancy pose a significant risk to both mother and baby.

Lack of Proper Testing for Pregnant Women

One of the most concerning aspects of vaccine recommendations for pregnant women is the lack of rigorous safety testing. During a 2023 FDA meeting, Dr. Meryl Nass highlighted the troubling fact that many vaccines routinely recommended during pregnancy, including the COVID-19 vaccine, were not adequately tested in pregnant populations. The FDA admitted that its recommendations are based on limited or no data from controlled clinical trials involving pregnant women.

This absence of reliable data leaves many unanswered questions about the long-term effects of vaccines on both the developing fetus and the mother’s immune system. The decision to recommend vaccines without sufficient evidence undermines informed consent and raises serious ethical concerns.

Alarming Reports of Adverse Effects

Adverse events following vaccination during pregnancy are increasingly being reported. These include:

  • Miscarriages: Some studies and anecdotal reports have linked vaccines, particularly the COVID-19 vaccine, to an increase in pregnancy losses.
  • Preterm Births: Concerns have been raised about a potential connection between maternal vaccination and preterm deliveries.
  • Developmental Issues: Emerging evidence suggests the possibility of long-term developmental effects on the baby, though more research is urgently needed to confirm these findings.

Dr. James Thorp, a board-certified OB-GYN, has been vocal about the risks of vaccinating pregnant women, stating that the CDC’s recommendations lack robust scientific backing. Dr. Thorp and other experts argue that the precautionary principle should guide decisions regarding vaccines during pregnancy, especially when there are alternative ways to manage risks.

The Role of Adjuvants and Ingredients

Many vaccines contain adjuvants; these are substances added to enhance immune response. Aluminum-based adjuvants, for example, have raised concerns due to their neurotoxic effects. During pregnancy, the developing fetus is particularly vulnerable to toxins, and the accumulation of such substances may interfere with normal development.

The presence of viral DNA fragments and other contaminants in vaccines has also been flagged as a risk factor. These components are not fully studied in the context of pregnancy, further complicating the risk assessment.  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

Due to conflicts of interest, corrupt ‘public health’ agencies completely ignored natural immunity during the COVID debacle. Further, ‘vaccine’ safety and efficacy studies are a methodological mess, including the fact not a single childhood ‘vaccine’ was licensed based on a long-term placebo-controlled trial, that there is ZERO data on the accumulated effects of ‘vaccines,’ and the FDA relies upon the ‘vaccine’ manufacturer to do post-market surveillance to gather safety data.

There are a plethora of things you can do to make yourself a tough target for bacteria and viruses, and there are effective, safe, cheap treatments should you become ill.  ALL of which work better than ‘vaccines’ which are often ineffective, can give you the very disease they are supposed to prevent, are often contaminated, and are immune suppressing, which for Lyme/MSIDS patient can reactivate latent infections.

‘Vaccinating’ pregnant women should be a crime against humanity.

For more:

Part 2: Symptoms After Lyme Disease – What’s Past is Prologue

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/33160256?

Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue (Adriana Marques, M.D.) Part 2

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
Jan 12, 2025

As a follow-up to my previous update regarding my letter-to-the-editor of SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, the editor refuses to publish my eLetter.

Previous update:

Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue (Adriana Marques, M.D.)
https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/33044899

I have sent multiple inquiries to Editor Dr. Orla Smith with evidence of antibiotic resistance that has been suppressed/concealed by those who have colluded to deny chronic Lyme disease and here is just one of those letters for your review…

Photo of Marques was found on the following NIH site:
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/adriana-marques-md

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: Orla Smith <osmith@aaas.org>
Cc: Courtney Malo <cmalo@aaas.org>, “cope_assistant@publicationethics.org” <cope_assistant@publicationethics.org>, Melissa Norton <mnorton@aaas.org>, Catherine Charneski <ccharneski@aaas.org>, Brandon Berry <bberry@aaas.org>, Dorothy Hallberg <dhallberg@aaas.org>, Daniela Neuhofer <dneuhofer@aaas.org>, Molly Ogle <mogle@aaas.org>, “marybethpf@aol.com” <marybethpf@aol.com>, “aaron@sirillp.com” <aaron@sirillp.com>
Date: 01/12/2025 8:58 AM EST
Subject: Re: Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue

Dr Smith,

For additional evidence of antibiotic resistance, please see the following letter addressed to Dr. Raymond Dattwyler who owns 24 patents for Lyme disease that include diagnostic testing and vaccines both live bacteria and oral.

Guideline signatory Raymond Dattwyler endorses the categorical assertion that chronic Lyme disease does not exist yet his patent for novel chimeric nucleic acids and protein antigens which could serve as a basis for a vaccine or for improved immunodiagnostic reagents for Lyme disease, issuing almost contemporaneously with the 2006 IDSA Lyme Disease Guidelines seems to say exactly the opposite:

“Currently, Lyme Disease is treated with a range of antibiotics, e.g. tetracycline, penicillin and cephalosporins. However, such treatment is not always successful in clearing the infection. Treatment is often delayed due to improper diagnosis with the deleterious effect that the infection proceeds to a chronic condition, where treatment with antibiotics is often not useful. One of the factors contributing to delayed treatment is the lack of effective diagnostic tools.” (Dattwyler, et.al. United States Patent 7,179,448)

Letter to Dattwyler: (It should be noted there was no response)

Important Note!: My letter to Dattwylwyler includes a 1995 study from Stony Brook Lyme clinic. I understand the patient received thirteen spinal taps, multiple courses of IV and oral meds, and relapsed after each one, proven by CSF antigens and/or PCR. The only way this patient (said to be a physician) remained in remission was to keep her on open ended clarithromycin which she was taking for 22 months by the time of publication.

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “Raymond_Dattwyler@nymc.edu” <Raymond_Dattwyler@nymc.edu>
Cc: “npjvaccines@nature.com” <npjvaccines@nature.com>, “abarrett@utmb.edu” <abarrett@utmb.edu>, “R.W.Titball@exeter.ac.uk” <R.W.Titball@exeter.ac.uk>, “mgomesso@uthsc.edu” <mgomesso@uthsc.edu>
Date: 01/06/2023 2:46 PM EST
Subject: The year that shaped the outcome of the OspA vaccine for human Lyme disease

npj Vaccines Jan 2022

The year that shaped the outcome of the OspA vaccine for human Lyme disease
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-022-00429-5
Raymond J. Dattwyler & Maria Gomes-Solecki

Department of Microbiology and Immunology

New York Medical College

Valhalla, NY

Raymond J. Dattwyler, Corresponding Author

Dear Dr. Dattwyler,

I read your manuscript with great interest as you call attention to a treatment-resistant Lyme arthritis with “no evidence of DNA” found in the joints of patients after antibiotic treatment.

For some strange reason however, I could not find the following 1995 publication within your paper identifying treatment-resistant neuroborreliosis:

European Neurology 1995

Seronegative Chronic Relapsing Neuroborreliosis
https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/117104

Lawrence C., Lipton R.B., Lowy F.D., Coyle P.K.d

Abstract

We report an unusual patient with evidence of Borrelia burgdorferi infection who experienced repeated neurologic relapses despite aggressive antibiotic therapy. Each course of therapy was associated with a Jarisch-Herxheimer-like reaction. Although the patient never had detectable free antibodies to B. burgdorferi in serum or spinal fluid, the CSF was positive on multiple occasions for complexed anti-B. burgdorferi antibodies, B. burgdorferi nucleic acids and free antigen.

In fact, Dr. Dattwyler there seems to be a great deal of “treatment-resistant” evidence published in multiple journals over the past three decades:

Peer Reviewed Evidence of Persistence of Lyme Disease Spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi and Tick-Borne Diseases (700 References)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/n09sk90eo6xz7ua/700%20articles%20LYME%20EvidenceofPersistence-V2.pdf?dl=0

So that brings me to the reason for this email…

Question:

Does a chronic relapsing seronegative disease fit the vaccine model? If not, would that, in and of itself, be the hidden reason for denying chronic (treatment-resistant) Lyme disease for almost three decades?  In other words, patent royalties and pharmaceutical profits over lifesaving care?

A response to this inquiry is requested.

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH

Cc: Alan D.T. Barrett, PhD Editor-in-Chief

Rick Titball, PhD, DSc, Deputy Editor

Letter to the Editor of the BMJ published June 2020
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1041/rr-1

_______________

**Comment**

BOOM!  Another mic drop from Tuttle.

Seriously, the lunacy is breath-taking.

First Reported U.S. H5N1 Death, COVID Shot Brain Damage & Hundreds of Operational Biolabs

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/first-reported-us-h5n1-bird-flu-death?

First Reported U.S. H5N1 Bird Flu Death, COVID-19 ‘Vaccine’ Brain Damage, and Hundreds of Operational Biolabs

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher on Brannon Howse Live

Please enjoy my interview on Worldview Tube with Brannon Howse, where we discuss breaking public health developments:

  1. The first H5N1 bird flu death ever reported in the United States: The Louisiana Department of Health should release more details — This patient was over 65 years old with multiple underlying health conditions. It’s entirely possible that these pre-existing conditions were the primary cause of death, rather than H5N1 itself. A few weeks ago, Labcorp launched an H5N1 bird flu PCR test in the U.S., now available for order through physicians. As a result, we can expect the Biopharmaceutical Complex to soon use falsely inflated PCR ‘case counts’ and the first reported death as tools to increase public fear of bird flu, driving higher demand for bird flu vaccinations.

  2. Catastrophic Neurological and Psychiatric Damage from COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’Increased risks of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack, myelitis, myasthenia gravis, Alzheimer’s disease, cognitive impairment, depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders.

  3. Biolabs: We need a clean sweep of the hundreds of operational BSL3/BSL4 biolabs that possess modified pathogens with pandemic potential, most of which are located in dense population centers. Since 2001, there have been ~300 confirmed biolab pathogen leaks globally, with the vast majority (78.6%) occurring in the United States. State-sponsored bio-terrorism must be SHUT DOWN to prevent another man-made pandemic.

_______________

For More:

Despite Mounting Evidence & Data, COVID Shots Continue to Kill & Maim

Despite all common sense, repeated warnings, and:

they still have not been removed! 

And now world leaders in 10 countries have received ‘notice of extreme concern’ from a team of experts who are calling for the shots to be banned from public use.

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/global-covid-vaccine-damage-estimates?

Global COVID ‘Vaccine’ Damage Estimates by Edward Dowd

“Killed: 7.5 – 15 million people, Disabled: 29 – 60 million people, Injured: 500 – 900 million people….Arrests made: ZERO”

Global COVID ‘vaccine’ damage estimates by ex-BlackRock executive, whistleblower, Ed Dowd:

Killed: 7.5 – 15 million people

Disabled: 29 – 60 million people

Injured: 500 – 900 million people

5 billion people received mRNA shot(s)

Arrests made: ZERO

Notice that the world appears to be in a constant wars, but in a matter of months every country magically agreed to use an untested, experimental ‘vaccine’ with lipid nanoparticles.

Source: EDWARD DOWD

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/vast-mrna-vaccine-biodistribution?

Vast mRNA ‘Vaccine’ Biodistribution, Persistence, and Adjuvant Toxicity Research Library Published

Over 100 peer-reviewed studies demonstrate serious safety concerns.

A comprehensive research library that contains over 100 peer-reviewed studies (n=130) documenting mRNA “vaccine” biodistribution, persistence, and adjuvant toxicity has just been published (Compiled by Dr. Martin Wucher, MSC Dent Sc (eq DDS), Dr. Byram Bridle, PhD, Erik Sass, et al). You can read it here.

Be sure to also check out their massive Spike protein Pathogenicity Research Library, which has now been updated to include 320 peer reviewed studies.

For those who still believe COVID-19 injections are safe, I encourage you to carefully review the over 400 peer-reviewed studies available in both libraries and then reassess your position.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

http://www.mcculloughfnd.org

_______________


Recently Steve Kirsch gave the following information:
There is no Autism in the Amish community as well as any of the other newer diseases such as ADD, autoimmune disease, PANDAS, PANS, epilepsy, etc.  The U.S. has been studying the Amish for decades, but there’s never been a public report.  The reason is it would show that if you don’t follow government guidelines you’re going to end up healthier.

UN Adopts Controversial Cybercrime Treaty & New Administration Looks to Withdraw From WHO

https://reclaimthenet.org/un-cybercrime-treaty-human-rights-concerns-ratification

UN General Assembly Adopts Controversial Cybercrime Treaty Amid Criticism Over Censorship and Surveillance Risks

Global cybercrime treaty faces scrutiny over human rights safeguards and potential misuse of cross-border powers.
Silhouette of a person holding a phone in front of a large painted eye on a red, textured background.

As we expected, even though opponents have been warning that the United Nations Convention Against Cybercrime needed to have a narrower scope, strong human rights safeguard and be more clearly defined in order to avoid abuse – the UN General Assembly has just adopted the documents, after five years of wrangling between various stakeholders.

It is now up to UN-member states to first sign, and then ratify the treaty that will come into force three months after the 40th country does that.

The UN bureaucracy is pleased with the development, hailing the convention as a “landmark” and “historic” global treaty that will improve cross-border cooperation against cybercrime and digital threats.

But critics have been saying that speech and human rights might fall victim to the treaty since various UN members treat human rights and privacy in vastly different ways – while the treaty now in a way “standardizes” law enforcement agencies’ investigative powers across borders.

Considerable emphasis has been put by some on how “authoritarian” countries might abuse this new tool meant to tackle online crime – but in reality, this concern applies to any country that ends up ratifying the treaty.

Another point of criticism has been that UN members individually already have laws that address the same issues, rendering the convention superfluous – unless it is to extend some of those authoritarian powers to the countries that don’t formally have them, and can’t outright pass them at home for political reasons.

Since the UN General Assembly adopted the resolution without a vote – after the text was previously agreed on by negotiators – it is not immediately clear how many countries might sign it next year, and ratify what would then become a legally binding document.

In the meanwhile, a spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres referred to the treaty as “a demonstration of multilateralism.”

Where opponents see potential for undemocratic law enforcement practices spilling over sovereign borders, UN representatives speak about “an unprecedented platform for cooperation” that will allow agencies to exchange evidence, create a safe cyberspace, and protect victims of crimes such as child sexual abuse, scams and money laundering.

And they claim all this will be achieved “while safeguarding human rights online.” (See link for article)

_______________

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14224123/Trump-withdraw-puppet-Beijing-Covid

Trump looks to withdraw from WHO on first day of his administration after calling the health body a puppet of Beijing for failing to hold China accountable for COVID

Donald Trump‘s presidential transition team is planning an immediate withdrawal from the World Health Organization, an expert familiar with the discussions has said.

The president-elect, 78, has repeatedly called the health body a puppet of Beijing for failing to hold China accountable for the early spread of Covid-19.

Members of Trump’s team have now told experts of their intention to withdraw from the WHO on January 20 – the first day of his second term.

‘I have it on good authority that he plans to withdraw, probably on Day One or very early in his administration,’ said Lawrence Gostin, professor of global health at Georgetown University in Washington and director of the WHO Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law.

The Financial Times was first to report on the plans, citing two experts. The second expert, former White House COVID-19 response coordinator Ashish Jha, was not immediately available for comment.

A withdrawal from the WHO would mark a dramatic shift in US global health policy and further isolate Washington from international efforts to battle pandemics.

The departure would also deny the healthy body of its biggest donor with the US providing the WHO with about 16 per cent of its funding in 2022-23. (See link for article)

For more: