Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Meet the REAL Disinformation Dozen

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/meet-real-disinformation-dozen

Meet The REAL Disinformation Dozen

July 26th 2021 at 4:00 pm


Originally published on www.corbettreport.com

[Note: James Corbett is a highly respected independent journalist who has also experienced deplatforming in the past year. Please support his work and become a member for only $1 a month here.]

Have you heard of “The Disinformation Dozen” yet? They’re the twelve people that, according to The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), “are responsible for almost two-thirds of anti-vaccine content circulating on social media platforms.”

You see, you might think that it is well-documented research about the known short-term effects and unknown long-term effects of the unapproved gene therapy injections that are making people hesitant about sticking the COVID “vaccines” in their arms. But you’d be wrong.

According to the CCDH’s super serious and rigorously researched report on the subject, it is in fact this small group of dedicated disinformationists who have single-handedly warped the minds of millions of poor, innocent social media users. These loathsome liars and avid anti-science activists are, the CCDH informs us, the true source of the public’s misgivings about the jab.

Don’t trust your lying eyes! Believe our good old friends at the mysterious CCDH (who studiously avoid the question of where they get their own fund in the “About” section of their website) when they tell you that it’s this handful of cranks and charlatans who are creating hordes of tinfoil anti-vaxxers with their cunningly crafted tweets and their perfectly persuasive Instagram posts.

So, who are these online gurus, exactly? Who are the social media Svengalis leading the online hordes off of the digital cliffs? Who should we as a society be living in mortal fear of? Why, THESE people, of course!

Are you scared yet? No? Well, how about if we distort the image so they look a little more unhinged?

How about now? Are you suitably terrified?

Yeah, I thought not. Because this is transparent nonsense, of course. It’s a garbage report written by an “advocacy” group whose sole purpose is to eliminate “wrongthink” from the internet and it should not be taken seriously. Sadly, though, as you’ll see in the conclusion to this article, there are people taking it seriously. At the very least, the report is serving its intended purpose of making it seem like there’s some sort of grassroots support behind a campaign for mass government censorship online.

But if they can do it, so can we!

It is in that spirit that I offer today my own “Disinformation Dozen” article listing the twelve people and organizations who have done the most to spread disinformation and panic among the public over the past eighteen months.

TEDROS ADHANOM GHEBREYESUS

As Director-General of the World Health Organization, it’s arguable that no one has done more to lay the groundwork of the biosecurity narrative than Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Like his predecessor, Margaret Chan–who presided over the swine flu and ebola and zika test runs of the scamdemic–Tedros has been the front man for the entire COVID-1984 agenda. It was the WHO that first proposed social distancing as the answer to the generated crisis, and it was Tedros himself who told countries that the constant (false positive-generating) testing of everyone was a necessary public health measure in the New Normal (at the behest of his Gates Foundation paymasters, no doubt). And let’s not forget that it was the WHO that mainstreamed the idea of an “infodemic” of “dangerous online misinformation” that needs to be censored in their February 2020 situation report on the topic, nor that it was Tedros himself who drilled the “infodemic” propaganda home at a press conference that same month.

NEIL FERGUSON

Neil Ferguson may not be the face of the scamdemic or the most famous of the COVID disinformationists, but his provably faulty information has arguably done more to move us into the era of medical martial law than any other single piece of misinformation. Ferguson, as you should know by now, is the man behind the Imperial College model that predicted a tidal wave of deaths in the US and the UK, a projection that provided the fig leaf for politicians in both countries (and, in turn, would-be dictators in other countries) to lock down their populations in the name of “public health.” He was also the man behind a number of similarly over-the-top mortality projections in previous public health scares, including wildly fault death forecasts for the 2005 bird flu scare and the 2009 swine flu scamdemic test run. So how does someone who consistently gets it so wrong get entrusted with constructing yet another faulty model for yet another public health scare? Hint: The Gates Foundation has 79 million reasons why. He was eventually tangled up in his own lies when he was caught cavorting with his mistress in direct contravention of the anti-social distancing rules that he so forcefully advocates for the peasants, but for some reason, despite making a big show of resigning in apparent disgrace for his actions, he is still advising the UK government on their scamdemic response.

YOUTUBE

Of course, all of the major social media companies are culpable in spreading misinformation about the scamdemic online, but YouTube deserves special mention for reasons that should be obvious. By promoting only “authoritative content” from “reliable sources” in the dinosaur mainstream media and burying information from anyone who is not in step with the Great Reset agenda, YouTube has steered hundreds of millions of people around the globe away from the truth about any number of topics in the last several years. But, as we have all seen, that practice of “hiding” information from users has taken the turn into outright censorship over the past 18 months, with video after video and channel after channel being sent down the digital memory hole for daring to tell the truth about the scamdemic. Anyone who still uses the platform to learn the latest news about COVID-1984 (or anything else of political importance) is being actively misinformed on a daily basis and should be considered a dangerous NPC zombie.

LEANA WEN

If you (like me) do not watch CNN, you may not be familiar with Dr. Leana Wen. If that is the case, consider yourself lucky. Your CNN-watching friends (should you have any) will doubtless recognize her as the “expert” that the lying liars at CNN turn to every time they need her to give the establishment position on the COVID-19 gene therapy injections masquerading as “vaccines.” You might remember her from my “Science Says” podcast where she was arguing that the opening up of society should not take place without certain strings attached. Specifically, she opined that it is important for the government to make it clear that “the vaccine is the ticket back to pre-pandemic life” because “we have a very narrow window to tie reopening policy to vaccination status.” This is more or less the message that she (along with her CNN-hosted disinfo pals) is still pushing on CNN every single day. In a sense, you could argue that she’s being quite truthful when she acknowledges that this is about increasing uptake of the “vaccine” and not about protecting the public health, but nevertheless, Dr. Wen deserves to be recognized as a disinformationist of concern for her tireless efforts to push the vaccine passport agenda.

JEN PSAKI

In a sense it’s a no-brainer that the bought-and-paid-for mouthpiece of the White House is going to be one of the biggest purveyors of scamdemic disinfo, but it’s still worth noting White House press secretary Jen Psaki’s role in misinforming hundreds of millions of people. In her regular press briefings she reiterates debunked information from the CDC and other public health bodies that are more interested in getting needles in arms and covering up for vaccine manufacturers than they are in protecting the health of the public. Case in point: Psaki brags in her latest press briefing that–given how the pre-Biden (fake and made up) polls indicated that less than 40% of the population was willing to take the vaccine whereas (they claim) 68% of Americans have taken a shot–“we’ve been able to influence a whole lot of people to change their minds.” Unfortunately, that’s probably true, and that’s why Psaki (and, by extension, all of the other spokespeople for all the other Great Reset agenda-following administrations in countries around the world) deserves to be dishonoured as part of the Disinformation Dozen.

BILL GATES

I suppose I could elaborate on the ways that “Mr. Scamdemic” himself, Bill Gates, is responsible for propagating misinformation about COVID-1984 to the general public, but if you don’t know about that yet I have a two hour documentary you should watch.

THE ONLINE FACT CHECKERS

Remember when FactCheck.org declared that the COVID scamdemic was not presaged by Event 201 because that exercise “dealt with a hypothetical scenario involving a fictional virus”? Remember when Reuters attempted to “fact check” the “conspiracy theories” about Bill Gates by debunking the strawman that “Bill Gates is planning to use microchip implants to fight the coronavirus”? Remember when Vox stealth edited and PolitiFact “updated” their “fact checks” about the COVID lab origin hypothesis? Remember all the other times over the past 18 months that these self-appointed gatekeepers of truth have attempted to gaslight the public about various aspects of this generated crisis? Pepperidge farm remembers. And so does the REAL disinformation dozen list.

SPI-B

The Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviours (aka SPI-B) is not exactly a household name, but it should be. SPI-B is a shadowy group hiding in the bowels of the UK’s bureaucracy that, according to the UK government, is “a subgroup of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), which is chaired by the Government Chief Scientific Adviser (GCSA).” It’s tasked with providing the government with strategies for manipulating the public into behaving the way the politicians want them to. If that sounds perfectly Orwellian, you’re not wrong. In fact, members of the group have recently come out to express their “regret” at their unethical actions, including deliberately ramping up fear in order to scare the public into submission and acceptance of the New Normal. It’s a fascinating story, and that story is available in both short and long forms, but whatever way you slice it, SPI-B has been one of the most egregious purveyors of disinformation in Britain during the scamdemic.

KERRY CHANT

To be fair, this spot on the list could easily have been given to any number of public health officials in provincial backwaters that have used their first taste of power and prestige in their miserable careers to instantly become would-be dictators. I’m sure everyone reading these words could tell a story or two about their own local health official. But let’s acknowledge Kerry Chant, the chief health officer of New South Wales, Australia, for her absolutely outrageous pronouncement this week. Oh, didn’t you hear? In addition to staying home and anti-social distancing and all the usual rigamarole, Kerry Chant is now lecturing Australians that they should NOT EVEN TALK TO THEIR FRIENDS if they happen to bump into them during their “essential” travels. Yes, the government is kindly allowing the plebs out every once in a while for “essential” work or to buy “essential” goods, but don’t you dare speak to your friend during that trip to the store, you prisoner! That’s how the cooties spreads! And the truly unbelievable part about all of this is that many Australians are cheering these measures on. Truly, the disinformationists are warping the minds of the public, and Chant’s remarks are as good a sign of that as any.

JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR.

Given his condition, it may be unfair to include Biden in a list of disinformation agents. But just because the Script-Reader-in-Chief doesn’t understand the script that he’s reading doesn’t mean that he isn’t spreading disinformation to the masses. Case in point: During his train wreck of a town hall last week, Biden asserted that “you’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.” This is, of course, in direct contradiction to what every health body in the world currently holds to be true including Biden’s own CDC and disrupts the new propaganda push about “breakthrough cases” that will naturally be used to convince the public to accept yearly booster shots for the foreseeable future. So will GooTube be censoring the White House channel for contradicting public health body guidance and spreading dangerous information during a deadly scamdemic? Don’t hold your breath.

MATT HANCOCK

We all remember Matt Hancock, the now-disgraced former British Health Secretary who cried (?) tears (?) of joy (?) over the sight of William Shakespeare being jabbed last year. (Oh, and in case you’re keeping track at home, William Shakespeare died shortly thereafter of an “unrelated illness,” which is precisely how that death would not have been reported had he died before receiving the gene therapy injection). You may have also heard about the string of scandals that he was involved in before his fall from grace, a bunch of mostly nothingburgers hyped up by the MSM that only served to reinforce the main narrative that COVID-19 is a terrifying pandemic contagion and we should have all locked down harder and longer and worn even more masks. More to the point, you might have noticed that the affair that caused Hancock’s ultimate downfall was the result of the same “rules for thee, not for me” mindset that seems to afflict many of the Disinformation Dozen (see, for example, Neil Ferguson’s similar scandal from last year). Don’t let them distract you from the main point: The person who was hectoring and lecturing the public to stay home and social distance did not himself break those very rules out of a momentary lapse of judgement. He broke them because he knows they’re BS. He told you with his actions that social distancing is a trick that the political class have played on the population. For this, as well as for the fact that he perpetuated all the scamdemic myths throughout the first 18 months of the scam, Hancock has earned his place in the Disinformation Dozen.

TONY FAUCI

Naturally no list of COVID disinformationists would be complete without the Don of Disinfo himself, Anthony “Fuhgeddaboutit” Fauci. You’ll recall that Fauci was dishonoured with the Dino of Shame at this year’s Fake News Awards for peddling the Fakest News of 2020. It’s not just the fake news he passed along about the IFR rate (which was a key factor in ramping up the scamdemic in the first place). It’s not just his flip-flopping on no-masking or masking or double-masking. It’s not just his documentable lies regarding gain-of-function research or the attempt to deny his previous staements about it. It’s the fact that he’s achieved sainthood in the new religion of scientism, his every pronouncement unquestioningly touted by his devotees (regardless of how blatantly it contradicts his previous pronouncement). He has become for many millions of people the voice of authority in the scamdemic era, and he has used that role to push all of the worst aspects of the biosecurity state, from lockdowns and anti-social distancing to the fraudulent PCR test and, of course, the injections. There’s no telling how much damage this serial misinformer has done during this generated crisis.

IN CONCLUSION

This is all a bit of fun, isn’t it? Making up “Wanted” posters and describing the misinformation that the purveyors of the official COVID-1984 narrative have spread in the past 18 months.

Sadly, no, this is not a game. At least, not for the CCDH, which, in addition to writing their nonsense reports on online “disinformation” are also busily lobbying to censor those voices that they disagree with. Their website lists another dozen censorship campaigns (disguised as “anti-misinformation” campaigns) that they are currently engaged in and they even brag about their success in getting David Icke deplatformed from all of the main social media sites last year.

And any guess whose report Amy Klobuchar is citing in her latest push to pass a bill that will “hold platforms accountable for misinformation during health crises”? Why, the CCDH’s Disinformation Dozen report, of course.

This is not a game. There are many overlapping agendas that are playing out in this scamdemic, but make no mistake: one agenda item for the globalists is the elimination of the online alternative media outlets that have been opposing their efforts for decades now.

To be absolutely crystal clear: I am NOT calling for the REAL Disinformation Dozen to be censored in any way. In fact, I want them to be given a platform to speak, because I genuinely believe that it is only in the free exchange of ideas and information (even misinformation) among free peoples that we can possibly hope to discover the truth. I am also not stupid enough to think that if I (or anyone I associated with) somehow magically found themselves in the position of being able to wield the power of censorship, that that power would never be wielded against me in the future.

No, censorship is not the answer. Exactly the opposite. Censorship is the hallmark of tyrants. So when you see these “Disinformation Dozen” lists come out of nowhere from shadowy groups and get bandied about as a basis for deplatforming people online, you should know exactly what kind of enemy you’re up against.


Call to Action

On July 20th, the President of the US accused 12 individuals of “killing people” with misinformation, including Sayer Ji, founder of Greenmedinfo.com, and co-founder of Stand for Health Freedom, a non-profit advocacy organization dedicated to defending informed consent, parental rights, and health freedom. You can learn more about this attack against free speech and health freedom in Sayer’s official statement here.

The attacks are meant to distract from the tens if not hundreds of millions of individuals who have freely expressed their First Amendment protected speech and exercised their freedom to withdrawal consent from experimental and compulsory medical procedures. To stand up with the 12 individuals and show our elected officials that there is a massive and growing grassroots movement dedicated to protecting our basic human, civil, medical and Constitutionally protected rights, take 30 seconds to engage our campaign MORE THAN 12 here:

We will all stand or fall together. Please take action here.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

Natural Infection Vs Vaccination: Which Gives More Protection?

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/309762

Natural infection vs vaccination: Which gives more protection?

Nearly 40% of new COVID patients were vaccinated – compared to just 1% who had been infected previously.
David Rosenberg , Jul 13 , 2021 9:24 AM
COVID-19 vaccine

COVID-19 vaccine

iStock

Coronavirus patients who recovered from the virus were far less likely to become infected during the latest wave of the pandemic than people who were vaccinated against COVID, according to numbers presented to the Israeli Health Ministry.

Health Ministry data on the wave of COVID outbreaks which began this May show that Israelis with immunity from natural infection were far less likely to become infected again in comparison to Israelis who only had immunity via vaccination.

More than 7,700 new cases of the virus have been detected during the most recent wave starting in May, but just 72 of the confirmed cases were reported in people who were known to have been infected previously – that is, less than 1% of the new cases.

Roughly 40% of new cases – or more than 3,000 patients – involved people who had been infected despite being vaccinated.  (See link for article)

____________________

**Comment**

And this is what has been known about natural immunity for decades until the powers that be began rewriting history, utilizing Newspeak.

According to Beda Stadler, former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, a biologist and professor emeritus:

  1. Firstly, it was wrong to claim that this virus was novel.
  2. Secondly, It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus.
  3. Thirdly, it was the crowning of stupidity to claim that someone could have Covid-19 without any symptoms at all or even to pass the disease along without showing any symptoms whatsoever.Telling quote:

    “The entire world simply claimed that there was no immunity…..that wasn’t science, but pure speculation based on a gut feeling that was then parroted by everyone.” Beda Stadler

For more:

The risk-benefit calculus is therefore clear: the experimental vaccines are needless, ineffective and dangerous. Actors authorizing, coercing or administering experimental COVID-19 vaccination are exposing populations and patients to serious, unnecessary, and unjustified medical risks.

Gold Standard COVID Science in Practice: An Interdisciplinary Symposium

Gold Standard Covid Science in Practice

An Interdisciplinary Symposium

calling for immediate intervention

Presented by Doctors for Covid Ethics

Hosted by UK Column

July 29th and 30th

17.00pm – 22.00pm BST

23 Speakers over Two Days

Day 1

Session I: The False Pandemic

Session II: The Going Direct Reset

Tips From a Personal Trainer

Day 2

Session III: First Do No Harm

Session IV: The Hour of Justice

Closing Panel Session

Including

Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi MD

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

Dr. Michael Yeadon

Professor Martin Haditsch

Catherine Austin Fitts

Dr. Thomas Binder

Associate Professor Michael Palmer

Professor Dennis Rancourt

Program Day 1

Thursday, 29 July

Session I with Prof. Martin Haditsch: The False Pandemic

17:00

Greetings and introduction

Opening Statement by Sucharit Bhakdi

17:10

“The SARS-CoV-2 Genome The evidence of its artificial origin”                 

Opening Plenary by Michael Palmer

17.30

The Laboratory Pandemic

With Ulrike Kämmerer

17.50

The False Pandemic

With Denis Rancourt

18.10

Planned Lockdown

A dialogue with Stefan Homburg and Sucharit Bhakdi

18.30

The Power of Masks

Conversation with Josef Thoma, Harald Walach and Martin Haditsch

18.50

“The Powerless Doctors”

Debate with Sam White, Thomas Binder, Charles Hoffe and Martin Haditsch

19.20

Panel Discussion

With all Session I participants lead by Martin Haditsch

Session II with Catherine Austin Fitts: The Going Direct Reset

19.50

The Going Direct Reset: The Pandemic is a Monetary Event

With John Titus

20.10

UK Central Bankers & the Economic Drivers

Discussion with Richard Werner, Catherine Austin Fitts and Taylor Hudak

20.30

How to Decentralize Control

Discussion with Richard Werner, Mark Skidmore, Patrick Wood and Catherine Austin Fitts

21.00

Panel Discussion

With all session II participants lead by Taylor Hudak

21.45

First Day Wrap Up and the program for the 2nd day

With Catherine Austin Fitts, Michael Palmer, Taylor Hudak

Program Day 2

Friday July 30

Session III with Michael Palmer: First Do No Harm

17.00

The Propaganda Matrix

The complicit role of the media

With Taylor Hudak, Patrick Henningsen, Michael Meyen and Catherine Austin Fitts

17.30

Vaccines: Emergency Authorization Abused                    

With Mike Yeadon

17.50

Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of mRNA vaccines                 

With Michael Palmer and Sucharit Bhakdi

18.10

The End of the Narrative                 

With Sucharit Bhakdi and Michael Palmer

18.40

Panel Discussion on Vaccinations                 

With Mike Yeadon, Sucharit Bhakdi, Michael Palmer and Taylor Hudak

19.00

Debate on Vaccine Passports

With Patrick Henningsen and Guests

Session IV : The Hour of Justice

19.30

Reviving the Nuremberg Codex                  

Conversation with Vera Sharav, Sucharit Bhakdi and Catherine Austin Fitts

19.50

The Hour of Justice                 

With Reiner Feullmich, Vera Sharav, Mary Holland, Patrick Henningsen and Guest

20.30

Final Panel Discussion

With Sucharit Bhakdi, Thomas Binder, Catherine Austin Fitts and Reiner Fuellmich, led by Michael Palmer

21.45

Closing Remarks by Sucharit Bhakdi

 

Go here for lifestream.

Science Journals Engaged in Massive Disinformation Campaign

**UPDATE Sept. 2022**

This important article shows how medical journals and 86% of clinical trials are funded by Big Pharma, which means journal articles are nothing more than marketing machines.

https://takecontrol.substack.com/p/science-journals-disinformation-campaign

Science journals engaged in massive disinformation campaign

These highly regarded scientific journals got caught censoring important facts and stifling scientific debate, deriding anything that didn’t protect their Chinese interests

by Dr. Joseph Mercola

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • The Lancet and Nature have both promoted the natural origin theory for SARS-CoV-2, and protected the theory by refusing to publish counter arguments and/or publishing scientific statements by individuals with serious conflicts of interest
  • The Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission included Peter Daszak, Ph.D., president of EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit organization that collaborated with various universities and organizations on research in China, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). He was recently taken off the Commission due to controversy over his large number of conflicts of interest
  • The Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission also includes Danielle Anderson, an Australian WIV virologist who left Wuhan shortly before the pandemic broke out. Anderson says she “does not believe” the virus is manmade. Anderson’s Commission biography does not mention that she worked at the WIV
  • In January 2021, 14 global experts submitted a letter to The Lancet in which they argued that “the natural origin is not supported by conclusive arguments and that a lab origin cannot be formally discarded.” The submission was rejected with the justification that the topic was “not a priority” for the journal
  • Richard Horton, the editor-in-chief of The Lancet is now being criticized for his long defense and support of the Chinese regime, and is accused of using The Lancet to pursue political causes and stifle scientific debate

More than a year ago, in February 2020, a group of 27 scientists wrote a letter published in The Lancet condemning “conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”1

Although The Lancet — like other medical journals — requires contributors to disclose financial or personal interests that might be viewed as possible conflicts of interests with their submissions, the 27 authors declared they had “no competing interests.”

June 21, 2021, The Lancet published an addendum admitting that “some readers have questioned the validity of this disclosure, particularly as it relates to one of the authors, Peter Daszak.”2

As a result, The Lancet asked the 27 signers to “re-evaluate” their competing interests and to declare any “financial and nonfinancial relationships that may be relevant to interpreting the content of their manuscript.” So far, Daszak has updated his previous claim of having no competing interests to include a 416-word disclosure statement clarifying that, indeed, he had several conflicts of interest.

First, he is the president of EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit organization that receives funding from a “range of U.S. Government funding agencies and non-governmental sources.”

Second — and most importantly — Daszak also explained that, although its work with China is currently unfunded, he and the Alliance have collaborated with various universities and organizations on research in China, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). Specifically, this work includes studies of bats and viruses, including “the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines.”

The Lancet Accused of Kowtowing to China

The COVID pandemic has brought attention to any number of problems within the academic arena. Disturbingly, we’ve discovered that scientific journals held in high regard for many decades — The Lancet has been around for 198 years — are colluding to censor important facts and stifle scientific debate. The Lancet statement deriding the lab leak theory as a conspiracy theory to be ignored is a prime example. As reported by the Daily Mail, June 26, 2021:3

“The Lancet letter, signed by 27 experts, played a key part in silencing scientific, political and media discussion of any idea that this pandemic might have begun with a lab incident rather than spilling over naturally from animals.

It was even reportedly used by Facebook to flag articles exploring the lab leak hypothesis as ‘false information’ … Yet it emerged later that The Lancet statement was covertly drafted by British scientist Peter Daszak — a long-term collaborator with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was carrying out high-risk research on bat coronaviruses and had known safety issues …

Four months later, The Lancet set up a ‘Covid-19 Commission’ to assist governments and scrutinize the origins. It was led by Jeffrey Sachs … Incredibly, he backed Daszak to lead his commission’s 12-person taskforce investigating Covid’s origins — joined by five fellow signatories to The Lancet statement …

Last week The Lancet finally ‘recused’ him from its commission and published an ‘addendum’ to its statement detailing some of his Chinese links. Yet critics say the journal has still failed to admit that six more signatories to that February statement have ties to Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance as directors or partners.

‘It would have been better for The Lancet to have stated that Daszak’s and other signers’ previous declarations were untruthful and to have attached an editorial expression of concern,’ said Richard Ebright, a bio-security expert and professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University in New Jersey.

Now The Mail on Sunday has learned that The Lancet is set to publish a second statement by these signatories that presses the case that Covid probably emerged through natural ‘zoonotic’ transmission from animals to humans.”

Richard Horton, the editor-in-chief of The Lancet is now being criticized for his long defense and support of the Chinese regime, and is accused of using The Lancet to pursue political causes and stifle scientific debate.4

In January 2021, 14 global experts submitted a letter to The Lancet in which they argued that “the natural origin is not supported by conclusive arguments and that a lab origin cannot be formally discarded.” Horton rejected the submission, stating it was “not a priority” for the journal.5

“The Lancet also published an entirely made up study claiming hydroxychloroquine was dangerous. This fraudulent paper made the media rounds and led to countries banning the drug’s use against COVID-19.”

Any medical journal worthy of a good reputation needs to be an open platform for wide-ranging debate. Horton’s refusal to publish the other side of the origins argument has without a doubt damaged the credibility and reputation of the journal. Tory MP Bob Seely told the Daily Mail:6

“The claims of a cover-up over the most important scientific issue of our time grow stronger by the day. It is vital we get to the truth over what appears to have been a cover-up on the pandemic origins with the collusion of journals such as The Lancet.”

Let’s also remember that The Lancet published an entirely fake study claiming hydroxychloroquine was dangerous. This paper using completely fabricated data made the media rounds and led to countries banning the drug’s use against COVID-19.

This too raises serious questions about the journal’s credibility. How was this fraud not discovered during the peer review process? Could it be that The Lancet allowed it because it would help protect the roll-out of profitable new COVID drugs and “vaccines”?

What’s Behind Science Journals’ Censorship?

What could possibly be behind science journals’ decision to silence debate in what appears to be a concerted effort to protect Chinese interests? In a June 18, 2021, article,7 Matt Ridley suggests it might have to do with the fact that “scientific papers have become increasingly dependent on the fees that Chinese scientists pay to publish in them, plus advertisements from Chinese firms and subscriptions from Chinese institutions.”

The Lancet is not alone in its less than objective stance on China. In 2017, the Nature journal admitted it censors articles containing words like “Taiwan,” “Tibet” and “cultural revolution” in its Chinese editions at the request of the Chinese government.8 “In April 2020 Nature ran an editorial apologizing for its ‘error’ in ‘associating the virus with Wuhan’ in its news coverage,” Ridley writes.9

Nature also attached an editorial note to several old articles, saying they were being misused “as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered,” and that “there is no evidence that this is true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus.”

One of those articles, published in 2015, was titled “Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research.” The research being questioned was done by WIV researchers.

Gaslighting Alert: Abusers Now Play the Victim Card

For the past year and a half, scientists, doctors, reporters and anyone else who dared point out blatant discrepancies in the natural origins narrative have been attacked and painted as quacks and dangerous conspiracy theorists. They’ve been censored, deplatformed and publicly defamed and shamed. Many a fine career has been ruined or seriously tarnished by baseless personal attacks.

Now that undeniable evidence is finally reaching critical mass, natural origin defenders are playing the victim card. For example, Amy Maxmen, Ph.D., a journalist for Nature for the past 13 years, has been covering the SARS-CoV-2 origin debate. In a May 26, 2021, tweet, she stated the “debate over a lab-leak has become toxic and risky.”10

Angela Rasmussen, Ph.D., a natural origin proponent, responded saying that “the origins debate has become a toxic milieu dominated by opportunists, dilettantes, racist/misogynist assholes, and trolls.”11 Rasmussen claims she’s been personally attacked and abused for trying to explain the natural origin theory.

The irony is that the same people who abused others for talking about the lab leak theory are now getting a taste of their own medicine, and they don’t like it. They’re the ones who have been peddling misinformation all along, and as the masses are catching on to the deceit, they’re catching heat.

To deflect and finger-point yet again, abusers are now playing the victim. Another tactic is to claim that attacks on them are attacks on science itself. Dr. Anthony Fauci, for example, has stated this on more than one occasion already.12 13 In a June 2021 MSNBC interview, Fauci said criticizing him was “very dangerous,” and that: 14 15

“A lot of what you’re seeing as attacks on me quite frankly are attacks on science because all of the things I have spoken about from the very beginning have been fundamentally based on science … If you are trying to get at me as a public health official and scientist, you’re really attacking not only Dr. Anthony Fauci, you are attacking science.”

His comments didn’t go over well, based on social media responses.16 Reporter Glenn Greenwald’s Tweet will suffice to summarize the general consensus:17

“Beyond the dangerous arrogance and pomposity of proclaiming ‘anyone who criticizes me is attacking Science’ — thus placing himself off-limits from questioning — he *admitted* he purposely issued false, anti-science, politicized claims … Once you *admit* that you made false statements in violation of The Science™, you don’t then get to equate yourself to The Science™ such that attacks on you are attacks on it.”

Another example is that of Dr. Peter Hotez, one of the most shockingly hateful people in the medical field who has publicly stated he wants to “snuff out” vaccine skeptics and has called for cyberwarfare measures to be deployed against me and others who share vaccine safety information. Coincidentally, this public plea was published in the journal Nature.18

This man, who has spewed all sorts of vile language at parents of vaccine-injured children and called for physical harm and imprisonment of people who don’t agree with the one-size-fits-all vaccine agenda is now complaining about getting bombarded with “anti-vaxx hate speech.”19

Billions of Dollars at Stake

To circle back to the question of why prominent and previously respected science journals are publishing propaganda and suppressing open discussion, the most likely reason — aside from their dependence on Chinese publishing fees and advertising dollars — is the fact that if SARS-CoV-2 is proven to be a manmade virus that escaped from a lab (regardless of its location), billions of dollars in funding for gain-of-function research and even vaccine research could evaporate.

As a publisher of research, it makes sense that journals would be willing to protect the research industry as a whole, and provide a platform for chosen spokespeople — such as Hotez — who shamelessly promote the official narrative, no matter how tenuous or unscientific it might be, or how clear the conflicts of interest.

Here’s another case in point: June 28, 2021, Bloomberg tweeted out a short video featuring Danielle Anderson, an Australian WIV virologist who left Wuhan shortly before the pandemic broke out. Anderson says she “does not believe” the virus is manmade. In response, Hotez tweeted:20

“And we’re in agreement: SARS-2 coronavirus has natural origins, was not produced through GOF [gain-of-function] research, and probably has nothing to do with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Coincidentally, Anderson is also on The Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission,21 the same Commission that Daszak was on. Her Lancet Commission bio22 says nothing about her work at the WIV, only that she is a senior research fellow at the University of Melbourne, Australia. Why is that? Is Anderson’s link to the WIV yet another “random coincidence” that has no bearing on her message? Or is it part of a pattern?

I believe the engineering of viruses and other pathogens is one of the greatest threats to life on earth at this point. We lucked out with SARS-CoV-2, as it turned out to be far less lethal than initially predicted. The next time we might not be so lucky.

As reported in July 2020, China has plans to erect high-security biolabs in all of its 23 provinces, despite concerns about leakage risks.23 Worldwide, there are hundreds of laboratories where this kind of research is taking place on a daily basis. Considering the history of lab leaks, it’s only a matter of time before something truly nasty gets out.

This is why we must get to the bottom of where SARS-CoV-2 came from. We must know if it was manmade because, if so, we need to ban gain-of-function research aimed at making pathogens more dangerous to humans.

Yes, there are harmless gain-of-function experiments, and that’s not what we’re talking about here, although, harmless experiments can, of course, be steps in a process that ultimately results in a dangerous bioweapon. Overall, I think we need to seriously reconsider the need and value of genetic manipulation of viruses and the creation of synthetic ones.

reprinted with permission

Sources:

____________________

For more:

CDC Stops Counting ‘Non Severe’ “Vaccinated” COVID Cases Back in May. Lowers PCR for “Vaccinated” in April – Nothing to See Here

https://www.businessinsider.com/risk-of-delta-variant-cdc-stopped-tracking-cases-vaccinated-2021-7

The CDC stopped tracking most COVID-19 cases in vaccinated people. That makes it hard to know how dangerous Delta really is.

coronavirus testing
A nurse administers a COVID-19 test at a testing site in Suffolk County, New York, on December 18, 2020.   John Paraskevas/Newsday via Getty ImagesImportant excerpts from article below:
  • The CDC stopped monitoring non-severe COVID-19 cases among vaccinated people in May.
  • It’s hard to assess Delta’s risk without knowing what mild breakthrough cases look like — or whether they’re becoming more common.

Since May 1, the agency has only reported and investigated coronavirus infections among vaccinated people that resulted in hospitalization or death.

In a recent blog post for Harvard Health Publishing, Robert Shmerling, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, called the CDC’s decision not to track all breakthrough cases “surprising” and “disappointing.”

The coronavirus is going to stick around forever. Get ready for the new normal.  (See link for article)

____________________

**Comment**

While the article is riddled with inaccuracies, the take-away here is the CDC has STOPPED counting the majority of cases in “vaccinated” people.  I reported on this fact earlier but it bares mentioning again as this decision is muddying all data being used, which is supplying the rhetoric and tyrannical action.  There is no way to know the impact of anything at this point, with data purposely twisted for a predetermined outcome.

BTW: it was done numerous times before:

But the fun doesn’t end here.

In April, the CDC issued new guidance to laboratories recommending reducing the RT-PCR CT value to 28 cycles, but only for those fully “vaccinated” individuals being tested for COVID.

In other words, lowering the CT threshold parameter will lead to missing infectious persons, and will give the illusion that “vaccinated” people aren’t contracting COVID.

The first question you must ask is, why would the CDC do such a thing?  When you understand their MO; the long and sordid history of corruption, conflicts of interest, and rigging variables for their own nefarious purposesyou can quickly surmise why.  They don’t want people to know the full story, because the full story would reveal that these “break-through” cases (getting COVID after being fully immunized) are far more prolific than the CDC wants to admit to – proving the injections are unnecessary and ineffective.

“Breakthrough” cases can also be deadly, with one study showing 6% end in death. As of June 28, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports 4,686 breakthrough cases resulting in death and hospitalization.

But these deaths and maimed bodies don’t matter, because it’s all for the greater good.

For some historical perspective, watch how “60 Minutes”covered the 1976 swine flu mass vaccination program which was halted after 4,000 reported adverse events.  In contrast, there are 463,457 adverse events reported after the COVID injections from December 2020 to July, 2021, and less than 1% are typically recorded.

For anyone reading this website, you already understand that the CDC owns the patents on not only the very pathogens, but on the testing which it rigs for its own pre-determined outcome. They’ve been doing this with Lyme/MSIDS for over 40 years and continue to get away with arbitrary testing cut-offs, which keeps thousands from diagnosis and treatment.  They are quite experienced at twisting data.

The inconvenient truths that the injections aren’t effective, safe, or needed isn’t good for Big Pharma, Big Tech, mainstream media, FDA, CDC, NIH, or our governmentall of which stand to gain from these lucrative gene-therapy injections that aren’t vaccines.

Important quote:

“By tracking only cases requiring hospitalization or causing death, we may miss the chance to learn how people with ‘milder’ disease are affected by Delta or other variant infections, such as how long their symptoms last and how the infection may disrupt their lives.” Robert Shmerling, associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School

But, that is exactly the point.

Now only severe cases will be recorded, to downplay the fact the injections don’t stop infection or death.

Further, they are paying students to persuade people to get the jab and attempting to divide us by blaming the unvaccinated for the pandemic, particularly those who vote conservatively, even though numerous polls and studies have proven this tenant is inaccurate.

Meanwhile, these same corrupt ‘authorities’ are censoring and bad-mouthing cheap, effective treatments that work, so a misinformed public continues to believe their only recourse is to get the dangerous but lucrative COVID shots, our own government developed.

They are also hiding the number of fully “vaccinated” White House staffers who have contracted COVID.
Contracting COVID after being “vaccinated” is an inconvenient truth for the powers that be that must be denied at all costs.

For more: