Archive for the ‘Treatment’ Category

Heparin As A Therapy For COVID-19: Current Evidence and Future Possibilities

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32519894/

. 2020 Jun 10.

doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00199.2020.Online ahead of print.

Heparin as a Therapy for COVID-19: Current Evidence and Future Possibilities

Affiliations expand

Abstract

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), the clinical syndrome associated with infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has impacted nearly every country in the world. Despite an unprecedented focus of scientific investigation, there is a paucity of evidence-based pharmacotherapies against this disease. Due to this lack of data-driven treatment strategies, broad variations in practice patterns have emerged. Observed hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients has created debate within the critical care community on the therapeutic utility of heparin. We seek to provide an overview of the data supporting the therapeutic use of heparin, both unfractionated and low molecular weight, as an anticoagulant for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Additionally, we review preclinical evidence establishing biological plausibility for heparin and synthetic heparin-like drugs as therapies for COVID-19 through anti-viral and anti-inflammatory effects. Finally, we discuss known adverse effects and theoretical off-target effects that may temper enthusiasm for the adoption of heparin as a therapy in COVID-19 without confirmatory prospective randomized controlled trials. Despite previous failures of anticoagulants in critical illness, plausibility of heparin for COVID-19 is sufficiently robust to justify urgent randomized controlled trials to determine the safety and effectiveness of this therapy.

_______________________

**Comment**

Heparin has also been used successfully for Lyme/MSIDS in many patients.  While not curative, it does help many symptoms for those who suddenly find they have hyper coagulation.  My husband used it and it made a huge difference.  He has since successfully switched to

Interestingly, heparin used prophylactically has prevented Lyme in vitro:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/02/05/non-anticoagulant-heparin-as-a-pre-exposure-prophylaxis-prevents-lyme-disease-infection/

Excerpt:

The drug heparin is structurally similar to these GAGs and inhibits Bbsl attachment to PGs, GAGs, cells, and tissues, suggesting its potential to prevent LD. However, the anticoagulant activity of heparin often results in hemorrhage, hampering the development of this compound as LD PrEP.

 

 

 

 

Co-infections Among COVID-19 Patients: The Need for Combination Therapy With Non-Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Agents?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118220301274

Co-infections among patients with COVID-19: The need for combination therapy with non-anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents?

Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Abstract

Co-infection has been reported in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome, but there is limited knowledge on co-infection among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The prevalence of co-infection was variable among COVID-19 patients in different studies, however, it could be up to 50% among non-survivors. Co-pathogens included bacteria, such as

  • Streptococcus pneumoniae
  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • Klebsiella pneumoniae
  • Mycoplasma pneumoniae
  • Chlamydia pneumonia
  • Legionella pneumophila
  • Acinetobacter baumannii
  • Candida species
  • Aspergillus flavus
  • viruses such as influenza, coronavirus, rhinovirus/enterovirus, parainfluenza, metapneumovirus, influenza B virus, and human immunodeficiency virus

Influenza A was one of the most common co-infective viruses, which may have caused initial false-negative results of real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Laboratory and imaging findings alone cannot help distinguish co-infection from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Newly developed syndromic multiplex panels that incorporate SARS-CoV-2 may facilitate the early detection of co-infection among COVID-19 patients. By contrast, clinicians cannot rule out SARS-CoV-2 infection by ruling in other respiratory pathogens through old syndromic multiplex panels at this stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, clinicians must have a high index of suspicion for coinfection among COVID-19 patients. Clinicians can neither rule out other co-infections caused by respiratory pathogens by diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection nor rule out COVID-19 by detection of non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory pathogens.

After recognizing the possible pathogens causing co-infection among COVID-19 patients, appropriate antimicrobial agents can be recommended.

_____________________

**Comment**

This would explain why COVID-19 does not resemble a simple virus, just as Lyme disease doesn’t present identically from individual to individual. Lyme/MSIDS is also best treated with combination therapy; however, most regular practitioners follow the antiquated and unscientific CDC treatment guidelines which haven’t worked for over 40 years (which in a nutshell is 21 days of doxycycline for all despite body weight and coinfections).

With each day there seems to be more and more similarities to Lyme/MSIDS in that cases are complex and individual. Medicine needs to acknowledge and embrace this complexity:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/26/cdc-playbook-learning-from-lyme/

This also explains why things like antibiotics and anti-parasitics work.  The pathogen list did not include tick-borne pathogens but should, as undoubtedly many of these people could very well have undiagnosed infections that COVID-19, much like vaccines, can reactivate latent infections: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/12/02/scottish-doctor-gives-insight-on-lyme-msids/

AAPS Sues FDA for ‘Irrational’ Interference of Access to Life-Saving Hydroxychloroquine

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/06/association-american-physicians-surgeons-sues-fda-irrational-interference-access-life-saving-hydroxychloroquine/

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Sues FDA for “Irrational” Interference of Access to Life-Saving Hydroxychloroquine

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (https://aapsonline.org) filed a lawsuit against Department of Health and Human Services and the FDA for “irrational interference” by the FDA with timely access to hydroxychloroquine.

Never in history have we seen such a determined effort by the scientific community and pharmaceutical industry to downplay and lie about the use of a successful drug to treat a deadly disease.

Hydroxychloroquine is the first choice in a study of 6,000 doctors treating the coronavirus.  In the field and in independent testing hydroxychloroquine displayed amazing results in treating the COVID-19 virus.

But there was great pushback against hydroxychloroquine for two reasons. The first reason was because it was safe and very inexpensive. The second reason is because Donald Trump promoted its use. (See link for article)

___________________

**Comment**

Just today, the FDA just doesn’t care what works in the clinical setting and gives a big fat NO to HCQ:  https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/87066?xid=NL_breakingnewsalert_2020-06-

The purpose of recent HCQ paper in the Lancet was to create uncertainty and skepticism in the drug’s ability to treat COVID-19 because the authors have financial ties to big Pharma.  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/06/fraudulent-hcq-covid-19-study-in-lancet-exposed/

They, along with authorities who also have financial conflicts, want to promote more expensive pharmaceutical options – including Remdesivir. HCQ has shown success in studies around the world, is cheap, has been used safely for decades, and has clinical benefit to certain patients early in the disease process:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/01/rebuttal-on-huge-hcq-study-in-lancet/

Science has been hijacked as well:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/06/fraudulent-hcq-covid-19-study-in-lancet-exposed/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/12/former-french-health-minister-blows-whistle-criminal-pressure-from-bigpharma-on-publications-means-theres-no-longer-any-real-science/

Excerpt:  

The Lancet’s boss, Horton, said:

“Now we are not going to be able to, basically, if this continues, publish any more clinical research data, because the pharmaceutical companies are so financially powerful today and are able to use such methodologies, as to have us accept papers which are apparently methodologically perfect but which, in reality, manage to conclude what they want to conclude

Until the Bayh-Dole Act is repealed, our own government, which is entrusted with public health, is allowed to own patents competing with the private sector. They then are entrusted to set public policy including treatment guidelines despite this conflict of interest.  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/20/cdc-crimes-possible-sherman-provisions-clayton-acts-violated/ This link shows that our own government, regarding COVID-19, violated the Sherman Act by taking U.S. tax dollars to China to do coronavirus research as well as violated the Clayton Act by entering into trade among states.

Here’s the successful HCQ studies the FDA must not be looking at:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/09/hcq-breakthrough-icmr-finds-its-effective-in-preventing-coronavirus-expands-its-use/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/22/new-study-hcq-zinc-greatly-reduces-covid-19-health-risk/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/11/podcast-evidence-supporting-hcq-azithromycin-for-covid-19/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/24/dr-oz-interviews-dr-didier-raoult-on-hydroxychloroquine-study-for-covid-19/

Regarding effective COVID treatments, the CDC has stonewalled another one as well:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/02/successful-covid-19-critical-care-stonewalled-by-cdc/

According to Kory, the FLCCCs MATH+ protocol has been delivered to the White House on four occasions, yet no interest has been shown. Worse, he says they continue to be stonewalled by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute for Health. Why?

Isn’t saving lives, right now, and by any means possible, more important than pushing for a vaccine? If the MATH+ protocol works with near-100% effectiveness, a vaccine may not even be necessary. The MATH+ protocol gets its name from:

Intravenous MethylprednisoloneHigh-dose intravenous Ascorbic acid

Plus optional treatments Thiamine, zinc and vitamin D

Full dose low molecular weight Heparin

You quickly come to the conclusion that there are people who would rather see patients remain sick.

The Functional Medicine Approach to COVID-19: Virus-Specific Nutraceutical & Botanical Agents

https://www.ifm.org/news-insights/the-functional-medicine-approach-to-covid-19-virus-specific-nutraceutical-and-botanical-agents/

The Functional Medicine Approach to COVID-19: Virus-Specific Nutraceutical and Botanical Agents

Updated April 7, 2020

Background and Introduction

Health professionals and the public must be well informed about the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the disease it causes (COVID-19), and how it spreads. This information is readily available and not within the scope of this document. At this time, there are no specific vaccines or uniformly successful treatments for COVID-19. In this context of insufficient evidence, the scope of this document will be to assess the scientific plausibility of promising prevention approaches and therapeutic (nutraceutical and botanical) interventions and then to offer clinical recommendations. This article is part one of a series. Click here to view part two.

With respect to interventions, the practice of Functional Medicine emphasizes the primacy of safety, validity, and effectiveness. In the novel context of COVID-19, validity in the form of published evidence is lacking. Therefore, “validity” relies upon inferences from the mechanisms of action of individual agents and/or published outcomes data supporting their mitigating effects on illness from other viral strains. Likewise, data for the “effectiveness” of interventions targeting the viral mechanisms of COVID-19 are nascent and rapidly emerging. In this context, the following recommendations represent the Functional Medicine approach to the COVID-19 crisis:

  • Adherence to all health recommendations from official sources to decrease viral transmission.
  • Optimizing modifiable lifestyle factors in order to improve overall immune function (an introductory document on boosting immunity is available here). This should reduce progression from colonization to illness.
  • Personalized consideration of therapeutic agents that may:
    • Favorably modulate cellular defense and repair mechanisms.
    • Favorably modulate viral-induced pathological cellular processes.
    • Promote viral eradication or inactivation.
    • Mitigate collateral damage from other therapeutic agents.
    • Promote resolution of collateral damage and restoration of function.
  • Treatment of confirmed COVID-19 illness (as per conventional standards and practice):
    • May reduce the severity and duration of acute symptoms and complications.
    • May support recovery and reduce long-term morbidity and sequelae.

Additional references are being collated and will be made available in the future.

Clinical Recommendations and Mechanisms of Action

BACKGROUND AND MECHANISMS OF ACTION

We encourage practitioners to learn about the mechanism of invasion, replication, and pathophysiology of the COVID-19 virus. Much of what we know has been extrapolated from basic science research on SARS-CoV-2. Excellent resources are available online, including the free YouTube lectures through Dr. Roger Seheult: 

This document discusses the mechanisms of action of a number of different botanical and nutraceutical agents. These agents can be considered as immunoadjuvants, defined as substances that act to accelerate, prolong, or enhance antigen-specific immune responses by potentiating or modulating the immune response.[1]

A coronavirus such as SARS-CoV-2 can be deadly because of its ability to stimulate a part of the innate immune response called the inflammasome, which can cause uncontrolled release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, leading to cytokine storm and severe, sometimes irreversible, damage to respiratory epithelium.[2] The SARS-CoV-2 virus has been shown to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome.[3,4] A 2016 review article[5] entitled “Natural compounds as regulators of NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated IL-beta production” notes that “resveratrol, curcumin, EGCG [epigallocatechin gallate], and quercetin are potent inhibitors of NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated IL-1beta production, typically acting at more than one element of the involved pathways. However, it should be noted that these polyphenols have an even much broader biological effect, as they influence a variety of pathways.” For example, these polyphenols modulate NF-kB upregulation, which is useful to counteract the COVID-19 ’hyper-inflammation.[6]

A preprint released on March 23, 2020, identified the ability of plant bioactive compounds to inhibit the COVID-19 main protease (Mpro),[7] which is necessary for viral replication. There is much excitement surrounding the recent identification of Mpro, and it is a current potential pharmaceutical drug target. Kaempferol, quercetin, luteolin-7-glucoside, demethoxycurcumin, naringenin, apigenin-7glucoside, oleuropein, curcumin, catechin, and epicatechin-gallate were the natural compounds that appeared to have the best potential to act as COVID-19 Mpro inhibitors. Though further research is necessary to prove their efficacy, this study provides the biologic plausibility and mechanistic support (SARS-CoV-2 protease inhibition) to justify their use.

For these reasons, we recommend the following compounds, at standard dosages, to prevent activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, to decrease NF-kB activation, and to potentially inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication. There is no literature to support a regimen of a single vs. multiple agents. Our recommendation is to use higher dosing and/or multiple agents when patient contextual factors (e.g., patient desire, pre-existing inflammation, multiple co-morbidities, higher risk, etc.) and/or therapeutic decision-making warrant such use.

Download COVID-19: Nutraceutical and Botanical Recommendations for Patients

Recommended Interventions

QUERCETIN

Quercetin has been shown to have antiviral effects against both RNA (e.g., influenza and coronavirus) and DNA viruses (e.g., herpesvirus). Quercetin has a pleiotropic role as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory, modulating signaling pathways that are associated with post-transcriptional modulators affecting post-viral healing.[8]

Intervention Quercetin
Suggested dose Regular: 1 gm po bid; phytosome 500 mg bid
Mechanism(s) of action against non-COVID-19 viruses Promote viral eradication or inactivation:[9],[10],[11],[12],[13]
•Inhibition of viral replication
Favorably modulate viral-induced pathological cellular processes:
•Modulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation[5],[14],[15]
Mechanistically promote resolution of collateral damage and restoration of function:
•Modulation of mast cell stabilization (anti-fibrotic)
Outcomes data supporting their mitigating Reduction of symptoms
Strength of evidence Moderate
Risk of harm:[16],[17] Minimal

CURCUMIN

Curcumin has been shown to modulate the NLRP3 inflammasome,5 and a preprint suggests that curcumin can target the SARS-CoV-2 main protease to reduce viral replication.18

Intervention Curcumin
Suggested dose 500-1,000 mg po bid (of absorption-enhanced curcumin)
Mechanism(s) of action against non-COVID-19 viruses Favorably modulate viral-induced pathological cellular processes:
•Modulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation[5],[19],[20],[21]
Outcomes data supporting their mitigating effects on illness from other viral strains No data available No data available
Strength of evidence Conditional
Risk of harm:[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27] Minimal

EPIGALLOCATECHIN GALLATE (EGCG)

Green tea, in addition to modulating the NLRP3 inflammasome and, based on a preprint, potentially targeting the SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro)7 to reduce viral replication, has also been shown to prevent influenza in healthcare workers.28

Intervention Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)
Suggested dose 4 cups daily or 225 mg po qd
Mechanism(s) of action against non-COVID-19 viruses Favorably modulate viral-induced pathological cellular processes:
•Modulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation[5],[28],[29]
Outcomes data supporting their mitigating effects on illness from other viral strains No data available
Strength of evidence Conditional
Risk of harm:[30],[31],[32],[33],[34],[35] Significant (rare) – Hepatotoxicity

N-ACETYLCYSTEINE (NAC)

N-acetylcysteine promotes glutathione production, which has been shown to be protective in rodents infected with influenza. In a little-noticed six-month controlled clinical study enrolling 262 primarily elderly subjects, those receiving 600 mg NAC twice daily, as opposed to those receiving placebo, experienced significantly fewer influenza-like episodes and days of bed confinement.[36]

Intervention N-acetylcysteine (NAC)
Suggested dose 600-900 mg po bid
Mechanism(s) of action against non-COVID-19 viruses:[36] Favorably modulate cellular defense and repair mechanisms:
•Hypothetical: repletion of glutathione and cysteine
Outcomes data supporting their mitigating effects on illness from other viral strains Reduce progression from colonization to illness
Reduce the severity and duration of acute symptoms
Strength of evidence Limited
Risk of harm:[37],[38],[39],[40],[41] Minimal

RESVERATROL

Resveratrol, a naturally occurring polyphenol, shows many beneficial health effects. It has been shown to modulate the NLRP3 inflammasome.[5] In addition, resveratrol was shown to have in vitro activity against MERS-CoV.[43]

Intervention Resveratrol
Suggested dose 100-150 mg po qd
Mechanism(s) of action against non-COVID-19 viruses Favorably modulate viral-induced pathological cellular processes
•Modulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation[5]
Outcomes data supporting their mitigating effects on illness from other viral strains MERS-CoV[43]
Influenza[44],[45]
Strength of evidence Conditional
Risk of harm:[46],[47],[48],[49],[50],[51],[52],[53] Minimal

VITAMIN D

Activated vitamin D,1,25(OH) D, a steroid hormone, is an immune system modulator that reduces the expression of inflammatory cytokines and increases macrophage function. Vitamin D also stimulates the expression of potent antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), which exist in neutrophils, monocytes, natural killer cells, and epithelial cells of the respiratory tract.[54] Vitamin D increases anti-pathogen peptides through defensins and has a dual effect due to suppressing superinfection. Evidence suggests vitamin D supplementation may prevent upper respiratory infections.[55] However, there is some controversy as to whether it should be used and the laboratory value that should be achieved. Research suggests that concerns about vitamin D (increased IL-1beta in cell culture) are not seen clinically. The guidance we suggest is that a laboratory range of >50 and < 80ng/mL serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D may help to mitigate morbidity from COVID-19 infection.

Intervention Vitamin D
Suggested dose 5,000 IU po qd in the absence of serum levels
Mechanism(s) of action against non-COVID-19 viruses[55],[56],[57],[58],[59],[60],[61],[62],[63],[64],[65],[66],[67],[68],[69],[70],[71],[72],[73],[74],[75],[76],[77],[78] Favorably modulate cellular defense and repair mechanisms:
•Activation of macrophages
•Stimulation of anti-microbial peptides
•Modulation of defensins
•Modulation of TH17 cells
Favorably modulate viral-induced pathological cellular processes:
•Reduction in cytokine expression
•Modulation of TGF beta
Outcomes data supporting their mitigating effects on illness from other viral strains Reduce progression from colonization to illness Reduce the severity and duration of acute symptoms and complications
Strength of evidence Limited
Risk of harm:[79],[80],[81],[82] Minimal

MELATONIN

Melatonin has been shown to have an inhibitory effect on the NLRP3 inflammasome.[94] This has not gone unnoticed by the COVID-19 research community, with two recent published papers proposing the use of melatonin as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of patients with COVID-19.[84],[85]

Intervention Melatonin
Suggested dose 5-20 mg qd
Mechanism(s) of action against non-COVID-19 viruses .[83],[84] Favorably modulate viral-induced pathological cellular processes
• Modulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation .[83],[84]
Outcomes data supporting their mitigating effects on illness from other viral strains Research in progress
Strength of evidence Conditional
Risk of harm:[86],[87],[88],[89],[90],[91],[92],[93],[94] Minimal

VITAMIN A

Vitamin A is a micronutrient that is crucial for maintaining vision, promoting growth and development, and protecting epithelium and mucus integrity in the body. Vitamin A is known as an anti-inflammation vitamin because of its critical role in enhancing immune function. Vitamin A is involved in the development of the immune system and plays regulatory roles in cellular immune responses and humoral immune processes through the modulation of T helper cells, sIgA, and cytokine production. Vitamin A has demonstrated a therapeutic effect in the treatment of various infectious diseases.[95]

Intervention Vitamin A
Suggested dose Up to 10,000-25,000 IU/d
Mechanism(s) of action against non-COVID-19 viruses [95],[96] Favorably modulate cellular defense and repair mechanisms:
• Modulation of T helper cells
• Modulation of sIgA
Favorably modulate viral-induced pathological cellular processes:
• Modulation of cytokine production
Outcomes data supporting their mitigating effects on illness from other viral strains No data available
Strength of evidence Conditional
Risk of harm:[97],[98],[99],[100],[101],[102] Minimal if does not exceed this dose; caution: pregnancy

ELDERBERRY

Elderberry (Sambucus nigra) is seen in many medicinal preparations and has widespread historical use as an anti-viral herb.[103] Based on animal research, elderberry is likely most effective in the prevention of and early infection with respiratory viruses.[104] One in-vitro study reported an increase in TNF-alpha levels related to a specific commercial preparation of elderberry[105] leading some to caution that its use could initiate a “cytokine storm.” However, these data were not confirmed when the same group performed similar studies, which were published in 2002.[106]Therefore, these data suggest it is highly implausible that consumption of properly prepared elderberry products (from berries or flowers) would contribute to an adverse outcome related to overproduction of cytokines or lead to an adverse response in someone infected with COVID-19.

Intervention Elderberry
Suggested Dose 500 mg po qd (of USP standard of 17% anthocyanosides)
Mechanism(s) of action against non-COVID-19 viruses[103],[107],[108],[109],[110],[111],[112] Favorably modulate cellular defense and repair mechanisms
Favorably modulate viral-induced pathological cellular processes
Outcomes data supporting their mitigating effects on illness from other viral strains No data available
Strength of evidence Strong
Risk of harm:[103],[107],[113],[114] Minimal; caution with autoimmune disease; uncooked/unripe plant parts toxic; USDA GRAS

PALMITOYLETHANOLAMIDE (PEA)

PEA is a naturally occurring anti-inflammatory palmitic acid derivative that interfaces with the endocannabinoid system. There was a significantly favorable outcome in five of six double blind placebo-controlled trials looking at acute respiratory disease due to influenza.[115] Dosing was generally 600 mg three times daily for up to three weeks. There are multiple mechanisms of action associated with PEA, from inhibition of TNF-alpha and NF-kB to mast cell stabilization. In influenza, it is thought that PEA works by attenuating the potentially fatal cytokine storm.

Intervention Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA)
Suggested dose 300 mg po bid to prevent infection, 600 mg po tid x two weeks to treat infection
 Mechanism(s) of action against non-COVID-19 viruses[115] Favorably modulate cellular defense and repair mechanisms
Favorably modulate viral-induced pathological cellular processes
Outcomes data supporting their mitigating effects on illness from other viral strains No data available
Strength of evidence PEA = conditional (treatment)
PEA = strong (prevention)
Risk of harm:[116],[117],[118],[119] Minimal

VITAMIN C

Vitamin C contributes to immune defense by supporting various cellular functions of both the innate and adaptive immune system. Vitamin C accumulates in phagocytic cells, such as neutrophils, and can enhance chemotaxis, phagocytosis, generation of reactive oxygen species, and ultimately microbial killing. Supplementation with vitamin C appears to be able to both prevent and treat respiratory and systemic infections.[120] Vitamin C has been used in hospital ICUs to treat COVID-19 infection.

Intervention Vitamin C
Suggested dose 1-3 grams po qd
Mechanism(s) of action against non-COVID-19 viruses[120] Favorably modulate cellular defense and repair mechanisms
Favorably modulate viral-induced pathological cellular processes
Outcomes data supporting their mitigating effects on illness from other viral strains No data available
Strength of evidence Strong
Risk of harm[121] Minimal

ZINC

Zinc contributes to immune defense by supporting various cellular functions of both the innate and adaptive immune system. There is also evidence that it suppresses viral attachment and replication. Zinc deficiency is common, especially in those populations most at risk for severe COVID-19 infections, and it is challenging to accurately diagnosis with laboratory measures. Supplementation with zinc is supported by evidence that it both prevents viral infections and reduces their severity and duration. Moreover, it has been shown to reduce the risk of lower respiratory infection, which may be of particular significance in the context of COVID-19.

Intervention Zinc
Suggested dose 30–60 mg daily, in divided doses
Zinc acetate, citrate, picolinate, or glycinate orally
Zinc gluconate as lozenge
Mechanism(s) of action against non-COVID-19 viruses120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127 Favorably modulate innate and adaptive immune system
Favorably modulate viral-induced pathological cellular processes, attachment, and replication
Outcomes data supporting their mitigating effects on illness from other viral strains Prevention, reduced severity of symptoms, reduced duration of illness, prevention of lower respiratory tract infection
Strength of evidence Strong
Risk of harm128 Minimal

Evaluative Criteria

In the recommendations above, the following criteria are used to identify strength of evidence and risk of harm.

Strength of Evidence Risk of Harm
Strength of EvidenceConditionalClinical experience and/or expert opinion and/or conflicting studies; biological mechanism at least partly explained. Risk of HarmMinimalRisk of self-limited symptoms; no risk of loss of function or corrective intervention anticipated; observation only.
Strength of EvidenceLimitedOne study showing correlation between intervention and outcome; compelling ATMs and/or PCFs; biological mechanism at least partly explained. Risk of HarmMildRisk of symptoms; no risk of loss of function or quality of life; minor evaluative and/or therapeutic intervention needed.
Strength of EvidenceModerateTwo independent studies (one of which is LOE = 1 or 2) showing correlation between intervention and outcome; biological mechanism at least partly explained. Risk of HarmSignificantRisk of temporary loss of function or quality of life; significant evaluative and/or therapeutic intervention needed.
Strength of EvidenceStrongTwo independent studies (both LOE = 1 or 2) showing correlation between intervention and outcome; biological mechanism fully explained or partly explained and having one additional correlative study. Risk of HarmSevereRisk of permanent symptoms, loss of function, quality of life, or death; long-term evaluative and/or therapeutic intervention needed.

*This resource is only intended to identify nutraceutical and botanical agents that may boost your immune system. It is not meant to recommend any treatments, nor have any of these been proven effective against COVID-19. None of these practices are intended to be used in lieu of other recommended treatments. Always consult your physician or healthcare provider prior to initiation. For up-to-date information on COVID-19, please consult the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at www.cdc.gov.

SPECIAL THANKS
We would like to thank the IFM COVID-19 Task Force, members of the IFM staff, and consultants working with IFM for their contributions to this article.

________________________

**Comment**

There is also a live presentation with Joel Evans, MD, and Robert Rountree, MD, with moderator Patrick Hanaway, MD, whom answer attendee questions. Download Slides Here  (Click on initial link for video)

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/14/potential-interventions-for-novel-coronavirus-in-china-a-systematic-review/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/05/azithromycin-hydroxychoroquine-accelerate-recovery-of-outpatients-with-mild-moderate-covid-19/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/22/new-study-hcq-zinc-greatly-reduces-covid-19-health-risk/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/08/natural-supplements-vs-coronaviruses/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/15/herbal-treatment-for-coronavirus-infections-buhner/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/20/herbal-treatment-for-covid-19-addendum-buhner/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/06/a-plausible-penny-costing-effective-treatment-for-corona-virus-ozone-therapy/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/07/covid-19-integrative-support-in-prevention-early-interventions/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/12/convalescent-plasma-therapy-tested-on-critically-ill-covid-19-patients/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/02/28/coronavirus-how-bad-can-it-get-includes-treatments-disulfiram-is-one/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/02/13/washington-doctors-successfully-treat-coronavirus/

 

Potential Interventions for Novel Coronavirus in China: A Systematic Review

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jmv.25707  Full Paper Here

Potential interventions for novel coronavirus in China: A systematic review

Lei Zhang | Yunhui Liu

Department of Neurosurgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China

Correspondence:  Yunhui Liu, Department of Neurosurgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street, Heping, Shenyang, 110004 Liaoning, China.

Email: liuyh@sj-hospital.org

Funding information:  Project of Key Laboratory of Neurooncology in Liaoning Province, China,
Grant/Award Number: 112‐2400017005

Abstract

An outbreak of a novel coronavirus (COVID‐19 or 2019‐CoV) infection has posed significant threats to international health and the economy. In the absence of treatment for this virus, there is an urgent need to find alternative methods to control the spread of disease. Here, we have conducted an online search for all treatment options related to coronavirus infections as well as some RNA‐virus in- fection and we have found that general treatments, coronavirus‐specific treatments, and antiviral treatments should be useful in fighting COVID‐19. We suggest that the nutritional status of each infected patient should be evaluated before the administration of general treatments and the current children’s RNA‐virus vaccines including influenza vaccine should be immunized for uninfected people and health care workers. In addition, convalescent plasma should be given to COVID‐19 patients if it is available. In conclusion, we suggest that all the potential interventions be implemented to control the emerging COVID‐19 if the infection is uncontrollable.

___________________

**Comment**

This abstract is brief and doesn’t do the paper justice.  Please see the full paper in the link as the authors literally go through vitamins, minerals, Chinese medicine, various inhibitors, anti-virals, chloroquine, and much more.  This is a great resource.  I also appreciate the fact they state the patient’s nutritional status should be evaluated.  Very few scientific studies mention such an important aspect of health.

It’s important to note that the flu vaccine increases coronavirus infection by 36%nothing to sniff at:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/23/flu-vaccine-increases-coronavirus-infection-risk-36/

The flu vaccine has many serious side-effects and fails most of the time:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/07/10/cdc-admits-flu-vaccine-failed-91-of-the-time-against-current-flu-strain/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2015/11/08/flu-vaccine-causes-the-flu/

Cochrane founder also warns that flu vaccine research is corrupted: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/02/26/cochrane-founder-warns-flu-vaccine-research-is-corrupted/