Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

Stakeholder Capitalism – Episode 1

http://

  Approx. 1 hour 35 min

Stakeholder Capitalism

Full Feature Documentary

Stakeholder Capitalism is an investigative documentary about our transition, away from free-market capitalism, to a global political system called Stakeholder Capitalism.  Former TV producer and tech entrepreneur, Richard Jeffs, discovers what Stakeholder Capitalism is and how its Inclusive and Sustainable policies are changing our society. Richard also investigates how the ESG corporate credit score forces us to adopt Stakeholder Capitalism.

Conveniently ahead of November elections, an update on DOD Directive 5240.01 supplanting the 2016 version, now includes military provisions authorizing lethal force on U.S. soil in certain circumstances when assisting civilian law enforcement.  While the directive forbids assassination, it opens the door to lethal interventions under “national security” conditions. According to RFK Jr. it is now legal for the U.S. military to shoot and kill Americans who engage in political protests because they disagree with policies in the White House.

These changes are significant.  

Go here to listen (Scroll to 27:00) to Attorney Todd Callender explain how whistleblowers have shown him internal government documents in an attempt to frighten FEMA employees. In short, the current government is creating a ‘predicate offense,’ or catalyst to be able to enforce this new directive by attempting to pit civilians against government.  FEMA employees have been instructed to be obstructionist and have parked helicopters on an active runway and commandeered privately owned buildings and have kicked out occupants.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see how this directive can and will be abused.

All of this is important to everyone to understand.  It explains the global collusion of tyranny, censorship, surveillance, and takeover of science, medicine, the media, and virtually every aspect of life.

Lyme/MSIDS patients already have the deck stacked against them.  This will only make things infinitely worse.

Interview with Richard Jeffs, the investigative film maker who created the film here:

http://

The World’s Major Problems Due to ‘Stakeholder Capitalism’

Educate others and spread the word.

Paper on Successful HCQ Use for COVID

https://drlf.substack.com/p/new-paper-the-use-of-hydroxychloroquine?

New paper: The use of hydroxychloroquine in multidrug protocols for SARS-CoV-2

I am pleased to announce that we have recently published a comment paper in the Tasman Medical Journal in response to an editorial review by the journal’s Editor-In-Chief concerning  the use of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19. Despite expressing disagreement with the editorial, the Editor has been genuinely interested in publishing a robust academic debate. His handling of our manuscript was very professional and meticulous.

The study concisely reviews previously published work, so there are no new major results presented. However, the importance of this study is that it provides a very concise statement of what should have been widely known and understood, by now, about pandemic response and specifically about the Raoult and Zelenko hydroxychloroquine-based multidrug protocols.

Some of the key points that we make are as follows:

  1. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) require large sample sizes to ensure sufficient randomization.  RCTs with insufficient randomization cannot claim superiority over retrospective observational controlled studies.
  2. There was sufficient evidence to justify the continuation of hydroxychloroquine-based multidrug treatments on an emergency basis by the end of April 2020, contrary to the claims of French regulators, currently preoccupied with persecuting Dr. Didier Raoult.
  3. By December 2020, the evidence was sufficiently strong that there was no longer equipoise to ethically justify any randomized controlled trials against placebo. The crossover point for the failure of equipoise, based on Zelenko’s data, was during June 2020.

We concluded the study with the following observations:

It is our interpretation that hydroxychloroquine played an important role in preventing hospitalizations and deaths due to COVID-19, particularly in 2020 with the more virulent strains. Widespread use of nasal sprays and gargles, aspirin, vitamin D, ivermectin, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, molnupiravir, favipiravir, colchicine, corticosteroids, and anticoagulants in protocols all contributed to the benefits of early treatment which were widely favored over therapeutic nihilism in the pre-hospital phase. In case of a future pandemic, involving a novel disease, doctors should be encouraged to attempt treatments with repurposed medications based on biological plausibility, signals of benefit, and acceptable safety.  Article 37 of the 2013 Helsinki declaration allows the use of unproven treatments if “proven interventions do not exist or other known interventions have been ineffective” and the unproven treatment “offers hope of saving life, reestablishing health or alleviating suffering”. When these efforts result in case series of treated patients that show a large magnitude of benefit, then statistical comparison with historical controls can be used to support the strength of association between treatment and improved outcomes.  As evidence accumulates, the Bradford Hill criteria framework can be used to assess the support for a causality claim, as an inference to the best explanation. This evidence can be gathered rapidly and form the basis for an agile emergency response to future pandemics, if public health is willing to leverage the clinical experience of medical doctors at the front lines.

(See link for article and references)

_______________

**Comment**

Anyone dissing ivermectin, HCQ, vitamin D, nasal sprays & gargles, vitamin C, and other immune supports for respiratory illnesses and pushing an ineffective but dangerously toxic mRNA gene therapy has their head in the sand and is beyond reason.

Don’t listen to them.

First Swedish Studies Expose 5G Symptoms

https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/the-first-5g-studies-have-emerged?

The first 5G studies have emerged from Sweden exposing symptoms linked to 5G radiation

What will control this rampant industry?

Dr. Tess Lawrie

A recent scientific article published in Reviews on Environmental Health reviews seven small-scale studies on microwave syndrome associated with the rollout of 5G.

Despite many scientists raising concerns about the potential negative impacts of fifth generation (5G) technology on health, governments and industry have ignored calls for a moratorium on 5G deployment.

Prior to the accelerated rollout of 5G technology in 2020 (under cover of the Covid lockdowns) very little research had been conducted on the biological effects of exposure to 5G radiofrequency (RF) radiation and no long-term health studies were available. A few animal studies, however, revealed negative effects on the liver, kidneys, brain, muscles, bones and plasma after exposure to 5G frequencies around 3.5 GHz.

Mobile phone carrier waves operate within the microwave frequency range. Since the 1960s, we have known that microwave radiation is harmful to health, with symptoms of ‘microwave syndrome’ including difficulties sleeping, headaches, fatigue, irritability, concentration problems, loss of short-term memory, emotional distress, depression, anxiety, unusual touch-based sensations including burning skin, cardiovascular symptoms, shortness of breath, and muscle- and joint pain.

In Sweden, since the rollout of 5G, seven small case studies were conducted that tracked the health impacts of high RF radiation on 16 people living or working close to 5G base stations or towers (within 3 to 538 metres). These individuals, who ranged in age from four to 83 years, started experiencing symptoms characteristic of microwave syndrome shortly after the activation of 5G. In most cases, their symptoms waned or disappeared after they moved away from the source. In the studies, each person rated, on a scale of zero to ten, their experience of 41 different health issues associated with microwave syndrome.

______________

**Comment**

In a recent post ‘Vaccines’ & Harmful Intent it was stated that the COVID ‘plandemic’ was the excuse used to inject billions with a mysterious cocktail of untested and unproven  nanotechnology.  I would argue the same can be said for 5G, AI, Wifi, 3D, digital ID, and smart meter rollout, all of which have not been proven to be safe, and in fact have been connected to a wide range of disease in all biological life forms.

For more:

‘Vaccines’ & Harmful Intent

The ineffective yet deadly gene therapy COVID clot shots with at least 55 undeclared chemical elements, including several toxins, have and continue to maim and kill.

In fact, there have been up to 15 MILLION deaths and 60 MILLION disabilities globally.
Further, ALL recombinant vaccines and adjuvants are now implicated in the DNA scandal.

The researchers who recently discovered the undeclared elements have deduced:

“The clues seem to be pointing to some kind of worldwide technological experimentation.” (brief 5 min video by independent journalist Greg Reese which explains)

While the COVID ‘plandemic’ was the excuse used to inject billions with a mysterious cocktail of untested and unproven nanotechnology, the silver lining appears to be that people are beginning to wake up from the nightmare. 

Now, due to deaths increasing 7-fold, a town in Western Australia supports a ban on mRNA products and is calling on the Australian government to implement a ban, and the Slovak government is calling for a ban of ‘dangerous’ mRNA ‘vaccines.’  Source

Mod-RNA technology, what it should be called, has exposed three-quarters of humanity to an unacceptable risk,” Plothe said. “Unfortunately, this risk has now materialized into around 20 million deaths and uncounted numbers of cardiological, immunological, neurological and oncogenic ‘side effects.’” ~ Christof Plothe, D.O. and member of the World Council for Health‘s steering committee

Every government leader worldwide should be banning these products.
Now a government report admits AIDS is surging among the COVID vaxxed.

Pfizer originally claimed a 95% efficiency for their vaccine which may have been true immediately after ‘vaccination,’ however, not only do they lose efficacy over time down to ZERO, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficacy is reached.

But the human experiment is far, far older than COVID.  Dr. Richard Fleming has recently penned Are We the Next Endangered Species and highlights the fact eugenics has long been a part of a globalist scheme.  This plan has included sterilization, bioweapons, and vaccines. Many state COVID shots are all three.

Graphs from The Dissolving Illusions graphical website, which is so threatening to the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex it has been hacked several times and redirects to a Chinese firm, show reductions in disease and mortality due to improved sanitation, living conditions, etc BEFORE the introduction of vaccination.

Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova states that while we’re told that “vaccines” work by giving us a small amount of a toxic substance, allowing us to create immunity against future infections, it’s been known since 1913 that what the injections actually do is make us vulnerable to said toxins. Furthermore, “vaccines” prime our bodies to react badly to *anything* that’s injected into us, including benign substances like milk or egg proteins. Hence the proliferation of allergies, such as allergies to milk, eggs, wheat, peanuts, etc.

“It’s impossible to vaccinate for anything. And Richet has demonstrated it conclusively and was given Nobel Prize for it…because he figured out how to poison everyone by sensitizing them to the most commonly occurring things in their environment.” “It’s the most ingenious way of poisoning,” ~ Sasha Latypova 

Thousands of mRNA manufacturing plants are slated to be built on every continent with the ability to produce billions of doses of gene-manipulation material.  The mRNA products which hijack the body’s machinery continue to roll out despite any logic, science, or truth.  The reason for this goes back to 2012 when the DOD ADEPT PROTECT P3 program which stated the US will use mRNA vaccines to end pandemics in 60 days.

Well, how’s that going?

It’s not, but that won’t stop the plan from continuing.

If you are new to the ‘vaccine’ debate, start here.  Then go here, and here. Learn that doctors get financial kick-backs for peddling them, despite the fact they receive very little ‘vaccine’ education – approximately enough to understand the package inserts.  Then, go on to learn that corrupt public health ‘authorities’ have patents on many vaccines and have been mislabeling ‘vaccination’ deaths for 50 years.  Infants that die after ‘vaccination’ are labeled SIDS as there is no ICD code for a ‘vax’ death

SIDS continues to be the leading cause of death among infants.

_______________

https://hillmd.substack.com/p/harmful-intent-for-vaccines-a-review?

Harmful Intent For Vaccines: A Review

Covid and 9/11 made people further suspect they’re being lied to about childhood injections (Updated 10/16/24)

An October 2024 Substack article entitled Here are The True Intentions Behind Vaccinations! posits reasons vaccines are strongly coerced and mandated in developed nations without full informed consent, placebo-controlled safety testing, or manufacturer liability.

These reasons might relate to the absurd demand you obtain a religious exemption to avoid potentially deadly shots. (See link for article, crucial short video about vaccines from Dr. McCullough, and six studies showing unvaccinated children are healthier than vaccinated ones.)

Also, watch this McCullough interview with Dr. Ken Stoller who has written the recent book Incurable Us Why the Best Medical Research Does Not Make it into Clinical Practice. In his book, Stoller also explains how to treat some of the most worrisome diseases and conditions afflicting humans today—including Lyme disease, brain trauma, dementia, and autism.  (See link for article)

_____________

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1821639041336651899?t=NCaOuzkczbiCgS4IHOhTKg&s=19

‘Vaccine’ Schedule A 100-Year Bluff

“[The ‘vaccine’ schedule] has been a one-hundred-year bluff...The head of the Nigerian vaccine program says, ‘I need to know if I put this cocktail of vaccines in one little body…the cocktail is safe and effective.’ [But they had] nothing. The whole thing is an empty hand.” Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the) Catherine Austin Fitts describes on a recent episode of the @ChildrensHD series Financial Rebellion how the entire “vaccine” schedule is based on a “one-hundred-year bluff.”

Fitts notes in the clip [in above link] that when Heidi Larson, an anthropologist from London, was tasked with figuring out what was behind so-called “vaccine hesitancy,” she found that “the families and the family physicians want[ed] scientific proof that vaccines are safe and effective, and there [was] none.” Furthermore, Fitts notes that there are no studies supporting the safety and efficacy of giving multiple “vaccines” to a child simultaneously, at one time. (See link for video)

https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/no-placebo-101823.pdf

Vaccine chart shows:  Not a single routine childhood vaccine was licensed based on a long-term placebo-controlled trial. Not one. 

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-report-childhood-vaccines-saved-million-lives-outdated-statistics/

‘Laughable’: Experts Rip CDC Report Claiming Childhood Vaccines Saved 1.1 Million Lives

Experts interviewed by The Defender said the CDC relied on outdated disease and mortality statistics that led to “laughable” conclusions and ignored the real costs of adverse effects of vaccination.

 
“The methods are shoddy, the data are untethered from reality and the conclusions are a preposterous fiction,” Toby Rogers, Ph.D., a fellow at the Brownstone Institute for Social and Economic Research, told The Defender. “This study is an advertisement on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry and it should be treated as such.”

“None of the vaccines available through the Vaccines for Children Program are as effective as the CDC claims,” Rogers said. “We know that the mumps portion of MMR does not work. The pertussis portion of DTaP does not stop infection nor transmission of pertussis. That’s true for lots of vaccines on the schedule.”

Rogers said it is well-documented in books like “Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History,” by Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk, that there were 90% to 100% reductions across all childhood infectious diseases before the introduction of mass vaccination campaigns.

The CDC report came out one day after Gallup released a poll finding fewer Americans today consider childhood vaccines to be important, with only 40% saying it is extremely important for parents to have their children vaccinated, down from 58% in 2019 and 64% in 2001.

The poll also found that only a slim majority — 51% — of Americans think the government ought to mandate vaccines.

https://rumble.com/v53i62f-childhood-vax-schedule-is-continuation-of-genocide.html  Video Here

The childhood vaccination schedule, pushed by CDC and pediatricians is a continuation of the mass genocide operation and should be dismantled. FOUR shots begin BEFORE BIRTH and total 200 by age 18, many repeated with NO SCIENTIFIC justificationDr. Jane Ruby is an American scientist, medical professional, and commentator. You can follow her Substack at https://su

________________

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-all-vaccines-cause-harm?

Why Do All Vaccines Cause Harm?

An explanation of the zeta potential concept

Story at a Glance:

  • Vaccines often cause various side effects, making it hard to identify common causes. Neurologist Andrew Moulden discovered that vaccines frequently trigger microstrokes, which can lead to a myriad of acute and chronic diseases.
  • Forgotten research from the 1960s, shows that blood cell clumping is a root cause of many diseases—a belief also shared by Chinese Medicine.
  • Colloidal chemistry and zeta potential science reveal that positive charges around blood cells cause clumping. Agents with concentrated positive charges, such as aluminum and the COVID spike protein, are especially problematic.
  • Improving the physiologic zeta potential benefits a wide range of acute and chronic illnesses. A strong case can be made that many conventional and holistic therapies work in part by enhancing zeta potential.

Note: this is an abridged version of an article I previously published here. Since I receive many questions on this topic and readers wanted an concise version of it, I worked to distill it down to its key points so this topic could easily be shared with others.  (See link for article)

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/what-is-vaccine-ideology-where-did?  Video here  (Fast forward to 12:15 to hear the history of ‘vaccine’ ideology)

What is Vaccine Ideology? Where Did it Come From?

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

RSV is a very mild infection in about half of kids under age one.  We are seeing an ‘explosion’ in cases because they are now testing for it.  Now they are pushing vaccines to women in their 3rd trimester for the first time ever to theoretically pass antibodies onto their babies.  The entire ‘problem’ has been fabricated.

We discuss the origins of vaccine ideology and cite the work by Roman Bystrianyk and Dr. Suzanne Humphries, Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History which is a historical accounting of the development of vaccines and how early versions of products had serious safety and efficacy issues. Instead of pausing, investigation, and improvement, with each new vaccine including smallpox, polio, measles, etc, there was an authoritarian posture taken by the public health agencies and medical establishment that everyone had to take a shot and vaccine serious adverse events and deaths were incurred and considered as part of delivering the public good. Essentially vaccine ideology in medicine is like a set of religious beliefs taken on faith, not on evidence. (See link for article and video)

________________

https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/thinking-of-taking-a-flu-shot-read?

Thinking of taking a flu shot? Read this first…

It’s not just that they’re ineffective, they also cause harm. Learn about safe alternatives such as Vitamin D, quercetin and zinc.

If you’re of a certain age or demographic and in the northern hemisphere, chances are you’re being invited or encouraged to get a flu vaccine. The claim is that flu vaccines protect you and others from coming down with flu – and that if you do get it, the symptoms will be mild. So, is this true?

Many scientists see the flu shot as an unnecessary measure. For one thing, there’s a big question over whether the flu vaccine even works, particularly for older people, for whom it is recommended. Studies show that the vaccines often do not match the circulating viruses and no significant effects on serious complications or hospitalizations have been demonstrated.

You’d think that vaccinating people against flu would lead to a reduction in deaths from flu. But figures show that this isn’t the case. In fact, even though the number of flu shots given has increased more than eightfold, the number of flu-associated deaths has remained more or less unchanged.  (See link for article)

Important excerpt:

  • In 2020, Anderson et al. showed that influenza vaccination of 60 to 70 year olds in England and Wales had no discernible positive impact on hospitalization or deaths:

  • Another study in Japan reported on 83,146 individuals aged 65 years and followed them up over six years. In 2023, the incidence of hospitalization for influenza did not differ significantly by vaccination and the claimed protective effectiveness against incidence waned quickly after four or five months.

  • Another 2020 study from Anderson and team analysed data covering 170 million episodes of care and 7.6 million deaths. Turning 65 was associated with a statistically and clinically significant increase in rate of seasonal influenza vaccination. However, no evidence indicated that vaccination reduced hospitalizations or mortality among elderly persons. The study points out that estimates were precise enough to rule out results from many previous studies.

  • Controlled studies published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) find that people who receive flu shots emit 630% more flu virus particles into the air compared to non-vaccinated people. In other words, flu vaccines spread the flu!

The FDA just halted the Novavax trial of the combo COVID-Flu ‘vaccine’ citing patient with nerve damage.  Of course Novavax denies, denies, denies it all.  Dr. Meryl Nass told The Defender there have been other recent drug trials in which participants suffered serious adverse events similar to the one reported by Novavax today — yet the trials were allowed to continue, and the drugs were approved.

For example, in the adult RSV trials for Pfizer’s Abrysvo, two participants were diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome. In GSK’s Arexvy vaccine trial, there was one reported case of Guillain-Barré and one death, both of which the FDA found to be potentially linked to the vaccine

Novavax will just have to pay a wad of money to have the FDA reverse their decision.

For more:  

 
 
 
 

AAP, ADA Rush to Support Fluoridation Despite Cochrane Review and the Fact it Lowers IQ

https://townsendletter.com/federal-hypocrisy-is-poisoning-americans-with-toxic-chemicals/

Federal Hypocrisy is Poisoning Americans with Toxic Chemicals

by  | Oct 15, 2024

Progressive Radio Network, July 5, 2024

For decades, we have been told a lie, a lie that has led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans and the weakening of the immune systems of tens of millions more. This lie is called fluoridation. A process we were led to believe was a safe and effective method of protecting teeth from decay is in fact a fraud. For decades it’s been shown that fluoridation is neither essential for good health nor protective of teeth. What it does is poison the body. Therefore we should all be asking how and why public health policy and the American media continue to perpetuate this scientific sham. Despite the growing consensus in the medical literature about fluoride’s dangers and decades of denial within the federal health establishment to take any notable action, this is not the case for another class of pervasive toxic substances commonly known as “forever chemicals.” (See link for article which delves into PFAS)

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/lobbyists-pediatricians-dentists-support-water-fluoridation/

Lobbyists for Pediatricians and Dentists Dig in on Water Fluoridation

The CDC hasn’t issued a statement since last month’s ruling that fluoridation at current U.S. levels poses an “unreasonable risk” of reduced IQ in children. However, the agency, which historically supported fluoridation, changed its website to indicate it now wants to shift responsibility to towns, cities and voters.

u.s. capitol building, money and word "fluoride"

The Association of American Pediatricians (AAP), the American Dental Association (ADA) and other pro-fluoridation groups rushed to confirm their staunch support for community water fluoridation after a California federal judge last month ruled that fluoridation at current U.S. levels poses an “unreasonable risk” of reduced IQ in children.

U.S. District Judge Edward Chen also ruled that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) needs to enact a regulation that will eliminate the risk.

The EPA’s only official response so far to last month’s ruling is that the agency is reviewing the decision. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which has long promoted water fluoridation, has not issued any statement.

The ADA said it “remains staunchly in support of community water fluoridation at optimal levels to help prevent tooth decay.” It said the court ruling, “provides no scientific basis for the ADA to change its endorsement of community water fluoridation as safe and beneficial to oral health.”

However, Chen’s 80-page ruling summarizes and evaluates the extensive scientific data. The data include a key report researched and compiled over six years by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ National Toxicology Program (NTP), along with gold-standard epidemiological studies from the U.S.MexicoCanada and Europe by top hazardous substances researchers.

Although the ruling did not specify the exact level at which fluoridation causes brain damage, the levels in U.S. water present an unreasonable risk, Chen found.

The decision didn’t sway the AAP. “There is nothing about the current decision that changes my confidence in the safety of optimally fluoridated water in the U.S.,” said Dr. Charlotte W. Lewis, a member of the AAP Section on Oral Health.  (See link for article)

______________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cochrane-review-water-fluoridation-minimal-effect-dental-health/

Breaking: New Cochrane Review Finds Water Fluoridation Has Minimal Effect on Dental Health

Adding fluoride to drinking water provides very limited dental benefits, according to an updated Cochrane Review published today. The review follows a California federal court ruling that fluoridation poses an “unreasonable risk” of reduced IQ in children.

two kids drinking water and word "fluoride"

Adding fluoride to drinking water provides very limited dental benefits, especially compared with 50 years ago, according to an updated Cochrane Review published today.

The review follows less than two weeks after a California federal judge ruled water fluoridation poses an “unreasonable risk” of reduced IQ in children and must be regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

It also comes as some U.S. cities and towns have moved to pause or stop fluoridating their water in response to the verdict, signaling that fluoridating water, a long-term and largely unquestioned practice in the U.S., is facing heightened scrutiny.

To determine if water fluoridation leads to reduced rates of tooth decay, researchers from the University of Manchester and other U.K. universities reviewed 157 studies comparing communities that fluoridated their water to those that don’t.

They concluded that contemporary evidence shows community water fluoridation may lead to a very small reduction in cavities in children’s baby teeth over time. Fluoride in water reduced tooth decay only by about one-quarter of one tooth, they found, and even that conclusion was made with “low certainty.”

Important excerpts:

They said studies conducted in 1975 or before showed a larger benefit of water fluoridation on tooth decay, CNN reported — a reduction of about one less cavity in baby teeth. However, those findings no longer apply to populations today who have better baseline dental health and exposure to other sources of fluoride, like toothpaste, they said.

The findings also confirm recent observational studies, including the LOTUS Study, which found only a 2% reduction in cavities among people living in fluoridated areas in England.

Yet, over 200 million Americans are currently exposed to IQ lowering fluoridated water on a daily basis.

According to this, water fluoridation is up to local communities and nobody has to wait upon the EPA, which may take years to act upon the judge’s order.  The U.S. is an “outlier,” as only 24 other countries fluoridate their water.

“The U.S. fluoridates as many people as the rest of the world put together,” ~ Rick North, Fluoride Action Network board member

All of this is reminiscent of experts still supporting the COVID shots despite the fact they don’t work and have maimed and killed people!