Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

‘The Proof is in the Pudding” My Letter to the TBDWG

tickbornedisease@hhs.gov

They say, The proof is in the pudding.

My husband and I, and thousands of others have regained our health due to extended antibiotic treatment.

My name is Alicia Cashman and I run the Madison Lyme Support Group in Wisconsin.

Our dog became infected first, then my husband, then me. While our dog was put on a month’s worth of antibiotics (which is more than the CDC recommends for people) my husband and I languished, undiagnosed and untreated for years. Formerly an avid runner, my husband was reduced to playing Candy Crush on the couch in his robe. He wouldn’t admit there was a problem until he fell down the stairs. Meanwhile, I ignored my gynecological symptoms until they metastasized systemically, as he appeared far worse.  

Trying to find answers to our spiraling health, I explained our multiple migrating & relapsing symptoms to my kids’ coach, who said,

“This sounds like a page out of my book. I was just diagnosed with Lyme disease.”

This new information sent me on a quest that has never ended.

In my experience, this is how people finally get answers to their perplexing health deterioration: from other experienced patients. Due to the ignorance of mainstream medicine which follows antiquated and biased science which relies heavily on abysmal testing that misses over 70% of cases, and in this case 86%, where patients rarely test positive, and if they do manage to ‘win the lotto’ with a positive, they are told it’s a false positive.  A local woman called me yesterday with this exact scenario testing positive THREE times, but was told it was a false positive and was sent packing.

It’s a damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation where patients continue to lose.

The ugly history behind testing is something from a science fiction novel, only it’s very real.  There’s been a concerted effort to suppress direct diagnostic tests, and questions go unheeded.  There’s currently a $58.1 million lawsuit against the CDC for using its regulatory power to block application of a highly reliable direct DNA test and for channeling public funds to promote their own patented tests.

We are forced to seek help where we can find it due to this unscientific dogma which borders on the absurd.

Even though the history of tick-borne illness dates back to the 1800’s, working knowledge remains infantile, and having just read Polly Murray’s work, The Widening Circle, very little has changed in over 40 years. The issue of persistent infection continues on unabated, yet continues to be experienced by patients worldwide.

Due to our lives and health dissolving in front of our very eyes, we in Lyme-land learn quickly if we want to get our health back we need to go outside mainstream medicine which continues in this endless juggernaut due to the severe conflicts of interest of our public ‘authorities’, whom have rigged the diagnostic test for their own patent purposes and continue to control a narrative keeping people from proper diagnosis and treatment – which includes what is being taught in medical schools.

These are simple verifiable facts.  

We also suffer due to mainstream medicine’s simplistic germ theory that doesn’t match our symptom picture at all; mainly that we are typically infected with far more than just borrelia, the causative agent of Lyme disease.  Garg et al. not only show the polymicrobial (multiple pathogens) nature of the disease(s) but the fact borrelia is pleomorphic (shape-shifts); facts the chronic Lyme deniers continue to ignore.

These two issues are at the crux of understanding of Lyme/MSIDS – or multi systemic infectious disease syndrome. 

Further, mythology abounds:

  • We are are told nearly 80% get the “classic” bullseye rash, when it is highly variable and not “classic” at all.  This is problematic not only from a diagnostic stand point but because having the EM rash is often entrance criteria into research studies. By utilizing this criteria, as well as only accepting positive 2-tiered serology, studies are omitting a huge subset of patients – probably the sickest ones.
  • We are told that only 10-20% go onto develop symptoms after treatment, when it’s more like 40-60% when you count those that were diagnosed and treated late (nearly everyone I deal with).
  • We are continually told things are “rare,” only to have information quietly updated later.
  • We are continually told Lyme/MSIDS can’t be in certain locations only to be told later it exists after denying thousands treatment.
  • Southern patients have been fighting for decades to be properly diagnosed and treated but have been ruled by Andrew Speilman’s Iron Curtain.
  • Researchers continue to use the popular “climate change” moniker in their work, eating up precious research dollars, when independent research has proven tick proliferation to be caused by migrating birds and photo-period.  Ticks laugh at the weather. Rather than answering the very real question of the bioweaponization of ticks being dropped from airplanes, public ‘authorities’ continue a slight of hand by pushing the climate agenda.
  • We continue to be told Lyme/MSIDS can’t be spread sexually when research and experience indicates it can be. We were told it didn’t occur congenitally, yet much research and experience shows otherwise.

Wisconsin has a long history of tick-borne illness with many experienced doctors. Dr. Waisbren, an IDSA founder and Wisconsin physician, disagreed with his colleagues and successfully used high dose IV antibiotics for those with chronic Lyme disease.

“I have to come to the conclusion that there is an epidemic of chronic Lyme disease occurring in the United States that warrants more attention than it is getting from the government and the academic medical establishment. It is hard for me to believe that 51 cases of what I call the chronic Lyme disease syndrome represent a figment of my imagination….I suggest that those who doubt that the Lyme disease syndrome exists and that it can be treated turn to the over 200 peer-reviewed references included in summary articles written by two giants in the Lyme disease field: Dr. B.A. Fallon and Dr. Steven Phillips.”  Dr. Waisbren

If Waisbren thought chronic Lyme disease was an epidemic in 2011, what would he think now?

And what about those peer reviewed references showing chronic infection? Why are they continually ignored?  Here’s over 700.

And some newer ones.

The reason chronic Lyme/MSIDS is the crucial issue to be addressed is because there are thousands upon thousands that continue with severe symptoms after the outdated and unscientific CDC mono-therapy.

Biased, poorly done research on this issue states that further treatment doesn’t help yet my husband, myself, and countless others prove that axiom to be completely wrong.

Thankfully, ILADS trained doctors despite being persecuted, listen to patients, defy the accepted narrative, and are willing to treat longer and with numerous antimicrobials to address the often present coinfections. After-all, relapses have occurred in nearly every single antibiotic study ever done.

Treatment for this complex illness takes a savvy nuanced approach. My husband and I are living proof that a judicious use of antibiotics is not only effective but safe if done correctly.  Antibiotics are only part of a multi-pronged approach in treating this beast.  I suggest you listen to the thousands of ILADS trained doctors and other professionals rather than vilifying them.

I often shutter when I consider what would have happened had we remained under a doctor adhering the CDC guidelines which mainstream medicine follows as a literal mandate. We very well might be dead as we both had heart involvement.

Research for Lyme/MSIDS has only progressed by being independently done.

Lastly, I would like to include some quotes:

“The presence of live spirochetes in a genital lesion strongly suggests that sexual transmission of Lyme disease occurs,” said Middelveen. “We need to do more research to determine the risk of sexual transmission of this syphilis-like organism.”  Marianne Middelveen, PhD

“I AM CONVINCED THAT LYME DISEASE IS TRANSMITTABLE FROM PERSON TO PERSON.”  Lida Mattman PhD

“We never had in the last five years a single MS patient, a single ALS patient, a single parkinson’s patient, who did not test positive for Borrelia burgdorferi.  Not a single one.  Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt

“The CDC is responsible for the current Lyme disease crisis where patients cannot obtain a timely diagnosis through accurate early detection.” Lyme patient and advocate Carl Tuttle

“The people who test positive are ironically the ones who really aren’t sick other than a bad knee (Lyme arthritis). This is how after the Dearborne conference, where the case definition was fraudulently changed to a very narrow set of criteria that lyme came to be associated with arthritis, namely an arthritic knee, when in reality that is the very least of the symptoms most lyme patients encounter.

I liken the two tiered testing for lyme to giving a blind person a vision test then telling them they can see – it’s madness!”  Malia McClean

The ongoing and prolific conflicts of interest impede our public ‘authorities’ from making wise public health decisions.  The fact that only ONE patient representative is on the TBDWG succinctly proves my point.

Prove me wrong.

URGENT: Submit Comments to TBDWG on Chronic Lyme TODAY By 11:59 p.m. ET

GLA_1C_Logo_CMYK

According to HHS staff, the Tick-Borne Disease Working Group (TBDWG) is scheduled to discuss and vote on a chronic designation for the 2020 report to the HHS Secretary and Congress at the upcoming meeting on November 17, 2020.

 It is critical that we, as advocates in support of a chronic designation, provide written comments to the TBDWG as it prepares to vote on this critical matter. Your written comments will not only provide scientific evidence of the chronic impact of Lyme disease, but also allow for you to share your personal story.  

Make Your Voice Count

 It is important that your comments reflect the need for a chronic designation by the TBDWG. Listed below are a few key talking points that can be included in your written comments that advocate for a vote in favor of the designation:

  • People are sick. And, they deserve better. The stigma, doctor ignorance and public shaming that surrounds this disease needs to be rectified.
  • A chronic-Lyme designation would ensure that countless Americans are provided proper diagnosis and treatment of this disease. 
  • We are seeking access to accurate testing, insurance coverage for this disease, employers recognizing that this is real. 
  • We ask the TBDWG recognize and recommend a chronic designation of Lyme disease. 

Comments can be submitted via this link or by directly sending to tickbornedisease@hhs.gov. It is important that your comments reflect the need for a chronic designation by the TBDWG. 

Guidelines to submit either a written or public comment as required by the  HHS below:

1. To submit a written public comment:

  • Submit an email to tickbornedisease@hhs.gov
  • Use the email subject line: Written Public Comment – November 17
  • Deadline: All written comments must be received by 11:59 p.m., ET, Friday, November 6
  • Provide your preferred identification: Tell us how you prefer to be identified with your comment. We cannot post your comment without this information. You may choose one or more of the following options:
    • Use your name
    • Be listed as anonymous
    • Include your city and/or state
    • Provide comments on behalf of an organization (please include the organization’s full name)

2. Writing your public comment:

  • Format: Comments must be in the body of your email or in an attached Word document.
  • Page Limit: Comments must not exceed four (4) pages in Calibri or Times New Roman, 11 point font (text that exceeds four pages will be deleted).
  • Graphics: Do not include graphics, images, text boxes, or tables. If included, they will not be retained.
  • Links: Hyperlinks will only be added for “.gov” sites (local, state, or federal). For all other reference sites, please insert the full URL (e.g., http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/epigenetics).
  • Attachments: Do not include any attachments. We are also unable to include attachments as supporting documentation to written comments.

Next steps: Your written comment will be posted to the HHS TBDWG website  before the meeting. If you have any questions or concerns about submitting your comment, contact tickbornedisease@hhs.gov. 

Global Lyme Alliance thanks you in advance for your willingness to submit a written comment to the TBDWG in support of this important initiative. 

______________________

For more:

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/25/why-should-we-care-about-lyme-disease-a-colorful-tale-of-government-conflicts-of-interest-probable-bioweaponization-and-pathogen-complexity/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/21/patients-speak-up-at-tbdwg-meeting-you-must-address-persistent-infection-and-chronic-lyme-disease-doctors-are-clueless/

 

 

Danish Newspaper Reveals Largest Study on Masks Has Been Rejected By 3 Medical Journals

To understand how biased medical journals have become, please read this important article and learn that medical journals and 86% of clinical trials are funded by Big Pharma, turning journal articles into little more than marketing machines.  The COVID debacle clearly showed this in action.  Independent research, or those defying the narrative simply could either not get their work published or it was retracted.

https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-danish-newspaper-reveals-largest-study-masks-rejected

Horowitz: Danish newspaper reveals largest study on masks has been rejected by 3 medical journals

‘The study and its size are unique in the world,’ one study author told the paper

By Daniel Horowitz

October 22, 2020

Why not just conduct a randomized controlled trial to test whether masks work against COVID-19? Why assume such a draconian and dehumanizing mandate works as if it’s an article of faith and create such division when we can discover which side is correct? That’s what a group of Danish researchers felt, which is why, over the spring, they conducted such a study. So why have the results not been published, three months later? According to one Danish newspaper, the study has been rejected by three medical journals because the results are too controversial.

______________________

**Comment**

Important excerpts:

The article reveals that, thus far, the study has been rejected by the Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine, and the American Medical Association’s journal JAMA, three of the publications that have been posting much of the research on coronavirus.

The CDC, prior to changing its position on universal mask-wearing, had previously cited 10 randomized controlled trials that showed “no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks.” 

The phobia among the political elites against subjecting mask-wearing mandates to the scientific method is not surprising. In July, Dr. Fauci told a group of Georgetown University students that he has no intention of conducting a controlled study in the U.S.

Yet this same Fauci has no trouble peddling his expensive antiviral Remdesivir, of which he:

  • sponsored the clinical trial for, and obtained EUA status before being peer-reviewed
  • still has not made public his financial relations with Gilead, the manufacturer 
  • instead of using science, he made the promotional announcement sitting on a couch in the White House, without allowing for review of the data.
  • at the time he also failed to disclose to the public that the primary outcomes of the study were changed, which the AHRF considers “dubious and suspicious”, of which the mainstream media ignored, but should raise serious red flags  
  • shrugged off a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center peer-reviewed, published Chinese study that was stopped due to serious adverse events  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/30/anthony-fauci-40-years-of-lies-from-azt-to-remdesivir/
Are we really surprised when science comes out defying the accepted narrative?  

These same people have been getting away with murder for over 40 years:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/26/cdc-playbook-learning-from-lyme/

I recently posted on how medical journals are bought out: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/05/top-medical-journal-caught-in-massive-cover-up/ (See comment section as well)

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/12/former-french-health-minister-blows-whistle-criminal-pressure-from-bigpharma-on-publications-means-theres-no-longer-any-real-science/

5G Fund For Rural America Hands Over U.S. Farms to Big Tech, Critics Say

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/5g-fund-agriculture-big-tech-fcc/

11/04/20 

5G Fund for Rural America Hands Over U.S. Farms to Big Tech, Critics Say

FCC’s new fund includes money for precision agriculture that opponents say is more about commodification and control of information than better farming.

By Jeremy Loffredo 

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) last week established the 5G Fund for Rural America. The fund will hand over billions of dollars worth of taxpayer money to the world’s largest telecom providers. In exchange, the telecom giants will build 5G infrastructure in rural regions of the U.S. — including the infrastructure needed for 5G or wireless farming, also known as “precision agriculture.”

Precision agriculture involves the use of sensors in fields to measure moisture and temperature levels, satellites and drones that provide remote real-time images of crops, and even wireless sensors attached to cattle that monitor their health and track their location.

Proponents of precision agriculture see it as a path towards increased profitability, sustainability and the ability for farmers to determine the exact optimal amount of water, fertilizers or pesticides.

But critics say it’s simply a “marriage between agribusiness and spy technology.” (See link for article)

_____________________

**Comment**

Important Excerpt:

Global Research, in its report, “5G Agriculture – Food from Frankenstein Farming,” described “5G food” as a “GMO look-alike” and concluded that 5G agriculture “is just one more toxic scam within the egregious global roll-out of 5G — and its attempt to monitor, control and irradiate all that lives, breathes and has the expectation of a life worth living.”

“In our lawsuit against the FCC, we cite thousands of studies showing that the FCC’s position is contrary to the clear scientific and human evidence and fails to protect public health.”

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/06/evidence-of-5g-health-effects-mounts/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/07/01/protect-our-health-environment-from-5g-calamity-eht-submitted-science-on-the-health-effects-of-5g-on-human-body/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/25/coronavirus-science-policy-politics-5g/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/03/13/despite-lack-of-studies-safety-standards-relaxed-ahead-of-5g-emf-health-effects-survey-shows-health-harm-rat-study-shows-microwaves-cause-brain-permeability/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/03/childrens-health-defense-principal-brief-in-landmark-case-against-fcc-on-5g-and-wireless-harms-submitted/

Nine COVID Facts: A Pandemic of Fearmongering & Ignorance

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2020/october/28/nine-covid-facts-a-pandemic-of-fearmongering-and-ignorance/

Nine Covid Facts: A Pandemic of Fearmongering and Ignorance

undefinedEver since the alleged pandemic erupted this past March the mainstream media has spewed a non-stop stream of misinformation that appears to be laser focused on generating maximum fear among the citizenry. But the facts and the science simply don’t support the grave picture painted of a deadly virus sweeping the land.Yes we do have a pandemic, but it’ a pandemic of ginned up pseudo-science masquerading as unbiased fact. Here are nine facts backed up with data, in many cases from the CDC itself that paints a very different picture from the fear and dread being relentlessly drummed into the brains of unsuspecting citizens.

1) The PCR test is practically useless

According to an article in the New York Times August 29th 2020 testing for the Covid-19 virus using the popular PCR method results in up to 90% of those tested showing positive results that are grossly misleading.

Officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada compiled testing data that revealed the PCR test can NOT determine the amount of virus in a sample. (viral load) The amount of virus in up to 90% of positive results turned out to be so miniscule that the patient was asymptomatic and posed no threat to others. So the positive Covid-19 tests are virtually meaningless.

2) A positive test is NOT a CASE

For some reason every positive Covid-19 test is immediately designated a CASE. As we saw in #1 above up to 90% of positive Covid-19 tests result in miniscule amounts of virus that do not sicken the subject. Historically only patients who demonstrated actual symptoms of an illness were considered a case. Publishing positive test results as “CASES” is grossly misleading and needlessly alarming.

3) The Centers for Disease Control dramatically lowered the Covid-19 Death Count

On August 30th the CDC released new data that showed only 6% of the deaths previously attributed to Covid-19 were due exclusively to the virus. The vast majority, 94%, may have had exposure to Covid-19 but also had preexisting illnesses like heart disease, obesity, hypertension, cancer and various respiratory illnesses. While they died with Covid-19 they did NOT die exclusively from Covid-19.

4) CDC reports Covid-19 Survival Rate over 99% 

The CDC updated their “Current Best Estimate” for Covid-19 survival on September 10th showing that over 99% of people exposed to the virus survived. Another way to say this is that less than 1% of the exposures are potentially life threatening. According to the CDC the vast majority of deaths attributed to Covid-19 were concentrated in the population over age 70, close to normal life expectancy.

5) CDC reveals 85% of Positive Covid cases wore face masks Always or Often 

In September of 2020 the CDC released the results of a study conducted in July where they discovered that 85% of the positive Covid test subjects reported wearing a cloth face mask always or often for two weeks prior to testing positive. The majority, 71% of the test subjects reported always wearing a cloth face mask and 14% reported often wearing a cloth face mask. The only rational conclusion from this study is that cloth face masks offer little if any protection from Covid-19 infection.

6) There are inexpensive, proven therapies for Covid-19

Harvey Risch, MD, PhD heads the Yale University School of Epidemiology. He authored “The Key to Defeating Covid-19 Already Exists. We Need to Start Using It”which was published in Newsweek Magazine July 23rd, 2020. Dr. Risch documents the proven effectiveness of treating patients diagnosed with Covid-19 using a combination of Hydroxychloroquine, an antibiotic like azithromycin and the nutritional supplement zinc. Medical Doctors across the globe have reported very positive results using this protocol particularly for early stage Covid patients.

7) The US Death Rate is NOT spiking

If Covid-19 was the lethal killer it’s made out to be one would reasonably expect to see a significant spike in the number of deaths reported. But that hasn’t happened. According to the CDC as of early May 2020 the total number of deaths in the US was 944,251 from January 1 – April 30th. This is actually slightly lower than the number of deaths during the same period in 2017 when 946,067 total deaths were reported.

8) Most Covid-19 Deaths Occur at the End of a normal Lifespan

According to the CDC as of 2017 US males can expect a normal lifespan of 76.1 years and females 81.1 years. A little over 80% of the suspected Covid-19 deaths have occurred in people over age 65. According to a June 28th New York Post article almost half of all Covid suspected deaths have occurred in Nursing Homes which predominately house people with preexisting health conditions and close to or past their normal life expectancy.

9) CDC Data Shows Minimal Covid Risk to Children and Young Adults

The CDC reported in their September 10th update that it’s estimated Infection Mortality Rate (IFR) for children age 0-19 was so low that 99.97% of those infected with the virus survived. For 20-49 year-olds the survival rate was almost as good at 99.98%. Even those 70 years-old and older had a survival rate of 94.6%. To put this in perspective the CDC data suggest that a child or young adult up to age 19 has a greater chance of death from some type of accident than they do from Covid-19.

Taken together it should be obvious that Covid-19 is pretty similar to typical flu viruses that sicken some people annually. The vast majority are able to successfully fight off the virus with their body’s natural immune system. Common sense precautions should be taken, particularly by those over age 65 that suffer from preexisting medical conditions.

The gross over reaction by government leaders to this illness is causing much more distress, physical, emotional and financial, than the virus ever could on its own. The bottom line is there is NO pandemic, just a typical flu season that has been wildly blown out of proportion by 24/7 media propaganda and enabled by the masses paralyzed by irrational fear.

State and local governments in particular have ignored the rights of the people and have instituted outrageous attacks on freedom and liberty that was bought and paid for by the blood and sacrifice of our forefathers.

Slowly the people are recognizing the great fraud perpetrated on them by bureaucrats and elected officials who have sworn to uphold rights and freedoms as spelled out in the US Constitution. The time has come to hold these criminals accountable by utilizing the legal system to bring them to justice.

Either we act now to preserve freedom and liberty for our children and future generations yet unborn, or we meekly submit to tyrants who crave more power and control. I will not comply!


Copyright © 2020 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.
Please donate to the Ron Paul Institute

com/2020/07/10/coronavirus-why-everyone-was-wrong/  Beda M Stadler is the former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, a biologist and professor emeritus.

Excerpt:

  1. Firstly, it was wrong to claim that this virus was novel.
  2. Secondly, It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus.
  3. Thirdly, it was the crowning of stupidity to claim that someone could have Covid-19 without any symptoms at all or even to pass the disease along without showing any symptoms whatsoever.