Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

2 Minutes of Truth on COVID Shots – Dr. Zelenko & Steve Kirsch

https://rumble.com/vy8swt-premeditated-mass-murder-evidence-suggests-the-fda-and-pfizer-were-aware-of  Video Here (Approx. 2  Min)

“Premeditated Mass Murder” Evidence Suggests FDA & Pfizer Completely Aware of What Would Happen

Dr. Zelenko presents leaked FDA information on mRNA shots.

The FDA had a leaked internal presentation detailing severe side effects two months prior to “vaccine” rollout and Pfizer’s data correlates with the FDA’s.

“There’s a term for this: when there’s 100% correlation. What, the FDA has prophetic powers? So let me tell you what it is: it’s first-degree premeditated mass murder, crimes against humanity, and genocide.” ~ Dr. Zelenko

COVID shots are linked to:

https://mobile.twitter.com/lakovosjustice/status/1507554765106028550  Video Here (Approx. 2 Min)

Steve Kirsch Speaks at U.S. Senate Hearing

U.S. Senate expert witness testimony states that there are 410,000 unexplained deaths in Americans. Insurance company data shows 40% increase in deaths of people under 64. This is the greatest killer of mankind. This is the worse coverup in human history.

For more:

The correlation to the COVID-19 shots now is irrefutable, just from using the U.S. Government’s own data from the CDC, and also from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Growing Evidence of Lyme-Like Illness in Australia

Growing Evidence of an Emerging Tick-borne Disease That Causes a Lyme-like Illness For Many Australia Patients

Professor Noel. Campbell
Fellow Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine

sub1281_Campbell (1)  372 page Paper Here

Executive Summary:  

Over the past three decades, thousands of Australian families have felt the impact of Lyme and  other tick-borne diseases (TBDs), with an estimated 10,000 individuals affected each year. Whether  it is a laborer who cannot continue his work because of debilitating joint pain, or a child who  misses school because of debilitating fatigue, pain and cognitive dysfunction, TBDs can have a  significant effect on the day to day lives of Australians. Since Lyme disease was first identified in  Australia in 1982, the disease has spread geographically, and in severity. It has been documented  that there has been an increase in tickborne diseases in Australia, including early and late forms, as  well as an increase in neurological cases.

The patient experience may be characterized by delays in diagnosis, confusion, frustration,  ongoing illness, with, in many cases poor outcomes, disability and a significant financial burden.  (Most recently, we have started to record deaths in Australia from tickborne diseases.)

Recognizing these facts, the Parliament of Australia has referred these matters to the Senate  Community Affairs References committee for enquiry and report. The Senate acknowledged the significant toll TBDs may exact on individuals, families, communities, and the state, noting that  TBDs pose a serious threat to the health and quality of life of many residents and visitors to  Australia.

The purpose of this inquiry should be to establish a Lyme and related tickborne diseases task force charged with exploring and identifying recommendations related to education and awareness, long term effects of misdiagnosis, prevention, and surveillance. The intent of the recommendations are  generally to improve Australia’s response to the tickborne disease burden.

This submission reflects the history of TBDs in Australia, and includes specific recommendations as well as implementation strategies, case studies, and resource needs. While the Senate Inquiry  will be the result of months of research and co-collaboration, it is clear that its report is merely the  beginning of a much-needed dialogue and structured planning process across the country.

The primary recommendations in this submission focus on increased and improve surveillance,  prevention of tick exposure strategies and tactics, as well as education and awareness for  healthcare practitioners(HCPs), patients, the general public and other stakeholders.

In contemplating each recommendation, the author carefully considered each of the countries key  stakeholders, including patients of all ages and their families, vulnerable populations, health care  providers, domestic animals, researchers, Government agencies, policy makers, schools and  community organisations, and the general public.

Key Themes: 

  1. Tickborne disease knowledge and research is evolving rapidly. It will be vital to encourage  critical research, to understand the scope and scale of Lyme and other TBDs in Australia,  and to develop options to improve the public health response and the community/ patient  outcomes.
  2. Different schools of thought exist among all stakeholders regarding Lyme. Ambiguities do  exist so it is important to promote a strong and academically rigourous pursuit of better  research to help clarify the best options for patients. We are encouraged to keep an open  mind, and to continue to explore the nature of these diseases and their health impacts.
  3. The most critical research gap is the lack of a gold standard test for Lyme and other  tickborne infections; a test that can quickly and accurately diagnose the disease, and prove  or disprove ongoing persistence. Research into bio- resonance for diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease is producing encouraging results in Melbourne Australia.
  1. Without more research and surveillance, it will be difficult to stay ahead of this rapidly  evolving public health problem.
  2. The cost to Australia of doing nothing is considerable.
  3. Without targeted and significant funding, it is unlikely these recommendations can be  deployed in an effective and impactful way.
  4. Collaboration among the commonwealth’s diverse stakeholders Will help ensure programs  and strategies are innovative, effective, and measurable.  Too many Australians have suffered the consequences of Lyme and TBD’s, and without action,  thousands more remain at risk. This is important public health challenge affects all Australians  -every state has reported ticks infected with bacteria. And yet our children, our elderly, and our immunocompromised are most at risk and most vulnerable to their impact. Our actions now,  will significantly impact Australian youth’s risk and future potential.The author respectfully requests Swift action on the enclose recommendations by all state  leaders charged with ensuring the protection and well being of the Commonwealth’s residents.

_________________

For more:

Category:

Activism, Lyme, research, Testing, Ticks

Screenwriter Turns a Couple’s Courageous Lyme Fight into a Film Script

https://www.lymedisease.org/doherty-courageous-lyme-fight/

Screenwriter turns a couple’s courageous Lyme fight into a film script

By Steve Doherty

March 15, 2022

I was bitten on the neck by a tick in 1996, while camping in southern Mississippi. But I didn’t notice or remove the tick until five days after I returned home.

Looking back, I now recognize the subtle symptoms in the years following, such as hand rashes, crackling in my neck and mild cardiac arrhythmias.

In 2010, I became very ill. I spent a year and a half visiting physicians with no definitive diagnosis.

The symptoms had intensified to include numbness in my hands and feet, increased cardiac arrhythmias, consistent tinnitus and severe fatigue. Finally, an ILADS-affiliated doctor diagnosed me with Lyme in 2012.

I had worked as a respiratory therapy for 39 years, but could do so no longer due to my symptoms. I retired and began to delve into another love, screenwriting.

The Lasiter Family

Through a number of incredible circumstances, I became acquainted with Jessica and Lance Lasiter. Jessica is 30 years old and suffers highly debilitating symptoms. She became ill in 2010 and like me, experienced misdiagnosis and questioning of her symptoms.

At one point, doctors told her she had ALS. But eventually, she discovered she had neurological Lyme. Jessica is presently wheelchair-bound with very little use of her hands and much difficulty speaking.

Writing with one functional finger

Jessica and Lance are a courageous couple. Jessica, in her determination to help others, has even written the manuscript for a book based on her journey, using her one functional finger, on her cell phone. She transfers her work to her laptop, which she operates with a foot mouse.

Getting to know Jessica and Lance motivated me to write a screenplay based on their journey. Jessica, Lance and I met on a weekly basis for two years in order that I could learn their story, with its many ups and downs.

Their story was recently chronicled in The Clarion Herald, a local New Orleans newspaper. Here is a link to that article.

We now have a completed script, synopsis and log line for the project. We feel that it is a story that will truly encourage others, as well as inform many regarding the seriousness and horror of Lyme disease. The story is also one of Jessica’s courage and determination to help others in the face of severe adversity. The film project is currently titled, “The Cub & The Raider.”

We expect Jessica’s book manuscript, “We’ve Only Just Begun,” to be ready for publication soon.

During my work with Jessica and Lance, I have witnessed a devotion of a couple to each other that one rarely sees. They love each other unconditionally. This inspires me to use my situation and understanding of Lyme to put forth this story. By virtue of this I am determined, more than ever, in spite of the continued symptoms that I experience, to press on to completion. I hope it will help many people cope with their own Lyme disease challenges.

Steve Doherty lives in Metrairie, Louisiana. For more information regarding the book and film projects, he can be contacted at brownpelican08@aol.com.

Category:

Activism, Lyme

5 Ways DOD’s Recalibrated Health Surveillance Data Looks Like a Fraudulent Attempt to Cover COVID Shot Injuries

https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-5-ways-dods-recalibrated-health-surveillance-data-looks-like-a-fraudulent-attempt-to-cover-vaccine-injury?

Horowitz: 5 ways DOD’s recalibrated health surveillance data looks like a fraudulent attempt to cover vaccine injury

Op-ed

Daniel Horowitz

March 24, 2022

For the past two months, and possibly even earlier, the Defense Health Agency’s Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division has been systematically changing the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) health surveillance data for active-duty soldiers without any transparency. Where are the congressional inquiries?

On Jan. 24, attorney Thomas Renz brought three named military doctors as whistleblowers to Sen. Ron Johnson, and many more who submitted private affidavits, attesting to the fact that DMED showed a massive increase in numerous diagnosis codes ranging from cancers, blood disorders, and heart ailments to strokes, nervous system disorders, and reproductive issues. They attested in sworn statements that the increase in the data reflected their clinical experience in the military over the past year and is, in their professional opinion, the result primarily of mass vaccine injury from the COVID shots.

In a bizarre twist, the military went on to change the data in the ensuing days without ever conducting a formal investigation into what went wrong or releasing a statement to the public. Rather, a week later, in a terse statement to PolitiFact, of all places, officials claimed the high numbers for 2021 were indeed correct, but that there was a glitch in the data for 2016-2020 used by the whistleblowers to establish a baseline, rendering those years way too low.

A four-page document the DOD submitted in Navy SEAL 1 vs. Austin to Florida federal Judge Douglas Merryday provided more information. In that document, officials make it clear that the 2021 numbers were accurate, that the glitch for 2016-2020 only presented itself from September 2021 through the end of January 2022, following a “server migration” last August, that the new data was corrected on Jan. 29, 2022, that DMED was restored the following day, and that by Feb. 2, they had recreated the proper data. That document is extremely terse, alleges no formal investigation, contains no letterhead, and is completely unsigned.

Yet numerous data points suggest that the government is lying about this narrative. Indeed, data was changed numerous times, 2021 data in some instances was slid backwards, and other data points demonstrate that the current data is corrupt. (See link for article)

__________________

**Comment**

Yet another instance of data being manipulated in an under-handed way to fit an accepted narrative.

Yet, Biden is seeking $22.5 BILLION for ‘Boosters for All’ despite lack of efficacy, safety concerns, data manipulation, and other serious issues.

The article is thorough and utilizes graphs showing DMED “fixes” before and after for the following conditions:

  1. Pericarditis – the “fixed” data are implausible because baseline is far too high as well as that there was absolutely zero increase either from COVID or the shots, which has already been proven.  Further, a whistleblower pulled data prior to 2016 and found the data matches the baseline found by whistleblowers and makes the “fixed” version out of sync with history.
  2. Myocarditis – again, rewinding to the previous 10-year baseline shows the “unfixed” version is closer to the original untampered-with data.  Interestingly the “glitches” only shadow the points the whistleblowers make at the time they make it.  Further, number slid backwards and they changed the numbers multiple times during the same month which contradicts four assertions in the court document that they didn’t know about the glitch until Renz’s testimony and that changes were ALL fixed at once in Jan.
  3. Infertility – Renz presented data that was pulled earlier in January by the military doctors showing a 472% increase in female infertility diagnoses in 2021.  When the DHA “fixed” the data, they massively increased the numbers for the previous five years, but they changed it at least three times! Whistleblowers found when they pulled the data before the Johnson hearing, that it had been tampered with several times.  The congressional report is from a year prior to their glitch data, so that data, according to their own narrative, should be correct and would corroborate the numbers from the whistleblowers.
  4. 38% increase in strokes – even after DHA changed most of the data, this STILL shows a 38% increase over the five-year average. Again, government workers changed the data numerous times before they allegedly knew about the glitch.  Whistleblowers, on condition of anonymity, attested to dealing with an unusual number of young, healthy stroke victims who suffered recent strokes, aneurysms, and other neurological damage.  The military has not investigated this.
  5. Exponential increase in “vaccine” injury diagnoses codes –  even after all the DHA data changes, three ICD codes for various types of “vaccine” injury still show anywhere from a 6-17 fold increase in 2021 over the previous 5 years, which harmonizes very well with the VAERS data that show a 10-fold increase in reported deaths and hospitalizations from the shots, except the DMED data are actually from military doctors who identified vaccines as a possible cause of melody.

It is clear that the government’s current data appears to be fraudulent and based on what we already know from VAERS, excess mortality rates, and insurance data around the world, there clearly is a degree of vaccine injury that is not being reported. The totality of the DMED data still shows these concerns in many categories. At the same time, the data is now completely sabotaged. The concern of vaccine injury and a damaged health surveillance system are vital to national security and are equally as problematic. Yet, our government wants us to believe that the first problem doesn’t exist and the second problem was instantly fixed. Clearly, there is more to the story.

For more: 

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Two Doctors Correct IDSA

https://www.lymedisease.org/repeating-information-idsa/

TOUCHED BY LYME: Repeating incorrect information doesn’t cause it to become correct

In November 2021, a commentary promoting the Infectious Diseases Society of America’s newly updated Lyme disease guidelines was published in the American Journal of Medicine.

(Unfortunately, those new guidelines have made it even harder for Lyme patients to get properly diagnosed and treated than the previous ones from 2006.)

This month, the AJM published two letters from ILADS-affiliated doctors who are pushing back against the IDSA.

One is from Dr. Betty Maloney, a co-author of the ILADS guidelines and a member of the current federal Tick-Borne Disease Working Group. She takes IDSA authors to task for recommending 10 days of doxycycline for a Lyme-related rash.

Inadequately sourced, potentially dangerous

“If the primary treatment goal for managing patients with erythema migrans (EM) rashes is to restore patients to their pre-Lyme health status, then the guidelines endorsed by Auwaerter et al are both inadequately sourced and potentially dangerous,” Dr. Maloney writes.

She notes that of the two trials cited in support of that advice, only one applies to patients in the United States. And in that study, almost half of the subjects failed to complete the 30-month trial.

Results at the 12-month observation point, she points out, suggest that “this regimen is not highly effective and puts many at risk for post-treatment sequalae that adversely impact quality of life.”

She says that the other study, conducted in Europe, is not generalizable to US patients, due to differences between the US and European Lyme-inducing Borrelia species.

According to Dr. Maloney, the IDSA authors ignored other studies showing a high clinical failure rate of the 10-day treatment. She concludes by saying:

“It is challenging to provide evidence-based medical care when there is little or no high-quality evidence to rely on. It is harder still when influential authors promote inadequate guidelines without meaningfully disclosing their shortcomings. Clinicians and their patients deserve better.”

Read Dr. Maloney’s full letter here.

Erroneous statement about single-dose doxy

A second letter, from Dr. Bea Szantyr, focuses on the IDSA’s recommendation to give a single dose of doxycycline after a tick bite.

“Repeating incorrect information does not cause it to become correct,” Dr. Szantyr writes.  “The erroneous statement by Auwaerter et al, that taking single-dose doxycycline after an Ixodes tick bite prevents Lyme disease, has not been demonstrated by any North American study to date.

“Although repeatedly cited as demonstrating this, the 2001 Nadelman study did not follow its subjects long enough to demonstrate this point. It is well known that later manifestations of Lyme disease may develop beyond the 6-week follow-up period used by the investigators.”

Dr. Szantyr proposes that it would be more valid to say that the optimum dosage and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing Lyme disease after an Ixodes tick bite remains unknown.

Read Dr. Szantyr’s full letter here.

In some quarters—including those of government health officials, many practitioners, and most insurance companies—the IDSA Lyme guidelines are viewed as truth handed down from the mountaintop.

When those guidelines keep repeating such false—or incomplete—information, Lyme patients suffer.

Bravo to Drs. Maloney and Szantyr for calling the IDSA authors on their errors. We need more of this.

TOUCHED BY LYME is written by Dorothy Kupcha Leland, LymeDisease.org’s Vice-president and Director of Communications. She is co-author of When Your Child Has Lyme Disease: A Parent’s Survival Guide. Contact her at dleland@lymedisease.org.

Category:

Activism, Lyme, research