Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

Experts Don’t Understand What Vaccines Are Doing But 68% of Parents Eagerly Await Lyme Vaccine

https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/2024/02/29/68-parents-eagerly-await-lyme-disease-vaccines

68% of Parents Eagerly Await Lyme Disease Vaccines

February 29, 2024
by Alfonso Cerezo
(Precision Vaccinations News)

Article Excerpts:

Announced on February 28, 2024, this survey found addressing safety concerns important, and a healthcare provider recommendation could also encourage those unsure or unwilling to be vaccinated.

Initially developed by Valneva SE, the VLA15 Lyme disease vaccine candidate development program was granted Fast Track designation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2017.  (See link for article)

For more:

_______________

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/vaccinologists-do-not-entirely-understand

Vaccinologists Do Not Entirely Understand What Vaccines Are Doing: A Closer Look at Non-Specific Effects, Especially Population-Level Adverse Events

Co-administration of vaccines and the order in which vaccines are given may result in population-level adverse events.

Article Excerpts:

Vaccines are lauded as monumental achievements including the prevention of myriad deadly diseases. Yet, a full command of the available research shows that the impact of vaccines transcends their primary preventive roles, challenging the foundational understanding held by vaccinologists. The evidence is strong that vaccine-induced non-specific effects (NSEs), which we will rechristen “population-level adverse events (PLAEs)”, to enhance a full comprehension of immunization-related non-specific events.

WHO’s Response and Inaction

The World Health Organization (WHO) has recognized the potential importance of NSEs, establishing a working group to review the evidence. Despite this, nearly a decade has passed without significant action to address the concerns raised by these findings. The delay highlights a gap in our understanding and application of vaccine science.

The global health community must remain open to reevaluating assumptions about vaccines, guided by the principle of maximizing overall health outcomes, not robotically pushing vaccines as a panacea for infectious diseases.  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

If you are a blind and faithful ‘vaccine’ proponent, COVID should have opened your eyes to the unabashedly fraudulent system surrounding it all. Corrupt government agencies who own patents and receive royalties have been repeating ‘safe and effective‘ now for decades despite all evidence to the contrary.  Similarly to Lymeland, studies have been rigged for a pre-determined outcome or they simply eliminate inconvenient evidence, including suddenly retracting peer-reviewed science.  All sorts of shenanigans occur to make vaccines look good all the while ignoring and gas-lighting the vaccine-injured and the unvaccinated.

Go here to listen to doctor after doctor discussing the very real problems surrounding vaccinations. Vaccine information is being censored from nearly every platform.  ‘Authorities’ simply don’t want you to know the following truths about vaccines:

  • They contain toxic ingredients
  • The CDC has been lying about vaccine injuries and deaths for decades
  • The vaccine given in trials are often not what is given to the public
  • Vaccines are used in lieu of a true placebo making them appear safer than they are
  • Trials often do not have a true control group
  • Infant deaths due to vaccines are NEVER listed on death certificates but are listed as SIDS due to a lack of ICD code
  • Vaccines can reactivate latent infections
  • Vaccines have contained retroviruses and other cancer and disease causing viruses
  • Corrupt ‘public health’ has never done a study comparing the vaccinated to the unvaccinated
  • Corrupt ‘public health’ has never done a study looking at the cumulative effect of vaccines – particularly looking at metal accumulation
  • Corrupt ‘public health’ never admits vaccines can cause the very disease they are supposed to cure
  • Doctors get kickbacks for pushing vaccines on their patients
  • Go here for more shenanigans ‘public health’ plays

Americans Must Stop WHO Pandemic Power Grab

https://anh-usa.org/americans-must-stop-who-pandemic-power-grab/

Americans Must Stop WHO Pandemic Power Grab

This past weekend, a group of experts and health freedom fighters joined together at the International Crisis Summit (ICS-5) to discuss mRNA vaccine data, censorship, and the global control of public health policy during pandemics by the World Health Organization (WHO). Action Alert!


THE TOPLINE

  • Last week’s International Crisis Summit highlighted key threats to health freedom.
  • Politicians, scientists, doctors, and journalists from around the world spoke about their experiences during the pandemic and the failings of pandemic policies devised by public health authorities.
  • If we want to put the brakes on an expansion of these types of policies during the next pandemic, we must stop the World Health Organization’s power grab.

“A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths a statistic.”

This chilling quote from Soviet leader Joseph Stalin was used to frame this year’s International Crisis Summit, where voices from around the world came together to discuss key threats to health sovereignty. The relevance of the quote was quickly brought to a point when Cristian Terhes, a member of the European Parliament from Romania, referenced official European Medicine Agency reports (that are likely considerably estimated) of more than 12,000 cases of spontaneous death in the European Union (EU) and European Economic Area (EEA) from the COVID vaccines. This is a shocking statistic, that translates to one death for every 100,000 doses administered, that you don’t see reported or discussed widely at all.

The dozens of speakers over the course of the day on Friday, February 24th covered a dizzying array of topics that are worthy of your attention, but in this article we’ll synthesize some of these points into a few themes:

  • It was proposed that politicians, drugmakers, and public health officials unleashed a novel, largely untested, mRNA vaccine onto the population, and we’re only just starting to get a handle on the magnitude of the death and suffering this rollout has caused (and is still causing).
  • Tied to this is the deployment of a massive censorship apparatus that has been referred to as the “censorship industrial complex.” In ways that might make Orwell blush, the government and Big Tech companies have a mind-bending amount of power to control what we think, how we feel, and what we can discuss. These tools are being used to marginalize or eliminate dissent from mainstream views on health as determined by the powers that be (read the CDC, FDA, World Health Organization, etc.).
  • And finally, tying everything together, are the plans to institute control under conditions of health emergency, that was seen by many speakers as akin to a bid for global governance, with the control center at the World Health Organization (WHO) HQ in Geneva. The remit, during a future pandemic, appears to be to seek ways of controlling populations while institutionalizing and accelerating future efforts to roll out genetic vaccines in a climate of extreme censorship falsely justified by an apparent need to eliminate misinformation, disinformation and malinformation (MDM).

What they didn’t tell us about COVID vaccines

A slew of experts at the Summit spoke to deeply troubling aspects of the mRNA COVID shots that millions of Americans have received, most without properly informed consent.

Among the points made: no vaccine has caused more adverse events than the COVID vaccines, nor  has such a wide constellation of negative effects been reported. The government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting (VAERS) database currently lists over 1 million adverse events including nearly 15,000 deaths. However, we also know that VAERS captures only about an estimated 1 percent of actual adverse events. Another interpretation of VAERS data proposes that over 37,000 deaths have been reported from COVID-19 vaccines.

Dr. William Makis, a radiation oncologist in Canada, pointed to the explosion of excess deaths and disabilities being reported in younger people, with large numbers of neurological injuries, heart problems, autoimmune issues, and “turbo cancers”—a novel term used to describe very rapid, metastatic growth of cancers in those who have received the COVID vaccines.

One theory for these cancers is that the COVID vaccines damage the immune system and impair cancer surveillance, allowing cancers to run amok before being detected.

Why is this happening? One possible explanation for all these adverse events is offered by Kevin McKernan, the founder of Medicinal Genomics, who spoke about his work finding DNA contamination in COVID vaccines. As McKernan points out in a Substack article, this is an indication of endotoxin contamination, and “whenever you see high levels of plasmid contamination derived from gram negative bacteria like E.coli, you should expect high levels of endotoxin contamination. Injecting endotoxin can lead to anaphylaxis and toxic shock syndrome (emphasis added).”

Another issue raised was “frameshifting.” The mRNA vaccine is supposed to work by giving our cells the instructions to make a modified version of the spike protein of the COVID virus to train our immune system. But what if our cells instead get a garbled message and make the wrong protein? The production of unintended, and potentially dangerous, proteins as a result of mRNA vaccination is another possible driver of the staggering number of adverse events we’re seeing.

The overarching point is that mass roll-out was initiated at “warp speed” in the absence of adequate information about known risks and uncertainties. The tactic used to encourage high coverage is often described as “coercive” and breached the medical ethics principle of autonomy. Those who exercised their right of refusal were called “selfish”, medical doctors who proposed early treatments were threatened or struck off by licensing boards, and scientists who dissented were marginalized and labeled “conspiracy theorists”. Both the effectiveness and the safety of the vaccines was exaggerated. Dr. Makis predicted a “tsunami” of autoimmune and neurological effects in the coming years as a result of mass COVID vaccination campaigns.

Censorship run amok

The advent of the “censorship industrial complex” was another key theme developed throughout the Summit. This is something we’ve been reporting on (e.g. here and here), and it is one of the more concerning trends working against health freedom.

Robert Malone, one of the key organizers of the Summit, spoke about the work of Robert Epstein and colleagues finding that Google can shift voting preferences of undecided voters by 20 percent or more by tweaking its search algorithms. This speaks to the incredible power of artificial-intelligence (AI) assisted algorithms to shape what we think, and this power is increasingly being used to get us to comply with whatever the health authorities say is correct. Anything questioning the prevailing narrative (for example, that vaccination against COVID is not only safe but necessary, and anyone who disagrees is a selfish, deluded anti-vaxxer) can be flagged, taken down, or deprioritized, effectively eliminating it from the public discourse—no matter if these critics are eventually proven right.

Tunnel-vision and censorship cost lives. Drs. Pierre Kory and Simone Gold spoke to how this censorship was deployed in the case of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, off-patent drugs that were used to save lives but which stood in the way of vaccine uptake. As a result, those who used alternative methods to save patients were fired, sidelined, attacked, delegitimized, shamed —the whole gambit.

The consequences of this tectonic shift in the government’s ability to propagandize us is that the concept of personal autonomy, at least in the minds of the authorities, has been rendered obsolete. They made it very difficult and challenging for people to avoid complying with the pandemic plans—compliance, by contrast, was made out to be the only reasonable option for reasonable people, especially if they wished to be valued by their communities.

Consider our recent reporting on shadowbanning, when Big Tech companies deprioritize certain content—sometimes as basic as information on keto diets or intermittent fasting—so it doesn’t even show up in your searches. You won’t know it’s happening; you just won’t see certain content, and certain views will quietly disappear. How do they select their targets? Big Tech companies establish community guidelines like YouTube’s new medical misinformation policy, whereby information that isn’t in line with what the WHO or the CDC says is “correct” gets banned.

In this way, the censorship industrial complex is being deployed as an “unrecognized superweapon,” to borrow the phrase used by Rodney Palmer, a Canadian journalist who presented on this topic at the Summit.

The WHO Gambit

Regular readers of our newsletter will know all about the Pandemic “accord” (sometimes also referred to as a “treaty”) and the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) being negotiated at the WHO.

A number of speakers, including Austrian doctor Maria Hubmer-Mogg and Dr. Meryl Nass, went over the specific ways in which these two parallel processes at the WHO represent an assault on sovereignty and health freedom in the name of “equity” and world governance. They discussed many of the same issues we’ve relayed to you in our coverage.

Dr. Nass stressed how secrecy and complexity are key parts of the strategy used to deceive the public. It’s secret because so much of these negotiations take place behind closed doors by un-elected bureaucrats (another term for such secret negotiations is “conspiracy”). Regarding complexity: just try to find out what’s going on with these two processes, and it’s easy to get lost in an alphabet soup of acronyms, hundreds of pages of text and legalese, layer upon layer of bureaucracy, and (deliberate?) misrepresentations by those defending what’s going on. Dr. Nass correctly pointed out that this complexity serves a function: to confuse us, keep us off balance, and therefore prevent us from understanding what’s happening to us.

Put simply, the WHO is stewarding plans to ensure a more uniform application of medical countermeasures in the next pandemic, which it reserves the right to declare based on very limited criteria. If you thought that lockdowns, vaccine and mask mandates, travel restrictions and surveillance that were pursued during the COVID pandemic period were too aggressive,  these will look like a practice run compared with what they will likely have in store for us. The goal of the WHO and the special interests that are backing these efforts is more centralization of healthcare decision-making that negates autonomy and the doctor/patient relationship in favor of ‘medicine’ and population control by diktat.

This Summit demonstrated that there are a group of health freedom fighters who won’t give up autonomy without a fight—that there is a movement emanating from the grassroots opposing efforts to take away our freedoms.

Action Alert! Write to Congress and tell them you oppose the IHR amendments and the ‘pandemic treaty’ and because you value democracy, any changes that are proposed by the US must undergo Senate scrutiny and ratification. Please send your message immediately. (Go to link to contact your Reps)

Fluoride on Trial

https://anh-usa.org/fluoride-on-trial/

Fluoride on Trial

Fluoride on Trial
Will the EPA be compelled by a federal court to end the dangerous fluoridation of drinking water?

THE TOPLINE

  • A federal court will decide, in a few weeks time, whether the EPA needs to stop allowing the fluoridation of water.
  • Fluoride exposure has been linked to neurological effects and a host of other bad health outcomes.
  • Fluoridation is not only dangerous for your health, it is unnecessary.

Groups suing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over the fluoridation of American drinking water are now awaiting a decision from a federal court after the trial ended last week. The basis of the suit was the EPA’s rejection of the groups’ Citizens Petition calling on the agency to end the addition of fluoridation chemicals into drinking water due to fluoride’s neurotoxicity. It’s high time fluoridation ceases, as numerous studies have linked fluoride exposure with lower IQ and other health problems.

Substantial evidence links elevated fluoride levels with neurological effects, especially lower IQ. Fluoride also accumulates in the body, including in the pineal gland, other endocrine organs and the skeletal systemContinued exposure is known to disrupt calcium and vitamin D metabolism and contributes to calcification in tissues and blood vessels. A National Research Council (NRC) report from 2006 concluded that the EPA’s standard for fluoride in drinking water is unsafe and should be lowered. The report highlighted damage that can be done to the teeth, bones, brain, endocrine system, thyroid, and pineal gland—all from drinking fluoride. In 2014, fluoride was added to the list of chemicals “known to cause developmental neurotoxicity in human beings” in a review published by Lancet Neurology; only 12 chemicals are on this list.

According to the Citizen’s Petition filed by the Fluoride Action Network, Organic Consumers Association, Food & Water Watch, and others, in the years since that 2006 NRC report, there have been dozens of human studies looking at fluoride’s effect on cognition, with all but a few (46 out of 54) finding statistically significant associations between fluoride and cognitive deficits; three studies since 2006 have found adverse effects on the fetal brain.

Fluoride has been added to drinking water in towns across the United States since 1945 for the purpose of improving dental health. Now, 66% of people in the US receive drinking water with added fluoride.

Even if there weren’t any safety concerns with drinking fluoride, there would still be the question of whether we need to do it in the first place. The world is different than it was 100 years ago, especially when it comes to dental health. Most of us use toothpaste, and many people use fluoridated toothpaste, making fluoride in water unnecessary. Other parts of the world that do not fluoridate their water, like Western Europe, have seen dental decay rates decline just as much as they have in the US.

Fluoride is typically delivered as sodium monofluorophosphate or sodium fluoride in dental products and as fluorosilicic acid (a by-product of fertilizer manufacturing) in municipal water. These are chemical forms that are not found in nature and as such, behave very differently in our bodies. You can read more about integrative dental health herehere, and here.

We will keep you abreast of the court’s decision as we learn more. It’s unfortunate that an agency tasked with protecting us from pollutants must be sued in an effort to force it to do the right thing in the public interest. However, we are finding, repeatedly, this is par for the course when agencies are captured by the interests they are meant to regulate.

For more:

90% of US Cheese is GMO By Pfizer & Timeline to Replace Dairy With SynBio “Milk” Proteins

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2024/March/PDF/gmo-cheese-pdf.pdf

Genetically Modified Ingredients in Most US Cheeses

Analysis by Ashley Armstrong

3/4/24

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Traditionally, cheese was made with just four ingredients: milk, salt, starter culture and animal rennet
  • Rennet is used as a clotting agent to curdle the milk into cheese, separating the liquid parts of milk from the solids. It’s an essential part of the cheese making process
  • Today, there are four types of rennet used in the cheese making industry: animal rennet, vegetable rennet, microbial rennet, and a genetically modified version called FPC (fermentation-produced chymosin), made by Pfizer
  • Bioengineered chymosin (FPC) was granted Generally Regarded as Safe (GRAS) status, which exempted Pfizer from the pre-approved requirements that apply to other new food additives. This despite the fact that studies have detailed concerns about safety
  • An estimated 90% of North American cheese is made with FPC rennet, and ingredient labels do not distinguish between bioengineered rennet and the original animal-based type so consumers have no way of knowing what they’re eating

In this article let’s dive into why I believe you should only be eating cheese made with ANIMAL RENNET, and how over 90% of the cheese sold in the U.S. does not use this and instead uses a genetically modified version made by Pfizer.

Cheese History

Who doesn’t love cheese?! And for good reason — it is not only delicious but also incredibly nutritious. And despite what mainstream tells us, humans have been making and consuming this superfood for over 7,000 years.1,2,3 In fact, cheese serves an important role in human history.

Historians document that milk, dairy and fermented dairy products, like cheese, served as a nutrient-dense calorie source that was storable, allowing some of the first explorers to safely travel and expand communities, creating more demographic shifts and diverse farming communities.

Dairy provided food security, as it is a nutrient-rich superfood.

Consumption of milk and dairy products would have had many advantages for early farming populations. Milk, yogurt, and cheese are good sources of calories, protein, and fat. They provide a reliable food between harvests or during droughts, epidemics, or famines.

Milk is a relatively pathogen-free source of fluids that could be critical during times of water scarcity. Cheese provides a means of storing these nutrients to be used when milk production is low, and can be easily transported.

Furthermore, fermentation of milk into yogurt or cheese lowers lactose content and allows lactose intolerant individuals to reap the benefits, while maintain, or in some cases enhancing, other essential nutrients such as fat and calcium.”4

But cheese was traditionally made with just these four ingredients:

1.Milk

2.Salt

3.Starter culture, what’s used to make the desired cheese strain (for ex. Muenster versus Swiss)

4.Animal rennet, used as a clotting agent to curdle the milk into cheese, separating the liquid parts of milk from the solids — a very vital part of the cheese making process!

You add culture to milk and let it ferment. Then, you add rennet, which separates the milk into curds and whey. Then you press the curds and age them. And voila — cheese!

Rennet is a complex set of enzymes that are naturally produced in the stomachs of ruminant animals, like cows. The main enzyme present is chymosin, which is a protease enzyme, meaning it breaks down protein. Rennet from animals also contains other enzymes like pepsin and lipase.

So these enzymes in rennet target casein, the main protein in milk. They cause the casein molecules to divide and re-coagulate into even larger clumps, forming cheese curds. So, rennet serves as a vital part of cheesemaking since it helps curdle the milk into cheese, separating the liquid part from the solid part.

Types of Rennet

There are four types of rennet used in the cheese making industry: animal rennet, vegetable rennet, microbial rennet, and FPC (a GMO version).

1.Animal rennet — Animal rennet is the most natural and oldest form of rennet, and what was traditionally used in cheese making. There are milk-clotting enzymes naturally occurring in the stomach lining of ruminant animals. It is well known in the cheese making industry that animal rennet produces a superior flavor, likely because this rennet is a complex set of enzymes (as nature intended), rather than a single isolated enzyme derived in a lab.

Animal rennet is usually 90% chymosin enzyme and 10% pepsin enzyme. The small amount of pepsin will break down the casein protein in milk in a slightly different way compared to just chymosin alone, producing a final product with an enhanced taste.

Cheese made using animal rennet not only tastes better, but it also produces a safer and more natural final cheese product, which will be discussed in depth below.

2.Vegetable rennet — One alternative to animal rennet is vegetable rennet, which unfortunately varies a lot depending on the source, and the term “vegetable rennet” is misused a lot. True vegetable rennet is derived from plants that possess coagulation enzymes. And these plant extracts have been used as milk coagulants since ancient times. Some examples include cardoon thistle, fig tree bark, or nettles.

However, it is well known in the cheese industry that vegetable rennet can negatively impact the final texture and flavor of the cheese.5,6

“Most plant-derived [enzymes] typically exhibit low MCA/PA ratios resulting in poor cheese yield and formation of bitter substances during cheese ripening … Therefore, most of them are not suitable for cheese production.”7

Which is why most of the cheese with the label “vegetable rennet” isn’t real vegetable rennet. It’s either microbial rennet (made from mold) or FPC (the GMO version) since there is no regulation on the terms used for what rennet is used in cheese labeling.

3.Microbial rennet — Another alternative to animal rennet is “microbial rennet,” where the coagulating enzymes are produced by a specific type of mold, fungus or yeast organism grown and fermented in a lab setting (often fed soy). Yum. So while the microorganisms aren’t genetically modified, their food source likely is.

This is considered vegetarian friendly as the enzyme produced by the organism is not derived from an animal. There is again a large consensus in the cheesemaking world that cheeses made with this type of microbial rennet can lead to a final cheese product with a bitter taste. This option is commonly used in “certified organic” and “certified vegetarian” cheeses.

“Microbial [enzymes] are mainly produced by fungi and bacteria in the process of growth and metabolism. Microorganisms have the advantages of a short growth cycle, easy fermentation, and are not limited by space and region of production …

Therefore, the cost of microbial MCEs is low … However, it is found that most MCEs [microbial enzymes] have high PA and low MCA/PA ratios leading to low cheese yield and bitterness.”8

4.Genetically modified FPC — To overcome some of the shortcomings of the vegetable and microbial rennets like the potential bitter cheese taste, scientists have leveraged genetic engineering technology to create new, genetically modified species that generate these milk-curdling enzymes.

Introducing the most common alternative to animal rennet in cheese making — FPC, which stands for Fermentation-Produced Chymosin (FPC). (Chymosin referring to the enzyme that curdles milk, and is naturally present in the stomach lining of ruminant animals).

In fact, 90% of the cheese manufactured in the U.S. uses these enzymes from genetically modified organisms.9

FPC was created by the one and only Pfizer (biotech company) and is made possible by using CRISPR gene editing technology10 where the genomes of living organisms are modified. The “safety” of FPC was evaluated by a 90 day trial in rats.11

How FPC Is Made

Here’s how it is made: The rennet producing gene is taken out of the animal cell’s DNA string and then inserted into the bacteria, yeast or mold host cell’s DNA string in a process known as gene splicing (a type of recombinant DNA technology). Once inserted, the newly placed gene initiates the production of the chymosin enzyme within the host. The host culture is then cultivated and fermented.

These recombinant DNA technologies are relatively new and became popular in the 1980s when the U.S. Supreme Court by a 5-4 vote ruled that new life forms can be patented.12 So then in 1990, in another precedent-setting decision by a U.S. government office, the FDA approved the use of FPC in food. It was the first time a bioengineered product was permitted in food in the U.S. It gets better.

This bioengineered chymosin (FPC) was granted Generally Regarded as Safe (GRAS) status, which exempted Pfizer from the pre-approved requirements that apply to other new food additives.

Since Pfizer demonstrated what is often referred to as “substantial equivalence,” the FDA concluded that bioengineered chymosin was substantially equivalent to calf rennet and needed neither special labeling nor indication of its source or method of production.

In case you didn’t know, this “GRAS” label is a little hand wavy and just a big loophole. In general, federal law requires the FDA to ensure that food additives are safe and mandates a rigorous pre-market safety review process. But the loophole = GRAS.

The GRAS Loophole

Forty-three percent of food additives are designated “GRAS” and don’t get FDA oversight. Essentially, we must trust that food companies will conduct unbiased safety determinations before adding these new GRAS substances to our food.

“According to the FDC Act, food additives that are non-GRAS need approval prior to marketing. In contrast, GRAS substances do not require approval or notification to the USFDA prior to marketing.”13

Meaning the public and other regulatory agencies lack the data needed to assess the safety of some chemicals in our foods. In 2014, Former Deputy FDA Commissioner for Foods Michael Taylor commented on FDA’s failure to regulate food chemicals, saying:14 “We simply do not have the information to vouch for the safety of many of these chemicals.”

GRAS may have started out with good intentions, but it has turned out to be a giant loophole for food companies to get a free pass to use chemical additives in our food with little to no oversight. And of course, there is no other developed country in the world that has a system as archaic as GRAS for approving food additives. Okay tangent aside, back to FPC.

FPC Cheese Is Exempt From GMO Labeling

Even though the organisms that produce this FPC are genetically modified, dairy products using this technology are exempt from having to label their products as “GMO.” In fact, FPC is just listed as “microbial rennet” or “vegetable rennet” on labels. (The source of the rennet is not required to be listed). So it is a little deceiving.

The “Non-GMO” national project does not agree with this FPC technology and believes this is a high-risk ingredient. Moreover, FPC is not permitted in USDA Organic cheeses. And here is a comment from the American Cheese Society:

“FPC rennet is a genetically modified organism (GMO). According to the culture companies, 90% of North American cheese is made with FPC rennet. But ingredient labels do not distinguish between this type of microbial rennet and the original non-GMO type.

And the fact that use of FPC-type microbial rennet is not labeled a GMO leaves those who oppose GMOs in the dark when it comes to choosing cheese.”

And once again, FPC is used in 90% of the cheese made in the U.S.! These alternative rennet methods are up to 2X cheaper than using animal rennet, since it speeds up the aging process to make cheese ready for market faster, which means more profits.

They also allows cheese companies to market to vegetarians (since animal rennet, derived from the stomach of a ruminant animal, would not be allowed). But is FPC safe?

Safety Concerns of GM Enzymes

Well, again, this technology is new. So there are no long term studies evaluating the safety of eating a small amount of this genetically modified food additive every single day.15 But there are two main concerns: 1) toxicity and 2) digestive issues since these rennet alternatives can serve as an allergen.16

Toxicity Concerns

Toxicity meaning that the enzyme solution contains bio toxins from the genetically modified host (mold or fungus) that is being cultured and fermented in the lab. The producers of these enzymes claim the final FPC enzyme solution is highly purified, but some people react as though they still contain some of the allergens from the host microorganisms themselves.

In fact, traces of the genetically engineered bacteria have been found in enzymes.17 A few quotes from the literature regarding these toxicity concerns. I don’t know about you, but I have no desire to consume bio toxins from genetically modified organisms!

“Genetically modified food enzymes are currently produced from GMOs. Safety concerns have been raised regarding potential contamination of food with bacterial toxins or mycotoxins, allergens, or uncharacterized extraneous substances as impurities.”18

“Because these enzymes are purified from microbial sources, toxic substances might be present in enzyme preparations/isolates. The toxic substances are basically bacterial toxins and mycotoxins, which might cause problems/risks related to the health of consumers.

Safety legislation is also very much attentive regarding the allergenic properties of manufactured enzymes, as it is well known that enzymes are potent inhalative sensitizers.

Apart from that, numerous uncharacterized extraneous substances/ impurities of microbial/biological origin may also be present in the enzyme preparation, which is also a matter of prime concern while evaluating the safety of commercial enzyme products.”19

“While food enzyme preparations are considered unlikely to cause any acute toxicity, genotoxicity, or repeat-dose oral toxicity, it is the fermentation product(s) of microorganisms from the manufacturing process that is/are of interest due to the potential presence of secondary metabolites that may induce toxicity when ingested (eg. aflatoxins, fumonisins and/or ochratoxins).”20

So, some are concerned about continuous ingestion of these bio toxins over time, and the negative health consequences those would have over the course of years. And unfortunately, there isn’t much regulation here. “Currently, the companies themselves are responsible for the quality control of their products.”21 Gee, that’s not helpful!

Allergens and Digestive Issues

So as a result of a small amount of these toxins potentially showing up in the final cheese product (and slight structural changes in the final proteins), the cheese can now serve as an allergen and can cause an allergic reaction, or digestive and respiratory issues.22

  • Stomach upset or discomfort
  • Runny nose, increase in mucus production

Consumers then may think they can’t digest cheese — but hey, maybe it is just the cheese that was made! It may not be the dairy itself, but the microorganism residues that elicit an allergic response, or irritate the gut lining.

I personally do not digest cheese that is made with this FPC (which again can be “vegetable rennet” or “microbial rennet” on labels). I get stomach upset and a disruption of my normal bowel movements. So something isn’t going right there! I can only digest cheese made with animal rennet, so I am very picky with what cheese I consume day to day!

GMO Cheese May Compromise Your Gut Health

One of the biggest issues here is the potential disruption of the gut microbiome.

“Lastly, the case study highlights the issues related to the dissemination of [antimicrobial resistance] genes due to their potential acquisition by the human commensal flora, via direct food consumption and by environmental bacteria through contact with soil and water surfaces or food waste. This is especially the case as a living GMM [genetically modified micro-organism] was found in a FE [enzyme] preparation.”23

In addition, allergic responses from ingesting the biotoxin residues or modified protein structures.

“A known safety risk linked to industrial enzyme use is respiratory allergy and for most proteases there is also some potential for skin and eye irritation … Enzymes present a risk of a respiratory allergy (e.g. Aspergillus-derived enzymes in bakers’ asthma) and it is well described in the scientific literature …”24

“Genetic modification of enzymes may also change their allergenic properties, posing new potential health risks. For instance, type I sensitization was found in a study of 813 exposed industrial workers using genetically modified enzymes.”25

So, it is documented in the literature, I experience it personally, and have heard from multiple other people — some people have digestive issues digesting the microbial and vegetable rennets. But do just fine with cheese made in a traditional manner with animal rennet. There are consequences when we try to outsmart nature!

Our Cheese

So, if you have previously had digestive issues or allergy-like reactions to cheese, the type of rennet may have been the issue, not the dairy itself! KNOW YOUR DAIRY!

Our cheese at Nourish Cooperative is not only made with raw, A2A2 milk, but we ONLY use animal rennet in all of our cheese varieties — leading to easier to digest, NON GENETICALLY MODIFIED, nourishing and delicious cheese. We prefer that cheese is made the traditional way, as nature intended. So if you don’t digest other cheeses well, you can likely digest ours just fine! KNOW YOUR FARMER AND KNOW YOUR CHEESE INGREDIENTS!

We are soon accepting new members to our farm cooperative, where we ship the best cheese (along with meat, dairy and sourdough) to all 50 states. Join the waitlist here: nourishcooperative.com.

Ashley Armstrong, with a Ph.D., MS and BS in mechanical engineering and a certified personal trainer, is the cofounder of Angel Acres Egg Co., which specializes in low-PUFA (polyunsaturated fat) eggs. We discussed the importance of low-PUFA eggs in a recent interview, embedded above for your convenience.

Angel Acres ships their eggs to all 50 states — but there is currently a waiting list as she slowly increases the number of chickens within the network to fulfill the demand. If you want to purchase low-PUFA eggs from Armstrong’s farm, join the waiting list at angel-acresfarm.com/pages/waitlist-for-eggs. More egg boxes opening up this spring!

– Sources and References
Go here to learn of the conflicts of interests in “Independent” organic certification.

______________

**Comment**

You just can’t make this stuff up…..

https://organicconsumers.org/timeline-of-efforts-to-replace-dairy-farms-with-synbio-milk-protiens-goes-back-to-1894/

Got Milk? Nope, It’s Fungus! Archer Daniels Midland & Bayer Want Us to Drink SynBio “Milk” with 92 Compounds Humans Have Never Eaten Before!

February 26, 2024  |  by Alexis Baden-Mayer

TAKE ACTION: Ban New GMO Frankenfoods Made with Synthetic Biology!

National Public Radio calls it a conspiracy theory, but there’s no denying that the World Economic Forum has been promoting eating insects as part of its Great Reset.

Obviously this is real and even government funded, but it’s a distraction from synthetic biology, aka precision fermentation, which is the most profitable monopoly-controlled technology of the Great Reset of food and farming.

As bad as cricket farming is, it’s low-tech and requires human beings to manage. Production could be decentralized and local.

The most powerful World Economic Forum company in food and agriculture is Monsanto (now Bayer). It has long been implementing a controlled demolition of the profession of farming in favor of a single, high-tech system that can be controlled on a global scale.

When Bayer ran Auschwitz “for Hitler” as I.G. Farben’s largest factory, one of its products was “butter” made from coal. This is what U-boat sailors subsisted on.

Currently, their favorite synthetic food production model is the genetic engineering of microbes like yeast, fungi and E. coli to produce small molecules (proteins and nutrients) for highly processed Frankenfoods like “non-animal” whey and egg protein.

The dairy and egg industries are the first two agriculture sectors slated to be wiped out, dairy farmers by crushing debt and “environmental” regulations, and egg farmers by the bird flu.

It is fascinating to me that Metabiota, one of the bioweapons defense contractors involved in the creation of the pandemic virus (the other being EcoHealth Alliance), after being linked to Joe Biden and Ukraine labs through Hunter’s laptop, was absorbed by Ginkgo Bioworks, Bayer’s synbio partner in this plot to replace real food with the synthetic products of genetically engineered microbes. And, that Bayer’s favorite spokesperson for this brave new world is George Church, a scientist funded by Jeffrey Epstein and DARPA, who gave an Edge Masterclass for colleagues including Metabiota’s Nathan Wolf and Google’s Larry Page, at Elon Musk’s Space X.

These guys aren’t going to run the world on crickets. They’re going to run it on an automated and robotic system where artificial intelligence designs genetically engineered microbes as factories for the production of synthetic food, medicine, chemicals and fuel. The U.S. Department of Agriculture that might fund crickets, but it’s the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) that’s been funding what will ultimately be the Great Reset’s choice Soylent Green: using microbes to turn waste into fuel.

Archer Daniels Midland is the company that gave us textured vegetable proteinhigh-fructose corn syruptrans fats and other unhealthy vegetable oilsall made from Monsanto’s Roundup Ready crops genetically engineered to be soaked in toxic glyphosate-based herbicides.

Now, they’re partnering with Perfect DayNew Culture and Ginkgo Bioworks on synthetic milk proteins that the industry predicts will put dairy farmers out of business.

Just like factory farmed milk, synbio “milk” is made from Monsanto (now Bayer)’s GMOs, but the corn is fed to genetically engineered fungus instead of cows.

I recently had the opportunity to interview our Organic & Natural Health Association partners John Fagan and Alan Lewis about the 92 compounds in synbio “milk” humans have never eaten before.

All of this got me wondering, How long has this plot to replace dairy farming with synbio milk been going on? What will corporations and the government do to get us to go along with it? This timeline has the answers:  (See link for timeline)

_____________

For more:

Deadly Meat Allergy

http://

Deadly Meat Allergy

A man suddenly has a cardiac arrest at home and the cause of his medical emergency is a mystery! Let’s solve the mystery together and learn about shock, septic shock, anaphylactic allergies and more!  Scroll to about the 14 minute mark to finally hear he has Alpha Gal.

This video was adapted from a published medical case report: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti…

For more:

It’s far from straight-forward just like Lyme/MSIDS.  So many unknowns.