Author Archive

Peer-Reviewed & Published Study on COVID-19 Shot Link to Death Censored TWICE & FLCCC Joins AAPS Lawsuit Against Board-Certifying Orgs For Censorship

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/breaking-news-twice-censored-landmark?

BREAKING NEWS – Twice-Censored Landmark COVID-19 Vaccine Autopsy Study Fully Peer-Reviewed and Published

After enduring relentless censorship, our systematic review linking COVID-19 vaccines to death is now available for the entire world to read.

2nd Smartest Guy in the World
Nov 19, 2024

In case there is anyone left who for whatever reason still somehow believes that the COVID-19 Modified mRNA “vaccine” platform is anything but a slow kill bioweapon, then the following bombshell article should dispel all remaining notions of “Safe and Effective” and “Trust the Science” once and for all.

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The largest COVID-19 vaccine autopsy study to-date, providing robust evidence that COVID-19 vaccines can cause death, has been officially republished following successful peer-review in the journal Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law: A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination. This comes after unethical censorship on two occasions: first, removal from Preprints with the Lancet and later, withdrawal by Elsevier after publication in Forensic Science International.

Hulscher N, Alexander P E., Amerling R, Gessling H, Hodkinson R, Makis W et al. A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination. Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. 2024 Nov 17; v5.2019-2024

Here’s what we found:

Background: The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, Spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction, and carcinogenicity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.

Methods: We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for all published autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. All autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy studies that included COVID-19 vaccination as an antecedent exposure were included. Because the state of knowledge has advanced since the time of the original publications, three physicians independently reviewed each case and adjudicated whether or not COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death.

Results: We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one organ-restricted autopsy case (heart). The mean age of death was 70.4 years. The most implicated organ system among cases was the cardiovascular (49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination, of which the primary causes of death include:

  • sudden cardiac death (35%)
  • pulmonary embolism (12.5%)
  • myocardial infarction (12%)
  • VITT (7.9%), myocarditis (7.1%)
  • multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%)
  • cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%)

Conclusions: The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine mechanisms of injury and death, coupled with autopsy confirmation by physician adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.

Our study indicates that the COVID-19 injectable products must undergo an immediate Class I recall by the FDA to protect public safety. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration defines a Class I recallas: “A situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.”

The censorship and retraction of studies that show COVID-19 mRNA injection harms is deeply concerning. First, this study was inappropriately removed from Preprints with the Lancet (SSRN). The paper was posted on the server on July 5th, 2023 and censored in less than 24 hours after receiving massive numbers of downloads and reads, “because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.” However, the study initially satisfied SSRN screening criteria, which raises grave suspicions of censorship.  (See link for article as well as proof of the vast censorship)

_______________

For more on vaccines:

For more on corruption:

https://flccc.substack.com/p/flccc-co-founders-join-aaps-lawsuit?

FLCCC Co-Founders Join AAPS Lawsuit Against ABIM and Board-Certifying Organizations for Censoring Physicians

“Without open scientific debate, we risk losing the opportunity to discover effective treatments and provide the best patient care.”

FLCCC Alliance
Nov 12, 2024
FLCCC ALLIANCE

FLCCC Co-Founders Join AAPS Lawsuit Against ABIM and Board-Certifying Organizations for Censoring Physicians

Washington, D.C. (November 12, 2024) – The FLCCC Alliance announced that its co-founders, Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik, are seeking by motion to join the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) Educational Foundation’s federal lawsuit against the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) and other board-certifying organizations as well as the Biden Administration. This lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Galveston, TX, seeks to hold accountable entities that have not only censored but retaliated against physicians, including Drs. Kory and Marik, for advocating evidence-based approaches to patient care that are contrary to public health agency directives. Drs. Kory and Marik asked the court to join the suit after ABIM’s unprecedented decision to revoke their board certifications for their public advocacy despite their expertise acquired through long and distinguished careers.

FLCCC Co-founders Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory

The lawsuit alleges that ABIM engaged in tortious interference with their efforts to engage in a national debate over repurposed drugs and concerns about mRNA vaccination. The suit alleges that ABIM infringed on their freedom of speech, contractual due process rights, and includes defamation claims on behalf of Drs. Kory and Marik.

“Consensus-Driven” Medicine Cited as Rationale for Decertification

Since May 2022, when the ABIM first issued a Notice of Potential Disciplinary Action, Drs. Kory and Marik have tirelessly defended their efforts on the part of FLCCC’s positions, providing substantial medical and scientific evidence to support their recommendations for early COVID-19 treatment and critiques of vaccine risks. Despite these eminent physicians’ submitting over 170 references in a comprehensive 60-page response in January 2023, the ABIM chose to dismiss these scientific contributions in favor of a narrow, “consensus-driven” narrative—a rationale used as grounds for the revocation of their board certifications.

The AAPS case against ABIM and its co-defendants was originally dismissed by the District Court but was reinstated against the board defendants by the Fifth Circuit in its opinion that expressed strong concern about the suppression of medical viewpoints.

In response to their recent decertifications, Dr. Marik underscored the pressing need to protect medical freedom and accountability in healthcare:

“True progress in medicine depends on the free exchange of ideas and the courage to challenge established norms. Without open scientific debate, we risk losing the opportunity to discover effective treatments and provide the best patient care.”

“This fight is about more than just our right to speak—it’s about protecting the future of healthcare and putting these organizations on notice. When doctors are silenced for questioning the prevailing narrative, we all lose,” said Dr. Kory.

“We must ensure that medical decisions are guided by expertise and evidence, not by fear of reprisal.”

A Stand for Free Medical Speech and Patient Care

The lawsuit contends that board-certifying organizations, including the ABIM, the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM), and the American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology (ABOG), have acted in concert together and with the federal government to suppress and retaliate against physicians with dissenting viewpoints, thus infringing upon First Amendment rights. President and Chief Medical Officer of FLCCC Dr. Joseph Varon highlighted the critical need for organizations like FLCCC to stand behind medical professionals facing such reprisals.

“The FLCCC Alliance firmly believes that the essence of medical science lies in the open dialogue, exchange of ideas, and rigorous debate of differing perspectives. However, the actions of the ABIM reflect a troubling trend towards censoring any opinions that challenge the status quo. This censorship stifles innovation, limits treatment options for patients, and ultimately harms the doctor-patient relationship.”

Seeking Justice and Accountability

This case represents a broader fight for the integrity of healthcare, protecting physicians’ right to practice honest medicine based on clinical experience and scientific evidence. The FLCCC Alliance remains steadfast in its mission to advocate for healthcare providers’ autonomy, ensuring that the voices of Drs. Kory and Marik, and other medical professionals, are not silenced. This lawsuit is a pivotal step toward safeguarding medical integrity and patient care freedom for practitioners and patients around the world.

About the FLCCC Alliance
The FLCCC Alliance, a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization, was formed in March 2020 by a group of highly published, world-renowned critical care physicians and scholars with the academic support of allied physicians worldwide. Known for its lifesaving protocols for preventing and treating COVID-19 in all stages of illness, including “long COVID” and post-vaccination syndrome, the FLCCC has expanded its work to include treatment guides for various other conditions, such as sepsis, metabolic disease, cancer, and depression. The organization is dedicated to Honest Medicine™ that prioritizes patients above profits and emphasizes long-term wellness and the empowerment of both physicians and their patients. For more information, visit flccc.net

About AAPS

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons – AAPS – is a non-partisan professional association of physicians in all types of practices and specialties across the country.

Since 1943, AAPS has been dedicated to the highest ethical standards of the Oath of Hippocrates and to preserving the sanctity of the patient-physician relationship and the practice of private medicine. www.aapsonline.org

Will You Support Honest Medicine?

Your support is vital to advancing our mission. As the ABIM situation continues to unfold, we need your support to defend doctors and uphold your right to healthcare free from harmful influences.

By contributing to the Honest Medicine Movement, you’re not just donating—you’re becoming a crucial part of our effort to transform healthcare. Your support helps us expand our network of experts, amplify our global advocacy, and drive impactful initiatives.

Together, we can enhance patient care, reform broken systems, and champion the cause of transparent, evidence-based medicine. Every contribution fuels our key initiatives and brings us closer to a future where honest, reliable healthcare is accessible to all.

For more:

________________

**Comment**

Government collusion with the media, UNICEF, WEF, WHO, IFCN, FB, Google, and more has been  continually proven.

Nobody seems to notice or care that Fauci’s daughter worked at Twitter as a software engineer during the pandemic.  But I’m sure we should just believe him when he states they never discussed content posted to social media.

One other little factoid: Fauci’s wife serves in a leadership role overseeing bioethics at the NIH.  I’m sure that’s all kosher too, as well as the fact the pandemic vastly increased their household net worth from $7.6 million to $12.6 million between the start of 2020 and the end of 2021.  She also co-authored a March 2022 report approving of social ostracization for the “vaccine”- hesitant and encouraging employers to pressure their workers, which didn’t work out so well for the mayor of Chicago who recently lost her re-election bid, and now has to reinstate fired workers with back pay and a 7% interest on top.

Seems censorship has been going on long before COVID.  Anyone questioning vaccines is Wakefielded, those who disagree with government dictates is fired, or thrown in jail without a search warrant, and anyone defying the narrative is ‘disappeared.’

Category:

research, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Symptoms After Lyme: What’s Past is Prologue

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/33044899?

Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue (Adriana Marques, M.D.)

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
Nov 17, 2024

Please see the following email addressed to Dr. Adriana Marques, Chief of the NIAID Lyme Disease Studies Unit regarding her recent viewpoint published in the journal Science Translational Medicine. The Editorial Staff was Cc’d on this email.

Senior Editor Courtney Malo, Ph.D. responded to my inquiry and is posted below followed by my final comment.

Photo of Marques was found on the following NIH site:
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/adriana-marques-md

Inquiry to Adriana Marques:

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “amarques@niaid.nih.gov” <amarques@niaid.nih.gov>
Cc: “osmith@aaas.org” <osmith@aaas.org>, “mnorton@aaas.org” <mnorton@aaas.org>, “ccharneski@aaas.org” <ccharneski@aaas.org>, “cmalo@aaas.org” <cmalo@aaas.org>, “bberry@aaas.org” <bberry@aaas.org>, “dhallberg@aaas.org” <dhallberg@aaas.org>, “dneuhofer@aaas.org” <dneuhofer@aaas.org>, “mogle@aaas.org” <mogle@aaas.org>
Date: 11/14/2024 9:54 AM EST
Subject: Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE

13 Nov 2024

Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue
ADRIANA MARQUES
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.ado2103

“There have been five randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials addressing the question of whether additional antibiotic treatment benefits patients with PTLDS or symptoms attributed to Lyme disease.”

“The results of these trials showed that prolonged antibiotic treatment had no lasting benefit while having potential serious risks.”

Adriana Marques, M.D.
Lyme Disease Studies Unit
NIH Main Campus, Bethesda, MD

Dr. Marques,

For the record there are many infections requiring long-term antibiotics so why Klempner stopped his NIH funded antibiotic treatment trials for Lyme after “12 weeks” and then claimed no benefit makes absolutely no sense whatsoever:

From the following peer-reviewed publication:

Benefit of intravenous antibiotic therapy in patients referred for treatment of neurologic Lyme disease
https://www.dovepress.com/benefit-of-intravenous-antibiotic-therapy-in-patients-referred-for-tre-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJGM

Infections requiring long-term antibiotics: [See chart in the publication above with 8 examples ranging from 6mo to 5yrs]

In 1991 the Lyme disease organism, Borrelia burgdorferi, was grown from the cerebrospinal fluid of Lyme patient Vicki Logan at the Centers for Disease Control in Fort Collins, Colorado despite prior treatment with intravenous antibiotics. The patient died when the insurer refused additional IV antibiotics. Here is a copy of Logan’s CDC positive culture report for your review.

(Vicki Logan’s Chronic Lyme Autopsy results Page #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)

There are 700 peer-reviewed publications referencing persistent infection and in a 2018 study all patients were culture positive even after multiple years on antibiotics so there was no relief from current antimicrobials. Some of these patients had taken as many as eleven different types of antibiotics.

Thirty-four years ago Dr. Allen Steere identified chronic Lyme disease which should have set off a red flag prompting an immediate search for better antimicrobials but then did a 180° as he became principal investigator (PI) of the Phase 3 clinical trial for the first Lyme disease vaccine. So all the eggs were put into the vaccine basket while a campaign was orchestrated to discredit the sick and disabled patient population along with the courageous clinicians attempting to help these patients. Apparently, a chronic relapsing seronegative disease did not fit the business model of patent royalties, vaccine development and pharmaceutical profits.

Here is Dr. Steere’s 1990 publication summary for your review:

The New England Journal of Medicine 

Published November 22, 1990

Chronic neurologic manifestations of Lyme disease
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199011223232102

The chart below summarizes Lyme research funded by the NIH and only 2.5% has been allocated for treatment: [Click on link to view the chart]

Question:

Is there a reason why these facts/references/lab reports are missing from your viewpoint published in Science Translational Medicine?

A response to this inquiry is requested.Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH USA

Cc: Orla M. Smith, Ph.D. Editor, Science Translational Medicine

Editorial Staff

Melissa Norton, M.D.

Catherine A. Charneski, Ph.D.

Courtney S. Malo, Ph.D.

Brandon Berry, Ph.D.

Dorothy L. Hallberg, Ph.D.

Daniela Neuhofer, Ph.D.

Molly Ogle, Ph.D.

Response from Senior Editor Courtney Malo, Ph.D.

———- Original Message ———-
From: Courtney Malo <cmalo@aaas.org>
To: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
Cc: “Marques, Adriana (NIH/NIAID) [E]” <amarques@niaid.nih.gov>, Orla Smith <osmith@aaas.org>
Date: 11/14/2024 11:26 AM EST
Subject: Re: Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue

Dear Dr. Tuttle,

Thank you for your email in response to the viewpoint “Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue” published in Science Translational Medicine.

We suggest that you submit your comments as an eLetter via our website. To do so, please go to the paper under discussion (https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.ado2103 and navigate to the “eLetters” option at the very bottom of the page. Our eLetters platform provides a dynamic and rapid way for readers to provide feedback on the papers we publish and to elicit discussion.

Sincerely,
Courtney Malo

Courtney Malo, Ph.D. (she/her/hers)

Senior Editor

Science Translational Medicine

cmalo@aaas.org |  https://www.science.org/journal/stm

My final reply:

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: Courtney Malo <cmalo@aaas.org>
Cc: “Marques, Adriana (NIH/NIAID) [E]” <amarques@niaid.nih.gov>, Orla Smith <osmith@aaas.org>, “mnorton@aaas.org” <mnorton@aaas.org>, “ccharneski@aaas.org” <ccharneski@aaas.org>, “bberry@aaas.org” <bberry@aaas.org>, “dhallberg@aaas.org” <dhallberg@aaas.org>, “dneuhofer@aaas.org” <dneuhofer@aaas.org>, “mogle@aaas.org” <mogle@aaas.org>
Date: 11/16/2024 8:15 AM EST
Subject: Re: Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue

On 11/14/2024 11:26 AM EST Courtney Malo <cmalo@aaas.org> wrote: “We suggest that you submit your comments as an eLetter via our website.”

Dear Dr. Malo,

Thank you for responding to my email. Is my submitted eLetter in the process of being screened?

I would like to call attention to the following 1992 Science article that was listed directly below Dr. Marques’ published viewpoint:

Furor at Lyme Disease Conference: Patient-support groups got a dozen rejected papers reinstated at a Lyme disease meeting, angering researchers who had turned the work down as unscientific
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1604309

Excerpt:

To some authors of the controversial abstracts the grudging acceptance is too little too late, from a close-minded research community. “If [a finding] is not part of a controlled study, they ignore it,” says Long Island internist Burascano.

Dr. Malo,

Isn’t that exactly what I am questioning 32 years later? I am asking Marques why the peer-reviewed references I provided are missing from her published viewpoint:

My question to Marques:

“Is there a reason why these facts/references/lab reports are missing from your viewpoint published in Science Translational Medicine?”

It would appear that the act to suppress evidence of chronic Lyme disease spans three decades. How many lives have been destroyed resulting from inadequate treatment?

It is not uncommon for these corresponding authors to ignore serious inquires. One example is from my 2020 BMJ Letter to the Editor below. It should be noted that the corresponding author refused to respond to my inquiry after multiple requests from Editor-in-Chief Dr. Fiona Godlee.

Letter to the Editor of the BMJ published June 2020 
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1041/rr-1

Dr. Malo…. Has your journal been used as a podium to broadcast the long-established dogma while omitting evidence of persistent infection after extensive antibiotic treatment?

Respectfully submitted,
Carl Tuttle

_______________
**Comment**
Must thanks to patient and advocate Carl Tuttle for his tireless efforts dealing with knot-heads.  Kudos to you for having the patience of a saint.

Category:

Activism, Lyme, research, Testing, Treatment

Geoengineering Warfare: An Exposé

https://www.saveourskies.org/column-contributor

GEOENGINEERING WARFARE: An Exposé

A WAR CANNOT BE WON

WHEN IT IS NOT EVEN ACKNOWLEDGED THAT IT EXISTS

by Jorge Rebagliati

This exposé will demonstrate to you that Geoengineering Warfare is a past and present fact that is being waged in Sonoma County, in all of California, and elsewhere, threatening the very existence of humanity and the rest of the biosphere.

After reviewing the documentation presented below, it should be obvious to you that there is an ongoing Geoengineering war. The first indispensable local step is to issue a resolution banning all geoengineering operations in Sonoma County, demand that the California legislature and the governor ban geoengineering in California, and investigate and prosecute the planners and perpetrators of geoengineering warfare.

The Sonoma County community, where you live and which you love, is under relentless attack by Geoengineering Warfare. Irreparable damage may have already been done, but your (our) swift action to stop these aggressions and to clean up air, water, and soil, and the impacted life, will have tremendous benefits, SUCH AS MINIMIZING THE INCIDENCE OF “FIRE STORMS.”

No grant or subsidy money offered or given to Sonoma County by federal and state government agencies, corporations, or NGOs to do “the right thing” according to their agendas justifies putting the lives and property of Sonoma County residents at serious risk.

Consider that your inaction on the threat to all of us presented by Geoengineering Warfare can be considered “negligence” in fulfilling your duties of protecting the life and property of Sonomans that you swore to protect as an elected public official.

A very recent article (7/31/24) titled “Certain Dark Chocolates Contain High-Level Heavy Metals, Study Finds” indirectly exposes the contamination of food by the massive spraying of heavy metals (and other substances) by Geoengineering Warfare.

The article suggests that the sources of soil (and water) “contamination” are livestock manure, irrigation with wastewater or polluted water, application of sewage sludge, use of Metallo-pesticides or herbicides, phosphate-based fertilizers, and atmospheric deposition (chemtrails included?).

The case for “atmospheric deposition” likely being the primary source of contamination becomes even stronger when the article reports that for “unknown reasons”, organic cacao products had higher levels of heavy metals.  All the other listed possible sources of soil contamination, except livestock manure, do not apply to organic farming, so atmospheric deposition becomes the primary suspected source of the contamination.

As discussed in the article, lead and cadmium are the primary heavy metals tested in the study. Both are toxic nanomaterials used in Geoengineering, but they are just two of many others, such as aluminum, barium, strontium, vanadium, titanium, manganese, polymers, graphene, sulfuric acid, and surfactants.

And it is not just about chocolate: “Dark chocolate is just one potential source of heavy metal exposure in our diets. According to a 2019 review in Environmental International, a growing body of research has identified concerning levels of heavy metals in various food crops, including:

  • Fruits

  • Leafy vegetables—green cabbage, spinach, cauliflower, lettuce, kale

  • Root vegetables—radish, turnip, carrot

  • Wheat

  • Rice

  • Soybean

  • Corn

  • Garlic

Heavy metals are also potentially problematic in some marine fish, seafood,  herbal medicines, herbal teas, spices, fruit juice, and drinking water, particularly in areas with aging infrastructure or natural geological sources of contamination.”  (See link for highly referenced article and to take action)

_________________

**Comment**

This website has posted prolifically on geoengineering because it affects ALL life-forms on planet earth including the food we eat, which is medicine.

It appears that this geoengineering is also being used to relocate people from one area to another in something called ‘weather wars.’  Global governments admit to ‘cloud seeding,’ but not the fallout it causes.  The fallout is always blamed on ‘climate change,’

In a never-ending quest to destroy humanity, Bill Gates, who doesn’t vaccinate his own children but is hell-bent on vaccinating everyone else’s, also has a mission to ‘dim the sun,’ to supposedly counter the ‘climate emergency.’   Other schemes include stopping cows from farting and burping, limiting cars, and culling the ‘useless eaters.’  A few brave experts are telling the truth:

‘Climate change is a lie and a scam’ and green energy policies have made the climate worse – not to mention our health.

Category:

Activism, Climate, vaccines

Why Smart Meters Benefit Big Energy – Not Consumers

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/smart-meters-benefit-big-energy-not-consumers/?

Why Smart Meters Benefit Big Energy — Not Consumers

Energy companies are getting ever more heavy-handed in their tactics to meet quotas and hit govt net-zero targets. But who’s actually better off when we install a smart meter?

by Alliance for Natural Health International
November 6, 2024This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
woman thinking with smart meter and money

Increasingly, heavy-handed and even aggressive tactics are being adopted by energy companies to coerce the public into agreeing to the installation of smart meters.

Last weekend, United Kingdom (U.K.) energy provider, Octopus Energy, hit the headlines because it’s resorted to warning consumers that their existing analog meters have outlived their “best before date,” as if they were a food item.

They double down with fear tactics by implying that consumers are obligated under the law to replace a perfectly good meter. But it just isn’t so. The Alliance for Natural Health International’s executive coordinator, Meleni Aldridge, has been subject to such coercion from Octopus.

Deeply disappointing after years of providing excellent service and renewable energy, but the response was simply, to get a smart meter or find a new provider. So much for rewarding customer loyalty.

Such tactics are clearly being driven by government-imposed targets. As a result, the U.K. energy watchdog, Ofgem, is imposing punishing fines on companies not meeting installation targets.

In 2022 alone, energy companies in the U.K. that didn’t meet their targets agreed to pay Ofgem a total of 10.8 million pounds — of customers’ money!

How smart are smart meters?

According to a 2022 analysis by the U.S. organization, Mission:data Coalition, 97% of smart meters have failed to provide the customer savings originally promised in 2009.

A recent paper published in Cell Reports Physical Science blames the lack of savings on poor quality (= not so smart) data collected by smart meters.

In the U.K., for example, many households are experiencing overcharges and other issues due to smart meter faults, poor supplier management, and connectivity issues.

Technical issues and mismanagement by energy suppliers have led to a significant number of these meters not functioning correctly, leaving consumers unable to track their energy usage effectively and missing out on the potential savings and insights these devices are supposed to provide.

Added to this smart meters allow the energy companies to overcharge annually on top of what’s been used.

High-profile cases, such as artist Grayson Perry’s disputed bill increase from 300 to 39,000 pounds, spotlight the extreme consequences of not-so-smart meters. Consumers facing sudden spikes in their bills due to meter errors have seen little resolution, despite efforts to address these issues with energy suppliers.

The severe overcharging and billing errors raise concerns about whether the investment in smart meters is truly benefiting consumers.

In Canada, despite clever marketing techniques based on savings having persuaded consumers to make the switch to smart meters, “time-of-use” (TOU) tariffs have “backfired” as consumers have refused to change their consumption habits.

People have continued as normal and paid higher rates to use energy when they choose.

TOU tariffs are currently under consideration for introduction in the U.K. If they come in, energy companies will be able to charge different prices depending on the time of usage, the availability of so-called “green energy,” as well as the fluctuating cost of energy.

The big question is whether consumers will adapt and comply, or continue in a manner that befits their needs and lifestyle despite incurring higher costs.

The global smart meter market is currently valued at $24 billion and is projected to grow to a massive $77 billion by 2032.

But the truth is that early adopter countries are now facing significant bills to replace older technology that’s lost compatibility with evolving systems. Bills that are ultimately funded by us, the taxpayers.

In June 2024, 63% of all energy meters in the U.K. were “smart” or advanced meters. Despite the coercion and huge marketing budgets directed at convincing consumers to install the devices,  installation rates dropped by 11% as people became more and more distrusting of the technology.

The U.K. Department of Energy Security and Net Zero admits that 4 million devices aren’t working properly. However, independent research by The Money Saving Expert suggests that the figure could be significantly higher.

Smart and safe?

The safety or otherwise of smart meters still provokes heated debate, yet governments cling to those well-worn claims, “there are no health risks” and “smart meters are safe,” quoting industry-influenced studies along with guidelines from regulatory bodies, such as the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).

ICNIRP, which had its 2020 guidelines called into question and had to call on the World Health Organization (WHO) to prop up its claims.

However, the situation is far more nuanced than we’re led to believe and many find themselves experiencing a range of, often debilitating, health issues following the installation of a smart meter.

Smart meters work by constantly streaming data back to the relevant energy company. In the U.K., newer devices use the smart metering communications network.

Potentially an individual household could end up with three smart meters — one each for electricity, gas and water if they have all of those services and they’re supplied by separate energy companies.

What we’re not told is that it’s the spikes of pulsed energy and not the average power density, that can cause health effects. Studies claiming there are no health harms only use data based on average power levels over a set period of time.

In a letter sent by scientists and health professionals to the North Carolina Utilities Commission, they explain that smart meters and cell phones occupy similar frequency bands of the electromagnetic spectrum, meaning that cell phone research can apply to smart meter radiofrequency radiation (RFR).

Smart meter RFR consists of frequent, very intense but very brief pulses throughout the day.

Because smart meter exposure over a 24-hour period can be very prolonged (pulses can average 9,600 times a day), and because there is building evidence that the sharp, high-intensity pulses are particularly harmful, the cell phone study findings are applicable when discussing adverse health impacts from smart meters.

A recent study shows that accumulated electromagnetic frequency, or EMF exposures, such as those from Wi-Fi, smart meters, mobile phones, cell towers and other such devices, even at low levels, are causing oxidative stress that affects our organs, and damages our immune system.

Not only do smart meters pose a risk to our health they’re also at risk of cyberattacks.

Big Brother in your home

Contrary to what was initially touted, significant amounts of data are actively collected by smart meters, which can be shared with third parties. All without your knowledge.

Not only that, in the U.K., the government has been considering making changes to the Smart Energy Code to allow energy suppliers to switch off power to high-usage electrical devices such as electric vehicle chargers and heating systems in an emergency situation.

It’s not a very big leap from there to using your energy supply as leverage for more social control. Much along the lines of China’s “social credit system” that rewards actions that “build trust in society” and penalizes the opposite.

And let’s not forget about the connection of more and more “smart” electrical devices to the Internet of Things. Reading and recording your every move in an increasingly surveilled, controlled and authoritarian world.

Smart up or pay up!

The race to convert all analog meters to smart meters globally is well and truly on. Almost a million homes in the U.K. now face having their cheap overnight electricity tariffs switched off unless they install a smart meter.

A 2023 U.K. Parliamentary report warns that around 7 million early smart meters will cease to function as older mobile networks (2G and 3G) are switched off.

In Australia, the Australian Energy Market Commission proposed a draft rule to fast-track smart meter installations.

The vast majority of responses (from individuals) to the ensuing consultation raised objections to the proposal, which was rammed through regardless, yet again, favoring industry and government agendas over people’s wishes.

In Ireland, the push is on to persuade unwary consumers with exhortations of safety and money saving, to agree to the installation of smart meters.

In 2022, French people refusing the installation of a smart meter were threatened with financial penalties.

However, not one European country has yet achieved a 100% installation rate of smart meters. One has to ask why they are such a positive asset.

Industry eyes are now turning to Asia as the next big market to target. It is yet to be seen how compliant these new markets will be.

Originally published by Alliance for Natural Health International.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Alliance for Natural Health International

The Alliance for Natural Health International is a non-profit organization with a mission to safeguard and promote natural and sustainable approaches to regenerating and managing human health worldwide.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

For more:

Category:

Activism

Medical Journal Censorship is the Proximate Cause of the Covid Vaccine Catastrophe

https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/medical-journal-censorship-is-the?

Medical Journal Censorship Is The Proximate Cause of the Covid Vaccine Catastrophe

Here I document the brazen censoring behaviors of numerous major medical journals attempting to prop up the “safe and effective” narrative despite mountains of evidence to the contrary.

Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

Nov 11, 2024

In this post, I want to further the historical record of massive censoring actions by medical journals on the unprecedented adverse vaccine data of the Covid vaccines. A Midwestern Doctor, my colleague and friend, has done a masterful job of detailing that history in regard to small pox, polio, HPV and many other aspects of childhood vaccines. Never forget the Cutter incident, where officials covered up the fact they were distributing contaminated and deadly polio vaccines:

The Cutter incident was one of the worst pharmaceutical disasters in US history, and exposed several thousand children to live polio virus on vaccination.[3] The NIH Laboratory of Biologics Control, which had certified the Cutter polio vaccine, had received advance warnings of problems: in 1954, staff member Bernice Eddy had reported to her superiors that some inoculated monkeys had become paralyzed and provided photographs. William Sebrell, the director of NIH, rejected the report.[4]

The censoring of Eddy’s report led to:

  • 120,000 doses of polio vaccine that contained live polio virus.
  • 40,000 children recipients developed abortive poliomyelitis
  • 56 developed paralytic poliomyelitis—and of these, 5 children died from polio
  • exposures led to an epidemic of polio in the families and communities of the affected children, resulting in a further 113 people paralyzed and 5 deaths.

Thus, censorship of adverse vaccine data is not new but the deadly impacts of the polio vaccines is nowhere near the scope and scale of the current mRNA vaccine catastrophe.

Of those who, like me, started studying the dangers of Covid gene therapy “vaccines”, many then moved on to learn about the rest of the childhood vaccine schedule by reading “Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth.  (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Again, always look for those silver linings.

This article by Dr. Kory is a prime example.

It took millions of adverse reactions and deaths globally, but finally the tide has turned and many have awoken from their stupor to realize ‘vaccines’ are not ‘safe and effective.’

The article is long but critically highlights the insane censorship going on in the medical world.

I also highly recommend ‘Dissolving Illusions’ by Dr. Suzanne Humphries.  She went to primary sources and proves without a doubt the entire ‘vaccine’ paradigm is built on a house of cards.

Category:

Activism, vaccines