The drum on ineffective and dangerous EUA drugs needs to be beaten repeatedly until the medical tyranny ends, or the same thing will be repeated in the future.
Exclusive: Her Father Died After Hospital Gave Him Remdesivir, Morphine. Now She’s Raising Awareness.
In an interview with The Defender, Michigan native Teresa Cichewicz detailed how her father, Robert Anthony Michanowicz, went to the hospital because he had COVID-19 and had trouble breathing — and died three days later, after doctors administered remdesivir despite the family’s insistence that he not be given the drug.
Michigan native Teresa Cichewicz fondly recalls her father, Robert Anthony Michanowicz, as “the breath of fresh air that everyone liked to have around” and someone who “brought joy everywhere he went.”
In November 2021, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, Cichewicz was looking forward to Thanksgiving dinner with her father and her family. What she didn’t know was that it would be the last holiday she would celebrate with her father.
By Dec. 8, 2021, her father was dead — a victim of COVID-19 hospital protocols, Cichewicz said. (See link for article)
______________
**Comment**
It’s important to note that when Cichewicz and her mom requested ivermectin, doctors were patronizing, most probably due to the fact that public health ‘authorities’ maligned it from the beginning despite its long safety record, and were actually found by a court of law to have exceeded their authority in recommending against it.
They were also stonewalled by the hospital when they asked for medical records. It took SIX months to get them.
It’s important to note:
There were more than 500 deaths in thefirst year of remdesivir usage.
There have been 20 deaths in 19 years of ivermectin usage. Source
Cichewicz said that through the stories FormerFedsGroup has recorded, a list of 25 commonalities was developed chronicling how unvaccinated COVID-19 patients were treated in hospitals, includingisolation, lack of informed consent for treatments like remdesivir, alack of water, andinstances wherepatients were restrained to their beds.
______________
Before reading the following Paxlovid study author’s conservative statements and the reiteration that somehow “Paxlovid helps prevent severe COVID,” it’s imperative to remember that these researchers get grant money from the government, showing clear and present government collision with Big Pharma and research institutions.
Pfizer, the drug’s manufacturer, has been singled out has having a persistent history of being a habitual offender of criminal activity including illegal marketing, misrepresenting trial results, scientific fraud, concealing information about known dangers of their drugs, quietly funding groups lobbying for COVID shot mandates, giving their own employees a different batch of COVID shots that appear to be placebos, and colluding with the NIH.
An Israeli study on 100,000 people found paxlovid showed NO measurable benefit to patients between 40-65 years of age – the very people at risk. So who is it benefitting? Evidently, Big Pharma as it cost taxpayers more than $10 Billion.
COVID Rebound Occurs in 1 in 5 People Taking Paxlovid
By Dennis Thompson HealthDay Reporter
TUESDAY, Nov. 14, 2023 (HealthDay News) — Paxlovid helps prevent severe COVID-19, but it also might significantly increase a person’s risk of a rebound case, a new study confirms.
About 1 in 5 people taking Paxlovid recovered and tested negative for COVID, but later experienced a positive test result and started shedding live and potentially contagious virus.
“We found that the virologic rebound phenomenon was much more common than expected — in over 20% of people taking Paxlovid — and that individuals shed live virus when experiencing a rebound, implying the potential for transmission after initially recovering from the virus,” researcher Dr. Mark Siedner, an infectious disease clinician at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, said in a news release from Mass General Brigham.
The study runs counter to clinical trials that found only 1% to 2% of patients taking Paxlovid experienced virologic rebound, the researchers noted.
‘Perfectly Healthy’ 15-Month-Old Girl Dies Two Days After Routine Vaccination
Melody Rain Palombi-Malmgren died at age 15 months from cardiac arrest and organ failure, just two days after receiving the varicella, DTaP and Hib vaccines. Her mother is already working to help other families avoid the same fate.
A 15-month-old girl from Greenwood Lake, New York, died two days after receiving routine vaccinations during a wellness checkup, leaving her family searching for answers.
Melody Rain Palombi-Malmgren went into cardiac arrest and died on Oct. 19, after receiving three vaccines — for varicella, DTaP and Hib — at her 15-month wellness visit on Oct. 17 with the Herbert Kania Pediatric Group in Warwick, New York, according to News12 the Bronx.
“She was a perfectly healthy child,” her mother, Katherine Palombi, told News12. “I’m in complete shock.”
An autopsy confirmed recently that another baby met this same fate, and there are many more examples but we are continually being falsely told this is “rare,” despite the fact infant deaths due to vaccines are never listed on death certificates, but are listed as SIDS(sudden infant death syndrome) due to the lack of an ICD code (International Classification of Diseases), sanctioned by the CDC and the WHO. Coroners can’t choose to list a death as due to a vaccine even if they wanted to because no code exists for it. This problem exists in Lymeland as well. If a code doesn’t exist, then according to the CDC and mainstream medicine – the disease or symptom doesn’t exist either.
SIDS remains the leading cause of death among infants in the U.S. claiming 3,700 lives in 2015.
Dr. Viera Scheibner, one of the few scientists who has investigated SIDS and a possible link for vaccines, concludes that the answer to the cause of death is in the name: SIDS – Sudden Immunization Death Syndrome
CDC Reports Largest Infant Mortality Rate Increase in 20 Years
After falling since 2021, the U.S. infant mortality rate rose 3% during the 2021-2022 period studied by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Possible explanations included restricted healthcare access and economic instability during the COVID-19 pandemic were possible explanations.
The trend represents a sharp reversal, as between 2000 and 2020, infant deaths decreased by 21%.
One possible change between 2021 and 2020 was the availability of gene therapy products to prevent COVID-19 (vaccinations). The mRNA products were not authorized for pediatric use until June 2022, and only for children 6 months or older, so their direct impact on infant mortality likely was minimal (the study period looked at 2021-2022).
But the NCHS analysis focused on maternal and not infant risk factors: The outcome was infant death, the input or “intervention” was the mother’s vaccination status.
The COVID-19 vaccines were authorized for pregnant women in April 2021, so vaccination could have affected the survivability of their fetuses and newborns within the study period.
However, the NCHS found that Blacks were more than 3 times more likely than whites to refuse vaccination, and also experienced a much smaller increase in infant mortality.
Asian Americans were 56% more likely than whites to refuse vaccination and their mortality rates improved.
KRIS NEWBY: LYME DISEASE AND AMERICA’S SECRET BIOWEAPONS PROGRAMS
Investigative journalist Kris Newby has uncovered compelling evidence suggesting that secret bioweapons programs involving insects, conducted by the military and intelligence communities in the United States, may have led to the outbreak of Lyme disease.
In this interview with The New American, Newby discusses the key findings of her book Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons, which reveals shocking details about these covert programs and their potential connection to Lyme disease, which affects over half a million individuals annually. The interview delves into the history of bioweapons research, specifically the bug-borne bioweapons program of the 1950s and 1960s, where insects such as fleas, ticks, and mosquitoes were explored as carriers of deadly pathogens.
Willy Burgdorfer, a central figure in Newby’s research and the discoverer of Lyme disease, played a crucial role in this program. Burgdorfer, brought to Rocky Mountain Labs in 1951, researched turning arthropods into bioweapons that could be deployed covertly, affecting populations without destroying infrastructure. The writer highlights an alarming experiment involving the release of radioactive lone star ticks in coastal Virginia during the late 1960s, likely contributing to the spread of tick-borne diseases like Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever.
Newby stresses the need for transparency, the declassification of relevant records, and further scientific investigation into the genomes of pathogens carried by ticks.
The interview also raises concerns about the lack of oversight during the Cold War bioweapons programs and questions the current safety of biolabs, especially considering the proliferation of bio-level three and bio-level four labs since 9/11. Newby suggests that CRISPR technology, which allows genome manipulation, poses additional risks, and calls for increased regulation and transparency in the field of biodefense.
Scientists from the University of Bristol studied the naturally occurring electrostatic charges in animals. They reported their findings in a study entitled “Static electricity passively attracts ticks onto hosts.”¹
“Mammals, birds, and reptiles are known to carry appreciable net electrostatic charges, equivalent to surface potentials on the order of hundreds to tens of thousands of volts,” the authors wrote.
“Therefore, we hypothesize that their parasites, such as ticks, are passively attracted onto their surfaces by electrostatic forces acting across air gaps.” (An electrostatic charge is equivalent to walking on a floor or rubbing one’s head with a balloon.)
“These findings open a new dimension to our understanding of how ticks, and possibly many other terrestrial organisms, find and attach to their hosts or vectors.”
“Using statically charged rabbit fur and other charged materials in the lab, researchers were able to pull castor bean ticks (Ixodes ricinus) across gaps of air three to four times their body length,” writes Christie Wilcox in Science News.
This electrostatic force is so strong it can overcome gravity, enabling lateral or vertical lifting motions.
The investigators found that ticks used static electricity to help them launch and attach onto a passing human or animal.
“Our results show that electrostatically charged hosts passing within a few millimeters of a tick, but without making direct contact, can generate electric conditions that enhance the capacity of ticks to successfully bridge the gap and establish contact.”
“… strategies and technologies can now be developed to disrupt this electrical interaction. For example, the treatment of livestock, pets, or human clothing with anti-static coatings may well reduce the rates of tick infestation in these contexts.”
References:
England SJ, Lihou K, Robert D. Static electricity passively attracts ticks onto hosts. Curr Biol. Jul 24 2023;33(14):3041-3047 e4. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.021
I’m skeptical of anti-static coatings as they might be just as toxic as a tick bite. Teflon is a perfect example.
But the topic of “ticks flying” is an important one and one that is flat-out denied by researchers. Of course, the definition of “flying” is also important. While ticks do not have wings that allow them to actually fly in the common sense of the word, anyone with a brain that has experience with ticks understands that the wind can blow them from point A to point B, and they have been known to drop down from trees.
Both of these realities are denied by researchers – despite reality.
Many are also unaware that ticks are in caves, on beaches & picnic benches, the cracks in sidewalks, and on rocks.
Birds, mammals, and reptiles transport ticks everywhere and to say otherwise is foolish.
Journalist and C.B.R. Chair in Politics, Censorship, and Free Speech at the University of Austin, Michael Shellenberger, weighs in on his latest reporting on an “anti-disinformation group” called Cyber Threat Intelligence League (CTIL).
US And UK Military Contractors Created Sweeping Plan For Global Censorship In 2018, New Documents ShowWhistleblower makes trove of new documents available to Public and Racket, showing the birth of the Censorship Industrial Complex in reaction to Brexit and Trump election in 2016
US military contractor Pablo Breuer (left), UK defense researcher Sara-Jayne “SJ” Terp (center), and Chris Krebs, former director of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (DHS-CISA)
A whistleblower has come forward with an explosive new trove of documents, rivaling or exceeding the Twitter Files and Facebook Files in scale and importance. They describe the activities of an “anti-disinformation” group called the Cyber Threat Intelligence League, or CTIL, that officially began as the volunteer project of data scientists and defense and intelligence veterans but whose tactics over time appear to have been absorbed into multiple official projects, including those of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
The CTI League documents offer the missing link answers to key questions not addressed in the Twitter Files and Facebook Files. Combined, they offer a comprehensive picture of the birth of the “anti-disinformation” sector, or what we have called the Censorship Industrial Complex.
The whistleblower’s documents describe everything from the genesis of modern digital censorship programs to the role of the military and intelligence agencies, partnerships with civil society organizations and commercial media, and the use of sock puppet accounts and other offensive techniques.
“Lock your shit down,” explains one document about creating “your spy disguise.”
Another explains that while such activities overseas are “typically” done by “the CIA and NSA and the Department of Defense,”censorship efforts “against Americans” have to be done using private partners because the government doesn’t have the “legal authority.” In other words, the government is fully aware that these activities are illegal for them to do so they outsourced to private companies similarly to how they skirted the ‘gain of function’ moratorium by simply outsourcing it to China to be done.
The whistleblower alleges that a leader of CTI League, a “former” British intelligence analyst, was “in the room” at the Obama White House in 2017 when she received the instructions to create a counter-disinformation project to stop a “repeat of 2016.”
Over the last year, Public, Racket, congressional investigators, and others have documented the rise of the Censorship Industrial Complex, a network of over 100 government agencies and nongovernmental organizations that work together to urge censorship by social media platforms and spread propaganda about disfavored individuals, topics, and whole narratives.
The US Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Information Security Agency (CISA) has been the center of gravity for much of the censorship, with the National Science Foundation financing the development of censorship and disinformation tools and other federal government agencies playing a supportive role. (See link for article)
__________________
**Comment**
I believe the same tactics have been deployed in Lymeland for decades. This topic should concern us all and we should demand government transparency and an investigation on this issue and vote for those who promise to uphold our inalienable rights, because believe it or not the situation could get much, much worse.
SUMMARY:
Despite the overwhelming evidence of government sponsored censorship, black holes have existed in the timeline, including the author(s) of the plan, until now.
New documents, training videos, presentations and internal messages which rival the Twitter Files and Facebook Files in importance, show that the creation of CTIL began in 2018.
In 2019, US and UK military and intelligence contractors (including DHS) led by a former UK defense researcher, Sara-Jayne “SJ” Terp, developed the sweeping censorship framework. These contractors co-led CTIL, which partnered with CISA in the spring of 2020.
Work done by these groups led to masking censorship within cybersecurity institutions, which pressured social media platforms to stop all dissenting opinions and to stop content from going viral.
Calling it the “Hogwarts school for misinformation and disinformation,”they saw themselves as superheroes. CTIL needed programmers to pull apart info from Facebook and YouTube. For Twitter they created Python code to scrape data.
CTIL created a law enforcement channel for reporting disfavored content and did research on those posting anti-lockdown hashtags – keeping a spreadsheet with details from their Twitter bios.
CTIL engaged in offensive operations to influence public opinion:
During CTI League brainstorming sessions for “counter-messaging for things like encouraging people to wear masks,” statements were given such as “Repetition is truth.”
“You’re not trying to get people to believe lies most of the time,” Terp said. “Most of the time, you’re trying to change their belief sets. And in fact, really deeper than that, you’re trying to change, to shift their internal narratives … the set of stories that are your baseline for your culture.”
Interestingly, experts are now stating that the COVID injections are changing the personality of many recipients which has been equated with lobotomy due to the spike protein, along with other COVID measures represents an intentional attack on the human hippocampus where autobiographical memory and individuality originate – ostensibly making people suggestible, forgetful, compliant, and unable to think critically and creatively. Source
The same report also called for a form of “pre-bunking,” to “preemptively inoculate a vulnerable population against messaging,” suggesting that DHS-funded Information Sharing and Analysis Centers could be used to promote such pre-bunking.
The whistleblower states CTIL’s ultimate goal “was to become part of the federal government.” In our weekly meetings, they made it clear that they were building these organizations within the federal government, and if you built the first iteration, we could secure a job for you.”
Roughly 12-20 active people involved in CTIL worked at the FBI or CISA.
Terp and colleagues wrote AMITT by adapting a cybersecurity framework developed by MITRE, a major defense and intelligence contractor that has an annual budget of $1 to $2 billion in government funding.
Terp later used AMITT to develop the DISARM framework, which the World Health Organization then employed in “countering anti-vaccination campaigns across Europe.”
The AMITT framework calls for discrediting individuals as a necessary prerequisite of demanding censorship against them. It also calls for training influencers to spread messages and for getting banks to cut off financial services to people who organize rallies or events.
The documents give a clear picture of a highly coordinated and sophisticated effort by the US and UK governments to build a domestic censorship effort and influence operations similar to the ones they have used in foreign countries. It also strongly suggests the framework was originally created by military contractors.
Journalist Matt Taibbi has already been defamed and threatened with perjury charges with a five-year prison sentence, presented the documents to Congressional investigators on Thursday, November 30 and promised to make them available to the public. Go here and scroll to approx. 16:30 to hear Shallenberger’s 5 minute testimony, followed by Taibbi’s testimony.
The NY Post reported on the Congressional investigation and questions if free speech will triumph in time to prevent the feds from secretly rigging the 2024 election. It also reported that journalist, Shellenberger urged Congress to abolish CISA.
Sadly, federal censorship could still run rampant until the Supreme Court rules on the government and social media censorship case Missouri v Biden, (now called Murthy v. Missouri) which is perhaps the biggest 1st Amendment ruling since the 1971 Pentagon Papers case.
The whistleblower told the journalists that CTI League leaders did not discuss their potential violation of the First Amendment.
“The ethos was that if we get away with it, it’s legal, and there were no First Amendment concerns because we have a ‘public-private partnership’ — that’s the word they used to disguise those concerns. ‘Private people can do things public servants can’t do, and public servants can provide the leadership and coordination,’” the whistleblower said.
FBI and CISA did not respond to the journalist’s request for comment. Gee, I wonder why?
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 