https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/true-crime-as-true-lyme-tick-bite-leads-to-murder-suicide

True Crime as True Lyme: Tick Bite Leads to Murder-Suicide

Investigative Journalist at Trial Site News | In this to change this.
Jul. 24, 2024, 4:30 p.m.

Tortured by Lyme disease, a young man killed his friend and himself. He is not alone.

MARY BETH PFEIFFER

For decades, Lyme disease physicians have seen a small share of late-stage patients with symptoms far beyond the physical ravages of a tick bite. These patients, estimated to be 1 percent of chronic Lyme psychiatric cases, manifest brain disorders so intractable that they become violent, even homicidal.    

Now, a new article in the science journal Heliyon validates these observations and reveals possible mechanisms driving them. It tells the horrific story of a 32-year-old man whose tickborne infection at age 14—one of several—went unrecognized until it was unresponsive to treatment. Failed by short-course antibiotics that mainstream medical guidance swears by, he descended into substance abuse, as many chronic Lyme patients do, to ease his anxiety, depression, and physical pain.

Finally, in the delusional throes of PCP withdrawal, he walked next door, impulsively killed his best friend, stabbed the friend’s father and brother, and turned the knife on himself. He died on a bathroom floor, his mother having tried in vain to stanch two neck wounds.

All of this is a likely outcome of poorly treated Lyme disease under medical protocols that leave even early-treated patients sick—36 percent at six months and 5 percent at fifteen years. While animal studies and a handful of post-mortem reports have illustrated the failure of recommended treatments to quell Lyme disease—using antibiotics in insufficient strength or duration—this study goes further.

For the first time, based on analysis of autopsy samples, it shows both how persisting infection combined with chemical brain changes from substance abuse may have contributed to a disastrous outcome.  (See link for article and study)

________________

**Comment**

It’s stories like these that also make me highly critical of any federal attempt at rectification.

This story is a perfect example of how many go undiagnosed for so long they become recalcitrant.  The picture becomes muddier yet as they seek out ways to simply cope – and in this case turn to harmful drugs which adds a whole other dimension to an already complex picture.

The study thankfully was led by none other than Dr. Robert Bransfield, a literal icon in the world of Lyme and psychiatry.  He’s single-handedly written pretty much all that is known about how Lyme/MSIDS affects the brain.  Even though since 2015 the APA has recommended that evals for mental illness include assessments of ‘locally endemic infectious diseases such as Lyme disease,’ be done, they typically aren’t done.

The study showed that the patient had attached ticks on him at least fifteen times.  At 14 he developed the hallmark summer flu-like illness Lyme is known to cause that his pediatrician considered to be caused by a virus despite an attached tick!  His brain was found to have major inflammation and quinolinic acid – both of which are common in late Lyme disease.  PCP, the illegal drug he took reduces quinolinic acid.

The patient sought but was denied a bed in a substance abuse rehabilitation facility.  PCP withdrawal is known to cause fear, agitation, anxiety, irritability, hallucinations and flashbacks.

For more:

Lyme IACI, pronounced “Lyme eye-ACK-ee” is the latest fantasy dreamt up by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine – the congressionally chartered organization that serves as the ‘collective’ scientific national academy of the U.S., which proudly deploys the climate, health, and equity propaganda pushed by globalists.  The sponsors of the organization are none other than:

AstraZeneca
Burroughs Wellcome Fund
Grantham Foundation
JPB Foundation​
McCall MacBain Foundation
Rockefeller Foundation

Are you getting this yet?

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/

Inquiry to the Deputy Director of the Vector-Borne Diseases Division at the CDC

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
Jul 31, 2024

Notice to everyone who has signed this petition:

The following so-called “National Committee” has been established turning persistent Lyme symptoms into a new acronym: Lyme Infection-Associated Chronic Illness (Lyme IACI)

Medscape

‘Doesn’t Fit Anything I Trained for’: National Committee Examines Treatment for Chronic Illness Following Lyme Disease

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/doesnt-fit-anything-i-trained-national-committee-examines-2024a1000dru

So now, Chronic Lyme will be swept under the rug for more decades to come despite the mountain of evidence that we have been dealing with an antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug!

I don’t think this committee is looking to solve (expose) the chronic Lyme epidemic …. it seems more likely this is an opportunity to exploit the chronically infected with money making pharmaceuticals to treat the symptoms of an antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug.

“Lyme IACI” conveniently sweeps chronic Lyme under the rug.

Please see the email below addressed to Dr. Ben Beard of the CDC with carbon copy to all members of this committee. I ask that everyone demand a response from Beard. You can copy all email addresses below and send a private email or post a comment to the NASEM Committee’s website: https://www8.nationalacademies.org/pa/feedback.aspx?type=project&key=HMD-HSP-23-07

Inquiry to Ben Beard:

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “cbb0@cdc.gov” <cbb0@cdc.gov>
Cc: “jjohnson@genevausa.org” <jjohnson@genevausa.org>, “theerhisamariee@gmail.com” <theerhisamariee@gmail.com>, “jaucott@jhmi.edu” <jaucott@jhmi.edu>, “cbb0@cdc.gov” <cbb0@cdc.gov>, “jraitt1@stanford.edu” <jraitt1@stanford.edu>, “dclauw@med.umich.edu” <dclauw@med.umich.edu>, “john.leong@tufts.edu” <john.leong@tufts.edu>, “avindra.nath@nih.gov” <avindra.nath@nih.gov>, “charles.chiu@ucsf.edu” <charles.chiu@ucsf.edu>, “elliot.cowan@partnersindiagnostics.com” <elliot.cowan@partnersindiagnostics.com>, “beth.jaworski@nih.hhs.gov” <beth.jaworski@nih.hhs.gov>, “roger@lundquist.org” <roger@lundquist.org>, “rachele.hendricks.sturrup@duke.edu” <rachele.hendricks.sturrup@duke.edu>, “info@lymebiobank.org” <info@lymebiobank.org>, “lorrainejohnson@outlook.com” <lorrainejohnson@outlook.com>, “wendyadams1@gmail.com” <wendyadams1@gmail.com>, “Leith.States@hhs.gov” <Leith.States@hhs.gov>, “tindall.matt@gmail.com” <tindall.matt@gmail.com>, “stacie.hudgens@clinoutsolutions.com” <stacie.hudgens@clinoutsolutions.com>, “raymond_dattwyler@nymc.edu” <raymond_dattwyler@nymc.edu>, “timothy.sellati@globallymealliance.org” <timothy.sellati@globallymealliance.org>, “nklimas@nova.edu” <nklimas@nova.edu>, “kester@genevausa.org” <kester@genevausa.org>, “nicole@nicolemalachowski.com” <nicole@nicolemalachowski.com>, “marcom@genevausa.org” <marcom@genevausa.org>, “stephen.gluckman@pennmedicine.upenn.edu” <stephen.gluckman@pennmedicine.upenn.edu>, “epocratesMedia@athenahealth.com” <epocratesMedia@athenahealth.com>, “epocrates@athenahealth.com” <epocrates@athenahealth.com>
Date: 07/31/2024 7:40 AM EDT
Subject: Inquiry to the Deputy Director of the Vector-Borne Diseases Division at the CDC

Charles B Beard
Deputy Division Director, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Dear Dr. Beard,

In 1991 the Lyme disease organism, Borrelia burgdorferi, was grown from the cerebrospinal fluid of patient Vicki Logan at the Centers for Disease Control in Fort Collins, Colorado despite prior treatment with intravenous antibiotics. The patient died when the insurer refused additional IV antibiotics. I have attached a copy of Logan’s positive culture report for your review:

Logan CDC Fort Collins Positive CSF Culture Report (Personal Dropbox storage area)
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/agca4ynn9ok2ykgw6484q/Logan-CDC-Fort-Collins-Positive-CSF-Culture-Report.JPG?rlkey=krhiecm1xdmqs6ubhvjxuzzeo&dl=0

In 1995 the following publication identified treatment-resistant neuroborreliosis:
 
European Neurology 1995
Seronegative Chronic Relapsing Neuroborreliosis
https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/117104

In 2018 all patients were culture positive even after multiple years on antibiotics so there was no relief from current antimicrobials. Some of these patients had taken as many as eleven different types of antibiotics. Barbour-Stoener-Kelly (BSK) medium was used and is the same complex medium used in the NIH funded Klempner antibiotic trials.

Persistent Borrelia Infection in Patients with Ongoing Symptoms of Lyme Disease
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/6/2/33

A recently published autopsy study for a young Lyme patient who committed suicide identifies chronic Lyme disease in the patient’s brain which was responsible for his neurological symptoms.

Concurrent Infection of the Human Brain with Multiple Borrelia Species
Published in MDPI Nov. 29, 2023
https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/23/16906

Excerpt:

The diverse strategies used by spirochetes to avoid the host immune system and persist in the host include active immune suppression, induction of immune tolerance, phase and antigenic variation, intracellular seclusion, changing of morphological and physiological state in varying environments, formation of biofilms and persistent forms, and, importantly, incursion into immune-privileged sites such as the brain. Invasion of immune-privileged sites allows the spirochetes to not only escape from the host immune system but can also reduce the efficacy of antibiotic therapy. 

In addition, there are 700 peer reviewed publications identifying persistent infection and more evidence of seronegative disease.

Question:

As Deputy Director of the Vector-Borne Diseases Division at the CDC, why has all the evidence indicating Borrelia as an antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug been ignored for decades?

A response to this inquiry is requested.

Please hit reply all when responding.

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH

_______________

**Comment**

When reading the Medscape article, please notice the following:

The committee will not make recommendations on specific approaches to diagnosis and treatment when it issues a report in early 2025 but will instead present “consensus findings” on treatment for chronic illness associated with Lyme disease, including recommendations for advancing treatment.

There have been only a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted on what the committee is calling Lyme Infection-Associated Chronic Illness (Lyme IACI) for now, and no National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded RCTs in the past 20 years or so. It’s an area void of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, void of any consensus on the off-label use of medications, and without any current standard of care or proven mechanisms and pathophysiology, said John Aucott, MD, director of the Johns Hopkins Medicine Lyme Disease Clinical Research Center, Baltimore, one of the invited speakers at a public meeting held by the NASEM in Washington, DC, in July.”

The best way to look at this illness is not from the silos of infectious disease or the silos of rheumatology; you have to look across disciplines,” Aucott, also associate professor of medicine in the Division of Rheumatology, told the committee. “The story doesn’t fit anything I trained for in my infectious disease fellowship. Even today, I’d posit that PTLD is like an island — it’s still not connected to a lot of the mainstream of medicine.”

COVID showed the world the devastating impact of ‘consensus-based medicine,’ which a report has deemed ‘shocking and immortal.’ In this Communist-type paradigm doctors are told by bureaucrats how to treat, what they can use to treat, and what they can’t use to treat.  Anything outside the lines of this monolith simply aren’t allowed.  Doctors who dare to think for themselves are persecuted and ostracized – with the full weight of the government pressing down upon them –  often times losing their medical license.

This is the world Lyme literate doctors (LLMDs) have lived in for forty years.

The article also regurgitates that only 10-20% go on to suffer with persistent symptoms after treatment, when the actual percentages are approximately 60% as many are not diagnosed or treated until much later – often years later.

Lyme/MSIDS will never fit into RCTs because there are too many variables to fit into a nice four-cornered research box.  Many never test positive on the CDC-2-tiered testing, many never get an EM rash, numerous coinfections are involved, not to mention the fact there are multiple strains of borrelia that testing will not pick up, and symptoms are wildly variable.  No two patients look alike.

http://  Approx. 50 Min

Dr. Elena Frid on Lyme/MSIDS/PANS/PANDAS

Ticktective Podcast

May, 2024

Dana Parish – TICKTECTIVE at the Bay Area Lyme Foundation interviews Dr. Elena Frid how Lyme disease, PANS, and PANDAS affect children’s ability to function at school and home. Dr. Frid shares her expertise in treating complex cases involving autoimmune conditions, Lyme disease with co-infections, and PANS/PANDAS, which often lead to neurological issues. In the podcast, she explains how she uses advanced diagnostic tools and her clinical expertise to distinguish between idiopathic and organic causes of various neurological disorders. Tune in to gain valuable insights from Dr. Frid’s experience and learn more about these challenging conditions.

For more:

https://www.activistpost.com/2024/06/the-connection-between-toxic-mold-parasites-emfs.html

The Connection Between Toxic Mold, Parasites & EMFs

By Rosanne Lindsay, Naturopath

Updated from February 2022

Living in the material world means an attachment to wireless technology. When does an attachment become an addiction?

Can you do without a cellphone? Watching TV? Scrolling social media? How much time in a day does wireless occupy? What do you consider excessive use? Do you experience withdrawal symptoms (moodiness, irritability, depression) by going without? Would you consent to the imposition of technology at the risk of harming your health and potentially all biological life?

Image by <a href="https://pixabay.com/users/mohamed_hassan-5229782/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=3840285">Mohamed Hassan</a> from <a href="https://pixabay.com//?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=3840285">Pixabay</a>Unfortunately, the emotional and physical effects of invisible electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs) are not listed on the package. If you have two or more of the following devices; cell phones, computers, GPS, Smart appliances, electric cars, wearables, and Smart™ TVs, or electric cars, then there are symptoms you may never hear about.

The manufacturer does not disclose that EMFs activate the hidden world of yeast, fungus, mold, mycoplasma, Lyme spirochetes, and protozoan parasites to unhealthy levels in the human body.

The consequence of WiFi is a rise in chronic infections that can be misdiagnosed.

The industries responsible for creating this silent connection between EMFs and infection fail to take responsibility. The line between what will protect you, and what will not, has never been less clearly defined.

As 5G towers become compatible with 6G, 7G and beyond, who is responsible for the consequences?

Symptoms from exposure to mold toxins include:

  • Fatigue
  • Weakness
  • Muscle cramps
  • Headache and pain
  • Light sensitivity
  • Sinus problems
  • Abdominal pain
  • Diarrhea
  • Joint pain and stiffness
  • Cognitive issues
  • Mood dysregulation
  • Temperature regulation or dysregulation problems
  • Excessive thirst
  • Increased urination
  • Nervous system issues

(See link for article & videos)

The parasitic origin of cancer is not a new concept.  J. Collins Warren, M.D. wrote about it all the way back in 1891 in the Boston Medical and Surgical Journal.  A bacterial origin has also been considered and at one time cancer was considered infectious.  Per usual, many of these theories are trumped and then forgotten due to powerful lobbyists for Big Pharma.

http://

In Vitro Experiment

Dr. Klinghardt shows that unprotected mold multiplies and releases 600 times more potent biotoxins than mold that is protected from electromagnetic fields (EMF).  Klinghardt postulates that mold, mycotoxin, parasites including worms, and Lyme reacts more defensively when exposed to EMF and that in 2011, the amount of cell phone radiation in a cubic inch of air is several million times higher than it had been a decade before that, and it’s only creased even more now.

Helminths or worms can live in the intestinal tract urinary tract, bladder, or bloodstream and cause a variety of illness from malnutrition to organ failure and flukes (flat, leaf-shaped worms with suckers or hooks) are responsible for a majority of all bladder and liver cancer in endemic regions. 

Go here for a FREE Ebook as well as common signs and symptoms of parasites.

Scientists have known for decades that helminths can turn healthy cells into diseased cells.T

Tumors analyzed for pathology often come back showing worms and parasites.

For more:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/hhs-declaration-of-emergency-bird-flu-pcr-testing-eua-vaccines/

HHS ‘Declaration of Emergency’ for Bird Flu Paves Way for PCR Testing and More EUA Vaccines, Critics Say

Public health authorities have taken a series of actions in recent weeks to facilitate the possible future distribution of bird flu testing and vaccines, even as the CDC maintains the current public health risk from bird flu is low.

chicken and pcr test

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) this month issued a declaration of emergency, announcing that some flu viruses — including H5N1 bird flu — could cause a pandemic and threaten national security.

The announcement by HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra amended a 2013 section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act, which allows the agency to extend the availability of medical countermeasures to pandemic influenza A viruses, including the currently circulating H5N1 strain of bird flu.

Prior to the amendment, the declaration covered only the previous H7N9 strain of bird flu.

The announcement specified that current circumstances justify the emergency use authorization (EUA) of in vitro diagnostics such as RT-PCR tests to detect bird flu and other pandemic influenza A viruses.

“This paves the way for more EUA vaccines, devices and products to possibly be effective against these new and unknown viruses,” attorney Ray Flores told The Defender.

He added:

“Just as EUA PCR tests exaggerated the COVID-19 pandemic, the detection of avian influenza and influenza A viruses with pandemic potential via unlicensed PCR tests is destined to justify lockdowns, masking, invasive nasal swabs, and wide-scale vaccination with experimental mRNA technology.

“The stage is set for RT-PCR tests to take the pivotal role of determining false positives with amped up cycle thresholds designed to declare asymptomatic, otherwise healthy people to be infected — just like last time.”

Under the FD&C Act, HHS can take steps to facilitate countermeasures only after the secretary of either the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Defense or HHS determines there is an emergency or potential for an emergency involving a chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear agent that may threaten the national or health security of U.S. citizens.

After that determination, the HHS secretary can declare that existing circumstances justify an EUA that would allow the FDA to authorize previously unlicensed drugs or vaccines or previously unapproved uses of licensed drugs.

The amendment covers animal or human flu viruses — circulating in wild birds, humans, or domestic animals — that may infect humans, may have caused pandemics in the past or may mutate to cause a pandemic in humans for which they have no prior immunity.

Becerra said in the amendment that the bird flu viruses may pose a public health threat, despite acknowledging that it “may initially only be occasionally transmitted to or between humans.” However, he added that bird flu viruses may “have the potential to become highly transmissible in humans and can cause significant morbidity and mortality.”

The currently circulating H5N1 virus is one in a series of bird flu viruses that pose such a threat, although the virus is not easily transmissible to humans and none of the human cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) involved severe disease, the announcement said.

“We cannot be sure,” Becerra said, that the mild cases associated with dairy cattle represent the full spectrum of the disease, “nor can we be assured that the virus will not mutate to cause more severe disease and/or to become more transmissible.”

The CDC reports the current public health risk is low and that surveillance shows “no indicators of unusual influenza activity in people, including avian influenza A(H5).”

There have been a total of 14 reported human cases since 2022, according to the agency. Four occurred after exposure to dairy cows, 10 after exposure to poultry and none have been serious.

Hand in glove holding vaccine

The Vaccine Safety Project

AMA updates vaccine codes for potential EUA vaccine

The day after Becerra’s announcement, on July 19, the American Medical Association (AMA) announced an update to its Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to include a new code for bird flu vaccines, should they receive EUA from the FDA.

CPT codes are used by providers to report healthcare procedures and services and to update medical records.

The AMA said it is publishing the code update now “to ensure electronic systems across the U.S. health care system are prepared in advance for the potential FDA authorization.”

The update included new codes for administering the potential bird flu vaccine to both children and adults.

The new code is for a cell-culture-derived vaccine adjuvanted for intramuscular use, which refers to an inactivated flu virus grown in cultured mammalian cells.

Cell-culture vaccines are a newer technology developed to replace the traditional egg-based vaccine production for flu vaccines. It is said to be cleaner, faster and more scalable than its predecessor.

Vaccine producer contracted to produce millions of doses of bird flu vaccines

The creation of the codes also follows an agreement, announced May 30, between the U.S. government and CSL Seqirus — one of the largest vaccine producers in the world — to complete 4.8 million doses of a “pre-pandemic vaccine that is well-matched to the H5 of the currently circulating H5N1 strain,” as part of the U.S. National Pre-Pandemic Influenza Vaccine Stockpile program.

HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response Dawn O’Connell told reporters some of those shots could be available as early as this month, Reuters reported.

This was the fourth contract awarded to CSL Seqirus under a multi-year agreement with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), which largely pays for the vaccines.

Marc Lacey, CSL Seqirus global executive director for the pandemic, said in the press release that the CDC maintains that bird flu poses a low risk to public health. However, “This agreement, building upon prior agreements with BARDA, will help support the U.S. government’s ability to respond swiftly in the event that the current avian flu situation changes.”

Seqirus manufactures the vaccines in Holly Springs, North Carolina, at a $1 billion facility built in 2009 and opened in 2013 through a partnership between Novartis and BARDA that was in part facilitated by grants and tax incentives from local government.

CSL Seqirus’ parent company acquired Novartis’ facility in 2014.

The facility is the largest producer of cell-based vaccines in the world, with the capacity to deliver up to 150 million flu vaccines within six months of an emergency pandemic declaration. Then it could continue to produce large quantities of vaccines.

Their massive vaccine production capacity, the company said, is dependent on continued research and development along with seasonal vaccine manufacturing, which provides a “warm base” for pandemic production. That means the production of seasonal vaccines makes it possible for the company to maintain the materials and personnel necessary to produce massive vaccine quantities.

CSL Seqirus’ H5N8 avian influenza vaccine received the European Union’s marketing authorization in April. The vaccine requires a two-dose series, with the second dose administered at least three weeks after the first.

The European Commission Health Emergency Preparedness and Response (HERA) program in June announced the purchase of 665,000 doses of CSL Seqirus’ H5N8 avian influenza vaccine, with an option to acquire another 40 million doses over the next four years.

Finland already plans to offer the CSL Seqirus H5N8 bird flu vaccine to approximately 10,000 people deemed at high risk of exposure to the virus.

WHO announces project to fast-track mRNA bird flu vaccines

The World Health Organization (WHO) today announced a new project to speed up the “development and accessibility” of an mRNA bird flu vaccine for manufacturers in low- and middle-income countries as part of the mRNA Technology Transfer Programme.

The same program was used to help develop and transfer the mRNA platform for COVID-19 to the developing world.

Earlier this month, BARDA awarded $176 million to Moderna to develop and test its pre-pandemic mRNA vaccine against H5N1.

Late-stage testing would begin in 2025, pending results from the Phase 1/2 trial of five different mRNA vaccine options testing on about 1,500 people that concluded last week.

The contract includes options to speed up the development timeline if there is an increase in the number of human cases, the severity of the virus or if human-to-human transmission becomes possible, Reuters reported.

The U.S. government is also in talks with Pfizer about possibly supporting its development of an mRNA vaccine targeting the H5 family of bird flu viruses, according to the Financial Times.

‘Mock-up’ vaccines allow industry to roll out experimental shots with little testing

Becerra’s declaration offered a brief overview of previous bird flu viruses that threatened public health, citing the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic and the H7N9, in 2013-2014.

High mortality rates allegedly associated with these strains were offered as justification for concern that although the current bird flu strain does not easily transmit to humans and is not particularly virulent, it could become so.

Discussing this hypothesis and the possible reasons behind it with Children’s Health Defense (CHD) Chief Scientific Officer Brian Hooker, Ph.D., on a recent episode of his CHD.TV show “Doctors & Scientists,” internist Dr. Meryl Nass said:

“The people who make their money by warning us about pandemics, by selling pandemic products, people who get promotions because they have developed pandemic vaccines or been involved in some way in tests or other, the pandemic industry has been very interested for over 20 years in figuring out ways to give experimental vaccines that they develop very quickly to an entire population without having to test them. Because if you test them, it takes months longer before you can give them out, and your pandemic is likely to be over at that point.

“You need to roll them out fast if you’re going to use them. And if you’re going to cause a nation to spend millions or billions of dollars buying them, you’re going to have to come up with them quickly.”

Nass explained how the industry can quickly create and roll out new pandemic vaccines in the U.S. by creating “mock-up” vaccines that are later used as platforms for new vaccines. Drugmakers use existing vaccines as substrates and can insert new antigens into them when a new virus strain appears in what Nass called a “plug and play” approach to making new vaccines.

Nass reviewed the three currently approved bird flu vaccines, raising serious questions about the small size of the clinical trials and serious adverse events in the trials, including fatalities.

For example, she said, Sanofi Pasteur’s bird flu vaccine was licensed in 2007 for the national stockpile based on a clinical trial of only 103 subjects. One of those subjects died and three others experienced a serious adverse event, including cancer.

In trials for GSK’s vaccine, licensed in 2013, 0.5% of subjects experienced serious adverse events, including thyroid cancer and cerebral vascular events. In the trials for Audenz, CSL Seqirus’ H5N1 vaccine, serious adverse events occurred in all age groups, including deaths in older adults.

These vaccines, she said, are prototypes for vaccines that could be emergency authorized for the current virus.

According to Nass, the media are telling people — referring to a May 2024 article in The Guardian — “the only question is when do we pull the trigger on these vaccines?”Nass added that the U.S. government in May relaxed the rules for handling bird viruses so they could be examined in regular hospital labs rather than high-security labs.

“So the U.S. government is trying to imply that this is a deadly virus, but they’re acknowledging it is basically a nothing burger virus for humans at this time,” she said.

However, she warned, the vaccines themselves could be dangerous.