Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

Is the Government Weaponizing Data? AFD Files Injunction Against COVID Shots, DOJ Declares Vax Mandates Are a Go

https://standforhealthfreedom.com/federal/aflds-injunction/

Is the Government Weaponizing Data?

America’s Frontline Doctors files injunction against Covid Vax; Department of Justice Declares Vax Mandates are a Go

The Covid pandemic is built on data. Every action by our government in the name of public health relies upon it. Cited numbers of Covid infections and deaths justify everything from ever-fluctuating mask guidance, to how close we can stand next to each other, to how many people can sit in a restaurant, to whether our family and friends bump elbows with us, give us a hug, or wave from a distance. Data is driving what conditions our children will have when schools reopen (or choose not to). It drives whether we can be with our loved ones who are hospitalized or in nursing care.

Clearly the integrity of data about Covid-19 transmission and symptom severity should be of the highest importance to our elected officials. The people who represent us in government are creating or accepting policy that is changing the structure of our society, and shaping our future by affecting the mental and physical health of our children. Citizens are told to rely upon the data curated by our government to make decisions in our daily lives, including medical decisions.

Our current Administration relies on data for vaccine policy. President Biden is calling for citizens to go door-to-door to promote uptake of vaccines that are not approved by the FDA. And now, with the backing of the Department of Justice, the White House is encouraging businesses, government, schools, and health providers to deny services, access, and employment to those who are not vaccinated.

All of these actions and mandates rest on the foundation of Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA). i EUAs were codified in 2003, as part of the George W. Bush administration’s Project Bioshield, which sought to address anticipated bioterrorist attack threats. Over the next 17 years, EUAs were issued by the FDA dozens of times in response to threats like Anthrax, Ebola, Swine Flu, and Zika. ii

Since January, 2020, there has been a massive surge in EUA use. Over 600 EUAs paved the way for Covid drugs, tests, PPE, and medical devices. iii

Underlying all EUAs is the legal necessity for a declaration of emergency. Without that declaration, every subsequent action ceases to be legal.

There is No Emergency

In general, a drug or device will not go to market without FDA approval. EUAs bypass lengthy safety and efficacy studies, in the name of an urgent threat. The EUA provision of Project Bioshield anticipated novel biological threats, for which the benefit of swift drug development and access would outweigh the risk of rapid transmission of a biological agent.

Under the law, EUAs require only a declaration by the HHS Secretary of a public health emergency, or a significant potential thereof, which is a threat to national security. iv In 2020, HHS Secretary Alex Azar declared a state of emergency due to covid on January 31. It was renewed in April, July and October, and again January 2021. Our current Secretary Xavier Becerra renewed the public health emergency again in April and July, 2021. v

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) filed suit on July 19,2021 with the primary focus of stopping these declarations. The group aims to halt the use of covid vaccines under EUAs, namely Janssen, Moderna and Pfizer. AFLDS further wants to prevent FDA approval of the vaccines for children, for those who have already been infected with SARS-CoV-2, and any citizen unable to give “truly voluntary, informed consent.”

The suit is supported by robust statutory, legal and factual bases. Studies are presented that challenge the public health narrative and government asserted health and safety data for the novel vaccines. The suit asserts that there is no serious or life-threatening disease, that the vaccines are not effective, that vaccine risks outweigh benefits, there are available approved alternatives, and that health professionals and the general public do not have adequate information to allow for informed choice by individuals. The essence of the suit is, safety data that is crucial for informed consent has been obscured, manipulated, or omitted.

Whistleblower: 45,000 Deaths Caused by the Vaccine

One of the most striking revelations in the suit is an expert opinion that adverse events reported in VAERS are woefully deflated. As of the filing of the suit on July 19, 2021, the number of deaths reported to VAERS associated with covid vaccines was over 9,000. Whistleblower testimony by an expert in health data analytics estimated the number of deaths within 3 days of vaccination exceeds reports to VAERS by at least a factor of 5. Under oath, the Whistleblower made a conservative estimate of 45,000 deaths after vaccination.

The Biden Administration Is Treating Informed Consent as Expendable under EUAs.

We often hear that the covid vaccines are experimental, but what does that mean? In effect, it means the vaccine development process, which can take up to 15 years from research and discovery through four Phases of trials, has been expedited to less than a year.

The AFLDS suit points out, “The American public has not been properly informed of these dramatic departures from the standard testing process, and the risks they generate.”

A Fact Sheet accompanies each vaccine, which states effectively, it is your choice to receive or not receive the vaccine. “Should you decide not to receive it, it will not change your standard medical care.” The statement ends there and does not include any other areas of life that can be impacted by a refusal. It is upon this omission that DOJ advised the White House that the right to refusal does not “restrict public or private entities from insisting upon vaccination in any context,” and imposition of “secondary” or “nonmedical” consequences are not in violation of any law. The U.S. Constitution is notably missing from DOJ analysis of the issue.

According to the DOJ, “Although many entities’ vaccination requirements preserve an individual’s ultimate ‘option’ to refuse an EUA vaccine, they nevertheless impose sometimes-severe adverse consequences for exercising that option (such as not being able to enroll at a university” (emphasis added).

Beyond consequences for exercising the right to refuse medical intervention, however, DOJ further advises the White House that informed consent is expendable. In a Memorandum it asserts EUA law “directs only that potential vaccine recipients be ‘informed’ of certain information, including ‘the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.” The Memorandum continues, “Importantly, however, and consistent with FDA’s views, we also read [the EUA law] as giving FDA some discretion to modify or omit ‘the option to accept or refuse’ notification.” (emphasis added).

In justifying its position DOJ relies on statements made in 2003 Project Bioshield hearings, by Marc McClellan, former FDA Commissioner, and Dr. Anthony Fauci, then Director of NIAID, “explaining that the informed consent requirements contained in 21 U.S.C. §355(i)(4) do not apply to EUA products.” Dr. Fauci and Mr. McClellan put on Congressional record, “[U]rgent situations may require mass inoculations and/or drug treatments, such informed consent requirements may prove impossible to implement within the necessary time frame when trying to achieve the public health goal of protecting Americans from the imminent danger.” vi

The AFLDS lawsuit articulates well the dangers we face as Americans to our informed consent:

“The combined effect of (i) the suppression and censorship of information regarding the risks of the Vaccines, (ii) the failure to inform the public regarding the novel and experimental nature of the mRNA Vaccines, (iii) the suppression and censorship of information regarding alternative treatments, (iv) the failure to inform and properly educate the public that the Vaccines are not in fact “approved” by the FDA, (v) the failure to inform and properly educate the public that the DHHS Secretary has not determined that the Vaccines are “safe and effective” and on the contrary has merely determined that “it is reasonable to believe” that the Vaccines “may be effective” and that the benefits outweigh the risks, (vi) the sustained psychological manipulation of the public through official fear-based messaging regarding COVID-19, draconian countermeasures and a system of rewards and penalties, is to remove any possibility that Vaccine recipients are giving voluntary informed consent to the Vaccines. They have no real option to accept or refuse the Vaccines. They are unwitting, unwilling participants in a large scale, ongoing non-consensual human experiment.” vii

Where Do We Go From Here?

Despite clear Executive overreach and abuse of power with respect to Emergency Use Authorizations, the Constitution is still a beacon for those standing up for informed consent and human rights. Justice Alito recently wrote very encouraging words for Americans in a dissenting opinion in one of the first Covid-related cases to reach SCOTUS:

“[A] public health emergency does not give Governors and other public officials carte blanche to disregard the Constitution for as long as the medical problem persists. As more medical and scientific evidence becomes available, and as States have time to craft policies in light of that evidence, courts should expect policies that more carefully account for constitutional rights.” viii

While the wheels of the legal system are turning, health freedom advocates do not need to wait for further injury before taking action. Take a moment right now to call for an investigation into the CDC’s data, which has been the basis for so many restrictions on our liberties. You can also take action to support organizations like Stand for Health Freedom and our co-founder Sayer Ji, along with so many others who are working every day to ensure access to reliable health data so we can all make truly informed choices for our health.

Steps You Can Take

Step One: Sign Our Petition To Convene a Special Grand Jury To Investigate the CDC’s Conduct During COVID-19.

Step Two: Read our article We Are More Than 12

__________________

**Comment**

The CDC doesn’t just weaponize data, they manipulate it.  Go here to see how they twisted data to show a “pandemic of the unvaccinated”:  https://thehighwire.com/videos/cdc-caught-falsifying-data/

click

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

An Independent Doctor Could Save Your Life

https://thenewamerican.com/an-independent-doctor-could-save-your-life-says-dr-singleton/  Video Here (Approx. 20 Min)

An INDEPENDENT Doctor Could Save Your Life, Says Dr. Singleton

 by Alex Newman

Finding an independent physician not beholden to a major hospital or corporation could end up saving your life, Dr. Marilyn Singleton tells The New American magazine’s Alex Newman in this episode of Conversations That Matter.

Dr. Singleton, a lawyer who served as president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), noted that healthcare is increasingly being centralized, thanks in part to government policy. This severely impacts the ability of doctors to treat patients as they think best, and the freedom of patients to find doctors who will respect them and do the right thing.

However, in this interview, Dr. Singleton tells Americans how they can search for an independent doctor, and she gives doctors ideas about how to remain independent by cutting ties with government.

____________________

**Comment**

Nobody understands this phenomenon better than Lyme/MSIDS patients who have to hunt for independent doctors who will dare treat them, as the standard CDC treatment is woefully inadequate and ineffective for anything but acute cases – and even then, sometimes doesn’t work for various reasons.

Now with the COVID debacle, it’s also true that there is a great need to find an independent doctor willing to treat you with cheap, effective COVID treatments that have been proven to work but are highly censored and denied by our corrupt public health ‘authorities’, mainstream medicine, and media as they are all trapped in the government’s corrupt paradigm.

There is a wide-spread concerted effort to monopolize medicine (and everything else).  When government centralizes everything – they remove your choices as a patient and consumer.  This is costing people their lives – and has been an issue for decades with Lyme/MSIDS patients.  Never forget that the AMA (founded by quacks who weren’t even doctors) was found guilty of conspiring against the chiropractic profession to destroy it.  Decades later, it still isn’t over, and it, along with the corrupt FDA and other governmental agencies continues to try to monopolize medicine.

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Treatment, Viruses

Investigation on Links Between Skin, Kidney, & Menstrual Disorders & COVID Jabs

https://thenewamerican.com/eu-drug-regulator-investigates-links-between-skin-kidney-and-menstrual-disorders-and-mrna-covid-19-jabs/

EU Drug Regulator Investigates Links Between Skin, Kidney, and Menstrual Disorders and mRNA COVID-19 Jabs

 by Veronika Kyrylenko 
EU Drug Regulator Investigates Links Between Skin, Kidney, and Menstrual Disorders and mRNA COVID-19 Jabs
Ridofranz/iStock/Getty Images Plus

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has announced it is investigating three new possible side effects that may be linked to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines made by Pfizer BioNTech and Moderna (Spikevax).

Europe’s medicines watchdog, an agency of the European Union in charge of the evaluation and supervision of medicinal products, issued statements on Wednesday confirming that its Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) is looking into whether three medical conditions are connected to the administration of COVID-19 shots that employ mRNA technology following a “small number” of incidences.

One of the three potential side effects being investigated is a dermatologic disorder called erythema multiforme, an allergic reaction that manifests as reddish skin lesions and may also affect mucous membranes in internal body cavities. According to the National Institute of Health (NIH), in general, the cause of the disorder is unknown, but it frequently occurs in association with the herpes simplex virus, suggesting an immunologic process initiated by the virus. In half of the cases, the triggering agents appear to be medications, per NIH.

The two other conditions the PRAC is assessing are related to the kidneys, with one of them, glomerulonephritis, linked to inflammation of tiny filters in the organ (called glomeruli). The usual causes of the disorder include infections and immune diseases. Another one, nephrotic syndrome, is a disorder causing the kidneys to leak too much protein in the urine. Nephrotic syndrome is usually caused by damage to the clusters of small blood vessels in the kidneys that filter waste and excess water from the blood. The PRAC statement says that “affected patients may present with bloody or foamy urine, oedema (swelling of the eyelids, feet or abdomen), or fatigue.” It is also noted that some of the vaccine recipients experienced a relapse of preexisting kidney conditions.

Also, PRAC is looking into menstrual disorders in vaccinated women. Even though it is stated that “no causal association between COVID-19 vaccines and menstrual disorders have been established so far,” and that such disorders are “very common in the general population,” the condition still made it to the list of concerning side effects. To those women who experience unexpected vaginal bleeding (e.g. in postmenopausal women) or who are concerned about prolonged or severe menstrual disturbances, PRAC recommends “to seek medical advice.”  (See article for link)

____________________

**Highlights**

  • 244,807 cases of suspected side effects were reported to EudraVigilance after the Pfizer jab
  • 4,198 died after the shot
  • 48,788 cases of suspected side effects with Spikevax were reported
  • 392 died after the shot

While the CDC explains that “COVID-19 mRNA vaccines give instructions for our cells to make a harmless piece of what is called the “spike protein,” of which only the muscle cells are affected, many experts state just the opposite.

At this point one must ask oneself who stands to gain?  Public health ‘authorities’ who own patents on virtually every aspect of COVID, or doctors/experts who are widely bullied, censored, and potentially will lose their jobs for speaking out.

One such vaccine expert, Byram Bridle, Ph.D, associate professor of Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph, has gained access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency showing spike protein in inoculated people is also found in the spleen, liver, adrenals, and ovaries, where its concentration was the highest.  It also crosses the blood-brain barrier causing neurological damage – which explains the many reports of brain-bleeds and blood clotting.  Bridle states:

The SARS-CoV-2 has a spike protein on its surface. We now know spike protein gets into circulation. We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen; we never knew it was a toxin. So by vaccinating people, we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.

When in circulation, the spike protein can bind to the receptors that are on our platelets and the cells that line our blood vessels. When that happens, it can do one of two things: it can either cause platelets to clump, and that can lead to clotting — that’s exactly why we’ve been seeing clotting disorders associated with these vaccines. It can also lead to bleeding, and of course, the heart is involved, which is part of the cardiovascular system, so that is why we are seeing heart problems.

The inventor of mRNA technology, Dr. Robert Malone, which is used in numerous COVID shots has warned that mRNA vaccines remain “biologically active,” i.e., get bio-distributed throughout the body, and the spike protein is not “harmless,” but “cytotoxic,” which means it can damage cells.  

Pfizer-BioNTech animal trials also showed bio-distribution of the vaccine, with high concentrations mainly observed in the liver, adrenal glands, spleen, and ovaries.  And a Pfizer whistleblower states COVID injections are bioweapons, and a GSK whistleblower states they cause sterility.

A recent paper states the jabs save three but kill two.
Who to believe?  The choice is obvious.

To see the mounting adverse reaction and deaths cause by these injections:   https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/21/warning-3150-injuries-in-1st-week-of-covid-vaccines-among-american-healthcare-workers-pregnant-women-included/

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Vaccine Secrets: COVID Crisis Docuseries (Aug. 30-Sept. 8, 2021)

https://vsecretscc.com/  Go Here to Register

COVID Vaccine in the US alone: 491,217 adverse reports, 11,405 deaths reported. Is this only 1% of the actual number?

Register now for a limited time, FREE viewing of this breakthrough 10-episode docuseries.  Enter your email in top link to secure your spot…

They’re desperately trying to convince us that Covid vaccines are safe for everyone…

But top doctors and scientists from around the world have been speaking out, daring to tell the truth about what’s REALLY happening with the Covid vaccines…

Remember: When it comes to experimental Covid vaccines, what you don’t know WILL hurt you!

That’s why I’ve spent the last year researching and discussing this virus with hundreds of doctors, scientists, and other leading experts from around the world. And the consensus is…

The information being pushed out by the mainstream corporate media is only a tiny fraction of the real story.

That’s why I decided to give you the information that no one else will give you…

I’ve created a groundbreaking 10-Episode docuseries called Vaccine Secrets: Covid Crisis.

In this brand new series I interview dozens of top doctors, scientists, and health experts that answer questions like:

  • Is this injection really safe to take?
  • Why are so many miscarriages happening after taking the injection?
  • What is so dangerous about the “spike protein” and why does the injection program our body to produce it?
  • Why are U.S. corporations making “contingency plans” for the deaths of their employees who’ve received the injection?
  • Why is the injection causing so many blood clots and strokes?
  • How many adverse reactions are really happening after taking the injection and why isn’t this number being accurately reported?
  • Can this injection permanently impact my brain health? (Sadly, our research shows YES it’s very possible…)
  • Were tests manipulated to provide false positives and/or negatives?
  • Why would certain doctors I interviewed say things like, “these are not miscarriages, they are murders”?
  • What can you do if you’ve already gotten the injection? Are you safe?
  • What would cause the political, governmental, medical and scientific communities to sweep all of this under the rug and tell us this injection is 100% safe?

DON’T LET ANYONE TAKE AWAY YOUR HEALTH FREEDOM.

Here’s Exactly What’s Inside Each Episode:

Airing on Aug 30 | 8PM EST / 5PM PST

  • Why are unapproved experimental vaccines being pushed on us?
  • What’s really in the Covid-19 injections? Why are they unlike any other vaccines? And how do they actually work? Dr. Larry Palevsky reveals the 5 crucial points why they’re not vaccines — as taught in medical schools.
  • Top doctors explain how messenger RNA can change the expression of your genes — permanently.
  • How ingredients in the Covid shot can trigger a cytokine storm, cause inflammation in the brain and spinal cord, and result in autoimmune diseases like Multiple Sclerosis and Guillain Barre

Airing on Aug 31 | 8PM EST / 5PM PST

  • How the unapproved, experimental Covid vaccines have turned millions of people into human guinea pigs
  • Why does VAERS — the “official” government database for vaccine deaths and adverse reactions — reflect only 1% of the true numbers?
  • Why the Covid vaccine prompts the development of so many variants — which are then immune to the vaccine
  • Why have other vaccines been banned after dozens of deaths — while the Covid vaccine is promoted as “completely safe” after thousands of deaths?

Airing on Sep 1 | 8PM EST / 5PM PST

  • Why are so many double-vaccinated people dying from Covid if the vaccines are so effective?
  • How the “Trusted News Initiative” was set up by corporate media giants to crush any information about Covid vaccines that doesn’t conform to their narrative
  • Why the “government experts” and the mainstream media keep pushing masks when so many scientific studies have proven they’re ineffective
  • How government officials and bureaucrats have socially weaponized the Covid vaccine — shaming, bribing, and coercing vulnerable people into getting vaxxed

Airing on Sep 2 | 8PM EST / 5PM PST

  • How can the “experts” claim that the Covid vaccines are safe when they’re not FDA approved (Emergency Use Authorization only)
  • Why all the major Covid vaccines hijack the body’s genetic machinery (RNA and DNA) for the body to produce the dangerous spike protein — unlike any other vaccines ever produced
  • Why women are advised to postpone mammograms after getting the “completely safe” Covid vax — which causes swelling in the lymph nodes
  • Why have billions of people around the world been forced into life-changing lockdowns through media-generated fear and panic — for a condition that has a 99% survival rate for people over 70?

Airing on Sep 3 | 8PM EST / 5PM PST

  • Why are pregnant women being told that the Covid vaccines are “completely safe” when Big Pharma and the FDA deliberately excluded pregnant women from randomizing testing to avoid injuring them and their unborn babies?
  • How Covid vaccines are affecting fertility and menstruation
  • Why the “experts” are ignoring the increased the risk of miscarriages
  • Why are nursing mothers being told it’s “completely safe” to take the Covid vaccines — which are passed on to their babies through breast milk?

Airing on Sep 4 | 8PM EST / 5PM PST

  • Why do the “experts” dismiss Hydroxychloroquine when there are 259 supportive trials on 385,000 individuals demonstrating its safety and effectiveness?
  • Why are you not hearing that studies show 30% fewer deaths and 87% fewer hospitalizations resulting from this family of commonly prescribed meds?
  • Why has Ivermectin — which offers some protection against the spike protein and been proven safe and effective in 60 trials — been dismissed by the “experts”?
  • Which commonly prescribed drug showed a 25% reduction in hospitalization and deaths in 4,000 outpatients with symptomatic Covid?

Airing on Sep 5 | 8PM EST / 5PM PST

  • How the same governments and “experts” that created a climate of fear, panic, and isolation are pushing the Covid vaccines as the “solution”
  • Why are US state and federal governments bribing vulnerable people into getting vaxxed?
  • How employers can fire unvaxxed employees
  • How governments and schools can forcibly vaccinate children without parental knowledge and consent

Airing on Sep 6 | 8PM EST / 5PM PST

  • How to stand up for your rights against a powerful government-forced and media-backed vaccine tyranny
  • Why the Covid vaccine is creating a two-tiered society (vaxxed and non-vaxxed)
  • How to fight back against vaccine discrimination
  • How to strengthen yourself physically, mentally, and spiritually to resist being bullied into getting vaxxed

Airing on Sep 7 | 8PM EST / 5PM PST

  • How the world’s richest and most powerful people are driving the vaccine agenda — including “philanthropic” billionaire Bill Gates who is entrenched with every aspect of the Covid vaccine
  • Why global governments are promising the world will be “transformed” by 2030
  • How the Covid vaccines could lead to transhumanism — where everything is digital and humans are connected to the Internet
  • Why the nanotechnology inside the Covid vaccines could be the first step towards transhumanism

Airing on Sep 8 | 8PM EST / 5PM PST

  • What are the best natural detox methods?
  • How to boost the immune system naturally and maximize good health
  • What are the best foods and supplements to fortify your body?
  • What types of food you should avoid

Discover The Vaccine Secrets From Our Leading Experts

Click on top link to see Trailer and register for series.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Are COVID Shots Fueling More Dangerous Mutations?

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/08/12/covid-shots-drive-mutations.aspx  Video in link

If Youtube censors this “must see” video, which it probably will, go to Odysee here:  https://odysee.com/@whatsherface:2/variants:d

Are COVID Shots Fueling More Dangerous Mutations?

Analysis by Dr. Joseph MercolaFact Checked

August 12, 2021

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • When vaccines that don’t provide robust immunity are overused, they allow viruses to mutate in potentially hazardous ways. COVID variants with measurably different behavior emerged in mid-December 2020, which coincides with the rollout of the first COVID shots
  • While variants were identified in various areas before the shots were introduced in those same regions, vaccine makers were conducting large-scale trials on thousands of people in those areas well before the shots became available to the public, and before variants were detected
  • The COVID shots do not prevent infection or transmission, hence the variants created inside vaccinated individuals will spread. This hypothesis was confirmed in a 2015 study, which found that “imperfect vaccination can enhance the transmission of highly virulent pathogens”
  • Research shows fully vaccinated individuals who develop breakthrough infections with the Delta variant have the same viral loads as unvaccinated individuals infected with this virus, hence both groups can spread the infection to the same degree
  • Data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show 74% of COVID-19 diagnoses in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, between July 6 through July 25, 2021, and 80% of hospitalizations, were among the fully vaccinated

Will mass injections against COVID-19 encourage the mutation of more dangerous versions of SARS-CoV-2? In the video above, WhatsHerFace questions why the U.K. government is procuring 6 million pounds’ worth of body bags, or “temporary body storage,” even as government officials announce that the current vaccination rate has “created a protective wall” against the infection.1

If that’s true, why are they expecting an “excess death scenario” requiring massive numbers of body bags? The procurement agreement will remain in effect for a period of four years. Does the U.K. government know something they’re not sharing with the public?

Have they peeked at the actual science and realized that mass vaccination during an active pandemic might encourage mutations that evade vaccine-induced defenses, or that the gene-modifying injections might render the vaccinated more susceptible to serious illness and death through a mechanism known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) or the more descriptive term, paradoxical immune enhancement (PIE)?

Where Are the Variants Coming From, and Why Now?

WhatsHerFace highlights some of the answers given by health professionals on social media when asked why no problematic variants emerged during the first year, when no COVID injections were available, and only popped up after the mass injection campaign started.

According to one such answer, “Our surveillance sucked in the beginning and it takes time for variants to come about but once they come they become rampant.” Interestingly, as noted in a February 15, 2021, article in The Conversation,2 variants with “measurably different behavior” did not emerge until mid-December 2020, which just so happens to be the exact time at which the first COVID shots were rolled out.

Fact checkers have tried to debunk any connection between COVID shot rollouts and the emergence of variants by showing that variants were identified in various areas before the shots were introduced in those same regions. However, as noted by WhatsHerFace, vaccine makers were conducting large-scale trials in those areas well before the shots became available to the public.

For example, Pfizer enrolled more than 46,000 participants in the U.S., Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, Germany and Turkey,3 and Oxford/AstraZeneca injected 23,000 participants in the U.K., Brazil and South Africa.

“Now this is very interesting,” WhatsHerFace says, “because you’ll actually find that each of the areas where variants first emerged just happen to be the same countries where the trials took place.”

The Backstory of the Delta Variant

The Delta variant (B.1.617.2) was initially identified in India December 1 and 11, 2020. While the COVID jabs were not rolled out in India until mid-January 2021, Phase 3 trials for Biotech’s Covaxin were initiated in Bharat, India, November 16, 2020. By December 22, 2020, 22,500 volunteers had received the jab.

On a side note, the Indian government released Covaxin to the public before Phase 3 trials were completed and in the absence of any safety or efficacy data. According to some vaccinologists, the emergence of potentially more problematic variants following mass vaccination rollouts during an active pandemic is precisely what you’d expect.

Dr. Geert Vanden Bosche,4 whose resume includes work with GSK Biologicals, Novartis Vaccines, Solvay Biologicals and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, published an open letter5 to the World Health Organization, March 6, 2021.

In the letter, Bosche warned that implementing a global mass vaccination campaign during the height of the pandemic could create an “uncontrollable monster” where evolutionary pressure will force the emergence of new and potentially more dangerous mutations.

“There can be no doubt that continued mass vaccination campaigns will enable new, more infectious viral variants to become increasingly dominant and ultimately result in a dramatic incline in new cases despite enhanced vaccine coverage rates. There can be no doubt either that this situation will soon lead to complete resistance of circulating variants to the current vaccines,” Bossche wrote.6

‘Leaky’ Vaccines Promote Mutations

In short, when vaccines that don’t provide robust immunity are overused, they allow viruses to mutate in potentially hazardous ways. When you overuse an antibiotic that fails to eradicate the bacteria, antibiotic-resistant bacteria are allowed to flourish.

In the same way, overuse of a vaccine that doesn’t provide immunity can allow the virus to mutate inside vaccinated individuals into variants that evade vaccine-induced immunity.

And, as we already know, the COVID shots do not prevent infection or transmission, hence the variants created inside vaccinated individuals will spread, attacking both vaccinated and unvaccinated alike. This hypothesis was confirmed in a 2015 study7 in PLOS Biology, which found that “imperfect vaccination can enhance the transmission of highly virulent pathogens.” As explained by the authors:8

“There is a theoretical expectation that some types of vaccines could prompt the evolution of more virulent (‘hotter’) pathogens. This idea follows from the notion that natural selection removes pathogen strains that are so ‘hot’ that they kill their hosts and, therefore, themselves.

Vaccines that let the hosts survive but do not prevent the spread of the pathogen relax this selection, allowing the evolution of hotter pathogens to occur. This type of vaccine is often called a leaky vaccine. When vaccines prevent transmission, as is the case for nearly all vaccines used in humans, this type of evolution towards increased virulence is blocked.

But when vaccines leak, allowing at least some pathogen transmission, they could create the ecological conditions that would allow hot strains to emerge and persist.

This theory proved highly controversial when it was first proposed over a decade ago, but here we report experiments with Marek’s disease virus in poultry that show that modern commercial leaky vaccines can have precisely this effect: they allow the onward transmission of strains otherwise too lethal to persist.

Thus, the use of leaky vaccines can facilitate the evolution of pathogen strains that put unvaccinated hosts at greater risk of severe disease.”

This research was reported in a number of mainstream media publications, including Live Science,9 Newsweek10 and National Geographic.11 Quanta Magazine also took a deep dive into it in May 2018, closing the article with the following observation:12

“… the most crucial need right now is for vaccine scientists to recognize the relevance of evolutionary biology to their field. Last month, when more than 1,000 vaccine scientists gathered in Washington, D.C., at the World Vaccine Congress, the issue of vaccine-induced evolution was not the focus of any scientific sessions.

Part of the problem, [disease ecologist Andrew] Read says, is that researchers are afraid: They’re nervous to talk about and call attention to potential evolutionary effects because they fear that doing so might fuel more fear and distrust of vaccines by the public …”

The COVID shots, which do not make you immune against the virus but rather only lessen symptoms of infection, are a perfect example of leaky vaccines that can allow the virus to mutate within the mildly ill host, who then transmits the mutated virus to others. In this way, the shots can fuel a never-ending chain of outbreaks.

NPR Highlights How Vaccines Drive Viral Evolution

In a February 9, 2021, article,13 NPR highlighted this risk, stating that “vaccines could drive the evolution of more COVID-19 mutants.” According to NPR science correspondent Richard Harris, “the virus is always mutating. And if one happens to produce a mutation that makes it less vulnerable to the vaccine, that virus could simply multiply in a vaccinated individual.”

Simply having a virus mutating inside you isn’t necessarily dangerous, however. The viral load also plays an important role in determining how potentially dangerous a vaccinated individual who carries a mutation might be. If your viral load is low, the risk of you transmitting the mutated virus to others is also low. If your viral load is high, then the risk of transmission increases accordingly.

When it comes to the Delta variant, there’s bad news for those who have received one or more COVID shots, as research14 shows fully vaccinated individuals who develop breakthrough infections with the Delta variant have the same viral loads as unvaccinated individuals who are infected with this virus. As reported by Reuters August 2, 2021:15

“Among people infected by the Delta variant of the coronavirus, fully vaccinated people with ‘breakthrough’ infections may be just as likely as unvaccinated people to spread the virus to others, new research suggests. The higher the amount of coronavirus in the nose and throat, the more likely the patient will infect others.

In one Wisconsin county, after Delta became predominant, researchers analyzed16 viral loads on nose-and-throat swab samples obtained when patients were first diagnosed. They found similar viral loads in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, with levels often high enough to allow shedding of infectious virus.

‘A key assumption’ underlying current regulations aimed at slowing COVID-19 transmission ‘is that those who are vaccinated are at very low risk of spreading the virus to others,’ said study coauthor Katarina Grande of Public Health Madison & Dane County in Madison, Wisconsin.

The findings, however, indicate ‘that vaccinated people should take steps to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 virus to others,’ she added.”

Lambda Variant Shows Signs of Vaccine Resistance

The latest coronavirus on the block is Lambda, which was first identified in Peru. It’s now spreading through South America. Like the Delta variant, Lambda is more infectious than the original SARS-CoV-2 virus. Unlike Delta, it appears more resistant to vaccine-induced antibodies.

According to Reuters,17 three spike protein mutations “help it resist neutralization by vaccine-induced antibodies.” While some claim the emergence of Delta and Lambda is justification for a third booster shot, Rockefeller University researchers point out that a third dose might raise the number of antibodies, but it won’t improve their ability to neutralize viruses.18,19

If a third dose can’t neutralize any of the variants any better than two doses, then we’re back at the beginning of this vicious cycle where imperfect neutralization drives additional mutation.

The Rockefeller University paper also highlights the superior protection offered by natural immunity, which is what you get after you’ve recovered from an infection. According to the authors,

“memory antibodies selected over time by natural infection have greater potency and breadth than antibodies elicited by vaccination.”

For transparency, one of the coauthors, Michel Nussenzweig, told Reuters that if an updated injection capable of protecting against one or more specific variants were to become available, “then that would be the choice.”

I mention that, because the competing interest statement on that paper reveals the Rockefeller University “has filed a provisional patent application in connection with this work … (US patent 63/021,387). The patent has been licensed by Rockefeller University to Bristol Meyers Squib.”

An identical competing interest statement can also be found on other recent papers, including a preprint paper20 titled “Development of Potency, Breadth and Resilience to Viral Escape Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies.”

At the time of writing, I got nothing but error messages when trying to access the U.S. patent office to confirm what U.S. patent 63/021,387 might be, but based on the papers bearing this competing interest statement, it sounds like the Rockefeller University might be patenting a new COVID shot against variants.

First COVID Shots Appear Ineffective Against Newer Variants

At the same time that Moderna and Pfizer raise prices on their individual COVID shots by 10% and 25% respectively,21 evidence of their ineffectiveness continues to mount.

In a July 30, 2021, report,22 Sharyl Attkisson cited data23 from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which show that 74% of COVID-19 diagnoses in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, between July 6 through July 25, 2021, and 80% of hospitalizations, were among the fully vaccinated.

“The report contradicts multiple false reports that have claimed the vaccines are ‘100% effective’ in preventing hospitalization,” Attkisson writes.24

“It also contradicts false reports that have implied vaccinated people are not spreading Covid-19. According to CDC, the fully vaccinated are showing just as high of a ‘viral load’ as unvaccinated people who get infected.

CDC published new data25 on the topic in its weekly report. It says that most of the identified cases of Covid-19 in a Barnstable County, Massachusetts, town, in July (74%) were among fully vaccinated people.

Most, but not all, had the Delta variant. Additionally, four of five hospitalized patients were fully vaccinated. Only one was not fully vaccinated. Today, CDC also acknowledged that Covid-19 viral load is ‘similarly high’ in both vaccinated and unvaccinated people. That’s a result, say officials, of the Delta variant.

From the start, virologists said that there would be natural variants to Covid-19. They also accurately predicted that effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines would wear down in a matter of months, not years. Now, CDC is confirming that the current Covid-19 vaccines are not working effectively against Covid-19.

In contrast, the millions of Americans who have fought off Covid-19 infections, either with or without symptoms, are proving to have greater and longer lasting immunity, so far, than those who have been vaccinated. That, too, was predicted by virologists.”

Americans are now told the Delta variant is a pandemic among the unvaccinated, even though the data doesn’t support this claim. The CDC appears to be trying to prop up this narrative by not reporting breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals unless they are hospitalized or die.

Even then, they acknowledge them only if they have a positive PCR test run at a cycle threshold (CT) below 28,26 whereas unvaccinated people are still tested at a CT of 40 or above. The higher the CT, the greater the chance of a false positive.

Israeli Data Show Waning Effectiveness of Pfizer Shot

Israel is now recommending a third booster shot for people over the age of 60, as data27 show the Pfizer injection is only 39% effective (relative risk reduction) against the Delta variant, down from 64% relative effectiveness two weeks earlier.

As of August 2, 2021, 66.9% of Israelis had received at least one dose of Pfizer’s injection; 62.2% had received two doses.28 A day earlier, August 1, director of Israel’s Public Health Services, Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, announced half of all COVID-19 infections were among the fully vaccinated.29 Signs of more serious disease among fully vaccinated are also emerging, she said, particularly in those over the age of 60.

Alternative Treatments

In closing, remember there are several different treatment protocols for COVID-19 that appear just as effective for variants as for the original virus, including the following:

____________________

For more:

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses