Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

Fauci Plot to Blow the Vaccine System Up

https://thenewamerican.com/october-2019-cspan-video-shows-fauci-plotting-to-blow-the-vaccine-system-up  (Video Here)

October 2019 CSPAN Video Shows Fauci Plotting To Blow The Vaccine System Up

by Ben Armstrong

Evil Fauci plot exposed! Horrible Department of Defense vaccine numbers are exposed! 2.5 million reported Instances of adverse effects from COVID vaccine affecting 570,000 people and that is the best case scenario! (See link for video)

This video presents a panel discussion hosted by the Milken Institute discussing the need for a Universal Flu Vaccine, that everyone would have to take and would make a huge profit for Big Pharma.  The 1 minute and 51 second dialogue is between moderator, Michael Specter, a journalist who is a New Yorker staff writer and also an adjunct professor of bioengineering at Stanford University, Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Rick Bright, director of HHS Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA).

Fauci explains that bringing a new, mRNA vaccine, would take at least a decade, and he would know as he’s been trying to develop an mRNA “vaccine” for HIV for a decade.

Brian Shilhavy digs into the original 1 hour video where the following join Fauci, Specter, and Bright:

  • Margaret Hamburg, Foreign Secretary, National Academy of Medicine
  • Bruce Gellin, President, Global Immunization, Sabin Vaccine Institute
  • Casey Wright, CEO, FluLab

They admit the old way of producing vaccines was not sufficient for their purposes, that the annual flu virus was not scary enough to create an event to convince people to take the jab, and that they needed a global event where many people were dying, to be able to roll out a new mRNA “vaccine” to be tested on the public.

By now you know the punch line.

Shilhavy points out the discussion reveals a lot about “public health” including:

  • If they do too good of a job in public health, then they lose funding to develop products.
  • The estimate that 650,000 people die yearly from the flu is a complete guess as there are probably less than 1,000 confirmed laboratory cases of influenza each year in the U.S.
  • Bright complains that the yearly distribution of flu vaccines is inefficient in terms of collecting data, and in the process actually admits that some vaccines just don’t work well:

“We distribute 150 million doses of the seasonal (flu) vaccines every year, we don’t even know how many people are being vaccinated from the doses that are delivered to the people, which doses they got, and what the real outcome was, so that we can learn from that knowledge base on how to optimize or improve our vaccine. So there are opportunities that we have today…

I think if we uncloaked the poorest performing vaccines in the market place today, it might be very revealing to tell us which of the technologies we have, and allow us to go deeper into those technologies to determine why they are more effective. There are vaccine licenses today that are more effective. I think that we’re just afraid to admit the truth.”

So much for vaccines being completely “safe and effective.”
  • The panel discussion can be boiled down to: Nobody wants to fund research for a universal flu vaccine. So how do we change that? Create a pandemic of fear over the flu (but they couldn’t call it the “flu” because people are no longer afraid of influenza, and the fear over “AIDS” had also subsided).
  • Hamburg states that this time it has to be different and the need to really be organized in a way where there will be accountability for sustained action.
  • Fauci also tips his hand was to why he’s opposed to natural immunity. In short, it translates into an immune response against other strains which will interfere with his vaccine agenda.  He wants to jab 6 month old babies with a universal “vaccine” to prevent “confused” natural immunity from happening  before the child grows older.
  •  Wright made a remarkable comment about the need for “philanthropy” as it allows more risk with experimentation and bolder concepts.  Of course this is where the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, and other “philanthropies” come in as they are free of regulatory issues and have no accountability.
  • Gellin then talks about a report published by his organization that called for an “entity” that would make these decisions and bring everyone together to collaborate to create this universal vaccine, and eliminate those who oppose.

Shilvany states:

This is one of the most explosive videos I have ever watched that takes us into the mindset of the Globalist Tyrants and their greedy desire to control the human race by means of vaccines.

As you watch this, you need to ask yourself: Who appointed these people as caretakers of humanity to decide what is good for the entire human race?  Source

DISCLAIMER: Views and opinions expressed on The Ben Armstrong Show are solely those of the host and do not necessarily represent those of The New American. TNA is not responsible for, and does not verify the accuracy of any information presented.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Amish Have Herd Immunity By Defying Everything the Government Says

https://fullmeasure.news/news/shows/amish-covid  (News Video Here)

Amish Covid

By FULL MEASURE STAFF Sunday, October 10th 2021
Excerpts of article:

Lapp: “There’s three things the Amish don’t like. And that’s government— they won’t get involved in the government, they don’t like the public education system— they won’t send their children to education, and they also don’t like the health system. They rip us off. Those are three things that we feel like we’re fighting against all the time. Well, those three things are all part of what Covid is.”

Lapp says they weren’t denying coronavirus, they were facing it head on.

Nolt: I know of some cases in which Amish people refused to go to the hospital, even when they were very sick because if they went there, they wouldn’t be able to have visitors. And it was more important to be sick, even very sick at home and have the ability to have some people around you than to go to the hospital and be isolated.

Then, last March, remarkable news. The Lancaster County Amish were reported to be the first community to achieve “herd immunity,” meaning a large part of a population had been infected with Covid-19 and became immune.

One thing’s clear: there’s no evidence of any more deaths among the Amish than in places that shut down tight— some claim there were fewer here. That’s without masking, staying at home, or another important measure.

By staying open, the Amish here have one tangible 2020 accomplishment few others can claim.

__________________

**Comment**

I love it when the little guy wins.

The Amish, like Sweden, and parts of India, defied what corrupt public health officials have tyrannically mandated and not only lived to tell the tale, but thrived beyond all the nay-sayer’s expectations.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Merck’s New COVID Drug Is Making News – How Does It Compare To Ivermectin?

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/john-campbell-mercks-covid-molnupiravir-ivermectin

Merck’s New COVID Drug Is Making News — How Does It Compare to Ivermectin?

In his latest video, John Campbell, Ph.D., compared ivermectin, whose use as a COVID treatment has been widely criticized by mainstream media, with Merck’s new COVID drug, Molnupiravir, which is garnering positive media coverage.
© [10/8/21] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.
John Campbell, Ph.D., compared ivermectinwith Merck’s new COVID drug, Molnupiravir.

In his latest video, John Campbell, Ph.D., compared ivermectin, whose use as a COVID treatment has been widely criticized by mainstream media, with Merck’s new COVID drug, Molnupiravir, which has been the subject of glowing media attention.

Campbell, a UK-based nurse teacher, cited several studies as he compared the two treatments on the basis of effectiveness, safety and cost. He first turned to a paper in the Austin Journal of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, “Drugs Shown to Inhibit SARS-Cov-2 in COVID-19 Disease: Comparative Basic and Clinical Pharmacology of Molnupiravir and Ivermectin.”

The peer-reviewed paper refers to ivermectin as the most studied “repurposed” medication globally, and notes that it is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and “classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an ‘essential’ broad spectrum antiparasitic, antibiotic, and has demonstrated broad antiviral activity against RNA viruses, including HIV, Zika, MERS and coronavirus.”

“And of course, ivermectin also won the Nobel Prize in 2015,” Campbell said.

According to the paper, Campbell said, Molnupiravir — though still going through trials and safety testing — is believed to “work against seasonal and pandemic flu, MERS, coronavirus and SARS-CoV-2.” The paper’s author noted that Molnupiravir does not inhibit inflammation, whereas ivermectin does.

How do the two drugs compare on cost? Ivermectin is exponentially cheaper than Merck’s new Molnupiraravir.

The cost of a complete five-day course of Molnupiravir is $700 — or $70 per pill. That amounts to a 4,000% markup over what it costs Merck to make the drug.

Citing 2013 prices provided by the WHO, Campbell said a five-day course of ivermectin — 10 3mg pills — costs $0.53. (However, at today’s U.S. prices, 10 3mg pills cost about $39).

On effectiveness, Molnupiravir is lacking data. The only publicly available clinical data on Molnupiravir comes from a Merck press statement claiming the new drug is 50% effective against hospitalizations and deaths, when used as an early treatment.

For ivermectin, using publicly available data, Campbell referred to one peer-reviewed study that pegs ivermectin’s effectiveness in early treatment at 62%, and an ongoing meta-analysis which shows ivermectin is 66% effective in early treatment and 86% effective as a prophylactic.

Using VigiBase, a WHO database on pharmaceutical safety data, Campbell showed that out of  3.7 billion doses given of ivermectin there have been only 5,693 reports of adverse events — far fewer, according to Campbell, than the number of adverse event reports associated with amoxicillin and ibuprofen, both widely used and considered safe.

Comparable safety information for Merck’s Molnupiravir is not yet available, as trials and studies are still ongoing. But Campbell did raise concern about  Molnupiravir’s mutagenic properties. He cited the Austin Journal of Pharmacology and Therapeutics paper which states, “there is some concern about the safety of [Molnupiravir’s] NHC-nucleoside triphosphate, which is mutagenic to mammalian cells.”

According to Campbell, Merck denies this is a problem. But the paper suggests, at the very least,” it needs looking into,” Campbell said.

Watch the video here:

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

__________________

**Comment**

“Merck denies this is a problem.”

Ha, ha, ha….seriously, at some point you have to just look at this as theater of the absurd.

Due to Merck’s denial, our corrupt government and complicit mainstream media and medicine also will not see a problem.

It’s called blindness.

Two Indian Drugmakers have ended their trials of molnupiravir. They should have just followed the success of their countrymen in Uttar Pradesh as ivermectin brought COVID deaths down to ZERO. 

The interesting part: Merck earlier suspended its own development of it due to…..wait for it…..because many patients reached a phase of the disease that is too late for an antiviral drug to provide much help.

That’s interesting.

The Spartacus Paper and states:

Because of the way they are constructed, Randomized Control Trials will never show any benefit for any antiviral against COVID-19. Not Remdesivir, not Kaletra, not HCQ, and not Ivermectin. The reason for this is simple; for the patients that they have recruited for these studies, such as Oxford’s ludicrous RECOVERY study, the intervention is too late to have any positive effect.

This fact, while taken into account for their “golden child,” drug is completely ignored by those denying the efficacy of ivermectin.

There have been 63 AND COUNTING studies involving 26,000 patients showing a 96% reduction in DEATH using ivermectin.

That’s a big deal.  BIG!

A source with the Drug Controller General of India said molnupiravir has not shown “significant efficacy” against moderate COVID.  Aurobindo and MSN are conducting studies on patients with mild COVID.

The elephant in the room is ivermectin, which works beautifully in the exact same phases and costs a fraction of the price, but is being censored out of existence.

Category:

Treatment, Viruses

52 Page COVID “Vaccine” Death Report

https://drtrozzi.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/The-Vaccine-Death-Report.pdf

By David John Sorensen and Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, MD

September, 2021

Version 1.0

THE VACCINE DEATH REPORT

Evidence of millions of deaths and serious adverse events resulting from the experimental COVID–19 injections

P U R P O S E
The purpose of this report is to document how all over the world millions of people have died, and hundreds of millions of serious adverse events have occurred, after injections with the experimental mRNA gene therapy. We also reveal the real risk of an unprecedented genocide.

F A C T S
Our aim is to only present solid facts, and stay away from unfounded claims. The data is clear and verifiable. References can be found with all presented information, which is provided as a starting point for further investigation.

C O M P L I C I T Y
The data shows that we are currently witnessing the greatest organized mass murder in the history of our world. The severity of this situation compels us to ask this critical question: will we rise up to the defense of billions of innocent people? Or will we permit personal profit over justice, and be complicit? Networks of lawyers all over the world are preparing class action lawsuits to prosecute all who are serving this criminal agenda. Hundreds of millions of people worldwide are rising up against this criminal operation. To all who have been complicit so far, we say: There is still time to turn and choose the side of truth. Please make the right choice.

W O R L D W I D E
Although this report focuses on the situation in the United States, it also applies to the rest of the world, as the same type of experimental injections with similar death rates – and comparable systems of corruption to hide these numbers – are used worldwide. Therefore we encourage everyone around the world to share this report. May it be a wake up call for all of humanity.

(See link for full report)

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

More Pictures of “Vaxxed” Blood. Patients Suffering From Severe Thrombosis, Embolisms, Headaches, Pain, Cognitive Issues, Blood Clots, & Shortness of Breath

**UPDATE June, 2022**

Please listen to this extremely important podcast where Dr. Jane Ruby explains that embalmers are finding white, fibrous substances in the vaxxed.  Scroll to 9:00 for details and pictures.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/l7YfHcrsf6IC/  Video Here  (Approx. 20 Min)

Dr. Zandre Botha was shocked after studying the blood of “vaccinated” patients that were coming to her with serious illness after being injected with the shots being called “Covid vaccines”.

At 15:30 she states that after attending “vaxxed” patients and handling their blood she didn’t feel well and has experienced hormonal symptoms, anxiety, as well as a feeling that her brain was shaking.  Other doctors have told her they too struggled with similar symptoms after treating patients who have gotten the COVID shots.

At 16:50 she discusses things that have helped her “vaxxed” patients as well as herself (zeolite, NAC, glutathione, ozone, molecular hydrogen).

Recently I posted Dr. Carrie Madej’s microscopy findings on the COVID shots that showed graphene-like substances, metals, and a “creature” or “object” that experts state looks and acts like “Hydra Vulgaris,” a fresh-water polyp with 4-12 tentacles.

She states the creature in the vials “acted self aware” and was able to lift itself off the glass slide.

This type of hydra is used in genomic and transhumanism research for morphalactic regeneration because they reproduce quickly either through sexual reproducing, budding, or indirectly through regeneration, making them biologically immortal. 

In 2018 UC Davis received a 1.5 million grant from the government to make hydra a better model for studying regeneration, and more recently received a $1 million Keck Foundation grant to advance the team’s synthetic neurobiology effort to define the connections between neurons and muscles that drive programmed behaviors in living animals.  The article title states it’s research to “build a brain.”

The value, in this case, is the potential to break existing connections and create new ones, which could be used to engineer new behaviors.

The NIH has actively partnered with the National Science Foundation for genomics research as of January, 2021. The same NIH that developed the spike protein in 2018.

The evidence of intelligent self-assembly of nanotechnology and intelligent filament-movement is an indicator of synthetic biology and nanobioelectronics, as per several scientific papers published in various journals, and points to the stealth inclusion of Graphene Oxide in the Moderna vaccine for electromagnetic manipulation of cells and neurons via the creation of synthetic neural networks in the human body and brain. This is a clear sign of malfeasance and intended transhumanizing and cyborgizing of the human body through the COVID vaccines.

It must be remembered that both Pfizer and Moderna developed the Transhumanist mRNA vaccines for DARPA, on DARPA contracts from 2013. Pfizer and Moderna’s military connections as well as the mRNA connections with DARPA’s Regina Dugan now directing the Wellcome LEAP ventures and DARPA’s Dan Wattendorf now at the Gates Foundation were discussed here earlier. DARPA’s “Pandemic Prevention Platforms” and ADEPT diagnostic and monitoring platforms are based on bioengineering, gene manipulation, and synthetic biology. These human-takeover programs envision an infinite future of mRNA vaccines and external control of the human body and brain, which Graphene Oxide would permit.  Source

For more on Graphene:

Graphene Oxide nanoparticles have been found by electron microscopy and spectroscopy, among other techniques to be in the COVID PCR and antigen testing swabs, masks, and injections.

Recently someone translated the Spanish study, “Nanotechnological Investigations on COVID-9 Vaccines: Detection of Toxic Nanoparticles of Graphene Oxide and Heavy Metals,” into English.  Spanish version here:  informe-es(1)

Microscopy expert Dr. Robert Young also shows that COVID vials contain graphene oxide, parasites (Trypanosoma Cruzi), stainless steel, and other metals and contents: GrapheneOxideVaccinePaperUpdated7

Other reports are showing ADE, myocarditis, blood changes, and other side effects caused by the COVID shots.

________________

https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video/2021/10/vaxx-vials-breaking-development-discs-carry-mystery-payload/

VAXX VIALS Breaking Development: Discs Carry “Mystery Payload”

By

During the weekly “Ask Dr. Jane” segment on “The Stew Peters Show”, Dr. Jane Ruby revealed a breaking development, and a deeper look into the findings of Dr. Zandre Botha, who previously exposed never-before-seen images of the contents of the “vaccine” vials.

The question begging to be asked is what are these discs carrying?

Category:

vaccines, Viruses