Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Vaccine For Inflammation in the Works

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2019/08/vaccine-for-inflammation-in-the-works/

Vaccine for Inflammation in the Works

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • Scientists are working on a vaccine for autoimmune, inflammation-induced mental health issues using soil-derived bacteria.
  • Vaccines have been implicated in increasing the risk for neuropsychiatric issues in children.
  • Vaccines and all other immune-system activators act by provoking an inflammatory response.

Christopher Lowry, PhD and a team of researchers from the University of Colorado at Boulder are working on a vaccine to prevent inflammation-induced mental illness.1 The scientists are working with Mycobacterium vaccae, bacteria found in soil that has demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties in animal subjects. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not yet approved human trials, but Dr. Lowry hopes to create a vaccine for inflammation-induced mental health issues.

A number of neuropsychiatric issues have been linked to vaccination. A pilot study by scientists from Yale University and Pennsylvania State University, for example, showed that children who had received a flu vaccine had an 80 percent higher risk of being diagnosed with an eating disorder within three months compared with non-vaccinated controls. The risk for a obsessive-compulsive disorder was 23 to 27 percent higher three to 12 months following vaccination.2

Vaccination Produces Inflammation by Its Nature

The idea of vaccinating against inflammation may meet with challenges, as vaccination depends on inducing an inflammatory reaction as its mechanism of action. As explained by nephrologist Suzanne Humphries, MD,

“A vaccine by definition, causes repeated, chronic inflammation at set time intervals. Vaccines are designed to create peripheral inflammation…”3

The inflammatory response itself is crucial to any immune response, whether a natural trigger such as an infectious agent, an antigenic challenge, a physical stressor or vaccination. It is inflammation that signals the arrival of operatives of the immune system into the area of infection or damage, as indicated by the five “cardinal signs” of inflammation: redness, heat, pain, swelling, and loss of function.4

It is when the normal, healthy inflammatory response does not recede once the threat has been neutralized that inflammation may become chronic, resulting in any of over 100 potential autoimmune disorders including lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, Crohn’s disease and fibromyalgia to name just a few.5

Vaccination of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) can be problematic. Typically, anti-inflammatory therapies not only blunt the inflammatory reaction necessary for a vaccine response but also increase the likelihood of patients developing infectious diseases.6 Some concern has also been expressed that vaccination itself could act as a trigger for autoimmune disorders.7

According to immunologist and diabetes researcher Barthelow Classen, MD, the inflammatory responses generated by repeated vaccinations can and do produce the chronic inflammation and immune system overload that can lead to some of the more prevalent autoimmune disorders seen in today’s children.8 He adds that most patients do not even realize that they are suffering from the adverse effects of vaccines.

“Chronic inflammation is a serious health problem in the U.S. and around the world and all potential root causes should be fully investigated, including vaccination,” noted journalist Rishma Parpia in a 2016 article in The Vaccine Reaction.9

To propose that an inflammation-mediated mental illness (or any inflammation-based disorder) could be prevented with a vaccine designed to stimulate further inflammation is certainly an interesting concept that merits careful study.

References:

1 Kommers A-M. 5 Things To Know About A Potential Vaccine To Fight Mental Illness. Becker Hospital Review July 16, 2019.
2 McGovern C. Vaccination May Increase Risk of Rare Psychiatric Childhood Disorders, Study Finds. The Vaccine Reaction Feb. 13, 2017.
3 Humphries S. Vaccination. DrSuzanne.net.
4 Clem AS. Fundamentals of Vaccine Immunology. J Glob Infect Dis January-March 2011.
5 Autoimmune Disease List. American Autoimmune Related Diseases Association 2019.
6 Rahier J-F, et al. Vaccinations in Patients with Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases. Rheumatology 2010.
7 Hammoudi DA-S et al. Induction of Autoimmune Diseases Following Vaccinations: A Review. SM Vaccine Vaccin 2015; 1(3): 1011.
8 Classen JB. Review of Vaccine Induced Immune Overload and the Resulting Epidemics of Type 1 Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome, Emphasis on Explaining the Recent Accelerations in the Risk of Prediabetes and other Immune Mediated Diseases. Journal of Molecular and Genetic Medicine 2014; S1:-025.
9 Parpia R. Inflammation: The Good and the Bad. The Vaccine Reaction Mar. 23, 2016.

_________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/08/vaccine-safety-efficacy-studies-that-are-the-bases-for-marketing-authorizations-are-a-complete-methodological-mess/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/11/28/biological-mechanisms-of-vaccine-injury/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/12/06/mechanisms-of-vaccine-injury-part-2/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/07/23/lyme-disease-vaccines-past-future/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/09/21/aluminum-flawed-assumptions-fueling-autoimmune-disease-and-lyme/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/06/01/immunoexcitotoxicity-as-the-central-mechanism-of-etiopathology-treatment-of-autism-spectrum-disorders-a-possible-role-of-fluoride-aluminum/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/09/28/toxic-metal-pollution-linked-with-development-of-autism-spectrum-disorder/

Vaccine Informed Consent Press Conference

Vaccine Informed Consent Press Conference

Published on Apr 30, 2019

A news conference that calls attention to Pennsylvania House Bill 286, also known as the Informed Consent Protection Act. It would bar doctors from denying care to children whose parents have chosen not to vaccinate them.
Dr. Moss, an expert on medical ethics speaks first.
  • Doctors are refusing to treat children who are not vaccinating their children exactly as they say.  Moss states this is a return to “Paternalism,” where doctors are forcing their opinions upon parents of children. They are coercing parents into vaccinating their children against their better judgment.
Attorney Mary Holland speaks next and is a faculty member of NYU School of Law. She’s written two books on vaccines. She also has a vaccine injured child.
  • Holland states that it is a form of discrimination when parents are ostracized for departing from the orthodoxy of vaccine schedules. History has shown that when the right of informed consent is denied, it leads to very dark places: concentration camps, & experimentation on disabled children, African Americans, & Jews. She also states that, “fear of contagion is not a basis for rational discrimination.”
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler is a biomedical research scientist and has written three books. He runs IPAK (Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge) is a not-for-profit organization which exists to perform scientific research in the public interest. It is registered with the State of Pennsylvania as a not-for-profit pure public charity.
  • Weiler points out that safety studies on vaccines remove those at risk for the very adverse reactions the study is looking for. He reminds us that there’s never been a single randomized prospective double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial to answer the question, “What if we vaccinated some people and not others?” He states it’s the most important question that could be asked. IPAK is conducting a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study.

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/04/23/texas-bill-would-increase-vaccine-safety-reject-federal-narrative/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/08/vaccine-safety-efficacy-studies-that-are-the-bases-for-marketing-authorizations-are-a-complete-methodological-mess/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/03/21/congress-receives-vaccine-safety-project-details-since-the-cdc-fda-ignore-their-own-data-and-proclaim-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/06/13/blast-from-the-past-cdc-vaccine-authors-destroy-evidence-of-vaccine-harm/

FYI:  Every single Lyme/MSIDS patient I know that got vaccinated suffered a relapse of symptoms.

Pharmaceutical Fraud & The Hidden Side of Clinical Trials

 Approx. 17 Min

Published on Jul 12, 2019

A case study in corporate malfeasance. References available at: tinyurl.com/y3mrknxq
The story I’m going to tell today begins just before the turn of the century. The year is 1999 and Merck has brought a new pain killer onto the market called Vioxx. According to a paper published in the British Medical Journal, since the early development of Vioxx some scientists at Merck were concerned that the drug might adversely affect the cardiovascular system. Despite Merck’s knowledge that Vioxx might increase blot clot formation, none of the intervention studies it did for the FDA in 1998 were designed to evaluate cardiovascular risk. So let’s think about this for a minute. Merck’s own scientists, while developing this new drug, say this could be bad for the heart, it could be bad for the cardiovascular system. So Merck made the decision to NOT evaluate the cardiovascular risk of that drug in its new drug application to the FDA. And let’s see how that turned out.
 Approx. 13 Min.

TEDx Talks

Published on Sep 28, 2016
Around half of the clinical trials done on medicines we use today are not published. A tragic truth that needs to be changed, to help doctors do their job properly and to not betray the trust of all those who have volunteered to be part of those trials. Find out more about the AllTrials campaign ad references for claims made in the talk at www.AllTrials.net. In particular, read more about the claim that around half of all clinical trials on the medicines we use today have not published results here http://www.alltrials.net/wp-content/u…. Audiovisual producer: Daniel Goldmann. Editing: Xavi Fortino. Film team: Elena Salcedo, Josep Fernández, Daniel Davidson, Nicolás Mazzini, Nacho Valentín, David Ramos, Ignacio Fuentes and Fran Rubio. Síle Lane is director of campaigns and policy at Sense about Science, a charity concerned with the use and abuse of scientific evidence in public life. Síle helps run the global AllTrials campaign for clinical trial transparency which is supported by thousands of people and organizations worldwide.
https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/24/financial-kickbacks-for-vaccinations-abusive-illegal-fraudulent/  “This brings us to the financial incentives to pediatricians offered by insurance companies for vaccinating our children. The Blue Cross Blue Shield health insurance document explaining these financial incentives can be found here:  https://jeffreydachmd.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Pediatricians-Receive-Financial-Incentives-Kickbacks-to-Vaccinate-Children-BCBS-2016-Booklet.pdf  Pediatricians are raking in 40-80 thousand dollars a year from these kickback schemes.”

Polio-like Disease Expected To Increase This Fall

Please read up on the chronology of Polio and the fact 95% of people who contract it have ZERO symptoms.  There is also a 38 times increased risk of permanent injury from the IPV vaccine than from the infection itself.

Please see comment after article on how AFM has been associated with Lyme/MSIDS.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2019/07/23/acute-flaccid-myelitis-polio-like-disease.aspx?

Polio-like disease expected to increase this fall

Analysis by Dr. Joseph MercolaFact Checked
acute flaccid myelitis polio like disease

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • While the global polio eradication effort appears to have been successful, routine vaccination may simply have replaced one disease with another
  • U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is urging health care professionals to be on the lookout for cases of acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) — a polio-like disease that first drew the agency’s attention in 2014
  • Outbreaks of AFM have been recorded on a biennial basis, with spikes occurring in 2014, 2016 and 2018. While symptoms mimic those of paralytic polio, investigations have failed to find the poliovirus in any of the confirmed cases of AFM. At present, the enterovirus D68 is a top suspect in AFM
  • For decades, it’s been known that under certain conditions a phenomenon referred to as “provocation polio” can occur after injections, including injections of vaccines. Yet this issue is being largely, if not entirely, ignored in today’s discussions about AFM

Polio (poliomyelitis) is a very contagious enterovirus infection that usually causes mild flu-like symptoms or no symptoms at all, and most people recover from polio without lasting health problems (nonparalytic polio).1

However, severe complications of polio can cause partial or total body paralysis, breathing difficulties and death.2 The first clinical description of this contagious disease was given by Michael Underwood, a British doctor, in 1789. The first recorded outbreak of polio in the U.S. occurred in Vermont in 1894.3

As noted by the Polio Eradication Initiative,

“In the early 20th century, polio was one of the most feared diseases in industrialized countries, paralyzing hundreds of thousands of children every year.”4According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, “In the early 1950s, before polio vaccines were available, polio outbreaks caused more than 15,000 cases of paralysis each year in the United States.”5

Dr. Jonas Salk began studying polio in 1947, and in the mid-1950s developed the first inactivated injectable polio vaccine (IAV).6,7 A live attenuated oral polio vaccine (OPV) was developed in the early 1960s, and quickly became the vaccine of choice around the globe.8

During the 1970s and ’80s, routine use of OPV for child vaccination programs was adopted by countries around the world and, in 1988, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution to eradicate polio by 2000. The last known case of wild type polio in the Western Hemisphere is believed to have occurred in Peru in 1991.9,10

The live attenuated polio vaccine can cause vaccine strain polio paralysis in the person vaccinated or someone who comes into contact with the body fluids (urine, stool, saliva) of a recently vaccinated person shedding vaccine strain polio virus.11

It wasn’t until 1999 that U.S. public health officials switched from recommending universal use of live OPV and started recommending the use of inactivated polio vaccine (IVP) again, “to eliminate the risk for vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis.”12

Vaccine-derived polio on the rise

While the global poliovirus eradication effort appears to have been successful, the consequences of routine use of OPV are not fully known. In 2009, the World Health Organization warned that live polio vaccine may be responsible for a rise in vaccine strain polio termed Vaccine Derived Polio Disease (VDPD).13,14

Not only has live vaccine strain poliovirus been found to cause paralytic disease in some cases, but evidence also shows that mutated vaccine-derived viruses are responsible for some outbreaks.15,16 As reported by NPR in 2017:17

“For the first time, the number of children paralyzed by mutant strains of the polio vaccine are greater than the number of children paralyzed by polio itself. So far in 2017, there have been only six cases of ‘wild’ polio reported anywhere in the world …

By contrast, there have been 21 cases of vaccine-derived polio this year. These cases look remarkably similar to regular polio. But laboratory tests show they’re caused by remnants of the oral polio vaccine that have gotten loose in the environment, mutated and regained their ability to paralyze unvaccinated children

‘It’s actually an interesting conundrum. The very tool you are using for [polio] eradication is causing the problem,’ says Raul Andino, a professor of microbiology at the University of California at San Francisco.”

A year later, as further evidence that VDPD is still frustrating public health officials, the Polio Global Eradication Initiative reported that worldwide in 2018 there were 104 confirmed cases of VDPV — and only 33 cases of wild poliovirus.18


We may be going from bad to worse

A 2016 study19 in the Journal of Virology highlighted the very real problems that human populations face from mutated vaccine-derived polioviruses:

“Until this outbreak, Sabin-like viruses (in distinction to more markedly evolved vaccine-derived polioviruses [VDPVs]) were reported to cause only sporadic cases of VAPP [vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis]. Consequently, VAPP cases were not considered to require outbreak-type responses.

However, the Biysk outbreak completely blurred the borderline between Sabin-like viruses and VDPVs in epidemiological terms. The outbreak demonstrated a very high disease/infection ratio, apparently exceeding even that reported for wild polioviruses.

The viral genome structures did not provide any substantial hints as to the underlying reason(s) for such pathogenicity … Altogether, the results demonstrate several new aspects of pathogenicity, epidemiology, and evolution of vaccine-related polioviruses and underscore several serious gaps in understanding these problems.”

CDC warns polio-like disease is spreading

In 2009, WHO20 urged enhanced surveillance for acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), of which one known cause is paralysis from wild type or vaccine strain polio.21 In October 2018, the Washington State Department of Health issued a 23-page Acute Flaccid Myelitis and Poliomyelitis Reporting and Investigation Guideline.22

The guidelines advised doctors about how to conduct a routine investigation of suspected cases of Acute Flaccid Myelitis (AFM), a polio-liked disease, as well as suspected cases of wild type or vaccine strain polio:

“Any person noted to have AFM has the potential to be a polio case. Immediately obtaining information about prior immunizations and recent travel or exposure to a recent OPV vaccinee is extremely important for every suspect AFM case.”

In evaluating and determining the likelihood of a diagnosis, public health officials directed doctors to:

Review the clinical presentation, physical exam findings (particularly flaccid weakness).
Review immunization history and risk factors for infection (e.g., recent travel to a polio endemic area or possible exposure to a person that recently received oral polio vaccine).
Obtain history of any recent viral respiratory and/or gastrointestinal illness.
Confirm that clinical criteria including CSF findings and/or MRI test results are met for AFM cases.
If pursuit of laboratory testing is indicated, facilitate timely collection of appropriate specimens and expedite transport of those specimens to PHL.
If a commercial laboratory isolates polio virus in cell culture, request that the laboratory send the cell culture to PHL for confirmatory testing immediately.

State health officials also advised that:

“For a suspected polio case, contacts must be identified and monitored for symptoms. Collection of stool and serum samples from household members and other contacts associated with possible transmission settings may be required. For a confirmed polio case, vaccination should be offered to susceptible contacts with an emphasis on persons who have an ongoing risk of exposure.”

July 9, 2019, the CDC issued a call for increased paralytic disease surveillance,23,24 urging health care professionals to be on the lookout for cases of AFM, which first drew the agency’s attention in 2014. Cases of AFM have been increasing in the U.S., but the CDC maintains the cause is still unknown.

As described by the Cleveland Clinic,25 AFM “is characterized by muscle weakness and myelitis of the spinal cord’s anterior horn cells following a viral illness.” The disease affects primarily children. During the 2018 outbreak in the U.S., the median age of confirmed cases was 5.3 years.26 As for its diagnosis, the Cleveland Clinic says:

“Children with AFM typically present with acute onset of asymmetric flaccid paralysis, often rapidly progressing from normal strength to flaccid weakness with loss of reflexes within hours to a few days. A prodromal illness (typically febrile with respiratory symptoms) a few days prior to the onset of flaccid paralysis is common.

Perplexingly, the respiratory symptoms of the prodromal illness are frequently shared by sick contacts within the household, but they are spared any signs or symptoms of AFM. Patients also frequently report pain in the affected limb at the time of weakness onset.

There does not appear to be any ethnic or racial predispositions, pre-existing comorbidities that place these healthy children at increased risk or any association with vaccination status …

Current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions for AFM require two criteria: acute onset of flaccid limb weakness and MRI evidence of a gray matter lesion spanning one or more spinal segments.

According to the CDC, outbreaks of AFM have been recorded on a biennial basis since then, with spikes occurring in 2014, 2016 and 2018.27 While the symptoms of AFM mimic those caused by poliovirus, investigations have failed to find the poliovirus in any of the confirmed cases of AFM that were lab tested. The CDC stated in its July 2019 report that “Stool specimens from all patients with available specimens tested negative for poliovirus,” while also acknowledging that:28

“Timing of respiratory specimen collection improved in 2018 compared with that in 2016, but still occurred a median of approximately three days after the onset of limb weakness and five days after the onset of any respiratory illness. Shedding of viruses in the respiratory tract can be transient, so delays in specimen collection could contribute to negative findings.”

Mutated enterovirus D68 may be responsible

At present, other enteroviruses, especially coxsackievirus A16, enterovirus A71 and enterovirus D68, are suspected of being responsible for AFM.29

The AFM outbreak in 2014 in the U.S. occurred concurrently with an outbreak of EV-D68,30 a pathogen known to cause respiratory illness. A 2018 paper31 in Frontiers in Microbiology, “Enterovirus D68 — The New Polio?” highlights evidence identifying EV-D68 as a probable cause of AFM.

“The EV-D68 storyline shows many similarities with poliovirus a century ago, stimulating discussion about whether EV-D68 could be ascertaining itself as the ‘new polio,'” the paper states.32

The authors also cite research showing EV-D68 has undergone genetic alterations “known to affect the translational efficiency and thought to increase the virulence.” However, EV-D68 is only found in about half of all cases. Testing of samples taken during the 2014 AFM outbreak revealed EV-D68 in 47% of the samples collected within seven days of disease onset.33

Another study34 found the virus in 48% of respiratory samples collected from AFM patients. However, as noted in The Atlantic,35 the lack of active EV-D68 infection doesn’t mean the virus cannot be the trigger of AFM:

“In many neurological infections, the worst symptoms aren’t caused by the virus itself, but by the body’s disproportionate immune response. That response can continue even after the virus has been cleared, which means that patients often test negative for whatever first triggered their illness.

All the researchers I spoke to think AFM likely behaves in this way, especially since there can be a seven-day gap between the condition’s initial coldlike symptoms and the severe paralytic ones.

By the time parents seek medical help, their children could be suffering from their body’s misplaced attempts to fight an enemy that’s no longer there.”

The ignored vaccine-paralysis link

However, while researchers are trying to pin down the viral cause, there may be something else going on here. For decades, it’s been known that injections, including injections of vaccines, sometimes can cause paralysis under certain conditions — a phenomenon referred to as “provocation polio.” Yet this issue is being largely, if not entirely, ignored in today’s discussions about AFM.

In response to the 2016 BMJ article36 “Conflicts of Interest Compromise U.S. Public Health Agency’s Mission,” Allan S. Cunningham, a retired pediatrician, questioned whether Americans can “trust the CDC to honestly investigate the current AFM outbreak”37 specifically. In his response, Cunningham points out how the CDC is avoiding the well-recognized link between injections and paralytic disease:

“Antecedent injections have been suggested as possible co-factors by clinician-scientists who remember ‘provocation paralysis;’ Hill and Knowelden, for example, found a 20-fold risk of paralytic polio in children who received the DTP shot during the 1949 British polio epidemic …

During the 1990s the NEJM published a study in Romania linking vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) to penicillin injections. Tissue studies have shown how muscle damage by an injection can provide a portal of entry to the CNS for neurotropic viruses.

Cunningham describes a conversation he said he had with an unnamed public health official about the 2016 AFM outbreak in Washington State, alleging the health official was aware of the provocation paralysis theory but was “wary of anti-vaccine forces who would misuse data suggesting a serious adverse effect of vaccinations,” and that “for this reason he indicated that statistical details of the CDC’s investigation would not be released to the news media.”

“The CDC, the AAP and many public health officials are afraid that any bad news about vaccines will cause the public to turn away from life-saving vaccines,” Cunningham writes.

“Along with the manufacturers, they are also afraid of the effect such news might have on incomes and careers. Will the CDC do an unbiased, thorough and transparent investigation of the current AFM outbreak?

Similarly, in a November 2016 article,38 Marcella Piper-Terry, a biomedical consultant and founder of VaxTruth.org, pointed out that AFM following routine childhood vaccination is “nothing new.” “The connection between childhood vaccination and provocation paralysis has been known since the polio outbreaks in the 1940s and 1950s,” she wrote.

The history of provocation polio

Indeed, the 2014 Lancet paper,39 “Polio Provocation: Solving a Mystery with the Help of History,” by Stephen Mawdsley, recounted this history, observing that “Evidence of this correlation was first published by German doctors, who noted that children who had received treatment for congenital syphilis later became paralyzed in the injected limb.

French and Italian studies corroborated the link between injections of DPT vaccine and provocation polio paralysis, Mawdsley stated, and by the end of World War II, “injection-induced polio emerged as a public health concern.” He explained:40

“The application of epidemiological surveillance and statistical methods enabled researchers to trace the steady rise in polio incidence along with the expansion of immunization programs for diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus.

A report that emerged from Guy’s and Evelina Hospitals, London, in 1950, found that 17 cases of polio paralysis developed in the limb injected with pertussis or tetanus inoculations.

Results published by Australian doctor Bertram McCloskey also showed a strong association between injections and polio paralysis. Meanwhile, in the USA, public health researchers in New York and Pennsylvania reached similar conclusions. Clinical evidence, derived from across three continents, had established a theory that required attention.”

The mounting scientific evidence that emerged during the 1950s fueled concerns to the point that booster shots were discouraged whenever there was a polio outbreak and “laws mandating pediatric vaccinations before school attendance were relaxed.”41

Immunization practices were also reformed and, according to Mawdsley, “Most health professionals … accepted that seasonal factors and cycles of disease were important to consider before immunizing children.”42

Polio vaccine swept ‘provocation polio’ under the rug

The link between provocation paralysis and vaccine injections quickly receded with the advent of the polio vaccine and mass vaccination programs, however. Mawdsley stated:43

“Once polio vaccination programs established herd immunity among children and adults, the corresponding risk of toxoid-based injections inciting polio paralysis was effectively eliminated.

Orthodox public health and surgical practices were restored. Although medical scientists failed to understand the epidemiological mechanism behind polio provocation, the Salk and Sabin vaccines pushed the issue to the margins of clinical attention.”

Mechanism of injection-induced polio revealed

In the 1990s, scientific advances allowed for a more thorough investigation of the link between vaccine injections and paralysis and, in 1998, the first paper44 describing the actual mechanism of injection-induced polio paralysis was published.

The research, conducted by two State University of New York researchers, Matthias Gromeier and Eckard Wimmer, revealed

“that tissue injury produced by an injection aided the poliovirus to infect the body and readily journey to the spinal cord,” Mawsdley writes, adding “For the first time, health professionals working in polio endemic regions had scientific evidence that pediatric injections could incite paralysis.”

In areas where polio was controlled through vaccination, however, vaccine-induced paralysis “was insignificant,” suggesting the polio vaccine effectively reduced the risk of other vaccinations causing paralytic disease.

A question Mawdsley does not address, however, is how the mutation of vaccine viruses affects this chain of events. We now apparently have vaccine-derived mutated polioviruses that are more virulent than the original poliovirus, and respiratory enteroviruses that are somehow able to trigger paralysis.

Mawdsley does note that concerns about provocation polio resurfaced in the 1980s when routine vaccination programs began to flourish, as the incidence of paralysis again began to rise.

Vaccination also linked to transverse myelitis

According to the Transverse Myelitis Association, AFM is a subtype of transverse myelitis,45 and this condition has also been linked to vaccinations. A 2009 systematic review46 published in the journal Lupus found:

“… 37 reported cases of transverse myelitis associated with different vaccines including those against hepatitis B virus, measles-mumps-rubella, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and others, given to infants, children and adults. In most of these reported cases the temporal association was between several days and 3 months, although a longer time frame of up to several years was also suggested.”

Transverse myelitis is also recognized by the U.S. Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) as a possible injury following receipt of several different types of vaccines.47,48 Piper-Terry writes:49

“In the 1980s, the United States government went on record as choosing the vaccination program over the well-being of children, publishing the following in the Federal Register (the daily journal of the U.S. government), in regard to the polio vaccine:

‘… [A]ny possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives.'”

A PDF copy of that Federal Register article, dated June 1, 1984, can be downloaded at the end of Piper-Terry’s article.50 “We need to scream from the rooftops that it is time to stop the sacrifice of our children,” she writes, adding:

“Please pray for … the families of all the children who are caught in the middle of what can only be described as a battle between innocent lives and … forces … fueled by the billions of dollars greasing the palms of those who make the decisions about mandatory vaccinations.”

Signs and Symptoms of AFM

With cases of AFM on the rise in the U.S., it’s important to be on the lookout for potential signs and symptoms of AFM, particularly in children. These include:51

Difficulty moving the eyes Facial droop or weakness
Slurred speech Loss of muscle tone
Drooping eyelids Difficulty swallowing
Sudden arm or leg weakness Loss of reflexes

If you notice any of these symptoms, seek medical care immediately as AFM can be life-threatening. The most severe symptom is respiratory failure due to flaccid breathing muscles. In this case, a ventilator may be required. Other neurological complications may also occur, some of which may lead to death.

You cannot find what you refuse to look for

Unfortunately, diagnosis can be difficult, and treatment even more so. According to the CDC:52

“There is no specific treatment for AFM, but a doctor who specializes in treating brain and spinal cord illnesses (neurologist) may recommend certain interventions on a case-by-case basis. For example, neurologists may recommend physical or occupational therapy to help with arm or leg weakness caused by AFM.”

CDC officials state there are few tools for prevention of AFM: “Since we don’t know the cause of most of these AFM cases or what triggers this condition, there is no specific action to take to prevent AFM.”

Unfortunately, unless all of the potential causes of AFM are explored, including provocation polio, which has been linked to acute flaccid paralysis, we may continue to remain in the dark about the cause of this crippling condition for quite some time.
_________________________

For more:

Polio-like disease as been associated with Lyme/MSIDS:

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/11/07/connection-of-acute-flaccid-myelitis-and-vaccinations/  In this article, James Lyons Weiler states:

The US press has been pushing a view of acute flaccid paralysis as a mysterious condition of unknown etiology (unknown cause). Checking the scientific literature, however, tells us that AFP is most often Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS), a condition that appears on the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program as a “Table Condition” – i.e., one that the US HHS has no defense against when parents file in the NVICP for compensation for GBS as a vaccine injury in their children.  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/12/07/acute-flaccid-paralysis-is-most-often-guillain-barre-syndrome/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/07/14/clinical-association-lyme-disease-and-guillain-barre/  In Dr. Waisbren’s book, Treatment of Chronic Lyme Disease, the majority of his 51 cases of chronic Lyme had high EBV titers. He also states,

“As will be seen in other cases, the Epstein-Barr virus may be a candidate for a co-infection associated with LD.”  

Waisbren often treated this co-infected patients that had EBV with 1000mg of Valtrex three times a day with good success.  He also used gamma globulin (4cc twice a week).

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/04/11/diagnosed-with-ebv-had-lyme/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/04/25/ebv-protein-can-turn-on-genes-for-autoimmune-diseases/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/01/18/acute-transverse-myelitis-a-clinical-manifestation-of-lyme-that-nobody-has-a-clue-about-prevalence/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/01/09/transverse-myelitis-guillain-barre-associated-with-bartonella/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/04/21/neurological-lyme-disease-what-you-need-to-know/  “Once microbes start becoming active, inflammation increases and immune functions are further compromised, establishing what I call Chronic Immune Dysfunction (CID). In its weakened state, the immune system allows reactivation of viruses such as Epstein Barr virus (EBV), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), and other similar viruses — all of which most people harbor in their tissues. These viruses are commonly associated with neuroinflammation, and they tend to complicate the picture of LNB.”

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/11/04/24514/  EBV a Key Player in Chronic Illness & Tips to Treat Reactivated EBV.

Oppose Wisconsin Rule Change to Mandate Meningitis Vaccines & Require Documentation of Chicken Pox Infection

image001

OPPOSE Wisconsin Rule Change to Mandate Meningitis Vaccines and Require Documentation Of Chicken Pox Infection

Submit Comments before 5:00 p.m. Friday 7/26/2019

Attend or Call in to Hearing on Friday7/26 from 8:30-9:30 a.m.

Dear Wisconsin NVIC Advocacy Team Members,

This is a critical action alert for Wisconsin families who care about vaccine choice.

The Wisconsin Department of Health Services is seeking to use the rule making process to increase vaccine mandates for students. This is different from a bill that passes through the legislature, though adopted rules have the same force as law.

If these regulations pass, 7th graders will be required to get a meningitis vaccine and parents will no longer be allowed to confirm that their children had chicken pox, requiring medical personnel to verify it.  These rules are another step toward taking away parental choice in medical decisions for their family and YOUR input is necessary to stop additional government overreach.

The most important way to stop these changes is to SUBMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS OPPOSING the proposed rule change by 5:00 pm on Friday, JULY 26.  It is critical that large numbers of opposition comments are received to stop this rule from passing.

ACTION TO TAKE:

  1. Submit public comments before 5:00 p.m. on Friday 7/26! Talking points below.

Use  web-site form: Select DHS 144 from “Rulemaking Projects” box.

OR

Written comments can be mailed (postmarked by 7/26) or e-mailed by 5:00 p.m. on 7/26:

Susan Uttech

Division of Public Health

Department of Health Services

1 W. Wilson St.

Madison, WI 53703

Email: susan.Uttech@dhs.wisconsin.gov

  1. Attend the public hearing in Madison on 7/26 – testify to oppose the changes.

            Friday, July 26th at 8:30 am-9:30 am.

Conference Room 751

1 Wilson Street

Madison WI  53703 Map 

  1. Call into the hearing to give public comment. Call (608) 316-9000 and use Conference ID: 7313694
  2. Send a copy of this email to your friends and encourage or assist them in writing and submitting public comments.
  3. Please send a copy of your comments to your own state legislators in the house and senate asking them to oppose these rules if they make it to the legislature for approval.  Your legislators can be found HERE:  Enter your address in the web-form.
  4. Continue monitoring the NVIC Advocacy Portal NVICAdvocacy.org to track the status of these rules or other legislation. From here, the Rules will later go before both the House & SenateHealth and Human Services Committees for approval or rejection.  Please save copies of your comments submitted to the department so you can send a copy of your comments to these committee members, with a request that they STOP these Rules when/if they are presented if the health department does not withdraw them.  

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED RULES & REASONS TO OPPOSE THEM

  • Proposed changes to Immunization Requirements: HERE.
  • Analysis of the rule and the additional documents: HERE
  • The most recent version of the proposed rule text: HERE.   DHS 144
  • The fiscal estimate and economic impact analysis: HERE.
  • The public hearing notice can be found HERE.

There are several proposed rule changes.  1, 2, 4 and 5 cause the most concern, with 4 and 5 being the most concerning.

1) The Department proposes to change the “substantial outbreak” classification of chicken pox and meningitis.

2) The Department proposes to change the “substantial outbreak” classification of mumps due to mumps outbreaks in “highly-vaccinated populations.”

4) Meningitis vaccine is mandated for 7th grade students.

5) Parents are no longer able to provide confirmation of their children’s case of chicken pox/varicella, requiring a health care provider to now confirm it.

TALKING POINTS:  These are listed in order of importance.  Please use your own words to state your opposition to the proposed changes and include any personal stories that support your concerns.

OPPOSE Proposed Change 4. Meningitis vaccine requirement for 7th graders.

  • There is no urgent public health crisis to justify the expensive and potentially dangerous meningitis vaccine mandate for all Wisconsin 7th graders.
  • Meningitis is very rare in the United States, with the CDC reporting a total of only 350 cases in 2017.  The 2017 US population of approximately  325.7 million, meant that 1 in 931,000 people got meningitis and 1 in 7.2 million died.  Of the 45 deaths, ONLY 14 cases were in the age group 0-23.  These numbers do NOT indicate a public health crisis.  The mandate is unnecessary.
  • Meningococcal vaccine is currently available to any family who wants it.
  • According to the CDC, Wisconsin recorded only 6 meningococcal cases in 2016 and 4 cases in 2017. The state records are slightly different, yet, in 2015, there were only 3 cases in the 14-23 age group, with one of those being in college or technical school.
  • The vaccine only has an 80-85% efficacy rate. After two years to five years, the vaccine has been found to be, at best, only about 58 percent effective. Due to the  vaccine’s effectiveness waning, the only recommendation is that ADDITIONAL vaccines be given.
  • The package inserts for meningitis vaccines, Menactra and Menveo, indicate that   “serious adverse events” occur in 1 percent of recipients.
  • According to the CDC Pink Book, 0.3 percent of those with “serious adverse events” from meningitis vaccines will die.
  • If approximately 63,000 7th graders are given the Menactra or Menveo meningitis vaccines, Wisconsin can reasonably expect 630 serious adverse events and possibly 2 (1.89) deaths.
  • This is significant since the 2015 Wisconsin data only shows 2 cases of meningitis in high school age students with NO deaths.
  • The federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), which includes only a small fraction of the health problems that occur after vaccination in the U.S., reports 32,453 adverse events as of July 2019.  Of these, 3,955 were considered serious and there were 186 deaths, with 90 of those being in children under 17 years of age. www.medalerts.org
  • The meningitis vaccines contain neurotoxins such as formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, polysorbate 80, and thimerosal, a mercury derivative.
  • Meningitis vaccines list documented side effects including death, anaphylaxis/anaphylactic reaction, difficulty breathing, upper airway swelling, Guillain-Barré syndrome, dizziness, convulsion, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, irritability, abnormal crying, fever, drowsiness, fatigue, injection site pain and swelling, sudden loss of consciousness (syncope), diarrhea, headache, joint pain, brain inflammation, and facial palsy.   BexseroMenveo,Menomune, Menactra

OPPOSE Proposed Change 5. Parental reporting of chicken pox will no longer be acceptable.  Instead, a health care provider must confirm infection.

  • It is irresponsible of the Department to insist that a child with a highly contagious, yet often a generally mild disease, visit a medical facility where other children, including those who are medically fragile, will likely be present and thus at higher risk to contract it and become one of the rare adverse outcomes.
  • Not all families have existing relationships with the list of specified medical workers, and this provision could force a family to enter into a new unwanted contractual relationship with unknown medical staff.
  • Most families will also have the financial burden of all charges, or co-pays as well as laboratory fees.
  • This change would create an environment of distrust between the school staff and the parents as the parents’ word is questioned.
  • There is no provision for a titer test to be used as proof.

The Department’s claims of “little to no economic impact” in their justification for the rule change doesn’t reflect the strong negative economic impact on Wisconsin Families

  • Wisconsin families will be required to pay for doctor visits and vaccine costs to receive newly mandated vaccines.
  • The annual cost for approximately 63,000 Wisconsin 7th graders to receive meningitis vaccines will be over $10.7 million as the CDC vaccine price list for Bexsero shows the private sector cost at $170/dose.  Add in office visit expenses and there is little doubt why there is significant support for this vaccine by those who gain financially for its mandated use.
  • Requiring Wisconsin families to pay for doctor visit to have chicken pox verified will be expensive.  For generations, many families have treated chicken pox at home, as it is generally mild.  Arranging an office visit for a case of the chicken pox would add drastically to the economic impact on the families of a sick child.

OPPOSE Proposed Change 2. Change the “substantial outbreak” classification of mumps

  • The mumps component of the MMR used in the US has been the subject of a federal whistleblower fraud suit since 2010.  Two manufacturer (Merck) virologists claimed they were forced to create fraudulent efficacy results by adding rabbit antibodies so that the vaccine could remain on the CDC schedule and Merck could retain its monopoly.
  • The reason for this change is due to mumps outbreaks in “highly-vaccinated populations,” showing the vaccine’s ineffectiveness.  A few years, 1676 Arkansas school age children had mumps and 1536 (92%) had previously received at least two doses of a vaccine containing the mumps virus.  A recent mumps outbreak amongst  100% vaccinated Navy sailors on the USS Ft. McHenry, kept it in quarantine for over 5 months.
  • The Health Department should educate families on the risks of catching mumps and how to treat it due to an ineffective vaccine.

OPPOSE Proposed Change 1. Change the “substantial outbreak” to include meningitis and chicken pox. OPPOSE the inclusion of chicken pox in the “substantial outbreak” classification due to it generally being a mild infection that can be treated at home.

OPPOSE Department’s lack of notifying the public, the MAIN STAKEHOLDER, when publishing these proposed rules changes.

  • The Department claims they contacted all stakeholders which would be impacted by the proposed rule including, “Schools, school-aged children and parents, school boards, and public and private health care providers.”
  • Parents were not included as stakeholders, neither were they adequately informed.  The Department’s effort to inform the primary stakeholder, parents of school age children, was completely inadequate.  If not for the attention by watch dog groups, this rule would be implemented without parents knowing of their ability to participate in the process to oppose it.
  • Using the Rule process to change vaccine mandates removes the process from legislators who are accountable to their voting constituents.

Sincerely,

NVIC Advocacy Team
National Vaccine Information Center
http://NVIC.org and http://NVICAdvocacy.org
https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Members/ContactUs.aspx

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) works diligently to prepare and disseminate our legislative advocacy action alerts and supporting materials.  We request that organizations and members of the public forward our alerts in their original form to assure consistent and accurate messaging and effective action. Please acknowledge NVIC as originators of this work when forwarding to members of the public and like-minded organizations. To receive alerts immediately, register  at http://NVICAdvocacy.org, a website dedicated to this sole purpose and provided as a free public service by NVIC.