Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

South Korean’s Medical Association Urges Government to Suspend Flu Shot Program After 25 People Die

https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/south-koreans-medical-association-urges-government-to-suspend-flu-shot-program-after-25-people-die/

South Korean’s Medical Association Urges Government to Suspend Flu Shot Program After 25 People Die

Oct. 23, 2020

 

A man gets an influenza vaccine at a hospital in Seoul, South Korea. Image Source.

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

One of the interesting side effects of the COVID Plandemic, and the rush to bring to market a new, untested COVID vaccine, is that many people around the world have become more skeptical of vaccines, and for good reason.

However, the problems associated with vaccines have been around for decades, and as we have documented frequently here at Health Impact News on our VaccineImpact.com website, the annual flu vaccine is, by far, the most dangerous vaccine in the world, causing more injuries and deaths than all other vaccines put together.

This is not a conspiracy theory, but a fact based on the sheer volume of settlements that the U.S. Government makes every year in the Vaccine Court for injuries and deaths due to the flu shot.

We publish these reports every quarter, and past reports can be found here, where you can view the data yourselves.

Every year people are harmed and killed by the flu shot, but this information is censored in the U.S.

So it is highly unlikely that the death of 24 people in South Korea just after receiving the flu shot would have even made the news at all in the years pre-COVID. Because this pretty much happens every year when the flu season starts and mass vaccination of the public for influenza begins.

With literally hundreds of millions of doses of the flu vaccine being manufactured every year, a few hundred, or even a few thousand deaths, is generally not noticeable as doctors are not trained to look for vaccine injuries, and the vaccine will never be blamed.

But with the attention of the public on the upcoming COVID vaccine and a newfound interest in actually looking into the politics and science of vaccines, all of a sudden people are starting to sit up and take notice.

South Korean’s medical association urges govt to suspend flu shot program after 25 people die following jab

by RT.com

Excerpts:

The Korean Medical Association has called on the country’s government to halt its plan to inoculate millions of citizens after more than two dozen people died after receiving flu shots.

The vaccine initiative, billed as a strategy to potentially offset complications from Covid-19, aims to provide free flu jabs to 19 million people. But the ambitious undertaking has come under fire after 25 people died, including a 17-year-old boy and a man in his 70s, after participating in the program. The number jumped from 12 deaths reported earlier on Thursday.

The vaccination drive was suspended for three weeks after it was revealed that around five million doses, which require refrigeration, had been stored at room temperature while being transpired to a medical facility. The program resumed on October 13. None of the people who died received the recalled doses.

During a press conference on Thursday, Choi Dae-zip, president of the Korean Medical Association, requested that the flu shot campaign be put on hold until safety concerns about the vaccine could be properly addressed.

Read the full article at RT.com.

____________________

**Comment**

It has been found that getting the flu vaccine increases your risk of getting COVID-19 by 36%:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/23/flu-vaccine-increases-coronavirus-infection-risk-36/

This study explains that influenza vaccines can be contaminated with coronavirus proteins, which have high homology to SARS-CoV-2 proteins, as do chicken egg proteins as well. Influenza vaccine administration is known to create IgE mediated sensitization (allergy) to all proteins in the vaccine. In fact, vaccine-induced egg allergy is required for the vaccine to work and protect against influenza, because most influenza vaccines lack an adjuvant so depend upon the allergic reaction at the injection site.  https://zenodo.org/record/3997694#.X5NJni2ZOWg

Important excerpt:

Upon COVID-19 infection, patients will suffer an allergic reaction due to cross reaction against SARS-CoV-2 proteins. This predictably produces anaphylaxis symptoms. Since the viral load increases over a few days, we have slow rolling anaphylaxis. The result is damage to multiple organs. Acute respiratory distress syndrome results from lung damage. Cardiac injury due to Kounis syndrome. Coagulation dysfunction, hypotension and shock are other possible outcomes. As in anaphylaxis treatment, epinephrine, histamine H1 and H2 blockers, etc. help prevent or treat these conditions.

A person has died from the COVID-19 vaccine as well:  https://www.theepochtimes.com/volunteer-in-covid-19-vaccine-trial-dies-in-health-officials

Excerpt:

A volunteer in AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine trial died in Brazil, the country’s health authority confirmed Wednesday.

Anvisa, the authority, said it wouldn’t stop the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus vaccine trials for now and is investigating the death.

The Washington Post, cited a Brazilian newspaper using unnamed sources alleging the patient did not receive the vaccine but rather died of COVID-19. According to the article, significant medical events are carefully assessed by trial investigators, an independent safety monitoring committee and the regulatory authorities. 

However, more keeps bubbling out and this article states:

It has since been reported that the man did receive the meningococcal vaccine used as a placebo in the trial instead of the experimental coronavirus vaccine, although no official confirmation has been released by AstraZeneca, which has cited privacy concerns for not making more information available to the public.1  https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/10/brazilian-doctor-dies-participating-in-astrazenecas-covid-19-vaccine-clinical-trial/

The trial was suspended last month after a participant developed an unexplained illness.

Please take the time to learn about the COVID-19 vaccine:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/05/covid-19-vaccine-explained/

Despite all of this, they want to enlist children in the COVID-19 vaccine trials:  https://www.ktvn.com/story/42797491/next-up-in-hunt-for-covid-19-vaccine-testing-shots-in-kids

For a CBS news story on the death in the COVID-19 vaccine trial:

http://  Approx. 2 Min

 

Airlines Test ‘Proof-of-Immunity’ Technology, Privacy Watchdogs Call It ‘Troubling’

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/airlines-proof-of-immunity-commonpass/

OCTOBER 13, 2020

Airlines Test ‘Proof-of-Immunity’ Technology, Privacy Watchdogs Call It ‘Troubling’

By Jeremy Loffredo

At least two airlines are testing CommonPass, a new technology designed to let passengers prove they’ve tested negative for COVID-19 before they fly.

Proponents tout the CommonPass technology as a panacea for global travel in a pandemic world. They hope that a public weary of COVID-19 lockdowns and restrictions — but still fearful of the virus — will embrace it.

But civil rights and privacy groups warn against any technology that monitors individuals’ movements and activities. That includes any digital health pass, like CommonPass, that can be adapted to provide proof of vaccination.

Here’s how CommonPass works. An individual takes a COVID-19 test at an approved lab, then uploads the results to a smartphone. At the airport, airline staff and border officials scan a QR code from the phone, which certifies that the passenger is COVID-19 free.

The groups behind CommonPass — Common Project Foundation and the World Economic Forum — say the technology has the potential to create a universal digital platform for COVID-19 testing that, if adopted across all governments, could hasten the reopening of international borders.

As it stands now, each government determines its own rules and procedures for quarantines and border entry. That’s unacceptable, according to the World Economic Forum’s head of mobility, Christoph Wolff. In a statement, Wolff said: “Individual national responses will not be sufficient to address this global crisis.”

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit that advocates for civil liberties in a digital world, takes a different view. In May, the group stated its opposition to any type of “immunity passport” that would require “people to present supposed proof of immunity to COVID-19 in order to access public spaces, work sites, airports, school or other venues.”

Electronic Frontier Foundation argues that such technology threatens privacy and “would be a significant step toward a system of national digital identification that can be used to collect and store our personal information and track our location.”

The American Civil Liberties Union similarly warned against “immunity surveillance infrastructure” and “conditioning travel on COVID-19 immunity.”

Still, proponents like Dr. Bradley Perkins, former chief strategy and innovation officer at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — and now chief medical officer for Common Project Foundation — argue that proof-of-immunity technology is the solution to opening up borders. Perkins told the travel magazine, Afar:

Without the ability to trust COVID-19 tests — and eventually vaccine records — across international borders, many countries will feel compelled to retain full travel bans and mandatory quarantines for as long as the pandemic persists.”

With suicides, clinical depression, domestic violence and small business closures on the rise during COVID-19 lockdowns and travel restrictions, will a public hungry for a “return to normal” side with civil liberties groups? Or will they see CommonPass as a reasonable trade-off for increased mobility and perceived safety?

We’ll soon find out. On Oct. 8, two airlines launched trial runs. United Airlines tested CommonPass with volunteers flying between New York and London. Cathay Pacific did the same for passengers flying between Hong Kong and Singapore. The U.S. Customs and Border Patrol and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention observed the process.

CommonPass said in a press release that after the trials it plans to expand to more airlines and routes across the globe. Right now it’s limited to certifying negative COVID-19 tests. But in the future, CommonPass will be able to certify proof of vaccination, the company said. This means that even if a future COVID-19 vaccine is not mandated globally, airlines could require CommonPass for anyone wishing to travel, domestically or internationally.

“The hope is that the CommonPass will ultimately help reduce or eliminate […] quarantine requirements,” according to the article in Afar.

The idea of deploying digital health technology on a global scale isn’t new. As far back as 2010, The Rockefeller Foundation — whose president, Rajiv Shah, once ran the vaccine financing operation for the Gates Foundation — simulated a series of plausible “scenario narratives” that might unfold in response to a pandemic.

The foundation described one of these scenarios as a “world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership.” The foundation lists biometric IDs as one element of this “more controlled world” where “citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy.”

The Rockefeller Foundation, which has ties to Big Pharma, has provided funding for Common Project Foundation, including through a $300,000 grant in 2019 and a $500,000 grant in 2020.

Common Project Foundation markets itself as “beholden to no one government.” Yet the project has deep ties to COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers, who will inevitably benefit if their products are mandated in order for people to travel across borders. The foundation partners directly with the Pfizer Foundation and Novartis Foundation, both founded by pharmaceutical manufacturers that have COVID-19 vaccines in development.

Common Project Foundation also works in partnership with the CARIN Alliance, a digital healthcare group affiliated with Pfizer.

Pfizer CEO Henry McKinell once hailed Klaus Schwab, founder and chairman of the World Economic Forum, as “a person dedicated to a truly noble cause.”

In his book, “COVID-19: The Great Reset,” Schwab echoes Bill Gates’ sentiment that “a full return to ‘normal’ cannot be envisaged before a vaccine is available.” Schwab also writes, “The next hurdle is the political challenge of vaccinating enough people worldwide with a high enough compliance rate despite the rise of anti-vaxxers.”

Jeremy Loffredo is a reporter for Children’s Health Defense.

 

“© [10/13/20] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

__________________

**Comment**

I find it interesting that former CDC’s Dr. Perkins, now the chief medical officer for Common Project Foundation, states that the reason for proof of immunity technology is needed due to inaccurate COVID tests.  The reason we have such poor COVID testing is due to the CDC!  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/27/cdcs-deadly-testing-fiasco-centralization-of-public-health-authority-a-threat-to-national-security/

Lyme disease testing has remained abysmal for over 40 years but still remains the ‘gold standard’!  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/01/study-cdcs-2-tier-lyme-testing-inaccurate-in-more-than-70-of-cases/

There are numerous reasons for this but in a nutshell, the CDC directly competes with the private sector and maligns anything that competes with their own lucrative products, including but not limited to testing:  

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/26/cdc-playbook-learning-from-lyme/

One other concerning issue being mentioned repeatedly is the desire for a ‘centralized’ ‘global’ response.  This is newspeak for control and censorship, which is already occurring at unprecedented levels:

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/28/health-passport-scandal-uk/

 
 
 
Patent #WO2020060606, which is described as a “Cryptocurrency System Using Body Activity Data,” senses body activity of the user.
Human body activity associated with a task provided to a user(1) may be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system. A server may provide a task to a device of a user which is communicatively coupled to the server(2). A sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device(3) of the user may sense body activity of the user. Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. The cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify if the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system(4), and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.”(5)  https://operation-nation.com/bill-gates-microsoft-file-patent-for-dystopian-body-activity-data-implants/
The patent states that “conditions set by the cryptocurrency system” can be awarded cryptocurrency to the user.  In other words, if you are a good boy or girl you get points.  What happens if you aren’t a good boy or girl?
Apple already has an app for all of this:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/18/coronavirus-covid-19-antibody-tests-do-you-really-want-one-think-hard-about-it-maybe-not/  It doesn’t matter if it’s the antibody test or the PCR.  They are both worthless and shouldn’t be used for diagnosis, let alone for quarantining people.
 

Early HCQ Associated with 53% Decreased Risk of COVID-19 Patient Transfer To ICU

https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)32175-5/fulltext#%20

Early Hydroxychloroquine but not Chloroquine use reduces ICU admission in COVID-19 patients

 
Open AccessPublished:September 29, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1460
This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

Highlights

  • After the global push for the use of Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine there is ongoing discussion about the effectivity of these drugs.
  • Findings of this observational study provide crucial data on a potential protective effect of Hydroxychloroquine in non-ICU, hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
  • Early treatment with HCQ on the first day of admission is associated with a reduced risk of 53% in transfer to the ICU for mechanical ventilation.
  • This protective effect was not observed for Chloroquine, therefore these drugs cannot be regarded as interchangeable.

Abstract

Background

The global push for the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) against COVID-19 resulted in an ongoing discussion about the effectivity and toxicity of these drugs. Recent studies report no effect of (H)CQ on 28 day-mortality. We investigated the effect of HCQ and CQ in hospitalized patients on the non-ICU COVID-ward.

Methods

A nationwide, observational cohort study was performed in The Netherlands. Hospitals were given the opportunity to decide independently on the use of three different COVID-19 treatment strategies: HCQ or CQ, or no treatment. We compared the outcome between these groups. The primary outcomes were 1) death on the COVID-19 ward, and 2) transfer to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Results

The analysis contained 1064 patients from 14 hospitals: 566 patients received treatment with either HCQ (n = 189) or CQ (n = 377), and 498 patients received no treatment. In a multivariate propensity matched weighted competing regression analysis, there was no significant effect of (H)CQ on mortality on the COVID-ward. HCQ however was associated with a significant decreased risk of transfer to the ICU (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.47, 95%CI = 0.27–0.82, p = 0.008), when compared to controls. This effect was not found in the CQ group (HR = 0.80; 95%CI = 0.55–1.15, p = 0.207), and remained significant after competing risk analysis.

Conclusion

The results of this observational study demonstrate a lack of effect of (H)CQ on non-ICU mortality. However, we show that the use of HCQ – but not CQ – is associated with 53% decreased risk of transfer of COVID-19 patients from the regular ward to the ICU. Recent prospective studies have reported on 28 days all-cause mortality only, therefore additional prospective data on the early effect of HCQ in preventing transfer to the ICU is still needed.

______________________

**Comment**

This poor drug has been scrutinized like no other – all because of severe conflicts of interest held by our public ‘authorities’. While it isn’t for everyone, and it must be utilized in a certain way, it has been shown repeatedly to work in certain populations. To ban it from use shows the underhanded way ‘authorities’ have dealt with it.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/01/rebuttal-on-huge-hcq-study-in-lancet/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/26/hydroxychloroquine-a-morality-tale/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/30/dr-meryl-nass-discovers-hydroxychloroquine-experiments-were-designed-to-kill-covid-patients-how-many-were-murdered/

BTW:  The favored golden calf – the expensive yet lucrative anti-viral Remdesivir our public ‘authorities’ are cashing in on is showing itself to be a dud:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/07/02/remdesivir-for-covid-19-not-backed-by-results/

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/massive-who-study-shows-remdesivir-doesnt-lower-covid-19-mortality?  Excerpt:

The highly anticipated WHO drug trial called Solidarity found that Gilead’s COVID-19 treatment, remdesivir, had no substantial effect on a COVID-19 patient’s chances of survival. It also found that three other therapeutics were similarly ineffective.

One of those was HCQ, although it has been shown in numerous other studies that if used appropriately, will benefit patients:  

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/08/new-report-turkeys-use-of-hcq-early-saves-lives-fauci-should-be-in-jail/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/13/another-1700-cured-of-covid-using-hcq/

Dr. Zelenko, a New York doctor, has successfully treated 1,450 COVID-19 patients with a 99% success rate using a cocktail of hydroxychloroquine, Zinc Sulfate and Azithromycin:  https://techstartups.com/2020/04/21/dr-vladimir-zelenko-now-treated-1450-coronavirus-patients-2-deaths-using-hydroxychloroquine-99-99-success-rate-latest-video-interview/  Video with Zelenko in link.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/07/20/how-a-false-hydroxychloroquine-narrative-was-created/

 

Experts Issue Serious Warnings About a COVID Vaccine

https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/german-microbiologist-and-medical-professor-issues-serious-warnings-about-a-covid-vaccine/

German Microbiologist and Medical Professor Issues Serious Warnings about a COVID Vaccine

October 20, 2020

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi. Image source.

Playing Russian Roulette with a Covid-19 Vaccine

by Richard Gale and Gary Null PhD
Progressive Radio Network

America, we need to have a conversation. It is a very serious and dire conversation that has been intentionally ignored and swept under the rug for far too long.

It concerns a dialogue that our entire mainstream media, in its conventional blindness, refuses to acknowledge.Yet its consequences are potentially severe and perhaps deadly.

It may not eventually have an impact upon you personally nor your health, but it will surely have a profound adverse effect upon someone you know or perhaps even a loved one.

It is time to finally agree on a very simple fact. It is a truth that needs to be driven into our nation’s collective consciousness:

Vaccination hesitancy and opposition didnot mysteriously appear out of a vacuous void.Nobody rubbed an Arabian lamp to release an anti-vaccine genie upon the public.

However, this is the image that our federal agencies, the medical establishment, your average pediatrician, the vaccine tsars such as Bill Gates and his ilk, and the media project upon the visual mental screen of our culture.

In effect they reify a false narrative on our behalf. In our opinion any hope that life will return to normal is now a pipedream. The pandemic has spurred too many other financially driven initiatives that are going to propel the redefinition of “normalcy” and none of these measures will benefit the average person.

Rather than engage in open dialogue to reevaluate the causes for vaccination hesitancy, which has been increasing substantially and especially after the first announcements to develop a Covid-19 vaccine, the pro-vaccination regime has been focusing its attention on how to launch counter-measures to reinvigorate popular faith in vaccines.

Common sense should tell us this is the wrong discussion.

The only real genies that have appeared in the vaccine vials themselves have been responsible for vaccine injuries, an epidemic of neurological disorders in our children, weakened immune systems, life-long autoimmune conditions and deaths.

Every parent with a vaccine-injured child at one time placed their complete faith in the safety of the vaccines that their children received. Wholeheartedly they believed the medical establishment. They believed their pediatricians and school health officials.

And they listened intently to the television talking heads who convinced them with scare tactics to get vaccinated for whatever infectious outbreak was being reported that particular week.

Therefore there are very rational reasons, also based on a large body of scientific evidence, for why vaccine hesitancy is on the rise. Our federal health agencies, in particular the CDC and FDA, and certainly the drug makers, have done nothing forthrightly to earn our trust.

Nor should we be sucker punched into handing it over to them during this pandemic.

Many people are now eager to see a Covid-19 vaccine available under the hopeful assumption that their lives will return to 2019 before the pandemic was declared. Many are also willing to sacrifice themselves as guinea pigs in these vaccine clinical trials.

As admirable as their courage may be, we must ask whether it is founded on a sound understanding of vaccine risks or is it simply an emotional reaction to the panic that has been orchestrated by our government’s health officials, the tsars of the vaccination imperium such as Bill Gates, the World Health Organization and those voices doing the bidding of the industrial pharmaceutical complex.

Not every expert in the fields of immunology, virology and genetics is buying into the Covid-19 vaccine frenzy.But sadly their voices are either muffled in the louder noise of panic control and medical propaganda or worse are being ignored or censored altogether.

Yet they too now more than ever need to have a seat at the table.Not every problem requires a technological medical solution, and more often than not the irrational rush for such technological remedies makes matters far worse and costs more lives.

Lets consider one important voice now being ignored.

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is no nickel-dime physician. He has practiced medicine for five decades, was a post-doctoral researcher at one of the world’s most prestigious research institutes, the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, and later held the Microbiology Chair at the University of Mainz in Germany for a dozen years.

He has impeccable credentials that in our opinion outweigh many of our so-called medical experts preaching from their official soapboxes.

Dr. Bhakdi is not anti-vaccine, however he is deeply worried about the new technologies for a Covid-19 vaccine being rushed to market. One of the greatest fears being heard over the internet is that these new gene-based vaccines will recombine with our body’s DNA and cause untold health problems.But this worries Bhakdi less than other far greater risks with life-long debilitating consequences.

First, there is the possibility of mutagenesis, or mutations occurring due to the insertion of the vaccine’s viral-based gene. This is especially worrisome given the possibility that these insertions could occur in reproductive cells and will thereby be inherited by future children. These were among the safety concerns raised by the Paul Ehrlich Institut in Germany and published in the journal Methods in Molecular Biology.

Second, there is a very real danger that our body’s immune system will identify this inserted genetic material as a foreign invader and create anti-DNA antibodies that will in turn trigger an autoimmune disease. There is no certainty that an adverse autoimmune response will occur immediately or even shortly after vaccination.

It may take one, two, three or more years before the vaccinated person lapses into a serious, or even life-threatening, autoimmune condition. There are over 80 different autoimmune illnesses; it is a toss of the dice as to which might appear. Nevertheless in the case of such an event, the gene-based Covid-19 vaccine cannot be ruled out as a fundamental cause.

And don’t place any bets that you will be properly diagnosed if symptoms of a chronic autoimmune disease begin to appear.During the annual European League Against Rheumatism conference in 2018, two papers were delivered that should frighten us far more than Covid.

Separate studies found that approximately 95 percent of patients were misdiagnosed on at least one occasion after displaying autoimmune symptoms. About thirty-five percent were told it was psychosomatic, “all in their head.”

How many parents have been told by their pediatricians after the collapse of their child into mental despondency shortly after receiving one or more vaccinations that it has nothing to do with a vaccine and is their genes or another cause?

Then there is a third and even more “terrible” danger with these new vaccines.It is wise to give heed to Dr. Bhakdi’s warnings in his book Corona False Alarm? Facts and Figures (Chelsea Green):

“… during or after production of the viral spike, waste products of the [virus’] protein must be expected to become exposed on the surface of the targeted cells [i.e., cells which the virus has latched onto]. The majority of healthy individuals have killer lymphocytes that recognize these viral [waste] products. It is inevitable that autoimmune attacks will be mounted against the cells. Where, when and with which effects this might occur is entirely unknown. But the prospects are simply terrifying.”

Although early research shows DNA and mRNA vaccines have benefits over the current cultured viral vaccines because of their high potency, they are still experimental. Much remains unknown.

And because this new generation of vaccines are very recent, there is no reliable data to reach a medical consensus about their safety profile nor their potential long-term adverse risks.

It is Dr. Bhakdi’s belief that a Covid-19 vaccine is completely unwarranted. An important fact people fail to realize is that the vaccine will not necessarily prevent you from contracting the virus. Instead you are more likely to not fall ill.

However, you can still contract the virus and remain a spreader and infect others.The only incentive for a Covid-19 vaccine is that it is an enormous cash cow for the drug industry.

Each of us should be deeply concerned about the above potential adverse effects from a Covid-19 vaccine.Vaccination policy is supposed to be based upon concise benefit-risk analyses.

Sadly, this has never been a firm policy implemented in the US and it has been a factor largely denied by the majority of the medical community.

Every vaccination is a game of Russian roulette

Every vaccination is a game of Russian roulette. For safer vaccines there may be 10,000 or even 100,000 chambers in the syringe-shaped revolver but there is always that one live bullet.

For other less safe vaccines such as Gardasil, MMR and DpT the odds for that single bullet drop dramatically. As in the case of Merck’s Gardasil the results can be catastrophic; for this reason Robert Kennedy Jr. has filed a major lawsuit against the vaccine’s maker.And so far, the future prospects of a truly safe Covid-19 vaccine appear to be far off into the distant horizon if ever.

So why such concern over a Covid-19 vaccine?

Following AstraZeneca’s Covid-19 vaccine clinical trial it was reported that at least one participant had a very serious vaccine injury.

“The highest levels of NIH are very concerned,” reported the pro-Pharma news site Fierce Biotech.

Yet British health authorities permitted the trial to resume.

And this is where the event becomes insidious.No information about the nature of the injury nor its severity has been made public.The company has argued it cannot release further information because of patient privacy.

In other words, despite the government being the appendage that will distribute the vaccine, for the maker’s financial benefit, it has no leverage to review the injuries from the clinical trials.

US health officials have come to the conclusion that the participant was diagnosed with vaccine-induced transverse myelitis, a debilitating inflammation of both sides of the spinal cord.AstraZeneca’s Covid-19 vaccine is

“a weakened version of a common cold virus (adenovirus) from chimpanzees that has been genetically changed so it is impossible for it to grow in humans.”

Or so the Participant Information Sheet for the vaccine trial alleges.

It is also worth noting that anyone with a history of immunosuppression, immunodeficiency, angioedema, anaphylaxis, cardiovascular condition, gastrointestinal disease, liver or renal disease, a neurological illness or a psychiatric condition, allergies, a cancer diagnosis, alcohol or drug dependency, is pregnant, or received another vaccine within 30 days was excluded from participating in the trial.

Of course, this is not unusual. This is not an uncommon list of exclusionary conditions used during all vaccine trial recruitments to assure that only the healthiest people are enrolled that in turn reduces substantially the likelihood of adverse reactions.

Nevertheless, once launched, the vaccine will be distributed indiscriminately to everyone, except in cases of very severe prior medical conditions.

This week it was reported that an adverse reaction occurred during Johnson’s and Johnson’s Covid-19 vaccine trial. Information about the actual diagnosis of the participant’s adverse reaction remains unknown.

But the case must be extremely serious because it signaled a high red alert and J&J halted its trial with 60,000 enrolled participants. Vaccine-related injuries, and even casualties, are not uncommon in such trials.J&J’s press release stated it is conducting an investigation internally – meaning that outside authorities without conflicts-of-interest are again excluded – in order “to respect this participant’s privacy.”

Similar to AstraZeneca’s vaccine, J&J’s relies upon a genetic engineered vector of a human adenovirus which infects our cells and then delivers the engineered blueprint it is carrying. The company plans to manufacture more than 1 billion doses for global distribution to almost a seventh of the world’s population.

Finally, there is Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine that is based on mRNA technology, a trick of genetic engineering with lipid nanoparticles (LNP) that when injected turn our bodies into their own vaccine manufacturing factories.

There seems to be more secrecy behind this company over the others. Moderna managed to get past the hurdle of animal testing and leap right into human clinical trials.

However, according to a preliminary article in the New England Journal of Medicine, 80 percent of the participants in the moderate and high dose trial groups reported moderate to severe adverse reactions. If we take a look at Moderna’s Form S-1 Registration submitted to the US Securities and Exchange Commission we discover:

“[T]here can be no assurance that our LNPs [lipid nanoparticles] will not have undesired effects. Our LNPs could contribute, in whole or in part, to one or more of the following: immune reactions, infusion reactions, complement reactions, opsonation reactions, antibody reactions . . . or reactions to the PEG [a synthetic vaccine ingredient]…

Certain aspects of our investigational medicines may induce immune reactions from either the mRNA or the lipid as well as adverse reactions within liver pathways or degradation of the mRNA or the LNP, any of which could lead to significant adverse events in one or more of our clinical trials.”

This Form S-1 was filed back in November 2019 and therefore serious risks of mRNA vaccines have been well known for a sufficient length of time to elicit grave caution.

All three of these companies’ Covid-19 vaccines are now included in Trump’s Operation Warp Speed.Bill Gates, who is heavily invested in all of these vaccines, is eager to profit over their future prospects.

“We need to make billions of doses,” Gates wrote on his blog page, “we need to get them out to every part of the world, and we need all of this to happen as quickly as possible.”

We might add: and, damn the regulations and high safety standards that could hinder us.

Don’t count upon the mainstream media to educate you about any of this

And one final warning. Don’t count upon the mainstream media to educate you about any of this.

In the event you or a loved one is injured or contracts a life-long autoimmune illness from one of these new Covid-19 vaccines, lower your hopes and expectations that you will be rewarded, if at all, with adequate compensation for damages.

As a consequence of Reagan’s 1986 National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, the drug companies – and make no mistake, vaccines are also drugswere left off the hook from any legal liability due to vaccine-related injuries and deaths.

Don’t rely upon our word. This is recently from the media darling of the pharmaceutical dynasty, the Wall Street Journal, in its article “People Harmed by Coronavirus Vaccines Will Have Little Recourse,”

“The U.S. government paid out $4.4 billion over more than 30 years covering injuries relating to a host of vaccines—from flu to polio—but payouts for potential injuries from Covid-19 vaccines will be covered by a far less-generous program. Covid-19 vaccine injuries will be covered under a program known as the “countermeasures injury” compensation fund… The new fund has a tougher threshold for proving a relationship between an injury and the vaccine, experts say. The newer fund has a shorter statute of limitations, no avenue for appeals and doesn’t pay damages for pain or suffering like the older vaccine program does.”

The Journal article continues with reporting on the aggressive efforts underway by the vaccine companies to secure additional protection from personal liability due to vaccine injuries.

In other words, they are preparing for a worse case scenario.

Do you have a fuller picture now of the larger stakes behind national governments’ hasty release of a Covid-19 vaccine?

Now ask yourself why a more open and public discussion is not being conducted to address the evidence for these very legitimate concerns and fears. The warnings stated herein warrant a rise in vaccine hesitancy and opposition across the public landscape.

The conspiracy theorists are not the parents caring for neurologically damaged children for the remainder of their lives. The real denialists are those in the mainstream media who are too lazy, biased or lack a moral conscience to perform proper due diligence and mine the scientific literature for answers.

Do yourself a favor. Simply don’t listen to them.

And when Gates, Fauci, Trump, Biden or any state governor begin talking about the “awesome” promises of a Covid-19 vaccine or its mandate, turn off your television or computer screen.

These people are only the profiteers protecting the vaccine makers and in the event of vaccine injuries we are just collateral damage in the “War Against Corona.”

Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.

About the Authors

Richard Gale is the Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network and a former Senior Research Analyst in the biotechnology and genomic industries.

Dr. Gary Null is the host of America’s longest running public radio program on alternative and nutritional health and a multi-award-winning documentary film director, including War on Health and more recently Last Call for Tomorrow.

_______________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/05/covid-19-vaccine-explained/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/08/covid-vaccine-wont-bring-about-fairytale-ending-to-pandemic-expert-warns/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/12/operation-warp-speed-is-using-a-cia-linked-contractor-to-keep-covid-19-vaccine-contracts-secret/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/22/a-darpa-funded-implantable-covid-19-detecting-biochip-to-use-5g/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/24/studies-show-proper-levels-of-vitamin-d-slashes-risk-of-covid-as-does-gargling-with-iodine-vaccine-not-needed/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/02/covid19-pcr-a-test-that-tells-you-your-body-is-the-enemy-a-vaccine-would-be-death-by-1000-cuts/

Italian doctor (Dr. Roberto Petrella) gives harrowing admissions and facts on COVID testing and the vaccine:  https://www.instagram.com/tv/CEVzFLUnuHS/  (Approx. 4 Min.)

“I will prefer death, absolutely not vaccination.”  Dr. Tommy John

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/30/proof-that-the-pandemic-was-planned-with-purpose/

A Primer For the Media on Viruses, Vaccines, and COVID-19

https://www.aier.org/article/a-primer-for-the-media-on-viruses-vaccines-and-covid-19/

– September 25, 2020

tutorial, reporter

2020 is a year when many things besides people have died, or at least placed on indefinite life support. Music and most arts and culture (at least audience-based), education, a person’s livelihood, social trust and interaction, common sense and common decency, debate, and we can include responsible journalism to the list. 

In fact, responsible journalism was one of the first casualties of 2020 and bears responsibility for much of the rest.  (See link for article)

_________________________

**Comment**

Fantastic read!  Highly recommend.

The author, a PhD in chemistry who worked in pharmaceutical development, biopharmaceuticals, vaccines, and then consulting, is highly qualified to speak on these topics.

He visited Hong Kong during SARS (which had no lockdowns, distancing, mask mandates, etc) and had the privilege of talking with Dr. Henderson, a leading researcher involved with smallpox eradication efforts and with the Dept. of Homeland Security.  He states Henderson would be completely opposed to the current draconian policies in place for COVID.

He also says that the light went completely out on responsible journalism and that power has yet to be restored.  

He particularly picks out a Yahoo article with the opening sentence that had the following glaringly inaccurate phrase in it:

vaccine to wipe out the deadly coronavirus….

He states this is irresponsible and misinformed journalism and goes on to state that first, the coronavirus is not very deadly at all based upon data, medical reports, and general knowledge.  But, the media is all about only reporting the most serious symptoms and hype.

He points out the bad modeling that was pushed and followed by governments despite the fact that the mortality of Covid is consistent with influenza as proven by serology studies that define a baseline number of people who have experienced the virus and NOT on testing since far more people have had it than the numbers show, not to mention the fact COVID testing is abysmal and is wrong more than half the time.

He points out that CDC numbers are based upon calculations of expected mortality.

Important excerpt:

The current number of reported deaths related to Covid is about 180,000, although that number is maybe meaningless because there is no consistency in reporting and we do not know how deaths are being recorded. Just because a person dies and maybe they have the virus does NOT mean that the virus or even a complication was the cause of death. 

He also points out that it’s important to carefully analyze facts, setting aside emotion and that by doing this, mistakes, such as was made with the elderly who needlessly died due to horrible policies, can be avoided.

Regarding the inaccurate phrase about ‘a vaccine wiping out the deadly coronavirus,’ he reminds the reader that vaccines are NOT cures or preventatives. He reminds us the influenza vaccine has not stopped the flu.

He states that a vaccine only acts as a primer to the immune system, allowing it to respond quicker and more efficiently to a disease it has been previously exposed to, hopefully giving the immune system an edge. He reminds that a vaccine does not block a virus from entering the body or wipe a virus out.

He also gives a table showing flu vaccine effectiveness which is below 50% most of the time.

He gives the following important take aways:

  • SARS-COV-2 is not deadly. It only leads to death in a very well defined group.
  • COVID mortality has little impact on expected mortality rate since the affected group has a very low life expectancy. Any increases in mortality are much more likely to be due to drug overdoses and suicidesboth considered collateral damage of COVID policies 
  • Those who had COVID or are healthy do not need a vaccine. They also do not need to wear any face covering. This constitutes 99% of the population.
  • Between 75-90% of the highest risk population survive
  • It is important to keep a healthy immune system as viruses can mutate
  • Vaccine decisions are personal.  The government should not be making that decision for anyone.