Archive for the ‘Treatment’ Category

Yes, SARS-CoV-2 Is a Real Virus

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/01/17/sars-cov-2-real-virus.aspx

Yes, SARS-CoV-2 Is a Real Virus

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked

January 17, 2022

Story at-a-glance –

  • SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated, photographed, genetically sequenced, and exists as a pathogenic entity
  • The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention grows the virus in cell culture to ensure widespread availability for researchers who want to study it
  • At least part of the confusion appears to be rooted in how the term “isolated” is defined. Some insist a virus is not isolated unless it’s also purified, while others say a virus doesn’t have to be purified in order to be “isolated”
  • Another sticking point for some is whether or not SARS-CoV-2 has ever been isolated from a human subject without passing it through animal cells, as such media could be contaminated and therefore the source of the virus
  • Researchers have verified that the genetic sequence of the virus obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, a global resource center for reference microorganisms, is an exact match to the virus found in people with symptomatic COVID-19

While some still claim SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t actually exist, this seems to fly in the face of several well-established facts. The virus has actually been photomicrographed,1,2 whole-genome sequences of the various strains are available,3,4 and with the appropriate credentials anyone can obtain the live virus to conduct research.

While I am absolutely no fan of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, they do grow the virus in cell culture to ensure widespread availability for researchers who want to study it.5 Examples of research where you need the actual virus include antiviral research, vaccine development, virus stability research and pathogenesis research.6

What’s the Confusion?

At least part of the confusion appears to be rooted in how the term “isolated” is defined. Some insist a virus is not isolated unless it’s also purified, while others say a virus doesn’t have to be purified in order to be “isolated.”

Steve Kirsch claims to have asked several experts about this, noting that all, including Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Li-Meng Yan, say that the virus has indeed been “isolated.” “So, it has been ‘isolated’ according to their belief in what the term means,” Kirsch writes, adding:7

“Others interpret the term differently and would claim the virus hasn’t been isolated. In fact, according to their definition, no virus in history has ever been isolated. That’s important to know. They use that as justification for their belief that there is no virus here since viruses don’t exist at all.”

When Kirsch asked his readers for input, one pointed out:8

“The real question is … has it been isolated from a HUMAN subject w/o passing it through (say) Monkey Kidney Cells? Because there is plenty of evidence out there that says it hasn’t been isolated directly (no intermediaries) from a HUMAN subject.”

According to Kirsch, the scientists he spoke with did not agree that this was a concern, and “Sabine Hazan verified that the sequence of the virus obtained from ATCC [the American Type Culture Collection, a global resource center for reference microorganisms] matched exactly what she found in people who have the virus.”9

As noted in Hazan’s paper, “Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Patient Fecal Samples by Whole Genome Sequencing”:10

“Study participants underwent testing for SARS-CoV-2 from fecal samples by whole genome enrichment NGS [next-generation sequencing] (n = 14), and RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab analysis (n = 12).

The concordance of SARS-CoV-2 detection by enrichment NGS from stools with RT-PCR nasopharyngeal analysis was 100%. Unique variants were identified in four patients, with a total of 33 different mutations among those in which SARS-CoV-2 was detected by whole genome enrichment NGS.”

Germ Theory and Terrain Theory Both Have Merit

As noted by independent journalist and political analyst Jeremy Hammond in a March 2021 interview,11 the claim that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated and actually doesn’t exist at all is perhaps one of the most counterproductive arguments of the health freedom movement.

By insisting that there is no virus, and that COVID-19 is caused by things like 5G radiation alone, allows the mainstream media to dismiss entirely legitimate concerns about electromagnetic field exposure (EMF) and 5G — including the possibility that it might make some people more vulnerable to infections.

Like Hammond, I believe the pathogenesis of COVID-19 involves both germ theory and terrain theory, not just one or the other. “SARS-CoV-2 infection is an insufficient but necessary factor in the pathogenesis of COVID-19,” Hammond says, adding that “the virus is constantly being isolated and whole genome sequenced by scientists all over the world.”12

COVID-19 pandemic should be a wake-up call to the human population, and especially the populations of developed countries, about the need to focus on natural means of maintaining good health and living in greater harmony with our natural environment. ~ Jeremy Hammond

That said, environmental factors can clearly play a role, in that they can make you more or less predisposed to severe infection when you encounter this virus. This includes EMFs, toxins like glyphosate, previous vaccine injuries and much more.

Indeed. And, as Hammond points out, pathogenic challenge is absolutely necessary for general good health and strong immunity. When we shield ourselves too much from everyday pathogens, we make ourselves vulnerable to chronic diseases instead.

SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequencing From Italy

As for whether SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and exists as a viral entity, the answer appears to be yes. For example, an Italian paper13 published in the Journal of Virology, dated May 18, 2020, detailed the isolation and full-length genome of the virus taken from COVID-19 patients in Italy:

“At the beginning of March 2020, the first nasopharyngeal swabs positive for SARS-CoV-2 started to be detected in the Northern Eastern Region of Friuli-Venezia Giulia … Swab contents were seeded on Vero E6 cells and monitored for cytopathic effect and by an RT-PCR protocol using primers for the N region.

Cell culture supernatants from passage 1 (P1) of four isolates were collected, and RNA was extracted with QIAamp viral RNA minikit (Qiagen) and quantified with an in vitro-transcribed RNA standard … The quantity and quality of the RNA were assessed … For each sample, 100 ng of total RNA was processed using Zymo-Seq RiboFree ribosomal depletion library preparation kit (Zymo Research).

All the obtained libraries passed quality check and were quantified before being pooled at equimolar concentration and sequenced … Sequenced reads that passed the quality check (Phred score ≥30) were adaptor and quality trimmed, and the remaining reads were assembled de novo using Megahit (v.1.2.9) with default parameter settings.

Megahit generated in all cases 7 contigs with more than 1,000 bp and 100× coverage; all of these assembled contigs were compared (using BLASTn) against the entire nonredundant (nr) nucleotide and protein databases.

In all cases the longest and more covered contigs were identified as MT019532.1,14 ‘Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate BetaCoV/Wuhan/IPBCAMS-WH-04/2019, complete genome,’ with 99% identity and 0 gaps.

The longer sequences were named hCoV-19/Italy/FVG/ICGEB_S1, _S5, _S8, and _S9 and were deposited in GISAID … Sequence analysis showed an uneven coverage along the SARS-CoV-2 genome, with an average range from 126 to 7,576 reads and a mean coverage per sample of 1,169× … Phylogenetic trees were inferred using the maximum likelihood method …

The first sequences deposited in GISAID (EPI_ISL_410545 and EPI_ISL_410546) were collected in Rome from a Chinese tourist from Hubei province who got infected before visiting Italy, and another one (EPI_ISL_412974) was from a test-positive Italian citizen returning from China.

Only two sequences were reported from the Lombardy cluster (EPI_ISL_412973 and EPI_ISL_413489). In this report four additional sequences from cases epidemiologically linked to northern Italy have been examined … Sequence analysis showed a good coverage along the SARS-CoV-2 genome for all four isolates.

Based on the marker variant S D614G, all four sequences grouped in the Bavarian rooted subclade G, which is dominant in Europe, including the sequence from Lombardy, but distinct from the three sequences mentioned above originating directly from China.

Intriguingly, the new isolates were more closely related to EPI_ISL_412973, while EPI_ISL_413489 was more distant. No evidence could be found for the putative 382-nucleotide (nt) deletion in ORF8 detected in Singapore, which has been proposed to indicate an attenuated phenotype.”

SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequencing From Germany

Similarly, the complete genome sequence of the virus taken from a German woman has been published, this one in the journal Microbiology Resource Announcements, in June 2020.

Here, an oropharyngeal swab sample from a female patient who tested positive but had no symptoms at the time of the test was used to isolate the strain.15 Table 1 in the paper compares the nucleotide variants found in the sampled virus and those of a reference strain already logged in the gene bank.

Another paper16 in Annals of Internal Medicine, published in August 2020, isolated the virus from ocular (eye) secretions of an Italian COVID patient:17

“The patient, a 65-year-old woman, travelled from Wuhan, China, to Italy on 23 January 2020 and was admitted on 29 January 2020, 1 day after symptom onset. At admission to the high isolation unit … she presented with nonproductive cough, sore throat, coryza, and bilateral conjunctivitis. She had no fever until day 4, when fever (38 °C), nausea, and vomiting began.

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 was confirmed by performing real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay on sputum samples (cycle threshold value [Ct], 16.1) on the admission day, followed by viral M gene sequencing (GenBank accession number MT008022), and virus isolation on Vero E6 cell line (2019-nCoV/Italy-INMI1).

The full genome sequence was obtained from either clinical sample or culture isolate (GISAID accession numbers EPI_ISL_410545 and EPI_ISL_410546).”

Genome Sequencing From India and Colombia

SARS-CoV-2 has also been isolated from the urine of a COVID-19 patient.18 A November 2020 paper19 sought to determine “whether various clinical specimens obtained from COVID-19 patients contain the infectious virus,” and found SARS-CoV-2 RNA “in all naso/oropharyngeal swabs and saliva, urine and stool samples collected between Days 8 and 30 of the clinical course.”

Viable SARS-CoV-2 was also found in the nasal washes of ferrets that had been inoculated with urine or stool from a COVID-19 patient. The virus has also been isolated by researchers in the U.S.,20 China,21 India,22 Canada,23 Australia,24 Korea25 and Colombia.26 The Colombian paper reads in part:27

“Objective: To describe the isolation and characterization of an early SARS-CoV-2 isolate from the epidemic in Colombia. Materials and methods: A nasopharyngeal specimen from a COVID-19 positive patient was inoculated on different cell lines.

To confirm the presence of SARS-CoV-2 on cultures we used qRT-PCR, indirect immunofluorescence assay, transmission and scanning electron microscopy, and next-generation sequencing.

Results: We determined the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in Vero-E6 cells by the appearance of the cytopathic effect three days post-infection and confirmed it by the positive results in the qRT-PCR and the immunofluorescence with convalescent serum.

Transmission and scanning electron microscopy images obtained from infected cells showed the presence of structures compatible with SARS-CoV-2. Finally, a complete genome sequence obtained by next-generation sequencing allowed classifying the isolate as B.1.5 lineage.

The evidence presented in this article confirms the first isolation of SARSCoV-2 in Colombia. In addition, it shows that this strain behaves in cell culture in a similar way to that reported in the literature for other isolates and that its genetic composition is consistent with the predominant variant in the world.”

If Virus Exists, Why Aren’t Certain Studies Done?

As mentioned earlier, the actual virus is needed in order to conduct certain studies. Now, since the virus does exist, we also ought to be able to conduct studies to assess whether the COVID shots cause antibody dependent enhancement (ADE).

As suggested by Kirsch,28 “Give the vaccine to the animals, wait, then expose them to the virus” and see what happens. Does it prevent infection and transmission, or does it make the animals more prone to infection? If the animals got sicker, that would be evidence of ADE, a problem that has plagued coronavirus vaccine research for decades.

It’s why we don’t have a vaccine against the common cold, caused by coronaviruses. Remarkably, this animal research has never been done for the COVID shots. The question is why? Kirsch believes the answer is because “nobody wants to know the answer ... The top management of the FDA knows it would kill the vaccine program if they did this.”

On the other hand, the vaccinated, just like the unvaccinated, tend to experience only mild symptoms with Omicron. So, perhaps the shots aren’t causing ADE (which could turn even a milder variant into something deadly).

However, ADE is far from the only concern. Clearly, these shots are associated with a dramatically increased risk of cardiovascular, cardiac and neurological problems. These too could be confirmed through animal studies — rather than testing on our children — and we wouldn’t even need the virus for those.

Either way, I believe it’s scientifically accurate to claim that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated, genetically sequenced, and that it exists as a pathogenic entity. Getting too far into the weeds of theories that refute the existence of viruses altogether will only slow down and hamper the truth movement rather than aid it along, and I would strongly discourage anyone from engaging in this highly unproductive narrative.

– Sources and References
1, 7, 8, 28 Steve Kirsch Substack January 9, 2022

2 NPR January 24, 2020

3 Gen Bank SARS-CoV-2 isolate, complete genome

4 ATCC Coronavirus

5, 6 CDC Viral Culturing

9, 10 Gut Pathogens 2021; 13(7)

11, 12 Jeremy Hammond March 9, 2021

13 Journal of Virology May 18, 2020 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00543-20

14 MT019532.1

15 Microbiology Resource Announcements June 2020; 9(23): e00520-20

16, 17 Annals of Internal Medicine August 4, 2020 DOI: 10.7326/M20-1176

18 Emerging Microbes & Infections December 2020; 9(1):991-993

19 Clinical Microbiology & Infections November 2020;26(11):1520-1524

20 BioRxiv March 7, 2020 DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.02.972935

21 CCDC Weekly February 15, 2020 DOI: 10.46234/ccdcw2020.033

22 Indian Journal of Medical Research February & March 2020; 151(2 & 3):244-250

23 Emerging Infectious Diseases September 2020; 26(9): 2054–2063

24 The Medical Journal of Australia July 28, 2021

25 Osong Public Health Research Perspectives February 2020; 11(1): 3-7

26, 27 Biomedica October 30, 2020; 40(Supl. 2):148-158

__________________

**Comment**

Much of virology is above my pay-grade; however, I too believe that both the germ theory and terrain theory are important, play a role is disease, and also help explain the complexity of Lyme/MSIDS (and virtually every other disease) that the ‘powers that be’ continue to ignore. Disease is never simple. But, this fact doesn’t help and therefore isn’t acknowledged by Big Pharma who continues to push the one germ, one drug mantra which of course our government is in lockstep with as they own patents on the products they provide guidance over. This is why there has been severe censorship on supplements and cheap treatments for COVID.

Many in the public are unaware of the major controversy surrounding everything COVID, and that a doctor’s group has sued the FDA for their interference regarding HCQ, and Fauci has been accused of a misinformation campaign against it. Other doctors have used it quite successfully, but this doesn’t matter to ‘the powers that be.’ Doctors prescribing these things are hunted down and persecuted by medical groups that are also in bed with Big Pharma.

That said, viruses have been used by corrupt public health ‘authorities’ for decades for their vested interests. The main reasons include lucrative tests, vaccines, and treatments that they profit from. Until public health authorities are not allowed to own patents on the very things they control and create public policy on, we will never have transparency in public health.

I posed previously that China’s Chief epidemiologist is on record stating,

“They didn’t isolate the virus, and that is the problem.” ~ Dr. Wu Zunyou

So there is disagreement on this topic even among experts.

COVID testing is not validated, does not differentiate, can not identify variants, and is not authorized to show contagiousness.  So proof remains illusive.

Go here for an excellent article on the history of the PCR test (never intended to diagnose patients), and the virus isolation/purification issue.  Understanding the mismanagement of testing and “viruses” is paramount for today.

So whether you believe the virus was isolated/purified or not, the important take-away is there has been devastating, fraudulent political use of viruses which has absolutely nothing to do with public health.

Category:

Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Clinical Spectrum of Persistent Bartonella Infection and Considerations in Diagnosis & Treatment

http://  Approx. 53 Min

Dr B Robert Mozayeni,
2nd European Crypto-Infections Conference
26th-27th September 2020,
via Zoom

For more:

Category:

Bartonella, Testing, Treatment

Chronic UTIs and Interstitial Cystitis

https://www.betterhealthguy.com/episode158  Podcast Here

Episode #158: Chronic UTIs and Interstitial Cystitis with Ruth Kriz, MSN, APRN

Last Updated: December 14 2021

Why You Should Listen

In this episode, you will learn about chronic UTIs and Interstitial Cystitis.

Watch The Show

Listen To The Show

About My Guest

My guest for this episode is Ruth Kriz. Utilizing her functional medicine background as well as experience in microbiology and teaching pharmacology, Ruth Kriz, MSN, APRN has spent the majority of her professional career as a Nurse Practitioner working with Chronic UTI and Interstitial Cystitis patients. Her practice expanded to patients from almost all the states in the US as well as from 35 countries who came to her seeking answers beyond symptom management. Through molecular testing, an understanding of the genetics common to these patients, and an understanding of how this contributes to chronic infection and biofilms, she has been able to successfully treat this population. These factors have broad implications for other chronic infections (sinus, prostate, ear infections, wounds, etc.) as well as fibromyalgia, cardiovascular disease, and other conditions in which biofilms are an important contributor. She has closed her medical practice, but she has reinvented as a consultant to help practitioners learn how to utilize her approach for curing these patients.

Key Takeaways

  • How do chronic UTIs evolve into Interstitial Cystitis (IC) over time?
  • What are the primary contributors to chronic UTIs and IC?
  • How is the potential for infection best explored in these conditions?
  • What types of microbes are commonly found in these patients?
  • Do chronic Lyme disease and mold illness play a role in these conditions?
  • What are the key genetic contributors?
  • What role does ammonia play in creating the right environment for microbial overgrowth?
  • How might Nrf2 support be helpful in treating these conditions?
  • What is the role of hypercoagulation and biofilm?
  • How does vitamin D impact these conditions?
  • Is MCAS involved in chronic UTIs and IC?
  • Are oxalates a primary contributor?
  • What are some of the treatment options to explore?
  • Why is detoxification support important?
  • What is the prognosis for those dealing with chronic UTIs and IC?

Connect With My Guest

https://RuthKriz.com

See link for transcript

For more:

Category:

Lyme, Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS), Supplements, Treatment

Dr. Ruby: No Validated COVID Test, Rapid Antigen Test Not Specific, Can You Get COVID Again? Monoclonal Antibodies, Vaxxed Blood, Vial Batches, & Nebulized Peroxide Treatment

https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/01/ask-dr-jane-worldwide-pcr-fraud-blood-cell-death-staying-healthy/  Video Here (Approx. 13 Min)

Ask Dr. Jane

The Stew Peters Show

Jan. 12, 2022

Great, practical information within this video.  Please watch.

Summary:

  • Starting at 1:00 Dr. Jane discusses “chain of custody,” or the process and verification of how an object moves from point A to point B. There are special procedures for moving samples to and from a lab for screening. COVID injection vials also have “chain of custody” where they are signed for and carefully followed.
  • At 2:20 Dr. Ruby discusses that in her experience those getting COVID again (which again, can’t be verified due to the PCR fraud occurring and the inability to know if something truly is COVID) have had experimental monoclonal antibodies or the jab.  Getting the antibodies is like renting an army for a day. They come in, clean house, but then go away.  On the other-hand, the soldiers in your immune system stay around, continuing to clean house as needed.  Those getting the jab are catching every little cold bug or flu that’s going around.
  • at 4:30 Dr. Ruby discusses the doctors looking at “vaxxed” blood continue to follow up with patients, and at 5:04, they show a slide with strange, irregular, compact blood vessels.  The patients are also doing worse clinically – struggling with weakness, fatigue, severe illnesses, autoimmunity, and even hospitalizations. Doctors looking at vial ingredients have revealed horrific findings.
  • at 6:45, they discuss the fact that the Novavax shot still injects you with the toxic, bioweapon spike protein by the billions, you just get it differently.  They take mRNA designed to force the development of toxic, foreign spikes in your body and they put it in a baculovirus (insect pathogenic virus) which infects moths but not humans per say. They then transport the mRNA to the moth, which then makes billions of spikes which the company then extracts and puts on a graphene sheet and then fills a vial with adjuvant.  All of the COVID jabs are dangerous.  There isn’t one that’s safe, and none of them are “vaccines.”
  • At 8:30 Dr. Ruby discusses nebulized hydrogen peroxide.
  • “Viruses burn down, not up.”  ~ Dr. Ruby  This simply means that viruses grow weaker over time, not stronger.
  • We are in a cold and flu season.  This is nothing new, but it will all be labeled COVID.
  • Despite the fact the CDC recalled the PCR test  they state it can continue to be used for the rest of the year. There is absolutely no way PCR can determine what variant is causing illness.

___________________

For a bit of humor that is spot on:

http://

CDC Walensky states, “These tests are not authorized for the purpose of evaluating contagiousness.”  Yet, these very tests have been used to keep people from working, going to school, and participating in society. 

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/rapid-antigen-tests-cannot-distinguish

Rapid Antigen Tests Cannot Distinguish SARS-CoV-2 and HKU-1 – and That’s Dangerous

FDA Documents Show They Are Not Specific. The Law of the Instrument Tells Us That’s a Big Problem.
 
   
   
 

There’s an old expression: “When you’re a hammer, everything looks like a nail”. Sometimes referred to a “Maslow’s hammer”, this expression captures the idea of the law of the instrument. The origin of the expression seems to be from the observations that if you give a boy a hammer, they start pounding away at everything. Wikipedia has a good page on the history of this expression.

Thank goodness that regulations require that the FDA EUA documents not only be submitted, but that they can be viewed and read by anyone with access to the internet or who write to the FDA for a copy.

Everyone testing with the BinaxNOW nasal swab test, for example should be aware that per the documents provided by Abbott to the US FDA, their test can be a false positive if the person is infected with the HKU1 virus. (See the IFU Document):

“The comparison between SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein, MERS-CoV and human coronavirus HKU1 revealed that cross-reactivity cannot be ruled out.”

This language (or similar) is found in other IFU Documents for other COVID-19 RAT tests as well.

That means the test lacks pathogen specificity, and FDA cannot tell us what the risk of a false COVID-19 indication is without follow-up PCR testing. Further, like the PCR test, the comparison was only computational, based on BLAST-determine homology, not based on studies of thousands of patients. Further, protein structure, not sequence, is important for cross-reactivity – BLAST is not refined enough a tool to determine actually binding capacity, yet the FDA allowed negative BLAST results as evidence of degree of specificity.

PCR testing is similarly fraught with its own false positive problems, in part due to the same error (allowing BLAST results instead of requiring actual data from large studies). This is an issue the CDC could be finally coming to terms with after IPAK published a peer-review study in our journal on the problem, after Dr. Sin Hang Lee published two studies, after dozens of videos and articles have been written by yours truly alerting the world of the problem of PCR false positives due to the use of high cycle thresholds, and after an uproar over the fact that the PCR tests do not rule in Influenza.

HKU1, aka HCoV-HK1, first detected in 2004 in Hong Kong, is a Betacoronavirus (because it has a Hemagglutinin esterase gene), and enters the cell via a different recept that SARS-CoV-2. Like SAR-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-2, it is an enveloped, single-stranded RNA virus.

Here’s an array of symptoms of HKU1 infection reported in 2017:

“Of 832 adult respiratory specimens screened, 13 (1.6%) cases of CoV-HKU1 were identified. Adults age ranged between 23 and 75 years and 6 (46%) were males. All of whom had 1 or more respiratory symptoms, and 5 (38%) also reported 1 or more gastrointestinal symptoms. Eleven (85%) reported history of smoking and 5 (38%) used inhaled steroids. Seven (54%) required hospitalization, 5 (71%) of these needed supplemental oxygen, and 2 (29%) were admitted to intensive care. Median length of hospitalization was 5 days. Eight (62%) received antibiotics despite identification of CoV-HKU1. Infectious work-up in 1 patient who died did not reveal any other pathogen. In 2 (15%) CoV-HKU1-positive adults, the only viral coinfection detected was influenza A.”

In 15% of people studied, co-infection with Influenza A was detected. That’s fairly common. For all of 2020-2021, for two years, “co-infection” of COVID-19 patients (PCR+ for SARS-CoV) was not even mentioned. Now that everyone (well, nearly everyone) is testing with in-home nasal swab kits for antibodies, many will be positive but will actually be HKU-1. Given the FDA’s allowance of specificity-by-BLAST, the problem could be much worse.

Why This is Dangerous

There are few good reasons why this is dangerous. Yes, the problem will make it appear as if more people have COVID-19 than actually do. The clinical workflow for COVID-19 is far more strenuous than for influenza A or HKU-1, so there’s the added burden on the healthcare system. I’ve heard reports that some hospitals are resorting to triage, placing non-PCR+ non-respiratory illness patients at risk (the in-hospital PCR screening adds to this as well).

However, people who have had a positive Rapid Antigen Test may also come to think of COVID-19 as mild for them, and their families – and worse – they may believe they have natural immunity and let their guard down. They may be more willing to attend a large gather, or mingle with others while symptomatic.

Third, false positives from PCR and from RAT tests alike will lead the public – and public health and medical communities – to believe that re-infection with SARS-CoV-2 is possible. The dynamics of societal responses will be flawed, leading to more quarantine, shut-downs, draconian control measures.

Fourth, the clinical care for a person who has respiratory viral infections other than SARS-CoV-2 may be different. If 15% of patients with “COVID-19” have something else, the CDC should know and medical practice should be altered to address this.

Fifth, co-housing non-COVID19 respiratory patients with COVID-19 patients can place them at risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Being sick already, they may have a more difficult clinical course as a result. Here’s a case of a woman who had HKU-1 infection on the day of entry and tested positive for COVID-19 on Day 3 of hospitalization.

Every single person who tests positive via PCR or RAT who has clinical symptoms or who has been exposed to a confirmed case of COVID-19 should have a confirmatory Sanger Sequencing test conducted to ensure what they have (or had) was truly a SARS-CoV-2 infection. As an added benefit, unlike PCR or RAT, Sanger Sequencing can tell us what variant we have (or have had).

There are over 6,000 laboratories around the US that can conduct Sanger Sequencing, and Sin Hang Lee, MD of Millford, CT is happy to provide the information on the primers he has developed for nested primer target amplification – and for Omicron detection.

Here’s a requisition form that can be used to order the Sanger Sequencing test (I have no financial relationship w/Dr. Lee or Millford Diagnostics).

The Law of the Instrument tells us that if you only test for COVID-19, you’ll only find COVID-19. Multiplex respiratory pathogen tests are also used in some places.

Please share with doctors and nurses in your area. This could help you & your loved ones travel a safer course.

__________________

For more:

Until We the People refuse to be tested by a test that doesn’t test for the very thing they claim it does, we can expect more lockdowns, more mandates, and more tyranny.  Time to stand up and refuse to be a part of this complete farce.

Category:

Testing, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Lyme Disease & Medical Fraud: Federal Lies, Medical Lies, and Statistics Kindle Book

By Alan Foos

https://www.amazon.com/Lyme-Disease-Medical-Fraud-Statistics-ebook/dp/B01M2679DA/ref=monarch_sidesheet  (Book written in 2016)

Millions are suffering with Lyme disease while being drained further by a predatory medical industry, criminal CDC and fraudulent pharmaceutical industry. You probably know some if you aren’t one. They’re being treated for bipolar disorder, fibromyalgia, MS, Alzheimer’s, MS, schizophrenia, personality disorder or many other bogus diseases. The money is in drugs that don’t work, especially psychoactives which in the long term will create the symptoms they are supposed to treat. If you were blind sided by Lyme, you likely lost your career, maybe your home and family. Here is how I fared for 47 years, what I learned that would have saved me all those nightmares. It would have also saved my wife who was also destroyed by Lyme disease and our three children born with it. I give you no illusions or false promises, only how I met God, fought the fight and won the game long before I found out about Lyme. Also, you may request a link to a FLIPPING BOOK online version of the book which is much easier to use. For an example of a technical flipping book I’ve written, see http://foosresearch.appspot.com

https://www.foosresearch.com/lymelikeme.html  (From 2020)

Foos writes about his long struggle Lyme disease.  This is not for the faint of heart – but no Lyme/MSIDS story ever is.  The desperation is tangibly felt, as is the cruel, abusive attitudes of clueless doctors who are much more willing to write you off as a nut-job than a person struggling with numerous pathogens – any one of which can kill you but together put you in a pit of despair so deep you wonder if you will ever be able to crawl out of it.

Foos was particularly challenged with a complete mental and physical breakdown and a near death experience. He had severe infections in his sinuses, facial tissues, legs and feet.  Struggling with involuntary facial contortions and facial agony, Foos, like so many, had to find answers for himself.  Being a biologist and soils engineer, he labored day and night slaving in the lab to learn the scientific properties of bentonite.

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Treatment