Submission received: 31 October 2023 / Revised: 30 November 2023 / Accepted: 6 December 2023 / Published: 29 December 2023
Abstract
A review of the association between microbes and mental illness is performed, including the history, relevant definitions, infectious agents associated with mental illnesses, complex interactive infections, total load theory, pathophysiology, psychoimmunology, psychoneuroimmunology, clinical presentations, early-life infections, clinical assessment, and treatment. Perspectives on the etiology of mental illness have evolved from demonic possession toward multisystem biologically based models that include gene expression, environmental triggers, immune mediators, and infectious diseases. Microbes are associated with a number of mental disorders, including autism, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depressive disorders, and anxiety disorders, as well as suicidality and aggressive or violent behaviors. Specific microbes that have been associated or potentially associated with at least one of these conditions include Aspergillus, Babesia, Bartonella, Borna disease virus, Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease), Candida, Chlamydia, coronaviruses (e.g., SARS-CoV-2), Cryptococcus neoformans, cytomegalovirus, enteroviruses, Epstein–Barr virus, hepatitis C, herpes simplex virus, human endogenous retroviruses, human immunodeficiency virus, human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6), human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1, influenza viruses, measles virus, Mycoplasma, Plasmodium, rubella virus, Group A Streptococcus (PANDAS), Taenia solium, Toxoplasma gondii, Treponema pallidum (syphilis), Trypanosoma, and West Nile virus.
Recognition of the microbe and mental illness association with the development of greater interdisciplinary research, education, and treatment options may prevent and reduce mental illness morbidity, disability, and mortality.
Borrelia Biofilms: Mechanisms, Pathogenesis, and Clinical Implications in Lyme Disease
Borrelia Biofilms: How They Cause Lyme Disease & Resist TreatmentThis article is part of the LymeCare Alliance Training Certification Program, designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills necessary to understand and address Lyme disease effectively. Complete this module as part of your journey towards becoming a certified expert in Lyme disease care.
Biofilm formation in Borrelia has emerged as a critical virulence factor contributing to its persistence in hosts and resistance to both immune responses and antimicrobial treatments. While biofilms have been well-studied in many bacterial species, recent advances in the study of Borrelia biofilms have shed light on this pathogen’s ability to survive in complex microbial communities and resist conventional therapies.
Understanding Biofilms: Structure, Function, and Implications
Biofilms are complex, highly structured microbial communities that play a crucial role in the survival and persistence of microorganisms in various environments. These communities are embedded in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), a self-produced network that acts as a scaffold for microbial cells. Biofilms offer a multitude of advantages to the organisms within them, notably enhancing their ability to resist environmental stresses, evade immune responses, and survive antimicrobial treatments. The formation and function of biofilms are therefore significant not only in natural ecosystems but also in medical, industrial, and environmental contexts. This paper explores the structure of biofilms, their role in microbial survival, and the implications of biofilm formation in chronic bacterial infections.
Biofilm Advantages: Resistance and Survival Mechanisms
Biofilms provide microorganisms with several adaptive advantages, particularly in hostile environments where free-floating, planktonic cells may not survive. These advantages include:
Enhanced Resistance to Environmental Stresses
Biofilms create a protective microenvironment for microbial cells, allowing them to withstand harsh conditions such as oxidative stress, desiccation, and nutrient depletion. The EPS matrix acts as a physical barrier that limits the penetration of harmful substances, while the close association of microbial cells facilitates cooperative behavior, such as the sharing of resources or metabolic byproducts, further enhancing resilience.
Antibiotic Resistance
One of the most notable characteristics of biofilms is their ability to confer resistance to antimicrobial agents. The EPS matrix not only impedes the diffusion of antibiotics, preventing them from reaching the embedded microbial cells in effective concentrations, but also slows microbial growth. Slow growth rates and a low metabolic state within the biofilm can reduce the efficacy of antibiotics that target actively dividing cells. Furthermore, biofilms promote stress responses in microbes, such as the activation of efflux pumps and the expression of resistance genes, which enhance their survival in the presence of antimicrobials.
Immune Evasion
Biofilm formation also allows microbes to evade host immune defenses. The biofilm structure shields microbial cells from immune surveillance, rendering immune cells like macrophages and neutrophils less effective. These immune cells may recognize the biofilm surface but are often unable to penetrate it fully or clear the infection due to the protective nature of the EPS matrix and the biofilm’s inherent resistance to phagocytosis and other immune mechanisms. (See link for article)
LymeCare Alliance Ltd is a private company with a distinct social mission. While structured as a private company, it embraces the principles of a Community Interest Company (CIC), dedicating its resources and profits to the public good. This unique structure allows LymeCare Alliance Ltd to operate with the flexibility of a private enterprise while ensuring that its activities and assets are primarily directed towards community benefit, in full compliance with the Companies Act 2006.
Company name: LymeCare Alliance Ltd. Company No: 15892184 Country: England
_________________
**Comment**
Excellent article and resource on everything Biofilm. Highly recommend.
For decades, we have been told a lie, a lie that has led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans and the weakening of the immune systems of tens of millions more. This lie is called fluoridation. A process we were led to believe was a safe and effective method of protecting teeth from decay is in fact a fraud. For decades it’s been shown that fluoridation is neither essential for good health nor protective of teeth. What it does is poison the body. Therefore we should all be asking how and why public health policy and the American media continue to perpetuate this scientific sham. Despite the growing consensus in the medical literature about fluoride’s dangers and decades of denial within the federal health establishment to take any notable action, this is not the case for another class of pervasive toxic substances commonly known as “forever chemicals.” (See link for article which delves into PFAS)
Lobbyists for Pediatricians and Dentists Dig in on Water Fluoridation
The CDC hasn’t issued a statement since last month’s ruling that fluoridation at current U.S. levels poses an “unreasonable risk” of reduced IQ in children. However, the agency, which historically supported fluoridation, changed its website to indicate it now wants to shift responsibility to towns, cities and voters.
The Association of American Pediatricians (AAP), the American Dental Association (ADA) and other pro-fluoridation groups rushed to confirm their staunch support for community water fluoridation after a California federal judge last month ruled that fluoridation at current U.S. levels poses an “unreasonable risk” of reduced IQ in children.
U.S. District Judge Edward Chen also ruled that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) needs to enact a regulation that will eliminate the risk.
The EPA’s only official response so far to last month’s ruling is that the agency is reviewing the decision. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which has long promoted water fluoridation, has not issued any statement.
The ADA said it “remains staunchly in support of community water fluoridation at optimal levels to help prevent tooth decay.” It said the court ruling, “provides no scientific basis for the ADA to change its endorsement of community water fluoridation as safe and beneficial to oral health.”
However, Chen’s 80-page ruling summarizes and evaluates the extensive scientific data. The data include a key report researched and compiled over six years by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ National Toxicology Program (NTP), along with gold-standard epidemiological studies from the U.S., Mexico, Canada and Europe by top hazardous substances researchers.
Although the ruling did not specify the exact level at which fluoridation causes brain damage, the levels in U.S. water present an unreasonable risk, Chen found.
The decision didn’t sway the AAP. “There is nothing about the current decision that changes my confidence in the safety of optimally fluoridated water in the U.S.,” said Dr. Charlotte W. Lewis, a member of the AAP Section on Oral Health. (See link for article)
Breaking: New Cochrane Review Finds Water Fluoridation Has Minimal Effect on Dental Health
Adding fluoride to drinking water provides very limited dental benefits, according to an updated Cochrane Review published today. The review follows a California federal court ruling that fluoridation poses an “unreasonable risk” of reduced IQ in children.
Adding fluoride to drinking water provides very limited dental benefits, especially compared with 50 years ago, according to an updated Cochrane Review published today.
The review follows less than two weeks after a California federal judge ruled water fluoridation poses an “unreasonable risk” of reduced IQ in children and must be regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
It also comes as some U.S. cities and towns have moved to pause or stop fluoridating their water in response to the verdict, signaling that fluoridating water, a long-term and largely unquestioned practice in the U.S., is facing heightened scrutiny.
To determine if water fluoridation leads to reduced rates of tooth decay, researchers from the University of Manchester and other U.K. universities reviewed 157 studies comparing communities that fluoridated their water to those that don’t.
They concluded that contemporary evidence shows community water fluoridation may lead to a very small reduction in cavities in children’s baby teeth over time. Fluoride in water reduced tooth decay only by about one-quarter of one tooth, they found, and even that conclusion was made with “low certainty.”
Important excerpts:
They said studies conducted in 1975 or before showed a larger benefit of water fluoridation on tooth decay, CNN reported — a reduction of about one less cavity in baby teeth. However, those findings no longer apply to populations today who have better baseline dental health and exposure to other sources of fluoride, like toothpaste, they said.
The findings also confirm recent observational studies, including the LOTUS Study, which found only a 2% reduction in cavities among people living in fluoridated areas in England.
Yet, over 200 million Americans are currently exposed to IQ lowering fluoridated water on a daily basis.
According to this, water fluoridation is up to local communities and nobody has to wait upon the EPA, which may take years to act upon the judge’s order. The U.S. is an “outlier,” as only 24 other countries fluoridate their water.
“The U.S. fluoridates as many people as the rest of the world put together,” ~ Rick North, Fluoride Action Network board member
All of this is reminiscent of experts still supporting the COVID shots despite the fact they don’t work and have maimed and killed people!
Please watch Pfizer whistleblower Karen Kingston explain that these highly toxic rare earth metals (lanthanides) found in the COVID shots are used in ‘the internet of things’ technology including smartphones, electric vehicles, fiber optics, lasers, and other devices to create ‘super permanent magnets that provide power to all our digital devices.’ They are also key components of quantum dots and gene-editing nanoparticle technologies that are foundational elements of optogenetics and the internet-of-bodies (IOB)
Lanthanide nanoparticles can wirelessly control gene expression and nerve cell functioning of the brain.
At Least 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements Found in COVID-19 Vaccines from AstraZeneca, CanSino, Moderna, Pfizer, Sinopharm and Sputnik V, with Precise ICP-MS
Authors
Lorena DiblasiBiotechnologist, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Argentina
Martín MonteverdePhysician, Colegio Médico de Santa Fe, Argentina
David NonisBiologist, California, USA
Marcela SangorrínBiologist, CONICET-UNCO, Neuquén, Argentina
The experimental vaccines supposedly invented to combat COVID-19 were coercively forced upon the global population beginning late in 2020. They have precipitated innumerable and varied disease conditions ranging from mild to lethal. This increase in health disorders and sudden deaths began to manifest concomitantly with the number of people inoculated and doses administered per person. By the end of 2023, 24 undeclared chemical elements had been detected by Scanning Electron Microscopy Coupled with Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), in the COVID-19 vaccines of the different brands, by various research groups from different countries around the world.
In this paper, we report laboratory results from high precision Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) that confirm and expand previous results by SEM-EDX. To this end, the contents of vials from different lots of the brands AstraZeneca/Oxford, CanSino Biologics, Pfizer/BioNTech, Sinopharm, Moderna and Sputnik V were analyzed. Among the undeclared chemical elements were detected 11 of the 15 cytotoxic lanthanides used in electronic devices and optogenetics. In addition, among the undeclared elements were all 11 of the heavy metals:
chromium was found in 100% of the samples
arsenic 82%
nickel 59%
cobalt and copper 47%
tin 35%
cadmium, lead and manganese in 18%
mercury in 6%
A total of 55 undeclared chemical elements were found and quantified with ICP-MS. Combining these findings with results from SEM-EDX, altogether 62 undeclared chemical elements have been found in the various products. In all brands, we found boron, calcium, titanium, aluminum, arsenic, nickel, chromium, copper, gallium, strontium, niobium, molybdenum, barium and hafnium. With ICP-MS, we found that the content of the samples is heterogeneous, the elemental composition varies in different aliquots extracted from the same vial.
This scientifically created man-made DNA has a patent for it. The ultimate control of the patent is the DOD. Researcher Kevin McKernan and colleagues found huge amounts of plasmid DNA in packaged form that guaranteed their successful delivery to cells. His work has now been replicated in other laboratories. Go here to learn how this is devastating to the human body in a myriad of ways.
Recently, a previously declassified CIA documenthas gone viral. The doc summarizes a Soviet scientific paper that showed researchers believed parasites and cancer thrived under nearly identical metabolic conditions and accumulated large reserves of glycogen, a form of stored energy.
Myracyl D, Miracel D, Lucanthone, was reportedly effective against bilharzia parasites as well as cancerous growths. It has never been approved for medicinal use as chemo and has been tested in human clinical trials and is used in research. It is no longer commonly used in humans due to hepatotoxicity.[4]
Other compounds were found to interfere with nucleic acid production, a process essential for the uncontrolled growth of cancer cells.
It’s important to note that the document did not directly state that cancer was caused by parasites, only that there are biochemical similarities; however, this further proves why drugs like ivermectin, Mebendazole and Fenbendazole are helping cancer patients.
Go here to listen to an interview with Dr. Lee Merritt on how historical experiments showed parasites could induce stomach cancer in animals eating a high sugar diet or were vaccinated. She also questions how diet, vaccination and parasite susceptibility might intersect.
Since the paper below was published, there’s only been more success using repurposed drugs. Also, a 2021 patent by Johns Hopkins University was unearthed for glioblastoma therapy using Mebendazole.
Go here for Dr. Makis’s posting of studies supporting the use of ivermectin for cancer, including the turbo cancers caused by the clot shot.
Go here for Mel Gibson’s testimony on the Joe Rogan show of how 3 friends with stage 4 cancer are now cancer-free after taking ivermectin, Fenben, and other things like methylene blue.
Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolectular Protocol
Ilyes Baghli1, William Makis2, Paul E. Marik3, Michael J. Gonzalez4,5,6, William B. Grant7, Ron Hunninghake8, Thomas E. Levy8, Homer Lim9, Richard Z. Cheng10, Igor Bondarenko11, Paul Bousquet12, Roberto Ortiz13, Mignonne Mary14, Dominic P. D’Agostino15, Pierrick Martinez16
Date of Publication: 19 September 2024
Abstract
The mitochondrial-stem cell connection (MSCC) theory suggests that cancer originates from chronic oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) insufficiency in stem cells. This OxPhos insufficiency leads to the formation of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and abnormal energy metabolism, ultimately resulting in malignancy. This concept integrates two well-established theories: the cancer stem cell theory and the metabolic theory. Drawing on insights from molecular biology, pharmacology, and clinical studies, this manuscript introduces a hybrid orthomolecular protocol targeting the MSCC. The protocol includes 7 therapeutic recommendations, consisting of orthomolecules, drugs, and additional therapies. The aim of this hybrid orthomolecular protocol is to achieve additive and synergistic effects to enhance OxPhos, inhibit the primary fuels of cancer cells (glucose and glutamine), target CSCs and metastasis. Thus, numerous experiments suggest that targeting MSCC could be a potential therapeutic approach for cancer treatment. (See link for study)
Three patients with various genitourinary malignancies, who demonstrated complete response after receiving FBZ therapy, as a single or supplementary chemotherapeutic agent. In two patient scenarios, they had experienced progression of metastatic disease despite multiple lines of therapy prior to initiation of FBZ. No side effects from FBZ were reported.
The trendline went up with the rollout of genetic COVID-19 injections.
And it’s not like the FDA didn’t know. The Moderna patent explains that when a foreign DNA sequence integrates with a host organism’s genome, it could lead to the activation of oncogenes, mutated genes that have the potential to cause cancer, or the inhibition of tumor suppression genes. Researchers in the U.S. and Canada recently found DNA fragments in COVID-19 mRNA shots.
Go here for a review of a study that shows repeated injections of mRNA COVID-19 injections are taking down immune surveillance for nascent malignant cells while at the same time inducing autoimmunity.
The COVID shots are highly contaminated with plasmids, SV40 sequences that have been linked to cancer, metals, PEG, nanotechnology, lipid nanoparticles, black particles, white floating matter, impurities from human fetal cell lines, hexagonal crystalline structures, parasites and eggs, and a hydra-like moving, self aware organisms.
But, according to the CDC, more than 240 billion dollars will be spent on cancer care in the United States on a yearly basis by 2030. Just think about that. That is close to a quarter of a trillion dollars going into the pockets of certain people and organizations.
https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2024/02/06/cancer-ms-repurposed-drugs/ Dr. Marik has taken the lead in using repurposed drugs which is why he has been heavily censored – especially about ivermectin, a cheap, safe, and effective COVID treatment, which just happens to also be working for cancer. Go here for more, particularly about the responsive cancer types; however, Ivermectin has shown some degree of anti-cancer effect in every cancer type it has been tested on.
Listen to Dr. Kathleen Ruddy, surgeon, researcher, and author on how ivermectin not only works for COVID but has 20 years of research showing its potential for cancer. She met a previously healthy patient who ran marathons with no family history of cancer, but who developed stage 4 prostate cancer after being forced to get two Pfizer shots to keep his government job. Under another doctor he did 9 months of radiation and chemotherapy only to be told, there’s nothing more to be done, go home and prepare to die. At this point Ruddy met him and suggested he try ivermectin as she knew it wouldn’t hurt him and might help. He drove to Tennessee where he paid cash for it as it was an over-the-counter drug there. A few months after taking it he had his PSA checked which went from in the hundreds to 1.3 which is considered normal. Nine months later he’s out dancing 3 nights a week for four hours. A scan showed 3 of the four bone masses are gone.