Archive for the ‘research’ Category

Medical Detective: How Will I Know If I have Lyme Disease?

https://www.lymedisease.org/medical-detective-how-will-i-know-if-i-have-lyme-disease/

MEDICAL DETECTIVE: How Will I Know If I Have Lyme Disease?

This article was originally posted on Dr. Richard Horowitz’s Medical Detective Substack. You can find more helpful content by subscribing to it here.

Lyme Disease. The Great Imitator. Unless you found a tick on your body, you might not even know you were infected! 

Fortunately, a Medical Detective like me can find clues that you’ve got Lyme even without a blood test. How? There are classic signs and symptoms that are specific to the infection, and help differentiate it from other chronic fatiguing, musculoskeletal, and/or neuropsychiatric illnesses.

I listened to these symptoms every day for decades from my 13,000 chronically ill patients, and then decided to create a personalized questionnaire to capture the full scope of their symptoms. Trying to remember them all, including the frequency and intensity,  would otherwise have been a daunting task, not to mention a time-intensive one for a busy physician!

The beauty of this questionnaire is that it ensures I am capturing the broad range of Lyme symptoms, not to mention asking other questions which help me suspect whether someone might also have a parasitic infection, Babesia, making their symptoms worse.

I developed this questionnaire for my first book (published in 2014) and have updated it since. I hope you find it helpful. You can use this questionnaire with confidence, giving you a solid pre-test probability of whether you suffer from chronic Lyme disease, or not.

The full study proving the accuracy of the questionnaire can be found in the International Journal of General Medicine published in 2017. Let’s get started.

The Medical Detective’s Lyme/MSIDS Questionnaire 

Before you start:

All of the points on the list in Section 1 are symptoms that can be seen with Lyme disease. However, they are not just specific to Lyme and can be found in many other diseases as well.

Sections 2 and 3 ask about signs and symptom complexes most associated with Lyme and MSIDS (Multiple Systemic Infectious Disease Syndrome—much more on that to come), which I have compiled after examining thousands of patients in my practice over the years.

Section 4 is based on 2 of the 4 questions in the Healthy Days Core Module used by the CDC to track population trends nationally and identify healthcare disparities. It will help you identify the frequency of your physical and mental health problems in the previous month.

Think about how you’ve been feeling over the previous month and how often you’ve been bothered by any of the following problems. Then answer the following questions as honestly as possible, with symptom frequency and/or severity. (When we validated the questionnaire, both ways of asking the questions were able to determine the likelihood of Lyme and associated diseases.)

SECTION 1. SYMPTOM FREQUENCY AND/OR SEVERITY

SCORE:

0 – Never/Not applicable

1 – Sometimes (or mild symptoms)

2 – Most of the time (or moderate symptoms)

3 – All the time (or severe symptoms)

  1. Unexplained fevers, sweats, chills, or flushing
  2. Unexplained weight change; loss or gain
  3. Fatigue, tiredness
  4. Unexplained hair loss
  5. Swollen glands
  6. Sore throat
  7. Testicular or pelvic pain
  8. Unexplained menstrual irregularity
  9. Unexplained breast milk production; breast pain
  10. Irritable bladder or bladder dysfunction
  11. Sexual dysfunction or loss of libido
  12. Upset stomach
  13. Change in bowel function (constipation or diarrhea)
  14. Chest pain or rib soreness
  15. Shortness of breath or cough
  16. Heart palpitations, pulse skips, heart block
  17. History of a heart murmur or valve prolapse
  18. Joint pain or swelling
  19. Stiffness of the neck or back
  20. Muscle pain or cramps
  21. Twitching of the face or other muscles
  22. Headaches
  23. Neck cracks or neck stiffness
  24. Tingling, numbness, burning, or stabbing sensations
  25. Facial paralysis (Bell’s palsy)
  26. Eyes/vision: double, blurry
  27. Ears/hearing: buzzing, ringing, ear pain
  28. Increased motion sickness, vertigo
  29. Lightheadedness, poor balance, difficulty walking
  30. Tremors
  31. Confusion, difficulty thinking
  32. Difficulty with concentration or reading
  33. Forgetfulness, poor short- term memory
  34. Disorientation: getting lost; going to wrong places
  35. Difficulty with speech or writing
  36. Mood swings, irritability, depression
  37. Disturbed sleep: too much, too little, early awakening
  38. Exaggerated symptoms or worse hangover from alcohol

Tally your answers and record your score. Score: _________________

SECTION 2. MOST COMMON LYME SYMPTOMS 

SCORE:

If you rated a 3 for all the following symptoms in section 1, give yourself 5 additional points:

  • Fatigue
  • Forgetfulness, poor short- term memory
  • Joint pain or swelling
  • Tingling, numbness, burning, or stabbing sensations
  • Disturbed sleep: too much, too little, early awakening

Score: __________________

SECTION 3. LYME INCIDENCE 

SCORE:

Circle the points for each of the following statements you agree with:

    1. You’ve had a tick bite with no rash or flulike symptoms. 3 points
    2. You’ve had a tick bite, an erythema migrans (bullseye), or an undefined rash, followed by flulike symptoms. 5 points
    3. You live in what is considered a Lyme-endemic area. 2 points
    4. You have a family member who has been diagnosed with Lyme and/or other tick-borne infections. 1 point
    5. You experience migratory muscle pain. 4 points
    6. You experience migratory joint pain. 4 points
    7. You experience tingling/burning/numbness that migrates and/or comes and goes.  4 points
    8. You’ve received a prior diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia. 3 points
    9. You’ve received a prior diagnosis of a specific autoimmune disorder (lupus, MS, or rheumatoid arthritis), or of a nonspecific autoimmune disorder. 3 points
    10. You’ve had a positive Lyme test, such as an immunofluorescent assay (IFA), ELISA, Western blot, PCR, lymphocyte transformation tests (LTT and/ or ELISPOT), and/or borrelia culture. 5 points

Score: __________________

SECTION 4. OVERALL HEALTH SCORE 

  1. Thinking about your overall physical health, for how many of the past 30 days was your physical health not good?

SCORE:

Give yourself the following points based on the total number of days:

0–5 days = 1 point

6–12 days = 2 points

13–20 days = 3 points

21–30 days = 4 points

Score: __________________

  1. Thinking about your overall mental health, for how many of the past 30 days was your mental health not good?

SCORE:

Give yourself the following points based on the total number of days:

0–5 days = 1 point

6–12 days = 2 points

13–20 days = 3 points

21–30 days = 4 points

Score: __________________

TOTAL SCORING

Record your total scores for each section and add them together for your final score:

*Under 25 You are not likely to have a tick-borne disorder.

*Between 25-44 It is possible you have a tick-borne disorder.

*Between 45-62 It is probable you have a tick-borne disorder.

*63 or more There is a high probability of a tick-borne disorder.

*Anyone scoring over 25 should see a healthcare provider for further evaluation. The higher your score, the more urgently you should get evaluated. I can tell you that verified Lyme patients at different stages of treatment scored an average of 59. An online survey of people who self-reported “suffering Lyme now” scored, on average, 89.

Six More Classic Lyme Disease Signs to Watch For

(I wrote about these symptoms in the previous post, but here’s a refresher.)

  1. You have more than one symptom.
  2. You have good days and bad days. A hallmark of Lyme disease is that the symptoms tend to come and go, without you doing anything differently to bring on the symptoms, which can be very confusing.
  3. The pain changes and moves around the body. Muscle and joint pain, as well as the tingling, numbness, stabbing, and burning sensations (otherwise known as neuropathy) not only tend to come and go, but they are often migratory.  For example, you have joint pain in your knees on Monday, pain in your shoulders on Thursday, and pain in your ankles on Saturday. The same symptoms can happen with Lyme neuropathy, where the bacteria that have affected your nerves cause the tingling, numbness, stabbing and burning sensations to migrate to different areas. Lyme disease is the only disorder known in medicine to cause migratory nerve pain, so if you suffer from this particular symptom, it is highly likely that you suffer from Lyme! Since many of our patients also have an overlapping co-infection with different Bartonella species, if you happen to suffer from particularly severe neuropathic symptoms, Bartonella should be suspected along with Lyme disease.
  4. If you’re a woman, your symptoms worsen right before, during, or after your menstrual cycle. Lyme disease symptoms are known to change with fluctuating levels of estrogen and progesterone.
  5. Your symptoms improve when you’re taking medication for other ailments. Patients taking antibiotics for an unrelated problem (such as upper respiratory or urinary tract infection) will often report that their symptoms are much better while taking the antibiotic, and worsen when the antibiotic is stopped. Conversely, some individuals feel much worse on antibiotics, where all of their symptoms are intensified. This is called a Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction, where the Lyme bacteria being killed off temporarily worsen the underlying symptoms.
  6. Blood tests have confirmed a Lyme diagnosis.

More on testing in the future articles. 

Information about Validation for This Questionnaire

The original version of the Lyme/MSIDS Questionnaire was developed by Dr Joseph Burrascano years prior, after he took histories from his chronic Lyme patients.

I then took the questionnaire and divided into 4 parts, asking questions about the frequency and severity of each symptom, while also capturing essential information on whether patients lived in Lyme endemic areas, had been bit by ticks, had EM rashes, asking whether their pain was migratory (a hallmark symptom of chronic Lyme disease), as well as reviewing the number of healthy mental and physical days they had in the past month.

The validation study for the Horowitz MSIDS Questionnaire (HMQ), proving that it is quite accurate, can be found below. It was done in 2017, and validated among 1,600 individuals in three medical practices, who were both healthy and sick, i.e., suffering from chronic Lyme disease.

Empirical Validation of the Horowitz Multiple Systemic Infectious Disease Syndrome Questionnaire for Suspected Lyme Disease. Maryalice Citera*, Ph.D., Phyllis R. Freeman2, Ph.D., Richard I. Horowitz2, M.D., International Journal of General Medicine 2017:10 249–273

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919803

https://www.dovepress.com/empirical-validation-of-the-horowitz-multiple-systemic-infectious-dise-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJGM

The results of a detailed statistical validation study by 2 Ph.D. psychologists at the State University of New Paltz showed that the Horowitz MSIDS Questionnaire (HMQ) showed convergent and divergent construct validity, as well as predictive validity. What does this mean? We can accurately classify the Lyme Status of an individual using the HMQ with an 87% accuracy. Compare that to standard two-tiered testing (STTT) using an ELISA and Western blot, which has an accuracy of about a coin flip i.e., 50%.

Download now

The questionnaire can be accessed and downloaded from my website here.

Then fill it out and give it to your healthcare provider if you scored over 25 on the questionnaire and suffer from a chronic fatiguing, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, neuropsychiatric illness. In the next few articles, I discuss the testing that is available to confirm a clinical diagnosis of chronic Lyme disease/PTLDS.

This is part one of a two-part series originally published on Substack by Dr. Richard Horowitz. 

Dr. Richard Horowitz has treated 13,000 Lyme and tick-borne disease patients over the last 40 years and is the best-selling author of  How Can I Get Better? and Why Can’t I Get Better? You can subscribe to read more of his work on Substack or join his Lyme-based newsletter for regular insights, tips, and advice.

For more:

Lyme Disease Triggers GBS

https://danielcameronmd.com/lyme-disease-guillian-barre-syndrome/

Lyme disease triggers Guillian-Barre Syndrome

lyme-disease-guillain-barre

In a letter to the editor entitled “Lyme Disease as an Extremely Rare Cause of Guillain‑Barré Syndrome in India,” Sudheer Varma Y and colleagues describe the case of a 50‑year‑old woman who suddenly developed difficulty swallowing, slurred speech, and weakness and numbness in both upper and lower limbs.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is an autoimmune disorder in which your immune system mistakenly attacks the peripheral nerves surrounding the brain and spinal cord. GBS symptoms typically include weakness and/or tingling sensations in the legs, which can spread to the arms and upper body.

This patient also reported having three episodes of loose stools, two episodes of vomiting, and one episode of fever with chills and rigors.

A neurological exam found bulbar palsy of the ninth and tenth cranial nerves, reduced tone in all four limbs, absent deep tendon reflexes in the lower limbs, and absent bilateral plantar reflexes.

“Nerve conduction study suggested a demyelinating sensory‑motor polyneuropathy affecting both the upper and lower limbs, leading to a diagnosis of Guillain‑Barré syndrome (GBS),” the authors state.

The patient then developed lower motor neuron type of bilateral facial nerve palsy, which prompted testing for Lyme disease. Test results were positive and the woman was diagnosed with Guillain‑Barré Syndrome secondary to Lyme disease.

The patient was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), gabapentin, and a 14‑day course of IV ceftriaxone.

References:
  1. Varma YS, Kumar V, Agarwal K, Biswas R, Adil M. Lyme Disease as an Extremely Rare Cause of Guillain-Barré Syndrome in India. Neurol India 2024;72:1102.

For more:

Why Chronic Lyme Patients Don’t Get Better

http://

Why Chronic Lyme Patients Don’t Get Better

Dr. Richard Horowitz

10/30/24

In this Made for Health episode, Dr. Richard Horowitz, a leading expert in Lyme disease, joins us to discuss the complexities of Lyme and its connection to chronic health issues. With over 35 years of experience treating Lyme patients, Dr. Horowitz sheds light on his innovative 16-point model, which uncovers overlapping factors that contribute to chronic illnesses. He also shares insights on recent advances in treatment, including Dapsone Combination Therapy, and explores the rising challenges posed by co-infections, mold toxicity, and the impact of long COVID on patient health.

Dr. Richard Horowitz is a board-certified internist and the medical director of the Hudson Valley Healing Arts Center, an integrative medical center which combines both classical and complementary approaches in the treatment of Lyme disease and other tick-borne disorders. He has treated over 13,000 Lyme and tick-borne disease patients in the last 35 years, with patients coming from all over the US, Canada, and Europe to his clinic. He is former Assistant Director of Medicine of Vassar Brothers Hospital in Poughkeepsie, N.Y., and is one of the founding members and past president elect of ILADS, the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society. He is also past president of the ILADEF, the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Educational Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to the education of health care professionals on tick-borne diseases. Dr Horowitz has trained hundreds of healthcare providers in diagnosing and caring for patients with treatment-resistant tick-borne disorders and was previously awarded the Humanitarian of the Year award by the Turn the Corner Foundation as well as awards from Project Lyme for his treatment of Lyme Disease. He has dedicated his life to helping those stricken with this devastating illness.

Validated Lyme Questionnaire: https://mailchi.mp/8e5ccb1a9297/lyme-…

Informational PDF on Validated Lyme Disease Questionnaire: https://richmondfunctionalmedicine.co…

Website: https://cangetbetter.com/

For more:

 

Peer-Reviewed & Published Study on COVID-19 Shot Link to Death Censored TWICE & FLCCC Joins AAPS Lawsuit Against Board-Certifying Orgs For Censorship

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/breaking-news-twice-censored-landmark?

BREAKING NEWS – Twice-Censored Landmark COVID-19 Vaccine Autopsy Study Fully Peer-Reviewed and Published

After enduring relentless censorship, our systematic review linking COVID-19 vaccines to death is now available for the entire world to read.

In case there is anyone left who for whatever reason still somehow believes that the COVID-19 Modified mRNA “vaccine” platform is anything but a slow kill bioweapon, then the following bombshell article should dispel all remaining notions of “Safe and Effective” and “Trust the Science” once and for all.


by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The largest COVID-19 vaccine autopsy study to-date, providing robust evidence that COVID-19 vaccines can cause death, has been officially republished following successful peer-review in the journal Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law: A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 VaccinationThis comes after unethical censorship on two occasions: first, removal from Preprints with the Lancet and later, withdrawal by Elsevier after publication in Forensic Science International.

Hulscher N, Alexander P E., Amerling R, Gessling H, Hodkinson R, Makis W et al. A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination. Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. 2024 Nov 17; v5.2019-2024

Here’s what we found:

Background: The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, Spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction, and carcinogenicity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.

Methods: We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for all published autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. All autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy studies that included COVID-19 vaccination as an antecedent exposure were included. Because the state of knowledge has advanced since the time of the original publications, three physicians independently reviewed each case and adjudicated whether or not COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death.

Results: We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one organ-restricted autopsy case (heart). The mean age of death was 70.4 years. The most implicated organ system among cases was the cardiovascular (49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination, of which the primary causes of death include:

  • sudden cardiac death (35%)
  • pulmonary embolism (12.5%)
  • myocardial infarction (12%)
  • VITT (7.9%), myocarditis (7.1%)
  • multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%)
  • cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%)

Conclusions: The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine mechanisms of injury and death, coupled with autopsy confirmation by physician adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.

Our study indicates that the COVID-19 injectable products must undergo an immediate Class I recall by the FDA to protect public safety. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration defines a Class I recallas“A situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.”

The censorship and retraction of studies that show COVID-19 mRNA injection harms is deeply concerning. First, this study was inappropriately removed from Preprints with the Lancet (SSRN). The paper was posted on the server on July 5th, 2023 and censored in less than 24 hours after receiving massive numbers of downloads and reads, “because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.” However, the study initially satisfied SSRN screening criteria, which raises grave suspicions of censorship.  (See link for article as well as proof of the vast censorship)

_______________

For more on vaccines:

For more on corruption:

https://flccc.substack.com/p/flccc-co-founders-join-aaps-lawsuit?

FLCCC Co-Founders Join AAPS Lawsuit Against ABIM and Board-Certifying Organizations for Censoring Physicians

“Without open scientific debate, we risk losing the opportunity to discover effective treatments and provide the best patient care.”

FLCCC ALLIANCE

FLCCC Co-Founders Join AAPS Lawsuit Against ABIM and Board-Certifying Organizations for Censoring Physicians

Washington, D.C. (November 12, 2024) – The FLCCC Alliance announced that its co-founders, Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik, are seeking by motion to join the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) Educational Foundation’s federal lawsuit against the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) and other board-certifying organizations as well as the Biden Administration. This lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Galveston, TX, seeks to hold accountable entities that have not only censored but retaliated against physicians, including Drs. Kory and Marik, for advocating evidence-based approaches to patient care that are contrary to public health agency directives. Drs. Kory and Marik asked the court to join the suit after ABIM’s unprecedented decision to revoke their board certifications for their public advocacy despite their expertise acquired through long and distinguished careers.

FLCCC Co-founders Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory

The lawsuit alleges that ABIM engaged in tortious interference with their efforts to engage in a national debate over repurposed drugs and concerns about mRNA vaccination. The suit alleges that ABIM infringed on their freedom of speech, contractual due process rights, and includes defamation claims on behalf of Drs. Kory and Marik.

“Consensus-Driven” Medicine Cited as Rationale for Decertification

Since May 2022, when the ABIM first issued a Notice of Potential Disciplinary Action, Drs. Kory and Marik have tirelessly defended their efforts on the part of FLCCC’s positions, providing substantial medical and scientific evidence to support their recommendations for early COVID-19 treatment and critiques of vaccine risks. Despite these eminent physicians’ submitting over 170 references in a comprehensive 60-page response in January 2023, the ABIM chose to dismiss these scientific contributions in favor of a narrow, “consensus-driven” narrative—a rationale used as grounds for the revocation of their board certifications.

The AAPS case against ABIM and its co-defendants was originally dismissed by the District Court but was reinstated against the board defendants by the Fifth Circuit in its opinion that expressed strong concern about the suppression of medical viewpoints.

In response to their recent decertifications, Dr. Marik underscored the pressing need to protect medical freedom and accountability in healthcare:

“True progress in medicine depends on the free exchange of ideas and the courage to challenge established norms. Without open scientific debate, we risk losing the opportunity to discover effective treatments and provide the best patient care.”

“This fight is about more than just our right to speak—it’s about protecting the future of healthcare and putting these organizations on notice. When doctors are silenced for questioning the prevailing narrative, we all lose,” said Dr. Kory.

“We must ensure that medical decisions are guided by expertise and evidence, not by fear of reprisal.”

A Stand for Free Medical Speech and Patient Care

The lawsuit contends that board-certifying organizations, including the ABIM, the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM), and the American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology (ABOG), have acted in concert together and with the federal government to suppress and retaliate against physicians with dissenting viewpoints, thus infringing upon First Amendment rights. President and Chief Medical Officer of FLCCC Dr. Joseph Varon highlighted the critical need for organizations like FLCCC to stand behind medical professionals facing such reprisals.

“The FLCCC Alliance firmly believes that the essence of medical science lies in the open dialogue, exchange of ideas, and rigorous debate of differing perspectives. However, the actions of the ABIM reflect a troubling trend towards censoring any opinions that challenge the status quo. This censorship stifles innovation, limits treatment options for patients, and ultimately harms the doctor-patient relationship.”

Seeking Justice and Accountability

This case represents a broader fight for the integrity of healthcare, protecting physicians’ right to practice honest medicine based on clinical experience and scientific evidence. The FLCCC Alliance remains steadfast in its mission to advocate for healthcare providers’ autonomy, ensuring that the voices of Drs. Kory and Marik, and other medical professionals, are not silenced. This lawsuit is a pivotal step toward safeguarding medical integrity and patient care freedom for practitioners and patients around the world.

About the FLCCC Alliance
The FLCCC Alliance, a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization, was formed in March 2020 by a group of highly published, world-renowned critical care physicians and scholars with the academic support of allied physicians worldwide. Known for its lifesaving protocols for preventing and treating COVID-19 in all stages of illness, including “long COVID” and post-vaccination syndrome, the FLCCC has expanded its work to include treatment guides for various other conditions, such as sepsis, metabolic disease, cancer, and depression. The organization is dedicated to Honest Medicine™ that prioritizes patients above profits and emphasizes long-term wellness and the empowerment of both physicians and their patients. For more information, visit flccc.net

About AAPS

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons – AAPS – is a non-partisan professional association of physicians in all types of practices and specialties across the country.

Since 1943, AAPS has been dedicated to the highest ethical standards of the Oath of Hippocrates and to preserving the sanctity of the patient-physician relationship and the practice of private medicine. www.aapsonline.org


Will You Support Honest Medicine?

Your support is vital to advancing our mission. As the ABIM situation continues to unfold, we need your support to defend doctors and uphold your right to healthcare free from harmful influences.

By contributing to the Honest Medicine Movement, you’re not just donating—you’re becoming a crucial part of our effort to transform healthcare. Your support helps us expand our network of experts, amplify our global advocacy, and drive impactful initiatives.

Together, we can enhance patient care, reform broken systems, and champion the cause of transparent, evidence-based medicine. Every contribution fuels our key initiatives and brings us closer to a future where honest, reliable healthcare is accessible to all.

For more:

________________

**Comment**

Government collusion with the media, UNICEF, WEFWHO, IFCN, FBGoogle, and more has been  continually proven.

Nobody seems to notice or care that Fauci’s daughter worked at Twitter as a software engineer during the pandemic.  But I’m sure we should just believe him when he states they never discussed content posted to social media.

One other little factoid: Fauci’s wife serves in a leadership role overseeing bioethics at the NIH.  I’m sure that’s all kosher too, as well as the fact the pandemic vastly increased their household net worth from $7.6 million to $12.6 million between the start of 2020 and the end of 2021.  She also co-authored a March 2022 report approving of social ostracization for the “vaccine”- hesitant and encouraging employers to pressure their workers, which didn’t work out so well for the mayor of Chicago who recently lost her re-election bid, and now has to reinstate fired workers with back pay and a 7% interest on top.

Seems censorship has been going on long before COVID.  Anyone questioning vaccines is Wakefielded, those who disagree with government dictates is fired, or thrown in jail without a search warrant, and anyone defying the narrative is ‘disappeared.’

Symptoms After Lyme: What’s Past is Prologue

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/33044899?

Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue (Adriana Marques, M.D.)

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
Nov 17, 2024

Please see the following email addressed to Dr. Adriana Marques, Chief of the NIAID Lyme Disease Studies Unit regarding her recent viewpoint published in the journal Science Translational Medicine. The Editorial Staff was Cc’d on this email.

Senior Editor Courtney Malo, Ph.D. responded to my inquiry and is posted below followed by my final comment.

Photo of Marques was found on the following NIH site:
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/adriana-marques-md

Inquiry to Adriana Marques:

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “amarques@niaid.nih.gov” <amarques@niaid.nih.gov>
Cc: “osmith@aaas.org” <osmith@aaas.org>, “mnorton@aaas.org” <mnorton@aaas.org>, “ccharneski@aaas.org” <ccharneski@aaas.org>, “cmalo@aaas.org” <cmalo@aaas.org>, “bberry@aaas.org” <bberry@aaas.org>, “dhallberg@aaas.org” <dhallberg@aaas.org>, “dneuhofer@aaas.org” <dneuhofer@aaas.org>, “mogle@aaas.org” <mogle@aaas.org>
Date: 11/14/2024 9:54 AM EST
Subject: Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE

13 Nov 2024

Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue
ADRIANA MARQUES
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.ado2103

There have been five randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials addressing the question of whether additional antibiotic treatment benefits patients with PTLDS or symptoms attributed to Lyme disease.”

“The results of these trials showed that prolonged antibiotic treatment had no lasting benefit while having potential serious risks.”

Adriana Marques, M.D.
Lyme Disease Studies Unit
NIH Main Campus, Bethesda, MD

Dr. Marques,

For the record there are many infections requiring long-term antibiotics so why Klempner stopped his NIH funded antibiotic treatment trials for Lyme after “12 weeks” and then claimed no benefit makes absolutely no sense whatsoever:

From the following peer-reviewed publication:

Benefit of intravenous antibiotic therapy in patients referred for treatment of neurologic Lyme disease
https://www.dovepress.com/benefit-of-intravenous-antibiotic-therapy-in-patients-referred-for-tre-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJGM

Infections requiring long-term antibiotics: [See chart in the publication above with 8 examples ranging from 6mo to 5yrs]

In 1991 the Lyme disease organism, Borrelia burgdorferi, was grown from the cerebrospinal fluid of Lyme patient Vicki Logan at the Centers for Disease Control in Fort Collins, Colorado despite prior treatment with intravenous antibiotics. The patient died when the insurer refused additional IV antibiotics. Here is a copy of Logan’s CDC positive culture report for your review.

(Vicki Logan’s Chronic Lyme Autopsy results Page #1234567)

There are 700 peer-reviewed publications referencing persistent infection and in a 2018 study all patients were culture positive even after multiple years on antibiotics so there was no relief from current antimicrobials. Some of these patients had taken as many as eleven different types of antibiotics.

Thirty-four years ago Dr. Allen Steere identified chronic Lyme disease which should have set off a red flag prompting an immediate search for better antimicrobials but then did a 180° as he became principal investigator (PI) of the Phase 3 clinical trial for the first Lyme disease vaccine. So all the eggs were put into the vaccine basket while a campaign was orchestrated to discredit the sick and disabled patient population along with the courageous clinicians attempting to help these patients. Apparently, a chronic relapsing seronegative disease did not fit the business model of patent royalties, vaccine development and pharmaceutical profits.

Here is Dr. Steere’s 1990 publication summary for your review:

The New England Journal of Medicine 

Published November 22, 1990

Chronic neurologic manifestations of Lyme disease
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199011223232102

The chart below summarizes Lyme research funded by the NIH and only 2.5% has been allocated for treatment: [Click on link to view the chart]

Question:

Is there a reason why these facts/references/lab reports are missing from your viewpoint published in Science Translational Medicine?

A response to this inquiry is requested.Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH USA

Cc: Orla M. Smith, Ph.D. Editor, Science Translational Medicine

Editorial Staff

Melissa Norton, M.D.

Catherine A. Charneski, Ph.D.

Courtney S. Malo, Ph.D.

Brandon Berry, Ph.D.

Dorothy L. Hallberg, Ph.D.

Daniela Neuhofer, Ph.D.

Molly Ogle, Ph.D.

Response from Senior Editor Courtney Malo, Ph.D.

———- Original Message ———-
From: Courtney Malo <cmalo@aaas.org>
To: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
Cc: “Marques, Adriana (NIH/NIAID) [E]” <amarques@niaid.nih.gov>, Orla Smith <osmith@aaas.org>
Date: 11/14/2024 11:26 AM EST
Subject: Re: Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue

Dear Dr. Tuttle,

Thank you for your email in response to the viewpoint “Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue” published in Science Translational Medicine.

We suggest that you submit your comments as an eLetter via our website. To do so, please go to the paper under discussion (https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.ado2103 and navigate to the “eLetters” option at the very bottom of the page. Our eLetters platform provides a dynamic and rapid way for readers to provide feedback on the papers we publish and to elicit discussion.

Sincerely,
Courtney Malo

Courtney Malo, Ph.D. (she/her/hers)

Senior Editor

Science Translational Medicine

cmalo@aaas.org |  https://www.science.org/journal/stm

My final reply:

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: Courtney Malo <cmalo@aaas.org>
Cc: “Marques, Adriana (NIH/NIAID) [E]” <amarques@niaid.nih.gov>, Orla Smith <osmith@aaas.org>, “mnorton@aaas.org” <mnorton@aaas.org>, “ccharneski@aaas.org” <ccharneski@aaas.org>, “bberry@aaas.org” <bberry@aaas.org>, “dhallberg@aaas.org” <dhallberg@aaas.org>, “dneuhofer@aaas.org” <dneuhofer@aaas.org>, “mogle@aaas.org” <mogle@aaas.org>
Date: 11/16/2024 8:15 AM EST
Subject: Re: Symptoms after Lyme disease: What’s past is prologue

On 11/14/2024 11:26 AM EST Courtney Malo <cmalo@aaas.org> wrote: “We suggest that you submit your comments as an eLetter via our website.”

Dear Dr. Malo,

Thank you for responding to my email. Is my submitted eLetter in the process of being screened?

I would like to call attention to the following 1992 Science article that was listed directly below Dr. Marques’ published viewpoint:

Furor at Lyme Disease Conference: Patient-support groups got a dozen rejected papers reinstated at a Lyme disease meeting, angering researchers who had turned the work down as unscientific
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1604309

Excerpt:

To some authors of the controversial abstracts the grudging acceptance is too little too late, from a close-minded research community. “If [a finding] is not part of a controlled study, they ignore it,” says Long Island internist Burascano.

Dr. Malo,

Isn’t that exactly what I am questioning 32 years later? I am asking Marques why the peer-reviewed references I provided are missing from her published viewpoint:

My question to Marques:

“Is there a reason why these facts/references/lab reports are missing from your viewpoint published in Science Translational Medicine?”

It would appear that the act to suppress evidence of chronic Lyme disease spans three decades. How many lives have been destroyed resulting from inadequate treatment?

It is not uncommon for these corresponding authors to ignore serious inquires. One example is from my 2020 BMJ Letter to the Editor below. It should be noted that the corresponding author refused to respond to my inquiry after multiple requests from Editor-in-Chief Dr. Fiona Godlee.

Letter to the Editor of the BMJ published June 2020 
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1041/rr-1

Dr. Malo…. Has your journal been used as a podium to broadcast the long-established dogma while omitting evidence of persistent infection after extensive antibiotic treatment?

Respectfully submitted,
Carl Tuttle

_______________
**Comment**
Must thanks to patient and advocate Carl Tuttle for his tireless efforts dealing with knot-heads.  Kudos to you for having the patience of a saint.