Archive for the ‘research’ Category

Where are the Autopsies Post “Vax”? 5 New Studies & Is CDC Hiding Cancer Data Linked to Shots?

Back in April we learned that Public Health Mafia Overlord, Dr. Anthony Fauci, told our government to tell everyone NOT to do autopsies on COVID patients. Pathologists got the message. But as time wore on, more and more pathologists and doctors are demanding them due to the increase in sudden deaths (SADS) and the high amount of reports to VAERS after the COVID mRNA injections.

https://rumble.com/v1oandb-ryan-cole-is-the-only-pathologist-in-the-us-willing-to-test-for-the-vaccine  Video Here (Approx. 11 min)

Dr. Ryan Cole – only pathologist in the US willing to test for the COVID mRNA Injection “fingerprints”

October 16, 2022 
 
If you know someone who died post-vaccine and want to find out whether the person died from the vaccine, you’ll want to send the autopsy tissue samples to Dr. Cole to be examined. He’s likely the only pathologist in the US willing to do this work.
 
Dr. Cole states that pathologists come up to him regularly thanking him but will not step out to do this important work for fear of reprisal.
 
_____________________
 
 

Horowitz: 5 shocking new studies and data points that nuke the COVID shots

Oct. 4, 2022

“In summary, we have highlighted the pitfalls of having considered until now COVID-19 mRNA vaccines as just conventional vaccines, and we have indicated the preclinical, clinical and post-marketing safety assessments that are most urgently needed. COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are actually pharmaceutical drugs, and consequently their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and possibly also their pharmacogenetics, must be properly characterized to provide a solid background of knowledge for their rational and targeted use, thus stopping ‘playing dice’ with these products due to the misbelief that the same vaccine at the same dose is good for everyone, and that adverse effects occur just by chance.

Those were the words of Italian researchers in a recent pharmacological analysis of the COVID shots published in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences nearly two years after these products were foisted upon 5.35 billion human beings – often multiple times – under the false pretense of the jabs acting like vaccines. Who will be held accountable?

Every day, news pours out about the lack of safety and ineffectiveness of the shots, but they fail to move the needle on policy. It is unclear what it will take to get these biological agents pulled from the market, but here are some of the most recent bombshells proving the shots are extremely unsafe and ineffective.  (See link for article)

____________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-cancer-deaths-covid-vaccines-cola/

Is CDC Hiding Data Showing Cancer Deaths Linked to COVID Vaccines?

Analysis of U.S. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report data suggests the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been filtering and redesignating cancer deaths as COVID-19 deaths since April 2021 to eliminate the cancer signal.

10/18/22

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
 

Story at a glance:

  • Analysis of U.S. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report data suggests the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been filtering and redesignating cancer deaths as COVID-19 deaths since April 2021 to eliminate the cancer signal.
  • The signal is being hidden by swapping the underlying cause of death with main cause of death.
  • Uncontrollable turbo-charged cancers the medical establishment had never seen before only started to occur after the rollout of the COVID-19 jabs.
  • Before it was manipulated to eliminate the safety signal, data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database, or DMED, showed cancer rates among military personnel and their families tripled after the rollout of the shots.
  • After the rollout of the COVID-19 jabs in 2021, cancer patients have gotten younger, with the largest increase occurring among 30- to 50-year-olds, tumor sizes are dramatically larger, multiple tumors in multiple organs are becoming more common, and recurrence and metastasis are increasing.

In a series of Twitter posts, The Ethical Skeptic — self-described as a former intelligence officer and strategist — has laid out a series of charts illustrating how cancer deaths are being mislabeled as COVID-19 deaths.

The suspicion is that this is an effort to hide the fact that the COVID-19 shots have resulted in soaring cancer rates.

The Ethical Skeptic also takes a deep dive into the data in “Houston, We Have a Problem, Part 1,” on TheEthicalSkeptic.com.

As noted in his article, seven out of the 11 International Classification of Diseases, or ICD, codes tracked by the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics — including cancer — saw sharp upticks starting in the first week of April 2021.

“This date of inception is no coincidence, in that it also happens to coincide with a key inflection point regarding a specific body-system intervention in most of the U.S. population,” The Ethical Skeptic notes.

In other words, April 2021 was when large swaths of the American population were getting their first COVID-19 jabs.

Cancer diagnoses on the rise

The following graph, highlighted on Dr. Jennifer Brown’s Substack, illustrates the cyclical wave pattern of cancer diagnoses, from January 2015 and October 1.

As noted in the top-right text box:

“We should be at or near a seasonal nadir. Instead, we are at an all-time CA [cancer] excess, and heading up. Keep in mind there is substantial lag to CA reporting, so this likely under-represents true excess.”

At no point during the past seven years have we seen this rate of new cancer diagnoses.

Are the COVID-19 shots to blame? 

Probably, unless we can identify another widespread environmental factor or exposure that was introduced to the population, en masse, in early 2021, that didn’t exist before.

cancer diagnosis on the rise
Credit: Dr. Jennifer Brown

CDC fudging death records to eliminate cancer signal

According to The Ethical Skeptic’s analysis of U.S. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report data, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been filtering and redesignating cancer deaths as COVID-19 deaths since Week 14 of 2021 to eliminate the cancer signal.

The following two charts, posted on Twitter on October 1 and 2, illustrate how cancer mortality is being artificially suppressed.

As explained by The Ethical Skeptic:

“The set dynamics are complex, but the principle is straightforward. When a death cert lists Cancer as the UCoD [underlying cause of death] and COVID as MCoD [main cause of death] — the UCoD & MCoD are being swapped, and COVID is being listed as the UCoD 100% (425/wk).

cancer mortality
Source: The Ethical Skeptic

“This results in 20% of all COVID deaths each week, also happening to be persons dying of Cancer — which is egregiously higher than it should be. This is clear over-attribution = equates to exactly the difference between the Cancer and All Other ICD-10 code lag curves.”

“The problem facing the CDC, is … What does one do when COVID Mortality is no longer substantial enough to conceal the excess Cancer Mortality?”

lag deviation versus normalized trend
Source: The Ethical Skeptic

So, to rephrase, what The Ethical Skeptic is saying is that 20% of the weekly so-called COVID-19 deaths are actually cancer deaths, which is rather astounding.

But swapping the underlying and main causes of death, listing COVID-19 as the main cause, hides (to some degree) the fact that cancer deaths are going through the roof.

According to his analysis, the COVID-19 shot is killing 7,300 Americans per week.

COVID-19, meanwhile, is killing 1,740 people.

So, what will the CDC blame when COVID-19 disappears and they can no longer swap the underlying and main cause of death designations?

Department of Defense data showed massive cancer rise

Uncontrollable turbo-charged cancers the medical establishment had never seen before only started to occur after the rollout of the COVID-19 jabs.

Data from the DMED exposed by attorney Tom Renz and Sen. Ron Johnson (above), showed cancer rates among military personnel and their families basically tripled after the rollout of the shots.

As you may recall, within days of the DMED data being revealed, the database was taken offline, allegedly to “identify and correct” a supposed data corruption problem, and when it came back, the data had been altered to hide these glaringly obvious safety signals.

‘Turbo-cancers’ emerged after COVID jab rollout

In the video above, Swedish pathologist, researcher, and senior physician at Lund’s University, Dr. Ute Kruger, describes the changes she has personally observed in the wake of the COVID-19 shots.

For example, she’s noticed:

  • Cancer patients are getting younger — The largest increase is among 30- to 50-year-olds.
  • Tumor sizes are dramatically larger — Historically, 3-centimeter tumors were commonly found at the time of cancer diagnosis. Now, the tumors they’re finding are regularly 4 to 12 centimeters, which suggests they’re growing at a much faster rate than normal.
  • Multiple tumors in multiple organs are becoming more common.
  • Recurrence and metastasis are increasing — Kruger points out that many of the cancer patients she’s seeing have been in remission for years, only to suddenly be beset with uncontrollable cancer growth and metastasis shortly after their COVID-19 jab.

These “turbo-cancers,” as Kruger calls them, cannot be explained by delayed cancer screenings due to lockdowns and other COVID-19 restrictions, as those days are long gone.

Patients, despite having access to medical screenings as in years past, are showing up with grossly exacerbated tumor growths, and she believes this is because the cancers are being “turbo-charged” by the mRNA jabs.

Dr. Ryan Cole has also discussed the explosion of cancer (see video below). He believes the shots are primarily accelerating already existing cancers, by way of immune dysregulation.

He noticed that cancers that could normally be controlled and kept in check, giving the patient several years of quality life, once they got the COVID-19 jab, the cancer would suddenly grow out of control and rapidly lead to death.

Data are so corrupted, will we ever get to the truth?

The sad reality is that most data sources have at this point been so corrupted, it’s unlikely we’ll ever be able to get the whole truth.

The CDC started manipulating the data in 2020 and hasn’t stopped. DMED, which has historically been one of the best and most pristine, has now been modified. Other data sources have suffered the same fate.

It’s beyond egregious, and data modelers like The Ethical Skeptic show just how bad the situation is.

The idea that the CDC is massaging statistics to hide clear danger signals is appalling and unethical in the extreme, yet that’s what we’re seeing.

The question is, why do they go to such lengths to protect such a lethal product?

Your guess is as good as mine.

Originally published by Mercola.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

___________________

For more:

**Comment**
 
I’ve posted prolifically on the urgent need to break the public health monopoly which is completely overriding medicine as we know it.  I also recently posted about the Federation of State Medical Boards which is a very influential, private, nonprofit that censors and punishes physicians, attacks alternative medicine, and contributed to the opioid crisis by only supporting pharma-friendly establishment views.  This monolith is behind the AMA, APhA, and ASHP going after doctors for spreading “misinformation,” which is anything that defies the Big-Pharma, government narrative.
 
The lack of pathology on those dying after COVID injections is reminiscent of the lack of pathology on those dying after a Lyme/MSIDS diagnosis. 
Without this important work, nothing will change.
The monopolization of medicine will end health freedom and Lyme/MSIDS patients will be dramatically affected if it isn’t stopped.

Neurological Pain, Psychological Symptoms, And Diagnostic Struggles Among Patients With Tick-Borne Diseases

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/10/7/1178/htm

Neurological Pain, Psychological Symptoms, and Diagnostic Struggles among Patients with Tick-Borne Diseases

1School of Economic, Political & Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA
2Laboratory for Human Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA
3Center for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Raphael B. Stricker
Healthcare 2022, 10(7), 1178; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071178
Received: 3 June 2022 / Revised: 20 June 2022 / Accepted: 21 June 2022 / Published: 23 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Preventive Medicine)
Abstract
Public health reports contain limited information regarding the psychological and neurological symptoms of tick-borne diseases (TBDs). Employing a mixed-method approach, this analysis triangulates three sources of symptomology and provides a comparison of official public health information, case reports, medical literature, and the self-reported symptoms of patients with Lyme disease and other TBDs.
Out of the fifteen neuropsychiatric symptoms reported in the medical literature for common TBDs, headaches and fatigue and/or malaise are the only two symptoms fully recognized by public health officials. Of TBDs, Lyme disease is the least recognized by public health officials for presenting with neuropsychiatric symptoms; only headaches and fatigue are recognized as overlapping symptoms of Lyme disease. Comparisons from a patient symptoms survey indicate that self-reports of TBDs and the associated symptoms align with medical and case reports. Anxiety, depression, panic attacks, hallucinations, delusions, and pain—ranging from headaches to neck stiffness and arthritis—are common among patients who report a TBD diagnosis. Given the multitude of non-specific patient symptoms, and the number and range of neuropsychiatric presentations that do not align with public health guidance, this study indicates the need for a revised approach to TBD diagnosis and for improved communication from official public health sources regarding the wide range of associated symptoms.
For more:

New Study: Pretty Much Everyone Is Getting Heart Damage From COVID Shots

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-that-pretty-much

New study shows that pretty much everyone is getting heart damage from the COVID vaccines

They just aren’t letting you know that. In Canada, the medical community is very smart about this: they don’t let doctors measure troponin levels before you are vaccinated so nobody is the wiser.

Executive summary

A new study shows that nearly everyone getting the mRNA COVID vaccines are experiencing some amount of heart damage.

Introduction

Watch this episode from Vinay Prasad before YouTube censors it.

You only need to look at 6:21 into the video:

A new study out of Switzerland shows that vaccinated people have uniformly higher troponin levels than their unvaccinated peers.

In the graph shown at 6:21, we see that the 777 people who got the booster in this study have uniformly higher troponin levels than their matched unvaccinated peers. That is not supposed to happen. If the vaccines are safe, the troponin levels should be nearly identical between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.

Here are Professor Prasad’s exact words:

It’s not just the tip of the distribution that has elevated high sensitivity troponin, it’s that the entire distribution is right shifted. Everybody’s having a little bit of elevation in high sensitivity troponin. That’s what this graph would have you infer.

You get a troponin elevation when there is damage to your heart:

Troponin is a type of protein found in the muscles of your heart. Troponin isn’t normally found in the blood. When heart muscles become damaged, troponin is sent into the bloodstream. As heart damage increases, greater amounts of troponin are released in the blood

What the study shows is that nearly everyone is getting a little heart damage when they get the COVID vaccine, some get a lot more damage than others.  (See link for article)

__________________

SUMMARY:

  • Actual damage is likely much higher as they are measuring on days 3 & 4 when the slope is going down.
  • The article mentions the Thailand study, summarized in the video, which showed 1 in 28 boys developed subclinical myocarditis.  It also showed that 1 in 43 teens got myocarditis. Nearly 30% had cardiac symptoms.
    • Anish Koka MD (Cardiology) really digs into the Thailand data and points out that it has long ago been established that the messenger RNA vaccines cause myocarditis.  This is the real punchline:
I can assure you, and the mostly ER doctor contingent on twitter that brays about “mild myocarditis”, that there are no cardiologists who want to see their child have a cardiac troponin that is 2x normal or 40x normal after administration of some therapeutic.

It is absolutely head-spinning to see that the public conversation now is geared to dismiss cardiac injury in young healthy children as “mild”. ~ Dr. Anish Koka

  • Dr. Linda Wastila also asks why are we accepting myocarditis as an acceptable side effect after the COVID shots.
  • Kirsch points out that it’s highly likely the study author, Professor Christian Mueller, a highly respected scientist, will face attacks on the study due to his findings.
  • Canada is simply not letting doctors measure troponin levels before the shots are given.  Ignorance after all, is bliss.  Levels can only be checked if someone is admitted to the hospital, so no comparisons can be made.
“Authorities”, once again, are turning a blind eye to science, data, and reality.

For more:

Boston University Lab Creates New Deadly COVID Strain

https://thehighwire.com/videos/boston-university-lab-creates-new-deadly-covid-strain/  Video Here (Approx. 9 Min)

BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAB CREATES NEW DEADLY COVID STRAIN

Oct. 24, 2022

Is Boston University the new Wuhan? Researchers there have skipped the required NIH framework for dangerous pathogens to create a chimeric SARS virus strain on American soil.

Boston University researchers are taking that stance that it’s not ‘gain of function’ due to the fact their merging of the original Wuhan COVID strain with Omicron only caused an 80% kill rate in rats vs. the 100% kill rate in the original strain – essentially a “reduction in function.”

However, there is no way they could have known the outcome and as Dell succinctly points out, they could have created a more deadly virus and then accidentally carried it out of the lab similarly to how many believe is what happened in Wuhan.

Dell is not alone.  Other experts have slammed the research:

“This is playing with fire – it could spark a lab-generated pandemic.” ~ Daily Mail

Of course mainstream media is coming to bat (no pun intended) for the dangerous research as they are bought-out by Big Pharma and Big government – all of which are paid by the same entities and have the same agenda.  While mainstream media admits the research involved creating a hybrid COVID-19 strain, it’s all well and good because of the purpose of the study and the supposed safety measures that were taken.

Sorry.  No dice.

For more:

Anaplasmosis & Stabbing Headache

https://danielcameronmd.com/anaplasmosis-leading-to-neurological-symptoms-of-trigeminal-neuralgia/

Anaplasmosis leading to neurological symptoms of trigeminal neuralgia

anaplasmosis-neurological-symptoms

Anaplasmosis, formerly called human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA) is a co-infection from a tick that typically causes acute disease. In their article, “Trigeminal Neuralgia As the Principal Manifestation of Anaplasmosis: A Case Report,” LeDonne and colleagues described human granulocytic anaplasmosis in an 80-year-old woman with neurological symptoms. [1]

According to the authors, the woman experienced a “sudden onset of severe, lancinating headache in the distribution of the fifth cranial nerve bilaterally.”¹ She had been treated for Lyme disease two months earlier following a tick bite and a rash on her torso. She had since been bitten by a non-engorged tick.

Her neurologic exam was felt to be consistent with a diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia. Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a type of chronic pain that affects your face. It causes extreme, sudden burning or shock-like pain. It usually affects one side of the face.²

The patient’s mother had a history of trigeminal neuralgia. The doctors did not see any evidence of Lyme disease.

“However, anaplasmosis and ehrlichiosis can both develop over a shorter timeframe and without a noticeable rash, making these infections a more likely explanation of the patient’s signs and symptoms,” wrote the authors.

They added, “To confirm the suspected diagnosis, a tick-borne disease panel was ordered and was positive for Anaplasma phagocytophilum DNA by PCR.”

“Although severe headache is a common presenting symptom in patients with anaplasmosis, prior studies have not linked anaplasmosis and trigeminal neuralgia,” the authors explained.

“Our case suggests that anaplasmosis was the cause of our patient’s new-onset trigeminal neuralgia.”

The woman was treated with a 3-week course of doxycycline for Anaplasmosis and was prescribed gabapentin 300 for her trigeminal neuralgia.

She had marked improvement in her headaches. Her leukopenia, thrombocytopenia and abnormal hepatic enzymes returned to normal.

In their article, the authors reviewed the literature on Anaplasmosis, pointing out that the symptoms of Anaplasmosis are non-specific and may include fever, myalgia, and headache but no rash. In addition, patients may present with leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated transaminases, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase.

“Rare cases of Anaplasmosis showcase post-infectious complications such as demyelinating polyneuropathy and brachial plexopathy,” wrote the authors. “However, this patient’s presentation of anaplasmosis with new onset trigeminal neuralgia appears to be unique and rare.”

The authors urge clinicians to consider Lyme disease, anaplasmosis, and Ehrlichia in “a patient presenting to the hospital with non-specific symptoms of fever, myalgia, and headache in tick endemic areas.”