Harvard trained pathologist, Dr. Cole, was among the first to note mysterious blood clots in deceased people who’d been ‘vaccinated’ with the COVID gene therapy.
American virologist Dr. Robert R. Redfield, who served as the director of the CDC during the ‘pandemic,’ has admitted that reports of ‘so-called Long Covid’ are actually a cover-up for global surges of “mRNA vaccine injury.”
The diagnosis of long COVID often relies on symptoms post-COVID-19, occasionally lacking biological evidence. This case study illustrates how investigating long COVID uncovered an underlying bartonellosis through clinical metagenomics. Following mild COVID-19, a 26-year-old woman experienced persistent symptoms during 5 months, including axillary adenopathy. Pathological examination, 16 S rRNA PCR, and clinical metagenomic analysis were done on an adenopathy biopsy. The latter revealed Bartonella henselae DNA and RNA. Treatment with clarithromycin improved symptoms. This case underscores the relevance of clinical metagenomics in diagnosing hidden infections. Post-COVID symptoms warrant thorough investigation, and bartonellosis should be considered in polyadenopathy cases, regardless of a recent history of cat or flea exposures.
_______________
**Comment**
Axillary adenopathy, or swollen lymph nodes under the armpit, are common with Bartonella – but also with other things as well. It’s the body’s response for a foreign invader.
For those that read information on this website know – ‘long COVID’ has been linked to the COVID gene therapy injection, as well as mask wearing, but mainstream media and research are not even considering them. Another little factoid is the fact is that another recent study admonishes against using the term Long COVID as the symptoms are no worse than those after the flu. In fact, PCR testing can’t distinguish between COVID and the flu. So, what in fact is causing lingering symptoms in some people and how severe are they actually?
Sadly, this abstract doesn’t inform us as to the ‘vaccination’ and mask status of the patient. A review of masks show contaminants that are carcinogenic and infectious as well the fact masks make people sick.
ALL research from here on out needs to identify the patient’s ‘vaccination’ status, how many injections they’ve received, as well as if they are mask wearers.
Hopefully, people are becoming aware that ‘vaccines’ serve as triggers to upset the immune system, which can allow hidden infections to suddenly give noticeable symptoms.
Another important point is the choice of clarithromycin for Bartonella treatment. While this is partly a good choice, any experienced Lyme literate doctor would know to pair this with rifampin. Antibiotic resistance can and does happen so treatment should do all to avoid this possibility, and using at least two antibiotics simultaneously is one such method, and unfortunately, even then, relapses often occur.
Blueprint for Government-Controlled Medicine Sidesteps RFK Jr.
By The ANH Team
Just as RFK Jr. gets his legs under his desk at HHS, a centralized public health agenda is gathering pace that threatens medical freedom, farmers’ rights, food security, and individual choice. Action Alert!
The CDC’s One Health Framework centralizes authority over public health decisions, potentially limiting independent research, open discussion, and medical freedom.
The rollout of One Health is part of the public health response to bird flu, mirroring the COVID-19 playbook.
The One Health approach sets the stage for greater government control, mandated health policies, and reduced medical autonomy.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Department of Interior (DOI) have jointly unveiled their National One Health Framework to Address Zoonotic Diseases and Advance Public Health Preparedness in the United States. Framed as a way to address zoonotic diseases and public health challenges—like the H5N1 bird flu—the One Health approach claims to integrate human, animal, plant, and environmental health concerns into a unified strategy. In our view, this framework lays the groundwork for sweeping governmental control over medical (and veterinary) decision-making and, in the case of the bird flu, direct intervention in the nation’s food supply.
One Health: Centralized Control Disguised as Public Health
The One Health approach has been around for several years but had not become official policy until January 2025. The policy effectively consolidates power in the hands of three federal agencies led by the CDC, USDA and DOI, dictating public health responses during crises. Instead of allowing independent research, open discussion, and medical freedom, this framework ensures that a “unified federal voice” dictates the narrative and available treatment options.
Crucially, the powers-that-be appear to be deploying One Health policies primarily through the USDA and not the CDC, which comes under the jurisdiction of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). This shift away from CDC control is likely linked to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s role as new head of HHS, and he has been vocally resistant to pharmaceutical-driven health policies. The rollout of One Health, which emerged during the COVID era under the Biden administration, is being justified by rising concerns over the bird flu situation.
COVID Redux: H5N1
H5N1 avian influenza, aka ‘bird flu’, renamed more recently (presumably because it sounds more dangerous?) as ‘highly pathogenic avian influenza’ (HPAI) is a highly transmissible viral infection that primarily affects wild birds but has spread among poultry and dairy cows in the US. There have been a handful (70) human cases so far in the US with 1 death, according to the CDC. (You can reference our earlier coverage of the bird flu hereto get more background.)
The unfolding public health response to H5N1 bird flu mirrors the tactics used during COVID-19, except this time the food supply is involved. Scientists working under the pretext of pandemic preparedness have long manipulated avian influenza viruses, increasing their ability to cross species and infect humans (sound familiar?). Pharmaceutical interventions like mRNA vaccinesare already in development using half a billion dollars of taxpayer money, ensuring that government-backed solutions are already in place if/when further outbreaks occur.
Federal agencies have used this situation to justify mass culling of poultry, purportedly to prevent further spread. Just as during COVID-19, PCR testing—known for its high false-positive rates—is being used to assess the number of infections. Inflated case numbers fuel media hysteria and the sense that there is a public health crisis. The result is artificial food shortages and price inflation.
You can see where this is going: to return to “normal,” we’re going to be told to accept mandatory vaccination of farm animals under the guise of disease prevention—no matter what the human health consequences may be of eating food that has been treated with mRNA vaccines. This crisis ultimately forces farmers and the public into compliance, making acceptance of One Health measures a prerequisite for food security.
Why This Matters
The One Health Framework is, in essence, an infrastructure for centralized medical and veterinary control. By ensuring a unified government voice, dictating public and animal health responses, and training agencies to enforce these directives, the plan undermines medical and health freedom as well as the right to informed choice. Under One Health-style frameworks, it’s not hard to imagine what the next round of lockdowns might look like, with public health authorities having learned from the mistakes of the first round during COVID.
A similar push for centralized control is evident in the World Health Organization’s (WHO) plans to exert greater influence over global health policies (see ANH International’s analysis). President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the WHO was driven by desire to resist global control, but only time will tell how the new Administration will respond to centralized, coordinated responses like One Health that develop within America’s borders. There is also the specter of how future presidents might act in relation to the WHO, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and other United Nations’ agencies. The One Health Framework is, oddly, entirely in alignment with the global doctrines of UN agencies, and they potentially lay the foundation for international directives that override national sovereignty in health or veterinary policy.
Farmer First and Health Freedom
Outbreaks of highly contagious diseases like bird flu have already led to large-scale culling of poultry in the US, with over 35 million birds in commercial flocks being killed so far. This has caused significant distress and financial hardship for poultry farmers. The policy is part of the ‘stamping-out’ policy for avian influenza that meets World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) standards in an effort to maintain international poultry exports. Accordingly, the USDA is using the policy to force farmers to cull their flocks when ‘HPAI’ is detected, regardless of whether or not animals are sick. Many farmers and farmers’ groups are questioning the ethical and animal welfare impacts of the ‘stamping-out’ policy.
But it’s not just farm animals that are at risk of these draconian policies. One Health envisions coordinated responses against human cases that follow the rubric that was so widely adopted—and rarely questioned—by government authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rather than consolidating authority into a top-down bureaucracy, we should encourage open scientific debate rather than enforcing a unified narrative, promote individual choice in medical treatments, ensure transparency and accountability in public health decisions, and prioritize local or regional responses and health strategies over broad federal mandates.
Public health should empower individuals, not enforce compliance. The CDC’s One Health Framework moves us toward an era where governments dictate medical choices, silencing those who dare to question official recommendations.
It’s time to reject centralized medical authoritarianism and advocate for a diverse, open, and decentralized health system that encourages the dissemination of truthful health information and respects the right of individuals to make informed choices about their own bodies and well-being.
Action Alert! Write to Congress and tell them to reject the One Health framework to protect individual medical autonomy. Please send your message immediately.
Go to top link to write Congress to oppose One Health Framework.
______________
**Comment**
Sadly, a lot of Lymeland has embraced One Health, and research is nearly all earmarked with this Trojan Horse euphemism. The similarly and disastrously named PTLDS comes to mind.
Reggie Littlejohn, founder and president of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers and co-chair of the Stop Vaccine Passports Task Force, described One Health as “a very holistic-sounding approach to healthcare” that emphasizes “the interface between human health, animal health, plant health and ecological health.”
“All of that sounds very inclusive and holistic,” said Littlejohn, but “my concern is that it gives the WHO, under the pandemic treaty, the ability to intervene in any aspect of life on earth. So, if they find a health risk that involves animals or plants or even the environment, not just humans, then they can go into operation concerning that.”
“The entire One Health Scheme is based upon the patent lie and obvious disinformation that COVID-19 somehow magically leaped from some animal in the Wuhan wet-market instead of being an offensive biological warfare weapon with gain-of-function properties that leaked out of the Wuhan BSL4 [biosecurity level 4 lab].”
In this explosive conversation, Gary Null takes a hard look at the deception within modern medicine, the history of scientific suppression, and the power structures shaping public health.
🔹 The Myth of Trusting Authorities – How institutions like the CDC, FDA, and AMA have misled the public for decades.
🔹 The Fluoride Controversy – Why fluoridation in public water was a political and industrial scheme rather than a health initiative.
🔹 The Pharmaceutical Industry’s Grip on Medicine – How Big Pharma profits from chronic disease while dismissing alternative treatments.
🔹 The Suppression of Natural Healing – The untold stories of whistleblower doctors and researchers whose work challenged the status quo.
🔹 How Propaganda Shapes Public Health Decisions – The tactics used to silence dissenting voices in medicine, from vaccines to nutrition.
🔹 The Forgotten History of Health Pioneers – How early natural health advocates were erased from mainstream medical narratives.
🎙️ Null doesn’t hold back in this eye-opening discussion about why the public has been conditioned to accept misinformation as truth—and what we can do about it.
📌 Watch now to uncover the real forces driving modern healthcare!
🔔 Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more content!
Numerous deaths have now occurred after the MMR vaccine, but the emphasis is always placed upon the virus.
Stanford scientists confirm a fatal case of vaccine-associated measles encephalitis in an immunocompromised child.
In this case, the vaccine measles virus hypermutated to a fatal strain that invaded the brain and killed the child.
If the child was unvaccinated, the AML would have been treated in the usual fashion, with a good chance at survival.Source
International news sources pounced when a 6-year old Texas child died. They blamed the fact she was unvaccinated, but the true cause of death was multiple co-existing respiratory illnesses.
Measles outbreaks occur every year across the U.S. despite 90.8% MMR vaccine uptake.
It’s easy for the media to push measles fear porn due to the fact the CDC obfuscates vaccine data by classifying 95% of measles cases as ‘unvaccinated or unknown’– two fundamentally different categories.
Truth be told, measles cases with unknown vaccination status may in fact be vaccinated.
The CDC purposely merges unknown cases with unvaccinated ones maximizing the association between measles cases and non-vaccination while obscuring uncertainty in the data. It purposely does not apply the same logic in reverse – merging ‘unknown cases with vaccinated cases maximizing the association between measles cases and vaccination, which very well could be true.
This allows them to smugly reinforce a predetermined narrative.
You won’t hear these little factoids from mainstream media.
A google search for ‘measles’ reveals the coordinated fear campaign propagated by pharma-sponsored mass media:
Is there a reason to cower in fear as the news suggests and rush to get MMR booster shots? No, especially not for healthy children. However, we must remember that children with multiple comorbidities can face serious outcomes, as with any disease. It’s important to approach these discussions with a level-headed assessment of individual risk rather than reacting to sensationalized headlines.
Measles outbreaks occur every year across the United States despite 90.8% MMR vaccine uptake:
Shedding of measles vaccine RNA is a recognized phenomenon, with detectable levels in nasopharyngeal samples for up to 29 days post-vaccination (Washam et al). This shedding results from the replication of the attenuated vaccine virus, which can be transmitted to close contacts. (See link for article, studies, and graphs)
_______________
Important point:
A study by Miller, published prior to the introduction of the measles vaccine—found for measles:
hospitalization rate of 11.5 per 1,000 cases
mortality rate of 0.2 per 1,000 cases
In comparison, seasonal influenza:
hospitalization rate of 10–20 per 1,000 cases
mortality rate of 0.5–2 per 1,000 cases
Dissolving Illusions by Bystrianyk and Humphries indicates that measles-related deaths in children are overwhelmingly linked to malnutrition and vitamin A deficiency.
Please also recognize the scam of media reports using a positive test rather thancause of death. Testing positive means little as we saw with COVID. People tested positive and didn’t have ANY symptoms whatsoever.
WHO’s global lab network faces collapse without new funding
Bloomberg L.P. with assistance from Gerry Smith
The World Health Organization (WHO) in Geneva has warned that its largest global laboratory network is on the brink of collapse unless new funding is secured to replace the support lost after US President Donald Trump’s order to withdraw from the United Nations (UN) agency. (See link for article)
This organization needs to disappear forever, along with it’s corrupt mother the U.N.
The article blathers on and on ad nauseam with ‘vaccine’ propaganda – purposely stoking the measles cases in Texas, but never bothering to mention the fact the vaccine actually causes measles.
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 