Author Archive

Who’s Responsible for the Suppression on Ivermectin?

**UPDATE March, 2022**

Just today, the spin doctors are at it again to vilify a cheap, effective treatment for COVID.

The research involved 1,348 adults in Brazil who tested positive for COVID-19 and were all at risk of developing a severe case.

  • Half of the patients were prescribed a course of ivermectin pills for three days
  • the other half received a placebo

The study looked at the following variables in patients who took ivermectin:

    • whether they were less likely to require hospitalization
    • whether they cleared the virus faster
    • whether their symptoms resolved sooner
    • whether they were in the hospital or on ventilators for less time
    • whether there was a difference in death rates between the cohorts

Findings, which are awaiting publication, showed ivermectin didn’t improve patient outcomes for any of these factors, but please see the following:

https://rumble.com/vwfia3-a-letter-to-andrew-hill-dr-tess-lawrie-oracle-films  Video Here (Approx. 19 Min)

Published March 4, 2022

Story at-a-glance

  • While ivermectin has been widely vilified as either useless, dangerous or both, studies have repeatedly demonstrated its usefulness against COVID-19
  • A study published in the March 2022 issue of the International Journal of Infectious Diseases again found that treatment with ivermectin reduced mortality in COVID-19 patients to a greater degree than remdesivir
  • Another recent study found ivermectin was the most effective drug treatment against the Omicron variant out of 10 drugs, including nirmatrelvir (Paxlovid), which was granted emergency use authorization against COVID in December 2021
  • Remdesivir costs between $2,340 and $3,120, and nirmatrelvir (Paxlovid), costs $529 per treatment, while the average treatment cost for ivermectin is $58
  • In 2021, Dr. Andrew Hill published a meta-analysis on ivermectin against COVID. While he’d expressed great enthusiasm about the data and had agreed to work to get ivermectin approved as soon as possible, the conclusion of his paper was that more large-scale studies were needed before regulators could take action. It appears one or more people pressured him to change the conclusion of his paper, and some believe at least one culprit may now have been identified

Has the ‘Shadow Author’ Been Identified?

Producer/director Phil Harper now claims he may have identified the “shadow author” who fiddled with Hill’s conclusion.28 The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) reports:29

“‘The Digger’ on Substack (aka producer/director Phil Harper) has revealed the name of the person who could have edited the paper’s conclusions — which led to the WHO’s non-recommendation of the use of ivermectin. That decision could have led to the unnecessary deaths of millions across the world …

Harper studied the PDF of the paper, wanting to learn the identity of its ‘ghost’ author. ‘The hope was that some artifact on the PDF would reveal something, maybe a font was different, maybe there was a hidden comment, maybe some tracked changes had been saved to the document,’ said Harper. ‘None of those lines of inquiry came to anything.’

Then it came to him. Was it in the PDF’s metadata? ‘Sometimes it’s the most obvious of things,’ Harper writes. ‘The ‘v1_stamped’ version of the paper did indeed have metadata.

It even had author information inside the metadata. Expecting to see Andrew Hill listed as the author, instead, I saw a name I recognized. Andrew Owen. Unless someone used his computer, Andrew Owen has his digital fingerprint on the Andrew Hill paper.

As it turns out, Andrew Owen is a Professor of Pharmacology & Therapeutics and co-Director of the Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT) at the University of Liverpool. He is also scientific advisor to the WHO’s COVID-19 Guideline Development Group. Just days before Dr. Hill’s paper was to be published, a $40M grant from Unitaid, the paper’s sponsor, was given to CELT — of which Owen is the project lead.

‘The $40 million contract was actually a commercial agreement between Unitaid, the University of Liverpool and Tandem Nano Ltd (a start-up company that commercializes ‘Solid Lipid Nanoparticle’ delivery mechanisms) — for which Andrew Owen is a top shareholder,’ says Harper.”

If it turns out that Unitaid had anything to do with the alteration of Hill’s conclusion about ivermectin, then it has completely violated its mission and mandate, which is to “[find] innovative solutions to prevent … and treat diseases more quickly, cheaply and effectively.”30

This is critical because, for COVID, ivermectin was one such solution. Front line doctors and researchers knew it in 2020; Hill knew it; and therefore Unitaid knew it. Did they subvert the truth and let people die? If so, for what? A commercial agreement for a novel lipid nanoparticle product? Perhaps.  Source

https://rumble.com/vwpi0x-ivermectin-more-evidence-dr.-john-campbell.html  Video Here (Approx. 20 Min)

Ivermectin, more evidence – Dr. John Campbell

Category:

Uncategorized

Case Study: Autopsy Results on Alzheimer’s Death Showed Chronic Brain Infection

https://web.archive.org/web/20210615055543id_/https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/borrelia-invasion-of-brain-pyramidal-neurons-and-biofilm-borrelia-plaques-in-neuroborreliosis-dementia-with-alzheimers-phenotype-1564.pdf

Borrelia Invasion of Brain Pyramidal Neurons and Biofilm Borrelia Plaques in  Neuroborreliosis Dementia with Alzheimer’s Phenotype 

Alan B. MacDonald* 

Received 29 Janaury 2021; Accepted: 25 February 2021

ABSTRACT 

Dementia in Lyme borreliosis complex has been reported, mainly in post-mortem studies without available  antemortem evidence of active borrelia infection. Blanc in 2014 studied living patients with Lyme neuroborreliosis dementia and several dementia phenotype illnesses including an Alzheimer’s Phenotype. Herein we report an additional case study of a longitudinal evolution of European neuroborreliosis over eight years from tick bite to mild cognitive disease, to advanced dementia to death with a brain Alzheimer’s disease phenotype and concurrent borrelia deposits in brain Alzheimer’s disease sites at autopsy. 

Intrathecal borrelia specific antibodies were detected by commercial diagnostic laboratories (antemortem).  Molecular autopsy tissue imaging was completed with borrelia specific DNA probes and an immunomicroscopic  detection histopathology method. 

Results: Autopsy showed intact spirochetes, fragmented spirochetes, deposits of borrelia-specific proteins inside  plaque lesions and inside of neurons, and borrelia DNA deposits in plaque and neuronal sites. Pure Alzheimer’s  disease (without Lewy bodies) was a routine neuropathological finding. 

CSF evidence for a brain compartment immune response is established here. Intrathecal antibodies to infection  presented as oligoclonal total CSF IgG bands (n=twelve increase to n=13 bands) and separate borrelia IgG  western blot band analysis in cerebrospinal fluids (seven diagnostic borrelia CSF antibody bands). Blood western  blot disclosed triple borrelia species infection; burgdorferi European type (eighteen bands), garinii (twelve bands)  and afzelii (eighteen bands). Total borrelia IgG antibodies in blood during life were two hundred-fold higher  than normal range. Western blot of cerebrospinal fluid prior to death disclosed 7 protein bands which were not  represented in simultaneous blood western blot studies, further validating the intrathecal fingerprint of a separate  brain compartment immune response to neuroborreliosis infection. 

Conclusion: Borrelia protein antigenic stimulation of intrathecal borrelia antibodies was caused by resident  deposits of spirochetal protein deposits in plaques, in diseased neurons, and in neuropil brain sites, and in intact brain spirochetes. Deposits of borrelia proteins inside neurons and brain phagocytes and in neuropil sites (invasosomes) confirm remnants of chronic brain infection. 

For more:

Category:

Alzheimer's, Lyme, research

FREE Virtual Lyme Disease Conference

Free Virtual Lyme Disease Conference

Hear from top Lyme disease doctors, researchers, organization executives, and more!

Featured speakers include Global Lyme Alliance’s Chairman, Paul Ross and GLA’s Chief Scientific Officer, Dr. Tim Sellati, who will present on Transformative Discoveries Resulting from GLA. See the full list of speakers here.

Event Details:

  • Sunday, March 27, 2022
  • 9 am – 9 pm EST
  • Free to register
  • Suggested donations will support Global Lyme Alliance

Click below to register for free today!

About the Event

Registration closes on Friday, 3.25.22

Band Aid Lyme, LLC
Band Aid Lyme is a Social Enterprise company serving non-profits by fundraising for Lyme Disease research and treatments by planning and hosting events. As a Social Enterprise, all net profits at this time will go directly to a chosen organization.  

The First Fundraising Event Beneficiary: Global Lyme Alliance (click for more info)

The Lyme Disease Conference will be on Sunday, March 27th, 2022 from 9 AM – 5 PM. 
The location will be held online ONLY, as a virtual conference. All are welcome to attend.

Schedule of Speakers

BONUS TIME and additional speakers have been added to the schedule!
It is going to be a Lyme Conference Marathon!!
**Please note that the air time will be Eastern Standard Time.**

9:00am – 9:06am:
Band Aid Lyme, LLC welcome
9:07am – 9:14am:
Global Lyme Alliance welcome from Paul Ross, Chairman of Global Lyme Alliance
9:15am – 9:40am:
Global Lyme Alliance presentation by Tim Sellati, Chief Scientific Officer of Global Lyme Alliance on “Transformative Discoveries Resulting from GLA”
9:41am – 10:42am: 
Karen Vanderhoof-Forschner, President of Lyme Disease Foundation, presenting on the “History of Lyme Disease”
10:43am – 11:36am:
Dr. Richard and Mrs. Lee Horowitz, Lyme Literate Medical Doctor and His Wife, presenting on Lyme Disease, generally
11:37am – 12:33pm: 
Dr. James Schaller, Advisory Board Member for Band Aid Lyme and Lyme Literate Medical Doctor, presenting on Bartonella
12:34pm – 1:03pm: 
Choukri Ben Mamoun, PhD, Professor of Medicine and Microbial Pathogenesis at Yale University School of Medicine, on Babesia Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Therapy
1:04pm – 1:51pm: 
David Zuckerman, former Vermont Lieutenant Governor and State Senator, advocating for Lyme Disease Sufferers & wife, Rachel Nevitt, Lyme Sufferer and devoted Lyme Disease Advocate; And they own and operate a large Vermont farm!
1:52pm – 2:27pm: 
Brandi Dean and Tommy Farnsworth, on the nonprofit, Ride Out Lyme, LLC; Kerry Ann Lang, on support groups and mental health for Lyme sufferers
2:28pm – 2:49pm: 
Michelle McKeon, President of Lyme and Cancer Services & Licensed Clinical Nutritionist at Balancing Pathways
2:50pm – 3:49pm: 
Dr. Kenneth Liegner, Lyme Literate Doctor, presenting on “A Call for Collaboration in the Field of Vector-Borne Diseases”
3:50pm – 4:23pm: 
Mr. Gregg Skall, Esq. and Mrs. Monte Skall, Founders of non-profit NatCapLyme, “On the Front Lines – A NatCapLyme Perspective”
4:24pm – 5:24pm: 
Adina Bercowicz, Founder & Executive Director & Yan Zelener, PhD, from LymeTV
5:25pm – 6:00pm
Lindsay Keys & Winslow Crane-Murdoch, Directors of The Quiet Epidemic documentary film about Lyme Disease
6:01pm – 6:22pm
Christine Lorentzen, Functional Medicine Health Coach Candidate (2/22) & Lyme Patient Advocate;
6:23pm – 6:48pm:
Dr. Roni DeLuz, on Lyme Disease treatments and detox protocols from Martha’s Vineyard, MA, at the Healed Therapy Clinic
6:49pm – 7:38pm:
Kelly Franks, PharmD, Advisory Board Member for Band Aid Lyme, Lyme Awareness Advocate and Lyme Sufferer; Jennifer Crystal, Lyme Awareness Advocate, Lyme Sufferer, and Blogger for Global Lyme Alliance; John Zito, Father of deceased Lyme Sufferer
7:39pm – 8:08pm:
Dr. Felix Scholz, PhD Immunology, of Infectolab Americas on Blood Testing for Lyme & Co-Infections
8:09pm – 8:47pm:
Brian Karr of We Inspect, “How to Find Out if Hidden Mold is Impacting Your Health”
8:48pm – 9:03pm:
Joan Randall, on Magnet Therapy for Lyme Disease and Co-Infections from Integrative Wellness in Woodstock, VT
9:03pm – 9:04pm:
Closing statements

Category:

Activism, Babesia, Bartonella, Lyme, Psychological Aspects, Testing

CDC Removes 24% of Child COVID Deaths & Thousands of Others, Yet WHO Moves Forward With Global “Vaccine” Passports – the Ultimate Endgame

http://  Approx. 20 Min

CDC Quietly Removes 24% Of Virus Deaths in Children From Data, Blames “Coding Logic Error”

March 21, 2022

https://www.theepochtimes.com/cdc-removes-24-percent-of-child-covid-19-deaths-thousands-of-others

CDC Removes 24 Percent of Child COVID-19 Deaths, Thousands of Others

By Zachary Stieber
March 18, 2022

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has removed tens of thousands of deaths linked to COVID-19, including nearly a quarter of deaths it had listed in those under 18 years old.

The health agency quietly made the change on its data tracker website on March 15.

“Data on deaths were adjusted after resolving a coding logic error. This resulted in decreased death counts across all demographic categories,” the CDC says on the site.

(See link for article)

____________________

**Comment**

It must be noted that this type of faux pas will ultimately be used as ammunition to push for an “overhaul of public health”, particularly the consolidation and monopolization of data.  An internal CDC memo asks agency employees “to drive the success of the Data Modernization Initiative’’ — a CDC plan to strengthen the health surveillance infrastructure it relies upon.  Key points of the initiative:

  • unify public health data systems at the state and federal levels
  • “help” states hire staff to work on data collection & analysis (using $3 BILLION CDC funds)
  • create a “Travelocity”-like system where a “cloud-based” framework would allow staff to quickly analyze data and understand what is happening in real-time

HHS Protect took over part of U.S. COVID data collection at the beginning of the ‘pandemic’ which has since been taken over by the CDC.

It is clearly evident that the CDC wants to monopolize data and medicine, just like it monopolizes testing, treatments, and “vaccines.”  Do we really want the CDC to have even MORE data, power, and authority when it has bungled nearly every single thing it has touched?

Sounds like a perfect prelude to enable global “vaccine” passports where personal medical information is stored, tracked, and used by the government.

Go here to watch a brief video on what this dystopian technology would look like, and here to read about the players involved, their need to consolidate and monopolize data at the expense of personal freedom, choice, and privacy, and how COVID has been fraudulently used to bring an unsuspecting public to this point in time for the elite’s ultimate end game.  Go here to learn how Google and Youtube are investing $12 million to censor dissenters who have questions, concerns, or disagree with the accepted narrative.

SUMMARY:

  • Erroneous statistics have been and continue to be cited by doctors and others when setting public health policy as well as pushing for COVID-19 shots including the belief all children should get the jab, despite the fact:
    • children rarely get COVID or transmit it
    • children have more than a 99.9% chance of surviving
    • Johns Hopkins researchers recently reported that when studying a group of about 48,000 children, they found zero COVID deaths among healthy kids
    • a new study from Germany shows extremely few deaths among healthy children overall and ZERO deaths in 5-11 year olds, suggesting most studies are designed to distort the risk to kids.  Go here to read and listen to Dr. Prasad on how many are citing research that is flawed
    • more children have died from the COVID jabs than from COVID and more cases of COVID are among the “vaxxed”
    • before the change, the CDC listed 1,755 children as dying from COVID-19 along with approximately 851,000 others
    • the update saw the CDC cut 416 deaths among children and over 71,000 elsewhere, arriving at a total of just under 780,000
    • the agency adjusted its death count in August 2021 “after the identification of a data discrepancy”
    • the third correction to data still doesn’t solve the problem
  • Others have been using the NCHS tally, compiled from death certificates, which is also erroneous due to the fact it includes those who died with COVID and those who died from COVID. This bizarre counting includes people who died from drowning, gun shots, and car wrecks as dying from COVID
  • Some consider the updates “great news” as a quarter of pediatric COVID deaths vanished
  • Some are calling on the CDC to issue a public apology or at least announce such updates & changes since policies are put in place due to their false data.  (Don’t hold your breath)
  • The CDC wiggles out of accountability by simply stating that their data is subject to change

Please note that the CDC has a history of “quietly” updating its website with significant changes, and often changes definitions, and testing perimeters.   Some examples:

____________________

https://off-guardian.org/2022/03/01/who-moving-foward-on-global-vaccine-passport-program/

WHO moving foward on GLOBAL vaccine passport program

Tech giants and US gov’t co-operate on “SMART Health Cards”, and their use is spreading across the US…& maybe the world.

Kit Knightly

Countries all over the world are totally scrubbing their Covid measures, mask mandates and social distancing rules.

The CDC has changed their guidance on vaccine doses, and said people don’t need to wear masks anymore. Boris has done the same, and (some) of the UK’s emergency powers are going to expire soon.

It seems like Covid is over, and the good guys won, right?

Well, not exactly.

The pandemic narrative may be fading away, but certainly not without a trace. Covid might be dying, but vaccine passports are still very much alive.

This week, while the eyes of the world are fixed on Ukraine and the next wave of propaganda, the World Health Organization is launching an initiative to create a “trust network” on vaccination and international travel.  (See link for article)

__________________

SUMMARY:

  • The “Vaccination” Credential Initiative’s (VCI) list of members is revealing:
    • Google
    • Amazon
    • insurance companies
    • hospitals
    • bio-security firms
    • nearly every major US university
  • VCI’s steering committee is also revealing:
    • Apple reps
    • Microsoft
    • Mayo Clinic
    • Mitre Corp (multi-million dollar government-funded research org)
  • Discussion of an international “Pandemic Treaty” is underway today in Geneva and will undoubtedly include provisions on international “vaccine” passports.
  • The “Smart Card” is a covert federal “vaccine” passport system that allows them to sidestep those who care about individual freedoms as well as state vs federal law. Technically they are only implemented by each state individually via agreements with VCI, which is also technically a private company. The government indirectly funds the smart card.
  • While the government claims this is all handled privately, the smart card is run by VCI, created by the MITRE corp. which is funded by the U.S. government, so gov. agencies can get their hands all over your private data as well as Amazon, Apple, Google, and Microsoft.
  • Corporate giants serve as fronts for government programs and in return get big cuts of the profits as well as bailouts if needed, and regulatory reforms that cripple their competitors.
  • Quasi-monopolies like Facebook and Twitter harvest data for the government and censor anyone they are told to. The government then turns around and targets their competitors. 
  • Microsoft, Google, and Apple, take government money to create the tech, run the program, and harvest and store data which they make available to the government.
  • This unholy alliance is what allows the government to claim that it isn’t a “federal” passport system or a “federal” “vaccine” database. They merely sub-contract tech giants to do the work for them.
  • They have eked out everything they can out of COVID and have moved onto passports – the ultimate end-game of the plandemic. 
  • If the war in Ukraine doesn’t deliver on the rest of their plans, they will simply resurrect COVID.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Update for Wisconsin AB 299 & AB 316: Action Needed

Wisconsinites, please act today and ask Governor Evers to sign both AB 299 & AB 316

AB 299 has passed both the State Assembly and the Senate. If enacted, it would prohibit governmental entities and persons/entities doing business in Wisconsin from requiring individuals to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination as a condition of receiving services, transacting business, accessing facilities, or participating in nonprivate functions. Essentially, this bill is a COVID-19 vaccine passport ban. 

AB 316 has also passed both legislative chambers. If enacted, it would prohibit governmental entities in Wisconsin from discriminating against individuals based on their COVID-19 vaccination status or whether they have proof of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.

ACTION NEEDED:

1) Contact Governor Evers’ Office and ask him to sign AB 299 and AB 316! Please see talking points below to use when contacting him.

Email: Click here to submit a comment to Governor Evers online.

Phone: Call his Madison office at 606-266-1212 and his Milwaukee office at 414-227-4344.

Mail: P.O. Box 7863 Madison, WI 53707

2) Please share this email with family and friends, or you can tell them to go to http://NVICAdvocacy.org and click on the alert for these bills.

3) Login to the NVIC Advocacy Portal OFTEN to check for updates.   http://NVICAdvocacy.org. We review bills and make updates daily. Bills can change many times over the legislative process and your timely visits, calls, and emails directed at the correct legislators are critical to this process.

TALKING POINTS (Please personalize to share how this bill affects you and your family):

AB 299:

  • AB 299 prohibits state and local governmental entities, as well as individuals or entities doing business in Wisconsin, from requiring individuals to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination as a condition of access, receiving services, or participating in business or functions.
  • This bill serves as an effective COVID-19 vaccine passport ban, and would allow Wisconsin citizens to move about freely in society, regardless of their COVID-19 vaccination status.
  • COVID-19 vaccine passport systems come with serious privacy concerns.
  • Allowing COVID-19 vaccine requirements as a condition of service or access causes segregation, and potentially cuts individuals off from resources and services they need – such  groceries or healthcare – simply because they have not received a vaccine that is the subject of such a requirement.
  • This discrimination can even be life threatening. Some individuals have been turned down from life-saving organ transplant surgeries because they were not vaccinated against COVID-19.
  • More and more states and cities are beginning to rollback their COVID-19 restrictions, including proof of vaccine policies. Even the mayor of Washington DC announced she would end the city’s COVID-19 vaccine requirement for businesses.
  • Multiple states have prohibited vaccine passports including Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma (for students), South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah (government ban only), and Wyoming. Wisconsin should too.

AB 316:

  • AB 316 would prohibit discrimination based on COVID-19 vaccination status by the state and other governmental entities in Wisconsin.
  • Any form of discrimination against individuals unvaccinated against COVID-19 is essentially a form of coercion to try and get them vaccinated by implementing barriers to navigate life.
  • It is unreasonable to penalize perfectly healthy individuals who simply have not received a particular vaccine.
  • This bill would prohibit government-sponsored COVID-19 vaccine discrimination, allowing residents of Wisconsin to freely participate with their state and local governments.
  • It would also ensure that the residents of Wisconsin are allowed to access needed state and local government facilities and services without fear of discrimination based on their COVID-19 vaccination status.
  • State and local governments are taxpayer-funded and exist to serve the public. Since there is no vaccine requirement for paying taxes, there should be no chance of a vaccine requirement for accessing or using government facilities and services, or as a prerequisite for any other type of interaction with the government.
  • Passing this bill would also clarify that there is no state requirement or expectation of private persons and entities in Wisconsin to mandate COVID-19 vaccines or to require proof of vaccination.
  • Even individuals who are vaccinated against COVID-19 can still spread and catch it. COVID-19 vaccine requirements or mandates reduce the focus from health to mere vaccine status.
  • Our American system of government was founded upon protecting the rights of individuals. This protection entails prohibiting the intrusion upon these rights from other individuals and entities, including the government itself.

Sincerely,

NVIC Advocacy Team

Category:

Activism, vaccines