Author Archive

Amalgam to be Banned In Europe

https://groups.electricembers.net/lists/arc/dams-america/2024-04/

Amalgam to be banned across Europe

April, 2023

This article by Ann-Marie Lidmark was translated from Swedish to English by Marta Sonnenblick, a DAMS coordinator in California

Our note: This ban of amalgam mercury fillings applies across the European Union (EU). On January 31, 2020 the United Kingdom officially exited the EU; recall that the UK includes Scotland and Northern Ireland. So, the amalgam ban throughout the EU, as described in the article below, does not include the UK.

Beginning January 1st, 2025, all use of amalgam dental fillings is prohibited in Europe.

Amalgam consists of 50 percent mercury and mercury vapor is released throughout the life of the amalgam filling. That leak can make sensitive people very ill. The environment also takes a beating.

The European amalgam ban has been worked on by the [Swedish] Dental Health Association for several decades. The ban is clearly a great victory for this organization and its sister organizations in the rest of Europe. And, not the least, it is a victory for everyone who has been poisoned by their amalgam fillings.

It is also interesting that Europe has phased out amalgam fillings for both health and environmental reasons. The Swedish ban [of 2009] unfortunately focused solely on the environment, which led to neither dentists nor the Social Security Administration taking the risks of mercury use in dentistry seriously.

Mercury

The authorities talk about 0.6 grams of mercury on average per filling, but that is not true. Most amalgam fillings contain significantly more. A normal amalgam filling can contain from one to three grams of mercury.

A little mercury vapor always leaks from the fillings when chewing, consuming hot drinks, salty food, etc. Of the vapor that you inhale, 80 percent is taken up by the small blood vessels of the lungs and is then transported with the blood to the various organs of the body. Mercury disturbs the body’s biochemistry to the highest degree.

Extensive health risk

Amalgam’s mercury content carries major risks for health, but also for the environment. For health reasons, the EU had already banned amalgam for sensitive groups in 2018. That partial ban covered children under 15, pregnant and breastfeeding women. Since then, work has been going on for a total ban. The Swedish government, its authorities and the [Swedish] Dental Health Association have been strongly pushing for it.

“The decision means big gains for health,” says Florian Schulze, head of the European Network for Environmental Medicine, which helped us and our sister organizations in Europe push the issue towards parliamentarians in the EU.

Charlie Brown and Florian Schulze have been driving the effort to bring about an amalgam ban in Europe together with an El parliamentarian.

However, there are a few exceptions to the total amalgam ban and that includes both the Czech Republic and Slovenia; both of those countries will have another year and a half to complete the decommissioning of amalgams. That provision was a compromise that was forced in order to get the decision through.

The export of mercury amalgams from Europe is also banned

All countries in Europe are covered by the amalgam export ban, which also applies from January 1, 2025. The issue of an export ban has been urgent to pursue as mercury from amalgam can be used in small-scale gold mining, which creates very serious health problems for the workers. Other less toxic alternatives exist.

Article by Ann-Marie Lidmark, who is the former chairman of the [Swedish non-profit] Tandhalsoforbundet (which means Dental Health Association)

For more:

Category:

Activism, Dentistry, Uncategorized

Lyme Disease and the Fight for Recognition – A Documentary

http://  Approx. 43 Min

Lyme Disease and the Fight for Recognition

DW Documentary

April 7, 2023

Years of pain, paralysis and fear – without a diagnosis. For a long time, medicine seemed to ignore Lyme disease. The film accompanies several patients as they fight for an accurate diagnosis — and the right treatment. Many Lyme disease patients suffer for a long time before receiving a diagnosis. Their symptoms, including pain and paralysis, often seem to indicate other diseases, like MS. The fact that they have been bitten by a tick that carried Lyme disease often only emerges after many examinations.

This is exactly what happened to two of the film’s subjects: a girl from Brooklyn, NY and a researcher at Duke University. Both decided to take matters into their own hands and began carrying out independent research into their symptoms. Both ended up in the middle of a controversial medical debate and found themselves having to fight hard for adequate treatment.

For more:

TV Specials on Lyme

There’s been some excellent coverage of tick-borne illness, yet nothing changes.

Category:

Activism, Lyme

Bacterial Biofilm & Its Role in the Pathogenesis of Disease

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7167820/

 2020 Feb; 9(2): 59.
Published online 2020 Feb 3. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9020059
PMCID: PMC7167820
PMID: 32028684

Bacterial Biofilm and its Role in the Pathogenesis of Disease

Lene K. Vestby,1 Torstein Grønseth,2 Roger Simm,3 and Live L. Nesse4,*
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Abstract

Recognition of the fact that bacterial biofilm may play a role in the pathogenesis of disease has led to an increased focus on identifying diseases that may be biofilm-related. Biofilm infections are typically chronic in nature, as biofilm-residing bacteria can be resilient to both the immune system, antibiotics, and other treatments. This is a comprehensive review describing biofilm diseases in the auditory, the cardiovascular, the digestive, the integumentary, the reproductive, the respiratory, and the urinary system. In most cases reviewed, the biofilms were identified through various imaging technics, in addition to other study approaches. The current knowledge on how biofilm may contribute to the pathogenesis of disease indicates a number of different mechanisms. This spans from biofilm being a mere reservoir of pathogenic bacteria, to playing a more active role, e.g., by contributing to inflammation. Observations also indicate that biofilm does not exclusively occur extracellularly, but may also be formed inside living cells. Furthermore, the presence of biofilm may contribute to development of cancer. In conclusion, this review shows that biofilm is part of many, probably most chronic infections. This is important knowledge for development of effective treatment strategies for such infections.

For more:

Category:

Biofilm, Inflammation, Lyme, research, Uncategorized

German RKI Files: More ‘Pandemic’ Fraud

http://  Approx. 9 Min

What Do the RKI-Files Really Show?

4/2/24

German Professor Stefan Homburg explains that secret documents were obtained by Multipolar magazine and @paul_schreyer via a FOI request and a subsequent two-year lawsuit.

Documents here

Over 2,000 pages show that the ‘pandemic’ was all fraud. Highlights:

  1. ‘High health risk’ was not derived from data, but a political decision.
  2. The upgrading of the risk from ‘moderate’ to ‘high’ was the legal basis for all COVID measures and all courts that rejected lawsuits brought by those affected invoked it.
  3. ‘Herd immunity’ was seen as a mere narrative.
  4. RKI questioned the effectiveness of FFP2 masks stating there is no evidence for their use outside of occupational health and safety but RKI vigorously advocated mask and vaccine mandates and discrimination of the unvaccinated.
  5. The German government bought hundreds of millions of masks at high cost and politicians received thousands of dollars helping bring the deals about.
  6. The reports show it was known that the flu kills more people and that those who died of COVID already exceeded most life expectancies.
  7. Negative consequences of lockdowns were known but ignored. The government still issued lockdowns and school closures.
  8. The ‘pandemic’ was never about science.

RKI-Files are internal protocols of Germany’s Federal Health Agency. They were obtained through legal action under the Freedom of Information Act. The files show that politicians ordered the experts to make up stories and narratives so as to support the government’s preconceived measures.

RKI-Files (original source): https://my.hidrive.com/share/2-hpbu3….

_______________

https://www.krone.at/3309901

Germans publish corona file, but censored

Nachrichten

25.03.2024

The protocols of the Robert Koch Institute, the so-called RKI files, are currently the subject of controversial discussion online. The German institution had a coronavirus crisis team that discussed the measures in the country and shared its assessments with the German government. The minutes from January 2020 to April 2021 are now publicly available …

Journalist Paul Schreyer had filed a lawsuit for the documents, which are more than 200 pages long in total, citing the Freedom of Information Act. They can now be accessed on the blog “Multipolar”.

The Robert Koch Institute, which drew up the protocols, is based in Berlin and deals with the detection, prevention and fight against infectious diseases. In the context of coronavirus, the team’s expert assessment was crucial for measures such as the lockdown. Another example is the shortening of the recovery status after a Covid-19 infection from six to three months (beginning of 2022).  (See link for article)

______________

Comment:

  • an estimated thousand passages, such as certain names, were conveniently blacked out by the RKI.
  • “Multipolar” has filed another lawsuit, and the next hearing is scheduled for May.

I highly recommend watching Dr. Scott Atlas:  Why We Were Forced to Jab & Mask

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Congress’ Lip Service Against ‘Pandemic’ Treaty & WHO Focused on Profitable Disease X

http://

4/2/23

Senate Resolution 81 and ‘No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act’ Rots in Committee

Congress is simply doing lip-service in protecting the public from global tyrants while the Biden Administration is all in to have our rights taken away.

Without intervention, we hand over our rights to the WHO to do the following:

  • Define the next pandemic
  • Determine lockdowns
  • Surveillance power
  • Determine treatments
  • Vaccine Mandates
  • Vaccine distribution
  • Vaccine IP and profits
  • Redistribution of …..everything – all resources.

The Louisiana Senate has passed legislation (SB 133) to make the state independent from directives and mandates that originate from international institutions including the WHO, UN, and WEF.  It states that the WHO, UN, and WEF shall have no jurisdiction or power within the state of Louisiana.  No rule, regulation, fee, tax, policy, or mandate of any kind of the WHO, UN, and the WEF shall be enforced or implemented by the state of Louisiana or any agency, department, board, commission, political subdivision, governmental entity of the state, parish, municipality, or any other political entity.  It now needs to be passed by the House of Representatives and signed into law by the governor.

The anti-commandeering doctrine, under the U.S. Constitution’s Tenth Amendment, holds that the federal government cannot commandeer state and local resources for its own purposes, it follows that international bodies would not be able to either.

“We have watched a horror story unfold in front of us as time has shown that the ‘recommendations’ and coercive regulations from outside organizations such as the WHO have harmed hundreds of thousands of Americans who took a vaccine that they were told was safe and effective. Now, we are witnessing severe, long-term side effects and countless deaths because the ‘experts’ were wrong.” ~ Louisiana State Senator Valarie Hodges

The video also reviews history of how internal documents show the corrupt WHO paid sexual abuse victims in the Congo $250 each to cover up their crimes.

https://brownstone.org/articles/pandemics-a-business-opportunity/

Pandemics: A Business Opportunity

BY    APRIL 2, 2024 
 

Relax for a few minutes, sit back, and pretend morals and business ethics are redundant. Then imagine an infallible, risk-free business scheme in which you get to create the market, decide the product, manage its regulation, then have the power to confine people to their homes or remove their income until they submit to buying it. And no one can sue you or take you to court if it all goes wrong.

No legitimate government would allow that within its borders (except perhaps a few family-run or completely totalitarian ones), so aim higher and make this international, as it then ceases to be fantasy. All this is being negotiated within the WHO pandemic documents to be agreed by your government in two months’ time.

So, imagine:

  • Your organization will be a public-private partnership, so using taxpayer money but guided by the private sector.
  • You spin a story that a series of plagues are about to engulf humanity, exponentially increasing in frequency and severity (your partners own the media, so don’t be troubled by reality).
  • Then use public money to set up a surveillance network guaranteed to find virus variants (i.e. go and find nature, you can’t miss it).
  • Governments have agreed ahead of time to give you power to control healthcare policy when you decide these variants pose a threat (not harm, just a threat). They have agreed that this includes border closures, restrictions on daily life of their citizens, and of course mandated vaccination (in return for them ‘getting freedom back’).
  • Then transfer these virus variants to laboratories and pharmaceutical companies of your choice (your friends and supporters, who will in return give your organization some money).
  • The pharmaceutical companies are ready: They have been receiving free billions from taxpayers annually under the same scheme, to keep their production lines ready to profit from the market you are about to create.
  • Your Pharma-investor sponsors also sponsor disease modelers willing to produce the most fantastic death figures to shore up public compliance. They do this.
  • You then use your powers to impose these lockdowns and insist that a 100-day vaccine must be rushed out to save hapless humanity and allow a return to an “inter-pandemic” period.
  • Once your chosen companies rush out the vaccine, you get to control the regulatory bit (more money changes hands), bypassing pesky safety trials and those interminable ethics reviews.
  • All the while, you can note any dissenting opinions that may reduce your market size; your governmental partners having already agreed to deal with them.
  • Once you have the profit flowing, you get to decide when the profiteering can stop (think “respiratory virus vaccine” and more sponsored modeling – rapid waning of efficacy so lots of boosters to keep humanity safe).
  • All the while, you have ensured freedom from liability for your pharma partners and your own regulatory process.
  • You, of course, have no liability either – you are above any national jurisdiction. You don’t even have to pay tax to anyone!

(See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

I highly recommend reading, “For Some, There is Not Enough Infectious Disease in the World – So They Want to Pay You to Be Infected.”

Within this article you will learn of the egregious violations of human rights that have occurred historically in medical research.  Many state Lyme disease falls into this category as well.

COVID is a perfect example of how these experiments have shaped current ethic standards – or lack there of.  

“They serve as a grim reminder of what can occur when ethical considerations are sidelined for the sake of scientific inquiry or under the guise of political and racial ideologies…..these best practices appear to have all but been forgotten by Vaccine Manufacturers and Public Health.” ~ James Lyons Weiler

In short, a recent Guardian article spotlights Australia’s the Doherty Clinical Trials (DCT), a new facility dedicated to human challenge trials designed to expedite the understanding of diseases and the development of vaccines and treatments by intentionally exposing consenting participants to infectious agents or pathogens in a controlled environment.

The trials, which focus on a variety of diseases, from influenza to malaria and gonorrhea, involve compensating volunteers, typically young adults and travelers, for their participation – demonstrating enticement to consent and potential long-term health impacts.

The article points out glaring problems:

  • lab leaks
  • generation of more virulent or resistant strains of pathogens
  • the rapid deployment and approval of dangerous gene therapy injections falsely labeled as ‘vaccines’
  • the deliberate exploitation of socioeconomic vulnerabilities through financial enticement on populations already marginalized by the healthcare system 
  • risk of long-term chronic illnesses due to the long-term impacts of pathogen exposure – known as pathogenic priming
  • repeated exposures to infection and then injection will likely cause autoimmunity as history has shown

Weiler calls for a ban on human challenge trials which is rooted in the principle of “first, do no harm,” a cornerstone of medical ethics that appears to be all but forgotten.

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses