https://www.activistpost.com/2021/03/u-s-court-rules-in-favor-of-property-owners-installing-5g-and-wi-fi-antennas-on-homes-without-notifying-neighbors-or-permit

U.S. Court Rules in Favor of Property Owners Installing 5G and Wi-Fi Antennas on Homes without Notifying Neighbors or Permit

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is supposed to protect Americans by regulating the telecom industry.  It has catered to the industry instead for decades (see 1, 2).  During the Trump administration lawsuits were filed against the agency for NOT protecting the public from unsafe levels of cell phone and WiFi radiation as well as 5G on Earth (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) and in space.

Despite another lawsuit and emergency injunction filed against the agency’s amended “OTARD Rule”, a court has ruled in favor of it.  Because of this, American property owners may install 5G and WiFi antennas that will broadcast into their neighborhoods without obtaining a permit or notifying anybody. (See link for article)

http://  Approx. 3 Min

The FCC & OTARD Rule

The FCC plans to amend an old Over-The-Air-Reception-Device (OTARD) rule to allow wireless companies to place 5G transmitters on private homes in your neighborhood, with no notice, no hearing, no opportunity for you to do anything about it. The FCC is supposed to work for the people, not the wireless companies. Please call Congressman Frank Pallone at (202) 225-4671 and ask him to hold hearings on the OTARD rule and stop the FCC!


____________________

**Comment**

Lyme/MSIDS patients often struggle with sensitivities – including EMFs.

Important excerpt:

Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit 5G installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums due to health, safety, environmental and economic risks.  The majority of scientists worldwide oppose deployment. If you are opposed to 5G, sign and share this letter asking President Biden and Vice President Harris to stop deployment ASAP.

This change in the OTARD rule is reminiscent of how our public ‘authorities’ have been using us to raise money for their biased, self-serving and flawed research regarding tick-borne illness.  Now, the FCC is using people – probably oblivious to the health ramifications of EMFs, especially on chronically ill people, to install their transmitters – bypassing reasonable debate.

Sign the letter and spread the word.

https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-who-data-ivermectin-reduces-covid-mortality-by-81-also-who-we-still-dont-recommend-it

Horowitz: WHO data: Ivermectin reduces COVID mortality by 81%. Also WHO: We still don’t recommend it.

Imagine if we could have saved 81% of those who ultimately died from the virus by treating them early with a cheap, safe drug, along with other cheap therapeutic cocktails. Well, for one, more people would be alive today. But more important to the powers at be, there would have been no excuse to fear the virus and sow panic and tyranny. Also, there would have been no market for expensive therapeutics and vaccines that are much more experimental and unproven. Which is likely why the WHO is refusing to recommend ivermectin for early COVID treatment, even as its own data prove it should be championed as a cure.

On Wednesday, the WHO updated its guide on therapeutics and COVID-19. Under ivermectin, the meta-analysis shows an 81% drop in mortality among those who used ivermectin as opposed to standard care. It also shows a 64% decrease in hospitalization. Nonetheless, the WHO refuses to endorse it because it claims the confidence level is low.  (See link for article)

_______________________

**Comment**

This is almost becoming comical.  Almost….

Important excerpt:

In total, there have been 49 studies, 26 of them randomized controlled trials, showing that ivermectin works against the virus. The pooled results show an 80% improvement when used early, 89% when used as prophylaxis, and even a 50% improvement at late stages. It is simply shocking that the global elites would continue to treat this long-used drug as experimental while treating novel vaccines that were only studied by the companies creating them as ironclad. Consider that the vaccines have not been approved by the FDA, on label or off label, there is no liability, and there is no data on long-term safety issues.

Lyme/MSIDS patients suffer from the same ignorance, misinformation, and evil. They are denied the very treatment that could help them – long term antimicrobials. For over 40 years a false narrative has been regurgitated, believed, and followed by mainstream medicine. Doctors are afraid to diagnose and treat Lyme/MSIDS, and anyone that defies the narrative is hunted down and persecuted – similarly to what’s happening with COVID.

We need a CDC/NIAID/FDA walkaway movement.
 

Recently, an online webinar called “The COVID Vaccine on Trial: If You Only Knew…..” revealed some interesting developments, one of which concerned the recent death of baseball legend Hank Aaron which occurred after receiving the COVID injection.  Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pointed out that Aaron’s death was part of a “wave of deaths among seniors, among elderly people, Americans, following vaccination.”  

He specifically and purposely avoided saying Aaron’s death was caused by the injection.

Aaron was used by the HHS in a press conference to persuade Black Americans to take the jab, but just 17 days later he died after getting it. Not a very convincing message.

Kennedy’s simple and natural observation was attacked and loudly condemned by mainstream media.

This is where it gets interesting.

All of the articles attacking Kennedy cited the Fulton County Coroner’s Office as their source, stating that Hank Aaron’s death was not caused by a vaccine.  Period.

After Kennedy “spent a lot of time waiting on telephones” to speak with the coroner’s office, he discovered that the office never had Hank Aaron’s body.  There was never an autopsy, post mortem, or necropsy done.  Evidently, his personal doctor just assumed he died of natural causes.  

The national press simply lied to the American public once again.  Source

The webinar pointed out many other important details:

  • The FDA has not approved or licensed these “vaccines.”  They are simply authorized as “may be effective.”
  • The FDA can only authorize these “vaccines” when there are no adequately approved alternatives.  This is why effective therapies like HCQ, Ivermectin, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, zinc, and others are shut-down.  
  • This is causing wide-spread censorship of doctors, research articles, and news articles advocating these interventions, as well as the promotion of fake science.
  • CDC officials have confirmed that state institutions cannot mandate these Messenger RNA vaccines, because the US has long upheld the first principle of the Nuremberg Code: that the consent of the individual is absolutely essential in any scientific experiment. These “vaccines” are experimental.
  • The reason it is advantageous to pharmaceutical companies, governments and healthcare providers to have these experimental products be under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is because it makes them risk-free. 
  • Under the PREP Act if you are injured or die you have to apply within a year to a government administrative program, not a court of law.  If your injury appears after a year you have no recourse.  There’s no hearing and if you lose there’s no appeal.  Everything is on paper – nothing in person – no witnesses, no experts, and no published decisions.  
  • Historically, this program has compensated under 8% of all petitions.
  • The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the four biggest vaccine manufacturers, Pfizer, Merck, GSK and Sanofi, have all been funding biotech firms, including those manufacturing the COVID vaccines today, looking for the next big thing in vaccine profits. Don’t think for a minute that the push to vaccinate the world will be over with COVID-19.
  • Dr. Tenpenny states: “Can you think of any other product in any other industry at any other point in time that has caused this much damage in eight weeks that is still on the market? And not only still on the market, but pushing full steam ahead to get a little bit of this in every person’s arm? So take a step back and think about what that actually means, and it’s a much bigger agenda, as I’m sure many of you know.”  She also points out mechanisms of injury (MOI):
    • anaphylaxis
    • anti-spike immunoglobulins: European epidemiologists state it can take up to 42 days after the shot to develop the highest concentrations of the anti-spike antibody
    • accelerated autoimmune reactions after exposure to other coronaviruses – no one knows how long that risk will be – 1 week, 1 month, 5 years?
    • accelerated risk of more severe side effects  as well as more likely to contract coronavirus infection if you’ve previously had a flu shot
    • antibody dependent enhancement or Trojan Horse phenomenon where your body uncontrollably replicates antibodies after re-exposure to coronaviruses that far supersedes anything you could contract naturally without previous vaccination
    • modification of anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages due to anti-spike immunoglobulin – animal studies showed their lungs were full of M1 macrophages and NO M2 macrophages at all
    • autoimmune disorders caused by anti-spike immunoglobulins, antibodies cross-reacting with human tissue. A study showed that 28 out of 55 tissue types cross-reacted with the anti-spike immunoglobulin, which is why people get extreme fatigue from this infection or vaccine, as well as all the neurological problems
    • Tenpenny states there are more than these 7 MOI
    • There are also more things coming through the syringe than what is listed on the Moderna patent.  RNA when it goes into your cells creates a protein called flagellin which causes a huge antibody response – the more the response, the more tissue destruction occurs.  It’s an unapproved adjuvant, never used before on animals and humans that will cause more havoc in the body – anywhere from 4-6 weeks or months in the future

I highly recommend you read the entire transcript as it is chuck-full of information including social justice issues that demand discussion.

I post this information for two reasons: 1) The mainstream media has become nothing more than an arm of pharmaceutical companies peddling their wares. This means you need to corroborate everything they say.  Regarding articles on tick-borne illness, I continue to correct blatant inaccuracies.  2) This experimental mRNA injection that isn’t a vaccine needs to be scrutinized and debated widely.  Many have come forth with serious accusations and details. While the injection manufacturers continue to state they are “safe and effective,” multitudes are experiencing life-changing severe reactions including death.  

https://danielcameronmd.com/lyme-disease-false-brain-tumor-child/  Podcast here

LYME DISEASE CAUSES “FALSE BRAIN TUMOR” IN YOUNG CHILD

brain-lyme-disease

Welcome to another Inside Lyme Podcast. I am your host Dr. Daniel Cameron. I find that the best way to get to know Lyme disease is through reviewing actual cases. In this episode, I’ll be discussing a case involving a 9-year-old boy with with a pseudotumor cerebri due to Lyme disease.

Ezequiel and colleagues first described this case in the British Medical Journal Case Reports in 2017.¹

Pseudotumor cerebri means “false brain tumor” because its symptoms are similar to those caused by brain tumors. It’s also known as idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Symptoms mimic brain tumor 

The boy was admitted to the hospital with “daily pulsatile frontotemporal headache, pallor, photophobia and phonophobia, without night awakening, vomiting or visual changes,” the authors write. (Photophobia is sensitivity to light. Phonophobia is fear or aversion to sound.)

The doctors found papilloedema, which is swelling of the optic disc but no neck pain. A CT scan of the patient’s head was normal. He had an increased opening pressure in his spinal tap. In other words, the fluid removed from his spinal tap was under higher pressure.

Pseudotumor cerebri is a condition caused by elevated cerebrospinal fluid pressure in the brain.

The boy was diagnosed with a pseudotumor. Pseudotumor cerebri is a condition caused by elevated cerebrospinal fluid pressure in the brain. Symptoms can mimic a brain tumor, but in fact are due to intracranial pressure in the head.

He was prescribed acetazolamide while undergoing further evaluation. (Acetazolamide is a diuretic and carbonic anhydrase inhibitor medication that is used to reduce eye pressure.)

The boy was tested for a wide range of bacterial and viral infections, all of which were negative.

Treatment for neuroborreliosis 

He lived in Portugal and because he had visited the countryside prior to developing symptoms, he was tested for Lyme disease. A Western blot and spinal tap revealed he was positive.

The boy was diagnosed with Lyme disease and treated with a 21-day course of intravenous ceftriaxone. He recovered completely.

The authors point out, “CSF [cerebral spinal fluid] changes are not common, so in their presence, it is compulsory to investigate an infectious origin, as happened in this case, as the intracranial hypertension might be the only symptom of a central nervous system infection.”

Furthermore, “Borrelia infections should be actively investigated in children with central nervous system disease even in non-endemic areas.”

The following questions are addressed in this Podcast:

1. What is Pseudotumor cerebri and why is it referred to as ‘false brain tumor?’
2. What are the causes and how is it diagnosed?
3. How often does pseudotumor cerebri occur in Lyme disease?
4. Can it be the only manifestation of Lyme disease?
5. Can you discuss the boy’s initial treatment?
6. What are your thoughts on the treatment he received for Lyme disease?

    Thanks for listening to another Inside Lyme Podcast. You can read more about these cases in my show notes and on my website @DanielCameronMD.com. As always, it is your likes, comments, reviews, and shares that help spread the word about Lyme disease. Until next time on Inside Lyme.

Please remember that the advice given is general and not intended as specific advice as to any particular patient. If you require specific advice, then please seek that advice from an experienced professional.

Inside Lyme Podcast Series

This Inside Lyme case series will be discussed on my Facebook and made available on podcast and YouTube.  As always, it is your likes, comments, and shares that help spread the word about this series and our work. If you can, please leave a review on iTunes or wherever else you get your podcasts.

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf

Current serology is no better than a coin toss

MAR 31, 2021 — 

Please see the letter below addressed to the Chair of the NH Lyme Disease Study Commission in reference to a presentation from our last Zoom meeting.

You can hear/see my arguments at 1:01 in the recorded YouTube video link below.

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: William Marsh <wmarshmd@gmail.com> CHAIR
Cc: All members of the study group
Date: 03/31/2021 8:59 AM
Subject: Topic for discussion at our next meeting (Dr. Martin’s Presentation)

I would like to add the following letter of concern as a topic for discussion at our next meeting and have copied all committee members so they can review the document prior to the meeting. 

Please reserve any discussion of these documents until our next scheduled Zoom meeting.

To members of the Lyme Study Commission,

Dear Rep Marsh,
I have some serious concerns regarding Dr. Martin’s informative presentation last Friday.

In reference to the 2013 C6 Elisa paper from Dr. Wormser, [1] this test is not widely used here in the US for the detection of Borrelia infections. When performing a search on the Quest Diagnostics website, I could not find the C6 Elisa listed as an option for Lyme disease.

Furthermore, test performance from that 2013 Wormser paper and 2018 pegalajar-jurado et al publication [2] was derived through the use of serum samples from patients who had the positive marker for Lyme; erythema migrans (bulls-eye rash) so testing results for the newer serology were positive because they were already positive. There was no performance data for those who never developed the bulls-eye rash. Once again this is misleading to the reader and highly inaccurate in real-world application. (what front line physicians are experiencing) Maine Department of Health is reporting incidence of rash at only 50%. So, half of the patient population is not being represented in these studies. That is a serious concern.
 
To my knowledge, the Modified Two-Tiered Testing Algorithm (MTTTA) is not in use outside of Dr. Martin’s lab and irrelevant to our study commission at this time so any performance numbers offered by Dr. Martin are meaningless. Until such time that these newer tests are fully implemented (if ever) performance characteristics should not be acknowledged or posted in the minutes of the Lyme Study Commission.

Although current testing methods are evolving, we are still using the conventional WCS ELISA–immunoblot-based 2-tier testing algorithm. Dr. Durand (ILADS physician) and I have provided documentation supporting the fact that current serology is no better than a coin toss and this fact must be shared with the public along with the fact that humans do not produce antibodies for 4-6 weeks after a tick bite.

Here are the missing disclaimers:

1. “Health-care providers are reminded that a diagnosis of Lyme disease should be made after evaluation of a patient’s clinical presentation and risk for exposure to infected ticks, and, if indicated, after the use of validated laboratory tests.

2. “This surveillance case definition (two of three IgM and Five of ten IgG bands) was developed for national reporting of Lyme disease; it is not intended to be used in clinical diagnosis”

Respectfully submitted,

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH

References

1. Single-tier testing with the C6 peptide ELISA kit compared with two-tier testing for Lyme disease
 https://demystifyingmedicine.od.nih.gov/dm13/2013-03-19/dmid-v75-y2013-p9.pdf

2. Evaluation of Modified Two-Tiered Testing Algorithms for Lyme Disease Laboratory Diagnosis Using Well-Characterized Serum Samples
 https://jcm.asm.org/content/56/8/e01943-17

______________________

For more:

There has been a concerted effort by ‘authoritie’s against direct testing. 

The simple reason for this is our public health ‘authorities’ have patents on Lyme testing.

They also want us to take their controversial Lyme vaccines which would only work if Lyme disease does not cause chronic illness – hence the denial of persistent infection.  Our public authorities also have conflicts of interests regarding these vaccines.

The CDC is not to be trusted at all.  

We need to stop working with these agencies and raising money for their flawed, biased science that continues to abuse and neglect sick patients.