Welcome to Clown World: Bayer Sues Pfizer & Moderna For Using Monsanto’s Patented GMO Technology to Build COVID Vaccines Which Are Indistinguishable From Bio-Chemical Weapons

January 12, 2026

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/bayer-lawsuit-claims-pfizer-moderna-used-monsantos-gmo-technology-covid-vaccines/?

Bayer Lawsuit Claims Pfizer, Moderna Used Monsanto’s GMO Technology to Build COVID Vaccines

Bayer on Tuesday filed a federal lawsuit, accusing Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson of unlawfully using mRNA optimization technology — originally developed by Monsanto to genetically engineer crops — as the platform for their COVID-19 vaccines, Reuters reported. Bayer acquired Monsanto in 2018.

by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
January 8, 2026This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
mrna vaccine and bayer logo

Bayer is suing COVID-19 vaccine makers Pfizer,  Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (J&J) in federal court.

The chemical giant on Tuesday accused the drugmakers of unlawfully using mRNA optimization technology — originally developed by Monsanto — as the platform for their COVID-19 vaccines, Reuters reported.

Bayer acquired Monsanto in 2018 for $63 billion.

The lawsuits claim the three companies used Monsanto’s decades-old patented technology for removing “problem sequences” from genetic code to improve mRNA stability and protein expression — obstacles the vaccine makers had previously identified as key challenges in vaccine development.

Even though J&J used a viral vector, not mRNA technology, for its vaccine, the lawsuit alleges J&J also relied on the same patented genetic engineering techniques to stabilize and amplify protein expression in its vaccines.

“Welcome to clown world,” the McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher wrote on Substack, commenting on the lawsuit.

“One of the world’s largest agrochemical companies — responsible for mass harm through its highly toxic herbicide glyphosate — is now in federal court claiming that the deadly COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ platforms were built on stolen GMO [genetically modified organism] technology.”

In the court filings, Bayer said it doesn’t want to interfere with the production of the COVID-19 vaccines, or any other mRNA vaccines. Instead, it seeks a cut of the profits from the most lucrative pharmaceutical products in history. (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

In the the end, evil always eats its own.

Interestingly, Glyphosate has been found in all five vaccines recently tested, the COVID shots have been shown to induce cancer in 17 distinct ways according to more than 100 studies, and a major cancer journal has confirmed a global turbo cancer safety signal.

Glyphosate, cancer, and COVID shots appear to be synonymous

Please notice Bayer makes sure to posture itself by stating it wouldn’t dream of interfering with the production of the shot shots, it just wants a financial cut.

Well, isn’t that humanitarian of them?

For any still denying it, this drives the nail in the coffin that the clot shots are built with GMO technology, only instead of putting it in your mouth, you roll up your sleeve to get it injected into your muscle, which then spreads systemically and accumulates everywhere.

The shots are proven to be dangerous, unsafe and ineffective, so the experiment failed radically.
Pull them off the market already!

________________

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/my-testimony-for-the-case-in-the

Covid Shots are Indistinguishable From Bio-Chemical Weapons

My written testimony for the case in the Netherlands against the orchestrators of the global democide falsely presented as the “Covid-19 pandemic response”.

Sasha Latypova
Dec 26, 2025

This post is very long as it contains my full written testimony for the Dutch court. The post is structured into:

  1. Case Background and video links to RechtOprecht YT channel
  2. The news coverage of the case
  3. The smear campaign
  4. Executive Summary of my testimony
  5. Full testimony

1. Case Background:

As an introduction for those who are unaware of this case, this is a short video message from Peter Stassen, the only remaining attorney on the case. His colleague, Arno van Kessel, has been imprisoned on [fabricated] charges of terrorism and disbarred:

http://  Approx. 9 Min

Peter Stassen: The Great Reset on Trial

Dec. 15, 2025

Attorney Peter Stassen has brought a lawsuit against the architects of The Great Reset and has entered testimony from experts Sasha Latypova, Catherine Austin Fitts, Dr. Joeseph Sansone, Dr. Michael Yeadon, and Katherine Watt, into the record, to prove Bill Gates, Mark Rutte, and Albert Bourla have committed crimes against humanity.

2. The News Coverage:

Recent article by The Defender providing an excellent summary of the case and developments to date:

Expert witnesses: COVID shots ‘indistinguishable from bioweapons’

During the press conference, Stassen also noted his efforts to have the Dutch courts accept his expert witnesses’ in-person testimony. He said the witnesses intend to present evidence showing that the COVID-19 shots:

  • Are “indistinguishable from bioweapons.”
  • Offer “no health benefits whatsoever.”
  • Are “neither safe nor effective.”
  • Were released in the U.S. under emergency use authorization, “a legal status that removes the enforcement of the pharmaceutical law and consumer safeguards by the FDA,” or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  • Are “by design, intended to cause the damage described in the package insert and reports as ‘side effects’” — including, “sudden death, heart failure, cancer, and the most horrific diseases.”
  • Are a “key component” of the “Great Reset,” “a military project in which NATO plays a significant role.”

This is coverage of this case from a Dutch newspaper (click on the English translation button): “Court rules that the defendants must show up to the hearing in person”

(See link for article & video.  An incredible amount of work went into this by Latypova et. al)

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Comments Off on Welcome to Clown World: Bayer Sues Pfizer & Moderna For Using Monsanto’s Patented GMO Technology to Build COVID Vaccines Which Are Indistinguishable From Bio-Chemical Weapons

USDA Issues New Food Pyramid

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/bombshell-maha-win-rfk-jr-orders?

BOMBSHELL MAHA WIN: RFK Jr. Orders Americans To “EAT REAL FOOD” & Resets The USDA Food Pyramid

2nd Smartest Guy in the World
Jan 07, 2026
Article Excerpts:

Until just now, the wholly corrupt and captured USDA was pushing a food pyramid that can only be described as a crime against health…This original food pyramid was promoting all of the cheap high carb and high sugar GMO poisons at the expense of nutrient dense foods precisely because just like BigPharma owns the FDA, BigAgra used to own the the USDA.

Thanks to ultra-processed foods, sugary drinks, rampant glyphosate contamination and other pernicious dietary fare, the U.S. is currently in the midst of a national health emergency, with nearly 90% of health care spending going toward treating chronic disease, much of it linked to diet, lifestyle, Modified mRNA slow kill bioweapon “vaccines,” and vaccines in general.

More than 70% of American adults are overweight or obese, and nearly 1 in 3 adolescents has prediabetes due to toxic diets that are inducing a chronic disease epidemic. It has gotten so dire that most young Americans are unable to qualify for military service, which is now for all intents and purposes a national emergency.

But if you go to the USDA’s swanky new site real food, you are treated to the following revised healthful approach.

According to Professor Peter St Onge, Ph.D:

USDA issues New Food Pyramid
– Meat is king
– Whole milk, not skim milk
– Eggs are off the naughty list
– Sugary fruits demoted
– Lucky Charms no longer rank higher than steak
The world is healing.

Category:

Activism, diet and nutrition

Comments Off on USDA Issues New Food Pyramid

Tell EPA to Ban Glyphosate Now

January 8, 2026

https://organicconsumers.org/organic-bytes-newsletter-924-the-glyphosate-crisis-why-immediate-action-is-needed/

TAKE ACTION

Tell the EPA to Ban Glyphosate Now

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is facing an October 1, 2026, deadline to reassess the safety of glyphosate, a widely used weedkiller linked to serious health concerns.

With a major scientific 25-year-old landmark study relied upon to prove the safety of glyphosate recently retracted, it’s clear that the EPA must take immediate action to move up the reassessment date!

The facts should be alarming to us all: the key paper relied on by the EPA for glyphosate safety assessments was retracted due to serious ethical concerns and questions about the validity of the research findings. The study’s conclusions were based on unpublished data from Monsanto, and the authors did not disclose financial compensation they received from Monsanto for their work.

Bayer has paid out over $10 billion in 100,000 Roundup cancer cases, and faces massive liability from thousands of additional lawsuits alleging its Roundup herbicide (with glyphosate being the active ingredient) causes cancer, so it is no surprise that Bayer is seeking to avoid liability in ongoing lawsuits related to glyphosate exposure by including pursuing appeals, lobbying for legislation, and seeking U.S. Supreme Court intervention.

Due to mounting scientific evidence linking glyphosate to cancer and other severe health issues in humans and animals, and concerns about its impact on pollinators and ecosystems, we need to act now!

TAKE ACTION NOW: Tell the EPA to prioritize public health and safety over industry interests by reopening the decision on glyphosate’s safety immediately and ban glyphosate to end the ongoing chemical assault on our land, water, and health!

Category:

Activism

Comments Off on Tell EPA to Ban Glyphosate Now

When the Vaccine Schedule Changes, Vaccinators Panic: Watch Who Screams Loudest

When the Vaccine Schedule Changes, the Vaccinators Panic

By Susan Sweetin

NVIC’s Chief Marketing Officer

This week, officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention quietly did something extraordinary, something the co-founders and followers of NVIC have been championing for over four decades.

They thoughtfully changed the childhood vaccine schedule.

The schedule was changed to align more with streamlined vaccine schedules of other developed nations like Denmark. The changes were fundamental enough to trigger a near-instant legacy media pile-on characterized by political outrage and what can only be described as pharmaceutical industry-driven panic.

Within hours, headlines rolled out notifying the public of the change: 

  • “What to Know About the New Childhood Vaccine Schedule”
  • “Health officials slash the number of vaccines recommended for all kids”
  • “CDC changes childhood immunization schedule, removing universal recommendation for multiple shots”
  • “CDC Slashes Universal Vaccine Recommendations”

And then came the tone shift – from reporting to orchestrated narrative.

It didn’t take long for PR agencies and media outlets representing old guard mandatory vaccinators to go on the attack. Opinion writers scolded the public for doubting the safety and urgent need to give children more than 72 doses of 17 vaccines.  Senators questioned the legitimacy of HHS policymakers reducing the number of recommended vaccine doses by more than 50 percent . Cable news framed the schedule change as dangerously confusing for parents and doctors. 

The message from the vaccinators is clear: nothing needs to change and you don’t need to think, you just need to trust us and do what we tell you to do.  

That reaction tells you everything.

The Science Didn’t Collapse, It Changed Who Decides.

As Barbara Loe Fisher explained in her June 2023 commentary “It Is Time to Declare Our Independence from the Vaccinators,”  (watch it here), from the very first vaccine for smallpox, the mass vaccination system has suffered from a structural conflict of interest through a tangled web of lucrative public-private business partnerships powered by chemical companies and governments. The same individuals who develop, sell, regulate, promote, monitor, administer and mandate vaccines also have dominated the U.S. vaccine advisory committees making national vaccine policy recommendations. 

That model depends on uniform compliance. The moment vaccine recommendations shift away from the “one-size-fits-all” and “no exceptions” approach, the illusion of inevitability cracks with it and there is room for the informed consent principle, not authority and coercion, to prevail.

Universal Vaccine Mandates Are About Control, Not Health

Universal vaccine use recommendations are administratively convenient. They are politically powerful. They are profitable. They are not synonymous with personalized medicine.

When CDC officials adjust the vaccine schedule – even modestly – it implicitly acknowledges what parents have been saying for years: children are not biologically all alike, not interchangeable units, and the risks of vaccines are not evenly distributed.

That acknowledgment inherent in the recent childhood vaccine schedule change is what rattles the system. Because once medical decisions are personalized out of respect for the life of each individual, coercion becomes indefensible and informed consent must be allowed. 

Watch Who Screams the Loudest Right Now

Notice who is most alarmed by the schedule change:

  • media outlets that dismissed parental concerns for decades
  • political figures who default to “trust the experts” rhetoric
  • commentators framing truth and transparency as chaos

And notice what’s missing:

  • calm explanations of why the vaccine schedule change was made
  • acknowledgment that science evolves and nothing stays the same 
  • respect for freedom of thought and conscience as parents navigate medical decisions for their children 

Instead, the public is being warned – not informed.

Independence Was Always the Threat

NVIC has consistently stated that true vaccine policy reform begins with restoring the foundational principle of informed consent to medical risk taking – the ethical standard articulated in the Nuremberg Code that applies to all medical interventions in experimental and clinical settings alike. See NVIC’s Guide to Reforming Vaccine Policy and Law here.

The orchestrated negative reaction to this childhood vaccine schedule change confirms that the real concern of mandatory vaccinators is not measles, pertussis, COVID, or other infectious diseases, it’s public awareness that the final decision about vaccination belongs to the individual, including parents of minor children, and not to a doctor or public health official.

A Final Thought

If vaccine schedules are as scientifically unassailable as we’re told, then transparency should strengthen public trust, not threaten it.

And if the medical and public health institutions respond to every vaccine policy change with outrage, blame, and media hype promoting false narratives, then the problem isn’t public confusion, it’s institutional insecurity.
 

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Comments Off on When the Vaccine Schedule Changes, Vaccinators Panic: Watch Who Screams Loudest

Eye Pain in Lyme Disease

https://danielcameronmd.com/eye-pain-lyme-disease-eye-exams/

Eye Pain in Lyme Disease: Why It Occurs Despite Normal Eye Exams

Lyme Science Blog

Jan07

Eye Pain in Lyme Disease: Why It Occurs Despite Normal Eye Exams

Posted By: Dr. Daniel Cameron

A Patient Experience

A man with Lyme disease described persistent eye pain and pressure despite repeated normal eye exams. He worried that something serious was being missed, yet ophthalmologic evaluations and imaging were reassuring. The pain fluctuated and worsened with fatigue and stress. Over time, the eye pain gradually improved.

This pattern is one I see frequently in Lyme disease and other post-infectious conditions. In many patients, this type of eye pain reflects a broader pattern of autonomic and neurologic dysregulation  associated with Lyme disease.

In simple terms, the eyes can hurt even when nothing looks wrong because the nerves that carry pain signals become overly sensitive. The problem is not damage to the eye, but how the nervous system is processing sensation.

Eye Pain in Lyme Disease With Normal Eye Exams

Eye pain in Lyme disease is a common but often misunderstood symptom. Patients may describe aching, pressure, stabbing discomfort, or pain behind the eyes, yet ophthalmologic exams, imaging, and vision testing are frequently normal. This disconnect can be confusing for patients and frustrating for clinicians.

A normal eye exam is reassuring because it rules out dangerous eye conditions. However, it does not rule out neurologic, autonomic, or post-infectious mechanisms that can produce very real pain. When eye exams and imaging are normal, this type of pain is rarely a sign of structural eye damage or vision-threatening disease. Patients may describe this as eye strain, eye pressure, or pain behind the eyes rather than sharp eye pain.

Sensory Nerve Involvement in Lyme Disease

The eyes and surrounding structures are richly innervated by sensory branches of the trigeminal nerve. In Lyme disease, immune activation and inflammation can sensitize these nerves, altering how pain signals are transmitted to the brain.

When sensory nerves become hypersensitive, patients may experience eye pain even in the absence of visible injury or structural abnormality. Pain may worsen with eye movement, mental effort, or light exposure. This reflects altered nerve signaling, not damage to the eye itself.

Central Sensitization and Pain Amplification

In some patients with Lyme disease, prolonged illness or repeated inflammatory flares lead to changes in how the brain processes pain. This phenomenon, known as central sensitization, causes the nervous system to amplify sensory input.

Once sensitization develops, normal sensory signals around the eyes may be perceived as painful or overwhelming. This process is biologic and neurologic in nature and does not imply that symptoms are imagined or psychological.

Autonomic Nervous System Dysregulation

The autonomic nervous system plays a role in regulating blood flow, pressure sensation, and sensory integration around the eyes. Dysautonomia is well described in Lyme disease and other post-infectious states.

Autonomic dysregulation can produce sensations of pressure, fullness, or discomfort behind the eyes. Patients often notice symptoms worsen with standing, fatigue, dehydration, or stress — patterns that point toward nervous system involvement rather than ocular disease.

Migraine Pathways in Lyme Disease

Migraines do not always present as classic throbbing head pain. In Lyme disease, migraine-like pathways may produce eye-centered pain, pressure, or light sensitivity even when headaches are minimal or absent.

When eye pain responds poorly to eye-directed treatments but fluctuates with sleep, stress, or sensory overload, a neurologic mechanism should be considered. Migraine pathways, autonomic dysfunction, and central sensitization overlap in Lyme disease.

Post-Infectious and Immune-Mediated Mechanisms

After infection, the nervous system may remain in a heightened state of reactivity. In Lyme disease, ongoing immune signaling or residual inflammation can keep sensory pathways sensitized even after initial treatment.

In clinical practice, some patients report improvement in eye pain as their overall condition stabilizes, while others experience a slower post-infectious recovery. Not all patients improve at the same pace.

Why Reassurance Alone Isn’t Enough

Being told that eye exams are normal can feel dismissive when pain persists. Eye pain without visible disease is not imagined. It reflects real changes in how the nervous system processes sensory input.

Understanding the mechanism restores trust and supports more thoughtful evaluation and care.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is eye pain in Lyme disease dangerous?
Eye pain is usually not dangerous when eye exams are normal. However, new vision loss, rapidly worsening pain, or focal neurologic symptoms should prompt further evaluation.

Is this an eye disease?
Not usually. In Lyme disease, eye pain most often reflects nerve sensitivity, migraine pathways, or autonomic dysregulation rather than a problem within the eye itself.

Can eye pain improve over time?
In some patients, eye pain improves gradually as nervous system sensitivity decreases. Recovery timelines vary.

Clinical Takeaway

Eye pain despite normal eye exams is a well-recognized manifestation of Lyme disease. It most often reflects neurologic, autonomic, or post-infectious mechanisms rather than structural eye disease. Recognizing this pattern helps prevent unnecessary testing, validates patient experience, and supports more effective care.

Selected Clinical References

Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences Fallon BA, Levin ES, Schweitzer PJ, Hardesty D. The neuropsychiatric manifestations of Lyme borreliosis. 2008;20(2):123–135.

Frontiers in Neurology Adler BL, Vernino S. Dysautonomia following Lyme disease: a key component of post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome? 2024;15:1344862.

Pain Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. 2011;152(3 Suppl):S2–S15.

Lancet Neurology Tracey I, Mantyh PW. The cerebral signature for pain perception and its modulation. 2007;6(4):377–391.

Autonomic Neuroscience Vernino S, Bourne KM, Stiles LE, Grubb BP, Fedorowski A, Stewart JM, et al. Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): state of the science and clinical care from a 2019 NIH expert consensus meeting. 2021;235:102828.

For more:

Normally, I associate eye issues with Bartonella, but it’s clear from all the references above, Lyme is a culprit as well:

Category:

Eye Issues, Lyme, Treatment

Comments Off on Eye Pain in Lyme Disease