https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/darpa-uses-ai-to-push-viral-pandemic?p

DARPA Uses AI to Push Viral Pandemic Outbreak Modeling From Weeks to Days

Speed is being prioritized over scrutiny, with AI-generated models designed to justify interventions before they can be meaningfully challenged.

The U.S. military is funding artificial intelligence (AI) systems designed to drastically accelerate viral outbreak modeling—compressing a process that typically takes weeks into something that can be produced in days, then used to steer real-world interventions.

In other words, the faster the model, the less time there is to question whether the response is justified at all.

This acceleration follows DARPA’s already-documented pre-COVID pandemic infrastructure  designed to turn digital genetic sequences into synthesized viruses and mass-produced mRNA countermeasures on a fixed timeline. (See link for article)

_______________

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/us-military-funds-intranasal-spray?

U.S. Military Funds Intranasal Spray Self-Replicating sa-mRNA H5N1 Bird Flu Vaccine Built From Chimeric Viral Constructs: Journal ‘Nature Communications’

U.S. government is not slowing its push toward intranasal self-replicating RNA vaccine technology.

A U.S. military–funded research program has developed an intranasal, self-replicating RNA (sa-mRNA) vaccine targeting H5N1 avian influenza, built using chimeric viral constructs assembled through reverse genetics.

The work was disclosed in a 2026 Nature Communications paper and explicitly funded through a U.S. Army–administered biodefense contracting mechanism.

The vaccine is said to force cells to produce H5N1 bird flu antigen while simultaneously producing viral replication enzymes that copy the self-amplifying RNA inside the cell.

The U.S. government is funding the creation of next-generation bird flu vaccines while funding the creation of purported chimeric “Frankenstein” bird flu viruses.

Congress, the White House, the Department of Energy, the FBI, the CIA, and Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) have confirmed that the COVID-19 pandemic was likely the result of lab-engineered pathogen manipulation.

Why is the government making the bird flu pandemic problem and solution at the same time, just like it was doing with coronaviruses before the COVID-19 outbreak?  (See link for article)

____________

What could possibly go wrong?

The war is on…..

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2026/01/aap-and-other-medical-groups-sue-secretary-of-health-and-human-services/

AAP and Other Medical Groups Sue Secretary of Health and Human Services

Large medical groups including the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) have sued U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in response to recent changes to federal vaccine policy, including removal of the COVID shot from the federally recommended childhood vaccine schedule for healthy children  The AAP, American College of Physicians, Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), American Public Health Association, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Massachusetts Public Health Alliance, and a pregnant woman filed a lawsuit in July 2025 against HHS Secretary Kennedy in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.1

Plaintiffs alleged that changes to federal vaccine policy were made without scientific review and without following regulatory norms. They argued that the replacement of 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the cancellation of certain advisory meetings not only violated federal law, but also serves to erode public confidence in the public health infrastructure and the federal government’s mass vaccination program.

Plaintiffs aim to stop the vaccine policy changes implemented by Kennedy and restore the previous vaccine schedule.2 Plaintiffs further allege that the replacement of previous ACIP members created a new panel of biased members in order to support Kennedy’s views on vaccination and the harm associated with mRNA biologics such as the COVID shot.3

Federal Judge Allows Case to Continue

The government moved to have the case dismissed for lack of standing, but on Jan. 6, 2026, a Massachusetts federal judge decided that the lawsuit can continue.

In order to bring a lawsuit, a party needs standing which means they have shown they suffered actual and direct harm from the challenged action.4 Judge Brian Murphy of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled that the plaintiffs have legal standing to sue the Secretary.

The government argued that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue because they failed to show that they suffered direct harm from the new vaccine schedule and the changes that took place as a result of ACIP recommendations. However, Judge Murphy concluded that the changes at ACIP violates the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which sets forth that membership on government advisory panels be “fairly balanced.”5  (See link for article)

Important quote:

While I am somewhat surprised that the court found that plaintiffs have standing to sue here, [the ruling] reflects misperceptions about vaccines and children’s health generally [and the decision] does not reflect the reality that the American Academy of Pediatrics and other organizations are in many respects trade organizations for their professionsprimarily protecting the interests of their members, not children.7 ~ Kim Mack Rosenbert, Attorney for CHD

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/breaking-imas-national-network-of?

Breaking: IMA’s National Network of Independent Doctors Anchors New Coalition to End Medical Mandates in all 50 States

“This is the next step in bringing patient-centered reform to American healthcare. We’re mobilizing thousands of independent doctors to dismantle medical mandates state by state” – Dr. Joseph Varon

 
new coalition

“This is the next step in bringing patient-centered reform to American healthcare. We’re mobilizing thousands of independent doctors to dismantle medical mandates state by state, restoring true patient-informed choice and freedom.” – Dr. Joseph Varon

The Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), a powerhouse network of independent physicians, providers, and researchers, today announced its role as a founding member of the Medical Freedom Act Coalition. Launched alongside Stand for Health Freedom (SHF) and Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF), this alliance unites over a dozen organizations to prohibit medical mandates in all 50 states and safeguard informed consent, parental rights, and doctor-patient autonomy.

“America’s patchwork of coercive mandates is eroding patient rights,” said IMA President and Chief Medical Officer Dr. Joseph Varon. “We’re mobilizing thousands of independent doctors to dismantle them state by state and restore true freedom of choice in healthcare decisions.”

Building on Idaho’s groundbreaking 2025 Medical Freedom Act, the coalition targets the coercive regulations eroding personal health freedoms. IMA mobilizes its tens of thousands of doctors to drive state-level reforms, ensuring no American faces discrimination over medical decisions.

“No American should fear that their medical choices will impact their right to live a normal life,” said HFDF Founder Leslie Manookian in an announcement news release.

See the full Health Freedom Defense Fund news release here. For more information, contact Lynne@IMAHealth.org.

 

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/us-intelligence-classified-and-redacted?

U.S. Intelligence Classified and Redacted Findings on COVID-19 PCR Tests: New FOIA Documents

New records show top U.S. nuclear, national security laboratories scrutinized primers used to define the pandemic—but hid the results.

Newly released Department of Energy (DOE) records obtained by U.S. Right to Know through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request show that U.S. federal intelligence agencies classified and redacted the results of an internal review of COVID-19 PCR test primers, even as those tests were used to define “cases,” drive emergency policy, and justify unprecedented social and economic controls.

The documents reveal that during the pandemic, the U.S. government quietly subjected PCR test primer sets—the molecular components that determine what PCR tests detect—to classified scrutiny by top national security laboratories, while withholding the findings from the public under national-security and intelligence exemptions.

At the center of the release is a classified internal communication titled “DRAFT memo on Primer Sets,” circulated through the DOE’s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence and reviewed by assay experts at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

The memo itself remains classified.

Its conclusions were redacted.

No public explanation was ever provided.

PCR Testing Was Treated as a Classified Intelligence Issue

PCR tests do not detect an intact virus and do not prove infection.

They work by using short genetic sequences—primers—to bind to matching genetic material and amplify it until a signal is detected.

What a PCR test detects depends entirely on what its primers bind to. (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

What this means is while the public was repeatedly told COVID testing was reliable, specific, and settled science, the test was never handled in a public scientific manner but as a classified intelligence issue.

This should tell you everything you need to know, but it’s actually far worse.

In 2020 we were warned about the CDC’s monopolized COVID testing – something those in Lymeland have had to live with for over 40 years.

Experts have now shown repeatedly that the genetic sequences used in PCRs to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 as well as the flu, and to diagnose cases of illness and death attributed to Covid-19 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes. And that includes the initiators or primers, the most extensive fragments taken at random from their supposed “genome” and even the so-called “target genes” allegedly specific to the “new coronavirus”.

The test is worthless and all “positive” results obtained so far should be scientifically invalidated and communicated to those affected; and if they are deceased, to their relatives. Stephen Bustin, one of the world’s leading experts on PCR, in fact says that under certain conditions anyone can test positive.

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/the-replacement-for-pcr-tests-has?  Go here for article & video interview

The Replacement for PCR Tests Has Arrived

Dr. Roger Hodkinson breaks down how MultiSeq could replace PCR and fix infectious disease testing with multi-target panels and confirmatory Sanger sequencing.

The COVID era exposed a diagnostic failure that can no longer be ignored: PCR-based testing is not a true “gold standard” for clinical infection diagnosis. PCR is widely treated as definitive, but mechanistically it is not an identification method—it is an amplification step that simply makes more copies of genetic material. The real weakness comes from what many systems use after amplification: probe-based fluorescence detection, which generates a “signal” without actually confirming what is present. That is how medicine ends up with false positives, misclassification, and policy decisions built on unstable data.

In my interview with Dr. Roger Hodkinson—a highly respected pathologist and Chairman of MultiSeq—he explains why the PCR problem is structural: probe-based testing functions like a “lock-and-key,” where partial matches can still trigger a positive signal. Even worse, infectious syndromes (cough/cold, diarrhea, suspected STI) are rarely caused by only one organism—yet most PCR workflows are narrow, slow, and often treated as confirmatory when they’re not. In practice, clinicians are forced into an “educated guess” model because results frequently come back days later and only cover a limited scope.

MultiSeq is attempting to replace this entire model with something fundamentally different: sequence-confirmed diagnosis. Instead of relying on probe fluorescence to “suggest” identity, it uses modified Sanger sequencing to directly read the nucleotide sequence and confirm which pathogen is actually present.  (See link for article & video)

Webinar: Treating Lyme and Tick-Borne Diseases on a Budget

Date: Wednesday, March 18

Time: 6:00-7:00 PM ET

Presenter: Teresa Holler, MS, PA-C, FMAPS

Free to ILADS members/$49 for non-members

Register Here

Description:

Teresa will discuss a simple, effective, and well researched approach to utilizing herbals in the management of Lyme disease, bartonella, and babesia. Participants will leave the presentation with treatment options that are easy to implement.

Upon completion of Teresa’s presentation, participants will be aware of the following:

• Unique signs and symptoms to help differentiate between borrelia, bartonella, and babesia by history and physical exam
• What causes microbial persistence and how to address these difficulties
• Awareness of clinical studies comparing several antibiotic protocols to herbal products
• Review the properties of the most efficacious herbs for the treatment of Lyme disease, bartonella and babesia.

This webinar will be recorded and sent to all registered attendees.

Available through ILADS

To access the FREE 1.5 hour ILADS December webinar titled “At the Frontlines of Chronic Illness: A Conversation with ILADS Experts”, go here.

It features ILADS panelists:

  • Chris Winfrey, MD
  • Melanie Stein, ND
  • Nicole Bell (Galaxy Diagnostics)
  • Tania Dempsey, MD responding to patient questions

This protocol was derived by the author’s personal experience, which is often how we move forward in health.  It’s amazing what you can find when you are desperate for yourself or your loved ones.  This is certainly true in Lymeland. The sick and infected are the ones who find answers.

https://justusrhope.substack.com/p/how-to-reduce-cancer-risk-by-90-using?

How to Reduce Cancer Risk by 90% Using Evidence-Based Natural Compounds

The Most Practical ROOT™ Protocol Solution in the Modern Era

Article Excerpts:

This is the first time a 90% cancer prevention threshold has been achieved using six or fewer readily available, over-the-counter agents—making it both scientifically sound and practically achievable for the majority of people.

The author then traces hidden sources of carcinogens that drive cancer:

  • processed meat at 3 daily servings elevates colorectal cancer risk to levels comparable to heavy smoking
  • sugar-sweetened beverages create a metabolic environment that systematically promotes cancer growth
  • advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) caused by high temperature cooking, food additives and ultra-processed foods (UPFs) operate as independent carcinogens multiplying cancer risk beyond sugar and processed ingredients alone, driving chronic inflammation, promoting tumor cell growth and immune evasion and creating hypoxic conditions
  • fast food
  • synergistic combination of the 4 carcinogens listed above creates catastrophic AGE accumulation – a continuous state of cellular damage and malignant transformation
By eliminating the carcinogen listed and adopting Mediterranean-style eating, overall cancer is reduced 50-66% across multiple cancers – which rivals or exceeds pharmaceutical interventions.

Dosage Protocol: Nine Agents Daily

  1. Vitamin D3: 1000-2000 IU
  2. Curcumin: 500-1000 mg + piperine
  3. EGCG: 400-800 mg
  4. Omega-3 (EPA/DHA): 1000-2000 mg (500-1000 mg for prostate)
  5. Aged Garlic Extract: 2.4 mL daily OR 600-900 mg standardized extract
  6. Sulforaphane: 40-60 mg daily (2 tablespoons fresh broccoli sprouts OR supplement)
  7. Berberine: 900-1500 mg daily (300-500 mg three times daily before meals
  8. Monk Fruit Extract (Mogroside V): 150-250 mg mogrosides daily (as sweetener replacement)
  9. Stevia Extract (Stevioside): 750-1500 mg daily (250-500 mg three times as sweetener replacement)

All can be taken once daily with food. Excellent safety: No significant interactions. Minimal side effects.

To achieve even greater benefits, fast overnight 16 hours 2-3 days per week.
The author gives his routine implementation of the 9 ingredient protocol as well as this cost comparison:
  • Nine-supplement protocol: ~$80-120 per month (preventive intervention achieving 93% cancer risk reduction)​
  • Single chemotherapy cycle: $10,000-30,000 (palliative intervention with modest survival benefit)​

For more: