A groundbreaking new analysis has uncovered evidence that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA shots may have contained bacterial DNA fragments with dangerous immune-activating signatures.
The discovery is raising urgent questions about how regulators ever allowed the injections to reach the public.
The findings were revealed in a preprint published by molecular biologist Kevin McKernan.
McKernan used advanced Oxford Nanopore sequencing technology to analyze a Pfizer vaccine lot (FL8095).
His results revealed:
Bacterial-style DNA methylation marks (m6A), a fingerprint of contamination from E. coli–derived DNA.
Evidence of incomplete linearization, meaning the DNA used to manufacture the shots may not have been fully processed, leaving behind problematic fragments.
Signals that the contamination could, in theory, trigger powerful immune responses, potentially leading to harmful side effects.
These findings raise serious questions about the integrity of the health regulatory process during the declared COVID-19 pandemic. (See link for article)
_______________
**Comment**
Science show such fragments can set off inflammation and cytokine storms.
Hatfill emphasized that he did not believe Kennedy himself had ordered the firing, instead pointing to a small inner circle he described as acting independently of the Secretary’s agenda. He said they have blocked multiple pandemic preparedness and vaccine reform initiatives.
In the interview, both Hatfill and Gray Delany, former Director of MAHA Implementation state their firings coincided with efforts to expose the catastrophic harms of mRNA vaccine technology and the ongoing concealment of safety data within U.S. health agencies. Source
Dr. Steven Hatfill — one of the few men of integrity within HHS — has been fired in what he describes as “a coup to overthrow Mr. Kennedy,” led by Chief of Staff Matt Buckham.
Dr. Hatfill, a highly respected biosecurity expert whose guidance helped inform Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s decision to terminate $500 million in mRNA research contracts, was likely targeted for standing up for the American people against the dangerous transnational Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex.
According to The New York Times, Hatfill refused to resign when pressured by Buckham, who allegedly told him the department “wanted to go in a different direction.” Instead, Hatfill demanded that HHS fire him outright.
The Department justified the firing by claiming Hatfill “misrepresented himself” as Chief Medical Officer — a claim Hatfill refuted by producing official HHS business cards carrying that exact title.
Dr. Hatfill has been one of the few federal insiders openly confronting the immense dangers of mRNA technology and actually trying to Make America Healthy Again. (See link for article)
_______________
**Comment**
Dr. Hatfill is counting the cost for standing for what is right.
I’m happy to report that everything posted on this website on the dystopian COVID chapter aligns with what Dr. Hatfill says in this interview. I am indebted to doctors and researchers who shared prolifically on Linkedin early on. Many of these experts are retired or not employed by the government and could speak freely. Unfortunately, one by one, Linked in kicked these truth-tellers off the platform until one day I too was ‘disappeared.’
This frightening injection for cows and scary additives for their food is to curb the methane they produce. All for profit of course – Gates’ profit. Just when we hoped Gates would disappear from our sight, he’s back with more schemes for our food. He just had a secret meeting with President Trump and then came back two weeks later for another. Something monstrous is definitely brewing in the kitchen.
Gates has his fingers in so many pies it’s hard to keep them all straight. The many pies include, but aren’t limited to:
Florida Governor Slams Proposal to Engineer Meat Allergies in Humans to ‘Save the Planet’
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis criticized a bioethicist’s video suggesting humans could be engineered to develop a red meat allergy, linking the idea to the World Economic Forum and World Health Organization. “Genetically engineering humans to become allergic to meat because some elites think people eat ‘too much’ of it is insane,” DeSantis wrote.
October 20, 2025This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis last week publicly rejected the notion that humans could be engineered to develop a red meat allergy as a way to curb meat consumption and protect the environment — an idea he linked to the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO).
On X, DeSantis posted a 2016 video of Matthew Liao, a professor of bioethics at New York University and director of its Center for Bioethics. Liao tells his audience that ticks could be used to spread allergies that make humans unable to tolerate red meat — an idea that has been repeated by other bioethicists.
“People eat too much meat. And if they were to cut down on their consumption of meat, then it would actually really help the planet,” Liao said in the video. “There’s this thing called the lone star tick, where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat. So, that’s something we can do through human engineering.”
DeSantis said Liao’s statements are “an example of why entities like the WEF and WHO are persona non grata” in Florida.
“Genetically engineering humans to become allergic to meat because some elites think people eat ‘too much’ of it is insane,” DeSantis wrote.
Tim Hinchliffe, editor of The Sociable, said that while Liao’s comments were not new — the video is from an almost 10-year-old talk at the World Science Festival — DeSantis’ remarks were significant.
“Although he’s slow to the game, at least he’s noticing,” Hinchliffe said.
Liao “has been talking about making people allergic to meat for over a decade, going back to his TED Talk 12 years ago, in 2013,” Hinchliffe said.
During that talk, Liao said, “Just as some people are naturally intolerant to milk or crayfish, like myself, we could artificially induce mild intolerance to meat by stimulating our immune system against common bovine proteins.”
“This isn’t dietary advice — it’s social engineering,” Ji said. “Unelected global organizations have no business dictating what free people eat, especially when they’re demonizing traditional foods that have sustained human health for millennia.”
Kendall Mackintosh, a board-certified nutrition specialist, said such claims aren’t “just about climate,” but are also centered around “control and consolidation.”
“Real, regenerative farmingsupports independence and local economies. Centralizing food systems through synthetic or lab-grown products benefits corporations, not families,” Mackintosh said.
Ji agreed. He said such proposals are indicative of “the merger of biotechnology and behavioral control.” He added:
“The war on meat has never been about climate. It’s about control — consolidating food production under centralized, patented, technology-dependent systems.
“Meat represents everything the global technocracy fears: decentralized production, nutritional independence and cultural traditions that resist standardization. When people can raise their own food, they’re harder to control. The WEF understands this perfectly.”
Recent paper suggests spreading meat allergy to humans is a moral obligation
A paper published earlier this month in the journal Bioethics proposed using the lone star tick to spread alpha-gal syndrome (AGS), “a condition whose only effect is the creation of a severe but nonfatal red meat allergy.”
In the paper, Western Michigan University bioethics professors Parker Crutchfield, Ph.D., and Blake Hereth, Ph.D., argued that “if eating meat is morally impermissible, then efforts to prevent the spread of tickborne AGS are also morally impermissible.”
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), when it bites, the lone star tick transmits the alpha-gal sugar molecule into the human bloodstream, leading to a red meat allergy. Consuming red meat after being infected could result in life-threatening anaphylaxis.
The paper’s authors present what they called the “Convergence Argument.” If a specific action “prevents the world from becoming a significantly worse place, doesn’t violate anyone’s rights, and promotes virtuous action or character,” then it becomes a moral obligation to perform this action, they said.
According to the authors, the use of AGS to spread a red meat allergy to humans meets these criteria. However, they acknowledged ethical obstacles: few people would likely volunteer for the tick bite, and forcing it on people would raise questions of bodily autonomy and freedom.
The authors told The College Fix in an August email that their paper does not constitute an endorsement of spreading AGS to humans, but offers a hypothetical framework raising ethical and philosophical questions.
Mackintosh questioned this denial. “Calling it a ‘thought experiment’ doesn’t make it any less disturbing. The idea that inducing an allergy or harming human health could somehow serve a moral purpose shows just how far detached some parts of academia have become from basic human ethics,” she said.
“The fact that this was even published tells you how normalized these anti-human, anti-food narratives are becoming under the guise of ‘ethics,’” Mackintosh added.
Ji said the paper raises questions about bodily autonomy.
“This is about far more than food, it’s about whether human beings retain sovereignty over their own bodies, or whether that sovereignty can be overridden by those who believe they know better. The answer to that question will determine whether we remain free,” he said.
Mackintosh questioned the authors’ claim that lone star tick bites “only” lead to AGS.
AGS “can cause severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, and can completely alter someone’s diet and quality of life,” Mackintosh said. “The suggestion of using ticks or any biological vector to intentionally spread an allergy is beyond unethical. It’s dangerous, unpredictable and medically reckless.”
A 2023 CDC report said AGS cases were on the rise in the U.S.
DeSantis previously outlawed sale of lab-grown meat in Florida
While DeSantis didn’t directly address the paper or AGS in his X posts, he has consistently spoken out against efforts to shift people away from red meat and toward alternatives such as lab-grown meat and insects.
Last year, DeSantis signed legislation prohibiting the sale of lab-grown meat in Florida. According to a press release, the law aims “to stop the World Economic Forum’s goal of forcing the world to eat lab-grown meat and insects,” which a 2021 WEF article characterized as an “overlooked” source of protein.”
“Florida is fighting back against the global elite’s plan to force the world to eat meat grown in a petri dish or bugs to achieve their authoritarian goals,” DeSantis said at the time.
Joseph Sansone, Ph.D., a psychotherapist who sued DeSantis and Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to prohibit mRNA vaccines in Florida, said that while he has been “litigating against DeSantis for over a year and a half to stop mRNA injections,” he agrees with DeSantis on this issue.
“DeSantis is calling out something that many Americans feel — they don’t want global organizations or unelected bodies deciding what they can or can’t eat,” Sansone said.
Mackintosh said lab-grown meat raises questions about potential health risks.
“There are questions about contamination risks, the use of antibiotics or growth media, nutrient content, and even the true environmental impact once scaled up. It’s also ultra-processed — far from the whole, nutrient-dense foods our bodies were designed to thrive on,” she said.
“Many lab-grown meat companies are using immortalized cell lines — cells that are capable of continuously dividing and growing in a manner disturbingly similar to cancer cells,” Ji said. There is a “complete absence of long-term safety studies” for such products.
Scientists have raised similar concerns about human consumption of insects. The exoskeletons of many insects contain chitin, a natural material that can trigger an allergic reaction in humans. Some studies suggest that humans cannot digest chitin, while other studies suggest humans “don’t digest it well.”
WEF suggests consuming alternative meats will ‘save the planet’
In a 2019 video, the WEF suggested that in the not-too-distant future, humans would be allowed to consume only “one beef burger, two portions of fish and one or two eggs per week” to “save the planet.”
That year, the WEF published a white paper calling for “a transformation in the global system for protein provision” to meet climate-related targets.
Mackintosh said corporate interests are behind the push for “alternative” meats.
“The biggest winners in the lab-grown meat push are large food conglomerates, biotech companies and venture capital investors who own the patents and production technology. Small farmers and ranchers — the backbone of our food system — lose. This is about creating dependence, not sustainability,” she said.
Ji agreed. “Follow the money. Biotech corporations and their investors stand to profit massively from patents and market control,” he said.
Liao suggested chemically inducing empathy, making kids smaller
DeSantis and others have suggested a link between Liao and the WEF, including a claim that Liao’s 2012 co-authored paper, “Human Engineering and Climate Change,” which argued that “human engineering deserves further consideration in the debate about climate change,” was the subject of a discussion at the WEF’s 2021 annual meeting.
Hinchliffe noted that the WEF “does have a habit of scrubbing what it considers to be negative publicity from its website.” However, whether or not there is a direct connection between Liao and the WEF, Liao “is definitely aligned” with WEF policies, he said.
“Academic papers proposing disease vectors to manipulate behavior aren’t harmless philosophy — they’re rehearsals. They move the Overton window, normalize the abnormal and provide intellectual scaffolding for future atrocities. The field of bioethics has become less about protecting human dignity and more about rationalizing its violation.”
Eversource, National Grid and others are rolling out their smart grids with no informed consent.
The science is very clear that the radiation pulsated 24×7 from these digital utility meters is a neurotoxin, carcinogen, causes infertility and more.
Join Cece Doucette and Building Biologist Ken Gartner to learn the science, symptoms, medical recommendations, and what you can do to protect your home, loved ones and pets from this man-made toxin!
“Smart” meters for electric, solar, water, gas and propane are being installed everywhere, so please share this invitation widely.
Children, pregnant women, the elderly and anyone with an existing health compromise often experience symptoms first, but many previously healthy ratepayers develop EMR Syndrome after smart meters are installed.
Lyme disease can cause serious and lasting impairments that make it impossible to work full-time.
Yet, because symptoms of Lyme disease are typically subjective, or self-reported, insurance companies tend to question the legitimacy of Lyme-related claims.
Oftentimes, disability insurance companies will deny long term disability (LTD) claims because there is no standard testing to prove impairment caused by ongoing symptoms.
If you are unable to work due to the ongoing impact of Lyme disease and your doctors agree you should stop working, you may be eligible for LTD insurance benefits.
Disability insurance coverage provided by an employer is usually governed by a federal law called ERISA. This law has specific requirements for submitting a short-term and long-term claim and appealing a denied claim.
It is important to obtain a copy of the short-term and long-term disability insurance policies from your employer to understand what is necessary for the claim or appeal and by when it is due. Deadlines are very strict in ERISA disability claims. A missed deadline could prevent you from pursuing the claim further.
Symptoms
Common symptoms and complications of Lyme disease that prevent people from working may include:
Chronic fatigue
Severe joint or muscle pain
Cognitive issues like memory loss or “brain fog”
Vision problems
Sleep disturbances
Mood changes, including anxiety and depression
When symptoms last for an extended period, they can interfere with your ability to perform your job duties consistently. It is at that point you may need to look into your disability insurance coverage through work or even individually (if you took out a disability insurance policy previously).
Challenges when filing for LTD benefits
Insurance companies are notoriously skeptical of Lyme disease disability claims, especially if:
Your symptoms are self-reported, such as chronic fatigue, pain, or cognitive impairments.
You do not have a confirmed positive Lyme test.
You are not treating with an infectious disease specialist or a specialist in Lyme Disease.
Your medical records do not clearly demonstrate your restrictions and limitations.
One of the most important aspects of a disability insurance claim, especially for a condition like Lyme disease, is to ensure you are being treated regularly by doctors, and that your doctors are supportive of your disability.
You will need their support when completing paperwork and throughout the duration of your LTD claim and benefit payments. It is important they also maintain detailed medical records of your ongoing symptoms, their observations of pain or fatigue or brain fog, and any abnormal exam findings.
Disability insurance companies will scrutinize your medical records looking for inconsistencies or lack of detail as to how your symptoms impact your functionality. Some commons bases for long term disability claim denials include:
Claiming Your Symptoms Are “Subjective” – Disability insurers argue issues like fatigue or brain fog can’t be proven with standard tests.
Doubting the Diagnosis – Denials are common when no antibody testing confirms Lyme disease.
Discrediting Your Doctors – Disability insurers rely on their own consultants to undermine your treating physicians.
Minimizing Your Limitations – Disability insurers point to basic daily tasks (cooking, driving) or surveillance footage to argue you can still work.
What you will need to support your claim
Getting approved for LTD benefits for Lyme disease requires strong, consistent medical and non-medical evidence that corroborates your reported symptoms and bolsters your credibility. The following is a brief list of things you may want to gather as part of your LTD claim or appeal:
Thorough Medical Documentation – Ensure your providers document your diagnosis, testing, and daily impact of symptoms.
Neuropsychological Testing – Objective evidence of memory, concentration, or cognitive issues.
Symptom Log – Daily tracking showing fluctuation, triggers, and impact on functioning.
Personal and 3rd party statements – Your own account plus input from family/friends describing struggles and changes.
Fighting for long term disability insurance benefits due to Lyme disease can be frustrating, but there is hope. With strong support from your treating providers, detailed medical records, and evidence demonstrating your restrictions and limitations, disability insurance companies have approved these claims. If you have questions or concerns about your claim, you should reach out to a disability insurance attorney who can guide you on how best to handle your claim.
Edward Dabdoub is the founder and managing partner of the Dabdoub Law Firm, a national practice that specializes in long-term disability insurance claims.
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 