Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

Co-Infections Uncovered in One-Fifth of Covid-19 Samples

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/86007?xid=nl_popmed_2020-

Co-Infections Uncovered in One-Fifth of COVID-19 Samples

— Testing for other respiratory illnesses may not rule out COVID-19 — and vice versa
A computer rendering of various micro organisms as seen under a microscope
Just because a patient tests positive for the COVID-19 coronavirus doesn’t mean that other pathogens aren’t at work too, researchers found.

In a small sample in Northern California, 20.7% of respiratory specimens positive for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, were also positive for one or more additional pathogens, reported James Quinn, MD, of Stanford University School of Medicine in Stanford, California, and colleagues, writing in a research letter in JAMA.

They noted early reports from China that suggested potential co-infection with other respiratory pathogens was “rare,” though CDC suggested testing for other respiratory pathogens in patients with suspected COVID-19, adding “evidence of another infection could aid the evaluation of patients with potential COVID-19 in the absence of widely available rapid testing for SARS-CoV-2.”

Quinn and colleagues examined 1,217 nasopharyngeal specimens from symptomatic patients reporting, for example, cough, fever, and shortness of breath, and found 9.5% were positive for SARS-CoV-2, with 24 of those testing positive for additional pathogens, such as influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, and non-SARS-CoV-2 Coronaviridae.

In addition, patients with co-infections did not differ significantly in age (mean age 47) versus those infected with SARS-CoV-2 only (mean age 51).

The most common co-infections were

  • rhinovirus/enterovirus (7%)
  • respiratory syncytial virus (5%)
  • non-SARS-CoV-2 Coronaviridae (4%)

“These results suggest higher rates of co-infection between SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens than previously reported,” Quinn and colleagues wrote.

“The presence of a non-SARS-CoV-2 pathogen may not provide reassurance that a patient does not also have SARS-CoV-2.”

While they noted their results were limited to a single region in California, as well as their limited sample size, they concluded routine testing for non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory pathogens “is unlikely to provide clinical benefit unless a positive result would change disease management” (for example, neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza patients) during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Disclosures:

The authors disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Lyme Patients Speak Out on Having COVID-19

https://www.lymedisease.org/roth-horowitz-covid19/

06 APR 2020
By  Dorothy Kupcha Leland
__________________________
For another Chronic Lyme patient who had COVID-19:

The first patient to speak is Representative Karen Whitsett who credits President Trump’s promotion of a malaria drug, hydroxychloroquine, with her recovery from coronavirus. Other COVID-19 survivors also speak after her at the White House. During their informal discussions, Rep. Whitsett, who had a severe case of  COVID-19, brought up her chronic Lyme disease as an underlying condition. Throughout the 41-minute meeting, President Trump highlighted how serious and devastating Lyme disease is, stating that it “can kill you.”

__________________________

Although the following patient DID NOT have COVID-19, her Lyme disease herxes made her think she might have had it.

Is it COVID-19 or a Lyme disease herx? One woman’s story.

Swedish Epidemiologist: Lockdowns Are Not Evidence Based

 Approx. 8 Min, By UnHerd

Why Lockdowns Are The Wrong Policy

Swedish Expert – Professor Johan Giesecke
Professor Johan Giesecke, one of the world’s most senior epidemiologists, advisor to the Swedish Government (he hired Anders Tegnell who is currently directing Swedish strategy), the first Chief Scientist of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, and an advisor to the director general of the WHO, lays out with typically Swedish bluntness why he thinks: 
UK policy on lockdown and other European countries are not evidence-based
The correct policy is to protect the old and the frail onlyThis will eventually lead to herd immunity as a “by-product”.
  • The flattening of the curve is due to the most vulnerable dying first as much as the lockdown

This 8 minute extract is from the longer version (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfN2J…).

Johan Giesecke says that this conversation (about criticisms of the Swedish model) should happen one year from now.  Other countries are merely dodging the virus. Please see:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/09/epidemiologist-coronavirus-could-be-exterminated-if-lockdowns-lifted/

They can’t escape it for ever. Johan Giesecke has three criticisms of Western scientists: 

  • they are not taking an evidence-based approach 
  • Neil Ferguson’s model is terrible + not even peer reviewed 
  • mortality from the virus is much, much lower than 2%

Johan believes that in the end deaths in most options will be very similar but the damage done to societies by lockdowns would be in some cases irreversible. See http://swarnabharat.in/pandemic for a group in India’s evidence-based and risk-based approach that is consistent also with liberty and human rights.

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/19/revealed-basic-math-error-likely-cause-of-global-coronavirus-panic/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/30/how-deadly-is-the-coronavirus-its-still-far-from-clear-everything-is-set-up-to-show-high-numbers/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/27/a-fiasco-in-the-making-as-the-coronavirus-pandemic-takes-hold-we-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/11/hospitals-paid-extra-to-list-patients-as-covid19-3x-as-much-if-the-patient-is-on-a-ventilator/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/04/experts-and-models-can-they-show-us-their-math/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/13/seven-silver-linings-of-the-pandemic-the-grand-farce-of-social-distancing/

Facebook ‘Fact Checker’ Worked At Wuhan Biolab; Ruled Out Virus-Leak While ‘Debunking’ Articles

https://www.zerohedge.com/health/conflict-interest-facebook-fact-checker-worked-wuhan-biolab-ruled-out-virus-leak-while

Facebook ‘Fact Checker’ Worked At Wuhan Biolab; Ruled Out Virus-Leak While ‘Debunking’ Articles

A Facebook fact checker who has ‘debunked’ articles suggesting that COVID-19 may have leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) has a giant conflict of interest; she worked at the institute– which is now suspected of accidentally leaking the hyper-virulent virus which has killed over 130,000 people and cast the global economy into chaos.

Danielle Anderson, who works at Duke University’s NUS Medical School lab in Singapore, also contributes to Science Feedback – which Facebook has been using to slap “False Information” labels on articles claiming that COVID-19 may have originated at the Wuhan institute – where Anderson worked with bat coronavirus.

A quick search of Anderson’s publications reveals no fewer than nine collaborations with Dr. Peng Zhou – a Wuhan scientist experimenting on bat coronavirus (the mention of whom may result in a Twitter ban). (See link for article)

__________________

 

http://

Video by Truth in Media

______________________

**Comment**

Important quote:

Anderson further peddled the now-debunked wet-market theory in a paper she co-wrote in The Lancet
The plot thickens daily.

Peaceful Protest – Sunday WI State Capital

Peaceful Protest This Sunday – Protesting Stay At Home Order

  • April 19, 2020
  • Wisconsin State Capitol
  • 12:00-2:00pm

Meet on the corner of Pinckney and Main Streets, then take a peaceful walk around the Capitol Building.

The recommended social distance of 6 feet from one another will be followed. But we will also maintain our civil liberties.

There will be suggestions for ensuring your walk remains as respectful, peaceful, and valuable as possible. Details to follow.

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/06/wheres-the-evidence-supporting-the-drastic-measures-against-covid-19/