Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

We Will Never Forget: ‘Pandemic” Was Used To Frighten and Control Us

‘https://dailysceptic.org/2024/10/10/no-we-will-never-forget-what-you-did-to-us-in-covid/

No, We Will Never Forget What You Did to Us in Covid

In a recent piece in the New York Times, Dr. Rachel Bedard – who specialises in “medicine and criminal justice” – said the world needs to move on from the whole Covid catastrophe, the pandemic response, the wholesale destruction of liberties.

In complaining about the possibility that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will be appointed by a – horrors! – potential Donald Trump administration, she had this to say:

The COVID-19 pandemic was a divisive crisis for Americans. I worry that appointing Mr. Kennedy to a top health job would entrench the maddening, counterproductive, personality-driven dynamics that have dominated the politics of health and medicine for the first half of this decade, especially post-Covid. …

The future will surely bring both predictable and unforeseen public health crises that will require cool, experienced, nonpartisan leadership. Should Mr. Kennedy be appointed to the federal Government, he is unlikely to use his power to turn down the temperature. We should learn from what the pandemic revealed about our culture’s deep divisions. If Mr. Kennedy is in the administration, I fear we never will.

Arrogance aside, Bedard’s opinion piece screams enforced forgetfulness. While she may claim her position is about being able to “learn” from the pandemic, her statements belie that.

Her version of learning is about learning how to trust the public health complex that lied to the world for four – and counting – years about the dangers, origins and potential treatments for Covid.

Bedard does admit that much politics was played and that maybe kinda sorta the pronouncements from the likes of Anthony Fauci were too “prescriptive” rather than “persuasive”, which is the best way to handle discussions in the midst of any public health crisis.

She says RFK Jr.’s pronouncements are about power rather the necessary “nuance” needed and he is therefore unfit for office.

One assumes one can replace “nuance” with “I was just following orders”, but, either way, Bedard whitewashes fault and then – for purely pejorative reasons – goes into a tangent about raw milk.  (See link for article)

______________

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/sen-ron-johnson-pandemic-was-used#media-

Sen. Ron Johnson: Pandemic Was Used to Frighten and Control the Public on a Global Scale

“Fortunately, what happened during the pandemic opened the eyes of untold numbers of people around the world…”

Source: TruthAboutCOVID

Sen. Ron Johnson: “[The Coronavirus “pandemic”] was used to frighten and control the public on a global scale.”

“The result was a stunning loss of life and freedom for individuals, trillions of dollars of economic devastation, but billions of dollars of profit—and the accumulation of enormous power—for those in control.”

“Fortunately, what happened during the pandemic opened the eyes of untold numbers of people around the world to the corruption and capture of government agencies, the media, medical journals and the medical establishment, by large corporate interests.”

“Now that our eyes have been opened to that reality, it is impossible to ignore that the same dynamic has occurred throughout governments and industries worldwide.” ~ Senator Ron Johnson, Wisconsin

Full Video: “American Health and Nutrition: A Second Opinion: https://rumble.com/v5fy7bv-american-health-and-nutrition-a-second-opinion.html

_______________

**Comment**

The top article points out that Bedard uses a common tactic by intentionally lumping various types of ‘officially designated-crazy people’ together and casting a divisive light upon them.  You know – those people.  The crazy people who are out of touch.

This tactic is deployed to stop all argument, debate, and discussion and it’s quite effective for many people.

Bedard isn’t the first to use this tactic or to ask the world to simply have selective amnesia for one of the most unbelievable times of tyranny and censorship in current U.S. history.  Some health ‘experts’ and Brown University economist Emily Oster have also asked for amnesty because according to her, “everyone tried their best, no one did anything intentionally bad, we now know better, we’re not bad people, we didn’t really know”.

However, ‘mistakes were not made.’

There is much, much proof that the ‘pandemic’ was planned with purpose. An elite group of people at Event 201 planned for this loss of freedom and medical apartheid, and medical ‘experts’ allowed myths to pervade for years despite all known science – which caused untold numbers to die or suffer with life-long health issues.

The article rightly points out the massive degradation of education, the economy, children’s social skills, public trust in institutions, civil liberties, relationships due to massive polarization, health, careers due to censorship and persecution, and direct hardships caused by ‘vaccine’ mandates, leaving thousands maimed or dead.

Further, the fast-tracked COVID shots were not tested for the very things they were told to have and are filled with toxic contaminants that are known to cause human disease.  We were lied to repeatedly, and continue to be lied to.

The truth is, COVID was a massive scandal that we will perhaps never know the entire truth about.

Meanwhile Oster not only kept her job, she became famous.  Bureaucrats, multinational companies, putative experts, the national security-industrial complex, and the mindless media and internet scolds also did quite well.

It was not good for people. ~ Thomas Buckley, former Mayor of Lake Elsinore, CA and former newspaper reporter.

The ‘Remdesivir Papers’: NIH COVID Panel Learned Zilch & 12 Policies Must Be Changed For Health Freedom

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/remdesivir-papers-drug-military-members-941-deaths/?

‘Remdesivir Papers’ Allege Controversial Drug Used to Treat Service Members Led to 601 Deaths

A military whistleblower released a series of documents revealing that the military began “liberally” administering remdesivir to service members who were suspected of having COVID-19 — months before the FDA approved the drug.

remdesivir bottle and stack of files

A military whistleblower released a series of documents revealing 601 deaths of military service members and a high rate of serious adverse events in clinical trials involving remdesivir, an antiviral commonly administered to COVID-19 patients during the pandemic.

According to “The Remdesivir Papers,” some clinical trials were improperly run. In the case of at least one study, results were never made public. The whistleblower also alleged a widespread lack of informed consent for trial participants.

“Data derived from the Department of Defense [DOD] Joint Trauma System … by a military whistleblower offers a stark contrast to results of multiple clinical trials involving the liberal usage of remdesivir in military treatment facilities and other civilian facilities, as well as its potential contribution to, at minimum, hundreds of untimely deaths,” the documents state.

Yet according to the documents, the military began “liberally” administering remdesivir to service members who were suspected of having COVID-19 — months before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the drug.

The whistleblower, known by the pseudonym Daniel LeMay, shared the documents with investigative journalist J.M. Phelps, who published them last week in The Gateway Pundit.

In interviews with The Defender, LeMay and Phelps discussed the documents and their significance.  (See link for article)

Important excerpt:

Former victims of the COVID-19 hospital protocols, which included administration of remdesivir, and advocates for those victims welcomed the documents’ release.

________________

**Comment**

This needs to go public. Public officials need to be held to account for the fraudulent ‘trials’ of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine in order to preclude their use, making remdesivir the standard of care despite the obvious data showing that it kills people.  More whistleblowers need to come forward.

Gulick et al, published a “lessons learned” paper in Annals of Internal Medicine and missed the point entirely regarding ivermectin which exceeded all other drugs. Doctors and patients are finding success with ivermectin in combination with other nutraceuticals and drugs.  To make matters worse, the NIH guidelines advised against using ivermectin, which impeded doctors on the front line who found it effective and a part of community standard of care.

I highly recommend reading COVID ‘vaccine’ science catching up with ‘conspiracy theorists.’  Important excerpt:

Of course, while the science is starting to catch up, and the lawsuits are continuing apace (source), we’re still being told by our governments and mainstream media to roll up our sleeves, even those of us as young as 6 months. Source and source.

Okay then.

I’m with Dr. Vinay Prasad who once again candidly reiterates ‘mistakes were not made,’ and there should be no amnesty for COVID tyrants who are still lying.

Not only are they still lying, untold numbers of doctors have been persecuted by The Machine for simply doing their jobs and treating people.  Many lost their medical licenses and can no longer practice medicine.  This too has not been admitted or rectified by The Establishment.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/12-policies-need-change-true-health-freedom/?

These 12 Policies Need to Change If We Want True Health Freedom

In a free and moral society, health freedom is not simply a convenience — it’s an imperative.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
statue of liberty and hand holding stethoscope

As a requirement for discussing and appreciating the imperative of health freedom in the U.S., we must first define what is meant by health freedom.

A simple definition is the right of every American to decide what medical interventions to put into or onto one’s body, the right to access and use the medical and healing modalities of one’s choice, the right to maintain one’s health according to one’s conscience and the right to live free of involuntary medication be it via the food supply, the water supply or something airborne.

In a free and moral society, health freedom is not simply a convenience; it’s an imperative.

In this vein, in the event of injury or illness, all Americans must possess the absolute right to choose what medical interventions and treatments to accept and what medical or healing modalities to utilize in order to address illness or injury; Americans must be free to choose how to maintain their health whether that be through nutrition, supplements, herbs, drugs or a myriad of healing modalities; Americans must have access to truthful information regarding how the seeds for plants and animal feed and the food in our food supply has been grown or developed, medicated, processed and packaged; and Americans have the right to exist in a society free of water and airborne medications, insect vectors and chemicals.

Health freedom can only exist in a free and moral society that values each and every member of that society. This prerequisite thus excludes medical mandates of any kind. It is immoral to force another individual to risk their life for the theoretical benefit of another.

Moreover, the government does not have the moral authority or power to dictate what medical products any American puts into or on his or her body. If anyone in government does possess that power, then no American is truly free, nor does he or she possess any meaningful right whatsoever — Americans are merely chattel.

In order to create a society based on true health freedom, the following policy shifts should be implemented, as a first step. There are many more changes that should be implemented as well, but these proposals would address some of the most glaring, pernicious anti-liberty and anti-health aspects of our system as it exists today:

1. Ban all medical mandates

The Declaration of Independence states, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Medical mandates are prima facie violations of our founding documents.

Health freedom demands prior voluntary informed consent before a medical treatment or intervention is administered. Medical mandates are thus, by definition, antithetical to voluntary consent and therefore must be prohibited in a free and moral society.

No single individual in government knows the medical history of any American, knows what is best for Americans, or has to live with the repercussions of any choices made by Americans, thus, medical mandates are never justified in any circumstance.

2. Repeal the Bayh-Dole Act

“The Bayh-Dole Act, formerly known as the Patent and Trademark Act Amendments, is a federal law enacted in 1980 that enables universities, nonprofit research institutions and small businesses to own, patent and commercialize inventions developed under federally funded research programs within their organizations.”

Under this program, government scientists may receive up to $150,000 per year on their patents.

In theory, Bayh-Dole incentivizes bright scientists to seek employment at federal health agencies rather than entering more lucrative private industry by allowing these taxpayer-funded scientists and other individuals and entities to retain the patent rights to intellectual property developed during their taxpayer-funded research and development activities.

In practice, this Act forever realigned the interests of taxpayer-funded scientists away from the American people and toward their own interests and profits and the profits of the private industries with which they collaborate.

Dr. Anthony Fauci and his team at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases infamously owned half of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine patent which incentivized the misguided COVID-19-era policies leading to a colossal violation of the rights of Americans demonstrating the perverse incentives created by Bayh-Dole and the necessity of repealing the act.

3. Repeal the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) of 1992

“The Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) was created by Congress in 1992 and authorizes FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] to collect user fees from persons that submit certain human drug applications for review or that are named in approved applications as the sponsor of certain prescription drug products. Since the passage of PDUFA, user fees have played an important role in expediting the drug review and approval process.”

In 2022 alone, the pharmaceutical industry paid $2.9 billion in user fees amounting to 46% of the FDA’s entire budget including $1.4 billion or 66% for their drug approvers’ salaries and $197 million or 43% of the biologics (vaccines) program budget.

As a direct consequence of PDUFA, the FDA has a vested interest aligned with the profits and success of the pharmaceutical industry rather than the health and well-being of the American people.

4. Repeal the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) which authorizes the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to issue a PREP Act declaration.

“The declaration provides immunity from liability (except for willful misconduct) for claims:

    • of loss caused, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from administration or use of countermeasures to diseases, threats and conditions
    • determined by the Secretary to constitute a present, or credible risk of a future public health emergency
    • to entities and individuals involved in the development, manufacture, testing, distribution, administration, and use of such countermeasures

“A PREP Act declaration is specifically for the purpose of providing immunity from liability, and is different from, and not dependent on, other emergency declarations.”

The PREP Act desecrates the ethical principle of informed consent by protecting individuals from liability even when they expressly act contrary to patients’ wishes and instructions and must be repealed.

5. Repeal the Affordable Care Act

The Affordable Care Act anchors Americans to the pharmaceutical and drug-based medical paradigm even though a majority of Americans used at least one form of “alternative” medicine in 2021 and spent $30.6 billion in out-of-pocket expenses for those holistic medicine services in 2023 according to Statista.

Instead, implement a health savings program that permits Americans to access the health and medical modalities of their choice which in turn would foster more competition and reduce the exorbitant healthcare costs in the U.S. by breaking the extant monopolies held by the medical and insurance industries.

6. Repeal the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA)

NCVIA shields vaccine makers from liability (except for willful misconduct), creating a perverse incentive to industry to develop a never-ending stream of vaccines which are then mandated by the states.

Further, the NCVIA protects industry and vaccine programs by creating a separate administrative federal court structure lacking due process and discovery, managed by “Special Masters” instead of judges, all in violation of the constitutionally protected right to due process.

While NCVIA contains other provisions designed to protect American families and ensure the safety of the national vaccine supply, Congress is not conducting proper oversight and the promises made in 1986 at the time of the Act’s passage have not been upheld.

As such, Americans who have been injured or killed by vaccines are left with astronomical medical bills and to fend for themselves.

7. Prohibit private donations to government entities

Prohibit private individuals, foundations, corporations, contractors and any other person or entity from donating or otherwise giving money to any agency or entity of the federal government.

The FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) accept money from private actors such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Pfizer, thus skewing the interests of the agency in favor of these private actors and away from the American public.

Gates has collaborated with the FDA and the CDC Foundation takes money from the pharmaceutical industry whose products the CDC is responsible for monitoring for safety.

8. Cooling-off period for senior federal employees

Enact a five-year cooling-off period before which agency leadership, deputies and other key officials may depart federal agencies in order to enter the companies they regulate in the private sector.

9. Prevent conflicts of interest

Eliminate conflict-of-interest waivers so that no person serving on a health agency committee, board or other regulatory entity may have a conflict of interest. Disclosure of conflicts of interest is insufficient to ensure the agencies pursue the interests of the American people. Individuals with financial or ideological conflicts of interest should not serve as decision-makers in any capacity.

10. Prohibit government grants to nonprofits

Prohibit the government from allocating taxpayer dollars to nonprofits. Nonprofits exists to serve the public interests and should be funded directly by American citizens. If a nonprofit has a worthwhile mission, the public will gladly support it.

Government exists to protect our rights and should not be in the business of picking winners and losers nor should it be using third parties to pursue policies outside the reach and review of the public.

11. Ban water fluoridation

While water fluoridation programs are widespread, they are not only dangerous from a health standpoint, they are forced medication in violation of the ethical principle of informed consent.

Research comparing the health outcomes and IQs of communities that do and do not fluoridate their water supply reveals that children in the fluoridated water communities have reduced IQs and therefore inferior prospects in life. Other research has documented the health hazards of fluoride, an industrial waste product.

In addition, as fluoride is added to municipal water supplies, residents of those communities have no way to opt out and therefore are subjected to involuntary forced medication. No one should be forced to consume drugged water in order to maintain a biological necessity.

12. Ban the release of genetically modified insects

Two tenets of good health are abundant exposure to sunshine and fresh air; however, in some states, the state governments have collaborated with private businesses to release genetically modified mosquitoes into communities.

While these mosquitoes are often designed to breed with one another and eliminate the dangerous species going forward, the health impacts of humans being bitten by these insects are not well understood. Nor should a person have to risk being bitten by one of these creatures in order to venture outside. This amounts to a form of forced medication absent any form of consent and must be ended.

These recommendations should be understood as necessary first steps to begin correcting the disastrous health policy environment that exists in the U.S. today and to restore true health freedom in the U.S., which would allow all Americans to decide what medical interventions to allow into or onto one’s body, which health and medical modalities to utilize in maintaining their health and the ability to live free of involuntary medication be it via the food supply, the water supply or the air we breathe.

Originally published by Brownstone Institute.

Leslie Manookian is the president and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund. She is a former successful Wall Street business executive. Her career in finance took her from New York to London with Goldman Sachs. She later became director of Alliance Capital in London running their European growth portfolio management and research businesses.

COVID Resistance After Paxlovid Not Found With Ivermectin or HCQ

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2824050?#google_vignette

Abstract

Importance  Previous studies have identified mutations in SARS-CoV-2 strains that confer resistance to nirmatrelvir, yet how often this resistance arises and its association with posttreatment virologic rebound is not well understood.

Objective  To examine the prevalence of emergent antiviral resistance after nirmatrelvir treatment and its association with virologic rebound.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This cohort study enrolled outpatient adults with acute COVID-19 infection from May 2021 to October 2023. Participants were divided into those who received antiviral therapy and those who did not. The study was conducted at a multicenter health care system in Boston, Massachusetts.

Exposure  Treatment regimen, including none, nirmatrelvir (paxlovid), and remdesivir.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was emergent SARS-CoV-2 antiviral resistance, defined as the detection of antiviral resistance mutations, which were not present at baseline, were previously associated with decreased antiviral efficacy, and emerged during or after completion of a participant’s treatment. Next-generation sequencing was used to detect low frequency mutations down to 1% of the total viral population.

Results  Overall, 156 participants (114 female [73.1%]; median [IQR] age, 56 [38-69] years) were included. Compared with 63 untreated individuals, the 79 who received nirmatrelvir were older and more commonly immunosuppressed. After sequencing viral RNA from participants’ anterior nasal swabs, nirmatrelvir resistance mutations were detected in 9 individuals who received nirmatrelvir (11.4%) compared with 2 of those who did not (3.2%) (P = .09). Among the individuals treated with nirmatrelvir, those who were immunosuppressed had the highest frequency of resistance emergence (5 of 22 [22.7%]), significantly greater than untreated individuals (2 of 63 [3.1%]) (P = .01). Similar rates of nirmatrelvir resistance were found in those who had virologic rebound (3 of 23 [13.0%]) vs those who did not (6 of 56 [10.7%]) (P = .86). Most of these mutations (10 of 11 [90.9%]) were detected at low frequencies (<20% of viral population) and reverted to the wild type at subsequent time points. Emerging remdesivir resistance mutations were only detected in immunosuppressed individuals (2 of 14 [14.3%]) but were similarly low frequency and transient. Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data analysis showed no evidence of increased nirmatrelvir resistance in the United States after the authorization of nirmatrelvir.

Conclusions and Relevance  In this cohort study of 156 participants, treatment-emergent nirmatrelvir resistance mutations were commonly detected, especially in individuals who were immunosuppressed. However, these mutations were generally present at low frequencies and were transient in nature, suggesting a low risk for the spread of nirmatrelvir resistance in the community with the current variants and drug usage patterns.

_______________

No such resistence has been seen using ivermectin and HCQ.

http://

Functional Pharmacist Analyzes Ivermectin 2024 Update

Dr. Dan Zatarski explains the mechanism of actions of Ivermectin. He reviews the discovery of ivermectin and helps to illustrate the use of ivermectin compared to penicillin.

https://justusrhope.substack.com/p/topical-ivermectin-and-fenbendazole?

Topical Ivermectin & Fenbendazole for Cancer & Disease

Multiple Case Reports & Before and After Photos

More Bad News On Remdesivir: Some Vials Contain Glass

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/remdesivir-recall-glass-particles-covid-hospital-protocol/?

Glass Particles Prompt Another Recall of Remdesivir, the Controversial Drug Hospitals Used to Treat COVID Patients

An investigation by Gilead, maker of remdesivir, confirmed the presence of glass, according to the company recall notice posted on the FDA website warning the contaminated vials can cause stroke and “even lead to death.”

remdesivir bottles and word "recall"

Pharmaceutical giant Gilead recalled one batch of its COVID-19 antiviral drug Veklury, the brand name for remdesivir, after glass particles were discovered in vials of the drug, Newsweek reported.

A company investigation, prompted by a customer complaint, confirmed the presence of glass, according to the company recall notice posted on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website.

Gilead distributed the batch, identified as Veklury lot No. 47035CFA across the U.S. beginning on July 16. The batch isn’t set to expire until November 2025.

If a product containing glass is injected, it may result in localized swelling or, “the glass particulate can potentially travel, through the blood vessels, to various organs and block blood vessels in the heart, lungs or brain which can cause stroke and even lead to death,” the company warned in the recall notice.

Gilead said it is informing distributors and customers via a letter sent to UPS Next Day Air. The letter advises facilities that have the recalled drug to stop using it and return the vials to the company following the instructions in the letter.

Gilead said it has not received any reports of adverse events related to this lot.

The company didn’t say where the lots were manufactured or by whom and did not respond to The Defender’s request for comment on those questions.  (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

Similarly to the fact COVID tests and gene therapy injections should ALL be recalled and destroyed with a public apology, Remdesivir has been nothing but a major problem since it was rolled out as part of the ‘Fauci Death Protocol.’ 

For more:

Going back to 1997, Donald Rumsfeld chaired the Board of Directors at Gilead and after 2001 he held share packages valued at $5-25 Million. Gilead originally developed Tamiflu. George P Shultz, US Secretary of State also was on the board. He sold stocks at a value of more than $7 million. CA governor’s Pete Wilson’s wife also sat on the board.

“‘I don’t know of any biotech company that’s’ so politically well-connected [as Gilead],‘ Andrew McDonald, of the analyst firm Think Equity Partners, told Fortune.” (Source: “Virus Mania, How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics Making Billion Dollar Profits At Our Expense”)

  • Approximately $70 million in U.S. taxpayer funding began Gilead’s partnership with the U.S. Army, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) to develop remdesivir. Initially for treating Ebola, it failed to show benefit and was shelved. If remdesivir is used to treat COVID-19, Gilead shareholders, not the taxpayers, will profit.

Please remember:

  • There were more than 500 deaths in the first year of remdesivir usage.
  • There have been 20 deaths in 19 years of ivermectin usage.
  • The FDA, spurred by “multiple” reports of ivermectin ‘poisoning,’ lied when it put out a post on it causing “serious harm, seizures, coma, and even death”.  When the author inquired on how many is “multiple,” she was told FOUR.  Yet, the FDA had no trouble approving remdesivir which has caused far more deaths.
  • CDC also bad-mouthed ivermectin and pushed the “calls to the poison control center” narrative. The problem is they gave no data to support this claim.

Agency Capture & Corruption: Conspiracy to Silence Online Dissent & ‘First Do No Harm’

Recently a plethora of articles have exposed how American healthcare is corrupt, broken, and lethal. The US pays the most for worst health outcomes.  There are numerous reasons for this including agency capture and corruption.  

Neither party has made any concerted effort to reign in the corruption of corporate campaign funding and do what is sensible, financially feasible and morally correct to improve Americans’ quality of health and well-being. ~ The Townsend Letter article by Gary Null, PhD and Richard Gale

Proof of this fact is the recent court decision on a more than 70 year controversy over the harms of fluoride in drinking water.  How many have been harmed in this manner over the decades?

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-vast-pharmaceutical-conspiracy-ae0?

The Vast Pharmaceutical Conspiracy to Silence Dissent Online

Millions of dollars were spent to weaponize the public against all of us

A Midwestern Doctor

Story at a Glance:
  • There has been a coordinated campaign to attack and defame anyone who has spoken out against the COVID-19 response. This has primarily been restricted to social media (e.g., getting people deplatformed) but it has also been weaponized in real life (e.g., getting medical licenses revoked).
  • This coordinated campaign was the result of a “non-profit” known as The Public Good Project (PGP), which was actually directly linked to the pharmaceutical industry. The PGP used the industry funding it received to defend industry interests.
  • Vaccine safety advocates were able to get into the group where these campaigns were coordinated. There, they discovered numerous public figures working hand in hand with healthcare workers to descend like a hive of bees on anyone “promoting misinformation.” Likewise, we learned that the most belligerent doctors we keep encountering on Twitter belonged to these groups.
  • Some of the influencers advancing PGP’s message through “Shots Heard” (and its sister United Nations initiative “Team Halo”) were hucksters who faked their own credentials. My overall impression from looking at everything was that this group operated in a very similar manner to many of the sleazy internet marketing operations I’ve seen in the past. Fortunately, the public appears to be seeing through what they did.
  • Earlier this year we exposed them. Unfortunately, their abhorrent tactics continue and recently have been aimed towards Angela Wulbrecht RN because she advocated for a patient with a widely publicized vaccine injury.  (See link for article)

——————-

Watch Dr. Aseem Malhortra’s shocking exposé on the lack of pharma accountability called, “First Do No Harm.”  https://nopharmfilm.com/

A sad example of this agency capture is the FDA just approved the ineffective but deadly FluMist vaccine and bypassed doctors altogether by ‘authorizing’ parents and any adult over 18 to give the vaccine right at home.  Go here to educate yourself about the flu vaccine, and watch this 10 minute video of Dr. Mark Geier sound the alarm on the fraud behind flu vaccines.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/agency-capture-purdue-at-scotus-george?

AGENCY CAPTURE: Purdue at SCOTUS, George Watts v. DoD

Former CDC director acknowledges “Kennedy is right;” Sackler family gets break at Supreme Court, DoD judged to have sovereign immunity.

Article Excerpts:

Today’s theme is AGENCY CAPTURE—something that RFK, Jr. has been writing about for years. A couple of days ago, former CDC director Robert Redfield paid Kennedy the following compliment in an editorial he penned for Newsweek.

Kennedy is right: All three of the principal health agencies suffer from agency capture. A large portion of the FDA’s budget is provided by pharmaceutical companies. NIH is cozy with biomedical and pharmaceutical companies and its scientists are allowed to collect royalties on drugs NIH licenses to pharma. And as the former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), I know the agency can be influenced by special interest groups.

Speaking of agency capture, fellow Substack author Sasha Latypova just reported the appalling news that George Watts v DOD case dismissed by federal court claiming “sovereign immunity”

For readers unfamiliar with this story—a perfect expression of President Eisenhower’s warning about the undue influence and power of the Military-Industrial Complex—the 24-year-old college student George Watts, Jr. died (autopsy confirmed) of vaccine-induced myocarditis. His family sued the Department of Defense for propagating the fraudulent claim that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is safe. A federal court just dismissed the lawsuit under the doctrine of sovereign immunity.

In other words, when it comes to matters of so-called “public health,” injured citizens will have one hell of a time getting justice from U.S. agencies. Uncle Sam is above the law in this domain. (See link for article)

_______________

For more:

Recently a train of articles have come out on how research and medicine have been hijacked and are completely being driven by an unholy alliance with Industrygovernment, and University research facilities Besides being unethical, which should be troublesome on its own, it causes patient suffering.  A recent example of this is a study which tested how persuasive messaging affects COVID-19 vaccine uptake intentions.  They took the best performing messages and tested them on a nationally representative sample, and then proceeded to use this crafted propaganda  and weaponized it against an unsuspecting public to guilt them into taking an experimental gene therapy injection.  This also proves that the anger towards the unvaccinated was plannedintentional psychological manipulation, all on the taxpayer’s dime.  The University study even required a ethics exemption by the University.  So if ‘the powers that be’ can conduct a study to see which pressure points work best and then carefully craft mountains of propaganda funded by the taxpayer to turn family and friends against one another, ponder what else “science” can do.

I could go onto infinity with this.

Take away: the corruption is complete.
There is no transparency or truth in mainstream media, science, medicine, public health, or scientific journals.