Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Chronic Lyme Disease Patients Want to Be Treated, Not “Managed” By Physicians

https://danielcameronmd.com/recommendations-to-clinicians-on-how-to-handle-chronic-lyme-disease-patients/

CHRONIC LYME DISEASE PATIENTS WANT TO BE TREATED, NOT ‘MANAGED’ BY PHYSICIANS

Over the past month, a series of articles, focusing on multiple aspects of Lyme disease, from pediatric Lyme to chronic Lyme to life after Lyme, have been published in the May and June issues of Infectious Disease Clinics of North America and Clinical Infectious Diseases. The articles echo messages that, for the most part, minimize a disease that impacts hundreds of thousands of people each year — many of whom are children.

By 

“Minds are like parachutes. They only function when open.” This particular quote by Thomas Dewar came to mind after reading an article, Chronic Lyme Disease (1) in the June issue of Infectious Disease Clinics of North America.

In it, the author writes, “the scientific community has largely rejected chronic, treatment-refractory Borrelia burgdorferi infection.” This is based on “the failure to detect cultivatable, clinically relevant organisms after standard treatment.”

The intention of the Chronic Lyme Disease article is evident — convince readers that chronic Lyme disease does not exist, and that antibiotics prescribed for more than 14- to 28-days are of no benefit and most patients have no lingering symptoms.

It is particularly troublesome that the author, Paul Lantos, MD, a Duke University Medical Center researcher, is co-chair on a panel responsible for updating the Infectious Disease Society of America’s (IDSA) treatment guidelines for Lyme disease. Dr. Lantos holds a position not to be taken lightly. The IDSA recommendations will determine, for the most part, the types of treatment patients diagnosed with Lyme disease will receive.

Additionally, Dr. Lantos includes a section entitled, “Clinical Approach to Patients with Chronic Lyme Disease Diagnosis,” in which he offers suggestions to physicians on how to ‘manage’ patients complaining they have chronic Lyme disease. Recommendations include listening patiently during the consultation and then explaining to the patient why their symptoms are not related to Lyme disease.

“…a certain amount of time must be spent reviewing past experiences and past laboratory tests … then explaining why Lyme disease may not account for their illnesses.”

“Even if chronic Lyme disease lacks biological legitimacy, its importance as a phenomenon can be monumental to the individual patient,” says Lantos. “Many have undergone frustrating, expensive, and ultimately fruitless medical evaluations. And many have become quite disaffected with a medical system that has failed to provide answers.”

Managing patients, who insist they have chronic Lyme disease can be challenging, he warns. This subset of patients can have “great variation in their ‘commitment’ to a chronic Lyme disease diagnosis. Some patients are entirely convinced they have chronic Lyme disease, they request specific types of therapy, and they are not interested in adjudicating the chronic Lyme disease diagnosis.”

Should a clinician have a patient who believes they have chronic Lyme disease, there are several ways to manage the evaluation, he explains. First, “the physician needs to suppress preconceptions or biases about such patients.”

Second, “the process of clinical information gathering in medicine … is no different in the context of chronic Lyme disease. Even if much discussion is centered on chronic Lyme disease.”

And, lastly, “it is of utmost importance to not seem to be impatient, dismissive, or rushed. Many patients who seek care for chronic Lyme disease already have accumulated frustration. … Each patient’s clinical story and personal history is unique and valid, even if one concludes that they do not have Lyme disease.”

For the patients who do remain chronically symptomatic, Dr. Lantos explains, there has been “little evidence of active infection, and their symptoms do not respond to antibiotics any better than to placebo.”

When dealing with complex, chronic illnesses, physicians need to develop a trusting and understanding relationship with their patients. It is impossible for a clinician to provide the highest level of care to their patients, which includes a thorough evaluation, if they enter into the doctor-patient relationship with preconceived notions, not only about an extremely complex disease but about the patient who is reporting the symptoms, which are often subjective.

Should the patient not have any of the three objective signs of Lyme disease — the bulls-eye rash, swollen knee and/or Bell’s Palsy, identifying the infection is dependent on a strong evaluation. Patients want physicians to provide effective treatments. They don’t want to be ‘managed.’

It is time for a new narrative. One that recognizes the complexity of the Lyme spirochete and acknowledges the ineffective simplicity of the ‘one-size fits all’ treatment approach.

References:

  1. Lantos PM. Chronic Lyme Disease. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 29(2), 325-340 (2015).

___________________

**Comment**

Lantos is obviously unaware of this which showed a 70% complete remission of symptoms:   https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2023/07/24/paralyzed-by-lyme-they-were-helped-with-combo-treatments/

Also, it’s imperative to point out that coinfections are rarely taken into consideration, yet chronically infected patients are notoriously coinfected with other pathogens.  The fact they don’t improve is most probably due to the fact they are not treating these coinfections which can be as bad if not worse than Lyme.  Bartonella and Babesia are two such pathogens that can knock you off your feet but require very different medications than Lyme meds.  This is simply never discussed.

My husband and I are two chronically infected patients that have improved vastly with extended antimicrobial treatment.  Without this treatment, I’m not sure either of us would be alive.  I know many others in this boat as well.  We don’t make the research papers because none of us fit the criteria to even enter a study:

These parameters that continue to be used will continue to give a preconceived outcome: no chronic/persistent infection.  It’s circular reasoning of the worst kind that hasn’t budged in over 40 years.

Compare this to Dr. Lee Merritt’s informative talk where she describes experiments done on prisoners in the 1900’s that would see them deliberately infected with the Spanish Flu.

The experiments would see some of the prisoners injected with infected lung tissue from sick or deceased patients, have infected tissue dropped in their eyes, and sprayed in the nose and mouth with infectious aerosols. Others would see mucus taken from critically ill patients and put it into the noses and throats of prisoners. In other parts of the trials, experimenters would take the blood of the sick and inject it into the healthy, to see if it was spread through infectious microorganisms in the blood.

As well as the various fluid exchanges mentioned above, a further part of the experiments saw ten healthy prisoners taken into a hospital for patients who were dying of the disease. There, they were asked to stand over the sick and dying, lean over their faces and breathe in heavily while they exhaled. Just to be sure of exposure, the flu patients would cough into the face and mouths of the prisoners.

Guess what?  Not a single patient in the experiment died of the disease – they didn’t even become ill. 
Ponder this for a moment.  
I mean, what is the likelihood?
Yet, despite this fact, we are told that the Spanish Flu is the most deadly virus on the planet.
According to many experts, this lack of proof of viral infectivity is a big deal but has resulted in a massively lucrative “vaccination” program that only worsens with time – now forcing people to concede to these injections or lose their jobs.
Meanwhile, back in Lymeland, lack of definitive proof stops the show.  Experts claim, “If we can’t see it, smell it, touch it, it doesn’t exist.” 
Anyone with half a brain would see this comparison and acknowledge that something is truly rotten in Denmark.

******

Category:

Activism, Lyme, research, Testing, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Genetics & Susceptibility to COVID

**UPDATE**

All of this was written about back in March when it was discovered that China has been purchasing the DNA of Americans. China’s BGI – a large manufacturer of one of the most popular prenatal tests in the world developed with the military, has been harvesting data from millions of women, and analyzing the data with AI.  So far 8 million women have taken BGI’s prenatal tests globally. One BGI study used a military supercomputer to re-analyze data and map the prevalence of viruses in Chinese women, look for indicators of mental illness in them, and single out Tibetan and Uyghur minorities to find links between their genes and their characteristics.

But wait, there’s more.
  • 60 Minutes learned that BGI offered to build COVID testing labs in at least six states and Chinese companies are investing in biotech companies which gives them access to health data.
  • Reuters reported that BGI, partnering with the PLA, share a dozen patents for DNA tests and one 2015 patent is for a “low-cost kit to detect respiratory pathogens, including SARS (Sever Respiratory Syndrome) and coronaviruses. 
  • BGI’s chief infectious disease expert is listed as an inventor on the patent while also being one of the 1st scientists to have sequenced COVID-19 samples from a Wuhan military hospital.
  • BGI, worth a market value of around $9 million and known for creating a cloned pig, has sold millions of their COVID-19 test kits around the world.
This should frighten everyone, but particularly immunocompromised Lyme/MSIDS patients as many of them get genetic testing done to try and help them fine-tune their treatment.

In April, 2021 this website posted an article showing that a relationship between the Gates Foundation and BGI goes back nearly a decade, with the Gates Foundation actually funding BGI projects relating to genome sequencing. The former president of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s global health program, serves as the Chairman of BGI’s Scientific Advisory Board.

One American genetic testing company widely used by Lyme/MSIDS patients called 23andme announced it would become a publicly traded company with the help of billionaire Richard Branson. A spider-web exists which includes Branson, Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Gates and the BGI Group.  Another little known web includes the CEO of 23andMe, her sister who is CEO of Youtube, and her former husband – one of the founders of Google (which owns Youtube) and president of Alphabet Inc. until 2019.

And frighteningly, work done by UW researchers here in Wisconsin could also be used for nefarious reasons.

In the video, UW researchers who in 2004 figured out how to safely and effectively get therapeutic DNA inside cells were mentioned.  But a Colonel in the People’s Liberation Army states:

“University of Wisconsin scientists have made exogenous naked DNA and injected it into the veins for easy access into muscle cells for gene therapy.  By combining this knowledge and particle-gun technology, we could create a micro bullet out of a 1 micron tungsten or gold ion, on whose surface plasmid DNA or naked DNA could be precipitated, and deliver the bullet via a gunpowder explosion, electron transmission, or a high-pressured gas to penetrate the body surface. We could then release DNA molecules to integrate with the host’s cells through blood circulation and cause disease or injury by controlling genes.

While China amasses genetic information from around the world, it has banned the collection or preservation of its citizen’s genetic information.

All of a sudden, the following article does not seem so far fetched and makes a lot of sense.

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2023/07/genetics-may-predispose-susceptibility-to-covid/

Genetics May Predispose Susceptibility to COVID

by Marco Cáceres

Published July 23, 2023

Opinion

It is generally accepted that COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is caused by an infection with the virus SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2). The virus enters human cells via a protein coding gene known as ACE2 (angiotensin converting enzyme 2). It is also largely accepted that COVID can affect different people in different ways, ranging from asymptomatic infection to severe disease, which can include respiratory failure and death. Some studies note, “risk factors for severe COVID-19 include male sex, older age, ethnicity, obesity and cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, among others.”1 2 3 4

Additionally, genetic factors have been shown to play a role in a person’s susceptibility to infection with SARS-CoV-2 and to developing severe symptoms of COVID.

Studies Suggest Genetic Factors Determine Reactions to COVID

Numerous studies have been undertaken to try and understand how host genetic factors can predispose someone to COVID. One study, for example, published in the journal Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports in December 2020 investigated how different “coding variants” of ACE2 among certain populations decreased or increased the SARS-CoV-2/ACE2 “electrostatic attention” or “binding energy.”2 5 6 

The authors stated:

Here, we combined ACE2 coding variants’ analysis in different populations and computational chemistry calculations to probe the effects on SARS-CoV-2/ACE2 interaction. ACE2-K26R; which is most frequent in Ashkenazi Jewish population decreased the SARS-CoV-2/ACE2 electrostatic attraction. On the contrary, ACE2-I468V, R219C, K341R, D206G, G211R increased the electrostatic attraction; ordered by binding strength from weakest to strongest. The aforementioned variants are most frequent in East Asian, South Asian, African and African American, European, European and South Asian populations, respectively.6

In another study published in the journal BMC Medicine in July 2020, researchers investigated genetic susceptibility to COVID by examining DNA polymorphisms (two or more variant forms) in ACE2 and the gene TMPRSS2 (transmembrane protease, serine 2). They identified 63 “potentially deleterious” variants in ACE2 and 68 “deleterious” variants in TMPRSS2, and they found that the “distribution of deleterious variants in ACE2” differs among nine populations. The researchers wrote:

Specifically, 39% (24/61) and 54% (33/61) of deleterious variants in ACE2 occur in African/African-American (AFR) and Non-Finnish European (EUR) populations, respectively Prevalence of deleterious variants among Latino/Admixed American (AMR), East Asian (EAS), Finnish (FIN), and South Asian (SAS) populations is 2–10%, while Amish (AI) and Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) populations do not appear to carry such variants in ACE2 coding regions.7

There are many other similar studies that indicate that genetic factors within different geographic and ethnic groups can play a role in the susceptibility of these populations to SARS-CoV-2 infection and the manifestation of COVID symptoms. This may explain why COVID has affected certain people disproportionately.8 9 10

Biology Can Also Determine Reactions to Other Diseases, Toxins and Vaccination

This realization, however, should come as no great surprise. After all, we are all different genetically, epigenetically. Consequently, each of us can react differently to diseases, environmental toxins and medical interventions such as vaccination.

“Each one of us is born with different genes and a unique microbiome influenced by epigenetics that affects how we respond to diseases and pharmaceutical products like vaccines,” says Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center.11

One of the best examples of how genetic variation can determine the susceptibility of a race or ethnic group to disease is sickle-cell disease, which is more common in African and Mediterranean populations than in northern European populations. The opposite is the case for the genetic disorder cystic fibrosis and the condition known as hemochromatosis (iron overload).12

According to the Susan G. Komen Foundation, the chances of a woman developing breast cancer can be determined by her ethnic background. For example, white and black women are more likely to get breast cancer than Asian/Pacific Islander or Hispanic women.13

We are biologically diverse, and that can be a strength or a weakness, depending on the threats we face. This has perhaps never been more true than with the COVID pandemic and the COVID shots.

Many people, regardless of their limited exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus or vaccination status, came down with COVID. On the other hand, there were many people who, despite heavy exposure to SARS-CoV-2, never got COVID. “There are numerous examples of couples in which one partner got seriously ill, and the spouse was taking care of them yet did not get infected,” said András Spaan, MD, PhD, a clinical microbiologist at the St. Giles Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases at New York’s Rockefeller University.14

The same can be said for the COVID shots. Approximately 81 percent of the people in the United States received at least one dose of the available COVID shots. Some 70 percent of the people in the U.S. were “fully vaccinated,” meaning at least two doses or equivalent. Many of those people experienced no noticeable short-term harm from the shots. However, many of them did and were left with Long COVID Vaccination Syndrome (LCVS) or died.15 16 17

References:

1 GeneCards. ACE2 Gene – Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2.
2 Horowitz JE. Genome-wide analysis provides genetic evidence that ACE2 influences COVID-19 risk and yields risk scores associated with severe disease. Nature Mar. 3, 2022.
3 National Library of Medicine. ACE2 angiotensin converting enzyme 2 [ Homo sapiens (human) ] July 16, 2023.
4 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID-19.
5 Rabaan AA. Genetic Variants and Protective Immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Genes (Basel) Dec. 13, 2022; 13(12): 2355.
6 Ali F et al. ACE2 coding variants in different populations and their potential impact on SARS-CoV-2 binding affinity Biochem Biophys Rep December 2020; 24: 100798.
7 Hou Y et al. New insights into genetic susceptibility of COVID-19: an ACE2 and TMPRSS2 polymorphism analysis. BMC Medicine July 15, 2020.
8 Bakhshandeh B. Variants in ACE2; potential influences on virus infection and COVID-19 severity. Infect Genet Evol June 2021; 90: 104773.
9 Beyerstedt S. COVID-19: angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) expression and tissue susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis May 2021: 40(5): 905-919.
10 Ren W. Susceptibilities of Human ACE2 Genetic Variants in Coronavirus Infection. J Virol Jan. 12, 2022; 96(1): e0149221.
11 Fisher BL. Vaccine Culture War Myths. National Vaccine Information Center.
12 Jorde LB, Wooding SP. Genetic variation, classification and ‘race’. Nature Oct. 26, 2004.
13 PIH Health. Ethnicity and Disease Risk: What’s the Connection? Apr. 21, 2021.
14 Boyle P. Are some people immune to COVID-19? AAMC News Jan. 19, 2023.
15 USAFacts.org. US Coronavirus vaccine tracker.
16 The Vaccine Reaction. Risk & Failure Reports.
17 Parpia R. “Long COVID Vaccination Syndrome” and “Long COVID” Illness Are Similar. The Vaccine Reaction July 17, 2023.

________________

**Comment**

Despite this peer-reviewed research, those of you with ears to the ground heard about the “poo storm” when Robert F. Kennedy spoke of this research and was recorded at a dinner party.  He was promptly accused of being a racist conspiracy theorist at what was described as a “booze and fart-filled dinner.”

Journalists have truly lost their way.

A reasonable sequitur would be: since the injections use the same spike protein as COVID, the injections could also be potentially racially targeting.

But there’s another reason people are having different outcomes after the COVID shots:  the entire DOD program is an ongoing clinical experiment with different arms.  This simply means some people were told they got the gene therapy injection but actually got a placebo.  Others received a lower dose and other a higher dose.  However, no matter how you cut it, the shots are bad all around with 75% of deaths causally related to the shots.

But this research has been conveniently censored by The Lancet, because it too is an inconvenient truth.

A lot can be explained due to the microclotting being seen by doctors who are using D-dimer tests of “vaccinated” patients with adverse reactions. Embalmers are also finding arteries filled with clots in the “vaccinated”.  The most implicated organ system in COVID vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53 percent), followed by the hematological (blood) system (17 percent), the respiratory system (8 percent) and multiple organ systems (7 percent). The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days, with most deaths occurring within a week from last administration of a shot.1

Research has also shown “vaccine” induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) and increased heart attacks.

This is also why aspirin and proteolytic enzymes like lumbrokinase, serrapeptase and nattokinase, (which has antiviral effects,) have been successful in helping to treat COVID as well as injuries caused by the injection.

It is high time these gene-therapy clot shots were banned. 

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

July 29: World Ivermectin Day

Join our Twitter Space event this Saturday at 4pm UTC to hear real stories from real people that have successfully utilized Ivermectin!

Featuring: 🇬🇧 Dr Tess Lawrie, 🇿🇦 Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, 🇺🇸 Dr Pierre Kory, 🇨🇦 Dr Chris Shoemaker, 🇬🇧 Edmund Fordham, PhD, 🇿🇦 Terry Herholdt, 🇬🇧 Dr Tina Peers, 🇿🇦 Dr Shankara Chetty, 🇿🇼 Dr Jackie Stone, 🇮🇳 Dr Amitav Banerjee, 🇮🇳 Dr Lenny Da Costa, and many more!

Can’t make the live meeting? Don’t worry! You can find it in the Newsroom after the meeting or in the Video Library later this week.

Mind Health Meditation with Cameron Tukapua

Join us on Telegram this Wednesday for another guided meditation led by Cameron Tukapua.
After 10 years of acupuncture practice, Cameron was invited to teach at a Wellbeing retreat centre in Hawaii. She then started an Acupuncture College in Christchurch, New Zealand and also co-leads Wellbeing, Qigong, and Yoga retreats in China. Spreading holistic worldviews is the natural extension of her practice.

BWC Workshop with Dr Marik & Dr Myhill Now Available!

In this exclusive workshop, Dr Paul Marik and Dr Sarah Myhill share their extensive knowledge of what people can do to help recover from spike-induced vaccine injury.

Watch or share this important workshop now.

General Assembly Meeting #96 Now Available

General Assembly Meeting #96

On July 17, 2023, we heard from Cambel McLaughlin, Rev Dr Wai-Ching Lee, and Shabnam Palesa Mohamed at World Council for Health General Assembly Meeting #96.

Upcoming Events

General Assembly Meeting #97

Monday 24 July

Join us in the WCH Newsroom.

Mind Health Meditation

Wednesday 26 July

Join Cameron Tukapua on Telegram.

World Ivermectin Day 2023

Saturday 29 July

Learn more at WorldIvermectinDay.org.

Join our Twitter Space here.

Emerging Post Pandemic Diseases

29-30 August

Jam For Freedom Festival

An International Celebration of Music, Art and Life

3-6 August

Harlow, Essex

Learn more here. Jam for Freedom is now SOLD OUT.

Campout 2023

An International Celebration of Music, Art and Life

10-13 August

Oxfordshire, UK

Learn more and purchase tickets here.

MAAFIM International Conference

An International Celebration of Music, Art and Life

14-17 September

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Learn more and purchase tickets here.

Click Here to Support the World Council for Health

If you found the information in this email valuable, please take a moment to forward it to a friend!

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines

Report Shows Children Have Suffered Seizures After COVID Jab

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2023/07/some-children-suffered-seizures-following-mrna-covid-shots/

Some Children Suffered Seizures Following mRNA COVID Shots

by Rishma Parpia

Published July 4, 2023

Risk & Failure Reports

child suffering a seizure

A 2023 analysis published by researchers from Kaiser Permanente and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the journal Pediatrics compared vaccine adverse outcomes following administration of Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 shot and Moderna/NIAID’s Spikevax mRNA COVID-19 shot among recipients under five years old for a period of 1-21 days post-vaccination, compared to outcomes among those vaccinated 22-42 days post-vaccination. The authors reported that 104 children under the age of five suffered seizures after receiving an mRNA COVID shot.1

Although the study authors said that safety surveillance of more than 245,000 mRNA COVID shot doses over a period of nine months did not detect a safety signal for any outcome during the 21 days after vaccination, the data did show many adverse outcomes in absolute terms.2 3

Researchers leading the study used a process known as Rapid Cycle Analysis (RCA) to examine adverse vaccine outcomes of mRNA COVID shots on children under the age of five.4 RCA methods used in the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) were developed to conduct population-based monitoring of potential outcomes associated with a vaccine in near real-time by examining outcome rates in recent vaccine recipients during risk intervals in relation to rates during comparison intervals. Any associations between a vaccine and adverse outcomes produced by this approach are considered statistical signals that indicate the need for further investigation into the safety of a vaccine.5

The first period of 1-21 days, known as the “primary risk interval,” is believed to be the time-period that vaccinated people are more likely to experience adverse events. The period from 22-42 days is known as a comparison interval.6 Even though it is an assumption that adverse events that occur more than 21 days after vaccination are not associated with the vaccine received, according to William Schaffner, MD, a professor of preventative medicine at Vanderbilt University, said:

The idea for the events that occur in the latter period is that ‘it’s too late for them to be associated with a vaccine.’7

The analysis examined specific events that fit one or more of 23 specified outcomes, including seizures, myocarditis, appendicitis, Bell’s palsy, encephalitis, etc. following mRNA COVID shots.8

The analysis examined data available from June 18, 2022 to Mar. 18, 2023. 135,005 doses of Comirnaty were given to children six months to four years of age and 112,006 doses of Spikevax were given to children six months to five years of age in the VSD population.9

Study Finds Severe Adverse Outcomes in Children Following COVID Vaccination

One hundred and four children under six years of age suffered a seizure within 42 days of an mRNA COVID shot. In the first 21 days, 38 recipients of Comirnaty shots suffered seizures and 23 recipients of Spikevax shots experienced seizures. In the second period of 22-42 days following vaccination, 24 Comirnaty shot recipients suffered seizures and 19 Spikevax shot recipients experienced seizures.10

Appendicitis, Bell’s palsy, encephalitis, myelitis, or encephalomyelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), immune thrombocytopenia, Kawasaki disease, pulmonary embolism, hemorrhagic stroke, transverse myelitis and venous thromboembolism were detected in at least one child 1-42 days following mRNA COVID vaccination.11

Downplaying the significance of the serious immune and neurological disorders reported in children after mRNA COVID shots, Dr. Schaffner said:

We know that if you follow a half million children over the period of the year, some bad stuff is going to happen to some of those children.12

NVIC Calls For Vaccine Safety Studies by Independent Researchers

Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), said that independent researchers should be conducting safety studies to compare outcomes from vaccinated and unvaccinated people. She stated:

The VSD is a government-maintained database that cannot be viewed by the public and is not easily accessible to independent researchers for oversight on or replication of study findings.13

Fisher added:

Where are the independent, methodologically sound COVID vaccine studies conducted by researchers who are not paid by government or industry that evaluate all morbidity and mortality outcomes in young children who do and do not receive mRNA COVID vaccines? That’s the study parents want to see done.

__________________

**Comment**

If you need an example of why studies can not be trusted at face-value, look no further.  To assume that a side effect that shows up on day 22 is somehow magically NOT caused by a vaccine demonstrates perfectly the insanity being touted as “science.”

Arbitrary cut-offs have been occurring in Lymeland for over 40 years and make no logical sense whatsoever, yet are accepted as science.

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Yet Another Magazine Uses Name Calling To Belittle Lyme Patients

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/31708332

Insider article: A woman is trying out a 4-dose Lyme disease vaccine

Carl Tuttle

Hudson, NH, United States

JUN 28, 2023 — 

Please read the following complaint letter sent to the Insider regarding inaccurate information relating to Lyme vaccines.

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “corrections@insider.com” <corrections@insider.com>
Cc: “hbrueck@businessinsider.com” <hbrueck@businessinsider.com>, “jhood@insider.com” <jhood@insider.com>, “hbeckler@insider.com” <hbeckler@insider.com>, “rzisser@insider.com” <rzisser@insider.com>, “cpreti@insider.com” <cpreti@insider.com>, “pdifiore@insider.com” <pdifiore@insider.com>, “information@axelspringer.de” <information@axelspringer.de>
Date: 06/28/2023 11:53 AM EDT
Subject: A woman is trying out a 4-dose Lyme disease vaccine as we approach the worst summer for ticks yet

Insider

A woman is trying out a 4-dose Lyme disease vaccine as we approach the worst summer for ticks yet
https://www.insider.com/lyme-vaccine-for-people-being-tested-across-us-europe-pfizer-2023-6

By Hilary Brueck  Jun 27, 2023

“Although studies showed it [LYMErix] was about 75% effective at stopping Lyme disease, it received a lukewarm public reception and was the subject of conspiracy-theory lawsuits, driving down sales and leading it to be quickly taken off the market.”

Insider
1 Liberty Plz Fl 8,
New York, New York, 10006

To: the management team at Insider,

I would like to register a complaint regarding the statement highlighted above. The following link will take you to the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee’s January 31, 2001 meeting:
Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting
Excerpt:

“The people who have contacted us were, prior to vaccination with LYMErix, healthy, active and energetic. Indeed, the very reason they sought the LYMErix vaccine was their desire to preserve their healthy, active lifestyle. However, what they experienced was a dramatic degradation of their health and quality of life. As will be described below, these previously healthy individuals are now afflicted with painful, at times debilitating arthritic symptoms, including joint pain and swelling, as well as extremely severe Lyme-disease-like symptoms which have persisted to this day.” 

Question: Does that sound like a conspiracy-theory?

Additional concerns:

There were neurological complications with the previous “OspA-Based” Lyme vaccine (LYMErix) as published in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine. Reports of cerebral ischemia, transient Ischemic attacks, demyelinating events, optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, and non-specific demyelinating conditions are evaluated in this paper. To my knowledge, there were no studies to determine why LYMErix caused these serious complications.

Neurological complications of vaccination with outer surface protein A (OspA)
https://content.iospress.com/articles/international-journal-of-risk-and-safety-in-medicine/jrs527

And we are to believe Pfizer will bring a “safe and effective” product to market? A company that paid the highest fine for health care fraud:

Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History
 
Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing (Wednesday, September 2, 2009)
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history

A chronic relapsing seronegative disease does not fit the vaccine model so deny the chronically infected and your patents for vaccines and diagnostic technology continue to reap patent royalties as evidence of persistent infection (following the one-size-fits-all IDSA mandated treatment protocol) must be concealed/ignored at all costs.

In the interest of time I have shortened the evidence to five points below with most reference links taken from the NH COMMISSION TO STUDY TESTING FOR LYME AND OTHER TICK-BORNE DISEASES of which I was a member appointed by Governor Chris Sununu:

Barbara Johnson of the CDC put Advanced Laboratory Services out of business after the lab was reporting 80% positive culture results. If contamination was an issue as Johnson claimed,[i] why didn’t the CDC work with Advanced Laboratory Services to correct the problem? Culture is the gold standard for definitive diagnosis of bacterial and fungal infections worldwide but when it threatens the existing paradigm suddenly it becomes “not particularly useful.” Johnson by the way filed her own patent  [ii] a year earlier for the detection, diagnosis and/or treatment of Lyme disease.

Dr. Sin Lee had been working with the CDC on a project to develop proficiency testing for his DNA sequencing-based tests for Lyme Borreliosis (Approved by the New York Dept. of Health) When Dr. Lee reported a case of chronic [iii] Lyme through Sanger sequencing suddenly all communication stopped. A positive DNA test is irrefutable evidence of active infection.

The CDC refuses to recognize the mountain of publications identifying persistent infection after extensive antibiotic treatment. A chronic relapsing seronegative disease should have set off a red flag but its misclassification as a simple “nuisance disease” has left hundreds of thousands if not millions worldwide in a debilitated state.

The CDC refuses to recognize the disabling stage of Lyme disease as reported by the Lyme patient population worldwide because it contradicts the CDC 30yr Official Narrative; “Lyme is hard to catch and easily treated with 2-4wks of antibiotics” Social Security disability compensation is denied leaving patients to fend for themselves.

Serology (Western blot) was manipulated to facilitate vaccine development. The two most significant bands, 31 (Outer surface protein A) and band 34 (Outer surface protein B) of the spirochete were removed as those who were vaccinated would test positive. Humans do not produce antibodies to Lyme disease for 4-6 weeks after a tick bite so serology has always been the wrong diagnostic tool but absolutely essential to deceptively prove vaccine efficacy.

Patent royalties and pharmaceutical profits [iv] over lifesaving care.

Unimaginable pain and suffering for the sake of a vaccine while our public health officials ignore the evidence that we are dealing with an antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug.

Questions: Where is the outrage? Will any of these facts find their way into a revised article at the Insider or is the conspiracy-theory statement final? Who coached Hilary Brueck in the writing of her article?

A response to this complaint is requested.

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH

To TBDWG: “The CDC has propagated a false Lyme disease narrative”
https://www.lymedisease.org/tuttle-tbdwg-false-narrative/

Re: Lyme borreliosis: diagnosis and management (Published letter to the editor of the BMJ)
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1041/rr-1

Additional References

[i] Assessment of New Culture Method for Detection of Borrelia Species from Serum of Lyme Disease Patients

Barbara J. B. Johnson, Mark A. Pilgard, and Theresa M. Russell
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3957795/

[ii] COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS RELATING TO LYME DISEASE
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2013110026A1/en?oq=ininventor:%22Barbara+J.B.+JOHNSON%22

[iii] Lyme disease caused by Borrelia burgdorferi with two homeologous 16S rRNA genes: a case report

Johnson Patent
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27186082/

[iv] Valneva Receives FDA Fast Track Designation for its Lyme Disease Vaccine Candidate VLA15
https://valneva.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2017_07_24_VLA_Lyme_FDA_Fast_track_PR_EN.pdf

____________________

**Comment**

It is clear Brueck was coached from one of many in the Lyme Cabal.  Proof the Lyme narrative is being controlled:

  • Cabalist Gary Wormser has developed diagnostics for Pfizer’s Lyme “vaccine” trial.  The man continues to use taxpayer money to propagate the ongoing Lyme narrative.
  • Cabalist Dr. Mark Klempner calls LYMErix’s removal a “tragedy.” Please know the backstory on Klempner, which includes a history with biological weapons as both director and investigator of a bioweapons lab, accusations of research fraud, and his single-handedly convincing mainstream medicine that extended treatment won’t help Lyme/MSIDS patients. The infamous “Klempner” trial has ruled Lyme-land for over 20 years.  Klempner was also the trial administrator of the Connaught OspA Lyme vaccine in the 1990s, and is quite aware of the adverse effects of injecting OspA into people, yet despite all of this, he  was an author of the 2006 IDSA Lyme Treatment “Guidelines” that were the subject of an investigation by Senator Richard Blumenthal which exposed undisclosed financial conflicts in many of the panelists as well as the fact they simply ignored alternative medical opinion (which is happening again with COVID). Those guidelines relied heavily on his 2001 “retreatment” study in which most of the participants had not been treated in the first place.  He claims his new shot isn’t a “vaccine;” however, according to this,  OspA is still in it. Here’s what Dr. Stricker has to say about OspA: 

Another Lyme OspA Vaccine Whitewash

The meta-analysis by Zhao and colleagues comes to the conclusion that “the OspA vaccine against Lyme disease is safe and its immunogenicity and efficacy have been verified.” The authors arrive at this sunny conclusion by excluding 99.6% of published articles that demonstrate potential problems with the OspA vaccine. Furthermore, the authors ignore peer-reviewed studies, FDA regulatory meetings and legal proceedings that point to major problems with OspA vaccine safety (1-3). This whitewash bodes ill for future Lyme vaccine candidates because it fosters disregard for vaccine safety among Lyme vaccine manufacturers and mistrust among potential Lyme vaccinees.

  • Cabalist Sam Telford teaches biosecurity, specializes in the bioweapon Tularemia, and was the director of a bio-level 3 lab in Groton, Massachusetts that works on dangerous, tickborne diseases on the government’s select agent list.  He’s funded by the NIH and the military-industrial complex but dismisses all concerns of biowarfare research and spends his time bad-mouthing doctors who dare to defy the narrative. He laments and blames a rotavirus vaccine for children that was demonstrated to actually do harm added to the growing anti-vaccine sentiment around the same time of Lymerix, making us question if the man has a heart in his body at all or is merely stuffed with straw.
  • Cabalist Linden Hu, recruited by Klempner, is a professor of Microbiology and Basic Science at Tufts Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and is fixated on the ever lucrative vaccine-infused mouse food which contains a virus what he insists is safe.  Thankfully the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture is leery.  He has also proposed putting an antibiotic into mouse food at bait stations. The science it’s all based on was done more than a decade ago. This project was also stalled due to fears of antibiotic resistance.  Given the appropriate title of the “crazy man” of Lyme disease, he is leading NIH funded studies to investigate feeding live ticks on people as a diagnostic test and releasing genetically altered viruses to prevent disease in the animals in the wild.  His laboratory works with leading pharmaceutical companies in the development of vaccines and other approaches to prevent human Lyme disease.  Hu and Telford just received nearly 4 MILLION from the NIH to study a more narrow-spectrum antibiotic.
I’m having flash-backs of childhood cartoons of mad scientists that want to rule the world.

Category:

Activism, Lyme, vaccines